RTV-20003: Warning: Cannot perform Partition Exchange Loading

Hi,
We have a unique situation in which the data has to be loaded 4 times each month to the fact table. The fact table is partitioned by month. We have configured the mappings so that DIRECT is false and REPLACE DATA option is also false (so that we don't loose exisiting data, if any). When the data is loaded to the fact for the first time then PEL is performed but when data is loaded for 2nd, 3rd and 4th time in the current partition OWB issues a warning (RTV-20003). We understand that in these cases data is still loaded but without using PEL. Is there any way to force OWB to perform PEL all 4 times without lossing the exisiting data in the current partition?
Thanks, Yashu

Hi, you can't use PEL to add data to an existing partition: by definition PEL swaps the rows in a regular, non-partitioned table with the rows in 1 partition of a partitioned table. Or better said, it swaps the table data segment with the partition data segment, and possibly the corresponding index segments if the indexes match and the part.table indexes are local. This means you are not really moving any rows so you can't add any to the partition using PEL.
As a safety net, OWB provides "replace data = false" by default so you don't trash your data.
If the 4 loads/month are 1 per week, you can consider creating e.g. 4 week partitions instead of month partitions. OWB PEL can't handle weeks: if you follow this route you should disable OWB PEL and exchange partitions 'by hand' inside a stored procedure called in the postmapping. This can be worth if you have really big volumes or if you want to feed your fact table very fast, staging new rows and then swapping them in almost instantaneously. You should evaluate your index rebuild speed requirements too.
Hope this helps, Antonio

Similar Messages

  • Problem in Direct Partition Exchange Loading(PEL)

    Hi all,
    I am facing a problem during execution of a OWB mapping. The map is using direct partition exchange loading. There are one source and one target table in the map. it is very simple.
    While the source and target are in the same schema there is no problem. But when they are in different schemas during execution a warning is given. That is:
    ResolveTableNameErrorRTV20006;BIA_RTL_INTERFACE"."SALE_SRC
    Here BIA_RTL_INTERFACE is source schema and SALE_SRC is source table.
    However the source record is going to the target table as required but the same record also exists in the same table after execution which is not desirable for direct PEL. So i think though the loading is done in target but it is not using the direct Partition Exchange Technique.
    Is there some kind of special privileage for Partition Exchange Loading when the source and target are in different schemas in the same database? Plase clarify this. Hope i can explain the problem. Waiting for reply.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sumanta Das
    Kolkata

    The error means you are trying to swap a partition that still contains data in a configuration where OWB expects an empty partition. How did you set the "Replace existing data in Target Partition" configuration parameter?
    Also, for more details on PEL, review the 10.19 to 10.27 pages of the user manual.
    Regards:
    Igor

  • Partition Exchange Loading (PEL)

    Hi everyone,
    I'm trying to set up a mapping in Oracle Warehouse Builder 9.0.4 to use Partition Exchange Loading.
    When running, I get the warning: PELWarningRTV1003
    Does anyone know what this message means, and where I can find information about such error messages?
    Thanks for your help!
    Best regards,
    Ronald Ommundsen

    The error means you are trying to swap a partition that still contains data in a configuration where OWB expects an empty partition. How did you set the "Replace existing data in Target Partition" configuration parameter?
    Also, for more details on PEL, review the 10.19 to 10.27 pages of the user manual.
    Regards:
    Igor

  • Virtual column and partition exchange load

    Hi All,
    Can someone tell me that if i have a virtual column on a table in 11g then can we load the data as partition exchange loading into the table.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ankit Rana

    Hemant K Chitale wrote:
    Why not run a simple test with a dummy table, a few columns (plus a virtual column) and a few partitions ?
    Excellent suggestion.
    Shouldn't take more than about 30 minutes to create a test case - and if it takes more than 30 minutes the OP needs the practice anyway to get a better feel for the technology.
    Hint to OP: make sure you put some data in the "incoming" table, make sure you put some data in the "non-exchanged" partitions, remember to include a unique/pk constraint if you're expecting one on production, and run with sql_trace enabled to see what's happening in the background.
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis

  • Partition Exchange Load in same schema

    Hi all,
    If my source and target tables are in different schema but table's structures are same. Can I apply Direct partition exchange load (PEL) in my mapping using OWB. Plz help me......
    Thank & Regards
    Soumen

