Shrink-to-fit browser differences

The following code illustrates a shrink-to-fit (shrink-wrap) difference between browsers. All my Mac browsers shrink the yellow area as intended if the browser window is wide enough to allow the red, green and blue boxes to be on one line. However, if I reduce the window width to force one or two of these boxes onto other lines Camino 1.6.9 and IE 5.2.3 continue to shrink-to-fit but Firefox 3.5.2, Safari 4.0.3 and iCab 4.5 fill the brown box with yellow. Can anybody tell me what to do to get Firefox, Safari and iCab to shrink-to-fit as intended? Please see my demonstration page at: http://links.open.ac.uk/www/shrink-wrap/
<div style='overflow: auto; background: brown'>
<div style='float: left; margin: 10px; background: yellow'>
<div style='float: left; margin: 10px; width: 300px; height: 100px; background: red'></div>
<div style='float: left; margin: 10px; width: 300px; height: 100px; background: green'></div>
<div style='float: left; margin: 10px; width: 300px; height: 100px; background: blue'></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style='float: left; margin: 20px; width: 300px; height: 100px; background: purple'></div>

I have rewritten my page at http://links.open.ac.uk/www/shrink-wrap/ and would appreciate any constructive comments.

Similar Messages

  • Shrink to  fit page doesn't work

    Hi. I have a complex program which is doing the following.
    Java program calling c++ executable by using "Process" object which is using Win API interface to start new process eg: "c:\PathTo Adobe executable /p /h c:\myPdf.pdf". The document's margins are very close to document's edges, so if I want to print this document normally I use "shrink to page". But the documet printed without shrinking!!!
    When I an opening the same document just inside Acrobat and send it to print, it is printed normally, when I am executing only c++ executable it is printed shinked.
    I tryed it in Acrobat 7,8,9 with the same result.
    Moreover on other PC it is printed shrinked, when executing the whole process I described above!!!
    What can be a problem. It seems to be that Adobe loosing "shrink to fit" settings

    Try disabling the "resume from crash" option.
    # Type '''about:config''' into the locaiton bar and press enter
    # Accept the warning message that appears, this will take you to a list of preferences
    # In the filter box type '''crash'''
    # Double-click on the preference browser.sessionstore.resume_from_crash to change its value to false
    If you are always getting this message, it indicates Firefox may be crashing when you close it, this may be caused by a problematic add-on, for help twith that see [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] and [[Firefox crashes]].

  • Overcoming browser differences

    Is there a general tutorial on how to overcome browser
    differences?
    Hi All,
    Can anyone point me at a tutorial (or book) which
    systematically deals
    with techniques for coping with different browsers
    interpreting the same
    css and html code differently.
    I find myself increasingly frustrated and helpless when
    fixing something
    for one browser (e.g. Mozilla, Seamonkey etc) and finding it
    looks a
    mess in IE, and when I fix it in IE, it does not work in
    Mozilla etc.
    Acute example, where I need help (but I do not want to keep
    coming back):
    www.brookfield-park-pri.lancs.sch.uk/shell/contents/prospectus/prospectus/prospectus.html
    To see the current disgrace look at the above, then search
    for
    'Galileo'. Perfect fit in Seamonkey, a mess in IE.
    In IE the absolute positioning is different from Seamonkey,
    also
    padding-top in the 'Mathematics' quote differs.
    This was handled by an in-line style:
    <div id="Mathematics" class="bright_area"
    style="position:absolute;
    width:300px; height:80px; padding: 0em 0em 2em 1.5em;
    z-index:3;
    left: 404px; top: 9608px;">
    <p class="normal_red">Mathematics is the language
    <br>
    in which God wrote the universe</p>
    <p class="normal_red">Galileo (1564 &ndash;
    1642)</p>
    </div>
    The stylesheet is at the following address:
    www.brookfield-park-pri.lancs.sch.uk/shell/stylesheets/brookfield.css
    Thanks for your help.
    Adrian

