SAP BSI Interface - Group Code

Hi Experts,
In the SAP BSI Interface, where is the Group Code (GC) coming from? I tried overriding this value from IT0234 but it doesn't seem to be accepting it. Its there in the Input table P0234, however, when I look at the Employee Data it is still taking the old Group Code into consideration and passing this on to the BSI Interface.
I need to change the Group Code so that the correct GC is passed in the BSI Interface from SAP.
Your help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks for your inputs!
So this is what I have so far --
I've maintained the Employee Groups in TaxFactory (correct Data Source and Data Set).
I see that in UMOT the Group Code is defaulted to "EG99".
I've maintained IT0234 for this employee with Empl.override group defined and Override percentage as 100%.
In the payroll log, under USTAX I see IT0234 (P0234) under Input, however, under Processing when I select "Employee Data" I still see the Group Code defined as EG99. This is then passed in the BSI interface as well.
For some reason its not taking the override defined in IT0234.
Am I missing something?
Thanks again for your help!

Similar Messages

Com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: java.lang.NullPointerException in sap pi

Hi all,
I am working on SAP PI 7.3.1 SP09. Currently we have interfaces which uses 50200 port. I have created a http destination from nwa pointing to https://....url. So all of a sudden all the interfaces went to error state. After debugging i found that the port 50200 is replaced with 50201which is https port. After changing the port to initial value ie., 50200 all interfaces are working fine except the one which were pointing to https url and they are showing the following error description.
<SAP:Error SOAP:mustUnderstand="1" xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapterFramework</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MESSAGE">GENERAL</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText>com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: java.lang.NullPointerException</SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:Stack />
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
The entire trace is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Sender scheme external =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Sender agency external =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Determining the sender agreement</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">##### DG: 3</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">##### TO: 3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine/?type=entry</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Request Line = POST /sap/xi/engine/?type=entry HTTP/1.0</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Host = 10.66.14.150:50200</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Server protocol = HTTP/1.0</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Remote address = 10.66.10.160</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">User = SFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Process ID: 760</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Work Process ID: 10</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message ID = 53BEFE7146893BD5E10000000A420AA0</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS">
<Trace level="1" type="T">CL_XMS_MAIN->DETERMINE_EXT_PID: CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">##### DG: 3</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">##### TO: 3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hop engine name = is.02.devpipd1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hop engine type = IS</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hop adapter name = XI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hop adapter namespace = http://sap.com/xi/XI/System</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="3" type="T">No triggers found. OK.</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">system-ID = PD1</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">client = 001</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">user = SFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2014-07-10T08:56:37Z INDIA</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">ACL Check is performed</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XML validation is executed</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = BE</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">>>>PID delete old pid determination coding</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline-Elements for pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0001 PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0002 PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0003 PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0004 PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0005 PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0006 PLSRV_OUTBOUND_BINDING</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0007 PLSRV_VIRUS_SCAN_RQ_OUT</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0008 PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_OUT</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0009 PLSRV_CALL_ADAPTER</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0010 PLSRV_VIRUS_SCAN_RS_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0011 PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RS_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0012 PLSRV_MAPPING_RESPONSE</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0013 PLSRV_VIRUS_SCAN_RS_OUT</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">0014 PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RS_OUT</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">system-ID = PD1</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">client = 001</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">user = SFUSER</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MESSAGE_PERS_MAN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST">
<Trace level="2" type="T">Persisting original message</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message-Version = 000</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="Timestamp">2014-07-10T08:56:37Z INDIA Begin of pipeline processing PLSRVID = CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB">
<Trace level="3" type="Timestamp">2014-07-10T08:56:37Z INDIA Start of pipeline service processing PLSRVID= PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Calling pipeline service: PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Reading Pipeline-Service specification...</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">PLSRVTYPE =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">ADRESSMOD = LOCAL</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">P_CLASS = CL_XMS_PLSRV_VALIDATION</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">P_IFNAME = IF_XMS_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">P_METHOD = ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_VALIDATION-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline Service = PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Skip Inbound Validation =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Skip Outbound Validation =</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Area = XML_VALIDATION_INB</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Reading sender agreement</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message does not contain a sender agreement</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Inbound validation by Integration Engine does not take place</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="Timestamp">2014-07-10T08:56:37Z INDIA End of pipeline service processing PLSRVID= PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB</Trace>
</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MESSAGE_PERS_MAN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message after plsrv call</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Message-Version = 001</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
<Trace level="3" type="Timestamp">2014-07-10T08:56:37Z INDIA Start of pipeline service processing PLSRVID= PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="3" type="T">Calling pipeline service: PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T

