Security issues on forms.

I am new and in need of some assistance.  I got the Adobe 9 program to enable me to create forms not only for our website but for use internally for inter- office information and to send to customers.  Any computer that does not have the Adobe 9 program on it can pull up the forms, but there is a message at the top saying that they cannot save data typed into the form.  It requires them to print the form and fax or scan it in.  It says that it will only send a data file, not the form itself with the information that they input on it.  I have gone round and round looking for the answer but cannot find it.  I was under the impression that anyone who has Adobe Reader would be able to use these forms in this fashion.  Your help would be greatly appreciated.  If I have posted this to the wrong forum, I apologize.  Let me know where to go.  (Be kind! )

Hi Bill,
I am sure I could figure out how to download the data into a form myself, but I have multiple people that will be sending out the form to customers to get information (non-sensitive) and they are not going to have a clue how to do it.  We want them to be able to get the information back and simply attached to the customers files without having to print and fetch.
I just don't get how that can violate any lisence when I am using my program to do it.
Every time I think I am getting a handle on this program, I catch a right hook!  I recently discovered that Adobe 9 and LifeCycle were actually two different programs that are not necessarily compatible!!  Not compatible???  I know now that they have two different forums, but don't know what questions are appropriate for which forum.  I think if I had a better understanding of exactly what I bought (ie, the program), I would be so much better off.  I have spent quite a bit of time in the tutorial area of the website and found very little about what I was actually looking for.  Sorry man, just blowing off some steam....thanks for listening.
Have a great weekend.

Similar Messages

  • Can I create a form that doesn't trigger Acrobat's JavaScript disabled / security issues warning?

    Hello,
    Can I create a pdf that doesn't trigger Acrobat's JavaScript is currently disabled and this document uses it for some features.  Enabling JavaScript can lead to potential security issues.
    I even get this error when I create a blank pdf.
    I'm not using any JavaScript in the form and the nature of the message might tend to be a bit scary to some people since it mentions enabling JS can lead to potential security issues.  I basically want to disable the messaging of a feature I'm not even using.
    Anyone know if this is possible and if so, how I go about it?
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    I too share your frustration!!
    Unfortunately I do not have a complete answer for you.
    From the start I must say that Stefan Cameron has been very helpful (http://forms.stefcameron.com/2010/01/14/acrobatreader-9-3-now-available/), however I have not had sufficient time available to deal with the issue (or find a satisfactory resolution).
    The original post that Srini shared with you related to an XFA form that had FormCalc and Javascript in it. I will now share with you another situation that is closer to your experiences.
    Sometimes where we have a complex solution/form, we often give our users a PDF with instructions and demonstrations. We generate these using Adobe products:
    LiveCycle Designer ES to generate the solution/form;
    Captivate to record the demonstration (.swf);
    Acrobat to package it up in a static PDF.
    The screen shots below are from a PDF that includes written instructions and six Flash (.swf) files. The PDF does NOT include fields/form objects and does NOT include any FormCalc or Javascript.
    One of the big sells in Acrobat 9 was that Adobe had fully integrated Flash (Adobe product, ex. Macromedia) into Acrobat 9. This mean that .swf files could run natively inside a PDF. Brilliant!!!  The website today is still pushing this message, for example:
    Now bear in mind that the following screenshots are from a PDF that does not contain any scripting - its sole purpose is to "inform" the user, "look as good as the work I put into it", incorporate instruction and "multimedia" in a "single polished file" and I should be "confident that my audience will be able to view my work exactly as intended".
    Not so!!
    When the user now opens the form, all looks OK. No warning. They can read the instructions and scroll down to the multimedia (.swf files).
    However when the user clicks on the multimedia, the yellow bar appears:
    I go through the "trust" process:
    And the PDF looks like it is OK, no yellow bar. When I click on the multimedia, it begins to play - yes!! BUT ONLY FOR A SECOND OR TWO AND THEN IT STOPS AND GOES BACK TO THE START - AGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!. I would apologise for shouting, but this is beyond frustration. The work in capturing six screencasts in Captivate, annotating them, publishing to .swf and packaging up in Acrobat has been a complete waste of time. Worse than that I now have several PDFs out there, that do not work. Good advertisement for my business? I don't think so!!
    The document that Stefan provided (Managing JavaScript Execution in the Acrobat Family of Products) does not mention Flash/.swf as being a problem. However I would recommend that you go through this document, as it may help you.
    So, where to now? I don't know. The previous posts and Stefan's responses have several urls that may help. You should maybe consider logging your experiences as a bug (log at Adobe).
    In the meantime good luck,
    Niall
    UPDATE:
    This behaviour (.swf playing for only a few seconds) happens in PDFs where the .swf is inserted as legacy media to run in earlier versions of Acrobat/Reader. In this case Acrobat/Reader is making an external call to Flash Player. Hence the yellow bar. However it does not explain why the Flash video still does not play when trusted.
    If the .swf is added into the PDF as Flash media to run on Acrobat 9 and above, then it works without displaying the yellow warning bar.
    So maybe any feature of your PDF that calls an external resource is likely to show the yellow warning bar.

