Select query with group and sum

Friends I have a table which has a list of item that are sold in many provinces and their selling price.
EMP_TABLE
item_code
item_desc
item_province
item_selling_price
Now I want a query which a row containing
distinct item code ,item desc,province ,sum of item_selling_price for Ontario,sum of item_selling_price for British Columbia,sum of item_selling_price for Quebec
Can anyone please tell me how to do it.
thx
m

Hello
It's always usefull to provide some test data and create table scripts etc, but does this do what you're after?
create table dt_test_t1
(item_code                     varchar2(3),
item_desc                    varchar2(10),
item_province               varchar2(20),
item_selling_price          number(3)
) tablespace av_datas;
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item1','Province1',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item1','Province2',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item1','Province2',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item2','Province1',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item2','Province1',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item2','Province1',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item3','Province2',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item3','Province2',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item3','Province2',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item4','Province1',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item4','Province1',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item4','Province2',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item5','Province2',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item5','Province1',10);
INSERT INTO dt_test_t1 VALUES('ABC','Item5','Province2',10);
SQL> SELECT
  2     item_code,
  3     item_desc,
  4     SUM(DECODE(item_province,'Province1',item_selling_price,0)) province_1_total,
  5     SUM(DECODE(item_province,'Province2',item_selling_price,0)) province_2_total
  6  FROM
  7     dt_test_t1
  8  GROUP BY
  9     item_code,
10     item_desc;
ITE ITEM_DESC  PROVINCE_1_TOTAL PROVINCE_2_TOTAL
ABC Item1                    10               20
ABC Item2                    30                0
ABC Item3                     0               30
ABC Item4                    20               10
ABC Item5                    10               20HTH
David

Similar Messages

  • Simple Select query with 'where', 'and', 'between' clauses takes time

    Hi,
    I have a select query as below
    SELECT * FROM (SELECT a.*,ROWNUM currentStartRecord From (select ai_inbound.ai_inb_seq tableseq,'AI_INBOUND' tablename,'INBOUND' direction,ai_inbound.appl,ai_inbound.ai_date datetime,ai_inbound.ic_receiver_id pg_id,ai_inbound.ic_sender_id tp_id,ai_inbound.session_no,ai_inbound.ic_ctl_no,ai_inbound.msg_set_id msg_type,ai_inbound.appl_msg_ctl_no reference_no,ai_inbound.fg_version version,ai_inbound.msg_status status,ai_inbound.input_file_name,ai_inbound.output_file_name,ai_inbound.ack_file_name from ai_inbound where ai_inbound.appl = ? and ai_inbound.ai_date between ? and ? )a where ROWNUM <= 49)where currentStartRecord >= 0
    The above query takes longer time through application than expected when the date fields are passed whereas it works fine when no date fields are passed. We are using oracle9.2 version of the database. All the indexed columns and partitioned indexed columns are rebuild.
    Kindly let me know how can i tune up the query to improve the performance.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I have a select query as below
    SELECT * FROM (SELECT a.*,ROWNUM currentStartRecord From (select ai_inbound.ai_inb_seq tableseq,'AI_INBOUND' tablename,'INBOUND' direction,ai_inbound.appl,ai_inbound.ai_date datetime,ai_inbound.ic_receiver_id pg_id,ai_inbound.ic_sender_id tp_id,ai_inbound.session_no,ai_inbound.ic_ctl_no,ai_inbound.msg_set_id msg_type,ai_inbound.appl_msg_ctl_no reference_no,ai_inbound.fg_version version,ai_inbound.msg_status status,ai_inbound.input_file_name,ai_inbound.output_file_name,ai_inbound.ack_file_name from ai_inbound where ai_inbound.appl = ? and ai_inbound.ai_date between ? and ? )a where ROWNUM <= 49)where currentStartRecord >= 0
    The above query takes longer time through application than expected when the date fields are passed whereas it works fine when no date fields are passed. We are using oracle9.2 version of the database. All the indexed columns and partitioned indexed columns are rebuild.
    Kindly let me know how can i tune up the query to improve the performance.
    Thanks

  • Help with count and sum query

    Hi I am using oracle 10g. Trying to aggregate duplicate count records. I have so far:
    SELECT 'ST' LEDGER,
    CASE
    WHEN c.Category = 'E' THEN 'Headcount Exempt'
    ELSE 'Headcount Non-Exempt'
    END
    ACCOUNTS,
    CASE WHEN a.COMPANY = 'ZEE' THEN 'OH' ELSE 'NA' END MARKET,
    'MARCH_12' AS PERIOD,
    COUNT (a.empl_id) head_count
    FROM essbase.employee_pubinfo a
    LEFT OUTER JOIN MMS_DIST_COPY b
    ON a.cost_ctr = TRIM (b.bu)
    INNER JOIN MMS_GL_PAY_GROUPS c
    ON a.pay_group = c.group_code
    WHERE a.employee_status IN ('A', 'L', 'P', 'S')
    AND FISCAL_YEAR = '2012'
    AND FISCAL_MONTH = 'MARCH'
    GROUP BY a.company,
    b.district,
    a.cost_ctr,
    c.category,
    a.fiscal_month,
    a.fiscal_year;
    which gives me same rows with different head_counts. I am trying to combine the same rows as a total (one record). Do I use a subquery?

