Scenario of stock analysis report

Hi,
Can anybody explain me about the stock analysis report in detail.
Thanks & Regards,
B.SREENIVASULU.

Hi Bysani,
Here is a list and if required more just let me know or any particular report .
Activities in Materials Management
Display Stock List
MB52
Display Stock in Transit Cc
MB5T
Display SLED/Date of Production
MB5M
Display Valuated Special Stock
MBBS
Display Stocks with Subcontractor
MBLB
Display Availability Overview
CO09
Display Stocks for Posting Date
MB5B
Display Material Items
MR51
Display Cancelled Material Documents
MBSM
Display Material Document for Reason for Movement
MBGR
Read/Display Material Document Archive
MBAL
Display Consignment Stocks
MB54
Display Customer Consignment Stock and Returnable Packaging with Customer
MB58
Stock Overview
MMBE
List of Material Documents
MB51
Display Stock/Requirement Situation
MD04
Display GR/IR List of Balances
MB5S
Analyze Conversion Differences
MB5U
List of Stock Values: Balance Display
MB5L
Stock Consistency Check
MB5K
Manage Held Data
MBPM
Reservation Management Program
MBVR
there are many more if you go to the Environment , reporting ,list displays node in the SAP standard menu under Materials management , you will find this node (Environment , reporting , list display) under lot many sub nodes .
regards
kp

Similar Messages

Standard stock analysis report

Hi Experts,
As per client requirement, needed stock analysis report based on following formula, Ratio of
Stock at the end of month
Avarage quantity issued per month during year
if ratio is 5 to 10 then it slow moving material
if ratio is 10 to 15 then it very slow moving material
if ratio is 15 to remaining then it non moving material
which standard reports will help in finding exact solution, please don't suggetst for Z-reports as needs to be done with standard's only.
Thanks in advance...

Dear,
Have a look below as found...
Formula
Inventory Turnover = Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) / Average Inventory at value.
If you are not familiar with the term Cost of Goods Sold, this is the cost of your revenues.
Average Inventory is measured in value and not in volume.
If you divide both elements you know how often you sold youu2019re average inventory. u201CSo what?u201D you ask. I will explain next.
Concept and use
I will present you with two business scenariou2019s to point out the significance of the Inventory Turnover ratio.
Scenario 1
You sell one product. You invest 10.000 EUR as starting stock. You run your business for one year and at then end of the year you are completely sold out. Your revenue accumulates to 12.500 EUR. For simplicity sake your gross profit is 2.500 EUR (12.500 - 10.000).
Revenue = 12.500
COGS = 10.000
Average Inventory = 5.000 (10.000 starting stock + 0 end stock / 2 = 5.000 average stock)
Inventory Turnover = 2
ROI = 50% > 2.500 (R-C) earned out of 5.000 (A)
Scenario 2
Again you sell one product. But this time you invest 5.000 EUR in starting stock. After 6 months you sold your stock and you replenish your stock again for 5.000 EUR. After another 6 months youu2019re sold out. Your revenue is again 12.500 EUR. Your gross profit is 2.500 EUR (12.500 - 5000 - 5000).
Revenue = 12.500
COGS = 10.000
Average Inventory = 2.500 (5.000 starting stock + 0 end stock / 2 = 2.500 average stock)
Inventory Turnover = 4
ROI = 100% > 2.500 (R-C) earned out of 2.500 (A)
Conclusion
Looking at the two scenarios the increased inventory turnover means increased operating efficiency: your ROI increased from 50% to 100%! Obviously you invested half the money in scenario 2 to achieve the same profits.
This doesnu2019t mean businesses should try to achieve a maximum inventory turnover per se. Achievable ratios differ per material type (finished goods, semi or raw), but also per moving speed (ABC class). Last but not least the type of industry very much determines what ratio you can achieve: process industries typically have higher inventory turns than, say, heavy equipment manufacturers.
You can find out what the industry standards are by purchasing metrics from data suppliers like Reuters or Gartner. This will give you an idea how well you are doing compared to your competitors. Or you can just use inventory turnover as an internal benchmark. In this case you periodically review the inventory turnover for different sets of materials and set targets that you wish to achieve.
Inventory turnover is typically a financial measurement (see relation to ROI). In order to improve the ratio, close cooperation with procurement/production planning is required, since they directly influence the stock levels.
Again, as with many KPIs and reports donu2019t judge based on this value alone, but use other stock controlling reports to minimize your inventory and still have a sound service level.
Finally you can read an interesting business case on how inventory turns made Dell a leader in itu2019s business.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.
Have a look at: http://www.kowboyz.nl/blog/mc44-inventory-turnover/
Edited by: Syed Hussain on Jul 10, 2009 12:16 PM
Edited by: Syed Hussain on Jul 10, 2009 12:18 PM