    Hi Joe, thank you, that explanation was really useful and I
    hope I have
    properly implemented it.
    I could not change the margins of class img_left because that
    would have
    affected lots of other images on the site, but I took care of
    that with
    an in-line style.
    I did get rid of the divs with position absolute, and that
    solved most
    of the problems.
    However, something remains.
    Could please look again at:
    www.brookfield-park-pri.lancs.sch.uk/shell/contents/prospectus/prospectus/prospectus.html
    The stylesheet is at the following address:
    www.brookfield-park-pri.lancs.sch.uk/shell/stylesheets/brookfield.css
    FIND 'galileo'. The image of the two touching hands is
    positioned OK in
    Seamonkey (with margin: 13.5 em), but in IE it is a couple of
    ems too
    far to the right. Whatever I do, I cannot get it right in
    both browsers.
    If I reduce margin-left from 13.5 ems to 13.0 em, the image
    in IE is
    hardly affected, whereas in Seamonkey it moves too far to the
    left.
    Does this have something to do with browser interpretation?
    If you go down to the next image (Science, Professor
    Greenfield),
    <p><div class="bright_area"
    style="margin: -30px 0px 0px 220px;
    width: 300px; height: 170px;
    padding: 5px 0px 0px 15px; ">
    I have the text in the grey area (div) more or less where I
    want it in
    Seamonkey, having given the div padding-top: 5px,
    but in IE there is not enough padding on top of the text.
    As I gradually move padding-top up from 5px to 8px, Seamonkey
    responds,
    but IE does not seem to respond at all.
    What is the solution?
    Thanks for your help.
    Adrian
    Joe Makowiec wrote:
    > On 22 Sep 2007 in macromedia.dreamweaver, Adrian Stock
    wrote:
    >
    >> Is there a general tutorial on how to overcome
    browser differences?
    >>
    >> Hi All,
    >>
    >> Can anyone point me at a tutorial (or book) which
    systematically
    >> deals with techniques for coping with different
    browsers
    >> interpreting the same css and html code differently.
    >>
    >> I find myself increasingly frustrated and helpless
    when fixing
    >> something for one browser (e.g. Mozilla, Seamonkey
    etc) and finding
    >> it looks a mess in IE, and when I fix it in IE, it
    does not work in
    >> Mozilla etc.
    >>
    >> Acute example, where I need help (but I do not want
    to keep coming
    >> back):
    >>
    >>
    www.brookfield-park-pri.lancs.sch.uk/shell/contents/prospectus/prospe
    >> ctus/prospectus.html
    >>
    >> To see the current disgrace look at the above, then
    search for
    >> 'Galileo'. Perfect fit in Seamonkey, a mess in IE.
    >>
    >> In IE the absolute positioning is different from
    Seamonkey, also
    >> padding-top in the 'Mathematics' quote differs.
    >
    > Actually, try resizing the text in a Mozilla-based
    browser (like
    > Seamonkey) - it's broken there, too.
    >
    > The problem in this case isn't browser differences, it's
    a fundamental
    > misunderstanding of how web development works. You're
    trying to
    > position that information absolutely in the middle of a
    whole bunch of
    > relatively-positioned stuff. When the
    relatively-positioned stuff
    > moves, as it will due to changes in font size, the
    absolutely
    > positioned stuff stays put and winds up out of place.
    (Different
    > browsers have slightly different concepts of what font
    size is, which
    > is why you're seeing the difference between IE and
    Moz-based browsers.
    > I suspect that if you checked in Safari or Camino, you'd
    have the
    > same problem.)
    >
    > Try this and see if it doesn't suit your purpose better:
    >
    > <h2>Mathematics</h2>
    > <div id="Michelangelo" style="width:550px;margin:0
    auto;padding:10px;border:1px solid #333;background-color:#fff;">
    <img
    src="images_prospectus/galileo_01_justus_sustermans_sm_200x245.jpg"
    alt="Galileo, painted by Justus Sustermans" width="200"
    height="245" class="img_left">
    > <div style="margin-left:250px;">
    > <p class="normal_red">Mathematics is the language
    <br>
    > in which God wrote the universe</p>
    > <p class="normal_red">Galileo (1564 &ndash;
    1642)</p>
    > <img
    src="images_prospectus/michelangelo_creation_of_adam_01.jpg"
    alt="Detail from 'The Creation of Adam'" width="150"
    height="55">
    > </div>
    > <br style="clear:both;line-height:0;">
    > </div>
    >
    > What you don't see in the code snippet is that I've also
    changed the
    > margins in the .img_left class to 0.
    >
    > The div's position is now relative (the default if you
    don't specify),
    > which means that it will always come after the
    'Mathematics' headline
    > in the flow of the document. It has a fixed width and
    margins are set
    > to 0 auto (top/bottom - left/right), which means that it
    will center.
    > The stuff which goes to the right of the picture has its
    own div, with
    > a left margin sufficient to clear the image. (Because
    the image is
    > floated, the margin has to be from the contining div,
    not the image.)
    > Finally, the last <br> tag clears the float, so
    that the containing
    > div goes all the way past the picture of Galileo.
    >

