SecureFile Deduplication and Partition

Dear all,
I try to understand the following statements that are written in the Oracle Database Large Object and SecureFile developer's Guide 11g Rel 2:
- Duplicate detection happens within a LOB segment. For partitioned and
subpartitioned LOB columns duplicate detection does not span partitions or
subpartitions.
- Deduplication can be specified at a partition level. The lob_storage_clause
enables specification for partitioned tables on a per-partition basis.As I understand, the first statement saying that the deduplication cannot detect a duplication among different partition. What is this to do with "duplication detection happens within a LOB segment"?
I understand the second statement saying that deduplication can detect duplication when it occurs in the same partition. Is this correct?
Regards,
Val

LOB segments can be partitioned.
http://www.morganslibrary.org/reference/partitions.html

Similar Messages

Use the default format and partition step to format disk0 partition 1 in multiple disks sutiation

As we know,we need to disable the default format and partition step in ts to let mdt deploy os on C and leave the other partitions stay safe when there is only one disk on pc，and the way of installing operation system is logical drive letter store in a varible.
But what if there are 2 disks on pc，and for a record the disk 0 is always the OS disk,don't need to confirmed this.How can we modify the format and partition step to format only C on disk0 under this condition?then lead the mdt to do the rest deployment
by itself.
Thanks

You are pushing up against the design limits of MDT, and the more complex and/or arbitrary the disk configuration the harder it is for MDT to perform installations.
If you want to maintain the *existing* disk configuration, and just update the OS present, then the recommended course of action is to run MDT from *within* the OS (cscript.exe
\\server\deploymentshare$\scripts\litetouch.vbs), not from WinPE. When you do this, it's called a "refresh" scenario. MDT can capture the user files via USMT, and it knows which
partitions to use, because it's launched from within the OS itself.
Disabling the default Format and Partition step has other unintended consequences.
Keith Garner - Principal Consultant [owner] -
http://DeploymentLive.com

How to Create a Table with Merge and partitions in HANA

Hi,
What is the best way to create a Table with MERGE and PARTITION and UNLOAD PRIORITIES.
Any body can you please give me some examples.
Regards,
Deva

Ok,
1) the UNLOAD PRIORITY has nothing to do with the order of data loads in your ETL process
2) Unloading of columns will happen automatically. Don't specify anything specific for the tables, then SAP HANA will take care about it
3) Not sure where you get your ideas from, but there is no need to manually "flush" tables or anything like that. SAP HANA will take care of memory housekeeping.
4) Partitioning and how to specify it for tables has been largely documented. Just read up on it.
5) Delta Merge will happen automatically, as long as you don't prevent it (e.g. by trying to outsmart the mergedog rules)
Seriously, I get the impressions that this list of requirements is based on some hear-say and lack of actual information and experience with SAP HANA. There are a couple of extensive discussions on data loading optimization available here in SCN and on SAPHANA.COM. Please read those first.
All this had been discussed broadly a couple of times.
- Lars