  • I lost my Security issues,how  i can find  it .-form  china

    sorry  about that,i am not  good at  english,i  want  to buy  something  from the  APP store,then  it  told me press the  security issues.But i have  forgot,and  i can;t  find  where  i  can  ask for help  .please   contact me  soon.  email :[email protected]
    你好,我是来自中国的一位小姑娘。我不擅长英文。今天我充值了1万元进入APP账户,我想购买游戏用的。但是首次购买游戏币,需要输入安全验证答案,可是这个我在注册的时 候已经忘记了,这个怎么办,我急得需要买东西。我在你们网站上没有找到修改安全问题验证的入口。求助。

    that page has changed, I can't find the entrance to modify the secure password authentication
    I tried

  • HFM Security Issue - User can submit a journal by by-passing the approval step even though they are not an admin.

    Hi All,
    I was wondering if anyone could help me with a HFM security issue on HFM 11.1.2.3 we are facing please?
    The problem is that a user can by-pass the journal approval stage and post directly after submitting if Custom4 access control=All is selected.
    If any of the other access controls (None, Read, Promote) for custom 4 are selected, the first two steps of the process are possible -
    input and approval of the journal are possible but final posting of the journal is not and returns an error that says:
    "User does not have the access right to perform this journal task"
    The options I have thought for a workaround are as follows:
    1.       1. Set up a 3rd user called data poster and remove submit journal role from user 1 (data inputter)
    2.       2. Put in place process control and use the various review levels (could be quite time consuming given there is no time left for development)
    Have anyone experienced this before and come up with a quick way of resolving this please? It would be very much appreciated.
    We have two types of users who are associated with groups in HFM and have the appropriate roles assigned to them to complete their tasks,
    they are:
    1. A data Inputter (who inputs base data and journals, who has access to create and submit journals)
    2.   2. A data reviewer (who approves journals)
    The process is as follows:
    1.       1. Logon as Data inputter to submit the journals
    2.       2. Logon as Data reviewer to approve the journals
    3.       3. Logon as Data inputter to post the Journals
    We are using the custom 4 member to identify different adjustment types. At the moment we are able to set it up in such a way whereby Steps 1 and 2 can be completed
    but once it comes back to step 3, we get an error as follows:
    "User does not have the access right to perform this journal task"
    (This error comes about when the access control on custom 4 is set to None, Read, Promote)
    Custom 4 Access Rights looks as follows:
    C4_ADJ01
    C4_ADJ02
    C4_ADJ03
    C4_ADJ04
    HFMDefault
    Read
    Read
    Read
    Read
    HFMLoad
    All
    Promote
    None
    Read
    HFMReview
    Read
    All
    All
    All
    When Custom 4=C4_ADJ01 all 3 steps can be completed but it by-passes step 2 (journal approval).
    For all other Custom 4 we complete steps 1 and 2 successfully but not step 3 due to access issues.
    Roles for the groups that users assigned look like the following:
    Test User Name
    Test User Name
    Access Rights
    1
    Base Data input/Journal Data input
    test_HFMLoad
    Reviewer 1
    Review Supervisor
    Create Journals
    Read Journals
    Database Management
    Enable write back in Web Grid
    Load Excel Data
    Generate Recurring
    Post Journals
    Create Unbalanced Journals
    Manage Templates
    Data Form Write Back from Excel
    Consolidate
    2
    Data Reviewer
    test_HFMReview
    Reviewer 1
    Review Supervisor
    Create Journals
    Read Journals
    Database Management
    Approve Journals
    Consolidate
    Reviewer 2
    Generate Recurring
    Manage Templates
    Create Unbalanced Journals
    Any help or advice would be much appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    M.