Stock analysis report

Hi all,
I want to create Stock analysis report in BW3.5 can anybody tell me is there any standard data source for stock analysis or any standard cube in bw if yes then please help me out.
thankes

Hi Ankit,
First insatall the business content objects:
0IC_C03,corresponding update rules from the info sources, Infos source 2LIS_03_BX,BF,UM.
Then load the data from BX Extractor first then load the data from BF and UM data sources
For futher informatins go through the PDF document how to inventory management!
Hope this might help you
Regards
Ram

Stock Aging Analysis Report by Serial Number

Hi Experts,
Is it right to create a Stock Analysis Report for all materials based on Serial Numbers? Because I have now developed a Stock Aging Report which will display the values of stock aging based on Goods Receipt created however, when I base it on Goods Receipt and Serial Numbers, the number won't tally. Please explain what happened? Is this approach not feasible?
Please help.
Thanks a lot for your answers!

Hi @Bijoy,
We are now experiencing a lot of issues regarding tracking the stock by serial numbers because the current stock aging report only applies to a FIFO stock system. There are also stocks that are transferred from Location to another Location (Sto Loc to Sto Loc2) and they wanted their stocks' aged to be based on the first Storage Location Posted. Please tell me if this is feasible.
Thanks a Lot!

Report for monthly/ weekly stock analysis

Hi,
Could anybody please let me know the transaction code for the following.
-> I would like to call a report for stock analysis (quantity basis not stock value), What I want is to call up figures of monthly / weekly usage over 6 months.
Thanks in advance

Hi ,
Pls try MC45.
Enter only one object to analyse either : plant/ pur org/sales org
Input your period to analyse
Report shows consumed materials with stock value and qty ..Click double line & triple line tabs to get more details.
thnks
nandu

Stock Analysis : Dead Stock : More than 60 Days.- Report

Dear SAPians
Good Evening
I need a SAP report i want to know if there is a SAP standard report i dontr want to have a Z-Report. My requirement is
Stock Analysis : Dead Stock : More than 60 Days.Required Fields are
Item code Description S.Loc Qty Value.
Pls ssuggest me .
Thank You
with regards
Moosa Anis
+91 9922 577 477 / +91 99608 47444

MC50 or MB5M use for dead stock

Sales and Purchase Analysis reports by Item

The current functionality of these reports is more like an open items list rather than an analysis report.
If you Run a Purchase Analysis report by Item with a secondary selection of Supplier, and choose GRPO - the scenario is to find out how many of which products you have received in the date range from a specific supplier. This type on data is useful to use for negotiations on pricing etc.
Currently, the report will only display values for GRPO that have not been drawn to AP Invoice. This is supposedly system functionality, but, the report is called analysis, so should provide data for that purpose?

Hi,
You may double click the column header to change the sort.
Thanks,
Gordon

Zero Quantity in Purchase Analysis Report

I have create Item AP invoice on today date, raise AP credit note for that full AP invoice on today date. Then run purchase analysis report. (Quantity column will show zero) How can I get rid of these zero quantities.

hi,
Check in the Inventory tab of item master data for those items. What is the value for in stock and available.
If you have done a/p credit memo for those items then by default the system will show zero quantity as the system considers it as the items which are returned
Hope its helpful
Regards
Darshan Desai