Task Sequence Windows Server 2012 format and partition issue when using MDT2012

Hi all,
Currently I'm working on a task sequence to deploy a Windows Server 2012 image. We've integrated MDT2012 Update 1 in SCCM2012 SP1 and created a default 'Server Task Sequence'. This task sequence deploys the install.wim to a server which has multiple disks
attached.
We've configured multiple format and partition disk steps to create the following partition layout:
Disk 0: 499MB BDEDrive (do not assign drive letter) + 40GB OSDisk
Disk 1: 40GB Programs
Disk 2: 40GB Data
Disk 3: 25GB User
When the task sequence is finished I've noticed the drive letters assigned to the disk are not correct. In some cases the BDEdrive gets drive letter D assigned, sometimes drive letters are assigned starting with E, thus skipping drive
letter D.
The smsts.log files show an error when it's re-assigning drive letters after booting into Windows. Looks like an error in the DiskPartScript.txt.
<![LOG[==============================[ OSDSetupHook.exe ]==============================]LOG]!><time="16:59:40.889-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="776"
file="osdsetuphook.cpp:186">
<![LOG[Executing task sequence]LOG]!><time="16:59:40.905-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="776" file="osdsetuphook.cpp:279">
<![LOG[Loading the Task Sequencing Environment from "C:\_SMSTaskSequence\TSEnv.dat".]LOG]!><time="16:59:40.920-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="776"
file="basesetuphook.cpp:366">
<![LOG[Environment scope successfully created: Global\{51A016B6-F0DE-4752-B97C-54E6F386A912}]LOG]!><time="16:59:40.936-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="776"
file="environmentscope.cpp:659">
<![LOG[Environment scope successfully created: Global\{BA3A3900-CA6D-4ac1-8C28-5073AFC22B03}]LOG]!><time="16:59:40.936-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="776"
file="environmentscope.cpp:659">
<![LOG[Debug shell is enabled]LOG]!><time="16:59:43.806-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="776" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1440">
<![LOG[Successfully enabled debug command shell support.]LOG]!><time="16:59:43.884-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="776" file="debugwindow.cpp:156">
<![LOG[Configuring local administrator account]LOG]!><time="16:59:43.884-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="776" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1462">
<![LOG[Re-assign all drive letters...]LOG]!><time="16:59:43.884-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="776" file="diskutils.cpp:1941">
<![LOG[Executing command line: "C:\WINDOWS\system32\diskpart.exe" /s "C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\DiskPartScript.txt"]LOG]!><time="16:59:43.900-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context=""
type="1" thread="776" file="commandline.cpp:827">
<![LOG[Process completed with exit code 2147942487]LOG]!><time="16:59:50.249-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="776" file="commandline.cpp:1123">
<![LOG[Diskpart.exe STDOUT:
Microsoft DiskPart version 6.1.7601
Copyright (C) 1999-2008 Microsoft Corporation.
On computer: SRV03
Volume 1 is the selected volume.
DiskPart successfully removed the drive letter or mount point.
The volume you selected is not valid or does not exist.
There is no volume selected.
]LOG]!><time="16:59:50.249-120" date="05-10-2013" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="3" thread="776" file="diskutils.cpp:1807">
When I take a look at the generated diskpart_script.log file the volume D gets selected twice, which fails the second time because of the first remove drive letter command.
This is the output in the diskpart_script.log file:
select volume D
remove letter=D
select volume D
remove letter=D
select volume E
remove letter=E
select volume F
remove letter=F
select volume H
remove letter=H
select disk 0
select partition 1
assign
select disk 1
select partition 1
assign
select disk 2
select partition 1
assign
select disk 3
select partition 1
assign
It seems this error is caused by the first 'Format and Partition Disk' step before the 'Use Toolkit Package' step which is part of the default Server Task sequence. When I disable this Format and Partition step and create the partition manually
all looks ok showing no errors in the smsts.log file.
I've solved this by replacing the first 'Format and Partition Disk' step by an Powershell command which formats and partitions the disk.
Anyone seen this behavior?

I have a similar problem when I install windows on some clients. Have you found any explanation for the behavior?

I am having sporadic issues after new hard drive install and recovery using Time Machine. The same sluggish response, start up screen pixelating...If I reinstall Lion will it wipe out other applications? My HD was formatted and partitioned correctly, I ha

I am having sporadic issues after new hard drive install and recovery using Time Machine. The same sluggish response, start up screen pixelating...If I reinstall Lion will it wipe out other applications? My HD was formatted and partitioned correctly, I have a late 2009 iMac.

Use the trackpad to scroll, thats what it was designed for. The scroll bars automatically disappear when not being used and will appear if you scroll up or down using the trackpad.
This is a user-to-user forum and most people will post on here if they have problems. You very rarely get people posting to say there update went smooth. The fact is the vast majority of Mountain Lion users will not be experiencing any major problems with the OS, or maybe with apps which are not compatible, but thats hardly Apple's fault if developers don't update their apps.

MDT Config UEFI Specific disk and partition?

