Sales Order - Prevent user from creating more that one schedule line

Hello,
Is it possible to prevent users from adding lines (rows) in the schedule line tab of VA01/VA02 ? Our requirement is that one item will have one only schedule line, the quantity cannot be split into different dates.
Regards,
Joã

Hi
There are 2 schedule lines with different dates for a single line item in a sales order because of forward scheduling done by the system
System does backward scheduling first and if it fails then it does forward scheduling and that is why you find 2 different schedule lines
In configuration you can restrict the system to do only backward scheduling and stop after that
I am not infront of SAP now to tell you exactly where is the configuration available
I think it is  Logistics execution--delivery scheduling
But This config is definately available in standard system to avoid 2 or more schedule lines for a single line item in a sales order
But i am not able to understand what is the business logic for such a requirement because i feel it will create a lot of problems
with this requirement
Regards
Raja

Similar Messages

  • Hi All, We are in to Release 11.5.10.2.There is a specific requirement to Prevent users from creating Manual Sales Orders in oracle and yet users should be able to book the Sales Orders Imported from CRM system into Orcale.Please advise.

    Hi All, We are in to Release 11.5.10.2.There is a specific requirement to Prevent users from creating Manual Sales Orders in Oracle and  yet users should be able to book the Sales Orders Imported from CRM system into Orcale.Please advise.

    Thanks for your advise.
    However, I missed to mention that we have two set of users  One is for Finished Goods and another for Spares.
    Only Spares users need to be prevented from creating Direct/Manual Sales Orders in Oracle.
    As you suggested, if this will be done at Form level, that may Disallow FG users also to create Manula Sales Orders which should not be the case.
    Further, I tried to test one scenario through Processing Constraints but it did not work.
    Application
    OM
    Validation Type
    Entity
    Temp
    Short Name
    TBL
    Validation Semantics
    Created By
    Equal To
    User(Myself)
    Processing Cosntraint
    Application
    OM
    Entity
    Order Header
    Constraint
    Operation
    User Action
    Create
    Not Allowed
    Conditions
    Group
    Scope
    Validation Entity
    Record Set
    Validation Template
    101
    Any
    Order Header
    Order
    Above Created
    Please advise.

  • How to prevent users from creating new folders in share folder directory?

    Hello guys
    I'd like to know How to prevent users from creating new folders in share folder directory but still keep their power of creating new folders in their personal 'my folder'?
    I tried changing the 'manage privilage ---- create folder' to deny certain user accounts, but by doing so, it also stops the user from creating new folders in their 'my folder', which is not good..
    I also tried going into these share folders and tried different access types such as 'change/delete', 'read', 'traverse folder' etc, but none of it work ideally. The 'change/delete' access still allows them to create new folders, 'read' access prevents creating new folders but also take away their power of saving reports..
    Any thoughts on how to take away their ability to ONLY create new folders in share folder areas without affecting their other privileges?
    Please advise
    Thank you

    Easy, on the shared folders root folder only give them 'read' or 'traverse folder' but on the the folder inside the shared folders root folder give them 'change/delete'. That means they can change anything inside those folders but not create any folders at the shared folders root level.

  • How to prevent user from creating jobs

    Hi,
    we need to prevent user from creating jobs on a dev enviorement. It's a 10.2.0.4 database standard on linux 64bits.
    Their schema has only connect and resource roles. Is there a way to prevent them from creating jobs? In 11g it's the CREATE JOB permission, but in 10g i'm not sure how can i do this.
    Thanks for any ideas!

    On 10g it's probably the CREATE JOB as well.
    http://www.oracle.com/pls/db102/homepage
    Alternatively you could:
    alter system set job_queue_processes=0
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/initparams089.htm#REFRN10077

  • More than one schedule line when 'Only complete delibery allowed'

    Hi guys!!
    I need your help to solve a problem with the shipping of our sales orders. We have a customer which has been set with 'C' 'Only complete delibery allowed' in the field 'partial delibery per item', but if a sales order is blocked because credit limit has been exceeded and we try to release the order, the system automatically set several schedule lines in the schedule lines tab of the sales order. I know afterwards the system will not allow us to delibery the order unless we ship the whole line, but Is there any way to avoid the system set more than one schedule line?
    Thanks in advance for your answers

    Hi
    How many schedules are created. Normally if the system couldn't confirm the stock on the Requested Delivery date, then it will create one schedule line with zero quantity for that requested del date. Since it is a complete delivery, it should have only one more schedule line. If you have only two schedule lines, then it is working fine. If not, pl check the sales order whether that complete delivery is determined or not.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • How to prevent the User from loading more than one seq file?

