Run time engine and NI-DAQmx installation order

Greetings Fellow Developers:
I'm looking at a product manual that contains instructions to install NI-DAQmx, a product software installer created with LabVIEW 2009 SP1 Full and then the LabVIEW 2009 Run Time Engine in that order.
This does not seem correct--particularly if a LabVIEW 8 (or previous) Run Time Engine is already installed.
Since I need to test installation of my builds before distribution I'll need to install them on machines that have never had any NI products and also on machines that may have previous Run Time Engines.
I feel the correct order is to install the Run Time Engine, NI-DAQmx and THEN the application.  Prior to running the application the USB device should be plugged in so the 'add hardware wizard' can install the USB driver(s).
What is the consensus on this?
Warm Regards,
Saturn
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hello Saturn,
Could you point out the location of the product manual that explains this order?  Typically, when installing National Instruments products, in particular LabVIEW, we recommend installing LabVIEW, drivers, and toolkits in that order.  So, installing the LabVIEW 2009 Run-Time Engine, DAQmx, and then your application should be the proper installation process.
Regards,
Roman Sandoval | National Instruments | RF Systems Engineer

Similar Messages

  • LabVIEW Run Time Engine and ActiveX Automation Server

    Hi,
    I have a question related to LabVIEW Run Time Engine and ActiveX Automation Server:
    We have a tool developed in LabVIEW and TestStand. End user interface is a LabVIEW GUI (it's an executable) which executes TestStand sequences. Some TestStand sequences call lower level LabVIEW VIs.
    Everything works fine with LabVIEW installed, but I was wondering if I could run this tool on deployment machine with only LabVIEW run time engine installed. We are using LabVIEW 6.1 and with only the run time engine installed, I get the error message: "Unable to launch the 'LabVIEW.Application' ActiveX automation server ". 
    BTW, we are planning to upgrade the versions soon.
    Is it possible to make things work only with the run time engine?
    Thank you.

    Thanks for the response, Brian.
    I did upgrade to LabVIEW 8.0 and TestStand 3.5. Everything works fine on the development computer where LabVIEW and TestStand is installed. On the target computer in the lab, I installed LV RTE 8.0 and TestStand 3.5, and now when a VI is called in a sequence file, I get the following:
    RunState.PreviousStep.Result.Error.Code  -18002 
    RunState.PreviousStep.Result.Error.Msg  "LabVIEW: The VI is not executable"
    So, the executable opens and works fine (which means that the LV RTE is installed properly), but when a sequence calls a low level VI, it does not make it through.
    comments/suggestions are appreciated. Thanks.

  • LabVIEW Run-time Engine 7.1.1 installation failure on Windows 7 SP 1 32-bit

    I am attempting an installation of LabVIEW Run-time Engine 7.1.1 on my Windows 7 SP1 32-bit OS computer and the installation hangs.  This happens near the beginning.  Is there a compatibility issue?  The window does not have any error messages.  It says: "Updating System, The features you selected are currently being installed."  The progress indicator blinks periodically, but does not move forward.  Please help.  Thanks!

    I recently tried to install the LabVIEW 7.0 runtime engine on my Windows 7 (64 bit) machine to try out an old software. Ended up removing it quickly again, since any LabVIEW version I started up after that, including LabVIEW 2013 showed an installation dialog on startup about (updating installation information, please wait!).
    Basically there are so many possible problems why it could fail. Apparently the runtime engine installer had played with some other NI component that he had no idea would ever exist when it was created and caused that component to always think it needed to update itself to finalize its installation. In your case it could be anything from a missing Visual C runtime version framework that the installer simply expects to be present but doesn't since Microsoft has in the meantime released about 5 versions of Visual C and doesn't install all runtime versions anymore on newest Windows. Or it could be a conflict with your hyper-duper .Net Framework 4.5.x.y that the installer does not be prepared for. Maybe that or something else was not present on your 64 Bit machine where you could install the runtime engine.
    Basically the reasons for the install to fail are legion, and trying to figure it out is always more hassle than moving on and let old software be old software.

  • Uninstall LabVIEW but leave run-time engine and DAQmx

    Hoping there is an easier way to do this, basicall we are developing software on a customers computer that we buy and will eventually ship to them. However we can't ship them LabVIEW so we make an executable and just keep the run time, DAQmx and MAX. Is there anyway to do this easier than uninstalling LabVIEW and reinstalling everything else?
    Windows 7
    LV2013

    Under Windows, try going to Control Panel | Programs and Features and find National Instruments Software. You might be able to select all except the run-time, DAQmx and MAX, then select uninstall. If not, then perhaps consider just making a full installer for your LabVIEW executable solution, this will clearly install only the necessary components for your code to work (if it's LabVIEW 2013).
    Thoric (CLA, CLED, CTD and LabVIEW Champion)

