Load Balacing on VPN3000 with non-local address pools

Question

Is it possible to load balance when the VPN3000 does not have an interface in the address pools, i.e. using "non-local" address pools as the documentation puts it? I know this works without clustering by setting static routes to the pool on the nearest router. But in a clustering setup it seems to me there is no way to assign a static route since there is no way to pre-determine which cluster member the client will connect to (an additional virtual address on the private network would solve this but I suppose it's too late to hope for new features!)

Answer 1

20 flows and a bit better result:
IOS-XR               Monitor Time: 00:00:08          SysUptime: 133:33:44
                     Last Clear:   00:00:06
Protocol:General
Interface             In(pps)      Out(pps)      InPkts/Delta   OutPkts/Delta
Te0/1/0/0             11794         14977             0/44696         0/44484
Te0/1/0/1             10682          8786             0/37924         0/25456
Te0/1/0/2             18243         16958             0/44596         0/57579
Quit='q',     Clear='c',    Freeze='f', Thaw='t',
Next set='n', Prev set='p', Bytes='y',  Packets='k'
(General='g', IPv4 Uni='4u', IPv4 Multi='4m', IPv6 Uni='6u', IPv6 Multi='6m')
Can the ASR9K more or less normal balance on uneven number of links?