  • I have an 10x14" InDesign image that I'd like to shrink to fit within a 8.5x11 printed document.

    I have an 10"x14" InDesign image that I'd like to shrink to fit within a 8.5"x11" printed document (using InDesign) without losing the quality of the image (especially on print). What is the correct/least destructive process to do this?
    And how is it that you can view different image sizes on Flickr (of the same image) and it doesn't seem to effect the quality of the image?
    I have tried saving/exporting the InDesign image as an EPS file, then opening the file in Photoshop, adjusting the size to my liking, saving it as a Photoshop file, then placing that file in a new InDesign document, and the image comes up distorted looking/pixelated even with my screen zoomed at 100%. I've also tried this same process with exporting it as a PDF file instead of an EPS file with the same distorted/pixelated results.
    Help!?!?!  Thank you in advance!!
    Linds10m

    I am assuming you are in InDesign CS5:
    Change your InDesign Document Size, but before you do this you must make sure the "Enable Layout Adustment" is on.
    Under: Layout/Layout Adjustment/Check the "Enable Layout Adjustment" box is checked and adjust Snap Zone.
    ALSO: Make sure your horizontal and vertical margins touches your live area.
    Then you can change size of document

  • Shrink to fit for microsoft word

    How to find and use 'Shrink To Fit' in Microsoft Word for mac. I have seen a few answers to this, but, none seem to grasp what 'Shrink To Fit' is. Shrink to fit allows the user to take one or more pages and shrink the content of those pages onto one page and sometimes just fewer pages. It does not as is indicated by many answers require the user to reduce  fonts or letter sizes manually or reformat the page. It simply shrinks or resizes the area over which the document is spread. For example, I have one and a half pages of printing but I want it all to reduce to one page for easy reading. For anyone who has used Microsoft WORD on a PC they understand 'Shrink To Fit' is achieved by clicking one button from the ribbon. Is this function completely missing from WORD for apple computers?

    If you want answers on Microsoft's products, go to their forums -  http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/mac/forum/macword

  • Acro 8 Pro won't Shrink or Fit to Printable Area

    I have drawings that originated in AutoCAD that were saved to PDF on 24x36 sheets. I want to shrink or fit them to the printable area on 11x17,but no matter what options I check it prints the upper left portion of the origianl at full scale.
    Using Acrobat 8 Pro to print to an HP 5550dn.
    Printing works as expected when done from a machine with Acrobat 7.
    What the heck is going on?

    I have the same printer, an HP Color Laser Jet 5550dn. I am having the same/similar issue as you are. The shrink to printable area / fit to printable area option does not seem to work. If I manually input a scale that I beleive will work, it prints fine.
    Apparently the options previously mentioned are not being translated to the printer properly.
    For more info on my similar problem, you can read my original thread by searching my user name. I have only one thread posted.
    A quick fix is to input the scale manually, but I'm still searching for a permanent solution.