    Hi,
    Whenever you have a problem, please post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only) from all tables involved.
    Also post the results you want from that data, and an explanation of how you get those results from that data, with specific examples.
    user610131 wrote:
    ... which gives me same rows with different head_counts.If they have different head_counts, then the rows are not the same.
    I am trying to combine the same rows as a total (one record). Do I use a subquery?Maybe. It's more likely that you need a different GROUP BY clause, since the GROUP BY clause determines how many rows of output there will be. I'll be able to say more after you post the sample data, results, and explanation.
    You may want both a sub-query and a different GROUP BY clause. For example:
    WITH    got_group_by_columns     AS
         SELECT  a.empl_id
         ,     CASE
                        WHEN  c.category = 'E'
                  THEN  'Headcount Exempt'
                        ELSE  'Headcount Non-Exempt'
                END          AS accounts
         ,       CASE
                        WHEN a.company = 'ZEE'
                        THEN 'OH'
                        ELSE 'NA'
                END          AS market
         FROM              essbase.employee_pubinfo a
         LEFT OUTER JOIN  mms_dist_copy             b  ON   a.cost_ctr     = TRIM (b.bu)
         INNER JOIN       mms_gl_pay_groups        c  ON   a.pay_group      = c.group_code
         WHERE     a.employee_status     IN ('A', 'L', 'P', 'S')
         AND        fiscal_year           = '2012'
         AND        fiscal_month          = 'MARCH'
    SELECT    'ST'               AS ledger
    ,       accounts
    ,       market
    ,       'MARCH_12'          AS period
    ,       COUNT (empl_id)       AS head_count
    FROM       got_group_by_columns
    GROUP BY  accounts
    ,            market
    ;But that's just a wild guess.
    You said you wanted "Help with count and sum". I see the COUNT, but what do you want with SUM? No doubt this will be clearer after you post the sample data and results.
    Edited by: Frank Kulash on Apr 4, 2012 5:31 PM

  • Absolute dynamic select query with dynamic join and where

    Has anyone ever tried creating an absolutely dynamic SELECT query with dynamic Join and Where conditions.
    I have a requirement of creating such a query in an Utility Class, and i have written the code. But its throwing my sysntax errors.
    Please let me know where am I going wrong OR is it really possible to create such a dynamic Query??
        SELECT (FIELDS) INTO TABLE IT_TABLES
          FROM ( (ME->TABLE1)  inner join ( me->table2 )
          on ( on_condition ) )
          WHERE (me->where_fields).
    Ags.

    It worked for me in a following way:
    select * into corresponding fields of table <result_table>
            from (join_string)
            where (l_where).
    Where the contents of join_string were dynamically build using concatenation. So it will be something like
    concatenate ME->TABLE1 'as a INNER JOIN' me->table2 'as b ON (' into join_string separated by space.
    <...>
    add here matching/reference colums, something like
    concatenate 'a~' me->TABLE1_JOIN_COL into temp1.
    concatenate 'b~' me->TABLE2_JOIN_COL into temp2.
    concatenate join_string temp1 '=' temp2 into join_string separated by space.
    <...>
    concatenate join_string ')' into join_string separated by space.
    And then use similar approach for l_where variable.

  • Sql grouping and summing impossible?

    I want to create an sql query to sum up some data but i'm starting to think it is impossible with sql alone. The data i have are of the following form :
    TRAN_DT     TRAN_RS     DEBT     CRED
    10-Jan     701     100     0
    20-Jan     701     150     0
    21-Jan     701     250     0
    22-Jan     705     0     500
    23-Jan     571     100     0
    24-Jan     571     50     0
    25-Jan     701     50     0
    26-Jan     701     20     0
    27-Jan     705     0     300The data are ordered by TRAN_DT and then by TRAN_RS. Tha grouping and summing of data based on tran_rs but only when it changes. So in the table above i do not want to see all 3 first recods but only one with value DEBT the sum of those 3 i.e. 100+150+250=500. So the above table after grouping would be like the one below:
    TRAN_DT     TRAN_RS     DEBT     CRED
    21-Jan     701     500     0
    22-Jan     705     0     500
    24-Jan     571     150     0
    26-Jan     701     70     0
    27-Jan     705     0     300The TRAN_DT is the last value of the summed records. I undestand that the tran_dt may not be selectable. What i have tried so far is the following query:
    select tran_dt,
             tran_rs,
             sum(debt)over(partition by tran_rs order by tran_dt rows unbounded preceding),
             sum(cred)over(partition by tran_rs order by tran_dt rows unbounded preceding) from that_tableIs this even possible with sql alone, any thoughts?
    The report i am trying to create in BI Publisher.Maybe it is possible to group the data in the template and ask my question there?