    Hi All,
    I was wondering if anyone could help me with a HFM security issue on HFM 11.1.2.3 we are facing please?
    The problem is that a user can by-pass the journal approval stage and post directly after submitting if Custom4 access control=All is selected.
    If any of the other access controls (None, Read, Promote) for custom 4 are selected, the first two steps of the process are possible -
    input and approval of the journal are possible but final posting of the journal is not and returns an error that says:
    "User does not have the access right to perform this journal task"
    The options I have thought for a workaround are as follows:
    1.       1. Set up a 3rd user called data poster and remove submit journal role from user 1 (data inputter)
    2.       2. Put in place process control and use the various review levels (could be quite time consuming given there is no time left for development)
    Have anyone experienced this before and come up with a quick way of resolving this please? It would be very much appreciated.
    We have two types of users who are associated with groups in HFM and have the appropriate roles assigned to them to complete their tasks,
    they are:
    1. A data Inputter (who inputs base data and journals, who has access to create and submit journals)
    2.   2. A data reviewer (who approves journals)
    The process is as follows:
    1.       1. Logon as Data inputter to submit the journals
    2.       2. Logon as Data reviewer to approve the journals
    3.       3. Logon as Data inputter to post the Journals
    We are using the custom 4 member to identify different adjustment types. At the moment we are able to set it up in such a way whereby Steps 1 and 2 can be completed
    but once it comes back to step 3, we get an error as follows:
    "User does not have the access right to perform this journal task"
    (This error comes about when the access control on custom 4 is set to None, Read, Promote)
    Custom 4 Access Rights looks as follows:
    C4_ADJ01
    C4_ADJ02
    C4_ADJ03
    C4_ADJ04
    HFMDefault
    Read
    Read
    Read
    Read
    HFMLoad
    All
    Promote
    None
    Read
    HFMReview
    Read
    All
    All
    All
    When Custom 4=C4_ADJ01 all 3 steps can be completed but it by-passes step 2 (journal approval).
    For all other Custom 4 we complete steps 1 and 2 successfully but not step 3 due to access issues.
    Roles for the groups that users assigned look like the following:
    Test User Name
    Test User Name
    Access Rights
    1
    Base Data input/Journal Data input
    test_HFMLoad
    Reviewer 1
    Review Supervisor
    Create Journals
    Read Journals
    Database Management
    Enable write back in Web Grid
    Load Excel Data
    Generate Recurring
    Post Journals
    Create Unbalanced Journals
    Manage Templates
    Data Form Write Back from Excel
    Consolidate
    2
    Data Reviewer
    test_HFMReview
    Reviewer 1
    Review Supervisor
    Create Journals
    Read Journals
    Database Management
    Approve Journals
    Consolidate
    Reviewer 2
    Generate Recurring
    Manage Templates
    Create Unbalanced Journals
    Any help or advice would be much appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    M.

  • Secure Zone login form logs user in who isn't registered for it?!

    I have a client who runs an eCommerce site through BC.  We have a secure zone setup for his site and he wants to review and approve users before they are given access.  There is good reason for this so please don't bring up counter-points as it is non-negotiable.
    Anyway, the secure zone registration form basicly creates a user CRM record and allows them to select a username and password.  I've instructed to client to continue into the CRM and select the checkbox next to the appropriate secure zone in order to authorize the account to login.  As far as we know this has been working until yesterday.  Now, when somebody who has an account but it is not approved yet tries to login, they receive the form error as to be expected.  However they get logged into some phantom secure zone.
    I say "phantom" zone because the actual registration form doesn't subscribe them to a secure zone, it's manual (as previously stated).  This is a pretty big issue as a major reason for doing this is that my client doesn't want his prices visible to the public.  Only after the person is in the secure zone are prices visible.  Any help would be much appreciated.  I know BC launched a new update recently which my be a contributing factor....thanks in advance!

