Severe Samba performance decrease after u6 - u7 upgrade

I just upgraded my Solaris 10 x86 system from u6 (kernel 138889-08) to u7 using LiveUpgrade. I have samba sharing some ZFS filesystems, and the first thing I noticed after the upgrade was a severe performance decrease in reading files via smb.
For example, using smbget from a MacOS client to retrieve a particular test file, pre-upgrade I was getting about 30Mb/sec, but after the upgrade to u7 I'm only getting 100Kb/sec. If I boot back to my alternate boot environment that still has u6, performance returns to normal. This happened when u7 was first released, so I just ignored it and went back to u6, and now I tried u7 again yesterday and applied all of the current security and most recommended patches (including the latest samba patch) and am still experiencing the same behavior.
I don't currently have any socket options or other performance tuning in my smb.conf, it is about as simple as possible with just a couple share definitions.
Any ideas why the upgrade would cause such problems for samba? The only troubleshooting I can think to check is that the network card (e1000g) isn't getting errors all of a sudden after the upgrade, but netstat -i shows everything is working as expected; 0 errors/collisions/etc.
Any suggestions would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Matthew

Hi Experts,
After i tried a few times, i can successfully start prepare with upgrade asistant monitor - Administrator >> Start Prepare,
Thanks

Similar Messages

Performance Hit After Oracle Database Upgrade to 10.2.0.4

We have a couple dozen workbooks that took this performance hit after the upgrade of the database/migration to a new server. Worksheets that executed in the ten second range are now running for hours or simply not finishing. We took the new server factor out of the equation by rolling back the database to 10.2.0.3 where a test EUL resides and the problem was resolved. Has anyone seen this issue? Does anyone have an suggestions? An early reply would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jerre

Rod,
Thanks for the quick reply. We are looking at the different plans and modifying the optimizer settings, switching back and forth, as we speak. We are now starting with the hints. Currently our Server 'optimizer_mode' parameter is ALL_ROWS. We are planning to change the to 'Choose' and see what happens. The workbooks that are impacted are on our oldest business areas of Finance and HR. The former setup was borrowed from another school for a quick, low cost start up. The latter was thrown together by novices. Our true datamarts developed by knowledgeable personnel with star schemas are not impacted. Of course we are planning on redoing the older business areas but time, personnel and money matters slow things down. It is these workbooks on the older business areas that are greatly affected by the migrations and upgrade. We eventually get things to settle down but past actions do not always have the same resolution with newer and better servers and upgrades.
Thanks,
Jerre

MBP 2011/MC724 performance decreasing after firmware updating

On the third day after buying a suddenly degraded performance. No additional software installed (except for the adobe flash player).
Perhaps the problem is caused by a firmware update. I've Installed it from the standard upgrades. System Restore from DVD (with full HD cleaning), not solve problem.
Current performance can not even watch videos on youtube.
Who else is having the same problem with apple mbp 2011?
What do I do with it? How to fix the problem?
thank you in advance for your help.
Sasha.

youtube, safari, showing spaces and so on. Heavy freezes. Even during the first boot (after recovery from the DVD) when the music plays, there are freezes and crackling sound.

Performance decreased after updating the PFI? wtf?

I just updated the PFI to the version released on 10.11.10 from the one that came with the original installation. I didn't change anything in my project, just recompiled it using the new PFI. And when I uploaded to my IPhone the performance appeared to be worse than before. Some of the animations were ok smooth before (12fps) and are now very jaggy (about 5fps i would guess). Also when I ctrl-enter on the computer, the screen is in portrait mode even though I set it to landscape and the size of the stage is 480w*320h. Can someone please explain to me what is going on? Thank you

I have followed the same tips earlier (After upgrade) but there is no result, especially i have noticed that only during night hours it looses charging, last list night after hard reset i have kept the charging of 100% arround at 11:00pm and again i have checked on next day morning arround at 6:00am it shows 25% only.
In just earlier release 7.0.3 i dont face these kind of problem. Once i did complete charging easily i can use the phone 2 days. i am waiting for next release may be that resolves my issue.

I have used Firefox on my computer for several years. Today, after upgrading to the new version, I was not able to open Firefox. I have tried several times uninstalling and re-downloading Firefox. It still will not open! What is wrong?

I have used Firefox on my computer for several years. Today, after upgrading to the new version, I was not able to open Firefox. I have tried several times uninstalling and re-downloading Firefox. It still will not open! Is the new version not compatible with Windows Vista?

