RSZWOBJ table growing too large

Hello Experts:
RSZWOBJ is the largest table at my client. Does anyone have experience with archiving the RSZWOBJ table or handling its data growth?
Thanks,
Jane

Hi,
can you carry out say bookmark purge for the content which are older than 6 months or so?
can u check that whether we can delete those history from the system and appraently from table?
How to delete user defined Bookmarks ?
How to find the Infoprovider and Query name with help of WAD tech name:
Thanks and regards
Kiran

Similar Messages

TIme Machine backup grows too large during backup process

I have been using Time Machine without a problem for several months, backing up my imac - 500GB drive with 350g used. Recently TM failed because the backups had finally filled the external drive - 500GB USB. Since I did not need the older backups, I reformatted the external drive to start from scratch. Now TM tries to do an initial full backup but the size keeps growing as it is backing up, eventually becoming too large for the external drive and TM fails. It will report, say, 200G to back up, then it reaches that point and the "Backing up XXXGB of XXXGB" just keeps getting larger. I have tried excluding more than 100GB of files to get the backup set very small, but it still grows during the backup process. I have deleted plist and cache files as some discussions have suggested, but the same issue occurs each time. What is going on???

Michael Birtel wrote:
Here is the log for the last failure. As you see it indicates there is enough room 345g needed, 464G available, but then it fails. I can watch the backup progress, it reaches 345G and then keeps growing till it give out of disk space error. I don't know what "Event store UUIDs don't match for volume: Macintosh HD" implies, maybe this is a clue?
No. It's sort of a warning, indicating that TM isn't sure what's changed on your internal HD since the previous backup, usually as a result of an abnormal shutdown. But since you just erased your TM disk, it's perfectly normal.
Starting standard backup
Backing up to: /Volumes/Time Machine Backups/Backups.backupdb
Ownership is disabled on the backup destination volume. Enabling.
2009-07-08 19:37:53.659 FindSystemFiles[254:713] Querying receipt database for system packages
2009-07-08 19:37:55.582 FindSystemFiles[254:713] Using system path cache.
Event store UUIDs don't match for volume: Macintosh HD
Backup content size: 309.5 GB excluded items size: 22.3 GB for volume Macintosh HD
No pre-backup thinning needed: 345.01 GB requested (including padding), 464.53 GB available
This is a completely normal start to a backup. Just after that last message is when the actual copying begins. Apparently whatever's happening, no messages are being sent to the log, so this may not be an easy one to figure out.
First, let's use Disk Utility to confirm that the disk really is set up properly.
First, select the second line for your internal HD (usually named "Macintosh HD"). Towards the bottom, the Format should be +Mac OS Extended (Journaled),+ although it might be +Mac OS Extended (Case-sensitive, Journaled).+
Next, select the line for your TM partition (indented, with the name). Towards the bottom, the Format must be the same as your internal HD (above). If it isn't, you must erase the partition (not necessarily the whole drive) and reformat it with Disk Utility.
Sometimes when TM formats a drive for you automatically, it sets it to +Mac OS Extended (Case-sensitive, Journaled).+ Do not use this unless your internal HD is also case-sensitive. All drives being backed-up, and your TM volume, should be the same. TM may do backups this way, but you could be in for major problems trying to restore to a mis-matched drive.
Last, select the top line of the TM drive (with the make and size). Towards the bottom, the *Partition Map Scheme* should be GUID (preferred) or +Apple Partition Map+ for an Intel Mac. It must be +Apple Partition Map+ for a PPC Mac.
If any of this is incorrect, that's likely the source of the problem. See item #5 of the Frequently Asked Questions post at the top of this forum for instructions, then try again.
If it's all correct, perhaps there's something else in your logs.
Use the Console app (in your Applications/Utilities folder).
When it starts, click +Show Log List+ in the toolbar, then navigate in the sidebar that opens up to your system.log and select it. Navigate to the +Starting standard backup+ message that you noted above, then see what follows that might indicate some sort of error, failure, termination, exit, etc. (many of the messages there are info for developers, etc.). If in doubt post (a reasonable amount of) the log here.

SharePoint TempDB.mdf growing too large? I have to restart SQL Server all the time. Please help

Hi there,
On our DEV SharePoint farm > SQL server
The tempdb.mdf size grows too quickly and too much. I am tired of increasing the space and cannot do that anymore.
All the time I have to reboot the SQL server to get tempdb to normal size.
The Live farm is okay (with similar data) so it must be something wrong with our
DEV environment.
Any idea how to fix this please?
Thanks so much.

