Scenario with Contract, PO and GRN

Hi experts,
I have a scenario where I'm buying a stock item with different quality. In material master, I'm maintaining it as split valuation.
I'll be buying the stock item based on a quantity contract. In the process, I will create PO with reference to the contract and perform GRN when I receive the goods.
The goods will come in a bundle with all the qualities mixed up. There will be a manual process of separating the goods based on the quality due to different quality will have different price. In that case, I will only know the total price of that purchase after the segregation. I will then perform GRN based on the respective quantity and price into different valuation.
For example,
Contract quantity 100 PCS
GRN (One material code with split valuation)
Quality A 25 PCS USD20 per piece
Quality B 25 PCS USD15 per piece
Quality C 50 PCS USD10 per piece
I will only know the PCS after the segregation process. By then only I can enter the PCS during GRN based on a pre-determined fixed price.
How shall I approach this scenario? Any idea or suggestions are welcome.
Thanks & regards,
JT

Hi there
There is a option,,
You can receive into GR blocked stock (103), there will not be any acc documents, only the Matl doc will create, after the screening you can transfer(Release from blocked stock to Unrestricted use stock) all through 105 into diff Valuation,,
But check with Business, as most of the times business will not be happy to receive the stock as non valuated and get into own later, since it will have one more step.
it is my siggestion for this scenario...
Thanks
Senthil

Similar Messages

Mapping scenario with one customer and many invoices

Hi!
I am receiving a flat file with one customer and n-invoice records. The file could look like this:
133133222051241480320842420500089
13317350071000010806372131000                 0015890009876543X
13317350071000010806372131000                 0015890009876543X
13317350071000010806372131013                 0015890009876443X
13317350071000010806372131014                 0015890009872343X
where the first line is customer and the rest are invoices.
My question is: How can I get this into a structure like this:
<Customer>
<...>
<Invoice>
<...>
<Invoice>
<...>
When using content conversion (Customer,1,Invoice,*) there has to be specified a key field, which is not a possibility. Do I have to create a UDF for this to get the mapping I want?
Thanks for your answers!
regs Ole Mugaas

Thanks for your answers!
As I can see from the Krawcyk blog, he is only using one node and maybe that's why he don't have to use keyField. We have also come to the conclusion that we have to use keyfield, but then we have to give the fields out own values. This is not good enough since the values are predefined. Creating a "placeholder" in each data type would not be a good answer because then our customers have to send an additional field in the file which would cause a lot of work.
Do you know how this can be solved with the keyfield? Is it possible to create a keyField and give it a value that is already there, ex:
Invoice.keyFieldValue = Invoicenumber (where Invoicenumber is a field specified in the DT) ?
regards Ole

Very Urgent (Unique user Id scenario with Oracle LDAP and SSO)

Unique user Id scenario.
Our oracle LDAP repository is setup for customers to login from different companies. We have a requirement to integrate Oracle LDAP users with Oracle 9iAS portal 3.0.9 Single Sign On. I have two userid with same name on the LDAP from different company. For example userid jsmith from company A and jsmith from company B. Both userid do not exist on Portal Login Server. However, both userids will be created automatically in Login server when LDAP and Portal synchronize user list.
1. How oracle portal will handle such scenario when portal requires unique userid?
2. Can I customize portal login screen? For example when they login they can provide userid, passwd and domain name. Where domain name could be company name.
Let me know if you need more information. Feel free to send direct e-mail also.