Stock Transfer Report after Invoice

Hello Experts
Please spend one minute's time to read this. It may be long but its the exact scenario.
I have got a requirement to generate a Stock Transfer Report for the bills passed (invoice receipt) for a particular date range. Note that the delivery against the PO can be for partial quantities too.
I am using RBKP table to get all the invoice numbers falling in the certain date range selection. Against these Invoices I am retrieving the PO number and other report relevant data from the RSEG Table. And using the PO I need to get into the MSEG table to retrieve Mat Doc numbers so that I can drill into the excise tables to get Excise No.
Now the problem is:
Suppose the PO 4900000337 contains various items
item no | material | qty
10 | mat1 | 1050
20 | mat2 | 2670
30 | mat3 | 450
Now one partial delivery is made as
item no | material | qty
10 | mat1 | 100
20 | mat2 | 250
mat doc 4900012713, mov type 641
and the against this delivery an invoice receipt is created using MIRO, 5105600790
another partial delivery is made as
item no | material | qty
20 | mat1 | 350
30 | mat2 | 50
mat doc 4900012714, mov type 641
against this delivery an invoice receipt is created using MIRO, 5105600791
How do I link the invoice no to the material documents to know the quantity of the particular item of the PO... as we see item no 20 is common in both the case.
RSEG
Document Number Fiscal Year Item Purchasing Doc. Item
5105600790 2007 000007 4900000337 00020
5105600791 2007 000007 4900000337 00020
MSEG
Material Doc. Mat. Doc. Year Item Line ID Parent ID Movement Type Material Quantity Purchase Order Item
4900012713 2007 0004 000005 000002 641 90050106 250.000 4900000337 00020
4900012714 2007 0002 000003 000001 641 90050106 350.000 4900000337 00020

Hi...
1) MIRO is done against Purchase Order right??
> Yes, MIRO is done against PO. And, when I try to do it against Deliv. Doc. its not possible as its not displaying any items!
2) In BSEG : you put the PO number 4900000343 then the below rows are visible right??
>Yes.
3) Can you please paste the rows : BELNR, EBELN and VBELN only ??
Here they are...(with some other fields which might be of importance)
For PO 4900000343
Table: BSEG
Document Number Transaction Assignment Billing Doc. Plant Quantity Purchasing Doc. Item
BELNR KTOSL ZUONR VBELN WERKS MENGE EBELN EBELP
0490021088 BSX 20071024 0010004216 2006 50.000 4900000343 00010
0490021088 BSX 20071024 0010004216 6201 50.000 4900000343 00010
0490021088 AUM 0006201001 0010004216 6201 50.000 4900000343 00010
0490021088 FR1 490000034300010 0010004216 6201 50.000 4900000343 00010
0490021088 BSX 20071024 0010004216 2006 100.000 4900000343 00020
0490021088 BSX 20071024 0010004216 6201 100.000 4900000343 00020
0490021088 AUM 0006201001 0010004216 6201 100.000 4900000343 00020
0490021088 FR1 490000034300020 0010004216 6201 100.000 4900000343 00020
0490021089 BSX 20071024 0010004217 2006 200.000 4900000343 00020
0490021089 BSX 20071024 0010004217 6201 200.000 4900000343 00020
0490021089 AUM 0006201001 0010004217 6201 200.000 4900000343 00020
0490021089 FR1 490000034300020 0010004217 6201 200.000 4900000343 00020
0490021089 AUM 0006201001 0010004217 6201 100.000 4900000343 00030
0490021089 FR1 490000034300030 0010004217 6201 100.000 4900000343 00030
0510000678 FR1 490000034300010 6201 50.000 4900000343 00010
0510000678 FR1 490000034300020 6201 100.000 4900000343 00020
0510000679 FR1 490000034300020 6201 200.000 4900000343 00020
0510000679 FR1 490000034300030 6201 100.000 4900000343 00030
Can you also show the rows for the PO that you have mentioned in your first message.
PO 4900000337
Table: BSEG
Document Number Transaction Assignment Billing Doc. Plant Quantity Purchasing Doc. Item
BELNR KTOSL ZUONR VBELN WERKS MENGE EBELN EBELP
0490021080 AUM 0006201001 0010004205 6201 350.000 4900000337 00070
0490021080 FR1 490000033700070 0010004205 6201 350.000 4900000337 00070
0490021080 BSX 20071017 0010004205 2006 50.000 4900000337 00100
0490021080 BSX 20071017 0010004205 6201 50.000 4900000337 00100
0490021080 AUM 0006201001 0010004205 6201 50.000 4900000337 00100
0490021080 FR1 490000033700100 0010004205 6201 50.000 4900000337 00100
0490021081 BSX 20071017 0010004206 2006 500.000 4900000337 00010
0490021081 BSX 20071017 0010004206 6201 500.000 4900000337 00010
0490021081 AUM 20071017 0010004206 6201 500.000 4900000337 00010
0490021081 FR1 490000033700010 0010004206 6201 500.000 4900000337 00010
0490021081 BSX 20071017 0010004206 2006 300.000 4900000337 00020
0490021081 AUM 0006201001 0010004206 6201 300.000 4900000337 00020
0490021081 FR1 490000033700020 0010004206 6201 300.000 4900000337 00020
0490021082 BSX 20071017 0010004207 2006 300.000 4900000337 00010
0490021082 BSX 20071017 0010004207 6201 300.000 4900000337 00010
0490021082 AUM 20071017 0010004207 6201 300.000 4900000337 00010
0490021082 FR1 490000033700010 0010004207 6201 300.000 4900000337 00010
0490021082 BSX 20071017 0010004207 2006 250.000 4900000337 00020
0490021082 AUM 0006201001 0010004207 6201 250.000 4900000337 00020
0490021082 FR1 490000033700020 0010004207 6201 250.000 4900000337 00020
0490021101 BSX 20071025 0010004229 2006 1,000.000 4900000337 00010
0490021101 BSX 20071025 0010004229 6201 1,000.000 4900000337 00010
0490021101 AUM 20071025 0010004229 6201 1,000.000 4900000337 00010
0490021101 FR1 490000033700010 0010004229 6201 1,000.000 4900000337 00010
0490021101 BSX 20071025 0010004229 2006 250.000 4900000337 00020
0490021101 AUM 0006201001 0010004229 6201 250.000 4900000337 00020
0490021101 FR1 490000033700020 0010004229 6201 250.000 4900000337 00020
0510000675 FR1 490000033700030 6201 400.000 4900000337 00030
0510000675 FR1 490000033700070 6201 250.000 4900000337 00070
0510000675 FR1 490000033700090 6201 50.000 4900000337 00090
0510000676 FR1 490000033700070 6201 350.000 4900000337 00070
0510000676 FR1 490000033700100 6201 50.000 4900000337 00100
0510000677 FR1 490000033700010 6201 800.000 4900000337 00010
0510000677 FR1 490000033700020 6201 550.000 4900000337 00020
Thanks. I have added you on GoogleTalk... if you use it, we can discuss there and update the thread...
Regards
Aabhas K Vishnoi