  • Shrink-To-Fit Not Working

    HP Officejet 5610 All-In-One printer running windows XP. When I try to print a web page and click on the "Shrink-To-Fit" option it does not work. I checked for updated drivers and none are available. Anyone been able to solve this problem>

    I also have this problem where I used to be able to shrink a 2 page doc to a single page. Since upgrade to FF4 it no longer works - but you can choose say 60% and it will work. All used to work fine in FF3

  • Prevent Column Shrinking when Resizing Browser

    Hi,
    I'm designing a site with tables and I want to prevent the columns within the tables from shrinking when the browser is resized.
    Please reference the below code of two tables.
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
    <title>Untitled Document</title>
    </head>
    <body>
    <table width="520" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="10" align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> </td>
        <td align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">this column does not resize but the table is aligned left.</td>
        <td width="10" align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> </td>
      </tr>
    </table>
    <P align=left>
    <table width="100%" height="10" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" margin-top:="margin-top:" "0px" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
      <tr>
        <td> </td>
        <td width="10" align="left" valign="top"> </td>
        <td width="500" align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">This column I want to prevent from shrinking in a browser</td>
        <td width="10" align="left" valign="top"> </td>
        <td> </td>
      </tr>
    </table>
    </body>
    </html>

    Liquid Layouts = % based.  Resizes to browser viewport.
    Example: http://alt-web.com/TEMPLATES/3-col-liq-layout.shtml
    Semi-Liquid Layouts = % based plus min- and max-width restrictions.
    Example:  http://alt-web.com/TEMPLATES/3-col-semi-liq-layout.shtml
    Fixed width Layouts = pixel based.
    Example:  http://alt-web.com/TEMPLATES/3-col-white-gray.shtml
    Elastic Layouts = em based. Re-sizes entire layout based on inc/dec text size.
    Example:  http://alt-web.com/TEST/Resizable-ems-test.html
    CSS:
    body {
    width: 1000px; /**width in %, px or em*/
    margin:0 auto; /** with width, this centers page on screen**/
    Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    Web | Graphics | Print | Media  Specialists 
    http://alt-web.com/
    http://twitter.com/altweb

  • IOS 7 wallpaper unable to shrink and fit ...

    IOS 7 unable to shrink and fit, this is horrible when i use my old wallpaper...
    Please fix this bug, i can careless about the parallax ****,just want my wall paper back to normal!!!

    Have you tried pinching inwards?
    Regards,
    Steve

  • N8 Anna browser differences / issues?

    A couple of things I've noticed since the Anna upgrade, WRT the browser.
    1. When entering text in text windows for some forum posts (it actually works correctly on this forum, but on others I read / post to) the newline button doesn't add a line break. It did using the browser in PR1.2, can't remember the behaviour in PR1.1.
    2. When using the PR1.2 browser, I used to double tap on the screen to zoom, which worked very well. This seems to work quite differently in Anna.
    Both are notable issues / irritations for me. I suspect 1 is a big / issue - whether 2 is expected or planned behaviour, or not, though I'm unsure.
    Truth be told, I've not found anything hugely positive about the upgrade to Anna - all it's brought me is irritations in the differences or things that work differently. Performance and stability seem the same to me - which is to say that it's been good before and after Anna. The difference in look and feel just makes me feel meh. I don't mean to be overly critical, I kind of expected more from it, really.
    My N8 (admittedly this is my 2nd - first encountered the bug where it won't charge, nor turn on) has been well behaved, performs well and is stable. Main irritations have been with things like WiFi access being, well, unreliable and flakey - and seemed to be best served with scanning turned off, and WiFi power saving on. Post Anna, that hasn't improved, WiFi is still flakey, and not fully reliable (and there is context, there, I've got plenty of other WiFi devices that are stable, including other mobile phones).
    Photo viewer no longer picks up on all my photos any more since Anna (I'd have to move other folders, that worked just fine before Anna). Browser I've not found any benefits, and merely negatives. Portrait qwerty  means nothing to me, as I find the landscape one tricky enough to get key presses accepted accurately. Video player seems no better (still no bookmark facility).
    3.06 of maps seems the golden release - every beta since has been awful, one way or another - too much removed or configuration options removed, and the app dumbed down (3.08 betas). I've tried 3.07 and both 3.08 releases and in all 3 cases have reverted to 3.06 once I became sufficiently irritated that functionality that I wanted or wanted to configure better had either been removed, or was no longer configurable.
    Not sure what's going on with N8 software, but I'm considering imposing a software freeze on myself, because it seems that newer releases are doing nothing more than irritating me in not addressing things that need addressing, and merely tweaking look and feel, and dumbing everything down to make it less of a well usable device.

