Should I modify the camera file to change the greyscale resolution of my Photonfocus camera from 8 to 12 bits?

I have some difficulties to use my Photonfocus camera with 12 bits greyscale resolution.
I have a Photonfocus camera MV-D1024E-160-CL-12, a NI PCIe-1429 frame grabber, PFRemote 2.0 and Measurement & Automation Explorer 4.2.1.3001.
If I work with 8 bits greyscale resolution (PFRemote -> Data Output: Resolution : 8 bit) and look at the image with MAX (Système -> Périphériques et interfaces -> NI-IMAQ Devices -> img0: NI PCIe-1429 -> Channel 0: PhotonFocus MV-D1024-160 (file in attachment), everything is working.
Now I'd like to work with 12 bits and I don't know exactly what I have to change? I've tried to change only the resolution in PFRemote (PFRemote -> Data Output: Resolution : 12 bit) but then the image in MAX remains a 8 bit resolution. Then I've tried also to modify the camera file (file in attachment). I've put the "BitDepth" and the "BitsPerComponent" at 12 instead of 8 and the "BinaryThreshold" to (0,4095). But when trying to grab an image in MAX, an error occured: "Error 0xBFF600FE Le nombre de bits par pixel requis est invalide".
Should I really modify the camera file in order to grab 12 bits images? Or what should I do?
Thank you
Mélanie
Attachments:
PhotonFocus MV-D1024-160.txt ‏5 KB

Hi toto26,
Thank you very much for the information. I did exactly the same thing as you suggested for 8-bit, and I were able to change the resolution (number of pixels), exposure time, frame rate without any problem. I understand that I need to coordinate the MAX icd file and the settings of PFRemote.
When I tried to switch to 12-bit, I found that I need the camera file (.icd) for 12-bit. I tried the attached icd in the previous discussion (Photonfocus MV-D1024E-160-CL-12 12-bit 1429 X4 only.zip 2 KB). There was an IMAX Error: Error 0xBFF6002C, FIFO overflow caused acquisition to halt. Then I think maybe this camera file is not good for me because I have a PCIe-1427, instead of a PCIe-1429.
So, I downloaded the camera file generator (from the same link you suggested) to create my own camera file. When I run the generator, the first window popped out was for camera setting, and there was no Photonfocus in the choice for the Manufacturer. Is it true that I cannot create camera files for Photonfocus camera, or I simply don't know how to use the generator?
Thanks again for the help and I look forward to more advices.
Regards,
Hasi

Similar Messages

How should i modify the hp54600a instrument driver for GPIB so i can use it for RS232 interface ?

I try to modify the hp54600a instrument driver for GPIB, so i can use it with RS232. But somehow it didnt work. When i try to run the initilize it, the prgoram show VISA read error (time is up before the process is finish). How should I modify the VI so I can use it with RS232 interface ?

First, check the instrument's user manual to see if the GPIB and serial command sets are the same. Also check to see what EOS(End of String) characters the instrument requires. Then, do a loopback test to test communication in LabVIEW.
Search Results: Serial Loopback Test
Ray K
NI Applications EngineerMessage Edited by Molly K on 02-18-2005 10:57 PM

Should I Get the High Resolution 17" MBP Screen

We have one designer in our firm who is a staunch PC person, but being that everyone has switched to a Mac at this point we've convinced her to try a Mac. I'm going to get her a 17" MacBook Pro, but my question is whether I should get her the higher resolution screen that is available for a few hundred dollars more. The money isn't an issue, I'm just wondering it that is cramming too many pixels in too small of a space to be usable over a regular pair of eyeballs. She does mostly web design work in DreamWeaver and related programs.

Well I am certainly very happy with my high resolution display, and I don't remember it costing that much more. I have heard people complain that they can't read mail or Safari, but it is easy enough to set large fonts in these applications to make them easier to use. And I would think that one would want the high resolution for web design and dreamweaver, although I have never done this myself. Having rather bad eyes myself, I generally wear reading glasses for long computer sessions. But I haven't really had any problems with the high resolution. I believe you can set it for a lower resolution if you like, but I really enjoy the sharpness. And if she ever uses a large external display, the high resolution will be better for that.
Elsewhere on this forum is a very lively "Matte vs. Glossy" thread you might like to look at. There's a wide variety of opinion as to which is better for the graphic artist.
Good luck!