Installing Win8.1 with MDT2013 on UEFI enabled machines everything seems to be ok.. Until... Injecting drivers. The deployment cannot proceed because of destination disk. Sounds obvious because Uefi makes multiple partitions unlike non-uefi that can be installed
on the first partition.
I've created an extra step to the "Format and partition disk" and named it "Format and Partition Disk - UEFI". In this step I've set an option "Task sequence variable IsUEFI equals True". So when it is "True" the step
will format the drive in GPT (as is required for UEFI boot). This seems to work good. I see in the installation the step "Format and Partition Disk - UEFI" when it's a uefi machine, and the original step if it is a non uefi machine. Obviously the
original step will have also an option "Task sequence variable IsUEFI equals False".
The problem comes when we get to the step "Install Operating System". Here I made the same change like I did above. (added extra step with extra option:
The original step "Install Operating System" will have install location: "Specific disk and partition"
Disk 0 Partition 1.
The added step will have install location "Specific disk and partition"
Disk 0 Partition 3. (Because UEFI has multiple partitions)
For some reason the deployment will accept the step "Format and Partition Disk - UEFI" but in the install step it will take the "Install Operating System - Legacy" (so it will try to install to disk 0 partition 1 as I see in BCD log).
Is there any reason that the same condition works at the format step and not at the install step?
We choose the option install to "Specific disk and partition" because of problem when have the location set at "logical drive letter stored in a variable" (problem described:
link)

Solution in my case was going for the "logical drive letter stored in a variable" instead of "Specific disk and partition".
Note when applying this: must keep using "OSDisk" variable or it will throw errors (problem described in
this link)
So I deleted the "UEFI" steps, and renamed the "Install Operating System - Legacy" to before. Removed the query for the IsUEFI variable. MDT will automatic install to MBR or GPT based on device.

This disk doesn't contain an EFI system partition. If you want to start up your computer with this disk or include it in a RAID set, back up your data and partition this disk.

As stated above. I get this when I try to resize my HD. Was having issues with BootCamp so I removed it and got this.
This disk doesn’t contain an EFI system partition. If you want to start up your computer with this disk or include it in a RAID set, back up your data and partition this disk.

the same problem...
any help?

How do I install LION and partition SL 10.6.8 run on same imac?

Hello If one could tell me step by step instructions:
I would like to install LION ( because icloud), but can I install LION and partition the OS so that my imac can run both SL 10.6.8 and LION?
SL 10.6.8 still runs some applications that LION will never be able to run.
So I really need LION installed,but also have SL 10.6.8 partitioned so I can run imovie HD6 with plug ins with SL 10.6.8.
Please if this can be done so I can run Lion and SL 10.6.8 on same computer
thank you so much in advance
please advise
scott

Wow, thank you Niel. I have looked on this site and have found many different ways listed on partitioning and using 2 OS on a computer. But there steps seemed very long and tedious- but of course if that is what is needed then i would do it that way. Again i was seeing a lot of different ways. But yours seemed direct.
I went thru the steps up until using the thumb drive for LION to install. I went in to disk utilities, i selected mydrive, clicked on the partition tab, and then i saw i had 96.7 GB available--without changing SL10.6.8 HD size.
it looks like you can drag and increase/decrease the partitions with the mouse control.
I really need LION for icloud, and if so all other applications EXCEPT imovieHD6
So i need to run SL for imovieHD6 the other applications like word, adobe creative suite, excel, etc ican use LION.
do you recommend having the partitions equal in GB?
I have a 250gb hard drive
should I split the partitions evenly between the two OS?
or should one OS get more GB than another?

How to use SQL OVER and PARTITION BY in OBIEE Expression Builder??

Hi there,
I want to create a new logical coulmn with the following SQL query.
SUM(Inventory Detail.Qty) OVER(PARTITION BY Inventory Detail.A,Inventory Detail.B,Item.C,Inventory Detail.D,MyDATE )/SUM(Inventory Detail.Qty) OVER(PARTITION BY Inventory Detail.A,Inventory Detail.B,Item.C )
How to use the OVER and PARTITION BY in OBIEE Expression Builder??
Thanks in Advance

hi bipin,
We cant use by in Expression builder(rpd) .But use the same formula like this in Fx of answers
SUM(Inventory Detail.Qty) OVER(PARTITION BY Inventory Detail.A,Inventory Detail.B,Item.C,Inventory Detail.D,MyDATE )/SUM(Inventory Detail.Qty) >OVER(PARTITION BY Inventory Detail.A,Inventory Detail.B,Item.C )SUM(Inventory Detail.Qty by Detail,ITEM,Mydate)/SUM(qty by detail,item)
First check the numerator whether it was giving correct results or not then go with denominator
compare the results with sql that u have
Let me know if that does work
thanks,
saichand.v
Edited by: Saichand Varanasi on Jul 27, 2010 9:27 PM
Edited by: Saichand Varanasi on Jul 27, 2010 9:28 PM

Should I use a 16gb SSD for my /boot and / partitions?

