S_ALR_87012284 TABLES Stock

Hello gurus,
Please your help, I need know where its saved this information (Transparent table)
I need the table name where is saved information (Reporting period, Comparasion period etc..)
Do any one knows where can I get this?
The transaction I have used to get this information : S_ALR_87012284
I searched in these tables :
TABLES:   t001, ska1, bhdgd,
          t011, skat,
          t011t, skb1,
          t009, skc1a,
          t004,
          t009b,
          t009y.
TABLES:   rfsdo.
TABLES:   tgsb.
TABLES:   fimsg.
TABLES:   faglfreesel.
But I didn't found the information I want.
Thanks,
Luis

I think it uses a Logical Database for the data fetching. You can confirm that by checking the report properties and navigating to its LDB. LDB will list all the major tables (in hierarchical order) used for data fetching.

Similar Messages

Cross company stock transfer, in which table "stock in transfer CC"

Dear Gurus,
When I do cross company stock transfer, in which table quantity for "stock in transfer CC" will get updated?
Rgds
Sar

Hi there
Just with th report transaction MB5T
I think your purpose will be solved using that report
just check the flag cross company code in the initial screen
*the qty gets updated in the table MSEG feild MENGE.*
Reward if usefull
Sujoy
Edited by: SUJOY KUMAR PAL on Feb 15, 2008 6:07 AM

Wrong entry in the table stock transport requisition index EBUB

we have 2 plants 7080 and 6501, they belong to different company codes.
in plant 6501, after MRP run a PR is created for material 420000064,we can see entry in table EBAN as below.
Client Purchase Req. Requisn Item Document Type Doc. Category Materaial   plant
500    0014381981    00010        NB            B    000000000420000064 6501
but several days later, we found a PRqRel item appear in stock/requirement list of material 320003192 in plant 7080, and we also found entry in table EBUB:
Client Material             Supplying Plant Purchase Req. Requisn Item
500    000000000320003192   7080            0014381981    00010
this is wrong and may cause wrong goods issue, we checked a lot to find the root cause but failed.
we have doubt that it is number range issue, but after checking we don't think so.
In OMI2, here is the interval.
No. From To current number
01 0010000000 0019999999 10352698
please kindly help, what could be the possible cause of this error, any suggestion will be appreciated.

That error is supposed to be fixed in versions 4.0 and later I think you'd have to delete the unnecessary entries from EBUB using the program from the note 130136, you may have to search more SAP notes:
Report ZKOREBUB
*& Title: deletes EBUB which is not necessary                          *
REPORT ZKOREBUB .
TABLES: EBUB, EBAN.
INCLUDE FMMEXDIR.
DATA: DEL_FLAG.
SELECT-OPTIONS: S_MATNR FOR EBUB-MATNR,
                S_RESWK FOR EBUB-RESWK.
PARAMETERS: DB_UPD.          " <<< if DB_UPD = X program deletes the unnecessary entries
SELECT * FROM EBUB WHERE MATNR IN S_MATNR
                   AND   RESWK IN S_RESWK.
CLEAR DEL_FLAG.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM EBAN WHERE BANFN EQ EBUB-BANFN
                            AND   BNFPO EQ EBUB-BNFPO.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
    DEL_FLAG = 'X'.
ELSE.
    IF EBAN-RESWK NE SPACE AND EBAN-BSAKZ NE 'R' AND
       EBAN-MATNR NE SPACE AND
       EBAN-PSTYP NE PSTYP-STRE AND
       EBAN-PSTYP NE PSTYP-LOHN AND
       EBAN-PSTYP NE PSTYP-KONS AND
        EBAN-EBAKZ EQ SPACE      AND
        EBAN-LOEKZ EQ SPACE      AND
        EBAN-MENGE GT EBAN-BSMNG.
    ELSE.
      DEL_FLAG = 'X'.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
IF DEL_FLAG NE SPACE.
    WRITE: / EBUB-MATNR, EBUB-RESWK, EBUB-BANFN, EBUB-BNFPO.
    IF DB_UPD NE SPACE.
      DELETE EBUB.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDSELECT.

S_ALR_87012284 tables

hi experts,
transaction code: S_ALR_87012284
how can I find this report uses which tables ?

