Set up Level 1 Messages

Hello everyone:
I just go my new blackberry but, I am finding that it vibrates in the hostler for every email received. Is there a way to have it vibrate only for Level 1 Messages and if possible make them bolded Red, if not I will settle with just knowing how to have it vibrate for Level 1 messages only.
Thanks!

If you click on your profile icon then click on advanced then click on the profile you want to change I.e. Loud, quiet etc. There you can click on any feature that delivers a tone to your phone and change how it "rings. " Then press the back arrow to change a different feature make sure to save your changes as you back out. Now my phone has a different tone for my blackberry mail as well as level one messeges. I would imagine if you have different emails attached to your phone you could change them as well. As for making them red. I'm not sure what you mean.
~Lorrie~ Master of All Things Blackberry!

Similar Messages

Can you set isolation levels of message-driven bean transactions?

The problem: I have 3 different message-driven beans which each get a different type of message, except for a field that is common to all. That field is used as the primary key of an entity object. The message-driven beans configured to use a container managed transaction. Each message-driven bean, in processing the message, first does a lookup by primary key to see if the object associated with the key exists, and if it does not, it requests the entity's home object to create it. After that, they do further processing. The problem is that sometimes all the beans simultaneously get a message, resulting in each bean checking for the entity object at about the same time, and if they fail to find it (because none of them has created it yet), each creates an object, all with the same primary key. This is not caught until the beans start to complete their onMessage method, which I believe results in the container committing the transaction. One of the transactions will be committed successfully, while the other two will fail, get rolled back, and then be retried with the same message. The second time through, the other beans will find the entity object (since it has been created and committed) and they will complete correctly. In the end, they right thing occurs, except that there is a troubling exception or 2 in the log telling about the constraint violation (with the primary key) and the rollback. If it was just me, that would be fine, but our customer does not like to see exceptions in the log; that indicates to him that something is wrong.
So, I am looking for someway to make sure that the actions of the message-driven beans are serialized. One suggestion from a colleague was to set the isolation level of the transactions being used by the container in processing the message-driven beans' onMessage method. However, the documentation does not mention any way to do this for a message-driven bean. Suggestions?
Is the use of a UserTransaction a better way to do this? If I acquire a UserTransaction within the onMessage method of a message-driven bean, can I set its isolation level? How would this work? When I get a UserTransaction, does each client get a different transaction, or do they all get the same one?

(1) The WebLogic JMS "unit-of-order" feature is a heavily adopted feature that was specifically designed to handle similar use cases - see the JMS developer guide for extensive documentation. In your use case, if "key" is used to define UOO, then there's no limit on the number of keys that can be processed concurrently, but messages for any particular key will be processed single-threaded in the order in which they were first submitted.
Note that if you're using distributed destinations, the UOO feature is still fully supported - but the developer and/or administrator needs to decide whether to configure the destination to use "hash" or "path service" based routing (the JMS UOO edoc outlines the trade-offs).
(2) Another alternative is to use a single MDB with max-beans-free-pool that processes all three types (as the other poster suggested). I think this assumes all MDBs run on the same JVM.
(3) Another alternative is to use multiple queues, with a single MDB on each Q. Where some sort of hash algorithm is used to determine which Q is for the key. This approach is a "hand-coded" variant of the approach in (1) with "hash" based routing enabled...
(4) If all MDBs actually do run in the same JVM, a third alternative is to use code the application to use a common lock to protect each key, eg, something like:
// assume MyLock is simply a class with a "reference counter"
// assume some global "staticHM" hash map that is all MDBs can access
onMessage() {
MyLock lock = null;
key= msg.getKey();
synchronized(staticHM) {
lock = staticHM.get();
if (lock = null) {
lock = new lock();
staticHM.put(key, new lock());
lock.incRefCount();
try {
synchronized(lock) {
// only one onMessage will be able to lock a particular key at a time
do your work;
} finally {
synchronized(staticHT) {
if (lock.defRefCount() == 0) staticHM.remove(lock);
if (lock = null) staticHM.put(key);
If multiple threads get a message with the same key, then only one thread at a time will work on the key.
Hope this helps,
Tom

Setting up Level 1 message notification

I am trying to set up a special alert for level 1 emails. I was able to build a filter. I am recieving them in a "unique" color, but I am not getting any audio alert or led alert. From reading other posts, I should be able to go to Messages, Options, Filters to do this. I do not have "filters" under either General Options or Email Settings. What step am I missing.

