Set screen resolution, and full screen view mode (F11)

Hi,
I have a jsp page which only looks right in 1280x1024. Can I write some kind of code to set the browser to always be 1280x1024 and the view mode to be full screen regardless of the client's setting?
I would like to thank all for responding to my previous questions/problems.

Hi,
after all, try <body onload="window.resizeTo(width,height);">. It works for me. You can also turn off navigation bars etc. See http://forums.devarticles.com/javascript-development-22/change-window-size-and-nav-bar-status-on-page-load-2091.html for example - or google "javascript resize window".
However, I don't know of a method to set the window to an F11-like fullscreen mode.
Regards,
Patrik

Similar Messages

  • Full screen images and full screen color background boxes are cropping horizontally.

    Full screen images aren't loading and full screen color background boxes are cropping horizontally. I'm forced to make my images a full screen slide show (of 1 image) to make it work, but then I lose the option to pin the image. Am I alone in this?

    Hello,
    I would request you to share the a url or few screenshot so that i can get better idea about the issue.
    To create a temporry url you can go to File > publish in muse.
    Regards
    Vivek

  • Timeline and full screen view in PSE11

    I have read as many reviews of PSE11 as I can find but none have mentioned the Timeline, which I use every day. Does it still exist in PSE11? What about the full screen view and compare side by side view? Do they still exist. If they do, can you still see the image full-size by clicking on it in full screen view?

    Timeline and Full Screen View exists in PSE11 and all the earlier functionalities present in full screen view are present. The Timeline and Full Screen View can be accessed from View menu of Elements Organizer.

  • How to make the finder window expand to full height AND width of my screen, but not "full screen mode".

    The new green button on the finder window makes the screen go into full screen takeover mode - alt clicking this makes it 100% height of the screen.
    How can I make this 100% width and height (just like it used to be in Mavericks)?
    I have 2 x 27" monitors, so the "full screen takeover" mode is not right as I only want the finder window to be on one monitor whilst I work on another.
    Any ideas?! Thank you!

    Was about to post the same question.
    Ever since I upgraded to Yosemite (about a month ago), this odd behavior has irked me.
    Could it be that it only plagues those of us running dual displays? And therefore nobody else cares?

  • I was trying to fix my screen resolution and now it's stuck on auto detect cannot display this video mode. I tried another monitor and it still won't show anything. I'm locked out

    I was trying to fix my screen resolution and now it's stuck on auto detect cannot display this video mode. I tried another monitor and it still won't show anything. I'm locked out

    Reset the SMC and PRAM
    Intel-based Macs: Resetting the System Management Controller (SMC)
    About NVRAM and PRAM
    Next try Safe Mode boot and and then normal boot
    OS X: What is Safe Boot, Safe Mode?

  • Best screen resolution and output for CBT

    What would be the best screen resolution and output mode IYO for a CBT (Computer Based Training) program?  We would like to do either CD or online.  We are toying with either, so which do you think would be a better option for what Captivate is capable of?  Thanks!

    Nclarkats,
    While most of our employees have similar screen resolutions, a few have larger (or smaller) set ups and since we wish to avoid horizontal and vertical scroll bars; we publish with Captivate's 800 x 600 setting.  This allows us to get a bit larger imagery in place.
    Whatever you choose, try and pick something and stay consistent.  This is beneficial in the event you have to transfer slides between modules.
    Hope that helps.
    Chuck

  • "Fit to Screen" while in full screen mode - image fits behind palettes.

    Is there a way to "fit to screen" when in full screen mode and NOT have my image go behind my open palettes (Layers, etc.)? I am hoping there's a way for me to hit command zero and have my image fit perfectly between palettes. Every time I hit command zero I have to readjust my image or zoom out so I can see the whole thing. (Photoshop CS5)

    Not that I know of.  I address this problem two way.  I add a second display an move the Photoshop Pallets I use the most out of Photoshop's main window onto the second display docked to each other and open expanded.  The Palettes I do not use often I dock to Photoshop Main windows right side collapsed. Even if you do a view actual pixel Photoshop only zoom the image area to all the space between the docked tools palette on the left and the collapse docked palettes on the right. The pallet are only over the image window when you expand one open to use it. If you view the following screen capture in a new tab or window you can scale it to its actual size and scroll around over it. My TwoScreen workspace....

  • YouTube Chromeless Player ceases to enlarge up to Full Screen width in Full Screen mode

    Hello all!
    I tested my skin for YouTube Chromeless player, and seems it worked properly.
    All graphic elements, including TLFTextFields, are stored in external SWF, all the AS3 code - in loading SWF.
    I use ProLoader class to load SWF.
    However, when I tried to attach Player skin code to my Home Page code, I immediately bumped into two issues:
    1. TLFTextFields ceased to display proper font;
    2. YouTube Chromeless player ceased to enlarge up to Full Screen width in Full Screen mode, whereas all publishing settings were kept the same...
    Although I managed to cope with TLFTextField bug by replacing instances with vars in loaded SWF, I have no the slightest idea what to do with those paddings in Full Screen mode... Neither removing all children on stage before loading YouTube Player skin, nor compulsory resetting player's size can't make it work...  
    Any help appreciated !!!