How do you get the tempdb to 'normal size'? How large is large and how small is normal.
Have you put the databases in simple recovery mode? It's normal for dev environments to not have the required transaction log backups to keep the ldf files in check. That won't affect the tempdb but if you've got bigger issues then that might be a symptom.
Have you turned off autogrowth for the temp DB?

EM Application Log and Web Access Log growing too large on Redwood Server

Hi,
We have a storage space issue on our Redwood SAP CPS Orcale servers and have found that the two log files above are the main culprits for this. These files are continually updated and I need to know what these are and if they can be purged or reduced down in size.
They have been in existence since the system has been installed and I have tried to access them but they are too large. I have also tried taking the cluster group offline to see if the file stops being updated but the file continues to be updated.
Please could anyone shed any light on this and what can be done to resolve it?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Jason

Hi David,
The file names are:
em-application.log and web access.log
The File path is:
D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\oc4j\j2ee\OC4J_DBConsole_brsapprdbmp01.britvic.BSDDRINKS.NET_SAPCPSPR\log
Redwood/CPS version is 6.0.2.7
Thanks for your help.
Kind Regards,
Jason

Tablespace growing too large

Good morning gurus,
Sorry if I sound novice at some point .
I have this table space vending of size 188,598.6MB.It keeps on growing.I have to give it extra space every week and all is consumed.It is a permanent table space with extent management local and segment space management auto.This table space is the backbone of the database which is 250G.We are currently running oracle 10.2.0.4 on windows.
Please help
Regards
Deepika

Hi..
Please do mention the database version and the OS.
You need to know what are the objects, object_types on such a big tablespace.Which schemas use it waht do they do.Do they do any kind of DIRECT Loading in the database.Are all the tables and the indexes on the same tablespace.What i feel is, you are having all the tables and the indexes on the same tablespace.I would recommend 2 things:--
1. Do the data purging.Talk to the considered applications team,or who so ever is the concerned person, and the decide data retention period in the database and move the rest of the data to some other database as history.
2. Keep different tablespaces for the tables and indexes.
HTH
Anand

Music library growing too large...

I've been using Quod Libet as my music player for a while now, and it is pretty much exactly what I want in a music player. However, as my music collection grows, it has been slowing down lately. I have over 8000 songs now, around 40 gigs, and Quod Libet will slow down, peg cpu usage, and crash quite often now. What other options do I have? I know Amarok can use a real database backend that should scale way beyond what I currently have, but prefer GTK apps and the Quod Libet interface. Can MPD handle a library this large? Any MPD clients that are Quod Libet like? Anyway to make Quod Libet scale better?
Thanks

luciferin wrote:
dmz wrote:http://www.last.fm/user/betbot
It takes a true audiophile to require The Spice Girls in lossless quality
Here's me: http://www.last.fm/user/Arch
That's right, I nabbed the nick Arch way back in 2004 on Audioscrobbler and Neowin.net Arch Linux and I were meant to be together.
And to derail this thread a little bit: does anybody know of a linux music player that doesn't use a database? Just adds files from your directories ala Foobar?
The Spice Girls is very underestimated. And Mel C is a hell of a girl. So beautiful.. I wish.. oh well. Maybe you want to take a look at mocp or cmus, if you dont want to use mpd.

Automatic Deployment Rule for SCEP Definitions growing too large.

See the deployment package for SCEP definition is now 256MB and growing. How can we make sure it stays small? The ADR creating the package is leaving 26 Definition in there right now.

The method that Kevin suggests above is what is implemented as part of a default deployment template included with SP1. This limits the number of definitions in the update group to the latest eight (I think).
As a supplemental note here, whenever an ADR runs and is configured to use an existing update group, it first wipes that update group.
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

RTP jitter buffer growing too large?

Hi all I am experiencing a rather annoying problem when receiving RTP audio data and rendering it: It takes some time for the player to get created and realized, in the mean time RTP packets continued to arrive, causing them to be buffered. It appeared that the buffer grew until data is drained from it (by the player), so the longer it took the player to get created and realized the larger the buffer became, causing a massive delay which is annoying when a conversation is being carried out. I did set the buffer length (via the RTPManager's BufferControl) to 200ms but this does not seem to make any difference. I don't have direct proof that this is what actually happened under the hood but all evidence seemed to point to this unchecked growth of the jitter buffer. The faster the computer, the faster the player get realized and the smaller the delay.
Does anyone else experience this phenomenon? Is there a fix?

