SELECT COUNT(*)  bug

I have a table named comments, with a column labeled book_id. In this column I have non-unique integer values (we'll say 2 rows contain the number 9)
import flash.events.*;
import flash.data.*
import fl.controls.ComboBox;
import flash.filesystem.File
//Open database-------------------------------------------------------------
var conn:SQLConnection = new SQLConnection();
conn.addEventListener(SQLEvent.OPEN, openHandler);
var dbFile:File = File.desktopDirectory.resolvePath("tarot.db");
conn.openAsync(dbFile);
//authorsCB.addEventListener(Event.CHANGE, loadBooks);
function openHandler(event:SQLEvent):void
var selectStmt:SQLStatement = new SQLStatement();
selectStmt.sqlConnection = conn;
// define the SQL text
selectStmt.text = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM comments2 WHERE book_id = 9";
// register listeners for the result and failure (status) events
selectStmt.addEventListener(SQLEvent.RESULT, readResultHandler);
// execute the statement
selectStmt.execute();
// collect author data: author name and author ID. Populate authorCB with author name. authorID is used to match publications for the booksCB in the loadBooks() function
function readResultHandler(event:SQLEvent):void
var result:SQLResult = event.target.getResult();
var numResults:int = result.data.length;
for (var i:int = 0; i < numResults; i++)
var row:Object = result.data[i];
var bookID:uint = row.book_id;
var book:String = row.book;
var authorID:uint = row.author_id;
//combo box named authorsCB
authorsCB.addItem({label:bookID}); //assign table data to list box
addChild(authorsCB);
This code returns '0' even though my table contains two matching rows.
If I change my select statement to "SELECT * FROM comments WHERE book_id = 9", that works.
I'm trying to implement a query that will tell me if a particular value appears in this column. If that value appears in the table, then I want to run another query to extract the associated data.
Ultimately I'm loading combo box 1 with author names, and combo box 2 with book titles. I then want to run a 3rd query against my comments table. My comments table contains notes about the various books, but I don't have notes about every title, so I need to test if there are comments in the table before I try to extract those comments in order to avoid throwing an error.

Okay, I got it.
It's very difficult to find documentation on precisely HOW Adobe AIR implements some of the more obscure functions in SQLite. Even though SELECT COUNT(*) works in the Firefox SQLite Manager, it doesn't work the same way in AIR.
Through reviewing  the COUNT(*) function in "Learning SQL" by O'Reilly, there was an example utilized in which you point to the column you want counted BEFORE the COUNT(*) function.
So, it becomes:
SELECT columnName, COUNT(*)  someColumnName (optional) FROM someTable etc, etc.
After the FROM clause you could use a WHERE, or a GROUP BY.
Keep in mind that a GROUP clause runs after a WHERE clause.

Similar Messages

  • Select Count(*) from... returns zero, select * from... returns 4000 recs?

    Hi,
    I have an odd situation where "select count(*) from my_view where some_clause" returns 0, but the exact same query fetching the data (ie "select * from my_view where some_clause") works fine and fetches, correctly, 4000+ records.
    I have tried dropping and recreating the view, and collecting DB stats again, but the problem persists.
    I had a look at the explain plans and they are very different, but both the SQL statements work fine on a copy of the database taken with impdp.
    Does anyone have any suggestions on what might be going on here ?
    Any help would be appreciated, I've run out of ideas !
    Dave
    Edited by: user10281551 on 18-Sep-2008 00:43
    Edited by: user10281551 on 18-Sep-2008 00:44

    Maybe it's the bug that a function based index is present and gets incorrectly used in the select count(*) statement?
    If that's not the case, then please show us more details, like the statement and both execution plans.
    Regards,
    Rob.

  • 'select count(*) from x' returns 5460 rows and 'Select * from x' returns 0 rows