    laffcarl wrote:
    Well put
    Another Browser issue entering text into forums, that has stopped me using one of the only sites I used to frequent before 'AnnaUpdate!', has the strange effect of sending a line of 'Question marks and maybe the odd square box? (Have tried all font settings)
    Also the ?'s and square boxes don't add up to the characters in the message i.e.. a 50 character message will be sent as may be 10 ?'s or sometimes just a few. The annoying thing about it is, it looks fine before and as you send it, but when you look at the message you have sent it's as described and rather sinister looking for the recipient lol.
    One step Forward-Three steps Back!...dont even start going on about the flash player lmho...What I need is to be able to butcher the N8's camera into my old N95 then there would be no problems
    £400 odd quid for a 12 meg nokia camera, you can get an SLR for that money....But hey wait..."You can't browse the web with an SLR!!"...Oh it's OK, you can't browse it with Nokias Flagship either lmao
    *Shakes head in disbelief*
    Here's the thing - I'm not a hater - I'm not just looking to bash Nokia. Personally, I'm drawn to their handsets because for me, OVI / Nokia maps is a killer app for me.
    All the same, though, and it does really irritate - key things people have been complaining about, still not fixed. Basic functions that people have been wanting from various normal apps not implemented. Yet Anna looks a bit more funky.
    Same with the mapping betas - well actually worse - 3.06 for me seems to work very well - practically all the key things working quite well. Not perfect, and certainly could be enhanced.
    But the recent betas have been awful - ripped out functionality, removed configuration options, dumbed down functions - but again, it looks more funky. But it all just leaves me with a big "So what?". The newer versions simply don't work as well, are not as capable, and all with some dogmatic opinions expressed as the rationale behind why some things have been removed, some options removed, and some bugs not addressed.
    If they'd just focus on getting the stuff that doesn't work well, to work, in the process not remove good features or configuration options that many will want to use, THEN - if they have the time - update the visuals, then fine. But I'm sick and tired with the focus on form over function - it's making me question my entire reason for sticking with Nokia handsets - their mapping app - and I don't want to be told that mapping on phones is due a paradigm shift - I just want it to work well, with the maps updatable and relevant.

  • Resizing images in a div to fit browser width

    i have a page with rollovers in a DIV:
    http://toddheymandirector.com/REEL/index_newlook.html
    i want the the images, "nike the getaway", etc, to resize to fit the browser window width. i tried putting them in a div and adding
    row {
        max-width: 100%;
        height: auto;
        width: auto\9; /* ie8 */
    but it didnt work..
    ideas?
    thanks

    You could try something like the below. Basically it will show a maximum of 4 images per row (25%) so:
    if your image width is 300px, for the browser to view all 4 at 100% their window needs to be 1200px wide
    if their browser window is smaller than 1200px, the images will start to move onto new rows
    if the browser window is bigger than 1200px, it will scale the 4 up to fit the width.
    You can change the width of the images to match your optimal browser window and/or change the percentages to see the effect it has.
    Eg, if you remove the "min-width:25%;" from #gallery ul li it will not scale the images at all. If you change "min-width:25%;" to "width:25%;", it will always show 4 images in a row and scale up or down to fit the window.
    Best thing to do is play around until you're happy. Good luck.
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
    <title>Untitled Document</title>
    <style type="text/css">
    body{
        background-color:#666666;
        margin:0;
        padding:0;
    #container{
        width:100%;
        height:auto;
        margin:0;
        padding:0;
    #title{
        width:100%;
        float:left;
        color:#FFFFFF;
        font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
        font-size:140%;
        line-height:150%;
        margin-bottom:30px;
        text-align:center;
    #gallery{
        width:100%;
        height:auto;
        margin:0;
        padding:0;
        float:left;
    #gallery ul{
        width:100%;
        height:auto;
        margin:0;
        padding:0;
        float:left;
        background-color:#666666;
        list-style-type:none;
    #gallery ul li{
        min-width:25%;
        display:block;
        margin:0;
        padding:0;
        float:left;
        background-color:#666666;
    img{
        display:block;
        border:none;
        margin:0;
        padding:0;
        width:100%;
    </style>
    </head>
    <body>
    <div id="container">
    <div id="title">This is a floating web gallery</div>
    <div id="gallery">
    <ul>
    <li><img src="nike.png" /></li>
    <li><img src="nike.png" /></li>
    <li><img src="nike.png" /></li>
    <li><img src="nike.png" /></li>
    <li><img src="nike.png" /></li>
    <li><img src="nike.png" /></li>
    <li><img src="nike.png" /></li>
    <li><img src="nike.png" /></li>
    <li><img src="nike.png" /></li>
    </ul>
    </div>
    </div>
    </body>
    </html>