    915218 wrote:
    Is this even possible with sql alone, any thoughts?It sure is...
    WITH that_table as (select to_date('10/01/2012', 'dd/mm/yyyy') tran_dt, 701 tran_rs, 100 debt, 0 cred from dual union all
                         select to_date('20/01/2012', 'dd/mm/yyyy') tran_dt, 701 tran_rs, 150 debt, 0 cred from dual union all
                         select to_date('21/01/2012', 'dd/mm/yyyy') tran_dt, 701 tran_rs, 250 debt, 0 cred from dual union all
                         select to_date('22/01/2012', 'dd/mm/yyyy') tran_dt, 705 tran_rs, 0 debt, 500 cred from dual union all
                         select to_date('23/01/2012', 'dd/mm/yyyy') tran_dt, 571 tran_rs, 100 debt, 0 cred from dual union all
                         select to_date('24/01/2012', 'dd/mm/yyyy') tran_dt, 571 tran_rs, 50 debt, 0 cred from dual union all
                         select to_date('25/01/2012', 'dd/mm/yyyy') tran_dt, 701 tran_rs, 50 debt, 0 cred from dual union all
                         select to_date('26/01/2012', 'dd/mm/yyyy') tran_dt, 701 tran_rs, 20 debt, 0 cred from dual union all
                         select to_date('27/01/2012', 'dd/mm/yyyy') tran_dt, 705 tran_rs, 0 debt, 300 cred from dual)
    , brk AS (
    SELECT     tran_dt,
            tran_rs,
         debt,
         cred,
            CASE WHEN Nvl (Lag (tran_rs) OVER (ORDER BY tran_dt, tran_rs), 0) != tran_rs THEN tran_rs || tran_dt END brk_tran_rs
      FROM that_table
    ), grp AS (
    SELECT     tran_dt,
            tran_rs,
             debt,
             cred,
            Last_Value (brk_tran_rs IGNORE NULLS) OVER  (ORDER BY tran_dt, tran_rs) grp_tran_rs
      FROM brk
    SELECT     Max (tran_dt),
            Max (tran_rs),
             Sum (debt),
             Sum (cred)
      FROM grp
    GROUP BY grp_tran_rs
    ORDER BY 1, 2
    Boneist
    MAX(TRAN_    TRAN_RS       DEBT       CRED
    21-JAN-12        701        500          0
    22-JAN-12        705          0        500
    24-JAN-12        571        150          0
    26-JAN-12        701         70          0
    27-JAN-12        705          0        300
    Me
    MAX(TRAN_ MAX(TRAN_RS)  SUM(DEBT)  SUM(CRED)
    21-JAN-12          701        500          0
    22-JAN-12          705          0        500
    24-JAN-12          571        150          0
    26-JAN-12          701         70          0
    27-JAN-12          705          0        300Edited by: BrendanP on 17-Feb-2012 04:05
    Test data courtesy of Boneist, and fixed bug.
    Edited by: BrendanP on 17-Feb-2012 04:29

  • Issue in select query with where clause

    Hi guys,
    I'm facing an issue while using select query with the where clause. When I'm selecting all the data from the table it returns the correct result. But when I'm using the where clause to get the specific rows from the table it returns no rows. But the data I'm trying to fetch using the where condition exists in the table.
    Here is my query which causing the issue,
    select * from mytable where myfield = 'myvalue'
    But if I use the following query it returns the result correctly.
    select * from mytable
    Also the myfield value 'myvalue' exists in the table.
    I have tried by running this query in both SQL Developer and SQL Plus. I have tried this query in mssql as well. It works perfectly and returns correct result sets for both the queries I have mentioned above. I'm unable to predict the issue as I'm new to ORACLE. Please help.
    Thanks,
    Ram.

    Hi Ram,
    I experienced an issue similar to this with a varchar2 field. Some of our records had a hidden newline character at the end of them, which was making queries like the one below fail:
    select * from employees
    where email = '[email protected]'The best way I found to detect this was to use
    select 'XX'||email||'XX' from employeesTo make sure that there were no newlines. But that is just a guess. If you could provide some example table data and the outputs of your selects, it would be helpful.
    Jeff

  • How to write XSJS Select Query with input parameters

    Hello Experts,
    I am creating a xsjs file and in that file I am trying to write a Select Query based on a Calculation View
    I have tried it the following way:
    var query = 'SELECT TOP 100 \"Name\", \"Address\", \"City\", \"Country\" FROM \"_SYS_BIC\".\"Test.HL/AddressView\"'
        + 'WITH PARAMETERS(\'PLACEHOLDER\' = (\'$$P_Name$$\', \' Akhil \'),'
      + '\'PLACEHOLDER\' = (\'$$P_City$$\', \' Lucknow \'))';
    But it gives me the "Mixed spaces and tabs error".
    How should I write XSJS Select Query with input parameters?
    Regards,
    Rohit