Apologies because even to me it seems like I'm not being much help.
Level 1 works for me. Here are directions.....
http://helpblog.blackberry.com/2014/03/how-to-create-a-level-1-alert-using-blackberry-10-os-version-...
... Is there a step you are missing?
- Ira

Setting Importance Level for a email message using javax.mail.* API

Setting Importance Level for a email message using javax.mail.* API
From what I understand we can set Flag on Email Message. How can we set Importance Leve: High/Low for an email message?
Thanks
Purvi

Most of the message Flags work only for IMAP mailboxes. POP3 supports only the DELETED flag. It must be understood that Javamail is a framework which provides all the features available in a standard mailing system. But whether or not a particular feature works is a functionality of the particular implementation being used.
Thus for example POP3 cannot differentiate read from unread messages in a mailbox though Javamail provides that feature.

Setting logging level

Hello folks;
Is there a way to set the logging threshold for log messages sent to
the weblogic log? I see where to adjust logging threshold for the
standard out, but this level doesn't seem to affect the threshold for
messages getting to the physical logfile. Unlike the log4j classes
that seem to back up weblogic's logging ( I checked this out by
looking in the weblogic.jar file); there are no methods for setting
the logging threshold on weblogic's log classes.
Cheers-

I was mistaken about the log4j stuff being used under the covers.
However, changing the logging threshold does not seem to affect
messages sent to the log for my server. I just tested this again by
setting the log level to "CRITICAL" in the console. Sure enough the
messages sent to the standard out console are affected, but the
messages sent to the physical log are not affected. I still get Info,
Notice, etc messages there--- but nearly no messages to the standard
out console.
This was done on version 7.0 of weblogic.
Cheers--
"Jane Sampson" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<3e5a84b4$[email protected]>...
Hi Steve,
If you set the logging level in the Logging tab on Server Configuration, it
DOES affect the level of messages that are logged to both stdout and the
physical log. Are you sure you are looking at the correct log file?
Also, none of the weblogic classes use log4j. What version did you find
log4j classes included in the weblogic.jar??
Jane
BEA Support

Setting Item level access rights on sharepoint list item in ItemAdding event handler

Hi ,
I am using sharepoint 2013. I am trying to set item level access rights when a list item is added using the following code snippet,
public override void ItemAdding(SPItemEventProperties properties)
base.ItemAdding(properties);
ConfigureItemSecurity(properties);
private void ConfigureItemSecurity(SPItemEventProperties properties)
var item=properties.ListItem;
SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate()
using (SPSite site = new SPSite(properties.SiteId))
using (SPWeb oWeb = site.OpenWeb())
item.ParentList.BreakRoleInheritance(true);
oWeb.AllowUnsafeUpdates = true;
var guestRole = oWeb.RoleDefinitions.GetByType(SPRoleType.Reader);
var editRole = oWeb.RoleDefinitions.GetByType(SPRoleType.Editor);
SPGroup HRGroup = oWeb.SiteGroups.Cast<SPGroup>().AsQueryable().FirstOrDefault(g => g.LoginName=="HR Team");
SPRoleAssignment groupRoleAssignment = new SPRoleAssignment(HRGroup);
groupRoleAssignment.RoleDefinitionBindings.Add(guestRole);
SPUserCollection users = oWeb.Users;
SPFieldUserValueCollection hm = (SPFieldUserValueCollection)item["HiringManager"];
SPFieldUserValueCollection pm = (SPFieldUserValueCollection)item["ProjectManager"];
SPFieldUserValueCollection pmChiefs = (SPFieldUserValueCollection)item["ProjectManagerChief"];
item.BreakRoleInheritance(true);
item.RoleAssignments.Add(groupRoleAssignment);
foreach (SPFieldUserValue staffMember in hm)
SetRightsOnItem(item, staffMember, editRole);
foreach (SPFieldUserValue staffMember in pm)
SetRightsOnItem(item, staffMember, guestRole);
foreach (SPFieldUserValue staffMember in pmChiefs)
SetRightsOnItem(item, staffMember, guestRole);
item.Update();
private void SetRightsOnItem(SPListItem item, SPFieldUserValue staffMember, SPRoleDefinition role)
SPUser employeeUser = staffMember.User;
var userRoleAssignment = new SPRoleAssignment(employeeUser);
userRoleAssignment.RoleDefinitionBindings.Add(role);
item.RoleAssignments.Add(userRoleAssignment);
Nothing is happening though... Is the event handler the right place to do this?
thank you