    Hi,
    I would like to prevent the tester operator from loading more than one test sequence.  Any ideas how to do it?
    Thanks
    Rafi

    Hi Marty,
    Marty_H wrote:
    Hello mhousel,
    Testexec.exe by default loads the sequence files that were last open when it runs.  It is often desired behavior to have multiple sequence files load automatically. 
    [Mark Housel] Maybe for some but certainly not for me. 
    This should be easily handled by TestStand without any problems.  What do you mean by "chaos ensues"? 
    Certainly Teststand doesn't care a bit how many sequences are open.  But, when my sequences open they initialize HW of the ATE associated with
    that sequence file during the sequenceFileLoad callback.  e.g. I allocate TELNET handles to a terminal
    server that connects to multiple console within the system and als for
    the UUT.
    If a second sequence opens it knows nothing about the other sequence and again tries to open a TELENT session to the same port of the
    terminal server and obviously fails, so my sequence reports that it
    can't properly initialize the ATE HW.  Bad juju!
    Are your sequence files set to run automatically when they are loaded?
    I guess so.  Other than the trick of logging in as the special noExecution user and having special code in my sequence and modified Process Model I have no idea how to prevent a sequence fronm "runnin" when opened.
    If you want to prevent Testexec.exe from loading multiple files, you should be able to close out one of the open files when it loads and that sequence file should not load in the future.  I hope that helps.
    The trick I read somewhere else of modifying the Testexec.uir file to never re-load a sequence file automatically seemes to have covered up solved the problem.
    Thanks,
    Mark

  • How to prevent users from creating transactional problems?

    Dear Sirs...
    Using JDeveloper 10.1.2 and ADF UIX technology. If i created a web application that contains many pages. Assume the application contains pages A,B,C,D.
    The end user should access the pages A then B then C then D to get the transaction executed and commited correctly.
    the problem is:
    1- if a user navigates from A to B to C then he press the Back button to A then he commits the transaction, the data would be stored in correctly.
    2- if page C requires some preparations in page B (initalization of session variables) and the user enters page A then he changes the URL to C, then this would cause inproper execution of application and so the data would be stored incorrectly.
    so how can i prevent the user from pressing the back button of the browser (which i do not think is possible) or how can i prevent him from making any errors by inproper page navigation?
    thanks for any help in advance and best regards

    I really don't know if this is the correct way of doing it, but we prevent navigation directly to any page within our application if the HTTP Referer header is null. If it's null, we redirect to a page that says the user should use the navigation buttons provided and not enter the page via bookmarks, history, or direct navigation via a typed in URL.

  • Preventing users to create move in/out in special dates

    Hello,
    I need to prevent users from creating move out or move in, in special dates, for example: in the dates of schedule list of meter reading units.
    How can I do that? any Idea? I will appreciate any help.
    Thanks alot,
    Hussam.

    Hi,
    You can try to find out some user exit (SMOD, CMOD) for Move-In Process.
    EC500001 IS-U: move-in: determ. of security deposit amount and reason
    EC500002 IS-U: move-in: data environment check upon entry
    ECSBT001 User-Defined Messages in Information Log
    ECSBTI01 IS-U: move-in: determination of application form
    ECSBTI02 IS-U: move-in: determination of budget billing amount
    ECSBTI03 IS-U move-in: customer-defined checks
    ECSBTI04 IS-U: move-in: determination of transfer contract
    ECSBTIO1 Default value for field for move-in/out (EC60)
    ECSBTMR1 Preassign indicator for creating service notification/order
    ECSBTO01 IS-U: move-out: determine default values
    ECSBTO02 IS-U Move-Out: User-Defined Checks
    And there prepare your functionality.
    Vlado

  • Cannot prevent authenticated users from creating a blog on "My Page"