Data Ownership in Sales Analysis Report

The company has sales employees around the world and the company is not interested that each of them
can see the others sales, so when an employee runs a sales analysis report they should only see
their own documents but it not happened despite the data ownership funtion was activated and all the
options related with the sales analysis excluded forms was filtered by header only.
According to SAP Support team their comments were:
"We have reproduced the issue in our testing database. After verification, we noted that this is the current system definition as described in the attached Data_Ownership2004_A.pdf file. In page 11, it mentions that Data Ownership Authorizations apply to sales and purchasing documents, the Open Items List, Sales Opportunities and Sales Opportunities Reports. This is why the header filtration does n ot work in Sales Analysis Report.
As the requirement is currently not available in the standard software version of SAP Business One, we would like to ask you post your requirement in our SAP Business One Product Development Collabora tion forum."
Due to the current situation and the disconfort that this can produce, I will appreciate a lot your help.
Thanks in adavance,
Manuel Barrero

Hi Vassilis,
Sorry, but in my opinion it's correct.
We also use Drop Ship and like you said in the Stock Posting List we don't have any document and it's perfect. In other way when we sell an item we want and it's true the quantity that B1 is showing.
We want to see the for a itemcode we sold 100qty qith the value of 1000.
There's no way to avoid this SAP B1 behaviour.
Kind regards,
Augusto

Query to mimic the items tab of the Sales Analysis report.

Hi there,
I'm currently looking to create a query that mimics the behaviour of the Sales Analysis report in B1. The items tab of the Sales Analysis report provides all the data I require - the only issue is that I would like to merge this data with some other data regarding current on hand stock quantities etc. and therefore I would like to be able to pull out the query behind the Sales Analysis report.
I'm assuming this cannot be done and therefore I'm attempting to build a query to replicate the results. The query needs to show Item No, Item Description, Quantity Sold, Sales Amt (in system currency), Gross Profit and Gross Profit % for items within a given period.
If this can be done relatively easily, can the query then be modified to show all items (including items that haven't sold in the date range) merely with '0' for Quantity Sold, Sales Amt etc. if the item hasn't been sold in the period, and the appropriate figures if each of these columns if the item has sold. I assume some kind of CASE statement can be used to generate this.
So the query needs to show Item No, Item Description, Current quantity in stock, Quantity Sold, Sales Amt (in system currency), Gross Profit and Gross Profit % for all items within a given date range.
I hope you can assist me with this problem.
Thanks
Grant.