"Date Modified" for all files being changed if "Automatically write to XMP" is on

Recently upgraded from LR3 (v3.4.1) from LR2 on OSX 10.6.8 and have always had Catalog Settings > Automatically write changes into XMP turned on.
When browsing existing JPG files in my Library (no Develop changes, no keywording, no Presets, no Import), LR3 is writing to disk — i.e., when I look at files in Finder, almost every viewed file’s “Date Modified” is being set to today’s date and time. (It actually creates a .swp file, then changes it's name back to .jpg)
This is really bad, as it's making it impossible for me to use Finder to figure out when I last worked with a file, it is triggering needless Time Machine and Backblaze backups, and unnecessarily churning my disk.
If I turn off "Automatically write..." this behavior stops. Per David Marx at thelightroomlab.com, I tried turning off this preference, manually doing a "Save Metadata to File" for all files, letting that complete, then turning the preference back on. This does not solve the problem.
Per a suggestion at photoshop.com, I used ExifTool to see what changes LR was writing to a sample file; from the diff below, you can see that LR is adding a bunch of new fields as well as moving other fields around. But my point is that LR3 should never overwrite a file on disk if all I am doing is browsing thru them.
Is anyone else seeing this? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated!
-- David
diff Exif5609_original Exif5609_update
2c2
< FileName: DSC_5609_original.JPG
> FileName: DSC_5609_update.JPG
5,6c5,6
< FileModifyDate: 2009:11:27 21:32:54-08:00
< FilePermissions: rwxr-xr-x
> FileModifyDate: 2011:08:07 22:06:47-07:00
> FilePermissions: rw-r--r--
27a28,29
> ShutterSpeedValue: 1/200
> ApertureValue: 7.1
55d56
< SerialNumber: 3209521
75d75
< Lens: 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6
185,188d184
< UserComment:
< SubSecTime: 00
< SubSecTimeOriginal: 00
< SubSecTimeDigitized: 00
211a208,299
> XMPToolkit: Adobe XMP Core 5.2-c004 1.136881, 2010/06/10-18:11:35
> CreatorTool: Ver.1.00
> MetadataDate: 2011:08:07 22:06:47-07:00
> SerialNumber: 3209521
> LensInfo: 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6
> Lens: 18.0-200.0 mm f/3.5-5.6
> ImageNumber: 26634
> RawFileName: DSC_5609.JPG
> SavedSettingsName: Import
> SavedSettingsType: Snapshot
> SavedSettingsParametersVersion: 6.4.1
> SavedSettingsParametersProcessVersion: 5.0
> SavedSettingsParametersWhiteBalance: As Shot
> SavedSettingsParametersIncrementalTemperature: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersIncrementalTint: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersExposure: 0.00
> SavedSettingsParametersShadows: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersBrightness: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersContrast: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSaturation: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSharpness: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersLuminanceSmoothing: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersColorNoiseReduction: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersChromaticAberrationR: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersChromaticAberrationB: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersVignetteAmount: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersShadowTint: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersRedHue: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersRedSaturation: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersGreenHue: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersGreenSaturation: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersBlueHue: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersBlueSaturation: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersFillLight: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersVibrance: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersHighlightRecovery: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersClarity: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersDefringe: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersHueAdjustmentRed: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersHueAdjustmentOrange: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersHueAdjustmentYellow: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersHueAdjustmentGreen: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersHueAdjustmentAqua: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersHueAdjustmentBlue: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersHueAdjustmentPurple: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersHueAdjustmentMagenta: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSaturationAdjustmentRed: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSaturationAdjustmentOrange: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSaturationAdjustmentYellow: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSaturationAdjustmentGreen: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSaturationAdjustmentAqua: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSaturationAdjustmentBlue: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSaturationAdjustmentPurple: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSaturationAdjustmentMagenta: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersLuminanceAdjustmentRed: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersLuminanceAdjustmentOrange: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersLuminanceAdjustmentYellow: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersLuminanceAdjustmentGreen: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersLuminanceAdjustmentAqua: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersLuminanceAdjustmentBlue: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersLuminanceAdjustmentPurple: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersLuminanceAdjustmentMagenta: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSplitToningShadowHue: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSplitToningShadowSaturation: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSplitToningHighlightHue: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSplitToningHighlightSaturation: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersSplitToningBalance: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersParametricShadows: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersParametricDarks: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersParametricLights: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersParametricHighlights: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersParametricShadowSplit: 25
> SavedSettingsParametersParametricMidtoneSplit: 50
> SavedSettingsParametersParametricHighlightSplit: 75
> SavedSettingsParametersSharpenRadius: +1.0
> SavedSettingsParametersSharpenDetail: 25
> SavedSettingsParametersSharpenEdgeMasking: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersPostCropVignetteAmount: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersGrainAmount: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersLensProfileEnable: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersLensManualDistortionAmount: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersPerspectiveVertical: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersPerspectiveHorizontal: 0
> SavedSettingsParametersPerspectiveRotate: 0.0
> SavedSettingsParametersPerspectiveScale: 100
> SavedSettingsParametersConvertToGrayscale: False
> SavedSettingsParametersToneCurveName: Linear
> SavedSettingsParametersCameraProfile: Embedded
> SavedSettingsParametersCameraProfileDigest: D6AF5AEA62557FCE88BC099788BBD3CC
> SavedSettingsParametersLensProfileSetup: LensDefaults
> SavedSettingsParametersToneCurve: 0, 0, 255, 255
> IPTCDigest: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
228,230d315
< SubSecCreateDate: 2009:11:27 21:32:54.00
< SubSecDateTimeOriginal: 2009:11:27 21:32:54.00
< SubSecModifyDate: 2009:11:27 21:32:54.00
http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lr3_date_modified_for_all_files_bein g_updated_when_browsing_photos_if_catalog_settings_automatically_write_changes_into_xmp_is /replies/6313647