    Hi Mike,
    This has always been the case.
    IF you have a username and password and login to a site you are logged in. You may very well not be part of a securezone but you are logged in. This is why hiding and showing content soley based on the isloggedin module is a very thoughtful process as you can not show content based on this knowledge.
    This has nothing to do with the update, you probably only just noticed this behavior but this has been the case since BC born.

  • Security issues in Mavericks 9.04

    I just had a secure scan done on my Mavericks server. The main issues seem to be:
    OpenSSL Running Version Prior to 0.9.8za Upgrade to OpenSSL version 0.9.8za or newer.
    Apache mod_negotiation Multi-Line Filename Upload Vulnerabilities (Upgrade to Apache version 2.3.2 or newer.)
    Given that upgrading these would mean compiling and installing Apache and OpenSSL(which I'm not really keen to do) I'm wondering what experienced admins think of these threats.

    pkmusic wrote:
    Dumb question - so a self-signed SSL cert doesn't use Open SSL?
    Certificates are used with ssh and SSL/TLS and such, yes.  Most of OS X uses Secure Transport for its certificate- and SSL/TLS-related processing, but Apache does not.  Apache is linked against OpenSSL.
    Self-signed certificates lead to a different security issue.  
    An HTTPS site with a self-signed certificate will be considered untrusted by accessing web clients and the web browser will usually issue diagnostics before allowing access to the site or a diagnostic before marking the certificate as trusted, or that you've set up your own certificate chain and installed your own root certificate.  That you're asking this question implies the former; that you're not really running HTTPS with a trusted certificate chain.   Which generally means you can just shut off SSL/TLS.
    As for the original question, here's how the scanner is likely detecting the down-revision versions — if you look at the server details being returned to the client, you'll see some information on Apache and OpenSSL versions embedded in the response:
    $ telnet foo.example.com 80
    Trying 10.1.3.1...
    Connected to foo.example.com
    Escape character is '^]'.
    HEAD / HTTP/1.0
    HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
    Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 14:40:11 GMT
    Server: Apache/2.2.26 (Unix) PHP/5.4.24 mod_ssl/2.2.26 OpenSSL/0.9.8y DAV/2
    Location: http://foo.example.com/
    Cache-Control: max-age=1209600
    Expires: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 14:40:11 GMT
    Connection: close
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
    Connection closed by foreign host.
    $
    That won't get fixed without replacing Apache et al or one of the other options, as described in my earlier reply.
    For completeness, some folks will manually configure the server to not return these details.  That'll derail the the vulnerability scanner, certainly.  It might not have the intended result, too, as the remote attackers can simply decide to throw every attack they have at your server — the attackers are not short on CPU cycles and network bandwidth, after all; unintended consequences.
    As for using a self-signed cert and given you probably aren't providing file-level access to other folks, I'd not (personally) be particularly concerned about that vulnerability scan — one of the limitations with using vulnerability scanners is that you then have to go off and figure out if you're actually vulnerable to whatever the scanner is reporting.  It's an issue certainly, but then you'll have to decide if your backups are complete and current and with copies kept off-site, and if your other security practices and password policies and such are also all up to date and secure, and at what else you might risk if the server is breached — if configuring a DMZ for your server might be appropriate, for instance, to isolate the server from the rest of your network should the server be breached.

  • Security issues with connecting pdf to database

    I have a pdf form that is being called from a webform as part
    of a web application. The PDF has two dropdown lists that I was
    populating from a SQL Server Database. I had created a special user
    that had select access only to the tables for the dropdowns.
    My question is are there any known security issues with
    regard to allowing a pdf to connect to a database this way. The PDF
    is being called from a secure connection but I don't know if
    opening this database connection to populate these dropdowns
    exposes a security hole of any sort. If it does, do you have a
    solution to make this secure? I am asking because another developer
    on the project brought up the issue of this design creating a
    security risk and I haven't been able to find anything online
    discussing it either way.
    Thanks!
    Maureen

    Hello Maureen,
    Thanks for posting, but I'm not sure I see if your question
    relates to Acrobat.com
    Are you using any of the Acrobat.com Services as any part of
    your workflow?
    Thanks!
    Pete

  • Security issue with a website and java

    I am having trouble getting Java to work on a website, the message tells me that I have a security issue  but I don't know how to fix it??