    As you can see in the next lines something is wrong in my Oracle (8.0.6 on Win NT 4.0 sp 6a) :
    Oracle8 Enterprise Edition Release 8.0.6.0.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning option
    PL/SQL Release 8.0.6.0.0 - Production
    SQLWKS> SELECT * FROM V_TERRA_TE;
    PERIOD_DATE PERIOD_TIME TERRARCV TERRASND TERCV TESND
    0 rows selected.
    SQLWKS> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM V_TERRA_TE;
    COUNT(*)
    5460
    1 row selected.
    V_TERRA_TE is a complex join of 5 Tables :
    CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW "ACTUATE".V_TERRA_TE AS Select to_date(to_char(p1.period_date,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYYMMDD') "PERIOD_DATE",
    to_date(to_char(p1.period_time,'HH24:MI'),'HH24:MI') "PERIOD_TIME",
    to_number(p1.caudalrcv + ((p3.caudalrcv + p4.caudalrcv)*(confterrate.conexadslterra/confterrate.conexadsltotal))) "TERRARCV",
    to_number(p1.caudalsnd + ((p3.caudalsnd + p4.caudalsnd)*(confterrate.conexadslterra/confterrate.conexadsltotal))) "TERRASND",
    to_number((p2.caudalrcv * confterrate.pctinfonegocio) + ((p3.caudalrcv + p4.caudalrcv)*(confterrate.conexadslte/confterrate.conexadsltotal)))"TERCV",
    to_number((p2.caudalsnd * confterrate.pctinfonegocio) + ((p3.caudalsnd + p4.caudalsnd)*(confterrate.conexadslte/confterrate.conexadsltotal)))"TESND"
    from p1,p2,p3,p4,confterrate
    where (p1.period_date=p2.period_date)and
    (p1.period_date=p3.period_date)and
    (p1.period_date=p4.period_date)and
    (p1.period_time=p3.period_time)and
    (p1.period_time=p4.period_time)and
    (p1.period_time=p2.period_time)and
    to_char(p1.period_date,'MMYYYY')=to_char(confterrate.period_datetime,'MMYYYY');
    I think that some not reported error happens in the select * with some temporary space or similar but only the message '0 rows selected' is displayed (instead the real error)
    Could somebody help me ?
    Thanks in advance
    Francisco

    Forcing the Join/sort to be made on Disk (not on memory) the problem not happens. This demostrate that ORACLE has a VERY IMPORTANT BUG : It returns 0 rows wich is false.
    To force it to work on disk i use this parameters :
    alter session set sort_area_size=0
    alter session set hash_join_enabled=false
    Note : probably is not the best combination or use of parameters, but using it the query works as espected.

  • Performance issue when using select count on large tables

    Hello Experts,
    I have a requirement where i need to get count of data  from a database table.Later on i need to display the count in ALV format.
    As per my requirement, I have to use this select count inside a nested loops.
    Below is the count snippet:
    LOOP at systems assigning <fs_sc_systems>.
    LOOP at date assigning <fs_sc_date>.
    SELECT COUNT( DISTINCT crmd_orderadm_i~header )
       FROM crmd_orderadm_i
       INNER JOIN bbp_pdigp
           ON crmd_orderadm_iclient EQ bbp_pdigpclient               "MANDT is referred as client
         AND crmd_orderadm_iguid  EQ bbp_pdigpguid
         INTO w_sc_count
    WHERE crmd_orderadm_i~created_at BETWEEN <fs_sc_date>-start_timestamp
         AND <fs_sc_date>-end_timestamp
         AND bbp_pdigp~zz_scsys   EQ <fs_sc_systems>-sys_name.
    endloop.
    endloop.
    In the above code snippet,
    <fs_sc_systems>-sys_name is having the system name,
    <fs_sc_date>-start_timestamp is having the start date of month
    and <fs_sc_date>-end_timestamp is the end date of month.
    Also the data in tables crmd_orderadm_i and bbp_pdigp is very large and it increases every day.
    Now,the above select query is taking a lot of time to give the count due to which i am facing performance issues.
    Can any one pls help me out to optimize this code.
    Thanks,
    Suman

    Hi Choudhary Suman ,
    Try this:
    SELECT crmd_orderadm_i~header
      INTO it_header                 " interna table
      FROM crmd_orderadm_i
    INNER JOIN bbp_pdigp
        ON crmd_orderadm_iclient EQ bbp_pdigpclient
       AND crmd_orderadm_iguid   EQ bbp_pdigpguid
       FOR ALL ENTRIES IN date
    WHERE crmd_orderadm_i~created_at BETWEEN date-start_timestamp
                                          AND date-end_timestamp
       AND bbp_pdigp~zz_scsys EQ date-sys_name.
        SORT it_header BY header.
        DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM it_header
        COMPARING header.
        describe table it_header lines v_lines.
    Hope this information is help to you.
    Regards,
    José

