Same javaFX jar, many applet instances in the same page

Hi all
I want to know if it is possible to embed a javaFX in a JSP/HTML page many times without instantiating many times the Java Console panel, for example, I have this code:
<script>
             function loadFX(){
                                loadLMCFX();
                    loadLMCCFX();
                function loadLMCFX(){
                    try{
                         var lmcFX = javafxString(
                                  archive: "https://extced.organization.com/LightFX.jar",
                                  draggable: true,
                                  width: 300,
                                  height: 320,
                                  code: "com.organization.business.main.MainLMC",
                                  name: "MainLMC",
                                  id: 'MainLMC'
                         document.getElementById('lmcFXDiv').innerHTML = lmcFX ;
                    } catch(err){}
               function loadLMCCFX(){
                    try{
                         var lmccFX = javafxString(
                                  archive: "https://extced.organization.com/LightFX.jar",
                                  draggable: true,
                                  width: 300,
                                  height: 320,
                                  code: "com.organization.business.main.MainLMCC",
                                  name: "MainLMCC",
                                  id: 'MainLMCC'
                         document.getElementById('lmccFXDiv').innerHTML = lmccFX ;
                    } catch(err){}
          </script>both applets are calling same jar, but different classes.
What happens is that if I put more than 3 applets in same JSP/HTML, I can see that sometimes 2 Java Console Panels are displayed. Sometimes one of the applets is not rendered. Sometimes it takes too much time to load one (or many) of the applets.
I want to know how to avoid these kind of problems, maybe I'm not using the right approach, but I want to know your expert opinion regarding this ;).
Any hint will be appreciated
Regards

If you get the same errors on different computer and with different computers then contact Apple : iOS: Restore errors 4005, 4013, and 4014 :
If you continue to see error 4005, 4013, or 4014 when you restore your device, contact Apple for support.

Similar Messages

Using the same correlation set to multiple instances of the same process

Hi all,
Assuming that I have a Purchase Order with multiple items and I have a BPEL process that is triggered for each item.
When the Purchase Order is cancelled by the customer, I want to cancel all BPEL process that is still running. I'm using SOA Suite 11.1.1.2.
My first attempt was to use an event handler associated to a cancellation operation, but I couldn't do this because when the second BPEL instance was started, a conflictingReceive BPEL Fault is triggered. This occurs because BPEL can't have more than one active receive/on message using the same correlation set.
Another way to do this is using a different correlation set for each instance (somethig like a composite key - Purchase Order ID + Item ID, i.e), but in this way I need to know all composite key in advance and send one message to each instance specifically.
Anyone have any suggestion of how to cancel more then one instance of the same BPEL process using Event or a generic way that does not need to send one message for each instance?
Events work very well to start more then one BPEL process but does not work well to receive an intermediate message during process execution because in this case we need correlation set to associate the event with the correct instance and BPEL does not support more then one instance of the same BPEL process waiting for the same correlation set.
Any suggestion will be very welcome.
Thanks in advance,
Rafael

Never mind. I got it.
I put the iisforward.dll and .ini is a seperate folder, and edited the iisproxy.ini's to include the portnumber like this. And I changed the hostheaders in IIS to Site1, Site2 etc
vhost1=Site1:80
Site1:80=C:\Sites\Site1\iisproxy.ini
vhost2=Site2:80
Site2:80=C:\Sites\Site2\iisproxy.ini
vhost3=Site3:80
Site3:80=C:\Sites\Site3\iisproxy.ini

Two localizations of the same Best Practice on one instance on the same client

Hi Gurus -
I have a situation where I need to install the Food & Beverage Best Practice for more than one localization on the same instance. This company has locations in more than one country and needs Best Practices for those countries. Is it possible, for example, to install Best Practice F&B for US and Best Practice F&B for Germany on the same client on the same instance? If so, how? Also is there any documentation on this?
Regards,
Jim McCollum

No one knows anything about this?

