Search not returning all results

I'm having a problem with searching a RAID volume on an G5 Xserve running 10.5.7. It doesn't seem to be returning search results correctly. I've tested it by making folders and searching for them over the course of several days, but haven't been able to find them again by file name. I've tried erasing the index file using the mdutil -E, but it hasn't helped. Any one have any ideas?

Hi
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9194446&#9194446
Tony

Similar Messages

Filter item limits - search not returning any results with large number of elements otherwise ok

Hi,
We are working through a problem we've encountered with Azure Search. We are building a filter string based on an "id eq 'xxx' or id eq 'ccc' or id eq 'vvv' etc. The id's are provided in a collection and we loop through, building the string until it's
ready to apply.
We are using 2015-02-28 preview at the moment.
We are encountering a situation where, after approximately 20 id's Azure Search doesn't return any results, nor does it appear to return any error code. I'm pretty sure that the url length is less than 8K.
Is there any limit on the number of filter elements in a query?

We followed up offline.
The symptom in this case was a 200 response with no body. The underlying cause is a URL parsing bug that tries to interpret colons in the query string as the delimiter of a URL scheme (like https:), but with a hard length limit of 1KB. We will work
on a fix for both the underlying URL parsing issue and the issue that caused it to surface as a body-less 200.
In the meantime, the workaround is to put colons as close to the beginning of the URL query string as possible. Specifically, putting $filter and facets first, and putting expressions with colons within those first, will mitigate this in most cases.
Note that the .NET SDK puts $filter and facets near the beginning of the query string by default, so if you're consuming Azure Search you might want to give it a try:
http://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.Azure.Search/

Search not returning all 10 results per page

Anyone seen this?
When i do a search, i don't get all 10 per page...
"Results from your search: 1055. Showing: 1-7."
however, when i hit 'next'
"Results from your search: 1055. Showing: 11-16."
why aren't i seeing 8, 9 17, 18, 19....etc?
6.1 portal

out of the box.
i'm hoping to dodge this issue because i'm upgrading to a new environment in a few weeks hopefully where the search index is rebuilt.

Search not returning all entries

We destroyed our search nodes and cluster on the filesystem in one of our environments and have been working with support to get them back to life. We got the node to startup and we can now search for items without getting a "cant contact search server" error. But we are not seeing enough items in the results.
We tried setting status to 4 in PTSEARCHSTATUS and PTCARDSTATUS and then running a search repair and search update. After doing this, the cards (documents) can be found but only some of the objects such as the portlets are being returned. The search update flipped the status column to a 1 on some items but not all. Communities and community pages are not showing up but portlets are.
Any ideas?

Its working now.
It turns out that the magic number for the PTSEARCHSTATUS table's status column is 1. PTCARDSTATUS takes a 4.
After setting this and running search update (no repair needed) all admin objects were reindexed.

Search not returning desired result

I am looking for a message in the Application Server/Portal Applications forum with the title "created new fields in form". I know this is the title because I printed out the message a while back.
I wanted to go back to it to see if any further posts had been made. When I type the title in the search field, I get some hits, but not the message I am looking for.
Can someone else try using the above search string and check to see if it gets returned?
Thanks!

My wife has been having this same problem for at least 6 months (Leopard and Snow Leopard). I tried the "Rebuild" mailbox option, and I have tried adding/removing the User/Library folder from Spotlight privacy to force a re-index. So far nothing. Does anyone have a clue? My wife uses her Mac for work, and searching through e-mail is a common task of hers. This has made her life extremely difficult.

cm:search is not returning any result when logical operator '!' is used.

<cm:search is not returning any result when logical operator '!' is used.
I am using BEA 9.1 content management services API. When I run the following query I am not receiving any results. Also no error or exceptions are seen in the weblogic or cmspi log.
The query is <cm:search id="docs" query="!(object_name like 'Sport*')" />

HI cam
Thanks for your reply, but i found the problem it was because my server administrator password has changed by network guys... and because of it crawler unable to access the content
I wrote my solution here i hope it will help other people
http://bvs-sharepoint.blogspot.com/2015/03/sharepoint-search-is-not-returning.html
RB

Mac mail search function is not working. Any search term returns all records.