    >But it gives me the "Mixed spaces and tabs error".
    Mixed spaces and tabs has nothing to do with the syntax of the statement. You used both spaces and the tab in the content - which JSLint doesn't like.  Remove the beginning spaces of each line and use only one or the other.
    The actual syntax of your statement doesn't look right.  The problem is that you are escaping the \ when you don't need to if you are using ' instead of " for your string.  You escape with \" in the first line but then escape with \' in the 2nd and 3rd line.  That is going to cause serious parsing problems with the command.

  • Dynamic select query with dynamic where condition

    Hi all,
    I want to use the dynamic select query with dynamic where condition. For that I used the below code but I am getting dump when using this code.
    Please advice, if there is any other way to achieve this requirement.
    Thanks,
    Sanket Sethi
    Code***************
    PARAMETERS: p_tabnam      TYPE tabname,
                p_selfl1      TYPE edpline,
                p_value       TYPE edpline,
                p_where1      TYPE edpline .
    DATA: lt_where    TYPE TABLE OF edpline,
          lt_sel_list TYPE TABLE OF edpline,
          l_wa_name   TYPE string,
          ls_where    TYPE edpline,
          l_having    TYPE string,
          dref        TYPE REF TO data,
          itab_type   TYPE REF TO cl_abap_tabledescr,
          struct_type TYPE REF TO cl_abap_structdescr,
          elem_type   TYPE REF TO cl_abap_elemdescr,
          comp_tab    TYPE cl_abap_structdescr=>component_table,
          comp_fld    TYPE cl_abap_structdescr=>component.
    TYPES: f_count TYPE i.
    FIELD-SYMBOLS : <lt_outtab> TYPE ANY TABLE,
    *                <ls_outtab> TYPE ANY,
                    <l_fld> TYPE ANY.
    struct_type ?= cl_abap_typedescr=>describe_by_name( p_tabnam ).
    elem_type   ?= cl_abap_elemdescr=>describe_by_name( 'F_COUNT' ).
    comp_tab = struct_type->get_components( ).
    comp_fld-name = 'F_COUNT'.
    comp_fld-type = elem_type.
    APPEND comp_fld TO comp_tab.
    struct_type = cl_abap_structdescr=>create( comp_tab ).
    itab_type   = cl_abap_tabledescr=>create( struct_type ).
    l_wa_name = 'l_WA'.
    CREATE DATA dref TYPE HANDLE itab_type.
    ASSIGN dref->* TO <lt_outtab>.
    *CREATE DATA dref TYPE HANDLE struct_type.
    *ASSIGN dref->* TO <ls_outtab>.
    * Creation of the selection fields
    APPEND p_selfl1 TO lt_sel_list.
    APPEND 'COUNT(*) AS F_COUNT' TO lt_sel_list.
    ** Creation of the "where" clause
    *CONCATENATE p_selfl1 '= '' p_value ''.'
    *            INTO ls_where
    *            SEPARATED BY space.
    *APPEND ls_where TO lt_where.
    * Creation of the "where" clause
    APPEND p_where1 TO lt_where.
    * Creation of the "having" clause
    l_having = 'count(*) >= 1'.
    * THE dynamic select
    SELECT          (lt_sel_list)
           FROM     (p_tabnam)
           INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <lt_outtab>.
    *       WHERE    (lt_where).

    Hi Sanket,
    The above given logic of mine works for you, put the code in the If condition and try-
    just like below:
    IF NOT P_EBELN IS INITIAL.
    lt_where = '& = ''&'' '.
    REPLACE '&' WITH p_ebeln INTO lt_where.
    REPLACE '&' WITH field_value INTO lt_where.
    SELECT (lt_sel_list) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <lt_outtab>
    FROM (p_tabnam)
    WHERE (lt_where).
    ENDIF.
    thanks\
    Mahesh

  • BDC select query with addition based on all If conditions

    Hi can any one send me the select query with conditions like
    If Itab is not initial.
    Endif. and if possible with valiadations messages also.
    IF CHECK_NUMBER of CHECK_ADVICE of the flat file = PAYR-CHECT. Then update SAP field BSEG-XREF2 .
    9.     When Flat file check Number = PAYR-CHECT then Insert or Update Flat file RECEIPT_DATE into SAP field BSEG-XREF1.
    Please send me immediately.