    Hemant K Chitale wrote:
    Why not run a simple test with a dummy table, a few columns (plus a virtual column) and a few partitions ?
    Excellent suggestion.
    Shouldn't take more than about 30 minutes to create a test case - and if it takes more than 30 minutes the OP needs the practice anyway to get a better feel for the technology.
    Hint to OP: make sure you put some data in the "incoming" table, make sure you put some data in the "non-exchanged" partitions, remember to include a unique/pk constraint if you're expecting one on production, and run with sql_trace enabled to see what's happening in the background.
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis

  • Partition Exchange Loading

    Have anyone had success with this feature in OWB? I've just attempted it but got an "ORA-12841: Cannot alter the session parallel DML state within a transaction". Is there a property somewhere to stop it from generating these alter sessions stmt?
    TIA
    Hong
    Environment:
    OWB version 9.0.2.62.3
    Oracle9i EE 9.0.1.3.0
    Solaris 2.7

    There is a number of restrictions when using Partition Exchange, please check these conditions are true:
    - The partition you are loading into is empty,
    - The index is local (i.e. every partition has it's own index),
    - All the data you are loading fits into the partition (this is a primary suspect in your case),
    - Loading tipe is INSERT (DELETE/INSERT, TRUNCATE/INSERT, CHECK/INSERT should work bu you can get warnings during generation),
    Regards:
    Igor

  • Partition exchange loading for specific subpartitions

    Hi All,
    Looking at an archive strategy - where we have to archive a specific dataset.
    Rather than a insert/delete routine - I was thinking of using partition exchange.
    The to-be archived table is interval range partitioned on date, with a list subpartition on country.
    It is for specific countries that I want to partition exchange.
        create table
        test_table
        (tbl_id number,
        country varchar2(2),
        sales_dt date,
        volume number)
        partition by range (sales_dt) interval (NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1,'Month'))
        subpartition by list (country)
        Subpartition template
        (subpartition p_ireland values ('IR'),
        subpartition p_france values ('FR'),
        subpartition p_other values (DEFAULT))
        (partition before_2008 values less than (to_date('01-JAN-2008','DD-MON-YYYY'))); The data loaded falls into the partitions and subpartitions correctly. All the partitions names are system generated.
    When I come to partition exchange for all the 'FR' subpartitions- I can't determine the logic.
    Using
        Alter table test_table
        exchange subpartition system_generated_name
        with table TEST_TABLE_ARCH;I can swap out a specific 'known' subpartition.
    I know you can use the 'for' logic with Oracle 11g but can't get the syntax to work.
    Any ideas?

    The error means you are trying to swap a partition that still contains data in a configuration where OWB expects an empty partition. How did you set the "Replace existing data in Target Partition" configuration parameter?
    Also, for more details on PEL, review the 10.19 to 10.27 pages of the user manual.
    Regards:
    Igor

  • Partition exchange loading with a cube as target

    The owb does'nt generate pel-code, if we use a cube as the target of the mapping. There are no error messages, but the package does'nt contain the pel-code. If we use a normal partitioned table as the target, the codes is generated. Does anybody know if this (cube as a target of a pel-Mapping) is supported by the owb or wether we have to use a normal table.

    This sounds like a bug. PEL should at least inform users about why it doesn't show up. Please file an iTAR with Oracle Support and include a MDL file.

  • Hard disc wont partition to load bootcamp It says that the disk cannot be partitioned because some files cannot be moved

    Using Bootcamp Assistant I cant partition my harddrive - get message "The disk cannot be partitioned because some files cannot be moved"    The following instructions have been followed with no result "Back up the disk and use Disk Utility to format it as a single MAC OS Extended (Journaled) volume.    Restore your information to the disk and try using Boot Camp Assistant again."    This is a bit sketchy for someone like me.   Do I back up the whole system ie the OS as well or just my data?    Can anyone help please?

    First take a look at this docuemnt, http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2414.   When you backup your hard drive it is best to back up all files and the OS, a better option would be to clone the hard drive with Carbon Copy Cloner. 