Mac mail search function is not working. Any search term returns all records.

hi eric. many thanks.
i will have to read these links closer but what i meant to say is that the hard drive space that was being taken up seemed like it suddenly jumped way up because i had just gotten through a process in the last month where i am storing all my My Documents data on my Mac Pro. i am doing this in order to decide whether i should just keep it ALL on my Mac Pro and use ChronoSync to sync /some/ of it to my MBP.
so if i look in the Documents folder on my Mac Pro i have a ton of folders that i have created with a ton of data. if i look in the Documents folder on my MBP there are NO folders that have data in them that i created. there are other folders such as folders that various software created but what i mean to point out is that there was a LOT of available space on my HD until recently.
i am wondering if there is some way that running the Mail re-index (it then ran some kind of "Importing" routine) or by syncing my Photostream to the MBP caused a huge jump in data on this drive. if it is the photostream sync i can just take this off or see if it will sync more selectively. if it is something to do with mac mail jumping in size i am not sure why this would happen or what to do about it.
does that question make sense?
i mean, before i did these two operations my recollection is that i would have had 130 GB on the hard drive (really just guessing here) and now there is like 218 GB on the hard drive and i don't know where all this came from...

API Not returning all RTMP ingest endpoints

The web portal shows both URLs for RTMP
rtmp://etcetc.channel.mediaservices.windows.net:1935/live/...
rtmp://etcetc.channel.mediaservices.windows.net:1936/live/...
but the API (ex - myChannel.Input.Endpoints) only returns a single one (...:1935).
Any reason why the web portal and the API don't return the same info?

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that Search is not returning all STS_Web.
You need to set the Trim Duplicates to false, please follow the steps as below:
Export the Search Results Web Part from your page.
Open the .webpart file in your favorite editor.
Search for “Trim Duplicates”, you will find it as part of the DataProviderJSON property.
Set the Trim Duplicates property to
False.
Upload the web part.
Add the web part to your page.
More information:
SharePoint Online Search Results Duplicates “Trap”:
http://www.hartsteve.com/2013/07/sharepoint-online-search-results-duplicates-trap/
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Avoid JDBC sender error: Execute statement did not return a result set

Hi!
My JDBC sender adapter towards MS SQL server works fine, with an Execute statement calling a stored procedure that returns the source data needed. The stored procedure itself updates the status of database table records, so that only the unread records are returned each time the stored procedure is called.
However, the communication channel monitoring sets a red flag for the JDBC sender adapter, when there are no values to fetch from the database table (using the stored procedure). Message says: "Database-level error reported by JDBC driver while executing statement 'EXECUTE FetchMessage 1, 9000'. The JDBC driver returned the following error message: 'com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: The statement did not return a result set.'. For details, contact your database server vendor."
This is not an error situation, as I do not expect there to be any values to fetch from the database at all times.
I do not see how to change the stored procedure to avoid this error.
Is there a parameter to be set on the JDBC adapter that I can use, so the red flag is avoided?
Thanks for any input!
Regards,
Oeystein Emhjellen

Hi Oeystein Emhjellen.
The problem is Store Procedure that has to generate always a ResultSet (or cursor). If it doesn't have a output, you have to generate an Empty ResultSet.
Like a SELECT Statement:
If there are data, SELECT get an output result but if it get nothing the SELECT Statement get a empty ResultSet.
Ask to your database team.
I hope it helps you.
Bruno.

Bing based federated result sources not returning any results for non-English languages

I have a result source with this query:
http://www.bing.com/search?q={?searchterms} language:fr site:msdn.microsoft.com&format=rss&count=50&first={startIndex}
This used to give me 40-50 results for common terms like download, blog etc.
From today (7/14) IST, this source does not return any results. There are no results if I execute this query directly in IE either.
Same behavior observed for: language:es, language:de etc.
I do however get results as expected for language:en.
Any idea what the issue might be?