Hi ,
You can refer to the code working in my environment:
using System;
using System.Security.Permissions;
using Microsoft.SharePoint;
using Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities;
using Microsoft.SharePoint.Workflow;
namespace ItemLevelSecurity.ItemSecurity
/// <summary>
/// List Item Events
/// </summary>
public class ItemSecurity : SPItemEventReceiver
/// <summary>
/// An item was added.
/// </summary>
public override void ItemAdded(SPItemEventProperties properties)
SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate()
try
using (SPSite oSPSite = new SPSite(properties.SiteId))
using (SPWeb oSPWeb = oSPSite.OpenWeb(properties.RelativeWebUrl))
//get the list item that was created
SPListItem item = oSPWeb.Lists[properties.ListId].GetItemById(properties.ListItem.ID);
//get the author user who created the item
SPFieldUserValue valAuthor = new SPFieldUserValue(properties.Web, item["Created By"].ToString());
SPUser oAuthor = valAuthor.User;
//assign read permission to item author
AssignPermissionsToItem(item,oAuthor,SPRoleType.Reader);
//update the item
item.Update();
base.ItemAdded(properties);
catch (Exception ex)
properties.ErrorMessage = ex.Message; properties.Status = SPEventReceiverStatus.CancelWithError;
properties.Cancel = true;
public static void AssignPermissionsToItem(SPListItem item, SPPrincipal obj, SPRoleType roleType)
if (!item.HasUniqueRoleAssignments)
item.BreakRoleInheritance(false, true);
SPRoleAssignment roleAssignment = new SPRoleAssignment(obj);
SPRoleDefinition roleDefinition = item.Web.RoleDefinitions.GetByType(roleType);
roleAssignment.RoleDefinitionBindings.Add(roleDefinition);
item.RoleAssignments.Add(roleAssignment);
Thanks,
Eric
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected].
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

Set isolation level in EJB 2.0

how can i set isolation level to a transaction in EJB 2.0.
If anybody can give example code much appriciated

For 5.1, look at:
          http://www.weblogic.com/docs51/classdocs/API_ejb/EJB_environment.html#107261
          7
          http://www.weblogic.com/docs51/classdocs/API_ejb/EJB_reference.html#1061916
          "marshalli" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          news:3a59546d$[email protected]..
          >
          > How to set the isolation level(Container Manager or Bean Manager) in EJB.
          Thanks
          >
          >

Can you set log level

Does weblogic supply any way of setting the level of log messages that
actually get written out to the log. So that if can turn off all my debug
messages (e.g. LogServicesDef log, log.info(), log.debug())
in production. I'm currently doing this with application level code

Hi,
Yes, weblogic does supply a way of setting the level of log messages that actually
get written out to the log.
This can be changed at Admin Console> idbmsDem
o> Servers> myserver> Logging> General> Stdout severity threshold>
Yuan Dai
BEA Adapter Factory Group
InfoGain
408-355-6098
"maurice lowenthal" <[email protected]> wrote:>Does weblogic supply any way
of setting the level of log messages that
actually get written out to the log. So that if can turn off all my debug
messages (e.g. LogServicesDef log, log.info(), log.debug())
in production. I'm currently doing this with application level code

Can you set the level of the logfile

Hello,
Is there a way to set the level off information put in the logfile? How can
I change this.
Kind Regards,

That only sets the level for stdout, not for the logfile.
regards,
-Ade
"Naggi Rao" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Console-->Servers-->Myserver--Logging-->Stdout severity threshold
"Ruud Janssen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Hello,
Is there a way to set the level off information put in the logfile? Howcan
I change this.
Kind Regards,

CC: Warning: -O5 overwrites previously set optimization level of -O3

I'm trying to get a clean compile of the Boost 1.32.0 library using the Studio Express August build, and in the course of that (this post is not about Boost), I get the following:
sunpro-C++-action bin/boost/libs/filesystem/build/libboost_filesystem.a/sunpro/release/exception.o
/opt/SPROexpress/opt/SUNWspro//bin//CC -O -xlang=c99 -mt \
-library=stlport4 -features=tmplife -features=tmplrefstatic -errtags=yes \
-D_POSIX_THREAD_SEMANTICS -c -DNDEBUG -DNDEBUG -fast -O4 -xtarget=generic \
-library=stlport4 -features=tmplife -features=tmplrefstatic -erroff=wbadinitl,wbadasgl \
-Qoption ccfe -complextmplexp \
-I"bin/boost/libs/filesystem/build" -I"/thirdparty/lib/boost_1_32_0" -I"/thirdparty/lib/boost_1_32_0" \
-o "bin/boost/libs/filesystem/build/libboost_filesystem.a/sunpro/release/exception.o" \
"/thirdparty/lib/boost_1_32_0/libs/filesystem/build/../src/exception.cpp"
CC: Warning: -O5 overwrites previously set optimization level of -O3
Maybe I'm doing something wrong in the way that both -O and -O4 get specified on the command line, but why is the error message specifying -O5 and -O3, neither of which I specified??