  • "select count(*)" and "select single *" returns different result

    Good day!
    product version SAP ECC 6.0
    oracle10
    data transfers from external oracle db into customer tables using direct oracle db link
    sometimes I get case with different results from 2 statements
    *mytable has 10 rows
    *1st statement
    data: cnt type I value 0.
    select count( * ) into cnt from mytable WHERE myfield_0 = 123 and myfield_1 = '123'.
    *cnt returns 10 - correct
    *2nd statement
    select single * from  mytable WHERE myfield_0 = 123 and myfield_1 = '123'.
    *sy-dbcnt returns 0
    *sy-subrc returns 4 - incorrect, 10 rows are "invisible"
    but
    1. se16 shows correct row number
    2. I update just one row from "invisible" rows using se16 and 2nd statement returns correct result after that
    can not understand why
    thank you in advance.

    Thank you, Vishal
    but,
    general problem is that
    1. both statements have the same WHERE conditions
    2. 1st return resultset with data (sy-dbcnt=10), 2nd return empty dataset, but must return 1 in sy-dbcnt
    Yes, different meaning, you are right, but must 2nd must return 1, because of "select single *" construction, not 0.
    Dataset to process is the same, WHERE conditions are equal...
    I think the problem is that how ABAP interperets select count(*) and "select single *".
    Maybe "select count (*)" scans only PK from index page(s)? and "select single *" scans data pages? and something is wrong with that?
    I'm new in SAP and didn't find any SAP tool to trace dump of data and indexes pages with Native SQL.
    se16 shows all records.
    And why after simple manual update of just one record using se16 "select single *" returns 1?
    I've just marked one row to update, didn't change any data, then pressed "save".

  • Select count from large fact tables with bitmap indexes on them

    Hi..
    I have several large fact tables with bitmap indexes on them, and when I do a select count from these tables, I get a different result than when I do a select count, column one from the table, group by column one. I don't have any null values in these columns. Is there a patch or a one-off that can rectify this.
    Thx

    You may have corruption in the index if the queries ...
    Select /*+ full(t) */ count(*) from my_table t
    ... and ...
    Select /*+ index_combine(t my_index) */ count(*) from my_table t;
    ... give different results.
    Look at metalink for patches, and in the meantime drop-and-recreate the indexes or make them unusable then rebuild them.

  • Select count(*) statement in ABAP

    Hi,
    Im writing following statement in my Function module,
    select count(*) into l_count
    from user_master
    where username = l_username and
          process_type = processtype and
          password = oldpassword.
    And there is one entry in table user_master.
    But still, I'm getting l_count as zero..
    Can somebody help me with this.
    Regards,
    Amey

    select count(*) into l_count
    from user_master
    where username = l_username and
    process_type = processtype and
    password = oldpassword.
    Use group by option...
    Like this....
    select count(*) into l_count
    from user_master
    where username = l_username and
    process_type = processtype and
    password = oldpassword group by username.

  • Select Count(*) from Sample_table - how to get the count using JDBC?

    Hi All,
    It would be glad if anyone could help me with this. The problem is that I have to get the 'count' of records selected from a arbitrary table say, 'sample_table'. Is that possible to form the SQL in JDBC as
    Select Count(*) from Sample_table
    and get the value of the count? If yes, how?
    Thanks in advance
    Prabz

    stmt = con.createStatement();
    ResultSet recordcnt_rs = stmt.executeQuery("Select Count (*) as record_ctr From Sample_table");
    recordcnt_rs.next();     
    record_ctr = recordcnt_rs.getInt("record_ctr");
    hope this helps.

  • Select count(*) for each row of a table

    Hello All,
    Following query gives a statistics for each user (how many items he owns, home many tickets authored, how many objects he is subscribed to etc...)
    select auser.userid,
    (select count(*) from item where owner like '%' || auser.id || '%') ITEM_OWNER_CNT,
    (select count(*) from tkt where originator = auser.id) TKT_ORIGINATE_CNT,
    (select count(*) from tkt where assigned_to = auser.id) TKT_QA_CNT,
    (select count(*) from tkt where create_user = auser.id) TKT_AUTHOR_CNT,
    (select count(*) from subscriptions where subscriber_id = auser.id) SUBSCRIPTION_CNT
    from
    user auser
    I was not happy with the performance of this query, so I tried the same using group by. The performance was even worse.
    Is there any other option for me to try? Please advice.
    Thanks,
    Sathish