    The site may be sending Firefox for Android a page that is not correctly formed.
    We have a feature in Firefox 39 which will allow the request desktop site menu item to show the full desktop site.

  • Security Issue - LDAP Authentication and supply of empty passwords

    Security Issue with OC4J and JAZN LDAP Realm
    Product Versions:
    OC4J 9.0.3
    Infrastructure 9.0.2.1
    When using form based authentication or basic authentication in a WebApp, OC4J authenticates any existing user that as a password defined with an empty password.
    Example: If you have a user with the username "user" and password "password". In the login of the WebApp if you supply only the username, OC4J authenticates the user.
    Notes:
    - If we supply a wrong password we are not authenticated
    - If we supply the correct password we are authenticated.
    To reproduce the problem, I have used Oracle callerInfo jazdemo, configured to used the JAZN LDAP Realm named sample_subrealm, that is installed with 9ias infrastructure
    Notes: If I use JAZN XML Realm everything works as expected.
    Bruno Antunes
    Java Software Engineer

    Jeremy - You'd have to use database authentication to achieve that. Create a DAD without specifying a username/password and change the app's current authentication scheme to DATABASE. Then users can login using their database account credentials. LDAP won't be used when you do this so you'll have to keep the database account passwords in sync with LDAP somehow if that's important.
    Scott

  • Can not view slidshows or creat a book on Snapfish.  SF IT folks say it's a security issue on my end.  Any ideas?

    Can not view slidshows or creat a book on Snapfish.  SF IT folks say it's a security issue on my end.  Any ideas?

    You will need to contact Snapfish to find out their system requirements and which plugin you need
    - http://support.snapfish.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/669/brand/3

  • I updated some security issues and suddenlly my gmail does not open. it shows 75% of the procees and does not go on

    I updated automatically some security issues in my computer (I don't remember which) and now my gmail will start opening until it reaches 75% and it will not go on opening.
    I can open it Internet explorer but not in Mozila fireworks

    Clear the cache and the cookies from sites that cause problems.
    "Clear the Cache":
    *Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Cached Web Content: "Clear Now"
    "Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
    *Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"
    Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
    *Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

  • Report for issuing C-Form to vendor

    Hi,
    Report for issuing C-Form to vendor regarding invoice booked against PO.
    Help me out in the above issue.
    Regards,
    R.K

    Hi Anjireddy,
    can you let me the path or T.code for the standrad C-Form and what is the process we has to follow for C-Form for vendor.
    Regards,
    R.K

  • Issue with form based Authentication in three tier sharepoint 2013 environment.

    Hi,
    We are facing issue with form based Authentication in three tier environment.
    We are able to add users to the database and in SharePoint.
    But we are not able to login with created users.
    In single tier everything working fine
    Please help , Its urgent ... Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Hari
    Regards, Hari

    if the environments match, then it sounds like a kerberos double-hop issue
    Scott Brickey
    MCTS, MCPD, MCITP
    www.sbrickey.com
    Strategic Data Systems - for all your SharePoint needs

  • Other web browsers and security issues?

    Since even an Apple KB article recognizes the need for an additional browser and because of Safari's limitations and problems, I'm going to try switching to another browser (most likely OmniWeb and am looking at Firefox, Shira and Opera also though perhaps not as a primary browser) but I'm wondering about their ability to keep on top of any security issues for Mac? (and how do you keep up with security updates?)
    Though perhaps unfounded, at least with Safari, I feel that Apple has a vested interest in keeping on top of security issues (for Safari and Java) and I can readily find out about security updates via software updater.