    >     SELECT rsnum
    >            rspos
    >            matnr
    >            werks
    >         lgort
    >            shkzg
    >            aufnr
    >            bdmng
    >            enmng                      
    >            FROM  resb INTO  TABLE it_rsnum FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_aufnr
    >            WHERE rsnum EQ it_aufnr-rsnum
    >            AND   xloek NE 'X'
    >            AND   postp NE 'X'
    >            AND   resbbdmng GE resbenmng.
    >   ENDIF.
    >
    > Database Table RESB: 40,000,000 Records (40 Million)
    > Internal Table   it_aufnr:  20,000 Entries
    > Entries selected from RESB: 150,000.
    >
    Hi,
    the problem is the big for all entries table.
    Your 20.000 records FAE will be split into SEVERAL sql statements depending on the size of the table.
    Where do you get the it_auftrn from?
    If it's another transparent table try to JOIN this table to your big table.
    SELECT rsnum
                rspos
                matnr
                werks
            lgort
                shkzg
                aufnr
                bdmng
                enmng                      
                FROM  resb JOIN tab_auftrn  on  resbrsnum = tab_auftrnauftrn
                AND   xloek NE 'X'
                AND   postp NE 'X'
                AND   resbbdmng GE resbenmng.
    Make sure that your WHERE filter and the JOIN keys on both tables are supported by indexes.
    150.000 records about of 40 Mio. can definitly be serviced by an appropriate index:
    i.e. Index fields (check your PK or secondary indexes):
    rsnum
    enmng                      
    aufnr
    bye
    yk

  • Wrong result for query with like and %

    I have a strange problem with query with like and %.
    When I run this script:
    ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT = 'BINARY_CI';
    ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP = 'LINGUISTIC';
    -- SELECT * FROM NLS_SESSION_PARAMETERS;
    -- drop table test1;
    CREATE TABLE TEST1(K1 NVARCHAR2(80));
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('gsdk');
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('ąxyz');
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('ŁFa');
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('ła');
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('Śab');
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('Śrrrb');
    commit;
    select * from TEST1 where k1 like N'Ł%';
    I get this:
    K1
    ŁFa
    ła
    Śab <- WRONG
    Śrrrb <- WRONG
    4 rows selected
    When i change datatype to varchar2 this code work correct.
    Is this a bug or what ?
    The execution plan:
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    SQL_ID d3d64aupz4bb5, child number 2
    select * from TEST1 where k1 like N'Ł%'
    Plan hash value: 4122059633
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 2 (100)| |
    |* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST1 | 1 | 82 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    1 - filter((NLSSORT("K1",'nls_sort=''BINARY_CI''')>=HEXTORAW('014200'
    ) AND NLSSORT("K1",'nls_sort=''BINARY_CI''')<HEXTORAW('01610100') ))
    Note
    - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

    DATABASE NLS CONFIGURATION:
    NLS_CHARACTERSET AL32UTF8
    NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET     AL16UTF16
    NLS_COMP     BINARY
    NLS_SORT     BINARY
    Oracle version 11.2.0.2.0

  • Need complex query  with joins and AGGREGATE  functions.

    Hello Everyone ;
    Good Morning to all ;
    I have 3 tables with 2 lakhs record. I need to check query performance.. How CBO rewrites my query in materialized view ?
    I want to make complex join with AGGREGATE FUNCTION.
    my table details
    SQL> select from tab;*
    TNAME TABTYPE CLUSTERID
    DEPT TABLE
    PAYROLL TABLE
    EMP TABLE
    SQL> desc emp
    Name
    EID
    ENAME
    EDOB
    EGENDER
    EQUAL
    EGRADUATION
    EDESIGNATION
    ELEVEL
    EDOMAIN_ID
    EMOB_NO
    SQL> desc dept
    Name
    EID
    DNAME
    DMANAGER
    DCONTACT_NO
    DPROJ_NAME
    SQL> desc payroll
    Name
    EID
    PF_NO
    SAL_ACC_NO
    SALARY
    BONUS
    I want to make  complex query  with joins and AGGREGATE  functions.
    Dept names are : IT , ITES , Accounts , Mgmt , Hr
    GRADUATIONS are : Engineering , Arts , Accounts , business_applications
    I want to select records who are working in IT and ITES and graduation should be "Engineering"
    salary > 20000 and < = 22800 and bonus > 1000 and <= 1999 with count for males and females Separately ;
    Please help me to make a such complex query with joins ..
    Thanks in advance ..
    Edited by: 969352 on May 25, 2013 11:34 AM

    969352 wrote:
    why do you avoid providing requested & NEEDED details?I do NOT understand what do you expect ?
    My Goal is :
    1. When executing my own query i need to check expalin plan.please proceed to do so
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e26088/statements_9010.htm#SQLRF01601
    2. IF i enable query rewrite option .. i want to check explain plan ( how optimizer rewrites my query ) ? please proceed to do so
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16638/ex_plan.htm#PFGRF009
    3. My only aim is QUERY PERFORMANCE with QUERY REWRITE clause in materialized view.It is an admirable goal.
    Best Wishes on your quest for performance improvements.

  • Sql query with conditions and calculations???