Unique user Id scenario.
Our oracle LDAP repository is setup for customers to login from different companies. We have a requirement to integrate Oracle LDAP users with Oracle 9iAS portal 3.0.9 Single Sign On. I have two userid with same name on the LDAP from different company. For example userid jsmith from company A and jsmith from company B. Both userid do not exist on Portal Login Server. However, both userids will be created automatically in Login server when LDAP and Portal synchronize user list.
1. How oracle portal will handle such scenario when portal requires unique userid?
2. Can I customize portal login screen? For example when they login they can provide userid, passwd and domain name. Where domain name could be company name.
Let me know if you need more information. Feel free to send direct e-mail also. The scenario you describe is one addressed by Oracle9iAS Portal Release 2's capability to support multi-company hosting. In that scenario, each company has a separate branch of users represented in the directory information tree, as you describe. In this case, both users may have cn=jsmith, but the rest of the DN provides the distinguishing domain, e.g., cn=jsmith,dc=oracle,dc=com and cn=jsmith,dc=microsoft,dc=com.
Version 3.0.9 also supported multi-company hosting, but it was only an internally used feature and one leveraged by a few early adopters. http://portal.oracle.com is one of our hosted examples of multi-company hosting on 3.0.9.
In 'hosting' mode, the login screen displays a third entry field, as you describe, allowing the company name to be specified.
For a supportable configuration, you should use Oracle9iAS Release 2 if you want to employ hosting mode. However, if you need some solution in 3.0.9, you can probably achieve something acceptable by making a slight modification to ssoxoid.pkb. I'm not entirely sure about this, because I'd have to dig into the code (which should be unwrapped, for customization such as this), but you could have users enter their names like 'jsmith@oracle' or 'jsmith@microsoft'. Then, within the ssoxldap.pkb authenticate_user function, you'd need to have the company name added to the base search base before doing the search. Then, once authenticated, the SSO server and Portal would create shadow entries which are unique 'jsmith@oracle', 'jsmith@microsoft'.
Like I say, I'm not sure if the structure of the ssoxldap.pkb file will entirely support this, but that's your best bet until you get Release 2. There will be a 'Multi-Company Hosting Cookbook' provided with Release 2 that will provide the necessary supplemental information to activate hosting mode. You should understand that setting up hosting mode takes a bit more administration than the default single company mode.
If your portal has already been running a while without the @company names then there will also be the issue of getting all the accounts already created moved over to the @company names.

JDBC Scenario with JDBC Lookup and Updates

Dear Experts,
I am working on a JDBC receiver scenario.
In this scenario, we are also using JDBC lookup to check the maximum EntyNumber which is a primary key. We are manually incrementing this primary key by one and inserting the record into the database.
Both JDBC lookup and JDBC Insert are two differnt tasks. Thus when we send multiple IDOC's concurrently JDBC lookup fetches old values and when we try to insert the record if gives error of PRIMARY KEY VIOLATION.
For example, consider the below scenario,
Assume that there are already 10 records in the database.
1. Two IDOCs No 1 and 2 sent from SAP system at the same time.
2. Now, during the mapping of 1st IDOC we did a lookup and found that latest entry number in the database table is 10 and we mapped the entry number to 11 ( 10+1, i.e. next record )
3. Before updating this record in the database, second IDOC triggered. During JDBC lookup of the sceond IDOC, we got the same entry as the earlier record has yet to be updated.
4. During JDBC call we get the SQL error that "Primary Key Violation" because both the records have same primary key as "11".
Kindly share your ideas.
(SAP system is not sending the IDOC's in any certain order and we need a solution in PI itself. )
- Shri

>>> I am actually sending the primary key value to more than one table as a foreign key. I am looking for some solution
If you are passing primary key value to many tables then jdbc lookup would not be solution. Use stored procedure.
Refer this link for data type creation for stored procedure
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2e/96fd3f2d14e869e10000000a155106/content.htm

WebDispatcher Scenario with MI25 SP18 and Abap Servlet

We use MI25 client in an Internet Scenario.
We use the webdispatcher to hide from the internet the real "truehostname:53500" of the middleware Web As 640.
In this way the end user syncronize their MI25 devices pointing the webdispatcher at "anotherhostame:80".
The Webdisp recive these call from the internet and forward them to the "truehostname:53500".
To do that it uses the ms/http_port= 8134 parameter into the into the profile.cfg.
THat in case of J2EE Servlet.
NOw we have to switch from J2EE Servlet to Abap Servlet, as the J2EE servlet will be dismitted soon, and because using the Setup Package it uses the Abap Servlet.
We need to know wich port have to be inserted in ms/http_port in order to the WebDispatcher to route to the 8035 port.
35 is the middleware system number
8035 is the port of the Abap Servlet where the MI25 should point in order to syncronize.
Any advise ?