    Hi, Sathish,
    As SBH said, a lot depends on your data. Please post some sample data (CREATE TABLE adn INSERT statemetns) for all tables, and the results you want from that data. Describe and give examples of any relationships that are not one-to-one..
    You probably want to do joings, like SBH suggested, rather than scalar sub-queries.
    The connection between the auser and item tables
    (select count(*) from item where owner like '%' || auser.id || '%') ITEM_OWNER_CNT,is very suspicious. Perhaps the item table is poorly designed, and the query would be faster if that table were changed. Is changing the design of the item table an option?
    You should be able to get all the information from the tkt table in one pass. It looks like you need to unpivot the data, so instead of one row per ticket (with 3 different people connected to it), there are 3 rows per ticket, each with only 1 person referenced. This is not necessarily a bad table design. Unpivoting, even more than most other things, depends on your database version, so you'll have to tell what version of Oracle you're using.

  • Why is the select Count too slow

    I am doing the following select count and calling it from my JSP to get the total number of records... why is it so slow...
    select count(*)
    from
    (select distinct o.receive_id, o.name, o.address
    from order o, item i
    where o.id = i.id
    and o.status = 2 and i.status = 0)

    If the data in the table that you are referring to in the query gets refreshed very often and your high water mark on your table not reset, then this query always runs longer. While deleting data in the table, use 'TRUNCATE' rather than 'DELETE' in your data queries. that would help reset the high water mark and your count() queries will run very very fast.

  • Select count * is not working

    Hi everybody.
    I've got a very strange problem, when i'm doing a select count* the result is giving me a value that is not the maximum (but when i check the database table the maximum value is another..)
    Could it be that the select command is not executing against the table, rather than the SAP cache??
    If this is the case, how can i avoid this?? I mean force the select command to execute against de DB table.
    thanks a lot.

    to get max value of a table u can use
    Select max( fld )............
    Bypassing the SAP buffer with the above additions is a means to increase the performance when accessing buffered database tables. To explicitly bypass the SAP buffer in the SELECT statement, always use the addition BYPASSING BUFFER instead of the implicit behavior of the additions stated above.

  • Select count(*) from table in oracle 11g with direct path read takes time

    select count(*) from table takes long time, even more than couple of hours..
    direct path read is the wait event which is almost is at 99%..
    can u someone provide some info on this.. on solution.. thankx

    knowledgespring wrote:
    table has millions of records... 130 millions..
    select count(*) from BIG_SIZE_TABLE; --- executed in sql plus command prompt.
    Rows     Execution Plan
    0  SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
    0   SORT (AGGREGATE)
    0    TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (FULL) OF 'BIG_SIZE_TABLE' (TABLE)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
    ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
    SQL*Net message to client                       1        0.00          0.00
    enq: KO - fast object checkpoint                1        0.01          0.01
    Disk file operations I/O                       18        0.00          0.00
    direct path read                            58921        0.34        418.54direct path read time waited is : 58921 total time waited: 418.54
    That 418 seconds - not the hours you reported earlier. Is it possible that your connection to the database broke ?
    On a typical system, by the way, you can usually turn one direct read for tablescan into 1MB, so your scan seems to have covered about 59 GB, which seems to be in the right sort of ballpark for 130M rows.
    we have another query and when we test the query execution using v$sql, is_bind_sensitive =N, how to make is_bind_sensitive=Y all the time.. There is a hint /*+ bind_aware */ - I'd have to check whether or not it's documented at present. It might help.
    I would be interested in hearing why you think the hint should be bind sensitive when the optimizer doesn't.
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis

  • SELECT COUNT( ) gives warning in ECC6.0.

    Hi,
    The following query is giving syntax error in ECC6.0, where as it worked absolutely fine in 3.1i server.
    SELECT COUNT( OBOX_CNTNO ) FROM  ZT2OB
                                 INTO  W_COUNT
                                 WHERE SUPPL_CD   = W_SUPPL_CD
                                 AND   INVC_NO    = W_INVC_NO
                                 AND   INVC_LN_NO = T_SCR_ITEMS-INVC_LN_NO.
    Error: "COUNT( OBOX_CNTNO )" is only valid in the extended form "COUNT( DIS
    OBOX_CNTNO )" . . .
    The query seems obsolete in ECC6.0. Can anybody help me to give valid query for this in ECC6.0?