    Most of the other Mac browsers have their adherents. They are all good browsers (I have 7 browsers installed to test various web sites and for change-of-pace usage). They all have their strengths and they all have their weaknesses. Only iCab and OmniWeb are still shareware, the rest are now or always have been free (Opera just recently stopped charging for its browser).
    I have settled on Firefox as my alternate browser and I use it maybe just a tad more than Safari, but I do switch back and forth between them. The Mozilla foundation is good at getting security updates out when needed. Firefox has a button on the toolbar to check for updates. One nice thing about Firefox is that you can install free extensions which enhance the features available. I have one to supplement tab features, one to control iTunes from Firefox's status bar, one to help me format messages in discussion forums, and one to block ads.
    I prefer OmniWeb for doing intensive research because of the way it handles tabs in its sidebar, showing me which ones I've looked at and which ones I haven't, and giving me great flexibility in rearranging tabs, which are viewable as thumbnails or text names (I have had up to a hundred or so tabs open in OmniWeb.
    Shiira is good and its fast. I have not checked for updates for a while, but the last time I updated there was still a problem with Shiira kicking you out of logged-in sites when you moved from page to page with in web site. This may have been fixed by now - they were aware of the problem back then.
    Camino is a native OS X cousin of Firefox and is also fast, but is not updated as often.
    I would stay away from Mozilla or Netscape unless you need all the additional modules they have and which take up hard disk space. Firefox and Camino represent the browser module of Mozilla/Netscape. Mozilla and Netscape have modules for email, irc chat, newsgroups, and for creating and editing web pages. Netscape is a branded and slightly customized version of Mozilla and is not updated as often.
    Opera is a nice browser and some use it as their main browser, but I have not seen anything that really stands out for me, but that does not mean it is not worth a look.
    I would stay away from abandonware Internet Explorer.
    As for checking for updates, several of them, as with many Mac programs, now have a menu item that allows you to check for updates. Most of them also announce their updates on both VersionTracker and MacUpdate.
    Happy Exploring.

  • Security Issue with Apple ID

    Today while using my iphone and trying to use facetime for the first time since updating to IOS6, my phone asked me if I wanted to use some email address that I do not have for facetime. What? The message pretty much said that this email address was linked to my apple ID. So I got to work logged into AppleID.Apple.com and saw the email address verified and also saw it displayed as an alternate apple id. Immediately, I changed my Apple ID password and called apple at 1800myapple since that is the number on the website and try to talk to someone that could assist me with this severe issue. Anyway, my iphone went dead and the people on the phone couldn't connect me to anyone because I couldn't give them a serial number to an apple device. I tried to explain to the technicians that this is a problem with my ID and that the alternate ID has access to everything that my Apple ID has access to. Both times the call went nowhere. This is ridiculous. Why can't I talk to a security team? Why is the technician telling me that I can manage my ID from the website, when I know that I am looking at the website and I cannot remove the alternate ID? How did this ID get associated with my account and why did I never receive an email informing me of the change?
    Since Apple has other services and not just products STOP ASKING FOR A SERIAL NUMBER AND ASSIST THE CUSTOMER WITH THE ISSUE especially since it is a SECURITY ISSUE.

    oh man, I know exactly what you're talking about. i have a relatively easy to guess apple id email and everybody in the world thinks it's theirs... but once I turned on two-step authentication, the emails stopped completely.  here's a faq about it:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5570
    once i turned that on, whenever they'd want to reset my password, they would get asked for my recovery key, which they don't have, haha!  victory is mine.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Music on iPod to iTunes?

    I feel really stupid asking this but, is it possible to move music from an iPod onto iTunes? The reason I'm asking this is because my Aunt has a Fifth Generation iPod and she asked me to put a few episodes of lost (Downloaded with iTunes) onto her iP

  • My samsung galaxy s4 is taking forever to optimize/ tune up

    Any ideas on how to fix my phone because its taking forever to optimize/tune up. Please help

  • Lenovo Q180

    I have bought recently the Lenovo Q180 and i have a strange issue with displaying picture over HDMI port. I'm having windows 7 installed on it and from time to time looks like my Lenovo is loosing picture on hdmi and tv shows the black screen, and af

  • Time Machine incorrectly reporting free space

    I'm seeing this on Mavericks (retina MBP, 500GB SSD about 60% utilized) . I've got a AFP network share that I copied a clean 800GB sparesebundle to. I use Disk Utility to mount and verify it, and it says, 650MB used, which means it's essentially 99%

  • Poor sound quality and distortion

    Ever since getting my 27" Imac I've notice the sound quality is poor and bass sounds distort quite a bit and it happens with the computer's speaker, headphones, and streamed audio over the network. Any ideas on what might be causing this? Sound card