HI,
Thank you for your hint. Maybe I just forgot to mention one important fact. We have second SAP Netweaver PI 7.1 which is completely our system. The first one I mentioned in first message is the customer's one. The one we have extra is also connected to MAXIMO and GIS. Settings of this interface is completely same among one thing:
Patch level of XIAF:
1. customers SAP PI level is
Adapter Common Library Version: 1.7.1007.20081105173106.0000, NW07_07_REL (2008-11-07T17:29:47+0000)
Adapter Application Version: 1.7.1007.20081105173106.0000, NW07_07_REL (2008-11-07T17:30:00+0000)
2. our SAP PI level is
Adapter Common Library Version: 1.7.1008.20100215155230.0000, NW07_08_REL (2010-02-15T17:19:21+0000)
Adapter Application Version: 1.7.1008.20100215155230.0000, NW07_08_REL (2010-02-15T17:19:31+0000)
Both of them has Axis Version: Apache Axis version: 1.4 Built on Apr 22, 2006 (06:55:48 PDT)
Also important to mention is fact that same problem happened in our SAP PI, but we implemented last patch of XIAF and it has suddenly started to work. I have suspicion it is somehow connected to this patch. Btw. this patch contains a lot of notes regarding AXIS framework (i.e. 1435998, 1150375, 1048268), so obviously some bugs of the AXIS adapter has been resolved by this patch.
What do you think ?
Thanks

SOAP Sender Error - com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception

Hi,
I am testing a SOAP Sender Channel using a SOAP Client and getting the following error. I have read almost all the posts related to errors in SOAP Channel and also have checked my URL which is correct. AS mentioned in many of the posts, my url goes like
https://<host>:<port>/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?channel=:DEMO:SOAP_s_GETLIST&version=3.0&SenderService=DEMO&interface=si_os_GETLIST&interfaceNamespace=<namespace>
This is the error that I get when sending a message to the interface
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
   <SOAP:Body>
      <SOAP:Fault>
         <faultcode>SOAP:Server</faultcode>
         <faultstring>Server Error</faultstring>
         <detail>
            <s:SystemError xmlns:s="http://sap.com/xi/WebService/xi2.0">
               <context>XIAdapter</context>
               <code>ADAPTER.JAVA_EXCEPTION</code>
<text>com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: XIProxy:PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA:
     at com.sap.aii.adapter.soap.ejb.XISOAPAdapterBean.process(XISOAPAdapterBean.java:1041)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1044_10001.invoke(Unknown Source)*
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
            </s:SystemError>
         </detail>
      </SOAP:Fault>
   </SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
Has Anybody got this problem before? Is it any problem with the SOAP Adapter itself or with the data that is going in the message? If so, What is the possible solution for this?
Thanks,
Rashmi.

Hi Rashmi,
I also think your problem is data related.
Check the response in your SAP PI message monitor (SXMB_MONI) when you trigger a request using SoapUI. It sometimes provides a bit more detail. You design (data types, message types, service interfaces etc.) was done in SAP PI 7 then an Abap Proxy was generated from the service interface?
Sometimes there is an issue between the XSD data type declaration in SAP PI and the conversion to Abap data types that takes place when a proxy is generated from a PI Service Interface.
Check the data that you pass in your request, especially those like datetime fields. Maybe even change some of the data type definitions (like datetime) to a string (request & response) & then test through SoapUI & see if you still get the error. Then you can work out how to best resolve it.
Best Regards, Trevor

Com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.DuplicateMessageException