  • How do I create installer that checks the available Run Time Engine on the target system

    Hi,
    I am looking for a soultion on custom Installer where this Installer once done with the Installation should be capable of checking the presence of Runtime Engine on the target system. I amaware of including/checking the LV RTE checkbox for such options and we are working on some other concept. The thing is we would like to give the user a pop-up or any message that shows the presence of Runtime engine on the target system after finishing the installation. In case the runtime engine is not already installed on the target system, this time the message will be for the link to get the .exe and close the installation. 
    Overall we would like to minimize the size of our Installer that in case will get increased if we include Run Time Engine along with the Installer. 
    I am also assuming that such checking can be done through Advanced Tab in the Installer properties by including any such .exe for performing those things but looking for more options if possible to get it done. 
    Please do let me know if someone has any idea about it. 
    Thnaks in Advance,
    Vivek

    Hi teststand,
    you can start another program which checks if the rte is available. It should also be possible with only a batch file.
    Mike

  • VISA Write differs between TS Development System and LV Run-Time Engine

    Hi all
    I made an application on LabVIEW to test BERs (Bit Error Rates), and I used VISA Write between two COM ports to exchange data.
    Everything works fine using just LabVIEW.
    Afterwards, I used TestStand to call my application (VI). The LabVIEW adapters from TestStand were set to Development System by default, and everything works OK!!
    Finally, I needed to disable the development system, and set the LabVIEW adapters from TestStand to LabVIEW Run-Time Engine and I notice that the speed of the data exchange between the two COM ports decreased dramatically.
    The only difference was the speed...because all the data (changed slowly in this case) arrived correctly on the other COM port too.
    The symptom was the same as decreasing the baud rate...but the baud rate and all the other configurations remained the same. The only difference was the change between Develpment System to Run-Time Engine to notice this decreased speed between the exchanged data using VISA Write.
    Any solutions for this?
    Thanks in advance
    Joao
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Joao,
    you state that using the LV Developement System as execution platform for your LV code modules result in faster datatransfer between the COM ports than using the LV Run-Time Engine.
    So i am pondering: Does this refer to TS at all?
    Please check the following:
    Run you communication using a sole LV application in LV Developement System. This should be fast. Now build an executable of this application and run that one. Do you see the same behavior?
    If there is no difference in a sole LV approach, there have to be some settings in the TS approach making this slow. So please let us know:
    Are there different modules involved in that data transfer (which in fact points to the reply Christophe made)?
    What about loading/unloading options of the modules?
    How big is the hierarchy of the modules, e.g. is it necessary for the RTE to load stuff the Dev Env has already in memory due to loading a lvproj.......?
    Could you provide a simple example sequence+modules showing this behavior?
    What versions of LV and TS are you using?
    hope this helps,
    Norbert
    CEO: What exactly is stopping us from doing this?
    Expert: Geometry
    Marketing Manager: Just ignore it.

  • Run-Time Engine 7.0 and Excel

    I found out that Run-Time Engine 7.0 running executable generated at LabVIEW 7.0 environment (code written in LabVIEW 7.1 but save as 7.0) cannot open Excel 2000 files. If I replace Excel 2000 with Excel 2003 application on my pc, the executable code will open the Excel file (Run-Time Engine 7.0 works with Excel 2003).
    Is the Excel 2003 and higher versions will only work with Run-Time Engine 7.0 and higher code?
    How can I make executables using Run-Time Engine 7.0 work with Excel 2000 (Windows 98 operating system)??? (I cannot change Excel and Run-Time Engine and OS versions due to limitations, how can I work with what I have?).
    Thanks for your help.
    Regards,
    LVLV

    Duplicate post.

  • Unable to locate labview run time engine (lab view 8.5)

    Hello I have a problem whit the labview 8.5 installer. I have created I project with included a .vi file (a simple panel wich control a serial port, with parameters (baud rate, stop bits, ...)), then I have created an application for this file (.exe) and then the installer (I have included the labview run time engine 8.5). When I run the setup.exe  I have the following error message:
    Unable to locate labview run time engine, the application require a labview run time engine 8.5 or compatible...
    What I'm missing??
    Thanks
    Maurizio

    are there one other reasons why it would not work.  I have asimilar problem.
    I intsalled version 8 of run time engine and acrtivated software.  Now I am trying to run compiled application provided to me by third party.
    When I click on application it says
    Unable to locate LV run time engine
    Test server requires a version 6.0 or compatible LV engine.
    How do I know if the engine I installed and activated is running and is it supposed to be able to execute a program which is expectin rev 6 of the rund engine?