    Thanks for the reply Andrei!
    No, the issue is not there. My monitor resolution is 1280x1024 only, and I just watched via Skype how it looks on 1920x1080.
    Moreover, as I mentioned above, the Player skin per se works more or less properly (whereas attached to the Home page doesn't).
    And EVERYTHING, including YouTube player enlargement, looks good in 'standalone' version...
    You may have a look at these two links:
    - YouTube Player skin. Standalone
    - Customised YouTube Player. Full project
    What is added in full project:
    1. One background image: MovieClip
    2. One background title: TLFTextField
    3. Five buttons + one intro player: VideoPlayer
    4. One masking rectangle: Sprite
    I wonder what may cause such deviation in behaviour ?..
    P.S. Any other bugs report (especially with screenshots) are also appreciated
    UPD: Actually, buttons are not just VideoPlayers. All of them are MovieClips, which included two VideoPlayers, one TLFTextField and two Sprites...

  • MISSION CONTROL, LAUNCHPAD, and FULL SCREEN APPS (one month later)

    I'm pretty good embracing a new thing when it comes along.  I downloaded LION the day it come out, which was over a month ago at this point. On that day, I immediately found MISSION CONTROL and LAUNCHPAD both uninituitve and pointless.  Unhandy iCandy.   And of FULL SCREEN APPS?  Not necessary on an iMac anyway.
    So I quickly sought out quick solutions to 'fix' these new features.  Launchpad and full screen apps have the advantage that they can be simply ignored.  This is a good thing.  Mission Control, on the other hand, got in the way of a beloved feature for me:  what was once SPACES and EXPOSE.  That is, I couldn't simply ignore MC because I still needed the previous helpful features in Snow Leopard.
    My solution was kind of surprising and eye-opening.  It's complicated to explain but I thought I'd share.  This conclusion is likely best suited for someone not using a small screened Mac.  It turns out that most users (with big enough screens) don't really need Mission Control, Launchpad, Spaces, or Full Screen apps. 
    At all.
    Let's go through that conclusion, one by one:
    FULL SCREEN APPS
    If you have a relatively big screen (20 iMac for instance), why do you need Safari full screen?  Unless you intend to sit across the room from the computer, no reason.  And there's lots of bright empty space when you do this.  Do you need the Mail app full screen?  If you need reading glasses, maybe, but otherwise, nope.  I find it's easier just to stretch out an app pretty big and leave it at that.
    Full screen apps DO offer a nice feature which is making your desktop, menubar, and dock go BYE BYE.  I can see where sometimes this is a useful feature, but typically -- NOPE.  Typically I want access to my dock (to switch between open apps without the added step of cancelling full screen first), and typically I want access to my menubar so that I can glance up and see what time it is or find an app menu quickly.
    The only feature I find worthy of praise with full screen apps is that they hide the clutter on your desktop.  But there's an app in the Mac App Store which makes your desktop icons vanish with the touch of a button (CAMOUFLAGE).  I mean, what's the point of a wallpaper if you bury it with desktop clutter or eliminate it with full screen apps?  If it's a busy and distracting wallpaper, umm... you picked bad wallpaper.
    LAUNCH PAD
    LAUNCH PAD offers an iOS experience inside OS X.  At first I thought it was completely silly.  After a month now, I kinda get why it's there.  Kinda.
    You see, before LP, to duplicate it's functionality, you'd have to organize folders yourself.  Put folders of various apps together.  Place them somewhere in the finder heirarchy.  Then drag those folders into the part of the dock with the trashcan.  Then you could click them open and have access to similarly themed folders of apps.  The problem here, of course, is that unless you're a power user, you'll never do this.
    So Apple thought, AH-HA, we'll just drag into OS X a paradigm that users already get from iOS.  Clumping apps together any way you like them.  The misfire, if you ask me, is not allowing users to drag the new iOS folders straight into the dock when finished.  That is to say:  copies of said organized folders.  It's as if Apple's software people have complete contempt for the dock -- and are desperate to have users abandon it.
    My problem is that I like having folders in my dock of stuff I need.  It just works, as Steve says.  Going to the same EXACT place every time I need anything is more intuitive and graceful than ADDING an app called Launchpad that launches you into a different finder altogether.  Makes zero sense and THIS is why I say, like FULL SCREEN APPS, LP can basically be abandoned.
    By the way:  need proof that Apple has complete contempt for the Dock?
    MISSION CONTROL/SPACES
    A month has passed since MC was introduced and SPACES was eliminated.  I dare anyone to tell me why either is needed at all.  Before you get iMiffed, humor me for a moment and hear me out.
    The notion of SPACES was that it's a neat way to keep like minded open apps together.  I totally bought into this, back in the day.  So much so that I was iMiffed when it was gone in Lion.  But let's look at this closer.
    The REASON why we needed SPACES was that we could have WAY too many windows open at once on a Mac.  Right?  A big mess of windows covering each other up.  Suppose you're surfing in Safari but need iTunes?  But iTunes is hidden.  So what did you do?  You went to Spaces as step one, moused over to your iTunes space as move two, and then clicked it as move three.  Seems like a great solution until the day you discover that you could simply click on iTunes in the dock as move one and arrive at iTunes.  As one step.  Period.  Really simple, right? 
    Why have Spaces and apps dance around when you can just click the app you want and be done with it?  That's the critical observation to make in order to follow my entire line of reasoning.  Sure, it may look really cool and make Windows machines look like junk, but at the end of the day, why add two steps to something you might do 100 times a day -- switching between apps.
    So why OH why did Apple add Spaces?  Simple:  because too many apps were visible at once in one 'desktop' window.  So if you can build many new desktops, there might only be one or two in each.  Great solution.  Right?
    Wrong, as it turns out.  Because we still have the two extra steps.  It's a weak solution.  And it's in complete contempt of the Dock, which as it turns out, offers the strongest solution.
    The strong solution would be that only one app is visible in your Mac's window at all times.  Say you're in Safari.  Despite having 12 other apps open, you only see Safari.  Your dock tells you that you have other apps open, but nothing else sits in your window BUT the app you're using.  So you want to go to iTunes?  So click on it in the dock and Safari vanishes and iTunes emerges by itself.  No other windows.  What could be simpler?  (This app is freeware known as ISOLATOR.)
    If you download and try ISOLATOR, you'll say, umm, okay, but wait:  sometimes I do want more than one window in view.  Okay, fine, turn it off then.  From the handy menu bar menu.  I find that 98% of the time I need ISOLATOR on.  Mileage may vary.
    So let's recap.  One third party software removes distracting desktop clutter, the other removes distracting app windows.  Both can be toggled on and off from the menu bar.  One is free, one costs $2.  These two solutions remove the only real feature of FULL SCREEN APPS and make SPACES and it's newfangled cousin MISSION CONTROL pointless.
    Need that last one explained?  Well, what's Mission Control but a variant of spaces?  To invoke MC and switch to the needed window are those same two annoying steps Spaces added into the mix.  Nothing was fixed.  Plus, like spaces, you must invest time and energy organizing such spaces.
    Why bother?  And so I ask again:  can somebody who's read and tried the above carefully explain to me why Mission Control, Launchpad, and Full Screen Apps are really needed at all?  (Outside of small screened Macs.)  Doesn't the dock and these two sharewares together solve most problems?
    Am I missing something?