Hi,
On Tcode S_ALR_87012284 go to System -> Status -> Program   RFBILA00 , double click you will get the database table using for this report.
TABLES:   T001, SKA1, BHDGD,
          T011, SKAT,
          T011T, SKB1,
          T009, SKC1A,
          T004,
          T009B.
TABLES:   RFSDO.
TABLES:   TGSB.
TABLES:   FIMSG.
TABLES:   FAGLFREESEL.
Regards,
Pramitha.

Table: Stock for material

Dear All ,
which table can i find the entry whether the material stock exist or not which we see in the MMBE .
Regards

hi,
check table A501 - plant/material...
MARC - plant data for material
MARD - storage loc data for material
Or check report : MB52..
Hope it helps..
Regards
Priyanka.P
Edited by: Priyanka Paltanwale on Oct 13, 2008 9:48 AM

Selecting Records from one table where records don't exist in a linked table

Post Author: RMC
CA Forum: Crystal Reports
Tables:
Stock (Main Table)
Transactions (Left Outer Join)
Criteria:
Select all items with no transactions between a selected date range.
The items will exist in Main table but I want to select all items that haven't been in a transaction between a date range so I can identify no movement with stock items just sitting in the database doing nothing.
Any suggestions??

Post Author: yangster
CA Forum: Crystal Reports
Sorry for the delay. Dam meetings all day yesterday.You are essentially looking for something that doesn't exist in the db so you need to look at it from a different approach.You definitely don't want to use a full outer join. From what i can tell from your description above you are looking for stocks that are inactive/idle.So you need not look at data that doesn't exist but the last activity date.So you'd want something along the lines ofselect s.stock_name, s.stock_blah, max(t.transaction_date) Transaction_datefrom stocks sjoin transactions t on s.itemid = t.itemidwhere whatever restrictions you need to addgroup by s.stock_name, s.stock_blahthis will produce one record for each stock you have in the stock table showing you only the last date of activityput that in a command in crystalin the selection expert in crystal reports put in a simple criteriatransaction_date <= some datethis will only pull in records based on your date selection so if you say give me all records from dec 31, 2006 you will know all the records being pulled in are stocks that have been idle since dec 31, 2006 or earlierlet me know if this doesn't work

MSKA - Stock in Quality and Unrestricted both

Dear Experts,
Please help to solve below problem:
After UD 321 done and stock moved to Unrestricted Stock.
At time of UD Batch Status was Restricted, later it has been done Unrestricted thru MSC2N (342 movement).
But in MSKA table, stock is showing against both in Unrestricted and Quality.
How it is possible?
Regards,
Tanuj Parikh

Dear Tanuj,
Check a change document for the change in batch master record and a material document for the transfer posting.

Fill datagridview with Nested Table Object Type ???

Hello everybody, please you help me resolve my problem?
I follow this example: *(A Sample Application using Object-Relational features)* http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/appdev.101/b10799/adobjxmp.htm
And this tutorial: *(Using Oracle User-Defined Types with .NET and Visual Studio)* http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/hol08/dotnet/udt/udt_otn.htm
Now I have 3 Object Table: Stock, Customer and Purchase Order. With the tutorial it's OK to show the data of Stock and Customer Table [there is no nested table in], but I can't do this with table Purchase Order, the tutorial don't show how to work with Nested Table type [Missing or something ?]
When I try to display the data of table Purchase Order, I get the error:
typeName='LINEITEMLIST_NTABTYP'' is not specified or is invalid*
Follow the tutorial, I generate custom class for this UDT and get another error:
this.STOCK_REF = ((object)(Oracle.DataAccess.Types.OracleUdt.GetValue(con, pUdt, "STOCK_REF")));*
Argument Exception Unhandle: Object attribute is not mapped to a custom type member.*
Can You show me how to do this ? Show the data of the Nested Table in Visual Studio, do I have something wrong ??? Thanks and Best Regards.