Should I use a SSD for /boot and / partitions or just not even bother with one so small?
EDIT: For the sake of another thread. You think Arch would run just fine on a PIII 733mhz, 128mb RAM computer? Grandmother gave it to me after she got herself a new one (one I built lol).
Last edited by Zetsumei (2009-04-14 23:36:08)

Berticus wrote:As for SSD, that's really up to you. Personally, I would do it. Would love inexpensive SSD hard drives that could hold TB's.
Its only a matter of time before prices on SSD drop so I'm gonna wait for bigger to be less expensive.

Materialized view and Partition

Hi,
I want to discuss a scenario, with which i am dealing nowadays. there is only a single table (named livecdr ) has 22-23 fields and the records are updating in every sec (on daily basis) and in 24hrs livecdr contains approximately more than 2 crore records.
Problem is that the query processing time is so slow due to large number of records and query is fetching records from a view created on livecdr table. I want to know the options, how the query would fetch these records in a short time. Firstly i did range partitioning on livecdr and then i created materlized view but the view didn't create on partition table and when i removed partitioning it was created. After view creation, query performance is much better. i also applied indexing on livecdr.
Can you please tell me, whether this approach is okay or i am doing mistake. should i create partitioning on materialized view and how would i select records from view if partitioning would be applied on materialized view. Please guide me with best approaches.
thankyou.

Hello,
Here is how I created partitioned table (monthly partitions) and partitioned mview on the table. This is just an example you might have to change the mview partitions from monhtly to yearly or quartely.
CREATE TABLE live_cdr
   CALLID              VARCHAR2 (20),
   CD                  VARCHAR2 (25),
   CG                  VARCHAR2 (25),
   RE                  VARCHAR2 (25),
   OPC                 VARCHAR2 (12),
   DPC                 VARCHAR2 (12),
   STIME               VARCHAR2 (25),
   SDATE               DATE,
   ATIME               VARCHAR2 (25),
   ADATE               DATE,
   ETIME               VARCHAR2 (25),
   EDATE               DATE,
   schangeTime         VARCHAR2 (25),
   schangeDate         DATE,
   STATUS              VARCHAR2 (25),
   bucket              NUMBER (20),
   CIC                 NUMBER (20),
   charge              VARCHAR2 (30),
   ported              VARCHAR2 (30),
   jurisdiction_Info   VARCHAR2 (30),
   origLine_Info       CHAR (1),
   Variant             NUMBER,
   auto_inc            NUMBER
PARTITION BY RANGE (EDATE)
PARTITION LIVE_CDR_JAN_2009 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2009-02-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS,
PARTITION LIVE_CDR_FEB_2009 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2009-03-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
);Mview definition
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW KLONDIKE.LIVE_CDR_MV
LOGGING
PARTITION BY RANGE (EDATE)
PARTITION LIVE_CDR_MV_JAN_2009 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20090201',
      'YYYYMMDD'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS,
PARTITION LIVE_CDR_MV_FEB_2009 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20090301',
      'YYYYMMDD'))
    LOGGING
    NOCOMPRESS
BUILD IMMEDIATE
REFRESH COMPLETE
START WITH SYSDATE
NEXT SYSDATE + 2 /24
AS
SELECT   DISTINCT (ic.callid) callid,
                  ic.CG,
                  ic.CD,
                  ic.RE,
                  ic.OPC,
                  ic.DPC,
                  ic.SDATE,
                  ic.STIME,
                  ac.ADATE,
                  ac.ATIME,
                  ec.ETIME,
                  ec.EDATE,
                  ec.STATUS
FROM   live_cdr ic, live_cdr ac, live_cdr ec
WHERE       ic.callid = ac.callid
         AND ic.callid = ec.callid
         AND ic.stime = ac.stime
         AND ic.stime = ec.stime
         AND ic.sdate = ac.sdate
         AND ic.sdate = ec.sdate
         AND ac.ADATE IS NOT NULL
         AND ec.EDATe IS NOT NULL
         AND ec.etime IS NOT NULL
         AND ic.CD IS NOT NULL
         AND ic.cg IS NOT NULL;Regards

IB Queue: Can a Queue be Unordered and Partitioned at the same same time?