  • Partition exchange doumentation problems

    Oracle 10gR2 EE / Aix5L
    I have a partitioned table on which the primary key is DISABLE VALIDATE and want to exchange a single table with a partition.
    I did that because documentation "UNIQUE Constraints in a Data Warehouse" says :
    "However, there are trade-offs for the data warehouse administrator to consider with DISABLE VALIDATE constraints. Because this constraint is disabled, no DML statements that modify the unique column are permitted against the sales table. You can use one of two strategies for modifying this table in the presence of a constraint:
    * Use DDL to add data to this table (such as exchanging partitions)..."
    Problem #1 :
    "Because this constraint is disabled, no DML statements that modify the unique column are permitted against the sales table."
    That sentence lets suppose that DELETEs or UPDATEs (columns different from PK) should be permitted cause they won't break the uniqueness. That's false. In fact, no DML statements at all are permitted.
    Problem #2 : It's impossible to exchange a single table with a partition when PK is disable Validate (ORA-25132 : UNIQUE constraint (string.string) disabled and validated in ALTER TABLE EXCHANGE PARTITION
    Cause: cannot ALTER TABLE EXCHANGE PARTITION when the partition and the table have a disabled and validated unique constraints AND the unique keys in the partion is not mutually exclusive from the rest of the table.)
    The only way to succeed is to NOValidate the PK, exchange the table and the partition, and Validate the PK. I precise that "Validate PK" succeeds and means that "the unique keys in the partion IS mutually exclusive from the rest of the table."
    Some explanations or advices...
    Thanks for reading my message.

    jpsql wrote:
    For those interested.
    Yes, it is possible to exchange a single table with a partition. The PK of the single table was not VALIDATE. The PK of the partitioned table and the one of the single table have to be both DISBABLED and VALIDATED.Could you elaborate a bit on this? What was exactly the difference to your initial setup? I think I understand that the PK of your unpartitioned table was initially NOT VALIDATED (status ENABLED/DISABLED?) whereas the PK on your partitioned table was VALIDATED, but DISABLED. Now you've VALIDATED the PK of your unpartitioned table (and DISABLED it?) and then you were able to perform the exchange partition without an error message?
    Regards,
    Randolf
    Oracle related stuff blog:
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
    SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

  • Exchange Load Generator 2013 "well known" profiles

    We are about to start testing Exchange 2013 implementation in new centralised configuration.  We have figures for current user behaviour and need to ensure system can support expected workload.
    Cannot find accurate documentation that describes what's in the 'well-known' profiles for Exchange load generator 2013.  In previous versions, there were 'light', 'medium', 'heavy' and 'extraheavy' profiles that were totally defined within Loadgen. 
    The only references I can find are in the Exchange Load Generator word document that encourages the use of these without defining any of them. 
    The only sample I can find is in the profiles directory where there is how-to.txt that has an example of a customized MailboxStoreProfile with WellKnownProfileType "150M".

    Like I said in my response to your other post in this thread, I wouldn't try to be too clever with this tool.  Tune the parameters to get the number of IOPS you want in your disk subsystem, and then measure the performance.  If you can get the
    required I/O performance, i.e., 10ms maximum average log write latency and 20ms maximum average database read latency with peaks not exceeding 100ms, while sustaining the required number of IOPS, your storage subsystem is good.
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Performing an HRMS Load

    Hi friends,
    Im new to informatica OBIA DAC world and im learning it up to now. Im in the verge of performing ETL load for HR analytics.
    I have a Oracle Source r12 instance with Oracle 11g database and my Oracle target database is 10.2.0.1.0. I need to perform an HRMS load from my source to target using Informatica. So, as of first step how will i need to connect and import source r12 instance hrms data's to my DAC to perform ETL inorder to load my target database.
    Hope u understand.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Saro