HI Mauro,
I'm not sure what exactly you ned to know?
The ABAP Sync is embedded in the standard ABAP HTTP Service. (transaction SICF). When you now select in the Menu GOTO->Port Information you will get the info on which port the ABAP Sync runs on the WebAS. Now direct your Webdispatcher to this port.
When using the webdispatcher also check out the following note 974840.
It describes how to add webdispatcher info to your mobile components in order to be able to deploy them to devices out in the field (as the MCs are deployed via Http Download the download link needs also to be changed to the Webdispatcher).
If you have further Question let us know...
Rgds Thomas

File Scenario with Dynamice Filename and Directory

Hi All,
we have a requirement that PI has to pickup the file from 2 FTP Server.
First PI has to pickup an XML file from Server1 , this XML file has a details about the Filename and Directory of the second FTP server., then PI should login to the server2 and pickup the file form the directory.
Regards,
Mani

Hi Mani,
Can you try below approach ,
Read file 1 from Server 1 using sender file Communication channel and read 2nd filename and directory details and pass these values to UDF/Java mapping to log in to server 2 and retrieve the data/file2 ?
Thanks
Hari.

Project Server 2010 SP2 - Use with IE11, Firefox and Safari

More groups in my company are being onboarded to start reporting time and managing projects out of Project Server /PWA 2010.  We found that one of the groups have MACs and use either Safari or Firefox. There are some members of that
same team who are using an HP machine but are using IE 11.
From what I am reading and what I am seeing it appears that with Firefox and Safari you cannot access Manage Timesheets or Project Center.  Has anyone found a work-around for this?
The work-around we are using for IE11 is to add Project Serrver to the Compatability View.  Does anyone know of a problem with this approach?
Thank you

Look into using the 'IE tab' for Chrome/Firefox as a work-around. I had a similar scenario with Mac users and installed IE tab in their Chrome/Firefox browsers for them and worked pretty good for the most part. Hope this helps.

IDOC to FILE scenario With Screen shots

CAN YOU PLEASE SEND US THE DETAILS OF IDOC to FILE scenario With Screen shots and do the needful for me

Hi Surya,
I thought i will just share a few basic thoughts that you need to take care while doing an IDOC to File Scenario. Just see if it helps you in anyways.
While doing an IDOC -> XI -> File scenario, The Points to noted are:
1. You dont need a DT, MT or a message interface for the IDOC as it itself acts as the Message Interface.
2. You import the IDOC and use the same in your mapping.
3. In this configuration note that you dont have a sender agreement as you dont have a sender IDOC adapter.
If it is that you wanted to send an IDOC from XI (File to IDOC) , then in this case:
points 1 and 2 will remain, but the 3 will not. You will need a sender agreement for the file and a receiver agreement for the IDOC.
IDOC -> File scenario ref:
<a href="/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters scenario</a>
File -> IDOC ref:
<a href="/people/anish.abraham2/blog/2005/12/22/file-to-multiple-idocs-xslt-mapping to IDOC</a>
To be able to trigger your IDOC from the SAP ISU system, you will have to set the partner profile in we20. Select your Business System (mostly under Logical system) and then create Outbound entries for whichever IDOC you want to trigger.
You define your basic type also in your partner profile settings, Please go thru the following links to get a better idea about partner profile:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/dc/6b833243d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/dc/6b7cd343d711d1893e0000e8323c4f/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/32/692037b1f10709e10000009b38f839/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/5e/b8f8bf356dc84096e4fedc2cd71426/frameset.htm
Also, I would suggest that you go through this blog by michal if any issue arises,
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/xi-error--unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions
Also have a look at these forum threads...
IDOC TO FILE SCENARIO
idoc to file scenario
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Abhy Thomas

FILE TO IDOC SCENARIO WITH SCREEN SHOTS

can u please send me FILE TO IDOC SCENARIO WITH SCREEN SHOTS and do the needful for me

/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/03/03/creating-purchase-order-idoc-through-xi
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/xi-error--unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions
Also have a look at these forum threads...
IDOC TO FILE SCENARIO
idoc to file scenario
I hope this answers your query.
regards
Sreeram.G.Reddy
Message was edited by:
Sreeram Reddy

Business scenario..for ISU and integration with R/3 modules..