Hi,
Thanks Gordon that was exactly what I needed.
I've been trying to add some additional columns to the query but I'm experiencing some errors and I can't quite tell why.
Basically, here's the code from another working query I have which I wish to merge into the query you've suggested above:
SELECT T0.[ItemCode],
T0.[ItemName],
T3.[ItmsGrpNam],
T4.[Name] AS [Sub-Category],
T5.[Name] AS [Sub-Sub-Category],
T0.[CardCode] AS [Pref Supplier],
T6.[FirmName] AS [Brand],
T0.[U_Range],
T0.[OnHand],
CASE WHEN T0.[StockValue] = 0 THEN 0 ELSE T0.[StockValue] END AS [StockValue],
T1.[Price] AS [PBK GBP Price],
CASE WHEN T0.[OnHand] = 0 THEN T0.[LastPurPrc] ELSE T0.[StockValue]/T0.[OnHand] END AS [Ave Cost],
CASE WHEN T0.[OnHand] = 0 THEN T1.[Price]-T0.[LastPurPrc] ELSE CASE WHEN T0.[OnHand] > 0 THEN T1.[Price]-T0.[StockValue]/T0.[OnHand] END END AS [Margin],
CASE WHEN T0.[OnHand] = 0 AND T0.[LastPurPrc] = 0 THEN 0 ELSE CASE WHEN T0.[OnHand] > 0 AND (T0.[StockValue]/T0.[OnHand]) = 0 THEN 0 ELSE CASE WHEN T0.[OnHand] = 0 THEN (T1.[Price]-T0.[LastPurPrc])/T1.[Price]*100 ELSE CASE WHEN T0.[OnHand] > 0 THEN (T1.[Price]-T0.[StockValue]/T0.[OnHand])/T1.[Price]*100 END END END END AS [Margin %],
T0.[LastPurPrc]
FROM [dbo].[OITM] T0 INNER JOIN [dbo].[ITM1] T1 ON T0.ItemCode = T1.ItemCode INNER JOIN [dbo].[OITB] T3 ON T0.ItmsGrpCod = T3.ItmsGrpCod LEFT OUTER JOIN [dbo].[@U_SUBCATEGORY] T4 ON T0.U_Subcategory = T4.Code LEFT OUTER JOIN [dbo].[@U_SUBSUBCATEGORY] T5 ON T0.U_SubSubCategory = T5.Code INNER JOIN OMRC T6 ON T0.FirmCode = T6.FirmCode
WHERE T0.[OnHand] >= 0 and T0.U_Range not in ('E','X')
ORDER BY T0.[ItemCode]
Essentially I just wish to add the fields which are specified in the query above, but not in the query you've already suggested:
SELECT T0.ItemCode,
Max(T0.ItemName),
Max(IsNull(T0.OnHand,0)) 'In Stock',
SUM(IsNull(T1.Quantity,0)) 'Quantity',
Sum(IsNull(T1.LineTotal,0)) 'Sales Amt',
SUM(IsNull(T1.GrssProfit,0)) 'Gross Profit',
Case WHEN Sum(Isnull(T1.LineTotal,0)) = 0 THEN 0 ELSE
SUM(IsNUll(T1.GrssProfit,0))/Sum(Isnull(T1.LineTotal,0)) * 100 END 'Gross Profit %'
FROM dbo.OITM T0
LEFT JOIN dbo.INV1 T1 ON T1.ItemCode=T0.ItemCode
LEFT JOIN dbo.OINV T2 ON T2.DocEntry=T1.DocEntry AND T2.DocDate Between [%0] AND [%1]
GROUP BY T0.ItemCode
I was hoping it would be fairly straight forward but so far I've had limited success.
What am I missing here?
Thanks in advance!