    Dear Svee,
    Thanks for the reply again, yes like you said i checked the custom properties of my Integration service
    It is like below
    Name: value
    SiebelUnicodeDB: apps@test biapps@obia
    overrideMpltVarWithMapVar: yes
    ServerPort: 4006
    SiebleUnicodeDBFlag: NoAs it is already set to 'Yes'.
    For one of my failed Workflow "SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSValidationTableDataTmpLoad" in the workflow monitor i right clicked it and selected Get Workflow Log, in that i got those following details like
    2012-07-23 10:19:01 : INFO : (1164 | 2556) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36435 : Starting execution of workflow [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] in folder [SDE_ORA11510_Adaptor] last saved by user [Administrator].
    2012-07-23 10:19:01 : INFO : (1164 | 2556) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_44206 : Workflow SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad started with run id [463], run instance name [], run type [Concurrent Run Disabled].
    2012-07-23 10:19:01 : INFO : (1164 | 2556) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_44195 : Workflow [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] service level [SLPriority:5,SLDispatchWaitTime:1800].
    2012-07-23 10:19:01 : INFO : (1164 | 2556) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_44253 : Workflow started. Clients will be notified
    2012-07-23 10:19:01 : INFO : (1164 | 2556) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36330 : Start task instance [Start]: Execution started.
    2012-07-23 10:19:01 : INFO : (1164 | 2556) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36318 : Start task instance [Start]: Execution succeeded.
    2012-07-23 10:19:01 : INFO : (1164 | 2556) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36505 : Link [Start --> SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad]: empty expression string, evaluated to TRUE.
    2012-07-23 10:19:01 : INFO : (1164 | 2556) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36388 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] is waiting to be started.
    2012-07-23 10:19:01 : INFO : (1164 | 2556) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36682 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad]: started a process with pid [4732] on node [node01_BIAPPS].
    2012-07-23 10:19:01 : INFO : (1164 | 2556) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36330 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad]: Execution started.
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : ERROR : (1164 | 1380) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : VAR_27086 : Cannot find specified parameter file [D:\Informatica\PowerCenter8.6.1\server\infa_shared\SrcFiles\SDE_ORA11510_Adaptor.SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad.txt] for [session [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad.SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad]].
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : INFO : (1164 | 1552) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36488 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] : [TM_6793 Fetching initialization properties from the Integration Service. : (Mon Jul 23 10:19:01 2012)]
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : INFO : (1164 | 1552) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36488 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] : [DISP_20305 The [Preparer] DTM with process id [4732] is running on node [node01_BIAPPS].
    : (Mon Jul 23 10:19:01 2012)]
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : INFO : (1164 | 1552) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36488 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] : [PETL_24036 Beginning the prepare phase for the session.]
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : INFO : (1164 | 1552) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36488 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] : [TM_6721 Started [Connect to Repository].]
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : INFO : (1164 | 1552) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36488 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] : [TM_6722 Finished [Connect to Repository].  It took [0.21875] seconds.]
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : INFO : (1164 | 1552) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36488 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] : [TM_6794 Connected to repository [Oracle_BI_DW_Base] in domain [Domain_BIAPPS] as user [Administrator] in security domain [Native].]
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : INFO : (1164 | 1552) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36488 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] : [TM_6721 Started [Fetch Session from Repository].]
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : INFO : (1164 | 1552) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36488 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] : [TM_6722 Finished [Fetch Session from Repository].  It took [0.140625] seconds.]
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : INFO : (1164 | 1552) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36488 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] : [TM_6793 Fetching initialization properties from the Integration Service. : (Mon Jul 23 10:19:02 2012)]
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : ERROR : (1164 | 1552) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36488 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] : [CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Mon Jul 23 10:19:02 2012]]
    2012-07-23 10:19:02 : ERROR : (1164 | 1552) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36488 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] : [PETL_24049 Failed to get the initialization properties from the master service process for the prepare phase [Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad]: Unable to read variable definition from parameter file [D:\Informatica\PowerCenter8.6.1\server\infa_shared\SrcFiles\SDE_ORA11510_Adaptor.SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad.txt].] with error code [32694552].]
    2012-07-23 10:19:04 : ERROR : (1164 | 364) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36320 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad]: Execution failed.
    2012-07-23 10:19:04 : WARNING : (1164 | 364) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36331 : Session task instance [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] failed and its "fail parent if this task fails" setting is turned on.  So, Workflow [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad] will be failed.
    2012-07-23 10:19:04 : ERROR : (1164 | 364) : (IS | Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service) : node01_BIAPPS : LM_36320 : Workflow [SDE_ORA_Flx_EBSSegDataTmpLoad]: Execution failed.
    Whether is this log is pointing out to the correct reason for that task to be failed. If so, from the above log what is the reason for the failure for that workflow.
    Kindly help me with this svee.
    Thanks for your help.
    Regards,
    Saro

  • Disk Utility - Partition map needs repair because a data partition needs loader space.