I don't know if your diagnosis is correct, for shure I have a lot of jitter between two PC using the same java app and playing a RTP broadcast audio.
But I could not relate it with the speed of the computer, sometimes A plays before B, sometimes after. Problably it is the time to create objects that varies.
Still looking for a solution....

Content Database Growing too large

We seem to be experiencing some slowness on our SharePoint farm and noticed that one of our databases (we have two) is now at 170 Gb. Best practice seems to be to keep the database from going over 100Gb.
We have hundreds of Sites within one Database and need to spit these up to save space on our databases.
So I would like to create some new databases and move some of the sites from the old database over to the new databases.
Can anyone tell me if I am on the right track here and if so how to safely move these sites to another Content Database?
dfrancis

I would not recommend using RBS. Microsoft's RBS is really just meant to be able to exceed the 4GB/10GB MDF file size limit in SQL Express. RBS space /counts against/ database size, and backup/restore becomes a more complex task.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

CSCtz15346 - /mnt/pss directory growing too large and having no free space

      hello,
Nexus 3K switch is not allowing me to save the configuration, showing the below message.
          switch %$ VDC-1 %$ %SYSMGR-2-NON_VOLATILE_DB_FULL: System non-volatile storage usage is unexpectedly high at 99%
switch# switch# copy r s
[########################################] 100%
Configuration update aborted: request was aborted
switch#
how to clean up /mnt/pss ?
Thanks

Hi Naga,
From the CLI, issue "show system internal flash" to see what directory is taking up the space.   Unfortunately, if it is /mnt/pss, then you really need to engage TAC to get on the switch and enable the internal access to the file system so it can be cleared up.
Sincerely,
David.

Dynamic table grows to 3 pages, preceding section of document moves, appears in middle of table!

I have a form with several sections, say (a) 'header', (b) 'instructions', (c) dynamic table.    This works very well in general - as long as the total form fits on 2 pages.
However, if the number of rows in the dynamic table gets too large, and flows to page 3 (or more), then the 'instructions' section moves from being in it's normal order - and shows up inside the table at the top of page 3 (last page)!     i.e., this section shows breaks the flow of the table, inserts a complete section, and then continues with the table!
Any ideas?    I've tried manually hiding/showing things and other tricks to try to get it to work as it does with a smaller table.

After mucho effort to reduce the problem, it turned out that I had the misbehaving section "Keep with -previous-" checked.    Not sure what this does really, and it certainly wasn't working correctly - but heck, removing it solved my problem.
I did reproduce the problem to this:
subform - marked 'Keep with previous"
repeating table
That's it.    Once the size of the repeating table goes to page 3, the previous subform jumps to the top of page 3.    Go figure.
(Somewhat humorously, in the linked to file - even the preceding element to the offending subform is also dragged to the top of page 3.)
Clearly shows bug in a minimal form - http://www.radioshowlinks.com/f/cwb/TooSimple-v13.pdf
Thanks again for all your help!!!
p

Var/adm/utmpx: value too large for defined datatype

Hi,
On a Solaris 10 machine I cannot use last command to view login history etc. It tells something like "/var/adm/utmpx: value too large for defined datatype".
The size of /var/adm/utmpx is about 2GB.
I tried renaming the file to utmpx.0 and create a new file using head utmpx.0 > utmpx but after that the last command does not show any output. The new utmpx file seems to be updating with new info though... as seen from file last modified time.
Is there a standard procedure to recreate a new utmpx file once it grows too largs?? I couldnt find much in man pages
Thanks in advance for any help

The easiest way is to cat /dev/null to utmpx - this will clear out the file to 0 bytes but leave it intact.
from the /var/adm/ directory:
cat /dev/null > /var/adm/utmpx
Some docs suggest going to single user mode to do this, or stopping the utmp service daemon first, but I'm not positive this is necessary. Perhaps someone has input on that aspect. I've always just sent /dev/null to utmpx and wtmpx without a problem.
BTW - I believe "last" works with wtmpx, and "who" works with utmpx.