    Hi,
    <b>Count</b> functionality is to be used along with <b>Distinct</b> functionality.
    COUNT( DISTINCT col )
    <b>Reward points if this helps,</b>
    Kiran

  • Sub-Select Count query breaking TOAD

    Oracle 10.2.0.4.0
    Running TOAD 9.1
    I am running some SQL on our eBusiness Suite:
    SELECT pha.segment1
         , pha.type_lookup_code
         , (SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT pha2.po_header_id)
              FROM po.po_headers_all pha2
                 , po.po_lines_all pla
             WHERE pha2.po_header_id = pla.po_header_id
               AND pla.contract_id = pha.po_header_id) po_count
         , (SELECT MAX(pha2.creation_date)
              FROM po.po_headers_all pha2
                 , po.po_lines_all pla
             WHERE pha2.po_header_id = pla.po_header_id
               AND pla.contract_id = pha.po_header_id) latest_cpa_po
      FROM po.po_headers_all pha
         , po.po_vendors pv
         , po.po_vendor_sites_all pvsa
    WHERE pha.vendor_id = pv.vendor_id
       AND pha.vendor_site_id = pvsa.vendor_site_id
    --   AND pv.VENDOR_NAME LIKE 'H%'
       AND pha.vendor_id = 98
       AND pha.type_lookup_code = 'CONTRACT'
       AND pha.org_id IN(7041, 7042);The above query runs quicky (approx. 1 second). If I take out the AND pha.vendor_id = 98 then the query takes a few minutes to run.
    When I try to export it, or scroll down to view > 500 rows, TOAD crashes.
    I know this isn't a TOAD forum, but I think that this is probably an issue with my no doubt rubbish SQL.
    If I take out this sub-select, then the problem doesn't happen:
         , (SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT pha2.po_header_id)
              FROM po.po_headers_all pha2
                 , po.po_lines_all pla
             WHERE pha2.po_header_id = pla.po_header_id
               AND pla.contract_id = pha.po_header_id) po_countHowever, I can't work out a better way of getting the data I need.
    The sub-select counts POs which have been raised where the contractID on the PO line is the same as the PO Header ID from the main query.
    Any advice please, on what I could do to sort this out would be much appreciated.
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    It looks like you can replace both scalar sub-queries with a join, like this:
    WITH     header_lines_summary     AS
         SELECT    pla.contract_id
              ,       COUNT (DISTINCT pha2.po_header_id)     AS po_count
              ,       MAX (pha2.creation_date)          AS latest_cpa_po
              FROM        po.po_headers_all pha2
                 ,        po.po_lines_all   pla
             WHERE        pha2.po_header_id = pla.po_header_id
          GROUP BY       pla.contract_id
    )                                        -- Everything up to this line is new
    SELECT pha.segment1
         , pha.type_lookup_code
         , hls.po_count                              -- Changed
         , hls.latest_cpa_po                         -- Changed
      FROM po.po_headers_all     pha
         , po.po_vendors           pv
         , po.po_vendor_sites_all      pvsa
         , header_lines_summary     hls                    -- New
    WHERE pha.vendor_id          = pv.vendor_id
       AND pha.vendor_site_id     = pvsa.vendor_site_id
       AND pha.po_header_id          = hls.contract_id (+)          -- New
    --   AND pv.VENDOR_NAME      LIKE 'H%'
       AND pha.vendor_id           = 98
       AND pha.type_lookup_code      = 'CONTRACT'
       AND pha.org_id           IN (7041, 7042);Aside from the sub-query (which is entirely new), the query above is just what you posted, with 2 lines changed and 2 lines added, as marked.
    This should be more efficient, but I don't know for certain that it will solve the Toad problem.
    I hope this answers your question.
    If not, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only) for all tables, and also post the results you want from that data.
    It never hurts to say what version of Oracle you're using.

  • Alternative for select count('x') or count(*)

    Hi Gurus,
    I need to use select count(*) multiple times in a SP before and after deletion of rows from multiple tables. As this is an expensive method, do we have some alternative for Count(*), like selecting something from a system table or view instead?

    Hi
    You can know the number of rows affected by the DELETE statement in PL/SQL (if you are using PL/SQL) using sql%rowcount. So you don't really need to count the rows again after the delete took place...
    If you are deleting the same rows as selected by the second count condition (older than a particular date), in fact you only need to count rows once for each table.
    Luis

Maybe you are looking for