I think you need to go through the tutorial more carefully. I think you are missing steps.
You are using a REF. Are you creating an object table for the objects to be stored in? Are you dereferencing the REF? This is covered by the Oracle by Example tutorial.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/hol08/dotnet/udt/udt_otn.htm#t11
When you receive the nested table, it will be inside a .NET class. You can create this class by using the Create Custom Class menu item on the nested table type in server explorer.
This class will contain a ToString method and a ToXML method.
The question is, where are you attempting to display the data from this nested table? In a grid?
Does it make sense to display a nested table inside one cell of a grid? No. You would need to construct a special UI that will show the
nested table. Maybe the user clicks on the cell on the grid, which opens a new grid that displays the data. Or maybe there is a second grid on the form that always shows the nested table for the row that the first grid currently has selected.
I realize I am not providing you the code... but it sounds like you need to design a more sohisticated UI than what the tutorial is using -- one that can handle displaying one additional table per row.

Regarding finding stock outs of material

Dear All,
I want to make a Z report of the number of days for which stock was Zero for a particular period.
I dont want to use Standard report MC.9 as there required to count stock out days manually.
Please guide me from which tables I can bring the required data.
Thanks All,
Rohan

Hi,
try report MB5B
or used following table
Stock tables: MARD, MSKA, MSPR, MSLB, MBEW /MBEWH
Historical stock tables- MARDH, MSPRH, MSKAH, MSLBH
MIGO TABLE: MKPF, MSEG
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Derived tables with prompts - based universe

why can't I use derived tables with prompts - based universes on Dashboard Design 4.0? I mean I can add to Dashboard Design data coming from a universe like that but the prompts don't show in the query panel in Dashboard Design. Could it be becuase my universe was created first as an unv and then I transformed it to unx?

Good day Yuvraj,
Thank you for your response.
Basically, I have 2 classes based on physical tables:
Product (P); and
Time/Calendar (T/C).
Two classed based on derived tables:
Stock on Hand (SoH); and
Stock Movements (SM)
The derived tables SQL code selects (Quantity and Selling Price) from the SoH table and joins to the T/C table with conditions and a Where clause to restrict the data output to the last 2 months (the same applies to the SM derived table).
Example code below:
SELECT q.sm_table _no, q.tim_cal_no, q.quantity, q.selling_price
FROM    tim_cal_table p,
              sm_table q
WHERE q.tim_cal_no= p.tim_cal_no
AND        p.day between to_char(sysdate - 60,'DD/MON/YY') and to_char(sysdate - 1,'DD/MON/YY');
Now, the SoH table and the SM table are joined (in the universe schema) to the P table and T/C table using Primary Keys (which are shared by all the tables - physical and derived i.e. foreign keys on the SoH and SM tables used in the derived tables).
Now to answer your questions:
Do you get data in case you take objects only from derived table class?NO
Does the columns used to join physical table and derived table has matching values? YES. I mean to say is the join getting satisfied? YES. Checked Universe Integrity - structure, objects, joins, conditions, loops, context and cardinalities - everything is OK.
Adding to this, is the data type same for both the columns (on which join is set) or is there any typecasting required? YES - checked the data types of the primary/foreign keys that join the tables and they all match, except for one on the SM table - the foreign key has 6 set for precision (instead of 5 as per the other columns), however the data type is Numeric so this shouldn't be an issue.
I hope this helps to clarify the nature of the problem.
Thank you.
Regards,
B

Nullify the stock from Blocked Stock.

Hi,
I want to nullify the stock for a materials which is lying in blocked stock. The base unit of measurement for that material lying in blocked stock is 0 Ea but the parallel unit of measurement is 3.16 KG.
Please guide how to nullify the stock for parallel unit of measurement of the material.

Hi,
Please check the below things.
1. Check the material master whetner a conversion is maintained for EA and KG.
2. You can try post the MI10 document for the blocked stock in the parallel unit.
3.Or you can transfer post to the unrestricted and post a MI10 document or a scrap moment.
4. with all the above trials if you find the error message no stock is available , then we can say that stock inconsistancy is there.
5.Then check MM03 stock MMBE stock and MC.9 stock , if there is a variation then it is a inconsistancy.
6.Check MB5b FOR the wrong posting.
If there is a inconsistancy in the tables stock raise a OSS message or apply a sap note.
Check for note on the service.sap.com
Regards,