CNR: Two cnr instances in the same server (lab environment)

Hello, we are trying to install two cnr 7.2 intances on the same server in order to replicate in lab the real environnment (failover local cluster) without deploying two servers.
I've seen on the installation guide that installing both a local and regional server on a single machine is supported, but what about two local servers working as a failover pair?
up to date, we've managed to install both installs, the dhcp servers are configured for using different interfaces and web gui are listening in different ports. scp ports have been changed (1234 and 4321 ) and, on dhcp-server expert configuration: failover-remote-port and failover-port are configured to be different (677 - 678 in one , and 678 - 677 in the other)
We can manage both servers from DHCP - failover configuration, as they show up and running, and even see logs... The other configs are
When trying to syncronize we get the error
"ChangeSet list is empty."
is this configuration supported?
best regards!

user10127912 wrote:
Hi,
We are planning to install second instance of Oracle 11gR2 in Linux server 2.6.39-400.21.1.el6uek.x86_64 x86_64. This is something we never haven done before. If you have such experience, please give us some insight.
The existing instance has all the standard ports:
Connecting to (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=)(PORT=1521))
Enterprise Manager Console HTTP Port (pterpdb02) = 1158
Enterprise Manager Agent Port (pterpdb02) = 3938
What ports should we select for second listener and enterprise manager? Is there anything else that we need to know before we install the second instance?If you want a second database instance, no additional installation is required - as long as you want to run the second instance at the same version as the the first. Just fire up dbca and create the second database. One installation of Oracle (one ORACLE_HOME) is capable of supporting many database instances, though the same may or may not be said of the hardware it is running on.
As already said, one listener is enough. One listener, running from one oracle home, using the default name of LISTENER, running on the defualt port of 1521, is quite capable of -- indeed, WAS DESIGNED TO, supporte multiple database instances of multiple versions running from multiple ORACLE_HOMEs.
One instance of dbcontrol/dbconsole will support only one database. If you do not use Grid Control (extra installation, extra license) you will need to use the emca utility or one of the options in the dbca utility to configure a seperate instance of dbcontrol for each database. Don't worry about the ports, the creation utility will take care of it and report what it does.

Is database link only 'valid' for instances in the same server?

Background: We have 5 servers and installed Oracle 7.3 and 8.
Problem: I managed to create database link to other instance in same server; but not to other server. Error message received was :
ORA-02019: connection description for remote database not found
: TNS server name not found
BUT: I managed it with 'copy from ' command in SQL*plus.
Question: Is database link only 'valid' for instances in the same server?
Thanks! ;o)

user10127912 wrote:
Hi,
We are planning to install second instance of Oracle 11gR2 in Linux server 2.6.39-400.21.1.el6uek.x86_64 x86_64. This is something we never haven done before. If you have such experience, please give us some insight.
The existing instance has all the standard ports:
Connecting to (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=)(PORT=1521))
Enterprise Manager Console HTTP Port (pterpdb02) = 1158
Enterprise Manager Agent Port (pterpdb02) = 3938
What ports should we select for second listener and enterprise manager? Is there anything else that we need to know before we install the second instance?If you want a second database instance, no additional installation is required - as long as you want to run the second instance at the same version as the the first. Just fire up dbca and create the second database. One installation of Oracle (one ORACLE_HOME) is capable of supporting many database instances, though the same may or may not be said of the hardware it is running on.
As already said, one listener is enough. One listener, running from one oracle home, using the default name of LISTENER, running on the defualt port of 1521, is quite capable of -- indeed, WAS DESIGNED TO, supporte multiple database instances of multiple versions running from multiple ORACLE_HOMEs.
One instance of dbcontrol/dbconsole will support only one database. If you do not use Grid Control (extra installation, extra license) you will need to use the emca utility or one of the options in the dbca utility to configure a seperate instance of dbcontrol for each database. Don't worry about the ports, the creation utility will take care of it and report what it does.

Problem:Multiple instances of the same applet on a webpage...

