Seeking clarification in IPv6 Link & Site local addresses please

Hi All
Just wondering if anybody with IPv6 knowledge can put me straight. I am currently studying for my CCNP (BSCI) and am just going over the IPv6 stuff again.
Now I understand that for the CCNP I will likely just need to know the basic theory of IPv6, however I cannot get my head around the Link-Local and Site-Local addresses.
Routing TCP/IP Vol 1 (Jeff Doyle) 2nd edition, page 54, has a table showing the high order bits of various IPv6 addresses and lists the following.
Link-Local = 1111 1110 10 which equates to FE80::/10
Site-Local = 1111 1110 11 which equates to FEC0::/10
Now the part I can not get my head around is this.
The first 10 high order bits equate to 2 1/2 (10 bits) nibbles, but for the Link-Local address to be FE80 would require 4 nibbles (16 bits) or
1111 1110 1000 0000. Like wise with the Site-Local address of FEC0 which would be 1111 1110 1100 0000. This would mean that the prefix should be /16 if remaining 6 bits can not be turned on.
So I am trying to understand what happens to the remaining 6 bits in these Local IPv6 addresses or to the IPv6 addresses from FE81 to FEBF and from FEC1 to FECF? Are they just ignored?
If so it would appear that nothing was learned from what happened with the initial wasteful assignment of IPv4 addresses!!
Can anybody put me out of my misery please :)
Best Regards,
Michael

Hi Narayan
Thank you for your post and the information contained within.
When I went through IPv6 initially for my CCNP (BSCI) studies I understood that as the Link-Local and Site-Local addresses had a prefix of /10. I thought that once I kept the initial 10 bits of the address as specified in the RFC, I could change any and all of the other 118 bits in the address.
However my study material (which now also includes "Routing TCP/IP Vol 1&2, by Jeff Doyle) also states that Link-Local addresses will always start with "FE80" and Site-Local addresses will always start with "FEC0". This accounts for the first 16 bits, which to me (as just a CCNA with knowledge of IPv4 only) meant that the Link-Local and Site-Local addresses should actually have a prefix of /16.
After further investigation into IPv6 I am further confused as it appears that the Link and Site local addresses are derived by using the 48 bit MAC address of an interface, injecting "FFFE" between the OUI portion and the local portion and then inverting the 7th bit to reach the modified EUI-64 identifier.
This in turn means that the Link and Site Local addresses would have a prefix of /64, as the actual addresses would start off with
FE80:0000:0000:0000: or FE80::
FEC0:0000:0000:0000: or FEC0::.
Also while searching the web for more information I came across this site
http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_IPv6SpecialAddressesReservedPrivateLinkLocalSiteLo-3.htm
which suggests as you mentioned above that all addresses between FE80:: and FEBF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF can be Link-Local addresses and that all addresses between FEC0:: and FEFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF can be Site-Local addresses.
I then read through RFC3513 (IPv6 Addressing Architecture) http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3513.html and can find no mention of these "ranges" for the Link-Local and Site-Local addresses. It seems to suggest in section 2.5.6 (and I am no expert at reading and understanding RFC's) the the Link-Local address has the first 10 bits of "1111111010" the next 54 bits set to "0" and the final 64 bits are the interface ID (modified EUI-64 ID). Again to me this suggests that the prefix should be /64
However with the Site-Local address the first 10 bits are "1111111011" the next 54 bits are the "Subnet ID" and the final 64 bits are the interface ID (Modified EUI-64 ID) which again suggests to me a prefix of /64, but also that I can manipulate the middle 54 bits.
I think the more I try to understand this the more I confuse myself. I know this is probably gone way outside what I am expected to know for my BSCI exam, but I just like to understand how things that I read in my studies are arrived at. I don't like just taking things on blind faith :)
However I think after reading the RFC that I am also getting to hung up on the fact that the texts I am reading use a /10 prefix for these addresses. I understand the the Link-Local addresses are like the addresses Microsoft OS's use when they cannot get a DHCP addresses (169.254/16) and that Site-Local addresses are equivalent to RFC1918 private addresses.
Therefore I can except that the Link-local addresses will always start FE80:0000:0000:0000: and I am assuming that the lowest Site-Local address will start with FEC0:0000:0000:0000 but can be anything up to FEFF:FFFF:FFFF:FFFF, which will define the subnet.
Sorry for such a long post, but I see now why network administrators are not rushing to implement IPv6 :) I think it will take time to get my head around this.
Again thank you for your input.
Best Regards and Best Wishes for the 2008 and beyond,
Michael