    Hi,
    how I can build a query with conditions and calculations?
    E.g. I've got this table
    Start          | End     |     Working Place     |     Mandatory
    01-JAN-13 | 11-JAN-13 |     Office           |          1
    14-JAN-13 | 25-JAN-13 |     Home Office      |     0
    04-MRZ-13| 15-MRZ-13 |     Office           |          0
    11-FEB-13 | 22-FEB-13 |     Office           |          1
    Now if column working place=Office and column mandatory=0
    the new column "price" has to calculate: (End-Start)* $25.00
    and if working place=Office and column mandatory=1
    the "price" column has to calculate: (End-Start)* $20.60
    else $0.00
    I tried it with the case statement but I didn't know how
    to calculate my values and display it to the virtual column "price".
    Something like
    case
    when Working_Place = 'Office' and Mandatory=1
         then ...
    else '0.00'
    end as PRICE
    Or is it not possible?
    Edited by: DB2000 on 12.03.2013 05:09

    Use CASE:
    select  start_dt,
            end_dt,
            working_place,
            mandatory,
            case
              when working_place = 'Office' and mandatory = 0 then (end_dt - start_dt) * 25
              when working_place = 'Office' and mandatory = 1 then (end_dt - start_dt) * 20.60
              else 0
            end price
      from  tbl
    START_DT  END_DT    WORKING_PLA  MANDATORY      PRICE
    01-JAN-13 11-JAN-13 Office               1        206
    14-JAN-13 25-JAN-13 Home Office          0          0
    04-MAR-13 15-MAR-13 Office               0        275
    11-FEB-13 22-FEB-13 Office               1      226.6
    SQL> SY.

  • Urgent - I have written select query between loop and endloop, Ple help out

    Can any one help out me on this select query. I have written select query between loop and endloop. When I execute the program it will take too much time in this query. Please help me out. Its very urgent.
    LOOP AT l_i_invoices ASSIGNING <l_invoices>.
          CLEAR alv_wa.
          alv_wa-bukrs = <l_invoices>-bukrs.
          alv_wa-gsber = <l_invoices>-gsber.
          CLEAR l_instid.
          CONCATENATE <l_invoices>-belnr <l_invoices>-gjahr INTO l_instid.
          SELECT top_wi_id FROM sww_wi2obj INTO TABLE l_i_swwwihead
                  WHERE catid   = c_catid_business_object
                    AND instid  = l_instid
                    AND typeid  = c_typeid_invoice
                    AND removed = space
                    AND ( wi_rh_task = c_task_buyer_message
                       OR wi_rh_task = c_task_buyer_message2 ).
          IF sy-subrc = 0.
            <l_invoices>-flag = 'X'.
          ELSE.
            <l_invoices>-flag = ' '.
          ENDIF.
          MODIFY l_i_invoices FROM <l_invoices> TRANSPORTING flag
                                WHERE belnr = <l_invoices>-belnr
                                   AND gjahr = <l_invoices>-gjahr.
          APPEND alv_wa TO i_alv.
        ENDLOOP.
    Thanks in advance.

    Here is a way to solve this problem.
    Choose somewhere before this loop processing to use that select. Therefore, you'll need use FOR ALL ENTRIES <that_loop_table> clause, and in the WHERE condition you need to specify that same fields.
    This way, you will have an internal table with all data you'll need to check.
    Then, inside your loop statement, use the READ TABLE command with the clause WITH KEY field = value, to read that record and use the value found.
    Like this sample:
      SELECT bukrs lifnr umsks umskz augdt augbl zuonr gjahr belnr buzei
             waers xblnr blart gsber ebeln zfbdt zbd1t zlsch
      INTO TABLE tg_bsak
      FROM bsak
      FOR ALL ENTRIES IN tl_bkpf_sel
      WHERE bukrs EQ tl_bkpf_sel-bukrs AND
            lifnr IN s_lifnr AND
            augbl EQ tl_bkpf_sel-belnr.
    LOOP AT tg_bseg INTO wa_bseg.
        READ TABLE tg_bsak INTO wa_bsak WITH KEY bukrs = wa_bseg-bukrs
                                                 gjahr = wa_bseg-gjahr
                                                 belnr = wa_bseg-belnr
                                                 BINARY SEARCH.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
    * do something
    endif.
    ENDLOOP.