Hi All,
PI 7.1 is sending the following error:
2009-12-10 15:55:00     Information     Trying to put the message into the send queue.
2009-12-10 15:55:00     Error     Putting message into send queue failed, due to: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.DuplicateMessageException: Message Id ee6b5d0d-25a6-4aec-0fec-f1099b5335ce(OUTBOUND) already exists in duplicate check table: com.sap.sql.DuplicateKeyException: DB2 SQL error: SQLCODE: -803, SQLSTATE: 23505, SQLERRMC: 1;SAPPIDDB.BC_MSG_DUP_CHECK.
2009-12-10 15:55:00     Error     Returning to application. Exception: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.DuplicateMessageException: Message Id ee6b5d0d-25a6-4aec-0fec-f1099b5335ce(OUTBOUND) already exists in duplicate check table: com.sap.sql.DuplicateKeyException: DB2 SQL error: SQLCODE: -803, SQLSTATE: 23505, SQLERRMC: 1;SAPPIDDB.BC_MSG_DUP_CHECK
2009-12-10 15:55:00     Error     MP: exception caught with cause com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.DuplicateMessageException: Message Id ee6b5d0d-25a6-4aec-0fec-f1099b5335ce(OUTBOUND) already exists in duplicate check table: com.sap.sql.DuplicateKeyException: DB2 SQL error: SQLCODE: -803, SQLSTATE: 23505, SQLERRMC: 1;SAPPIDDB.BC_MSG_DUP_CHECK
I didn't find anything into OSS... =(   Does anybody can help me?
I really appreciate your help
Regards,
Gilberto Martínez

Hi Suman,
Which PI version you are using? Is it double stack?
We also faced a similar problem few days back.
We have tried a below approach and succeeded.
Can you please check with T-code SXMB_MONI if there are any queues are stopped (Red circle symbol written STOP on it).
Go to t-code SMQ1/SMQ2 and click on the line items, it will open another session which will display the details of message status (Green flag-scheduled).
Click on the Resend button on the tool bar, it will show a pop-up there click on Retain button.
This will help you to restart a stucked EOIO/EO messages.
P.S: You have to determine that how many such kind of queues are stopped and so you have to manually restart those scheduled messages.
Also refer to this thread Queue stopped in sxmb_moni
Try this if it helps.
Regards,
Dipen.

Account determination with valuation grouping code

We currently have 25 plants (valuation areas) setup using one chart of accounts and a common valuation grouping code for account determination. We now have a need to change one of the plants to use different accounts than the other 24 for the GBB transaction. I can see that transaction OMWD allows me to enter a different valuation group code by plant; so I've entered a different code for the plant we want to change. I then go into OBYC, double-click on GBB and I can see all the accounts set up. From here, if I press the 'rules' button I can see the options to base account determination on. Currently, the 'valuation modification' checkbox is unchecked - I believe this has to be checked in order to use the valuation grouping code.
I'm a little unclear on how to setup the different accounts for the valuation grouping code I've assigned to my one plant. When I checked the 'valuation modification' checkbox and save, I get a message 'the current account determination will be deleted if the rules are changed'. I've done this in a sandbox environment and it certainly does delete all the accounts setup for GBB! But it does then give me the option to enter the valuation grouping code, which is what I need to enter different accounts.
Am I doing this correctly and in the right sequence? Is there a way to save the current values in GBB so they don't go away when I choose 'valuation modification'?

Hi Leslie,
Based on your problem statement, if all the 25 plants are associated to a valuation grouping code, ideally your GBB key should have had the valuation modifier checked in the rules.
If it were not checked, then your current account determination for GBB key will get deleted when you add or delete a rule. Reason being the characteristics for account determination have now changes. Example, if you account determination is based on Valuation class as well, then earlier GBB had Valuation Classs/ Account but with the new rule it will have Valuation Mod./Valuation Class/ Account. SAP can't automatically map your previous account determination to the new account determination.
Best way to move forward is to take a screenshot or save your account determination from Table T030. Make changes to the rule. Then redo the account determination by refrecing the account determination that you saved before.
Regards

ISE and WLC dynamic interface group assignment ?

I have a somewhat large deployment coming up with several WLC dynamic interfaces assigned to an interface group, replicated across for multiple sites. I understand that ISE can return the VLAN ID to the WLC to place the client in, but if I'm using interface groups, this seems to negate the usefulness of the interface group to load clients across multiple VLANs. Not only that, but with the number of dynamic interfaces (VLAN ID's), multiplied by the number of sites, would seem to be overwhelming on the ISE side policy configuration.
Is it possible for ISE to return an Interface name/group to the WLC instead of just a VLAN ID ?
TIA

I understand that WLC 7.2 code can now accept the interface group name as a AAA override, which is great, but it doesn't specify the AAA source (ISE vs. ACS).
This is the example I'm questioning: (they use the VLAN ID only, instead of an interface name)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10315/products_tech_note09186a0080bba10d.shtml#topic17
Edit:
Found the correct Attribute Under "Adv. Attribute Settings" in the Airspace Authorization Profiles (Airespace:Airespace-Interface-Name).