Hi Swapnil,
According to your description, my understanding is that no results returned when searching with non-English in the Result Source query.
I tested the same scenario per your post and I got the same results as you got.
I recommend to change the language:fr in the Result Source query to be lang=fr to see if the issue still occurs.
More references:
http://kbdump.com/sharepoint-2013-opensearch-search-twitter-facebook-wikipedia-page/
http://richardstk.com/2013/11/08/sharepoint-2013-federated-search-to-bing/
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Basic NOT EXISTS query not returning any results

DB Version: 10gR2
One of our tables in the test schema is having less number of columns than the PROD shema.
To determine which are missing columns in this table in Test schema i did the following.
-----In Test Schema
CREATE TABLE XYZ2
(COL1 NUMBER);        ----------only one column
SQL > CREATE TABLE tables_test_list AS SELECT TABLE_NAME,COLUMN_NAME FROM USER_TAB_COLS;
Table created.--- In the prod schema
SQL> CREATE TABLE XYZ2
2 (COL1 NUMBER,
3 COL2 NUMBER       ----------- same table name with an extra column
4 );
Table createdAnd from the PROD schema i execute the following SQL to determine what are the columns that are missing in the TEST schema
select column_name from User_Tab_Cols outer
where table_name='XYZ2'
and not exists (select 1 from TEST_SCHEMA.tables_test_list inner where outer.TABLE_NAME=inner.TABLE_NAME )But the above query is not returning any results. Any idea why?

Actually, the example from the link I posted earlier:
[email protected]> (
2 select 'IN T1, NOT T2', column_name,data_type,data_length
3    from user_tab_columns
4   where table_name = 'T1'
5 MINUS
6 select 'IN T1, NOT T2', column_name,data_type,data_length
7    from user_tab_columns
8   where table_name = 'T2'
9 )
10 UNION ALL
11 (
12 select 'IN T2, NOT T1', column_name,data_type,data_length
13    from user_tab_columns
14   where table_name = 'T2'
15 MINUS
16 select 'IN T2, NOT T1', column_name,data_type,data_length
17    from user_tab_columns
18   where table_name = 'T1'
19 )
20 /

Table-Valued Function not returning any results

ALTER FUNCTION [dbo].[fGetVendorInfo]
@VendorAddr char(30),
@RemitAddr char(100),
@PmntAddr char(100)
RETURNS
@VendorInfo TABLE
vengroup char(25),
vendnum char(9),
remit char(10),
payment char(10)
AS
BEGIN
insert into @VendorInfo (vengroup,vendnum)
select ks183, ks178
from hsi.keysetdata115
where ks184 like ltrim(@VendorAddr) + '%'
update @VendorInfo
set remit = r.remit
from
@VendorInfo ven
INNER JOIN
(Select ksd.ks188 as remit, ksd.ks183 as vengroup, ksd.ks178 as vendnum
from hsi.keysetdata117 ksd
inner join @VendorInfo ven
on ven.vengroup = ksd.ks183 and ven.vendnum = ksd.ks178
where ksd.ks192 like ltrim(@RemitAddr) + '%'
and ks189 = 'R') r
on ven.vengroup = r.vengroup and ven.vendnum = r.vendnum
update @VendorInfo
set payment = p.payment
from
@VendorInfo ven
INNER JOIN
(Select ksd.ks188 as payment, ksd.ks183 as vengroup, ksd.ks178 as vendnum
from hsi.keysetdata117 ksd
inner join @VendorInfo ven
on ven.vengroup = ksd.ks183 and ven.vendnum = ksd.ks178
where ksd.ks192 like ltrim(@PmntAddr) + '%'
and ks189 = 'P') p
on ven.vengroup = p.vengroup and ven.vendnum = p.vendnum
RETURN
END
GO
Hi all,
I'm having an issue where my Table-Valued Function is not returning any results.
When I break it out into a select statement (creating a table, and replacing the passed in parameters with the actual values) it works fine, but with passing in the same exact values (copy and pasted them) it just retuns an empty table.
The odd thing is I could have SWORN this worked on Friday, but not 100% sure.
The attached code is my function.
Here is how I'm calling it:
SELECT * from dbo.fGetVendorInfo('AUDIO DIGEST', '123 SESAME ST', 'TOP OF OAK MOUNTAIN')
I tried removing the "+ '%'" and passing it in, but it doesn't work.
Like I said if I break it out and run it as T-SQL, it works just fine.
Any assistance would be appreciated.