I have an applet which connects to a server to read an XML-file.
I use Doucument to parse the XML-file like this:
String xmlurl="http://www.somesite.com/somexmlpage.php";
Document d =DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance().newDocumentBuilder().parse(xmlurl);
(...read the XML-file...)
This works fine.
However, I need multiple instances of the same applet running at the same time on the same webpage.
Now, with multiple applets running at the same time the parsing no loger works. If one applet is doing some parsing and a taskswitch takes place to let another applet run, the applet which is interrupted is not able to continue the parsing as it looses its "incoming data" when another applet reads from the server.
How can different applets affect each other like this?
And how can I fix the problem?
Thanks in advance for any help!!

However, I need multiple instances of the same applet running at the same time on the same webpage.
Why? But okay.Because the the different applets show information about different items.
Now, with multiple applets running at the same time the parsing no loger works. If one applet is doing some parsing and a
taskswitch takes place to let another applet run, the applet which is interrupted is not able to continue the
parsing as it looses its "incoming data" when another applet reads from the server.
How did you determine that's what's happening?By printing out debuginformation.
Each applet prints out a message (System.out.println) when it creates an instance of Document (ie. connects to the server) and the applet also prints out XML-information as the XML-file is processed.
But, actually, I was a bit quick in my first post; The applet doesen't neccesarily loose its "incoming data", but the parser looses the data it is parsing. I can download the data from the server first, and then start parsing it. If a taskswitch happens while one applet is parsing, it looses its data, even if the data is allready downloaded.
I see this since I see another applet making a printout, and when first applet starts again, the parser has lost track of its data.
It works fine if only one applet is running. And everything is fine until the next applets starts; I can see this from the printout.
Again, the appet prints out data as it parses the document. I see the next applet starting to work, and when the first one continues parsing again the printout shows that data is no longer there. It happens everytime the runtime switches to another applet, and it never happens if just one applet is running.
Googeling a little tells me that DocumentBuilder.parse() isn't thread-safe, but this shouldn't have anything to do with it, should it?
Each applet is a separate process, and not different threads in the same process, aren't they? (Not sure how the runtime treats multiple applets...)And secondly, the applets create their own instance of Document anyways.

How can I open multiple instances of the same version of FF?

I understand that if I have multiple profiles, I can run different versions of FF side-by-side (like 3.6 and 4).
However, what I'm interested in is how I can launch multiple instances of the same version of FF (4, for instance) using the same profile. In other words, I want to be able to double-click the desktop icon for FF, and open a new instance, and keep doing that as many times as I want. I don't want to have a different icon and profile for each instance (too much overhead to keep a dozen+ profiles in sync).
I can always launch one FF window instance, and then keep clicking ctrl+N to launch new instances from inside it, which they all share the same profile (as I want). So, basically, I want to be able to do that from my desktop icon, rather than by having to do it with the keyboard ctrl+N sequence.

But I don't understand why whatever Firefox does when you click ctrl+N can't also be done (with some sort of command-line switch) from a desktop icon?
In other words, I clearly can create many FF instances (even if they are the same FF.exe process) by doing ctrl+n a bunch of times. Why then can't this behavior be done from a desktop icon with some parameters?
As far as I know, FF is the only browser that doesn't directly allow multiple browser instances from desktop icons. IE, Chrome, Safari, Opera, etc... all let me launch a new instance (even if they are all single process and the instances are shared within the process).

Can I create a lot of instance with the same name?

I have, for a project in my studies, to create a map for an adventure game. I must create monsters on this map. For this I use a class that I called Creature. In my class Map i have to initialise the monsters but I
choose their quantity with Math.random() so I don't know how much the map will contain. If in a loop I do: Creature monster = new Creature(); will I have different instances with the same name(I doubt)? Will I have one monster re-created in each iteration of the loop? How can I do to have different monsters in different places (my map is a matrix 2x2)?