Scenario:
1.     Client is providing Utility services to the customer and also to its own employees.
The service is also consumed by the employees who are treated as contract partners in ISU. The constraint is that the utility bill has to be deducted from their payroll, which is deducted monthly using a wage type from their pay roll, which is in SAP R/3.
2.     Similarly some of the contract partners are also vendors to the client (the vendor and contract partner is same). The consumption of utility bill is adjusted to the payment made by the client to vendor.
Questions :
1.     How we can deduct the utility bill of the employees from their payroll. Is there any integration of ISU with HR ?
2.               Also how can we clear the receivables in FICA since data can be pushed from FICA to FICO thru reconciliation keys but not vice versa ?
3.     How can the utility bill be deducted from vendors account and there is no standard link between vendor master to contract partner in ISU.
     Can anybody suggest any standard solution for these two scenarios or any work arounds .
Early solutions are highly appriciated
Thanks and Regards

Hello,
Please look into my answers below:
Questions:
1.     How we can deduct the utility bill of the employees from their payroll. Is there any integration of ISU with HR?
i.     There is no integration between ISU with HR. What you need to do is that create separate account determination id <say HR> and use this id in Contract account to identify that a particular contract account is an employee related ID.
ii.     Now at the end of the day or month collect the O/s balances of all the employee contracts in a form of flat file, use a BDC program to update the data in the HR table PA0014 <Please confirm with your HR colleague too> so that their pay would be = Actual payroll-Amount due.
iii.     After the above step, make sure that you run FPY1 <Payment run program> to clear all employee open items. You can have a separate payment method for Employees and attach the same in contract account
iv.     You can create a separate Z table to map Employee ID with a contract number so that during creation of flat file in step 1.ii above, your job becomes easier.
2. Also how can we clear the receivables in FICA since data can be pushed from FICA to FICO thru reconciliation keys but not vice versa?
i.     Please refer to point 1.iv above. You need to run FPY1 Payment run to clear employee receivables in FICA.
3. How can the utility bill be deducted from vendors account and there is no standard link between vendor master to contract partner in ISU.
i.     There is no integration between ISU with AP. What you need to do is that create separate account determination id <say AP> and use this id in Contract account to identify that a particular contract account is a Vendor related ID.
ii.     Now at the end of the day or month collect the O/s balances of all the vendors in a form of flat file, use a BDC program to update the data in the AP table BSIK so that amount to be collected from vendor = Actual amount-Amount due.
iii.     After the above step, make sure that you run FPY1 <Payment run program> to clear all Vendor open items. You can have a separate payment method for Vendor-Contract Accounts and attach the same in contract account
iv.     You can create a separate Z table to map Vendor number with a contract number so that during creation of flat file in step 1.ii above, your job becomes easier.
Additional points to be considered
1.     Check if at all separate clearing rules are needed for Employee- Contract accounts, Vendor-Contract Accounts & other contract accounts.
2.     Verify FM COMPUTE_CONTRACT ACCOUNT_BALANCES is useful in obtaining the balances of contract accounts <I do not have SAP ISU active system with me else I would have provided correct FM>
3.     There may be performance issues based on the volumes of the data.
Rgds
Rajendra

Clariffications in MM SUS Scenario with ECC 6.0 backend and SRM 5.0

Dear Team,
We are implementing MM SUS Scenario with ECC 6.0 backend and SRM 5.0
We need to following clarifications
1 Once we create ASN in SUS, how to cancel the ASN. We are not able to see cancel button for ASNs
2 When we create GRN in ECC against the inbound delivery and perform Return Delivery, this Return Delivery is getting updated in SUS. But the ASN status is not changing to canceled. We are not able to perform new ASN for this. Also invoice is being allowed for these ASNs. How to control the same.
Request your inputs please
Regards,
Ravi

HI can you tell me how you get it solve?
thanks in advance.

How to create a contract with one supplier and two dealers?