    I agree with everything you said about full screen apps, mission control and launchpad. For apps that made sense to run full screen, they already could under SL. Launchpad is totally unnecessary and Mission Control is a mere shadow of Expose and Spaces.
    However, I feel you have not given due credit to Spaces. The point of Spaces is to let one organise logical desktops for different tasks, not just a way to reduce the number of windows on display. For example, I have a Space for software development where I run Xcode and the iPhone simulator, a Firefox window showing perhaps documentation or some other websites pertaining to software development, a Finder window that is opened in the folder with my design docs. I have another Space where I have the remote login sessions, yet another Space with another Firefox window where I do general surfing and emailing. I can switch between these spaces using a keyboard shortcut, which is much quicker than having to lift my hand off the keyboard, move it over to the mouse, move the mouse pointer over the Dock, find the app and click on it, only to find that it has switched to the wrong window of the app.
    Without Spaces, organisation of my desktop is disrupted each time I want to switch task, whereas Spaces allows me to drop everything I am doing, go and do something completely different for a while and go back to my exact previous environment. I have a 27" iMac so am not short of screen space but I use Spaces extensively. BTW, switching Spaces using a keyboard shortcut is a lot faster on SL than the equivalent on Lion, thanks to the gratuitous screen animation of the latter.

  • Full screen isn't full screen,unless I use "maximize" and later goes back

    I used to be able to press full screen and it would be fine and when I closed ff, upon restarting it would restart in full screen. Something has gliched. When I press full screen in regular size, the full screen isn't full, only about 90-95% of screen. I can make it go full screen if I click
    "maximize " and then full screen , but if at any time the screen isn't maximized, the same thing happens. If I close maximized and full screen
    it opens with the reduced full screen. I can't move or stretch it out in anything except normal screen, and again, not I click full screen from there. I never had this problem.