You would have many Creature references made, but only one variable to hold them, and it would go out of scope outside your loop. You could create a Creature array or use a List (both defined outside your loop) - as
// array
int numCreatures = randomGeneratedCreatureQuantity();
Creature[] monsters = new Creature[numCreatures];
for (int j = 0; j < numCreatures; j++) {
monsters[j] = new Creature();
// Or a list
int numCreatures = randomGeneratedCreatureQuantity();
ArrayList monsters = new ArrayList();
for (int j = 0; j < numCreatures; j++) {
monsters.add(new Creature());
}Good luck
Lee

Multiple instances of the same entity bean?

I am designing a J2EE application that is made up of a number of separate components that each have a well-defined responsibility. Each component is made up of one or more J2EE components (web clients and EJBs). I want to design the application such that it is easy in the future to deploy each component (or a group of components) on different servers. In order to do this I need to make sure that the interfaces between each component are exposed as remote interfaces (but I will use local interfaces inside each component). However, there are a number of entity beans that need to be accessed by more than one component. I am wondering how best to expose these entity beans. I believe there are a number of options:
1. Expose remote interfaces on each of the shared entity beans. The disadvantage of this approach is that it is inefficient and that I will not be able to take advantage of container managed relationships. (I am intending to use container managed persistence.)
2. Create a facade object (stateful session bean) for each of the entity beans which exposes a remote interface and in turn accesses the shared entity beans locally. The disadvantage of this approach is that I have to create some extra EJBs and that I cannot directly make use of container managed relationships etc from the client component.
3. I don't know if this is an option but I am wondering whether I can deploy a copy of each shared entity bean with each application component. The advantage of this approach is that the component would access the entity locally and could make use of container managed relationships. However, I don't know what the issues are with having more than one instance (per primary-key) of an entity in the same application. I don't know whether this would cause errors of whether they would get out of sync (because different instances with the same primary key would be updated by different clients). Initially each component would be deployed in the same server but later they would be deployed in different servers. In both cases with this option each component (JAR) would have copies of the shared entity bean classes.
Any suggestions as to the best approach and whether the last option is feasible would be much appreciated.
Thanks.

I think 2 beats 1. The main reason being to minimise the number of network calls. You're basically asking, are fascades a good idea? and the answer is yes.
You can obviously do 3 in different app servers. However you'll need to configure your app servers so they can handle the fact that they're not the only ones updating the database. This is to handle concurrency as you mentioned. How you do this will depend on your app server and will affect performance, but shouldn't be a problem.
I think you should definately decide up front what's going in different app servers, I dunno if 3 would work in the same app server.
Why do you would want to use multiple app servers?
Why not have everything in the same app?
Is is just the 1 database?
You can use clustering for scalability.

How to find out multiple instances of the same application

Hi,
Please help me with your Java Networking expertise.
Is there any way you could suggest where we could know how many instances of the same application is running in a network ?
Sending a UDP packet would require to specify the destination of the machine's IP address.
But when the same application is installed in two different machines, at run time both the instances should be able to communicate dynamically. Is there any way I can send a signal(packet) that should be picked up by the other application instance ? Both the machine are in the same network.
Thanks,
Deb

I guess there are many ways to do it. One simple way would be to broadcast a mesage whenever an instance starts up. Other running instances can then communicate back to it.

Deploy multiple instances of the same stateless session EJB

I have a stateless session bean.
The methods on the bean operate against DB tables.
Q: Can I deploy multiple instances of the same stateless session bean, but specify a different JNDI/datasource name in the deployment descriptor?
The method calls are all enclosed within a single invocation, just that I need to hit different databases (all with the same schema), and Id like to be able to lookup the EJB via a different JNDI name, and have the exact same functionality, just against different deployed datasources.
Does the spec allow/support this?
If not, any suggestions as to how to achieve this sort of functionality?
Im using JBoss 3.2.1 on Solaris, so Im not sure whether or not this is a JBoss "issue" or a limitation of the EJB Spec (or me being just plain wrong and trying to do something the "wrong way")
Nick