  • CAML Query with 10 AND conditions

    Hello,
    I need some help with a CAML query. This particular query needs to have 10 AND conditions. Quite frankly, with all the nesting it is driving me a little nuts:
    What I have is:
    <Query>
    <Where>
    <And>
    <And>
    <And>
    <And>
    <And>
    <And>
    <And>
    <And>
    <And>
    <Eq><FieldRef Name='Column1' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>10341</Value></Eq>
    <Eq><FieldRef Name='Column2' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>9539</Value></Eq>
    </And>
    <Eq><FieldRef Name='Column3' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>183</Value></Eq>
    </And>
    <Eq><FieldRef Name='Column4' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>35</Value></Eq>
    </And>
    <IsNull><FieldRef Name='Column5' /></IsNull>
    </And>
    <Eq><FieldRef Name='Column6' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>4387</Value></Eq>
    </And>
    <Eq><FieldRef Name='Column7' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>4204</Value></Eq>
    </And>
    <Eq><FieldRef Name='Column8' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>36</Value></Eq>
    </And>
    <Eq><FieldRef Name='Column9' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>213</Value></Eq>
    </And>
    <IsNull><FieldRef Name='Column10' /></IsNull>
    </And>
    </Where>
    </Query>
    I have added this into my ItemAdding Event Receiver as it will basically do a check for duplicate items based on the 10 columns. 
    If anyone can help guide me in this, it would be much appreciated. I have been using a CAML Query Builder to help.

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xji7jOxa5_EJ:aasai-sharepoint.blogspot.com/2013/02/caml-query-with-multiple-conditions.html+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6203821/caml-query-with-nested-ands-and-ors-for-multiple-fields
    Since you are not allowed to put more than two conditions in one condition group (And | Or) you have to create an extra nested group (MSDN). The expression
    A AND B AND C looks like this:
    <And>
    A
    <And>
    B
    C
    </And>
    </And>
    Your SQL like sample translated to CAML (hopefully with matching XML tags ;) ):
    <Where>
    <And>
    <Or>
    <Eq>
    <FieldRef Name='FirstName' />
    <Value Type='Text'>John</Value>
    </Eq>
    <Or>
    <Eq>
    <FieldRef Name='LastName' />
    <Value Type='Text'>John</Value>
    </Eq>
    <Eq>
    <FieldRef Name='Profile' />
    <Value Type='Text'>John</Value>
    </Eq>
    </Or>
    </Or>
    <And>
    <Or>
    <Eq>
    <FieldRef Name='FirstName' />
    <Value Type='Text'>Doe</Value>
    </Eq>
    <Or>
    <Eq>
    <FieldRef Name='LastName' />
    <Value Type='Text'>Doe</Value>
    </Eq>
    <Eq>
    <FieldRef Name='Profile' />
    <Value Type='Text'>Doe</Value>
    </Eq>
    </Or>
    If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

  • How to re-write this big SELECT Query with INNER JOINs?

    Hi Experts
    I have a performance killer SELECT query with an inner join of 3 tables u2013 VBAP, VBAK and VBEP together, which populates records to an internal table INT_COLL_ORD. Based on these records selected, in another SELECT query, records are fetched from VBUK table to the internal table INT_VBUK.
    SELECT A~VBELN A~POSNR A~MATNR A~KWMENG A~KBMENG A~ERDAT A~ERZET A~PSTYV D~AUART E~ETTYP E~EDATU
    INTO TABLE INT_TAB_RES
    FROM VBAP AS A INNER JOIN VBAK AS D
    ON D~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND D~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
    INNER JOIN VBEP AS E
    ON E~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND E~POSNR EQ A~POSNR AND E~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
    WHERE  A~VBELN IN s_VBELN AND
           D~auart in s_auart AND
           D~vkorg in s_vkorg AND
           D~vbtyp eq 'C'     AND
           ( ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_sp AND zz_msposnr NE 0 AND kbmeng EQ 0 )
           OR ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_fp AND kwmeng NE A~kbmeng ) ) AND
           A~ABGRU EQ SPACE AND
           A~MTVFP IN R_MTVFP AND
           A~PRCTR IN R_PRCT AND
           E~ETENR EQ '1'.
    SORT INT_COLL_ORD BY VBELN POSNR ETTYP.
    DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_TAB_RES COMPARING VBELN POSNR.
    CHECK NOT INT_TAB_RES [] IS INITIAL.
    SELECT VBELN UVALL CMGST INTO TABLE INT_VBUK
    FROM VBUK FOR ALL ENTRIES IN INT_TAB_RES
    WHERE VBELN = INT_TAB_RES-VBELN AND UVALL NE 'A'.
    Now, the requirement is:
    I want to split this query. Like, first join VBAK and VBUK first. With this selection, go to the inner join of VBAP and VBEP (on key VBELN) to get the results. How can I re-write this Query?
    Please help.
    Thx n Rgds