Herteg,
I see what's going on here. -O expands to -O3. That
is overridden by the -O5 which is included in the
expansion of -fast.This is correct.
Four things about this:
(1) The warning message should say "overrides", not
"overwrites".I think that there should be no warning at all. We have "rightmost wins" rule for the compiler flags, and both -O and -fast are documented well enough to understand which -O<n> (or -xO<n>) they will be translated into.
The problem is that I don't see this "rightmost wins" in the documentation for -O<n>/-xO<n>.
(2) There is no corresponding warning when the -O5 is
overridden by the following -O4. Or is it?I believe there shouldn't be one in the first place.
(3) The effect of multiple -Olevel options is
unspecified; that should be corrected in the manual.Well, it is specified, it's just not documented :-)
(4) The Sun Studio 11 C++ User's Guide is
inconsistent on the meaning of the -O option:
A.2.61 -O
The -O macro now expands to -xO3 instead of -xO2.
A.2.145 -xOlevel
On the SPARC Platform:
The -O option is equivalent to the -xO2 option.The second one is wrong. But I suppose you already know this.
Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention! Would you please file a bug through the web interface: http://bugs.sun.com/services/bugreport/index.jsp ?
Thanks,
Boris

Help on Setting logical Levels in Fact tables and on Dimension tables

Hi all
Can any body provide any blogs or any king of material on what exactly is levelling .
Like after creating the Dimensional hierarchies we need to set the logical levels for the LTS of fact tabels ri8 .So what is the difference between setting logical levels to fact tabels and also Setting levelling on Dimension tables .
Any kind of help is appreciated
Thanks
Xavier.
Edited by: Xavier on Aug 4, 2011 10:50 AM

I have read these blogs ,but what my question is
Setting the logical levels in LTS of Fact tables i understood .
But we can also set the logical levels for dimensions also ri8 .I didn't understand why do we set the logical levels for dimensions .Is there any reason why we go with the levelling at dimensions
Thanks
Xavier
Edited by: Xavier on Aug 4, 2011 2:03 PM
Edited by: Xavier on Aug 4, 2011 2:32 PM

Setting system level deployment.user.cachedir in deployment.config

G'day,
I've been experimenting with JRE 1.5.0_04 on Windows XP.
By default deployment.user.cachedir is set to <user home>\Application Data\Sun\Java\Deployment\cache. However, I want it to be <user home>\Local Settings\Application Data\Sun\Java\Deployment\cache.
I have managed this as follows.
C:\Windows\Sun\Java\Deployment\deployment.config contains:
deployment.system.config=file\:C\:/WINDOWS/Sun/Java/Deployment/deployment.propertiesand C:\Windows\Sun\Java\Deployment\deployment.properties contains:
deployment.user.cachedir=$USER_HOME\\..\\..\\..\\..\\Local Settings\\Application Data\\Sun\\Java\\Deployment\\cacheThis works but is ugly. The problem is that $USER_HOME=<user home>\Application Data\Sun\Java\Deployment. It seems that $USER_HOME and $JRE_HOME are the only two variables for use in deployment properties. Are there any others, in particular, one that mirrors the user's actual home directory?
Thanks,
Chris.

G'day,
Open the Java Console and execute "dump system and
deployment properties" which shows property values,
and see if what you want is there.Thanks, but I don't think I can use these at the system level, can I?
I did try using ${user.home} but that doesn't work.
So, are there any variables other than $USER_HOME and $JRE_HOME that can be used when setting system level properties?
More info, http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/deployment/deployment-guide/properties.html
Thanks,
Chris.

Problem with setting Source Level in Sun Studio 2

I've got problem with setting Source Level to 1.5 in Sun Studio 2. When I try to set it to 1.5 in Project properties and click Ok everything seem to go well, but when I open Project Properties again Source Level is set to 1.4. I need this to work cause I started to lear Java recently and I want to use foreach loop.
Please help

I'm just citing an example using Date().
In fact, whether I use DateFormat or Calendar, it shows the same result.
When I set the date to 1 Jan 1950 0 hours 0 minutes 0 seconds,
jdk1.4.2 will always return me 1 Jan 1950 0 hours 10 minutes 0 seconds.
It works correctly under jdk1.3.1

How do I set up a text message group on iphone

How do I set up a text message group on iphone

Go into messages, then click the icon at the top right to create a new message, then click the plus sign to add the contacts you want to text.
Is that what your asking?

How to set Priority of JMS message in the Receiver adapter

Hi,
How can I set the priority of message going to MQ in the receiver JMS adapter. I tried to set a value in the <b>JMS message Priroty</b> field. But it is not working.
In the receiving queue manager the default priority of the queue which receives data is set to 0.
Can anyone suggest how to get this done.
Thanks in Advance
Abinash

Hi Ravi,
If I am not wrong You are referring to article <b>Queues for Prioritized Message</b>. But this is about how to Prioritize message inside XI.
What I am intresetd in is to set a message priority (for example "2")for the message going to MQ. That is when the message reached the detination queue the priority of this message should be 2 in the queue.
Thanks
Abinash

Set up Level 1 Messages

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for