  • Scale website to fit browser width

    Hi I'm new to Muse.
    There is something i have been trying to do, but can't make it work.
    I know about the possibility of full screen and 100% width slideshows. But that is not exactly it.
    What I can't figure out is how to make a website that fits and scales with the browser width (scalable). Is that possible in Muse?
    Something like this. I have found this as a reference, perhaps it can help explain what I mean.
    http://2xelliott.co.uk/

    What you are looking for is called 'Responsive' Design. This is not currently an option in Muse however you can easily create tablet and phone versions of your site.

  • Is there a way for rollover hotspots to adjust on an image that scales to fit browser?

    Hi,
    This is my website currently: paddyohara.co.uk
    The main rollover image on my homepage is currently a fixed size, but when I set the image to expand to fit the browser, the rollover hotspots moved out of position on large screen resolutions. Is there any way to get the rollover hotspots to size up relative to the image sizing up?
    I hope this makes sense, any help much appreciated
    Paddy

    You could try something like this (I have not because I so rarely use hotspots) -
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19671168/how-to-adjust-the-top-left-width-height-based- on-the-ratio-of-the-resized-image

  • How do I resize my flash to fit browser? Help plz

    Yes I searched but none of the answers I saw made any sense so how do I make my flash fit any browser? like I made it 1280x800 to fit mine and then how do I make it fit a bigger or small one eg. 1800x1200?

    There's is a way to do it? Flash Builder?
    Basicaly, this is what i want: www.parasuco.com (resize the browser to see!)
    Thanks!

  • How to scale to fit browser zoom setting...

    So I've created my first SWF using Flash Catalyst; seems to work great.
    But I would like for it to zoom with the browser's zoom setting.
    When I view the SWF with the viewer it lets me fit-to-screen, zoom-in, etc.  So seems like I'm just missing something in the HTML maybe?
    I tried adding the param scale set to showall, or exactfit, but no go.
    Any help is appreciated.
    thanks,
    -h

    Try in [http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config about:config]
    and change [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Zoom.maxPercent zoom.maxPercent]
    type in the address bar '''about:config'''
    then press the button '''i'll be careful i promise'''
    then type in the bar '''zoom.maxPercent'''
    then '''right-click''' on it, select''' modify''', type a value greater than the current(i can't tell specific because i don't known how zoom you want), click '''OK,'''
    exit firefox and restart-it.
    see also: [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Zoom.minPercent Zoom.minPercent]
    thank you
    Please mark "Solved" the answer that really solve the problem, to help others with a similar problem.

Maybe you are looking for

  • HOW TO DESIGN A RPD .. PLS HELP

    I am new to OBI - I want to understand the methodology to design a RDP - I have gone through the ORACLE BY EXPAMPLE set avaible, it was really helpful , but still want some experts suggestion on HOW TO DESIGN THE BUSINESS AND PRESENTAION LAYER - How

  • In car charger for Lumia 1020.

    Is there anything available bar the expensive wireless charger?     Just a normal cigarette plug in job will do. I've looked on the Nokia site but can't find anything.  Is the USB charging port on the phone a standard port?   I have a JCB car charger

  • Firefox 9 crashes with other opengl apps open

    With Blender 2.6 and the latest FF9 windows open, either one is prone to crash intermittently. This does not happen when working with multiple opengl applications, such as Lightwave, Cinema4d and Blender - only when Firefox is added into the mix will

  • How do I change file format so I keep HD and can play on blu ray player?

    how do I change file format so I keep HD and can play on blu ray player?

  • Screen distortion and crashes

    I get a lot of screen distortion, and my iMac completely freezes or crashes.  I get a video ram failure message when I run Techtool.  I've tried reinstalling the system, but it's still happening. I had the logic board replaced while it was under warr