How to update Material group code in contracts ?

Hi,
We implemented SAP in my company a year ago. AS you can imagine we need to do some cleaning now we know how it works...
We have change the Material Group code for over 1100 items.
Thing is, the material group code in the contracts do not update automatically.
I see two ways to handel this :
1- re-enter contract
2- delete lines that needs to be changed and recreate them...
I know for sure that both solutions would work but they are time consuming so I was wondering if one of you had another idea ( a quick or at least a massive one would be appreciated...)
Thanks for your help.

Hi,
You can use transaction MEMASSCONTRACT for mass changes to contracts
Caution:- Please use this transaction if you know, else first practice it in sandbox and then use in production environment
Thanks
Diwakar

DIF & KDR keys valuation grouping code wise

Hi Friends,
Is it possible to assign G/L accounts valuation grouping code wise for DIF & KDR account keys in OBYC
Regards
Rajesh A

Hi,
Unfortunately these transaction event keys don't have the option of switching on the valuation area group in the Rules settings.
SAP have, for some reason, decided that these should not be able to be configured to use different GL numbers per valuation area group (in your case company code).
I can only assume that there is some accounting logic behind this because they allow you to do it with other T event Keys?
The settings are bound to be controlled the event key tables and these really are best left alone unless you really HAVE to do this.
Sorry if this is not much help.
Steve B

Valuation grouping code account determination

We currently have 25 plants (valuation areas) setup using one chart of accounts and a common valuation grouping code for account determination. We now have a need to change one of the plants to use different accounts than the other 24 for the GBB transaction. I can see that transaction OMWD allows me to enter a different valuation group code by plant; so I've entered a different code for the plant we want to change. I then go into OBYC, double-click on GBB and I can see all the accounts set up. From here, if I press the 'rules' button I can see the options to base account determination on. Currently, the 'valuation modification' checkbox is unchecked - I believe this has to be checked in order to use the valuation grouping code.
I'm a little unclear on how to setup the different accounts for the valuation grouping code I've assigned to my one plant. When I checked the 'valuation modification' checkbox and save, I get a message 'the current account determination will be deleted if the rules are changed'. I've done this in a sandbox environment and it certainly does delete all the accounts setup for GBB! But it does then give me the option to enter the valuation grouping code, which is what I need to enter different accounts.
Am I doing this correctly and in the right sequence? Is there a way to save the current values in GBB so they don't go away when I choose 'valuation modification'?

Hi,
What your are doing is correct.
As you mentioned above if you want a different G/L for Plant they you have to change the valuation grouping code. As per Std.SAP when you change the rules in OBYC the existing G/L assignment will get deleted. Hence Please take a copy of the same before you carryout the changes in OBYC rules settings, so that you can maintain the correct G/Ls based on valuation grouping code as existed by checking the file which you have taken as a backup + the new Val.group code,val class & G/L assignment.
Thanks & Regards,

Valuation group code in acc determination ..?

Hi all
Can anybody explain ,
1.what is Valuation group code ..?
2.If we are having 3,4 company codes , how we have define valuation group code ..
Thanks
Sap-MM

If the automatic account determination within a chart of accounts is to run differently for certain plants (valuation areas), assign different valuation grouping codes to these valuation areas.
You must define the automatic account determination individually for every valuation grouping code within a chart of accounts. It applies to all valuation areas which are assigned to this valuation grouping code.
If the user enters a plant when entering a transaction, the system determines the valuation area and the valuation grouping code
Valuation grouping codes either reflect a fine distinction within a chart of accounts or they correspond to a chart of accounts
check the following link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/es/1d/1a39516e36d1118b3f0060b03ca329/frameset.htm
Regards
Pramod

Create valuation group code..?

Dear all
can anybody expalin me about the valuation group code.
1.How to craete the new valuation group code..?
2.What is use of valuation group code..?
Thanks
sap-mm

Hi mm,
I think there is No Functionality to create Valuation Grouping code. You can give your own grouping code.
Mian purpose of Valuation rouping code is to reduce the number of enteries of G/L a/cs and to group the similar/same accounts under one umbrella.
Make sure that Valuation grouping code is active , u can chk the same via SPRO>MM-> Valuation and Account Assignment>Account Determination->A/c Determination w/o wizard--->Define Valuation control.
Then u can group together valuation area under one Valuation group code, if they have the same G/L A/cs fro their postings.
For Eg. Check in OBYC Click on GBB Acct Key there Debit & Credit GL account will be same.
Reg,
Ashok
Assign points if useful.