Similar Messages

  • DFSDiag TestDCs Warning - Site Association by IPv6 Link Local Addresses?!?

    Why is DFSDiag
    using IPv6 Link Local Addresses (fe80::/64) for /TestDCs Site Association test?
    C:\Users\Administrator\Documents>dfsdiag /testdcs
    DFSDIAG_INFO - APPL - Client Domain found to be BRREX.
    Starting TestDcs ....
    Validating DFS Service ....
    Validating DFS Service on FINCH.
    DFSDIAG_INFO - APPL - DFS Service on FINCH is OK.
    Validating SiteCostedReferrals Key ....
    Validating SiteCostedReferrals in FINCH.
    DFSDIAG_INFO - APPL - SYSVOL/NETLOGON referrals are site costed.
    Validating Registry Entries ....
    BRREX has a single domain controller.
    Validating SiteAssociation ....
    Validating SiteAssociation of FINCH in every DC.
    DFSDIAG_WARNING - APPL - SiteName from IP - fe80::a402:d343:baa3:5f5e%12 of FINCH in DC - FINCH is NULL while in ADSite it is GoGrid,
    this can lead to different referral ordering.
    DFSDIAG_WARNING - APPL - SiteName from IP - fe80::7473:f9f8:c5c3:17e6%13 of FINCH in DC - FINCH is NULL while in ADSite it is GoGrid,
    this can lead to different referral ordering.
    Finished TestDcs.
    C:\Users\Administrator\Documents>
    DFSDiag problems with IPv6 Link Local addresses has occurred
    three (3) other times.
    My best guess is either AD DS or DFS don't like running on server routing IPv6 via
    6in4 tunnel.
    IPCONFIG follows:
    Windows IP Configuration
    Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : finch
    Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : brrex.com
    Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
    IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
    WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
    DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : brrex.com
    grid-store.brrex.com
    grid-node.brrex.com
    Ethernet adapter Private:
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : grid-store.brrex.com
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : SUSE Network Driver for Windows #2
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-16-6E-00-0B-1E
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    IPv6 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 2001:470:841e:1::100(Preferred)
    Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::a402:d343:baa3:5f5e%12(Preferred)
    IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.113.0.40(Preferred)
    Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
    Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
    DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 2001:470:841e:1::100
    ::1
    10.113.0.40
    127.0.0.1
    NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled
    Ethernet adapter Public:
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : grid-node.brrex.com
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : SUSE Network Driver for Windows
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-16-6E-00-0B-1D
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 173.1.67.212(Preferred)
    Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.240
    Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 173.1.67.209
    DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 173.1.67.212
    127.0.0.1
    NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled
    Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 9:
    Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 02-00-54-55-4E-01
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Tunnel adapter IP6Tunnel:
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : grid-node.brrex.com
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft Direct Point-to-point Adapater
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    IPv6 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 2001:470:1f04:53f::2(Preferred)
    Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::7473:f9f8:c5c3:17e6%13(Preferred)
    Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 2001:470:1f04:53f::1
    DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 173.1.67.212
    127.0.0.1
    NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled
    Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 12:
    Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : grid-node.brrex.com
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : isatap.grid-node.brrex.com
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 13:
    Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : grid-store.brrex.com
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : isatap.grid-store.brrex.com
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    ROUTE PRINT follows:
    ===========================================================================
    Interface List
    12 ...00 16 6e 00 0b 1e ...... SUSE Network Driver for Windows #2
    11 ...00 16 6e 00 0b 1d ...... SUSE Network Driver for Windows
    1 ........................... Software Loopback Interface 1
    10 ...02 00 54 55 4e 01 ...... Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
    13 ...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 Microsoft Direct Point-to-point Adapater
    14 ...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 isatap.grid-node.brrex.com
    15 ...00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 isatap.grid-store.brrex.com
    ===========================================================================
    IPv4 Route Table
    ===========================================================================
    Active Routes:
    Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
    0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 173.1.67.209 173.1.67.212 266
    10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.113.0.1 10.113.0.40 11
    10.113.0.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.113.0.40 266
    10.113.0.40 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.113.0.40 266
    10.113.0.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.113.0.40 266
    127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
    127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
    127.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
    173.1.67.208 255.255.255.240 On-link 173.1.67.212 266
    173.1.67.212 255.255.255.255 On-link 173.1.67.212 266
    173.1.67.223 255.255.255.255 On-link 173.1.67.212 266
    224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
    224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 10.113.0.40 266
    224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 On-link 173.1.67.212 266
    255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
    255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.113.0.40 266
    255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 On-link 173.1.67.212 266
    ===========================================================================
    Persistent Routes:
    Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Metric
    10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.113.0.1 1
    0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 173.1.67.209 Default
    ===========================================================================
    IPv6 Route Table
    ===========================================================================
    Active Routes:
    If Metric Network Destination Gateway
    13 266 ::/0 2001:470:1f04:53f::1
    1 306 ::1/128 On-link
    13 266 2001:470:1f04:53f::/64 On-link
    13 266 2001:470:1f04:53f::2/128 On-link
    12 266 2001:470:841e:1::/64 On-link
    12 266 2001:470:841e:1::100/128 On-link
    13 266 fe80::/64 On-link
    12 266 fe80::/64 On-link
    13 266 fe80::7473:f9f8:c5c3:17e6/128
    On-link
    12 266 fe80::a402:d343:baa3:5f5e/128
    On-link
    1 306 ff00::/8 On-link
    13 266 ff00::/8 On-link
    12 266 ff00::/8 On-link
    ===========================================================================
    Persistent Routes:
    If Metric Network Destination Gateway
    0 4294967295 ::/0 2001:470:1f04:53f::1
    ===========================================================================
    Thanks in advance!