I hope that link points to mozilla.com or mozilla.org
You will have to close firefox.exe with the Windows Task Manager from the "Processes" tab of the WTM since you don't have a widow to close.
The best way to close Firefox is through File > Exit, for those who stuck with the "Firefox" button click on the Firefox button then Exit. It is not perfect but it is a lot better than just closing the window with the "X" in the upper right corner

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

Performance Issues after an Upgrade

Hello!
We are experiencing performance issues after we upgraded to a new version of Hyperion (11.1.2.1). At this point, I am not too sure about the actual causes for this degrade in performance but I am trying to narrow down the causes and need your inputs. Please help me with your ideas.
1) What could be the causes/factors for the performance to degrade after an upgrade?
2) Does the performance of a script depend on the user credentials i.e. who is launching the script? Whether it’s the super admin of the application/application owner or an application specific admin?
3) Does the performance of the scripts depend on the place you are launching it from? For example - will the performance differ if it’s launched from MaxL Vs EAS?
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Thanks,
- Krrish

There are a number of bugs 12600557, 12675485, 12669814, 12698488 logged in for 11.1.2.1 - If you use Internet Explorer 8 and have data forms designed to use a large number of sparse dimension members in rows or columns, you may experience performance degradation when opening the data forms.
This has been fixed in Oracle Hyperion Planning, Fusion Edition Release 11.1.2.1 Patch Set Update (PSU): 11.1.2.1.101 which is available on My Oracle Support as Patch 12666861.
HTH-
Jasmine.

Performance suffering after upgrading from 10.4.10 to 10.4.11

I've got an 800 MHz Powerbook G4 with 1GB of ram, which I use mostly for checking email, surfing the internet, and watching videos (via S-Video out to my TV).
It has always been plenty fast for what I need to do, until I upgraded from 10.4.10 to 10.4.11. Now videos are stuttery; it's painful to even watch Youtube videos, and I can't watch Hulu videos at all. Everything is a bit slower, not just video; navigating in the finder is now somewhat sluggish, file copies take longer, etc.
Nothing other than the OS version has changed, and no other upgrade I've done has resulted in a performance decrease. I hear this is the last 10.4 update. Is there any way I can revert to 10.4.10 without reinstalling the OS entirely?

Hi dojiijii, and a warm welcome to the forums!
Ii\t appears to be time for a relatively painless Archive & Install, which gives you a new/old OS, but can preserve all your files, pics, music, settings, etc., as long as you have plenty of free disk space and no Disk corruption, and is relatively quick & painless...
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107120
Just be sure to select Preserve Users & Settings.
You could just p the 10.4.10 Combo upgradw if you desire/...
http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/apple/macosx_updates/macosx10410comboupdat eppc.html
But I think the problem is elsewhere!

Performance issue after upgradation

Dear All,
I am facing one problem, we have upgraded the existing 4.6c version to ecc 6.0 version for one of the client. And from the basis side everything is completed. But while I tried to run the z-programs in the new version i.e ecc 6.0 version it is taking long time than usual in 4.6c version. On observing the coding , the coding contains innerjoins of 4 to 5 cluster tables. Is this could be one of the reason for longtime execution or else any other reason is there. Do we need to performance tune the programs or else is there any procedure to reduce the program execution time without optimising the code.
Please help me and thankful to you all in advance
Regards
Rayasam

Did you delete the SQL packages on your system after doing the upgrade?
The existing SQL packages may no longer be appropriate, and may not be allowing the correct optimizations to occur.
Normally, the SQL packages will be deleted as a matter of course during the upgrade, but if it didn't happen for some reason, it can affect performance.
See the following, which discusses this issue:
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/ff/ff6dcb409f11d1896b0000e8322d00/content.htm">SQL Package Handling</a>
Also, even if the SQL package were deleted and rebuilt, it may take some time for the system to optimize with the new packages.
Good luck
Brian
Fix typo
Message was edited by:
Brian Sammond

Performance issues after upgrading to 11g

hello,
We are facing a performance issue after upgrading from 10g to 11g.
as you can see, the tables named APPLSYS.FND_ENV_CONTEXT has grown to 15544880 records,
and oracle is using TABLE ACCESS FULL on it:
DELETE FND_ENV_CONTEXT E
WHERE NOT EXISTS
(SELECT 'X'
FROM FND_CONCURRENT_PROCESSES P
WHERE P.CONCURRENT_PROCESS_ID = E.CONCURRENT_PROCESS_ID)
AND ROWNUM < 10000;
Plan:
DELETE STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 74,345
     5 DELETE APPLSYS.FND_ENV_CONTEXT
          4 COUNT STOPKEY
               3 HASH JOIN RIGHT ANTI Cost: 74,345 Bytes: 3,108,980 Cardinality: 155,449
                    1 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_CONCURRENT_PROCESSES_U1 Cost: 166 Bytes: 315,450 Cardinality: 63,090
                    2 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE APPLSYS.FND_ENV_CONTEXT Cost: 69,124 Bytes: 233,173,200 Cardinality: 15,544,880
select num_rows,last_analyzed from dba_tables where table_name='FND_ENV_CONTEXT'
15544880 07/07/2011 12:08:55
please advice.
Ofer