Valuation class & valuation grouping code

Hi experts
What is the difference between Valuation class and valuation grouping code?

Hi,
u2022 Valuation grouping code of the valuation area
If the automatic account determination within a chart of accounts is to run differently for certain company codes or plants (valuation areas), assign different valuation grouping codes to these valuation areas.
You must define the automatic account determination individually for every valuation grouping code within a chart of accounts. It applies to all valuation areas which are assigned to this valuation grouping code.
If the user enters a company code or a plant when entering a transaction, the system determines the valuation area and the valuation grouping code.
u2022 Valuation class of material or (in case of split valuation) the valuation type
The valuation class allows you to define automatic account determination that is dependent on the material. for example: you post a goods receipt of a raw material to a different stock account than if the goods receipt were for trading goods, even though the user enters the same transaction for both materials.
You can achieve this by assigning different valuation classes to the materials and by assigning different G/L accounts to the posting transaction for every valuation class.
If you do not want to differentiate according to valuation classes you do not have to maintain a valuation class for a transaction.
For more details refer below link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/12/1a39516e36d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
Thanks!
Raju

Please help me how to check a material does existed group code in system (w

Hi all,
Please help me...
I have inputted quantity for tx MC 94 but when I input them into tx MC94, I met a message " Structure not yet maintained for this conbination characterstics". Step by step to show a error message as below:
Step 1: Launch MC 94
step 2: Enter Planning
Step 3: Enter Prod.Code. Material (ex: enter material code :0101010260008, this code is existed Prod.Code )
Step 4: Click on "Inactive Version " button
==> A error message is showed.
Please help me how to check a material does existed group code in system (which table to check it)?
How to record the message" Structure not yet maintained for this conbination characterstics" to catch up it in my program?
Thank in advance.

Karenloria,
1. Check in MC8C, which Infostructure is used for Planning type "Planning" or the one you are entering in the intial screen of MC94.
2. Using transaction MC63 for the infostructure identified in step 1, check the planning hierarchy maintained. If this product is not maintined maintain using MC62.
You can also check using SE16 transction the current infostructe records(Plan) for the table name = infostructure identified in step 1.
Regards,
Prasobh

Question on Interface Groups and Mobility

Hi everyone.
I have a small question.
I have two 5508 controllers with 6 Access Points (3 on each controller). The network layout has one AP on one controller, one on the other, 45 degrees and about 100ft apart from each other.
In this layout the clients roam from one AP to the other, one controller to the other, but there are certain times where the client loses connectivity to the network (layer 3). I don't see any disconnect or roaming messages in the controller logs, but the laptop shows a "!" sign in its wireless connection (win 7).
It can take from a few seconds to several minutes for it to get an ip address and connectivity again.
Now, for my setup:
I have 3 interfaces with different VLANs, and an interface group that binds those 3 interfaces together. The interfaces are called the same on both controllers, and the interface group as well.
The wlan number is the same, as the SSID configuration.
The question is:
When the client roams to the other controller, does it retain the same interface/VLAN configuration? I have found documentation stating that when the user roams and the WLC has the same subnet, it goes with no issues, but it doesn't mention interface groups. Could it be that in some handovers the client falls in a different VLAN even when it is in the same interface group?
Thanks in advance for your help.

Are these two WLC in same mobility group ? If that is the case clients should not change the IP when they roam from one WLC to another. Even in interface group configuration it should work like this.
Here is sample config I did to test this out (I haven't use interface group, but as per my understanding It should not make any difference).
http://mrncciew.com/2013/03/17/l3-inter-controller-roaming/
HTH
Rasika

Valuation grouping code in fi-mm integration

hi,
i have doubt in valuation grouping code, as for as my knowledge one type of raw material used by number of company codes (if same chart of accounts) for above all company codes used same raw material assaign to one variable (for ex "x" ) this variable assaign to one ' valuation class ' this valuation class assaign to one g/l account.
is it currect or not, any one have some clearity pl explain
with regards
raja sekhar.a

i close it

SAP BSI Interface - Group Code

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for