    I have a brand new Snow Leopard (10.6.1) 2.26 Ghz quad core Xserve with 12Gb RAM that will be used for web collaboration services. I've currently set up Wiki and Blog services with a group membership to allow creating wikis/blogs. The reason for this is for staff development purposes with the plan to add people into the group as they are trained. The process to set it all up was very simple, however, I'm having an issue preventing authenticated users from creating a personal blog. Although I can prevent the creation of wiki's to members of a group easily, any authenticated user on the server can log into "My Page" and will be able to create a blog. I've gone to server admin>choose the server>choose the "access" icon and set the column "for selected services below" (blog) to "allow only users and groups below" (the group) and it still doesn't prevent them from making a blog page. In WGM for the group on the "Basic" tab, the "enable the following services for this group" has only the choice of "none" and therefore since the site isn't showing as a choice, the Wiki, Blog, Calendar and Mailing List is grayed out. I've seen another thread that states in 10.6 that option for setting the service acl in the group settings of WGM is unavailable. Does anyone know a fix for my problem of security access for a "My Page" blog or is it a possible bug in Snow Leopard? Right now my only workaround is to remove the users access and enable it as they are trained. This isn't an ideal fix, however, because we have some users who want to limit their wiki or blog to authenticated users only, not public access. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
    Message was edited by: dstrollo.il

    Ran into this same issue.... Talked with a field engineer who confirmed the behavior. The question now is this a defect or "feature that does not work as as the audience desires". As I far can tell, the security setting for blogs in server admin does nothing at all. This has the potential to cause a few issues as you cannot limit who can have a blog.
    Message was edited by: jlindler

  • 10.6.1 Server - cannot prevent authenticated users from creating a blog

    I have a brand new Snow Leopard (10.6.1) 2.26 Ghz quad core Xserve with 12Gb RAM that will be used for web collaboration services. I've currently set up Wiki and Blog services with a group membership to allow creating wikis/blogs. The reason for this is for staff development purposes with the plan to add people into the group as they are trained. The process to set it all up was very simple, however, I'm having an issue preventing authenticated users from creating a personal blog. Although I can prevent the creation of wiki's to members of a group easily, any authenticated user on the server can log into "My Page" and will be able to create a blog. I've gone to server admin>choose the server>choose the "access" icon and set the column "for selected services below" (blog) to "allow only users and groups below" (the group) and it still doesn't prevent them from making a blog page. In WGM for the group on the "Basic" tab, the "enable the following services for this group" has only the choice of "none" and therefore since the site isn't showing as a choice, the Wiki, Blog, Calendar and Mailing List is grayed out. I've seen another thread that states in 10.6 that option for setting the service acl in the group settings of WGM is unavailable. Does anyone know a fix for my problem of security access for a "My Page" blog or is it a possible bug in Snow Leopard? Right now my only workaround is to remove the users access and enable it as they are trained. This isn't an ideal fix, however, because we have some users who want to limit their wiki or blog to authenticated users only, not public access. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

    Thanks for the suggestion, but that would prevent all users from creating personal blogs. I was hoping to be able to have a group of users that can create a personal blog outside of the blog attached to a wiki.

  • Is it possible to prevent a user from creating and approving a JV

    Hi,
    Is it possible to prevent a user from creating and approving a JV.  We have a rule that one user cannot do both.  What happens is user#1 creates the JV, then some other user#9 approves the JV.  Both user#1 and user#9 need to be able to create a JV and approve someone else's JV.
    The transactions in question are...
    F-02  General Posting - enter Journal Voucher (create & post)
    F-65  Enter General Document - Parking (create)
    FBV0  Post or Delete a Parked Document (approval)
    Please let me know the details.
    Thanks in advance,
    regrads,
    Chaks

    Hi,
    Requisition is submitted.....it means Requisition is saved or it means Requisition is Released..?
    Regards,
    manish

  • How to Create more than one Sales order

    Hi All
    Is it possible that at Va01 initial screen i have a field with name Group and when i select the group in that field sales order for alll the customer in that group may be created automatically
    Regards,
    Ammad

    Hi,
    Not clear about your requirement. Can you explain a bit? How are you going to determine which materials are doing to sell?
    Best regards,
    Anupa

  • Create Sales Order with Reference from Quotation

    Hi All,
    Is there any bapi or function to create sales order with reference from a quotation?
    I know BDC is possible but any other methods?
    Thanks
    Dyl

    You can use - BAPI_SALESDOCUMENT_COPY.
    Prerequisite is Copy control should exist in customizaiton.
    -Alpesh

  • To prevent user from droping his own object .