AP Credit Memo and Good return, creates differences between TB and Stock Audit Report

Hello Experts,
Did any one has ever faced an issue, whereby AP Credit Memo and Good Return creates discrepancy between journal entry and the stock audit report?
Here is the scenario:
AP Credit Memo
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Total
Item A
                30
            3,400
   102,000
Journal Entry :
Debit
Business Partner
     105,000
        Credit
                      Stock
     105,000
Inventory Audit Report
Description
Quantity
Cost
Transaction Amount
Item A
                        30
                     3,500
                                                105,000
Journal Entry :
Debit
Business Partner
     105,000
        Credit
                      Stock
        105,000
The difference is actually due to the moving average, but the strange part is why the difference is not posted in the journal entry, in the Price different account?
This makes the stock account amount to be different from the Trial Balance and the Stock Audit Report.
And this is applied also on the Good Return transaction.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Best Regards
Cedric Kayitare

Hi Cedric,
Price & Item cost are different.
while making goods return , Direct AP Credit Note, Sales Delivery, Direct AR Invoice, stock is going outside.
In these transactions Journal entry will happen for Item cost and not Item sales or Purchase price.
Please enable item cost field in line level and check whether above formulae is matching with Item, cost field.
Then what is the importance of price in these documents??
Price is the agreed selling or purchase price for trading with Customer and supplier.
In your example
You are returning back material worth 105000(as per moving average price), but supplier is supposed to give only you 102,000.
Hope you understand
Thanks
Unnikrishnan

How to build a Analysis report in OBIEE 11g

Hi All,
I have a query regarding 'How to' to build an analysis report in OBIEE 11g.
The data model is a financial data model, where information such as Actual, Plan, Forecast, What - if etc for current AND prior year need to be displayed in a dashboard.
I created two analysis reports one for current year Rep1 and second for prior year Rep2 each with filter criteria as current year and prior year respectively based on years column. and then in the dashboard I created prompt based on scenario column (radio button) for Actual, plan, Forecast, and wht if.
I am able to show the current vs prior year data in the same dashboard for Actual or Plan or forecast or what if (depending on data availability in the database).
I want to achieve the same information in a single analysis report instead of two separate analysis reports. I do not want to create separate physical report for current and prior year data.
I need one analysis report which I can use in dashboard and depending on selection for scenario (actual , plan, forecast or wht if) I want to show the current AND prior year data the way I achieved in with two seperate reports embedded in their respective sections as explained above.
Does any one have idea how to achive this by building single analysis report?
If you need any more clarificaiton or have any queries, please let me know.
Thanks and Regards
Santosh

As per I understand your requirement,
In your Dashboard create a Presentation variable which receives the value of year you select.
Now in your analysis, select the year column along with all the measures you want (Actual, plan, Forecast, and what-if, etc).
Create a filter on Year column and convert it into SQL. Put the condition as:
"Year" BETWEEN @{Presentaion_Variable} - 1 AND @{Presentation_Variable}
You will get the result for selected year and the previous year.
Hope it helps..
Regards,
A.K.

Calculationg current and past year for a Analysis report in obiee 11.5

Dear All,
Need some help here.
I am a beginner in OBIEE and need some help to build a report in obiee 11.5 as described below;
I need to create a PnL report such that I show current years profit and loss AND prior year profit and loss figures in a report side by side for comparitive analysis for user.
My data is an essbase database, and have a years dimension with values 'current year' , 'F08', and 'Prior Year'. and other measurs such as revenue, % revenue, gross profit, cost of sales, operating expenses etc. (I am using 107 from oracle downloads) for obiee 11.5
There is another dimesion called time period with members as Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4, and each having respective months (e.g. Jan, Feb, Mar for Q1 etc)
I also have a scenario dimension with members as Actual, plan, Forecast, Wht -if..
Now I need to create a this report.
I created this report based on approch no 1 below;
Appraoch 1
- Create two analysis reports with all the above columns.
- specify filter for year column equal to current year for first report
- specify filter for year column equal to prior year for second report
- create a dashboard with a promt (radio button) based on column scenario
- create two sections placed side by side below the promt and place above two reports in those two sections so that they appear side by side
Nw when I run this dashboard, it works fine, and shows me the current and prior data for actual, plan etc...
BUT....
I need to create the same reports using a single analysis report instead of two separate reports with hardcoded values for year filter.
Now I tried use AGO funtions on but , it requires a column with numerical value so that it can calculate the past year, but in my case year is a column hving text value and hence i cant use it.
I would like to know how to build such a report using any other variable or function or any rpd level modifitions.
If I had a year dimesion with numeric values, then how would I use to calculate the past year once u select current year .?
Let say values are 2012, 2011, 2010 etc. so If I select 2012 as current year, I should get data for 2012, and 2011, if I select 2011, then I should get data for 2011 ,and 2010.
Please help me to build logic either at analysis level or at repository level
Thanks and Regards
Santosh

Hi,
As per I understand your requirement,
In Pivot table, place 'Year' in pivot columns instead of rows.
Create an SQL filter on Year and put the condition as:
*"Year" BETWEEN @{Presentation_Variable} - 1 AND @{Presentation_Variable}*
You will get the result for selected year and the previous year.
Hope it helps..
Regards,
A.K.