    You provided no information about installed extensions. <br />Do you have any extensions installed?
    Does Firefox do that while running in the Firefox SafeMode? <br />
    [http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode]

  • Why does my Imac screen slide and I lose my screen?  It goes back to my desktop.  Then sometimes my screen goes to full screen and I don't know how to get out of it.

    Why does my Imac screen slide and I lose my screen ~ It goes back to my desktop.
    Then sometimes my screen goes to full screen without me doing any commands, and I don't know how to get out of it without going to force quit and starting all over. 

    Hi,
    When it goes full screen try moving the mouse up to top right of scren & see if there a double diagonal Arrow to click on.
    On the other see if it's the silly implentation of Spaces/Mission Control/Expose in ML...
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4298411?start=0&tstart=0

  • Hello, I received a message to set my icloud and the screen went blank, the computer will reboot and now asks me for a PIN code unknown to me, what should I do?

    Hello, I received a message to set my icloud and the screen went blank, the computer will reboot and now asks me for a PIN code unknown to me, what should I do?

    It has been remotely locked by the owner, or by someone who knows the owner's Apple ID and password.

  • Odd Screen wallpaper behind full screen app

    My daughter showed me an odd behavior on her MacBook Pro.  When she starts/stops iTunes (most noticeable) and other apps that are in full screen mode, the screen slides over an old wallpaper that isn't visible otherwise. It's not the current wallpaper.  When I hook up an external monitor, it doesn't show up on either screen.  But when you open the full screen app the second monitor shows the mystery wallpaper.  Ctrl-click on the screen doesn't bring up the context menu that would let me change the wallpaper.  If the change-wallpaper panel is already open when you start the full-screen app, it and the wallpaper it was on slide off the screen.   Anyone know how to remove /change the image behind the full screen app transition?

    The legacy android viewer didn't support inline videos so they always played full screen. The native Android viewer properly supports inline and full screen. If you want the video to play full screen you have to explicitly set that option in the folio overlay panel on your video overlays.
    See Digital Publishing Suite Help | Video overlays for more details on how to use the video overlays panel to set this option.
    Neil

  • Lion Screen Sharing with Full Screen apps on Remote Lion

    Has anyone figured out how to EASILY work with multiple desktops and full screen apps on the remote mac when Screen Sharing with one Lion mac from another?  All of the standard methods of switching between desktops and full screen apps (swipe, cmd + <arrow>, etc) all take place on the the local Mac, and not the remote one. 
    The only real effective methods I have found so far are using the dock (not elegant with full screen apps), and removing an app from full screen.  Either way, these methods are clumsy and do not compliment the new features that Lion provides. 

    You're not going to believe this.
    Problem was on my buddy's end.  The  slash key "/" was stuck down on her keyboard.
    Sometimes the solution is so far out of normal troubleshooting, you're luck if you ever find it...
    Nothing to see here, move along...

  • When i set page as template, set editable regions and try to view in browser IE 9 a download box com

    When I set page as template, set editable regions and try to view in browser IE 9 a download box comes up and when i click open it just opens the file again in DW.

    Use the Template to spawn a child page.  File > New > Page from Template...
    Save the child page as some_file.html and then preview that in your browsers.
    Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    Web | Graphics | Print | Media  Specialists 
    http://alt-web.com/
    http://twitter.com/altweb
    http://alt-web.blogspot.com/

Maybe you are looking for

  • Question about the Documentat​ion Tags for Source Code

    Hello, I have a question about CVI's automatic source code documentation. My problem is that is seems like you need to write all documentation for a specific tag on one line. If you don't, a line break will be inserted when the documentation is displ

  • 2 different WAP4410N stops responding

    Still having issues. I reconnected 4 laptops today on 2 different WAP4410n APs. The user will let me know if they get disconnected. Yesterday I even reflashed the firmward on them. Also in order to reconect to one of the Waps I had to cycle the power

  • Problems with JDev 11g using JBOSS and ANT

    Hi, I'm trying to migrate to JDev 11g with JBoss ( version 7.X ) as the AppServer With JDev 10g all works fine with JBoss, even the Remote Debug, all OK here is the problems I have : 1) ANT JDev doesn't save my ANT settings every time I launch ANT :

  • Help:How can I run the J2EE Client Application? Thanks

    Help:How can I run the J2EE Client Application that will access the remote J2EE1.4 application server which runs on another host computer? I have developped a stateles senterprise java bean name converter and deloyed it in the j2ee1.4 application ser

  • Original display properties on g7 laptop

    Can anyone tell me the original display properties on g7 laptop? My gamma, contrast, and brightness are all off. The icons are very washed out and hard to see. I've tried adjusting them, but can't quite get them right. Any help would be great. Thanks