    Hi Nagraj
    As of your suggestion, I have re-written the query as below:
    * Declarations
    TYPES: BEGIN OF TYP_COLL_ORD,
            VBELN  LIKE VBAK-VBELN,
            POSNR  LIKE VBUP-POSNR,
            MATNR  LIKE VBAP-MATNR,
            KWMENG LIKE VBAP-KWMENG,
            KBMENG LIKE VBAP-KBMENG,
            ERDAT  LIKE VBAK-ERDAT,
            ERZET  LIKE VBAK-ERZET,
            PSTYV  LIKE VBAP-PSTYV,
            AUART  LIKE VBAK-AUART, u201Calready exists in type
            ETTYP  LIKE VBEP-ETTYP,
            EDATU  LIKE VBEP-EDATU.
    TYPES: END OF TYP_COLL_ORD.
    DATA: INT_COLL_ORD TYPE TABLE OF TYP_COLL_ORD WITH HEADER LINE.
    TYPES: BEGIN OF TYP_VBUK,
            AUART  LIKE VBAK-AUART, u201Chave added this field
            VBELN  LIKE VBUK-VBELN,
            UVALL  LIKE VBUK-UVALL,
            CMGST  LIKE VBUK-CMGST.
    TYPES: END OF TYP_VBUK.
    DATA: INT_VBUK TYPE TABLE OF TYP_VBUK WITH HEADER LINE.
    *QUERY#1 u2013 for VBAK & VBUK Join
    SELECT A~AUART B~VBELN B~UVALL B~CMGST
    INTO TABLE INT_VBUK
    FROM VBAK AS A INNER JOIN VBUK AS B
    ON A~VBELN EQ B~VBELN
    WHERE A~VBELN IN s_VBELN AND
    A~auart in s_auart AND
    A~vkorg in s_vkorg AND
    A~vbtyp eq 'C' AND
    B~UVALL NE 'A'.
    IF NOT INT_VBUK[] IS INITIAL.
    SORT INT_VBUK BY VBELN.
    DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_VBUK COMPARING VBELN.
    *QUERY#2 u2013 for VBAP & VBEP Join
    SELECT A~VBELN A~POSNR A~MATNR A~KWMENG A~KBMENG A~ERDAT A~ERZET A~PSTYV B~ETTYP B~EDATU
    INTO TABLE INT_COLL_ORD
    FROM VBAP AS A INNER JOIN VBEP AS B
    ON B~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND B~POSNR EQ A~POSNR AND B~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN INT_VBUK
    WHERE A~VBELN = INT_VBUK-VBELN AND
    ( ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_sp AND zz_msposnr NE 0 AND kbmeng EQ 0 )
    OR ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_fp AND kwmeng NE A~kbmeng ) ) AND
    A~ABGRU EQ SPACE AND
    A~MTVFP IN R_MTVFP AND
    A~PRCTR IN R_PRCT AND
    B~ETENR EQ '1'.
    ENDIF.
      SORT INT_COLL_ORD BY  VBELN POSNR ETTYP.
      DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_COLL_ORD
        COMPARING VBELN POSNR.
      CHECK NOT INT_COLL_ORD[] IS INITIAL.
      LOOP AT INT_COLL_ORD.
        CLEAR: L_MTART,L_ATPPR,L_ETTYP.
        IF L_PREVIOUS_ETTYP NE INT_COLL_ORD-ETTYP OR
          L_PREVIOUS_AUART NE INT_COLL_ORD-AUART.
          READ TABLE INT_OVRCTL WITH KEY AUART = INT_COLL_ORD-AUART ETTYP = INT_COLL_ORD-ETTYP.
          CHECK SY-SUBRC NE 0.
    Now, the issue is:
    Please note that declaration for INT_COLL_ORD has a field AUART, which is used in further parts of program (see the statement just above)
    But, since neither VBAP nor VBEP contains AUART field, it cannot be fetched through the QUERY#2. So this value is not populated into INT_COLL_ORD through SELECT Query.
    Since this field is used in later part of program & that the internal table has no value for this field, it dumps!!
    How to include this value into the INT_COLL_ORD?
    Plz suggest....

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to edit Information of a user in sharepoint 2013.

    hi, i am trying to update user information in sharepoint 2013.but the user information form is uneditable , when i click on Edit item link the window pop up with only attachment field. how to enable the fields on form? any help would be appriciated.

  • Queries on oracle hang after index creation

    Hi, I have a problem where queries issued on an oracle database hang after I create indexes on some of the tables used by these queries. I have a script where I drop indexes : DROP INDEX EVP_PCON00_CDSITC_IX; DROP INDEX EVP_PCS202_STIMP1_IX; DROP IND

  • How to Create Hierarchy

    Dear Experts!!!!!!!!!! Can some one explain me in detail, how to create hierarchy. both internal and external hierarchy,methodology,steps................. Thanks in advance...... Regards, Suman.T

  • Logic Express no MIDI instrument output

    I use Express with an M-Audio Fast Track Ultra. Always had no problems, but now when I load a software instrument, I get MIDI input trigger messages but no monitoring output. In other words, if I record then playback, I hear what i recorded, but I ca

  • HT5129 I am having trouble downloading  the images, It locks up during down loading.

    Nice Idea, wish you could down load one album or several albums as a time, I have been trying to down load my images and the system keeps hanging up, I have about 200 albums and 20,000 images.   It appears the down load begins by setting up each fold