clvrmnky wrote:
davidpope007 wrote:
Then when LR3 loaded my old LR2 images into memory, it "dirtied" the in-memory copy of the file by adding in these new LR3 XMP fields. Then, because I had "Automatically write XMP" on, it said "I better write these changes to disk".
Yuck. As a former software engineer, this is very bad software engineering.
It should wait until the user dirties the file (via Develop, keywords, etc.) before presuming to add a bunch of metadata fields that are unique to the new version of LR3.
Well, I'm a current software developer, and this is, really, a perfectly reasonable thing to do. It is a reasonable trade-off for a convenient feature required by a small subset of users.
Yes, in most cases the in-memory copy should "never" be dirtied unless the user makes a gesture of some sort, but like I said earlier, this option (once set by the user) sets up the situation where this gesture becomes implicit. This is a clear trade-off for the sake of convenience. And if the XMP is out of date and needs to be updated en masse, so be it.
The fact is, there is no easy way around this. Do we save up /every/ dirty buffer somehow until you make a gesture that /might/ require the XMP to be up-to-date before acting on that gesture? Now we have to worry about unflushed buffers if something goes wrong and the app exits. Do we save the buffers to the DB? Now we have to block some calls to make another blocking call to flush some or all of those to DB, and then write some or all of it out to one or more files. In what order? What if there is a gesture to have X files with up-to-date XMP and some or all of those are in unflushed buffers, unflushed DB writes or we have to wait for the DB.
As you can see, this is a transactionality nightmare, and the easiest and safest thing to get what the user wants (i.e., up-to-date XMP for the purpose of talking to a third-party XMP aware app) is to simply update the sidecar or XMP block in an atomic manner using the correct file IO. The file will have to change at some point, so it may as well be now.
[Thanks to both of you for your detailed replies. I am aware of the need for tradeoffs so when you say the approach taken is quite reasonable, I do believe you. I also apologize in advance for the length of the following and am extremely aware of the time it must have taken you to compose the above replies, but I'm going to add a bit more, if only for my own piece of mind and in hopes of coming up with a solution for my workflow.]
From my naive point of view, I was expecting the answer to be simply "don't raise the XMPDirtyFlag upon reading in a file". Obviously if your architecture requires you to "upgrade to latest XMP format" upon read, and another part of the system auto-detects "out of date XMP", then it's going to write those changes to disk.
But it didn't need to be designed that way. LR obviously has mechanisms to know when a user has made a change to XMP so it is able to write XMP changes to disk only when necessary.
The promise (to me) of "Automatically Write XMP changes to disk" was to auto-save my changes, and not those made for any internal (i.e., XMP versioning related) changes.
Perhaps the premise is that it is LR3's job to update an individual file's XMP to the latest version so that other XMP-aware apps can make use of it? I would argue that those third-party XMP-aware apps already have to know how to deal with all prior versions of XMP, so LR3 should just leave well enough alone.
You asked if my problem with your approach was that it was "inelegant"; not at all, it is based on my own perception of what I need from my workflow, so let me describe that so maybe we can find a better way:
* Part of the appeal of LR to me is that it preserves my original file as it came off the memory card, allowing me to move to a different workflow/toolset in 2025 if I choose to do so
* However, with all of changes contained in a single database file, I'm concerned about rare (but possible) corruption, so to mitigate this risk, I let LR backup my database weekly and it's also backed up continuously in the cloud via Backblaze
* Even with backups of the database, there is still a chance that I could lose changes made to individual files (e.g., LR corrupts the DB and I have to go back to last week's DB)
* Thus the appeal of the "auto-write to XMP" flag -- that way critical changes (develop, crop, keywords) are saved on a per-file basis; I liked the "automatic" part of this (as opposed to a manual save) because then I don't have to teach others in my family how to manually save XMP changes
* A nice side-effect of this setting is now when I use Finder to find a file and double-click on it to edit it in Photoshop, all my develop changes are right there; (in other words, I like the flexibility of not having to fire up LR in order to just invoke PS from within it); also when I use Bridge I see all the keywords there
* So with LR2, I had gotten used to what I thought was the best of all worlds -- autosave of changes at the file level via XMP + raw negatives untouched (i.e., Date Modified == the date I took the picture); this allows me to use operating-system-level tools -- Finder -- to locate/search for files
* Now I upgrade to LR3 and I'm finally now understanding that a concept "XMP versioning" is going to result in changes to many, but not all my files. (That's something else that's annoying about this issue -- I open up the Grid and browse a folder of files, and only seemingly random ones I've cursored over seem to get written to disk -- if it's so urgent that LR3 update the XMP, then it should do it for all the files in the catalog or at least in that directory)
Here's a screenshot from Finder of what I see everytime I look at this folder:
* So now I have to assume that each new version of XMP and/or LR is going to touch my files on disk. Sigh.
* What I don't like about this is that it is ruining the promise of "untouched raw negative". Yes, the image data is untouched -- which I agree is most of the benefit; but the file has been touched.
* Perhaps you might empathize a bit more if you imagined that someone went thru all your source code or Word files and randomly changed the date to "today" because you upgraded compilers or moved to Word 2011.
I agree all of this would be solved by having an XMP sidecar file for JPGs, but you indicate that's not going to happen.
You've also alluded to the solution of "resetting the Date Modifed" to it's original value -- which I believe is what Finder does when you move or copy a file -- but that that is fraught with issues as well. I believe you when you say there are issues, but again the naive part of me wonders why that soultion would be so bad...
I just thought of another potential solution -- turning on Date Created in Finder -- but it turns out that's changed, too.
I am really at a loss as to what to do and would welcome your suggestions.
Thanks again and kind regards,
-- David