Hi,
My question is related to Unordered Queue:
Can a Queue be Unordered and Partitioned at the same same time?
From PeopleBooks: Managing Service Operation Queues
"Unordered:
Select to enable field partioning and to process service operations unordered.
By default, the check box is cleared and inbound service operations that are assigned to a queue are processed one at a time sequentially in the order that they are sent.
Select to force the channel to handle all of its service operations in parallel (unordered), which does not guarantee a particular processing sequence. This disables the channel’s partitioning fields.
Clear this check box if you want all of the queues’s service operations processed sequentially or if you want to use the partitioning fields."
This seems to indicate that Unordered queues don't use partitioned fields. Yet, there are a few delivered Queues that are Unordered and have one or more Partition fields selected.
EOEN_MSG_CHNL
PSXP_MSG_CHNL
SERVICE_ORDERS
How does partitioning work in this case? Or is partitioning ignored in such cases?
Thanks!

I guess you could use reflection and do something like the following:
import java.lang.reflect.Constructor ;
import java.lang.reflect.Method ;
public class MyClass<T> implements Cloneable {
T a ;
public MyClass ( final T a ) {
    // super ( ) ; // Superfluous
    this.a = a ;
public MyClass<T> clone ( ) {
    MyClass<T> o = null ;
    try { o = (MyClass<T>) super.clone ( ) ; }
    catch ( Exception e ) { e.printStackTrace ( ) ; System.exit ( 1 ) ; }
    o.a = null ;
    // See if there is an accessible clone method and if there is use it.
    Class<T> c = (Class<T>) a.getClass ( ) ;
    Method m = null ;
    try {
      m = c.getMethod ( "clone" ) ;
      o.a = (T) m.invoke ( a ) ;
    } catch ( NoSuchMethodException nsme ) {
      System.err.println ( "NoSuchMethodException on clone." ) ;
      // See if there is a copy constructor an if so use it.
      Constructor<T> constructor = null ;
      try {
        System.err.println ( c.getName ( ) ) ;
        constructor = c.getConstructor ( c ) ;
        o.a = constructor.newInstance ( a ) ;
      } catch ( Exception e ) { e.printStackTrace ( ) ; System.exit ( 1 ) ; }
    } catch ( Exception e ) { e.printStackTrace ( ) ; System.exit ( 1 ) ; }
    return o ;
public String toString ( ) { return "[ " + ( ( a == null ) ? "" : a.toString ( ) ) + " ]" ; }
public static void main ( final String[] args ) {
    MyClass<String> foo = new MyClass<String> ( "zero" ) ;
    MyClass<String> fooClone = foo.clone ( ) ;
    System.out.println ( "foo = " + foo ) ;
    System.out.println ( "fooClone = " + fooClone ) ;
}

Reference partitioning and partition pruning

Hi All,
I am on v 11.2.0.3.
I have a pair of typical parent-child tables. Child table is growing like hell, hence we want to partition it, which will be used for deleting/dropping old data later on.
There is no partitioning key in the child table which I can use for relating the data to the time when data was created. So, I thought I can use the timestamp from parent table for partitioning the parent table and reference partition the child table.
I am more concerned about the child table (or the queries running on the child table) in terms of performance. ITEM_LIST_ID from the child table is extensively used in queries to access data from child table.
How will partition pruning work when the child table is queried on the foreign key? will it every time go to the parent table, find out the partition and then resolve the partition for child table?
The setup is given in the scripts below, will it cause lot of locking (to resolve partitions)? or am I worrying for nothing?
Here are the scripts
CREATE TABLE ITEM_LISTS /* Parent table, tens of thousands of records */
ITEM_LIST_ID    NUMBER(10)     NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, /* Global index on partitioned table !!! */
LIST_NAME       VARCHAR2(500) NOT NULL,
FIRST_INSERTED TIMESTAMP(6)   NOT NULL
PARTITION BY RANGE ( FIRST_INSERTED )
partition p0 values less than ( to_date('20130101','YYYYMMDD') ),
partition p201301 values less than ( to_date('20130201','YYYYMMDD') ),
partition p201302 values less than ( to_date('20130301','YYYYMMDD') ),
partition p201303 values less than ( to_date('20130401','YYYYMMDD') ),
partition p201304 values less than ( to_date('20130501','YYYYMMDD') ),
partition p201305 values less than ( to_date('20130601','YYYYMMDD') )
CREATE INDEX ITEM_LISTS_IDX1 ON ITEM_LISTS ( LIST_NAME ) LOCAL ;
CREATE TABLE ITEM_LIST_DETAILS /* Child table, millions of records */
ITEM_ID        NUMBER(10)     NOT NULL,
ITEM_LIST_ID   NUMBER(10)     NOT NULL, /* Always used in WHERE clause by lots of big queries */
CODE           VARCHAR2(30)   NOT NULL,
ALT_CODE       VARCHAR2(30)   NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT   ITEM_LIST_DETAILS_FK
FOREIGN KEY ( ITEM_LIST_ID ) REFERENCES ITEM_LISTS
PARTITION BY REFERENCE ( ITEM_LIST_DETAILS_FK )
CREATE INDEX ITEM_LIST_DETAILS_IDX1 ON ITEM_LIST_DETAILS (ITEM_ID) LOCAL;
CREATE INDEX ITEM_LIST_DETAILS_IDX2 ON ITEM_LIST_DETAILS (ITEM_LIST_ID, CODE) LOCAL;Any thoughts / opinions / corrections ?
Thanks in advance