Please see these docs.
Table Fnd_env_context Growing Very Fast [ID 419990.1]
FND Related Tablespaces Growing at Rapid and Excessive Rate [ID 189800.1]
FNDCPPUR Request Does Not Always Delete Files From The File System, Many Files Will Be Denoted As "deletion failed" [ID 1335304.1]
Concurrent Processing - Best Practices for Performance for Concurrent Managers in E-Business Suite [ID 1057802.1]
Concurrent Processing - Purge Concurrent Request and/or Manager Data Program (FNDCPPUR) [ID 104282.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Battery performance worst after 5.0.1 upgrade

Battery performance worst after IOS 5.0.1 upgrade. I Did upgrade my iphone yesterday and I notice the battery has ran out faster today after 6hours in standbay and 2.30 hours of use. Hopping to get final update that fix this issue.

ok, do you have a technical support question?

Performance degradation after SP 24 installation

Hi,
Our SAP BI systems are upgraded to service pack 24. After this, we see a lot of performance degradation. (Process chains are taking time to complete in BI)
Can anybody please suggest which note to apply to avoid this?
Thx in advance.
- V Sudhakar
Edited by: sudhakar.agollu on Mar 31, 2011 12:29 AM
Edited by: sudhakar.agollu on Mar 31, 2011 12:30 AM
Edited by: sudhakar.agollu on Mar 31, 2011 12:31 AM
Edited by: sudhakar.agollu on Apr 1, 2011 3:01 AM

Hi,
Regenerate after sap system upgrade.
Run t code SGEN
Regards,
klaees

Wifi problems since 10.5.8 Update. Even after Snow Leopard Upgrade.

Wifi problems since 10.5.8 Update. Even after Snow Leopard Upgrade.
Is there any way to use a 10.5.7 wireless .kext files on Snow Leopard? And where can I find the files?

Ok, I have the fix!! After several frustrating days it finally just works.
The process:
Upgrade your Macs to 10.6 (Snow Leopard)
Powercycle your modem AND time capsule / airport TWICE
Reset your time capsule with a pin or paperclip on the back
Follow the prompts to setup your time capsule / airport access
-- On your Macs
Go to System Preferences > Network > Airport > Advanced > TCP/IP
Click "Renew DHCP Lease" then click "Ok"
Click Apply
Turn off Airport
Turn Airport on
IT WORKS!!!
One of the magical people at tech support walked me through it earlier today. The whole process took about 1.5 hrs because Show Leopard takes about an hour to install on one machine.
Hope this helps-
Joshua

My iPhone 4 has become dead slow after the iOS upgrade. Any pointers pls?

Hello All,
My iPhone 4 has become dead slow after the iOS upgrade. I use the phone for business purpose and it has become painful to use the phone becuase of the poor performance.
I don't want to change phones based on iOS releases. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Amrit

How to update my iPhone4,iOS 7.0.6

Performance Decrease with ComboBoxes

Memory consumption and bad performance decrease when closing and reopening panels containing ComboBoxes.
Context:
- Running localMode
- Jdev 9.0.3.1 DE
- Business Component Version 9.0.3.10.62
- jdk 1.3.1_02
Panel (within an JInternal frame) with some JUComboBoxes with LOV-Binding to ViewObjects, only with a few entries (2-20)
We observed, that the count of JUIteratorBindings encreases with every new Panel (re)open.
After closing the Internal Frame (including the Panel) the IteratorBindings of all ComboBoxes keep alive and a set of new ones are added to the PanelBinding when opening the (same) Panel once more.
Is it a bug?
Have one to remove the IteratorBindings explicitly?
Is there any configuration possibility, that the IteratorBindings die with the Panel?
Has anyone the same problem?
Roswitha Stepputtis

Yes, we experience similar problems. My suggestion would be to simply hide (setVisible(false)) your internal frames and reuse them when you open them again.
So, instead of dynamically re-creating your JInternalFrame instances, you keep a reference to them once they are created and reuse them each time they should be made visible. I think this will make your application more efficient as a whole.

Severe Samba performance decrease after u6 - u7 upgrade

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for