    Did you solve this? I'm having the same problem.

  • Getting error while accessing a webpage by using link local address of ipv6

    Hello,
    I want to access my login.jsp by using ipv6 address.
    when i am accessing my web page by using loop back or localhost6(like the following) it is working.
    http://[::1]:8080/test/login.jsp //for loopback
    http://localhost6:8080/test/login.jsp
    But when i am accessing my webpage by using link local address as following i am not getting my web page.
    http://[fe80::201:6cff:fe0f:d7ae%eth0]:8080/test
    or
    http://[fe80::201:6cff:fe0f:d7ae]:8080/test
    For the above case is there any solutions????

    Whatever i have mentioned these are correct. My ipv6 address is also correct.From browser only i am accessing.>
    Not a Java issue, then. Your problem I'm afraid.
    But how do you know they're correct? Given that one of them isn't working, I'd triple check it if I were you.

  • IPv6 Link-local addresses: EUI-64 or Static?

    Hello Everyone.
    What is the best practice? Configuring a static link-local address on the interface, or letting the router pick an eui-64 one?
    From a dynamic routing process point of view, does it really matter which type of link local address is used in a production network?
    I know that static addresses are more convinient for humans. But what about the IOS?
    Any other considerations?
    Thank you all.

    Hello,
    I would say that as you already know when you use a routing protocol on IPv6 the neighbor will always be the link local address from the interface from the neighbor itself,
    So I would say why to use Dynamic( Cause it's easy,it's scalable as it's based on a unique value)
    Why to use Static ( So you can create your own system to identify the neighbor, I have read that for security purposes you can use a mechanism that will create random EUI-64 based on a hash but as this is only for Link-Local address I would say it does not apply here)
    Regards

  • Why use link-local addressing for HSRP in IPv6?