To check how partition pruning works here, I inserted some data in these tables. Inserted data in ITEM_LISTS (parent) from DBA_OBJECTS ( object_id => item_list_id, object_name => list_name, first_inserted => manually created). Also created corresponding child data in ITEM_LIST_DETAILS, so that, for every item_list_id in parent about 5000 records go in child table.
Looking at the queries and plan below, my question is, what exactly does the operations "PARTITION REFERENCE SINGLE" and "PARTITION REFERENCE ITERATOR" imply ??
I gave a search on "PARTITION REFERENCE ITERATOR" in Oracle 11.2 documentation, it says "No exact match found" !!
/* Direct query on child table */
SQL> select count(*) from item_list_details where item_list_id = 6323 ;
COUNT(*)
      5000
1 row selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2798904155
| Id | Operation                   | Name                   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |                        |     1 |     5 |    22   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE             |                        |     1 |     5 |            |          |       |       |
|   2 |   PARTITION REFERENCE SINGLE|                        | 5000 | 25000 |    22   (0)| 00:00:01 |   KEY |   KEY |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN         | ITEM_LIST_DETAILS_IDX2 | 5000 | 25000 |    22   (0)| 00:00:01 |   KEY |   KEY |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("ITEM_LIST_ID"=6323)
SQL> select * from temp1; /* Dummy table to try out some joins */
OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME
      6598 WRH$_INTERCONNECT_PINGS
1 row selected.
/* Query on child table, joining with some other table */
SQL> select count(*)
2 from temp1 d, ITEM_LIST_DETAILS i1
3 where d.object_id = i1.item_list_id
4 and d.object_name = 'WRH$_INTERCONNECT_PINGS';
COUNT(*)
      5000
1 row selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2288153583
| Id | Operation                      | Name                   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |                        |     1 |    70 |    24   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE                |                        |     1 |    70 |            |       | |       |
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS                 |                        | 5000 |   341K|    24   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|* 3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL           | TEMP1                  |     1 |    65 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   4 |    PARTITION REFERENCE ITERATOR|                        | 5000 | 25000 |    21   (0)| 00:00:01 |   KEY |   KEY |
|* 5 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | ITEM_LIST_DETAILS_IDX2 | 5000 | 25000 |    21   (0)| 00:00:01 |   KEY |   KEY |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - filter("D"."OBJECT_NAME"='WRH$_INTERCONNECT_PINGS')
   5 - access("D"."OBJECT_ID"="I1"."ITEM_LIST_ID")

Flashack table and partitions??

Hi All,
Can We use the flash back tables with partitions...
Any idea or any document about Flash back table and partitions relationship in 11 or 10g would help...
Thanks

Hi,
we need to input PRT material Number and get in which and all tasklists it is being used
Our PRT material number is of 12 digits and i could not find any suitable field to input the PRT material number in the table PLFH
our PRT is like this
FA115200A001
how to input these PRT material numbers and get the required data
regards,
Madhu Kiran

Parallel Execution and Partitioning ?

Hi,
Can anybody explain me -- "How to implement Parallel execution and Partitioning in Data Warehouse?" on a single server.
Any examples related to implement Parallel Execution helps me a lot.
Thanks in Advance,
-Vency

Hi Vency,
Try posting this in the following forum:
General Database Discussions
Thanks, Mark

SecureFile Deduplication and Partition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for