    I just finished setting up both my OSX and Windows installs from scratch after fitting an SSD, which in-turn was right before my logic board died and Apple replaced it, now it looks like I have some sort of hard drive issue brewing.
    This was my plan for the SSD, and how it currently displays in Disk Utility although that wasn't the case earlier:
    And in Terminal:
    My intention was to have two boot partitions for each OS, 'Macintosh HD' and 'Win 7 Pro' and a third shared data partition 'Projects' on the SSD, which I made in Drive Genius after installing Boot Camp. I don't want Macintosh HD accessible from Windows because I'll be using Paragon HFS+ or MacDrive to give write access and don't want OSs stomping on other OSs turf, hence needing three partitions. Everything looked fine until I just checked Disk Management under windows and realised it couldn't see the Projects volume. Even though it's fine in OS X, it was just marked black/unallocated space.
    So I booted back into OSX, all my files look fine so I ran Disk Utility and the Partition tab looked really odd - unfortunately I didn't get a screenshot. All volumes reported their size correctly but visually, Macintosh HD took up most of the drive. I could see 'Windows 7 Pro' under this, but the Partition Layout section had a scrollbar, which if I scrolled down showed 'Projects' squished into a tiny gap at the bottom. I ran a Verify, which reported no problems, and at some time since the Partition Layout has reverted to how it should look (as in the screenshot above), with 'Projects' book-ended by "Macintosh HD' and 'Windows 7 Pro'.
    Now when I run a Verify on Macintosh HD or Projects volumes, it says there's no problem, but if I run one on the drive, I get this message:
    Volume Macintosh HD on disk0s2 has 0 bytes of trailing loader space and it needs 134217728 bytes
    Problems were found with the partition map which might prevent booting
    Error: Partition map needs repair because a data partition needs loader space.
    I've only managed to find one other mention of this error here, but the fix is not relevant to me because I don't have Sophos installed. I've tried Single User/Safe Mode but it just boots into normal mode, so I can't do a fsck -fy.
    ** /dev/rdisk0s2 (NO WRITE)
    Can't open /dev/rdisk0s2: Permission denied
    That value in bytes is exactly 128mb, so I suspect the problem lies with one of the invisible partitions that show up in iPartition and Disk Management under Windows, but not in Disk Utility. I have backups and I suspect the root of the problem is partitioning in iPartition after installing Boot Camp, but I've never had issues with this approach in the past so I'm wary of just giving up and reinstalling Windows again will be massive hassle because I no longer have a SuperDrive and last time it refused to install from USB.
    Anyone have any idea what's going on? It seems like the sort of issue Disk Utility should just handle, at least in Recovery mode, but it's not playing ball. It also doesn't seem like a massive problem since my files all look fine and performance is OK, so I'm reluctant to do anything major.
    I'll update with a shot of the drive in Disk Management from Windows in a few minutes, in case that sheds light on anything. Thanks!

    Similar issue here. I manually partitioned my hard disk for triple boot (using Gparted on Linux), then everything was just fine until I ran bootcamp, to do something as simple as create a boot USB.
    I get the same error as a result and have to work my way into booting, by resorting first to a Linux live USB, then restarting from the live USB, to finally reach my rEFInd boot manager, or whichever boot manager should be initialized at startup.
    I suppose that the cause in my case is that some operation "scratched" the protective MBR. See this:
    http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.23/23.03/APMtoGPT/index.html
    I am hoping to fix it using an external Yosemite installation media: see this guide -
    http://www.macworld.com/article/2367748/how-to-make-a-bootable-os-x-10-10-yosemi te-install-drive.html
    And as a last resort to reinstall.
    I'll admit I am negatively surprised. I need this computer for professional reasons, and for the sake of "preserving the integrity of OSX", measures defined by Apple instead tend to make partitions far easier to damage. And this problem seems to affect a number of users.
    As for what I have to go through to fix it: a 5GB download, during which I have to register my credit card to the Apple Store. "Pay first, get your free software next."
    IF Disk Utility can fix it, from the external media, then fair enough. The hassle is unpleasant but it files as "a choice".
    Otherwise you can file it safely under software design calamity.