    I have scoured the internet for an answer to this question, and am no closer to having it answered.  Am hoping someone here can help!
    * Why do we use link-local (or autoconfig) addresses for the standby IP in FHRPs?  If you are forwarding a packet towards a link-local destination address, wouldn't the source address then have to be a link-local address from the same prefix, which according to scope, should not route beyond the local link?  How do you route an IP packet that has a link-local address for a source address?
    Any insight would be much appreciated.
    Thank you in advance.

    Dougles,
    next hop is used for reaching "gateway" that know where to send packets farther (read it as "next hop to the destination")... routing in IPvX is hopping between nodes where every hop is closer to destination... This is theory behind.
    So as machine that needs to send packet to "not directly connected destination" you only need to send packet to gateway leading to this destination...
    so you need to send packet so, that "gateway" will recieve this packet and gateway then send this packet farther... it is not important what IP address this gateway has.
    On ethernet you only need to know MAC address of this gateway and you send packet (with your source IPv6 address and intended destination IPv6 address) encapsulated with "destination MAC address" of gateway. When gateway recieve ethernet frame, and this frame is for it (destination MAC address is its MAC address), the gateway will proceed IP header (inside IP header the gateway see IT is not final destination for this packet, and gateway will route this packet).
    So configuring IP address as next hop is just "hleper for simpler administration".. MAC address of gateway is important. In IPv4 address resolution protocol (ARP) is used to automaticly get MAC address of gateway if you configure next hop as IP address. In IPv6 there is neighbor discovery protocol(ND) used for this task.
    conclusion: you can use link local address as nex hop address for addresses from any scope ... next hop is just next hop, it is not used just for the same scope communication.
    And question is... if we need just information about MAC address of gateway, why to ask using global address?
    We need to get MAC address... that is information important just "locally"... so to ask for local information, why not use link local address ?
    HSRP is the same case... really just need MAC address to send packets correctly.

  • It is possible ssh from a router to another, to its ipv6 link-local address?

    Hi 
    R1 and R2 are connected by serial links, with IPV6 address global unicast and link-local every link.
    I can do ping between them. When I do ping to link-local address next router, I need to specify outgoing interface, ping is succesful.
    However I can not do SSH v2 from a router to another to its link-local address. 
    OS R1 and R2: c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-1.M4.bin 
    R1
    Serial0/3/0                [up/up]
        FE80::1
        2001:1200:CAFE:BEBA::1
    R2
    Serial0/3/0                [up/up]
        FE80::2
        2001:1200:CAFE:BEBA::2
    Thank you

    Hi Cesar, 
    you should be able to use "%source_itf" at the end of the target IPv6 LL address. 
    Example with telnet : 
    R1#ping FE80::302              
    Output Interface: Ethernet0/0                 
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to FE80::302, timeout is 2 seconds:
    Packet sent with a source address of FE80::301%Ethernet0/0
    Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 0/0/1 ms
    R1#telnet FE80::302%Ethernet0/0
    Trying FE80::302 ... Open
    Password required, but none set
    [Connection to FE80::302%Ethernet0/0 closed by foreign host]
    R1#

  • SG300 cant change the Link Local address for an IPv6 interface

    There seems to be no apparent way to change the Link Local address for an IPv6 interface
    If I create more than one interface they all appear to have the same Link Local address

    Never mind, I figured it out
    By adding a Link Local address to an interface, it overides the existing one on the interface

  • IPv6 link-local address on point-to-point interface

    Hello,
    I'm a little bit confused. I know that there are two ways of assigning an IPv6 link-local address on interface. We can add it manually, or it is by default created automatically using modified EUI-64. But how is this address made when there is no MAC address on point-to-point link?
    Thanks.
    Martin

    Hello,
    sorry but I don't think that these reasons are reasonable. Why do they need to remember these addresses when are they used only on a link with internal processes? They cannot be used for management purposes, so I would say that it is easier for me to configure one loopback with global address at each router which would be easy to remember, announce it to IGP and it can be used for management, so as for BGP..and I don't need to care about all link local addresses I'm using in my network, which might contain hundreds of links..