Error on activating the table "DB length of the key of table too large"

Hi Experts,
I am getting the error while activating my table PSM_REQ_BO_ELM_NAME. Activation error log is as follows
"DB length of the key of table PSM_REQ_BO_ELM_NAME is too large (>900)"..
I have a table which has 4 filed as key one with char 6 and rest 3 with char 120 each.
Could you please help me to get rid of this error.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Pradeep

When ever we create a table in Data dictionary, a corresponding database table will be created in Data base server. For the primary key we maintained in Data Dictionary, another data base table will be created seperately where as the table length should not exceed some limit set by the Administrator.
So, Reduce the length of the primary key in the table by deleting the field as key field/ reducing the size of the field.
In your case, maintain the primary key field length not more than 400.
***Length if the Primary key should not exceed 120. other wise performance will be low while fetching the data.

My audit database getting too large

Post Author: amr_foci
CA Forum: Administration
my audit database getting too large, how i reset it?

Post Author: jsanzone
CA Forum: Administration
Amr,
The best that I can determine, there is no official documentation from BusinessObjects regarding a method to "trim" the Auditor database. Based on previous disucssions, I seem to remember that you are on XI R2, but if I'm wrong, then these notes will not apply to you. Here is the scoop:
There are six tables used by Auditor: 1) APPLICATION_TYPE (initialized w/ 13 rows, does not "grow") 2) AUDIT_DETAIL (tracks activity at a granular level, grows) 3) AUDIT_EVENT (tracks activity at a granular level, grows) 4) DETAIL_TYPE (initialized w/ 28 rows, does not "grow") 5) EVENT_TYPE (initialized w/ 41 rows, does not "grow") 6) SERVER_PROCESS ( (initialized w/ 11 rows, does not "grow")
If you simply want to remove all audit data and start over, then truncate AUDIT_EVENT and AUDIT_DETAIL.
If you want to only remove rows based on a period, then consider that the two tables, AUDIT_DETAIL and AUDIT_EVENT, are transactional in nature, however, AUDIT_DETAIL is a child to the parent table AUDIT_EVENT, thus you will want to remove rows from AUDIT_DETAIL based on its link to AUDIT_EVENT before removing rows from AUDIT_EVENT first. Otherwise, rows in AUDIT_DETAIL will get "orphaned" and never be of any use to you, and worse, you will not readily know how to ever delete these rows again.
Here is the SQL statements:delete from AUDIT_DETAILwhere event_id =(select Event_ID from AUDIT_EVENT where Start_Timestamp between '1/1/2006' and '12/31/2006')godelete from AUDIT_EVENT where Start_Timestamp between '1/1/2006' and '12/31/2006'go
One word of caution is to down you BOE application before doing this maintenance work, otherwise there is a possibility that Auditor will be busy trying to bring new rows to your database while you're busy delete rows and you might encounter an unwanted table lock, either on the work you're doing or the work that BOE is trying to perform.
Good luck!

BW Web Report Issue - Result set too large

Hi,
When I execute a BEx Query on Web I am getting “Result set too large ; data retrieval restricted by configuration (maximum = 500000 cells)”.
Following to my search in SDN I understood we can remove this restriction either across the BW system globally or for a specific query at WAD template.
In my 7x Web template I am trying to increase default max no of rows parameters, As per the below inputs from SAP Note: 1127156.
But I can’t find parameter “Size Restriction for Result Sets” for any of the web items (Analysis/Web Template properties/Data Provider properties)….in the WAD Web template
Please advise where/how can I locate the properites
Instructions provided in SAP Note…
The following steps describe how to change the "safety belt" for Query Views:
1. Use the context menu Properties / Data Provider in a BEx Web Application to maintain the "safety belt" for a Query View.
2. Choose the register "Size Restriction for Result Sets".
3. Choose an entry from the dropdown box to specify the maximum number of cells for the result set.
The following values are available:
o Maximum Number
o Default Number
o Custom-Defined Number
Behind "Maximum Number" and "Default Number" you can find the current numbers defined in the customizing table RSADMIN (see below).
4. Save the Query View and use it in another Web Template.
Thanks in advance

Hi Yasemin,
Thanks for all help...i was off couple of days.
To activate it I can suggest to create a dummy template, add your query in it, add a menu bar component add an action to save the query view. Then you run the template and change the size restriction for result set then you can save it by the menu.
Can you please elaborate on the solution provided,I created dummy template with analysis and Menu bar item...i couldn't able to configure menu bar item...
Thanks in advance

RSZWOBJ table growing too large

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for