  • How to install Vision run-time engine to a desktop PC converted to real-time target

    Hi, all
    I don't know how can I install the vision run-time engine to a desktop PC which I converted to a real-time target.  The same problem applies to installing real-time run-time engine and labview run-time engine to the real-time target.  The only way to install software to real-time target is through "add/remove software" in MAX for remote system, but it is not for all types of run-time engine installation.  
    I am also confused about how to activate those run-time engines for the desktop PC as real-time target.
    Please help and great thanks.
    Wei 

    Hi turtle,
    Here is a link that explains how to set up a desktop PC as a real-time target.  The section for Formatting & Setup should help you the most.
    NI Developer Zone Tutorial: Requirements for Desktop PCs as LabVIEW Real-Time Targets
    Justin D.
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • How to prevent prompt to install CVI Run-Time Engine?

    The LabVIEW laptop for my client got messed up, so I spent several hours making it forget everything it ever knew about NI software.  I started by uninstalling all NI applications, then manually deleted all the folders that the uninstaller leaves behind, then ran a couple of registry cleaners to sweep out as much NI as possible, and finally ran regedit to see what was left.  In the end there were only some legacy drivers that regedit would not let me delete.
    Then I installed 8.6.1 from DVD, carefully selecting only the options we needed; LabVIEW core, cRIO, FPGA, PID, and the minimum set of drivers the installer would let me get away with.  Note that no Labwindows/CVI option boxes were checked.  When the installation was complete, I rebooted the machine and launched LabVIEW, which immediately prompted me to install the LabWindows/CVI 8.5.1 (not 8.6.1) Run-Time Engine.  I dutifully fed it my 8.6.1 DVD, which caused LabVIEW to crash.  After 3 reboot/retry cycles with the same result, I decided to appeal to the forum for help.
    What is causing LabVIEW to think I need the CVI Run-Time Engine (and a down-rev version, at that), and how do I convince LabVIEW that I do not?
    Jeff

    Thanks for the reply!  OK, so LabVIEW needs the CVI RTE even though I'm not using any CVI features.  I can live with that.  I downloaded LabWindows/CVI Run-Time Engine 8.5 from the NI web site and tried to install it.  After I confirmed that I accepted whatever that license agreement says, the installer told me that "No software will be installed or removed."
    Then I opened LabVIEW, and it went through the same "The feature you are trying to use..." popup and tried to install the CVI RTE.  The installation failed as usual, and LabVIEW crashed.
    A few minutes ago I found and ran CVTRTE.msi on the 8.6.1 distribution DVD.  I selected the "repair" option, which completed successfully.  After rebooting, I launched LabVIEW only to be greeted with the now-hated NI LabWindows/CVI 8.5.1 Run-Time Engine installer.
    The part of this that is so infuriating is that there appears to be no way for anyone to make a computer forget everything NI so you can start with a clean slate.
    Jeff
    Attachments:
    NoCanDo.jpg ‏28 KB

  • I have trouble in building stand-alone application, "you must intall Labview run-time engine on any computer on which you want to run this application"

    I have installed the LabVIEW 7.0 run time engine and checked all in the advanced setup on the installer setup slide. but I still get such a message saying that the target computer needs to have LabVIEW 7.0 run-time engine. What I want is a real stand-alone application even without having labview ... I used to think that's due to my program contains MATLAB nodes. But this is not true, since even without Matlab, it's still wrong. Please help, thanks!!!

    As was stated elsewhere, you have the option of building the runtime engine into your application when you build it. However, you can also create a "runtime engine application" by simply opening the application builder and doing a build without adding any source code files. The result is a small program (named lvrt.exe) that can run any LabVIEW code--whether or not its built into an executable.
    Such an application can be helpful if you are wanting to install several LV-based applications on the same computer in that it reduces the amount of redundant code on disk. All you have to do is make sure that Windows on the target computer associates the llb and vi file extensions with the runtime engine program.
    It can also be helpful during testing to run test code that isn't built into an executable.
    Mike...
    Certified Professional Instructor
    Certified LabVIEW Architect
    LabVIEW Champion
    "... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
    Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

  • How can I uninstall Labview run time engine from the machine?

    I understand that Labview has not given any provision to show customized 'License Agreement screen'. Isn't it? This is the main cause of my problem. Since I want to show our own license agreement (LA) screen, I made the one using Labview. To show this license agreement screen, I first install a small application which has only this LA screen with Labview run time engine. The customer can see License Agreement Screen with Labview Run Time Engine on his machine. If My customer accepts the LA, I will install the main application further by calling another setup.EXE file.
    If my customer selects 'Do Not Agree' to the LA, I will quit the installation process. Here I also want to 'uninstall' Labview Run Time Engine
    from his machine since he doesn't accept License. I would like to know how to uninstall Labview run time engine from his machine?
    Another way which I could think is to run the LA screen from the CD with Labview run time engine on the CD. I will start installing the main S/W to the customer's machine with LABview Run Time Engine only after he accepts License agreement. I would like to know how to run the Labview application from CD without installing run time engine on the target machine?
    Can anyone suggest solution to my problem?
    Thanks,
    Chander