  • Link Local Address on BGP

    I recently start to have IPv6 BGP Peer, at first I try to block all the link local address at my interface incoming ACL but after a while I notice that there has many match log on the deny link local address. I want to know is it a correct thing to not block link local address even the link is upstream link to my ISP?
    My IPv6 BGP is formed by using Global IPv6 address!

    Do you actually have a business need to block Link Local addresses ? This should not be done as the IPv6 control plane relies on link local addresses. e.g. each time you do a Neighbour Discovery on Ethernet. Link Local are also non routeable so they cannot traverse the router (assuming that is the intent of the ACL)
    I would recommend against blocking Link Local addresses in ACLs however if you must do this you should be selective about the ones you allow through. e.g.
    permit link_local_bgp_peer
    deny all link_local
    permit global uinicast
    Though just beware that even then, if the upstream link local address changes, as in the upstream router swaps or replaces its interface then the ACL will have no effect as the Link Local address would have changed.

  • I used to be able to copy or drag and drop links from the address window. Now with the update, only the address is copied or dragged not the link. (Says something about not giving site information). I want to be able to drag and drop or copy links.

    Question
    I used to be able to copy or drag and drop links from the address window. Now with the update, only the address is copied or dragged not the link. (Says something about not giving site information). I want to be able to drag and drop or copy links.

    To be more precise, you can setup a JComponent or JPanel on top of your JavaFX nodes that has a TransferHandler that can convert the (AWT/Swing) images dragged to the app to JavaFX image and then insert it into the underlying node.
    As for the file chooser itselft: ListView and the JavaFX composer can allow you to create one quite easily. TreeView can aslso be used to a lesser extend (still a big buggy). For both of these, there are small bugs in the Cell API that may (or may not) prevent from displaying a proper thumbnail in the cells.
    You can also use a regular JFileChooser if you do not mind the dialog box having a different LnF from the rest of your application.

  • Load Balacing on VPN3000 with non-local address pools

    Is it possible to load balance when the VPN3000 does not have an interface in the address pools, i.e. using "non-local" address pools as the documentation puts it? I know this works without clustering by setting static routes to the pool on the nearest router. But in a clustering setup it seems to me there is no way to assign a static route since there is no way to pre-determine which cluster member the client will connect to (an additional virtual address on the private network would solve this but I suppose it's too late to hope for new features!)

    20 flows and a bit better result:
    IOS-XR               Monitor Time: 00:00:08          SysUptime: 133:33:44
                         Last Clear:   00:00:06
    Protocol:General
    Interface             In(pps)      Out(pps)      InPkts/Delta   OutPkts/Delta
    Te0/1/0/0             11794         14977             0/44696         0/44484
    Te0/1/0/1             10682          8786             0/37924         0/25456
    Te0/1/0/2             18243         16958             0/44596         0/57579
    Quit='q',     Clear='c',    Freeze='f', Thaw='t',
    Next set='n', Prev set='p', Bytes='y',  Packets='k'
    (General='g', IPv4 Uni='4u', IPv4 Multi='4m', IPv6 Uni='6u', IPv6 Multi='6m')
    Can the ASR9K more or less normal balance on uneven number of links?

  • Acrobat 8.1- links to local files

    Hello,
    I'm having several MS-Word-files, which have to be converted to PDF. All files contain hyperlinks to web sites as well as links to files on our local file-server.
    Conversion works fine out of MS Word 2003, but links to local files do only work, if I open the created file on the file server. If I up load it to our web server and open it with a browser, the local files can not be found (links to Internet do work).
    If I edit the link properties within the created file by changing the performed action from 'open a file' to 'open a web link', starting the URL with 'file://...', the links work correct.
    Is there any possibility to tell Acrobat, that this has do be done while converting MS-Word-files?
    I even tried to change the absolute address within MS-Word, e.g. adding http:\\ to the link, but Word didn't allow this...

    Thank so much.
    But in other PCs the link works fine. It only happens in my Acrobat 9 Pro. In my mates PC the links works perfect.
    Any suggestions? Maybe this is a windows problem?
    Thanks!