PrepareDomain should it modify the Domain Controller Policy?

I have Exchange 2010 installed with two servers in a DAG. I recently ran into a problem were two of the domain controllers were down and had to reboot both Exchange servers. Exchange would not come back online because of the missing SACL right
on the other domain controllers.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/richardroddy/archive/2010/06/16/msexchange-adaccess-dsaccess-errors-and-the-manage-auditing-and-security-right.aspx
I went ahead and ran exchange "setup /preparedomain" and I was able to get my DAG running again but when I check the "Default Domain Controllers Policy" it is not modified to allow the "Exchange Servers" group manage auditing
and security log like I would expect it to. There are no errors but it only modified the local domain controller policy. So I would have to run this on every domain controller.

Hi,
According to your description, it seems like DC replication issue.
I recommend you refer to the follwoing article to force sync manually:
Force Replication Between Domain Controllers
You can use this procedure to force Active Directory replication to occur between two domain controllers on a one-time basis when you want changes to be replicated from the server that received the changes to a server in another site sooner than the
site link schedule allows. As an alternative, you can synchronize replication with all replication partners.
Thanks.
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Should I get the high resolution display?

I'm getting a new MacBook Pro and I don't know if I should get the high resolution screen. Is it really worth it? Does it make the display really better? I've heard some people actually prefer the regular display to the high resolution one. Should I go ahead and get it or not?

As the other response says, you should really go to a store and see for yourself. I first moved from a 13" 1024x768 laptop to a 15" 1400x1050 screen years ago sight unseen, and I was quite happy with it. A few years after that, I went to a ThinkPad running 1600x1200 and was still quite happy. Now, I have a 17" MacBook Pro running 1920x1200 and I love it. It is my desktop replacement system (even though I moved to dedicated notebooks over 15 years ago). I have no trouble reading my screen and love how much I can fit on the screen at one time. I have talked to many others who would rather (and some do) run their 22" external LCD monitors at 1440x900 rather than their rated 1680x1050. It is all up to you and how well you can read the screen.

Modifying the cell content based on input parameter from variable screen.

I am trying to modify a cell content in the BEX Web Application Report based on the input parameter from the variable screen.
I am already aware of how to change the cell content by creating a new ABAP class and inheriting CL_RSR_WWW_MODIFY_TABLE.
I do not know how to get the input parameter variable from the variable screen in my custom class ZCL_RSR_WWW_MODIFY_TABLE. I am not very familiar with ABAP and would appreciate your help.
Thanks
Sowmini

in the start method
define a work area like line of n_r_data_set->N_SX_VERSION_20A_1-TXT_SYMBOLS
loop at n_r_data_set->N_SX_VERSION_20A_1-TXT_SYMBOLS into <wa> ..
endloop .
This will have all the filter, variable values entered in the selection.
Regards
Raja

PLEASE make PS CS6 open RED R3D movie files through Camera Raw 7 as 16 bit/channel files

Hi All,
Why does CS6 Photoshop only open Red R3D movies files as 8 bits per channel ???
This is VERY disappointing , R3D movies should be opened through Camera Raw 7 as 16 bits per channel
Hey Adobe please, Please, PLEASE make this very desirable change
Many thanks
Steve

Hi Chris,
Thanks for the prompt reply. I understand what you are suggesting however in CS6 PS when I open a Red R3D file (on my windows machine)
photoshop opens the file as 8 bit/ch WITHOUT going through ACR, not offering the option of opening it as a 16 bit file in ACR.
I presume PS "thinks" the R3D file is just 8 bit and doesn't "know" to start up Camera Raw 7 to allow opening it as a 16 bit file
No easy fix I'm guessin' ?
Many thanks
All the best
Steve

IPhoto file names changed

I have just noticed that in several of my events the underlying file name of several imported photos has been changed to my assigned Title. Since I didn't think Apple provided a way in iPhoto for Mac to change the file name, and I am not digging into the file structure of iPhoto, I can't change the file name back to that assigned by the camera (and I don't necessarily know it anyway). I see no obvious reason why specific file names were changed. Is there some non-obvious way to change file names that I accidentally stumble upon?

iPhoto 9.4.3. Not sure what you mean by history. It has been in use for some time. No other obvious problems. The file name changes, at least that I have noticed, are from this year and, in particular, this past week. One other observation is that I only happened to notice because I exported a group of photos and saw that a few of the exported names did not have the camera assigned names and then I looked back at iPhoto (hovering the cursor over the title - which gives the file name). Again, the files were exported as a group and no obvious reason for something to change for one rather than another file. It is possible the change took place when I exported the photos rather than earlier as I had no reason to check.

Modifying the DisplayShelf sample to load images from a database

Hi,
I've been programming java for a couple of years but it's my first try at JavaFX and I feel completely lost.
I am trying to modify the DisplayShelf sample to get image paths from a mysql database instead of loading the sample images in the jar.
I created a class called ImagePaths with a single method called getPaths() that returns an array of String paths. I tested it and it works.
Now following is the modification I did to DisplayShelf's class:
I replaced the images array declaration with:
var ip = new ImagePaths();
var images = ip.getPaths();and later
var shelf:DisplayShelf;
shelf = DisplayShelf {
    spacing: 50
    scaleSmall: 0.7
    leftOffset: -110
    rightOffset: 110
    perspective: true
    content: bind for(i in images) {
        var item:Item = Item {
            angle: 45
            position: indexof i - half
            image:Image{backgroundLoading: true, url:{i}}
            shelf: bind shelf
        item;
    }I replaced code based on intuition. Maybe I should have started with a hello world but please can you tell me what's wrong this code? I'm completely clueless.
Regards,
William.