How to block Gr if the stock reaches the maximum limits

Dear All,
Is there any way so that the system will automatically Block the GR while doing MIGO when the stock of the given material has crossed the maximum limit.
Regards
Om Prakash Gupta

Hi,
If you want to restrcit any specific material stock quantity, it means some where you need to maintain the Stock limit for that purpose you will have create a Z table whene in you will maintain sthe maximumstock limit and then with the help of user exit in PO or MIGO you can validate it with the Z Table stock . Z table for stock quantity can consider stock incremental aginst each PO and GR .
Take ABAPer's help
Regards,
Vikas

Join multiple tables to create one new table with data from all the other

CREATE TABLE NAME2012 (STOCKNAME2012 VARCHAR(255), VAL2012 FLOAT)
INSERT INTO NAME2012 VALUES (‘Stock3’, 50)
INSERT INTO NAME2012 VALUES (‘Stock2’, 55)
INSERT INTO NAME2012 VALUES (‘Stock4’, 45)
CREATE TABLE NAME2011 (STOCKNAME2011 VARCHAR(255), VAL2011 FLOAT)
INSERT INTO NAME2011 VALUES (‘Stock1’, 56)
INSERT INTO NAME2011 VALUES (‘Stock2’, 48)
INSERT INTO NAME2010 VALUES (‘Stock3’, 59)
CREATE TABLE NAME2010 (STOCKNAME2010 VARCHAR(255), VAL2010 FLOAT )
INSERT INTO NAME2010 VALUES (‘Stock1’, 47)
INSERT INTO NAME2010 VALUES (‘Stock2’, 46)
I would like a new Table STOCKS populated with names of stocks from the other tables as well as values. So I get a new table STOCKS, with data as below.
CREATE TABLE STOCKS (NAME VARCHAR(255), VALUE2012 FLOAT , VALUE2011 FLOAT, VALUE2010 FLOAT)
End result in table STOCKS should be like:
NAME               VALUE2010              VALUE2011
VALUE2012
Stock1                 47
56                           NULL
Stock2                 46
48                             50
Stock3                NULL                         59
55
Stock4                NULL                       NULL
45
How can I write a T-SQL expression that could do this?

Hi
There must be StockMaster
Try this
CREATE TABLE NAME2012 (
STOCKNAME2012 VARCHAR(255)
,VAL2012 FLOAT
INSERT INTO NAME2012
VALUES (
'Stock3'
,50
INSERT INTO NAME2012
VALUES (
'Stock2'
,55
INSERT INTO NAME2012
VALUES (
'Stock4'
,45
CREATE TABLE NAME2011 (
STOCKNAME2011 VARCHAR(255)
,VAL2011 FLOAT
INSERT INTO NAME2011
VALUES (
'Stock1'
,56
INSERT INTO NAME2011
VALUES (
'Stock2'
,48
CREATE TABLE NAME2010 (
STOCKNAME2010 VARCHAR(255)
,VAL2010 FLOAT
INSERT INTO NAME2010
VALUES (
'Stock1'
,47
INSERT INTO NAME2010
VALUES (
'Stock2'
,46
INSERT INTO NAME2010
VALUES (
'Stock3'
,59
Create table stockMaster(STOCKNAME VARCHAR(255))
go
Insert into stockMaster values('Stock1')
Insert into stockMaster values('Stock2')
Insert into stockMaster values('Stock3')
Insert into stockMaster values('Stock4')
Select Distinct S.STOCKNAME , A.VAL2010 ,B.VAL2011,C.VAL2012 from stockMaster S
left join NAME2012 C on S.STOCKNAME = C.STOCKNAME2012
left join NAME2011 B on s.STOCKNAME = B.STOCKNAME2011
left join NAME2010 A on s.STOCKNAME = A.STOCKNAME2010
go
Drop table NAME2010
Drop table NAME2011
Drop table NAME2012
Drop table stockMaster
Mark as Ans if you find it useful
Shridhar J Joshi Thanks a lot

Query - compare answers to the same questions from only ID-X in first table to all ID's in second table