I have a stateless session bean.
The methods on the bean operate against DB tables.
Q: Can I deploy multiple instances of the same
stateless session bean, but specify a different
JNDI/datasource name in the deployment descriptor?
The method calls are all enclosed within a single
invocation, just that I need to hit different
databases (all with the same schema), and Id like to
be able to lookup the EJB via a different JNDI name,
and have the exact same functionality, just against
different deployed datasources.
Does the spec allow/support this?
If not, any suggestions as to how to achieve this sort
of functionality?
Im using JBoss 3.2.1 on Solaris, so Im not sure
whether or not this is a JBoss "issue" or a limitation
of the EJB Spec (or me being just plain wrong and
trying to do something the "wrong way")
NickI haven't done it but judging from the deployment descriptors yes.
For example if I have two bounded datasources java:/Database1 and java:/Database2
Lets say I have a session bean called MySession, then in your ejb-jar.xml you would have (notice that the desc, display, and ejb-name are the only differences)
<session>
<description>MySessionAlpha</description>
<display-name>MySessionAlpha</display-name>
<ejb-name>MySessionAlpha</ejb-name>
<home>com.mycorp.MySessionRemoteHome</home>
<remote>com.mycorp.MySessionRemote</remote>
<local-home>com.mycorp.MySessionLocalHome</local-home>
<local>com.mycorp.MySessionLocal</local>
<ejb-class>com.mycorp.MySessionFacadeBean</ejb-class>
<session-type>Stateless</session-type>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/DataSource</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
</session>
<session>
<description>MySessionBeta</description>
<display-name>MySessionBeta</display-name>
<ejb-name>MySessionBeta</ejb-name>
<home>com.mycorp.MySessionRemoteHome</home>
<remote>com.mycorp.MySessionRemote</remote>
<local-home>com.mycorp.MySessionLocalHome</local-home>
<local>com.mycorp.MySessionLocal</local>
<ejb-class>com.mycorp.MySessionFacadeBean</ejb-class>
<session-type>Stateless</session-type>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/DataSource</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
</session>
But now in the jboss.xml, we will have the following elements. What you may notice is that are bound to different remote and local jndi names. But the resource bindings are very different. The res-ref-name stays the same, but the jndi-name are different. I think this will work for you.
<session>
<ejb-name>MySessionAlpha</ejb-name> <jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionAlphaRemoteHome</jndi-name> <local-jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionAlphaLocalHome</local-jndi-name>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/datasource</res-ref-name>
<jndi-name>java:/Database1</jndi-name>
</resource-ref>
</session>
<session>
<ejb-name>MySessionBeta</ejb-name> <jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionBetaRemoteHome</jndi-name> <local-jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionBetaLocalHome</local-jndi-name>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/datasource</res-ref-name>
<jndi-name>java:/Database2</jndi-name>
</resource-ref>
</session>

Can you run multiple APEX listeners for different instances on the same server

Please confirm that we can run multiple APEX listeners for different instances on the same server? Is it an xml setup configuration or do we need to do more??
Thank You,
Tony Miller
SmartDog Services
Austin, TX

Yes.. Just exactly what I was looking for...
Thanks Jari!!
Thank You,
Tony Miller
SmartDog Services
Austin, TX