Why did you use a proprietary user function instead of a VIEW? I know the answer is that your mindset does not use sets. You want procedural code. In fact, I see you use an “f-” prefix to mimic the old FORTRAN II convention for in-line functions!
Did you know that the old Sybase UPDATE.. FROM.. syntax does not work? It gives the wrong answers! Google it.
Your data element names make no sense. What is “KSD.ks188”?? Well, it is a “payment_<something>”, “KSD.ks183” is “vendor_group” and “KSD.ks178” is “vendor_nbr” in your magical world where names mean different things from table to table!
An SQL programmer might have a VIEW with the information, something like:
CREATE VIEW Vendor_Addresses
AS
SELECT vendor_group, vendor_nbr, vendor_addr, remit_addr, pmnt_addr
FROM ..
WHERE ..;
--CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking
in Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL

Wierd Coherence bug with keySet() / entrySet() not returning all data.

So I have a cache with 3 key/values in it.
If I call cache (over extend) with specific keys, i get all values back.
Object valueA = namedCache.get("A");
Object valueB = namedCache.get("B");
Object valueC = namedCache.get("C");
i.e. valueA/B/C are all not null.
If I now try to use keySet()/entrySet(), I only get 1 value back.
eg:
int cacheSize= namedCache.size(); //cache size is 3
int keySetSize = namedCache.keySet(); //cache size is 3
int actualKeySetSize = (new HashSet(namedCache.keySet())).size(); // actual size is 1
The same happens if I iterate over keyset/entryset, i.e. there is only 1 value in the result.
I have 2 storage nodes, JMX shows 1 node has 1 unit and other node shows cache has 2 units.
Are there any known bugs where above can occur, we are using Oracle Coherence GE 3.5.3/465p3.
i.e. keySet/entrySet not returning full result sets!
Cheers,
Neville.

Apparently a timing issue between the "creation" of a cache, and the processing of requests against that cache. Because of the nature of the cache creation protocol, it is possible for the client creating the cache to return before all storage members have been notified of the cache name. It is therefore possible for cache requests to arrive at a storage member before that member has had a chance to instantiate its backing map.
Fix is part of 3.6.0 GA, and is now slated to be back ported for 3.5.3p8.
Have tested against 3.6 and all looks ok now.

Directory - Org Unit Listing Not Returning Any Results

Hello Everyone,
We are using Nakisa v4.1 on EHP7.0 at the moment. In the user interface, Directory > Org Unit Listing is not returning any results while Employee and Position Listings are working just fine.
What would be the cause ?
Appreciate your help,
Kind regards