    Dear User
    I have a database user like "aaa" in oracle 7.3.4.0.1 database.i do not want user "aaa" to drop his own schema objects like table and any other objects that he is owner.Do i have any system privilege to stop this user from doing so.User should be able to create objects and modify object but not to drop his own objects.For this purpose i have created a database trigger at database level to stop user "aaa" for doing above action.this trigger is giving me error on creation in oracle 7.3.4.0.1 .But when i tried same trigger in oracle 8i and 9i it work well.In oracle 8i and 9i it is preventing user from droping his own objects but i get other errors also along with raised error in trigger which i want to stop .The error which i am raising in trigger is
    ORA-20001 INVALID COMMAND BUT OTHER TWO ERRORS THAT R RAISED AUTOMATICALLY ARE
    ORA-00604 ERROR OCCURED AT RECURSIVE SQL LEVEL 1
    AND
    ORA-06512 AT LINE 8
    I WANT TO STOP THESE TWO ERRORS .
    PLZ HELP ME IN THIS REGARD AS SOON AS POSSBILE .
    plz tell me is there any system privilege to stop user from droping his own object or any other way along with trigger at database level.
    Thank u.

    Hi
    DBAs can use PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE (in system schema) to disable certain SQL and SQL*Plus commands in the SQL*Plus environment on a per-user basis. SQL*Plus, not Oracle, enforces this security. DBAs can even restrict access to the GRANT, REVOKE, and SET ROLE commands in order to control users' ability to change their database privileges.
    The PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE table enables you to list roles which you do not want users to activate with an application. You can also explicitly disable use of various commands, such as SET ROLE. For example, you could create an entry in the PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE table to:
    read more about this at
    http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a90842/ch10.htm#1005648

  • Spare Sales order stealing stock from a Released production order

    Hi Gurus,
    This is not a new problem. I read the below link only a hundred time now.
    Sales order stealing components from Production order
    Business scenario-
    Top Assembly material - XYZ (Let's say Desktop PC), Proc type - E, Plng Strat - 40 (regular MTS scenario)
    Sub Assembly material - ABC (Let's say Monitor), Proc type - F, Plng Strat - blank. But we sell this part sometimes (Let's say - customer wants an additional monitor).
    Roy is a shop supervisor working on a $1 million Sales order for Top assembly XYZ which is already late and customer is screaming.
    He released the production order with no missing parts, printed and fretting to finish this order.
    After couple of hours of setup & machine prep - Roy went to pick up the parts and to his surprise material ABC is not available. 
    Tina is at shipping department working on a $1000 Sales order that arrive today. System said 'sure you can ship it 3 days in advance'. So created a delivery and shipped it to the customer.
    Now, Roy ran TCode: MB52 and found out that Tina just shipped his component ABC.
    SAP gave the part ABC to a $1000 sales order and business lost sales on a $1 million order.
    Please find the attachment for config screen shots TCode: OPJJ
    Sales order Checking rule
    Production order Release checking rule
    Please help me resolve this issue.
    Let me know if you need more info.
    Thanks,

    Praneeth,
    There are two separate concepts here.  "How do I ensure that production orders and Sales orders are on an equal footing" and "what is the purpose of 'check without RLT'.
    You have an ATP check relevant for Sales orders (checking rule "A" for Make To Stock).  You have an ATP check for production orders (I assume it is checking rule "PP").  If you want these two objects to have equal priority on stock and supplies, then make the two rules (OVZ9 for A and PP) identical.
    Now, to RLT.
    Prod Order Release has 'Check without RLT' active, that means - it'll let the sales orders (also that are outside the RLT) steal the stock.
    Sales orders that are outside RLT will automatically confirm.  "Stealing" stock is a result of combination of the ATP for the sales orders, plus the ATP for the sales order delivery, combined with the ATP for production orders. and any ATP you may have on Goods Issues against a production order.  I cannot possibly tell you what you should do to prevent stealing stock, since there are so many permutations of scenarios that can affect the outcome.
    I suggest instead that you give me concrete scenarios, telling me of specific problems, illustrated with screenshots of CO09, and I will help you through one or two specific scenarios.
    Best regards,
    DB49

Maybe you are looking for