Multiple instances of the same entity bean out of sync

Env: NT4.0SP6/jdk build 1.3.1-b24/oc4j 1.0.2.2.1
Scenario:
A) Session Bean(SB) 1 loads Entity Bean (EB) 1.
B) Another Session Bean, SB2, loads the same EB1 (same pk).
(It turns out that oc4j loads 2 instances of the same EB1.)
C) SB1 changes data of EB1, and shows the data. All ok. The data
is there in database, shows up fine on the screen.
NOTE: the second instance of EB1 which is referenced by SB2 does
not receive any ejbLoad/... etc calls at this time.
D) Now SB2 tries to load the same EB with a different pk(EB2),
immediately causing oc4j to issue ejbStore to the 2nd instance
of EB1 (referenced by SB2), making it overwrite the changes made
by the EB1 referenced by SB1 (step C above).
I tried exclusive-write-access=false setting in orion-ejb-
jar.xml,
and it solved the above problem by making only one instance of
the EB with the same pk, and making sure ejbLoad/Store was
called around each biz. method.
However, I don't see any reason to turn off the exclusive-write-
access flag, as no one is writing into the database behind
oc4j's back.
Does anyone else see this behaviour (which looks like a major
bug as the container
must ensure that the instances of the same EB with same PK are
in sync)?
Thanks,
- nik.

yes, i have a similar problem with the 2.0.0 technology preview.
i added some kind of 'code' which demonstrates my problem at the
end of this message.
Description: It seems that different instances are not
synchronized correctly. I set a CMPfield and when I call getXY()
on this CMPfield from within a different instance of this ejb
(for example use a finder method to return a remote interface
for the same pk), then this getter of the CMP field returns an
old and wrong value.
bad bug, i guess.
suggestions?
Greetings from munich, /thomas
public TestBean
public abstract void setCMPField( int i );
public abstract int getCMPField();
void testMethod()
//set the cmpfield
setCMPField( 5 );
//call getXY() on 'this'
System.out.println( getCMPField
() ); //correct value 5 is returned
//now get a remote reference of 'this' and call getXY()
there
TestBeanRemote rem1 = ejbContext.getEJBObject();
System.out.println( rem.getCMPField
() ); //correct value 5 is returned
//now call a finder and call getXY() on the returned
remote
TestBeanRemote rem = ejbContext.getEJBHome
().findByPrimaryKey( ejbContext.getEJBObject().getPrimaryKey() );
System.out.println( rem.getCMPField
() ); //PROBLEM!! OLD VALUE RETUNRED!!!!!!

I'm a school tech coordinator. Many computers and many iPads. How many Apple IDs can I have per device, and how many devices can have the same Apple ID? To make my life easier, I'd like 200 devices to all use the same Apple ID.

I'm a school tech coordinator. I have many computers and many iPads. I apologize if there is a some place that has all the rules governing the use of Apple IDs. I looked, and I even tried to get the answers from multiple Apple rep's. I couldn't find the answers.
How many Apple IDs can I have per device?
I want to use the same computer to sync and backup many iOS devices. The iOS devices would be associated with different Apple IDs.
I may load apps under a school Apple ID and have users load their own apps under thier own ID.
How many devices can have the same Apple ID?
Can I use the same Apple ID on all the computers in a lab?
Can I use the same Apple ID on all iPads for a particular grade level?
Are the rules different for iOS devices and computers?
I know that there are limits on "authorize" and "de-authorize" and how frequently those things can be done.
Recently I heard that for the life of an iOS device, it can only be associated with five Apple IDs. That is not good for a school giving iPads to students in a 1:1
To make my life easier, I'd like 200 devices to all use the same Apple ID.

iTunes Store Support
http://www.apple.com/emea/support/itunes/contact.html
It would be best to address your questions there, especially since this is a public forum, and over there you could post more private issues with this set-up. Not to mention, getting more official answers.

Multiple application instance on the same server instance

Can we have multiple instances of the same application on a single WLS?? For ex, can I have two app.ear files in different application directories??

Hi Nilesh,
Can you please clarify your landscape as this will help in getting answers to your question.
In general adding instances (and/or server nodes) should be considered for increasing capacity rather than impoving performance. Specifcially, adding instances (and/or server nodes on the same host you risk a situation where the processes compete for resources which will have a negative effect on performance. If you do need to combine instances on the same host, make sure there is enough hardware (specifically memory in case of JAVA).
Hope this helps,
Best regards, Walter

Same javaFX jar, many applet instances in the same page

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for