Hi,
I am using a live build copied from SAP_Live_RFC.
Below you can find what the cds.log says when I try to search an organizational unit.
2289. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:22 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - ...Request is not required to be verified. For action: setsearch. For processor OrgChartAppEventProcessor
2290. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:22 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - Invoking action:setsearch [ORGUNIT_NAME, contains, deneme]. For processor OrgChartAppEventProcessor. Against controller OrgChartCtr
2291. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:22 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - Strings.decodeURIComponent , encoded=deneme , decoded= deneme
2292. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:22 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - ...Request is not required to be verified. For action: updateNotifications. For processor NotificationsProcessor
2293. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:22 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - Invoking action:updateNotifications []. For processor NotificationsProcessor. Against controller NotificationsCtr
2294. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:22 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - updateNotifications on NotificationsProcessor took: 1ms
2295. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:22 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - FunctionRunner.executeFunctionDirect: /NAKISA/OC_OU_LISTING took: 32ms
2296. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:22 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - setsearch on OrgChartAppEventProcessor took: 86ms
2297. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:22 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - com.nakisa.framework.utility.PostRequestActionRegister.callAction(PostRequestAction) : Calling: PostRequestAction [class=com.nakisa.framework.data.commandProcessor.impl.sap.FunctionRunner, method=releaseAllClients]
2298. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:25 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - ...Request is not required to be verified. For action: setsearch. For processor OrgChartAppEventProcessor
2299. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:25 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - Invoking action:setsearch [ORGUNIT_NAME, contains, test]. For processor OrgChartAppEventProcessor. Against controller OrgChartCtr
2300. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:25 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - Strings.decodeURIComponent , encoded=test , decoded= test
2301. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:25 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - ...Request is not required to be verified. For action: updateNotifications. For processor NotificationsProcessor
2302. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:25 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - Invoking action:updateNotifications []. For processor NotificationsProcessor. Against controller NotificationsCtr
2303. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:25 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - FunctionRunner.executeFunctionDirect: /NAKISA/OC_OU_LISTING took: 28ms
2304. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:25 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - updateNotifications on NotificationsProcessor took: 1ms
2305. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:25 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - setsearch on OrgChartAppEventProcessor took: 73ms
2306. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:25 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - com.nakisa.framework.utility.PostRequestActionRegister.callAction(PostRequestAction) : Calling: PostRequestAction [class=com.nakisa.framework.data.commandProcessor.impl.sap.FunctionRunner, method=releaseAllClients]
2307. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:28 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - ...Request is not required to be verified. For action: setsearch. For processor OrgChartAppEventProcessor
2308. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:28 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - Invoking action:setsearch [ORGUNIT_NAME, contains, kalite]. For processor OrgChartAppEventProcessor. Against controller OrgChartCtr
2309. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:28 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - Strings.decodeURIComponent , encoded=kalite , decoded= kalite
2310. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:28 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - ...Request is not required to be verified. For action: updateNotifications. For processor NotificationsProcessor
2311. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:28 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - Invoking action:updateNotifications []. For processor NotificationsProcessor. Against controller NotificationsCtr
2312. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:28 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - updateNotifications on NotificationsProcessor took: 1ms
2313. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:28 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - FunctionRunner.executeFunctionDirect: /NAKISA/OC_OU_LISTING took: 43ms
2314. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:28 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - setsearch on OrgChartAppEventProcessor took: 94ms
2315. 18 Apr 2014 07:05:28 INFO com.nakisa.Logger - com.nakisa.framework.utility.PostRequestActionRegister.callAction(PostRequestAction) : Calling: PostRequestAction [class=com.nakisa.framework.data.commandProcessor.impl.sap.FunctionRunner, method=releaseAllClients]
Regards.

Search query returning ALL records

DW CS3 - MS Access - ASP/VBScript
I have a search form for records to display on the same page with keywords highlighted. The search is returning ALL records and highlighting keywords throughout rather than returning specific records with the searched word. What am I missing? I'm sure it's something terribly simple.....
          <input name="search" type="text" id="search" value="<%= Request.QueryString("search") %>" />
          SELECT item, item, item, item
          FROM tbl_name
          WHERE item OR item OR item LIKE %MMColParam%
          ORDER BY sql_orderby, Date DESC
          Name: MMColParam
          Type: Text
          Value: Request.Querystring("search")
          Default Value: %

I was using the word "item" as an example for multiple columns without actually naming them - they are not the same. I should've used this example:
SELECT shoes, socks, hats, gloves
FROM tbl_apparel
WHERE shoes OR socks OR hats LIKE %MMColParam%
ORDER BY sql_orderby, Date DESC
In the past, I had four duplicate query parameters for four columns which worked fine. But since I only have one search term, I thought I could eliminate three of the duplicate parameters and use just one with the OR statement.
In the past, you questioned me on this. You stated, "You only have one search term and so all of the parameters have the same value, but DW still wants to creates 4 parameters. If you were coding this by hand you wouldn't do it that way, but DW's one-size-fits-all code generates four seperate parms. It's nothing to worry about."

Search not returning all results

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for