Age Analysis report

Hello Experts !!!!
My Client requires a Stock Age analysis report .
It is a trading company of steel .
my client wants to know that how old my stock is in warehouse or how much is 30 days old ,60 days old ,90 days old.
Below is my query
SELECT T0.ITEMCODE , T0.DSCRIPTION,T2.U_WT,SUM(T0.QUANTITY)AS QUANTITY,T1.DOCDATE,
CASE WHEN Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<30 THEN SUM(T0.QUANTITY) END '<30 Days(Qty)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<30 THEN SUM(T0.QUANTITY)*T2.U_WT END '<30 Days(MT)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>30 AND Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<60 THEN SUM(T0.QUANTITY) END '<60 Days(Qty)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>30 AND Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<60 THEN SUM(T0.QUANTITY)*T2.U_WT END '<60 Days(MT)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>60 AND Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<90 THEN SUM(T0.QUANTITY) END '<90 Days(Qty)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>60 AND Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<90 THEN SUM(T0.QUANTITY)*T2.U_WT END '<90 Days(MT)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>90 AND Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<120 THEN SUM(T0.QUANTITY) END '<120 Days(Qty)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>90 AND Datediff(day, T1.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<120 THEN SUM(T0.QUANTITY) END '<120 Days(MT)'
FROM PDN1 T0 INNER JOIN OPDN T1 ON T0.DOCENTRY =T1.DOCENTRY INNER JOIN OITM T2 ON T0.ITEMCODE=T2.ITEMCODE
GROUP BY T0.ITEMCODE , T0.DSCRIPTION,T1.DOCDATE,T2.U_WT
but problem is that i am able to track when goods were arrived in warehouse .But i am enable to track how much went out warehouse.
" MY CLIENT WANTS THE REPORT GOODS RECEIPT NOTE WISE REPORT. " that how much qty has been delivered against a particular Goods receipt note. But we havn't provided any reference to delivery of goods receipt note .
Experts Thanx in advance.
Krishna Vamsi

Hello Krishna Vamsi,
Try this:
SELECT T1.ITEMCODE,T1.ItemName,T1.U_WT,SUM(IsNull(T0.INQty,0)-IsNull(T0.OutQty,0)) AS QUANTITY,T0.DOCDATE,
CASE WHEN Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<30 THEN SUM(IsNull(T0.INQty,0)-IsNull(T0.OutQty,0)) END '<30 Days(Qty)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<30 THEN SUM(IsNull(T0.INQty,0)-IsNull(T0.OutQty,0))*T1.U_WT END '<30 Days(MT)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>30 AND Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<60 THEN SUM(IsNull(T0.INQty,0)-IsNull(T0.OutQty,0)) END '<60 Days(Qty)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>30 AND Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<60 THEN SUM(IsNull(T0.INQty,0)-IsNull(T0.OutQty,0))*T1.U_WT END '<60 Days(MT)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>60 AND Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<90 THEN SUM(IsNull(T0.INQty,0)-IsNull(T0.OutQty,0)) END '<90 Days(Qty)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>60 AND Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<90 THEN SUM(IsNull(T0.INQty,0)-IsNull(T0.OutQty,0))*T1.U_WT END '<90 Days(MT)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>90 AND Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<120 THEN SUM(IsNull(T0.INQty,0)-IsNull(T0.OutQty,0)) END '<120 Days(Qty)',
CASE WHEN Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())>90 AND Datediff(dd, T0.DOCDATE,GETDATE())<120 THEN SUM(IsNull(T0.INQty,0)-IsNull(T0.OutQty,0)) END '<120 Days(MT)'
FROM dbo.OINM T0
INNER JOIN dbo.OITM T1 ON T0.ITEMCODE=T1.ITEMCODE
GROUP BY T1.ITEMCODE,T1.ItemName,T0.DOCDATE,T1.U_WT
Thanks,
Gordon

Scenario of stock analysis report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for