Hello!
I am designing a database for a summer exchange school. There are two main tables – Students and Host Families. I am struggling to create a command that would connect any chosen student with possible suitable host families.
To determine, who is suitable, I created a table of 15 Yes/No questions, which are answered both by students and families. Now I would like to add a command button to the student form to create a query which would (1) search through all of the families and
their answers and (2) compare these with the ones the chosen student gave (e.g. the student whose form is open). In the end it should (3) list all the families according to number of matching answers and also (4) show where they don’t match.
Basically, I am completely lost here.
Any help would be much appreciated! Thank you in advance,
Vit

The reason this is harder than it needs to be is because you have violated important database design rules by creating what's called a Repeating Group.
Rather you should have a couple of tables:
Stock list of questions:
tblQuestions
QuestionID autonumber PK
QuestionText text(255) required uniqueindex
Answers given by students:
tblAnswers_Students
QuestionID long int required PK
StudentID long int required PK
Answer yesno required default=false
Similar for tblAnswers_GuestFamilies
Then put the tables on the Relationships diagram, draw the relations, and in the dialog that comes up check the box to enforce the relation.
Then see if you can figure it out with this correct database design.
-Tom. Microsoft Access MVP

Am I right with my supertype/subtype tables creation

hi there,
i have subtype/supertype relationship with a disjoint rule and
partial specialisation
---table supertype
create table gift(
gift_id number,
constraint pk_gift primary key (gift_id));
---table subtypes
create table stock(
gift_id number not null,
no_of_shares number,
curr_price number,
constraint pk_gift primary key (gift_id)),
constraint uk_gift unique (gift_id)delete cascade);
create table property(
gift_id number not null,
prop_address1 varchar2(5),
prop_address2 varchar2(15),
prop_address3 varchar2(20),
post_code varchar2(8)'
curr_prop_value number,
constraint pk_gift primary key (gift_id)),
constraint uk_gift unique (gift_id)delete cascade);
create table cash(
gift_id number not null,
amount number,
constraint pk_gift primary key (gift_id)),
constraint uk_gift unique (gift_id)delete cascade);
create table artwork(
gift_id number not null,
description varchar2(30),
artist varchar2(10),
curr_art_value number,
constraint pk_gift primary key (gift_id)),
constraint uk_gift unique (gift_id)delete cascade);
could you point out any mistakes in terms of unique constraints
and gift_id appearing as inherited by the subclasses from the
superclass. Notice gift_id is inherited by the sub classes as
primary key and not foreign key.
Are there other ways of doing this assuming i am wrong?
Much appreciation.
Ayo

Your unique constraints are unnecessary as primary key
constraints enforce uniqueness.
You should have foreign key contraints to indeicate that GIFT is
the master of the sub-type tables...
...having said which: what is the point of GIFT - it has no
attributes of its own so it is completely unnecessary.
The fact that th esub types have no key of their own also makes
me nervous. I would expect all subtypes to have a composite
primary key eg. GIFT_ID, STOCK_NO.
Furthermore, can a GIFT be both (say) STOCK and PROPERTY? If
not then you will need to enforce that exclusivity, which is
quite difficult to do. It's easier to do if you implement the
subtypes in one table, thus:
create table gift(
gift_id number,
GIFT_TYPE varchar2(5),
stk_no_of_shares number,
stk_curr_price number,
prop_address1 varchar2(5),
prop_address2 varchar2(15),
prop_address3 varchar2(20),
prop_post_code varchar2(8)'
prop_curr_value number,
cash_amount number,
art_description varchar2(30),
art_artist varchar2(10),
art_curr_value number,
constraint pk_gift primary key (gift_id));
You can then create a check constraint that ensures that only
columns relating to stock are filled when GIFT_TYPE = 'STK',
artwork when GIFT_TYPE = 'ART', etc. Note the use of prefixes
to make it easier to see which columns are for which type.
This will impose a slight overhead in terms of space usage, but
not as much as you think - empty varchar2 columns don't take up
any space and you're saving the overheads of multiple tables.
You could save additional space by amalgamating the value/amount
columns into a single gift_value column.
This implementation is not definitely better - these things
often depend on what you're going to do with the tables and
which business rules you need to enforce. If a gift can consist
of stocks and cash then you should go for the multi-table
approach otherwise go for a single table approach.
regards, APC

S_ALR_87012284 TABLES Stock

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for