You code looks correct. If you print out the paths what do you get? What is the format of the paths?

How to change the width for adf shuttle without modify the skin file

Dear Professionals
I haven an ADF Shuttle component in my jsp screen , How can i change the width for the two boxes without modify the skin files.(I know i can do that by skin but what i want to change one shuttle just in one screen not change all shuttles on other screens).
Regards
Wish79

Okay, I didnt try with the trinidad selectmanyshuttle, but this worked for me on the af:selectmanyshuttle..
        <af:selectManyShuttle label="Label 1" styleClass="mycustcss">
          <af:selectItem label="Label1" value="value1"/>
          <af:selectItem label="Label2" value="value2"/>
        </af:selectManyShuttle>
        <af:selectManyShuttle label="Label 1">
          <af:selectItem label="Label1" value="value1"/>
          <af:selectItem label="Label2" value="value2"/>
        </af:selectManyShuttle>        And in my css file, I have
af|selectManyShuttle.mycustcss::content { width: 800.0px;}
The first selectManyShuttle came up very wide and the second one came up in the default width..
Julian.

Is it wise to keep the Nikon camera files "DSC's" after downloading them and converting to DNG files via Adobe converter for lightroom use. In other words do the DNG files have all the raw data I would ever need in processing or should I save the camera'

Is it wise to keep the Nikon camera files "DSC's" after downloading them and converting to DNG files via Adobe converter for lightroom use. In other words do the DNG files have all the raw data I would ever need in processing or should I save the camera's DSC files?

DNG files do not contain some metadata supplied by the camera, which can be used by the manufacturer's software. Thus, if you don't keep the original Raw photo, you will lose this information.
If your 1000% sure you're never going to use the manufacturer's software, then this isn't a problem. But who can be sure what software you will be using 10 years from now?

Whenever I modify a photo in Iphoto it puts it in a "modified" subfolder. Why can't I move this modified file (I changed name) back to the Iphoto main file so I can see it when I open my photos?

Whenever I modify a photo in Iphoto it puts it in a "modified" subfolder. Why can't I move this modified file (I changed and saved file name) back to the Iphoto main file so I can see it when I open my photos?

A good general step for strange issues is to renew the iPhoto preference file - quit iPhoto and go to "your user name" ==> library ==> preferences ==> com.apple.iPhoto.plist and trash it - launch iPhoto which creates a fresh new default preference file and reset any personal preferences you have changed and if you have moved the iPhoto library repoint to it. This may help
This does not affect your photos or any database information (keywords, faces, places, ratings, etc) in any way - they are stored in the iPhoto library - the iPhoto preference file simply controls how iPhoto works - which is why renewing it is a good first step.
If that does not cure it backup up your iPhoto library and rebuild it - depress the option and command keys and launch iphoto and use the options there - exact option depends on teh version you have
And always remember - NEVER make any changes of any sort to the structure or content of the iPhoto library - nothing - no deletions - no name changes - nothing
LN

When I try to open a bookmark I get a box that says "what should firefox do with this file?" When I try to change the "open with Internet Explorer" I can't find firefox ? Last week this bookmark worked fine.

When I open a bookmark a box pops up that says "What should firefox do with this file? "open with Internet Explorer? When I browse I can't find firefox to change to. Last week this book mark worked perfectly.

Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode]] to check if one of your add-ons is causing your problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Tools > Add-ons > Themes).
See [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] and [[Troubleshooting plugins]]
If it does work in Safe-mode then disable all your extensions and then try to find which is causing it by enabling one at a time until the problem reappears.
You can use "Disable all add-ons" on the ''Safe mode'' start window.
You have to close and restart Firefox after each change via "File > Exit" (on Mac: "Firefox > Quit")

When I save a site after I modify the file the changes do not show up in my upload file.

When I save a site after I modify the file the changes do not show up in my upload file. What am I doing wrong?

Start here:
iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch: Device not recognized in iTunes for Windows

Should I modify the camera file to change the greyscale resolution of my Photonfocus camera from 8 to 12 bits?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for