  • Error 58 The specified server cannot perform the requested operation

    Hello,
    I will try to explain the situation as brief as possible. Next to our current existing MDT environment (MDT2010 on Windows 2008 R2) we are no building a new system (MDT2013 on WIndows 2012 R2). We have multiple sites and the MDT deployment share is setup
    in DFRS share so every site is getting the same deployment information and replication is done automatically. This has been working firn for 3 years with the old system and also with the new environment it was working fine in our own subnet. But when after
    i have setup the remote MDT and WDS servers it is not working in these remote sites. The images are loading fine but for some reason the win PE is not connecting to the shares on the windows 2012 server in our site. When i manuualy connect from a remote win
    PE to our server i always get the error: system error 58 has occured. The specified server cannot perform the requested operation.
    I have been doing some troubleshooting and it seems i only got this issue when i connect from win PE 5.0 to a windows 2012 R2 server in a remote subnet.
    When i use win PE 5.0 and connect to a windows 2012 R2 share in the same subnet it connects fine. 
    When i use win PE 5.0 and connect to a windows 2008 R2 share in a remote subnet it connects fine
    When i use an older win PE and i connect to a windows 2012 R2 share in a remote subnet it connects fine
    When i use win PE 5.0 and connect to a windows 2012 R2 share in a remote subnet it does NOT connect and gives the above error
    The problem is that this problem also does not occure in Windows 7, after the machine was build by MDT and get into the OS i can connect without a problem to the windows 2012 R2 shares.
    Checking the event viewer on the 2012 R2 server that is hosting the shares i see that the following events are created:
    4624: An account was successfully logged on.
    Subject:
    Security ID:
    NULL SID
    Account Name:
    Account Domain:
    Logon ID:
    0x0
    Logon Type: 3
    Impersonation Level: Impersonation
    New Logon:
    Security ID:
    domain\username
    Account Name:
    username
    Account Domain: domain
    Logon ID:
    0x1F1FC0
    Logon GUID:
    {8e360e91-001b-c726-84a6-e7281a4bcac8}
    Process Information:
    Process ID:
    0x0
    Process Name:
    Network Information:
    Workstation Name:
    Source Network Address:
    x.x.x.x
    Source Port:
    60077
    Detailed Authentication Information:
    Logon Process:
    Kerberos
    Authentication Package:
    Kerberos
    Transited Services:
    Package Name (NTLM only):
    Key Length:
    0
    This event is generated when a logon session is created. It is generated on the computer that was accessed.
    The subject fields indicate the account on the local system which requested the logon. This is most commonly a service such as the Server service, or a local process such as Winlogon.exe or Services.exe.
    The logon type field indicates the kind of logon that occurred. The most common types are 2 (interactive) and 3 (network).
    The New Logon fields indicate the account for whom the new logon was created, i.e. the account that was logged on.
    The network fields indicate where a remote logon request originated. Workstation name is not always available and may be left blank in some cases.
    The impersonation level field indicates the extent to which a process in the logon session can impersonate.
    The authentication information fields provide detailed information about this specific logon request.
    - Logon GUID is a unique identifier that can be used to correlate this event with a KDC event.
    - Transited services indicate which intermediate services have participated in this logon request.
    - Package name indicates which sub-protocol was used among the NTLM protocols.
    - Key length indicates the length of the generated session key. This will be 0 if no session key was requested.
    5140: 
    A network share object was accessed.
    Subject:
    Security ID:
    domain\username
    Account Name:
    username
    Account Domain: domain
    Logon ID:
    0x1F1FC0
    Network Information:
    Object Type:
    File
    Source Address:
    x.x.x.x
    Source Port:
    60077
    Share Information:
    Share Name:
    \\*\Captures
    Share Path:
    \??\D:\Captures
    Access Request Information:
    Access Mask:
    0x1
    Accesses:
    ReadData (or ListDirectory)
    4634: 
    An account was logged off.
    Subject:
    Security ID:
    domain\username
    Account Name:
    username
    Account Domain: domain
    Logon ID:
    0x1F1FC0
    Logon Type: 3
    This event is generated when a logon session is destroyed. It may be positively correlated with a logon event using the Logon ID value. Logon IDs are only unique between reboots on the same computer.
    Anyone an idea why this is happening?

    Hi,
    We can refer to the following blog for MDT troubleshooting:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2012/05/08/mdt-2010-amp-2012-my-deployment-failed-what-and-where-are-logs-i-should-review.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Vincent Wu
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  • Unable to expand DG is Lync client - Cannot perform this action, and the cause is unknown.

    Hi,
    I have a user in our Hong Kong office that is unable to open a distribution group she has added to her Groups. She gets the error message "Cannot perform this action, and the cause is unknown. Contact your support team to investigate."
    I can add the group and expand it, so can some of her colleague, and some cannot. Her colleagues who can have the same client and global policy settings as she does. 
    I read in a similar thread that this could be resolved by confirming the server times on Lync, AD (domain controller checked and Exchange but they were all correct and in sync. 
    The global policy is set to 250 max contacts - but does a DL count as 1 contact, or does it count all the people within the DG? I am getting HK to confirm she does not have too many contacts but I dont think this is the issue. 
    Anyone else come across this issue?
    Phil

    You can run the command Test-CsGroupExpansion to test the ability of a user to employ group expansion.
    For the usage of the command, you can check
     http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg399009.aspx
    Lisa Zheng
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for