  • Correct link to local folder in excel

    I have a datebase of materials in excel document with cells that have paths to folders where the materials are stored
    I want to link my local folders from my network to these certain cells in Excel so that my friends both from PC and Mac could quickly access them.
    Unfortunately, when I add folder address from my local network that starts from smb:// - the system doesn't understand that and turns it to local.
    What is the right thing to do?

    As far as I know it is not possible directly. I made a workaround though which implies making a webpage that does the trick (you'd need access to some webserver).
    Make a simple webpage, eg http://www.yourdomain.com/excel2path.htm with this source code:
    <html>
    <head>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
      var OpenPath=parent.location.search.substring(1) // retrieves smb-path from URL (all after the ?-mark)
      location.href=OpenPath
    </script>
    </head>
    <body>
    </body>
    </html>
    Then in excel the formula for the hyperlink should be something like:
    =HYPERLINK("http://www.yourdomain.com/excel2path.htm?smb://serverx/folderx/filex", "friendly name to click on")
    (with the CONCATENATE function you could dynamically build the smb-path)
    Done. If you now click on the hyperlink in excel, the webpage should load which takes the smb-path from the URL and automatically redirects to that path...

  • Exchange setup via local address

    Hi Folks
    Am trying to setup an iPad2 so that it connects to our exchange server locally via wifi. am trying to avoid it using proxy and external sites.
    Has anyone managed to set one up this way as im struggling to get the exchange account setup to work. I can use safari and connect to the local address fine though which is odd?
    thanks

    Thanks for the reply
    Its a wifi only model and its connecting to my windows 2008 r2 domain wireless network, we want to avoid using the proxy and letting the user have access to the web. Hence why were trying to configure it to use the local address for our exchange server. As i previously said, that address works via safari yet the mail exchange setup doesnt accept it.
    cheers

  • In google searches, selecting the advertised links do not load the page I have to copy the link into the address bar to load, how can this be fixed?

    Hi,
    When I select one of the advertised links in a google search, the tab flashes and looks likes it's loading but nothing happens. If I copy/paste the link into the address bar it works OK. It also works correctly using IE.

    Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode]] to check if one of the add-ons is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Tools > Add-ons > Themes).
    * Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
    See:
    * [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]]
    Do a malware check with some malware scanning programs.<br />
    You need to scan with all programs because each program detects different malware.<br />
    Make sure that you update each program to get the latest version of their databases before doing a scan.<br />
    * http://www.malwarebytes.org/mbam.php - Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware
    * http://www.superantispyware.com/ - SuperAntispyware
    * http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/defender/default.mspx - Windows Defender: Home Page
    * http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html - Spybot Search & Destroy
    * http://www.lavasoft.com/products/ad_aware_free.php - Ad-Aware Free
    See also:
    * "Spyware on Windows": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Popups_not_blocked
    * [[Searches are redirected to another site]]

Maybe you are looking for

  • Acrobat 9.5.1 forms wizard crashes acrobat

    Help! I tam trying to use forms wizard, and it crashes like a drunk freshmen driving a gocart backwards... Attached is the log. A ==================================================================== Process:         AdobeAcrobat [27881] Path:        

  • Thunderbolt cable

    Lost the audio to the tv from the cable overnight. There used to be a pause when you plugged in the cable then video and audio went to tv. now only the video is working. Repair guys say my air is fine and so is the cable. Any ideas

  • Alpha problem in Flash

    I lately generated a single color wireframe graphic in Illustrator, and saved this as .png format, set the background as transparent, I imported it into Flash library as graphic symbol, and drag it onto the stage, but the alpha channel was completely

  • HT203477 Hello:

    Dear Friends: I am using FCP 7 and Snow Leopard. Ever since I upgraded to Snow Leopard my system began to act funny crash periodically.  I have been crashing recently and my video card folks AJA tell me it looks like a memory issue (maloc) based on c

  • Cannot cancel print jobs from queue in Windows

    We have some print jobs we sent to the Bonjour printer when we were off network, they still show in the windows queue, but we cannot cancel them, any suggestions? Matt