    J-Tek,
    I would suggest re-installing the Run-time Engine and then uninstalling it after a reboot. Also, you can download a program called Msicuu.exe (for NT, 2000, XP or Msicu.exe for 9x) to help clean up the registry for uninstalled programs.
    Randy Hoskin
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments
    http://www.ni.com/ask

  • Distribute application without labview run-time engine

    I read a lot of post saying if the target machine has the same run-time engine installed, then I don't need to distribute the application with labview run-time engine. Somehow this rules doesn't work for me. I have a PC installed labview 2010 development system and has run-time engine 2011 SP1. I also download the same version of run-time engine and installed it in a target PC. When I distribute my labview application, if I select to include the run-time engine in build properties, the application will be able to install and run properly in the target machine; If I don't include the run-time engine, then I wouldn't be able to run the application.
    Does anyone help me on this? I don't want to always build the application with the run-time engine since it's quite big
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Could you take a look at my NI software list and let me know what labview run-time engine is really in use?
    And in build properties, it actually list addition installer include labview run time engine SP1. If I includes this version of run-time engine and run the installer in target machine, it will still install the run-time engines just like there is no run-time engine installed in the target machine before.
    Attachments:
    NI software.jpg ‏98 KB
    Installer.jpg ‏216 KB

  • UNABLE TO LOCATE THE THE LABVIEW RUN-TIME ENGINE.LVBROKERAUX71

    UNABLE TO LOCATE THE THE LABVIEW RUN-TIME ENGINE.LVBROKERAUX71 REQUIRES A VERSION 7.1 (OR COMPATIBLE) LABVIEW RUN-TIME ENGINE。PLEASE CONTACT THE VENDOR OF LVBROKERAUX71 TO CORRECT THIS PROBLEM
    Uninstalled DAQ and reinstalled.  MAX still throws an error. 
    Any Isead besides uninstalling 3/4 of my software?
    Merry Christmas!
    Matthew Fitzsimons
    Certified LabVIEW Architect
    LabVIEW 6.1 ... 2013, LVOOP, GOOP, TestStand, DAQ, and Vison

    To clean up your system, you will need to uninstall the LabVIEW 7.1 run-time engine, and the "LVBroker," and the "LVBrokerAux71" components using the MSI Blast utility.  To obtain this utility, please create a service request for phone or e-mail support, and contact one of our Applications Engineers about this issue.  Thank you!

  • Error 1722 when uninstalling Labview run-time engine 7.1.1

    I have been trying to uninstall all NI software so I can start off with a clean slate. I have been going to the control panel under add/remove programs to remove the NI stuff. Everything is gone except the Labview run-time engine 7.1.1. Everytime i try to remove it, i get teh 1722 error followed by the 1603 error. I've tried repairing it but I still get the same results when i try to remove it agian. I've also tried removing it with MSI Blast. This did not work either. I've gone through the registry and manually deleted anything related to NI and that still didn't work. Is there anything else I could try?
    Thanks,
    Nick

    Hey Steve,
    I have tried repairing it through the control panel.
    I tried reinstalling just the run-time engine and it said it was already installed. So I reinstalled Labview 7.1 and repaired the 7.1.1 run-time engine through the control panel. Then I uninstalled everything. Thanks for all your help
    Thanks again,
    Nick
    Message Edited by Nick_C on 03-12-2007 03:57 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Songs are on my iPod but no longer in iTunes

    Hello everyone, I just had some computer work done and had to re-install iTunes (the latest version). When I open it up it still shows all the song titles I had before and the correct number of songs. HOWEVER the majority of them won't play. When I t

  • A/R Invoice Won't Close

    Hi, We have an A/R Invoice for $3065.  An incoming payment was done for $3000.98.  A credit memo was created against the invoice for $64.02.  For some reason, the invoice didn't close.  There is nothing to manually reconcile. How can we get the invoi

  • Most allocated extents in any segment

    hi gurus My db is oracle with HP-UX In rz20 -- database-oraclesegmentsin that most allocated extents in any segment-  is showing red.how to rectify this problem. and y its shoing red wht is the problem and how can i solved this. thanks/regards

  • Using Sockets with BufferedInputStream

    Hi, Many thanks in advance for any help or advice. I have been struggling with this for a while now. I have data comming in from a Socket. I create a BufferedInputStream like this: inputStream = new BufferedInputStream( socket.getInputStream() ); The

  • Can you run Hardware Test from older DVD?

    Hello, My mini2,1 came with OS 10.4. I have the two original system discs. SInce I bought it right before 10.5 was released, Apple sent me a single Leopard Upgrade disc. Does anyone know if the Apple Hardware Test is on the 10.5 upgrade disc? If it i