Hi Gurus,
I have a contract with a supplier (eg. Apple), but the products and services are supplied by two dealers.
The supplier is the manufacturer and with whom the negotiation of prices is made.
The dealers are those who make the delivery of the products and services and who the payment is done.
How can I create a contract with these characteristics in SRM 7.0?
I don't want to create two contracts with same products and services for two suppliers (Dealer_1 and Dealer_2).
How can this be handled through business partner type "Vendor"?
In "Partner" section in "Header" --> "Basic data", I can only add 1 vendor.
The system is:
Component software: SRM_SERVER
Release: 700
Level: 0008
Support package: SAPKIBKV08
Thanks in advance and best regards,
Alonso Valenzuela

Hi Wadim,
I have a similar requirement to create order lines in an existing contract with reference using BAPI_CUSTOMERCONTRACT_CHANGE. The order lines get created in the contract. However, the condition types from the order line which i'm referencing are not getting referenced and are not getting added in the Contract's line after referencing.
Did you come across any such issue ? If yes , could you suggest the solution ?
Regards,
Venkat.

I have an iphone 5 on contract with 3 but the speaker isn't working , I've spoken with my provider and they said I need to take it back to an apple store .is this correct ? Many thanks

I have an iphone 5 on contract with 3 but the speaker isn't working , I've spoken with my provider and they said I need to take it back to an apple store .is this correct ? Many thanks

If you received you phone as part of the contract then surely from a legal pov your contract is with 3 not Apple unless you bought Applecare, if you bought your phone outright then put your 3 SIM into it then yes you'd have to visit an Apple store with your phone's purchase receipt.

ALE/IDOC and RFC/BAPI Integration Scenarios with SAP DS for ESA v3

Hi,
we are planning two PoCs of Integration Plattforms. One of our major requirement set is SAP Integration into our existing SOA.
Because we also have R/3 4.7 Systems in production, we are planning to test ALE/IDOC and RFC/BAPI Integration scenarios with these Integration Plattforms.
My question is:
We are looking for are smart solution to get a SAP Test Environment, where we can test ALE/IDOC und RFC/BAPI Integration scenarios.
It is possible to do this with SAP DS for ESA v3 or shall we better use IDES for that purpose?
Best regards,
Steven

Hi Abhishek,
This is our scenario. We are doing an integration of SAP HR r/3 system with the CRM system. We need housing information details of the employees which we have in custom infotype 9310 in SAP HR system and we need those details in the CRM system. So am planning out for an ALE/IDOC approach for the integration and gonna maintain the 9310 details in a custom table. In the CRM system, we gonna build a BOL layer for accessing the 9310 details. Also i'm preparing a HLD for this process. I wanna read and go through few same HLD's before i submit my proposal to my client. Please suggest me and help me out.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Arunmozhi.

ACI, 2 BD´s and 2 EPGs in L2 mode won´t talk even with contract supplied

Hi experts
I tried to make a L2 connection between 2 EPG in different BD, both BD are in L2 mode and in the same Private network, I saw in the sniffer that the traffic was send between the EPG ( hosts)  but the "ping" between the hosts did not got answered. we had a contract between the EPG´s that was allow any in both directions.
the connection works between the 2 host  with the 2 EPG´s in the same BD with the same any contract.
is it intended that 2 BDS won´t let 2 EPG´s talk in L2 mode ( Floodmode ) ?.
And I read that the L2 external is not a separate BD but 2 EPG´s in a " L2 construct"  with a contract between and the AEP stuff to get physical to work
/Ola

Just to understand, you created two BDs in flood and L2 mode and two EPGs. The two hosts are using the same subnet/address space to talk to each other and you have a contract in between the two EPGs yet the communication is not working.
When you put the two EPGs in the same BD it works? correct?
Its a very interesting question, but there is something you must remember about ACI. The BD is the flood/forwarding boundary. Since you are using two different flood domains and no routing (unicast off and no subnet/SVI on the BD), ARPs and general data flood/packets will not traverse the flood domains, even with a contract.
What other questions do you have? Thanks for using Support Forums, hope that helps!

Scenario with Contract, PO and GRN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for