Signature Schemas/Status values with Signature schemas need to be locked?

I am tying to assign a signature schema to multiple values in a single status schema. If I assign a signature schema to a status it automaticaly locks the document into that status so that no further changes to status can be made. I need to have a signature schema assigned to mutliple status values in the same status schema so I cant have A approved be locked because I still need the document to be B approved as well.
Does anyone know how I can adjust the setting so the status values with sig. schemas attached will not automatically be locked.
Status Schema:
Not Started
A Approved X signature schema
B Approved y signature schema

Hello James,
this is not possible. As I do not quite understand why you want to set up your status schema like that, it is difficult to propose another solution.
If you want to stay with the schema you have mentioned, you will have to unlock a document which has been approved by A on the attribute dialog and set the new status "B Approved" there. But this means that the person who is doing that has to sign the document as first signee of the second signature process.
Best regards
Jürgen

Similar Messages

Behaviour of read-write-backing-map-scheme in combination with local-scheme

Hi,
I have the following questions related to the distributed cache defined below:
1. If I start putting unlimited number of entries to this cache, will I run out of memory or the local-scheme has some default size limit?
2. What is default eviction policy for the local-scheme?
<distributed-scheme>
<scheme-name>A</scheme-name>
<service-name>simple_service</service-name>
<backing-map-scheme>
<read-write-backing-map-scheme>
<internal-cache-scheme>
<local-scheme></local-scheme>
</internal-cache-scheme>
<cachestore-scheme>
<class-scheme>
<class-name>SomeCacheStore</class-name>
</class-scheme>
</cachestore-scheme>
</read-write-backing-map-scheme>
</backing-map-scheme>
</distributed-scheme>
Best regards,
Jarek

Hi,
The default value for expiry-delay is zero which implies no expiry.
http://wiki.tangosol.com/display/COH34UG/local-scheme
Thanks,
Tom

Compare model with diferent schemas to database with diferent schemas

Hi All,
I have some tables in diferent schemas that are equal(i.e: country table, i need this table in all the schemas) name and structure are the same but with diferences in some properties like mandatory columns,
the problem is when I try to compare with the database,
Import from datadictionary swap target model,
i select the model and select the diferent schemas in the database,
in the result, the table with the same name is compared for all the schemas in my model with the table in only one schema of the database
and at the end appears a table to be droped for the tables in the other schemas of my model,
the table comparison is giving me differences in the schema but is not comparing with the correct schema table,
I'm not sure if I'm doing something incorrectly or is just a limitation of the tool,
Thanks in advance

Hi Philip,
You are righ, if a select this option in the compare tab options
I could filter which elements of the model I will compare with the datadictionary,
But is not too much friendly to change this property every time I want to compare the model,
I mean, I have generated with DDL editor a file for some objects but the flag 'generated in DDL' is not changing so I need to do it manually,
I don't know if I'm not doing correctly the generation or if I have some problem with the configuration,
Could you confirm me that if I execute the generation of DDL with only one object this object will be the only one will have the flag checked??
In my opinion if could be posible to include a step in the compare way to select the objects will be more friendly for the user but is still a solution to my problem, Thanks a lot

HL7 schema modification error with imported schema namespace

I have created a variant of one of the out of the box HL7 schemas. The changes were made to the related Segments schema. I have a custom namespace identified on both the "master" schema and one on the modified schema which is being
imported into the "master". I have verified that the namespace of the imported schema matches the namespace identified in the import statement of the master schema. However, I am getting the following error and I'm not sure how to proceed.
There was a failure executing the receive pipeline: "MyProject, MyProject.Pipelines, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=318a75bd6cda7207" Source: "BTAHL7 2.X Disassembler" Receive Port: "rp_ReceiveHL7" URI: "10.26.146.39:11001"
Reason: The namespace attribute 'http://MyProject/2XHL7/MDM/Segments_23' of an import should be the same value as the targetNamespace 'http://microsoft.com/HealthCare/HL7/2X/2.3/Segments' of the imported schema.

Indeed, however, the namespace of the import is same as the value of the imported schema, but the namespace of neither schema is http://microsoft.com/HealthCare/HL7/2X/2.3/Segments,
since I changed it when I made the modification. That namespace does not exist in my project, nor does it exist locally, so i'm not sure where this error message is trying to lead me.

Workflow status column is not showing the internal status values (Inprogress, Started, Suspended, Completed)

I've created SPD 2013 workflow and deployed them onto that document library, This workflow execute on item update event. When updating library item, workflow triggered and completed successfully but workflow status column is not
showing the Internal Status values rather it is showing the Stage information. I've unchecked the "Automatically update stage name on workflow status" and republished the workflow. After that, it is still showing the stage information. Any help
is really appreciated.

Hi Venkadesh,
It is by design that 2013 workflow will show stage name in the workflow status column when
Automatically update the workflow status to the current stage name is checked.
And the workflow status column will be blank when Automatically update the workflow status to the current stage name is unchecked.
For existing workflows, the workflow status will still exists with the previous values after unchecking Automatically update the workflow status to the current stage name.
We can use Set Workflow Status action to update the workflow status value based on our needs.
Best regards,
Victoria
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Regarding Digital Signatures and Seed Values

Hi
First let me explain my scenario i had done so far and then i will explain the problem i am facing.
Scenario
I had created an intercative form with 4 Text Fields along with two signature fields(So that the form has to be signed by two persons let it be User1, User2).
The first two text fields (TextField_1 and TextField_2) will be filled by the User_1 and then User_1 will sign in the First Signature field.
The next two text fields (TextField_3 and TextField_4) will be filled by the User_2 and then User_2 will sign in the Second Signature field.
This is my scenario so far i had done.
Problem i am Facing
The User_1 will fills the value and sign the form and later when the user_2 fills the data and signs the form, the first signature is showing an question mark and exclamatory mark indicating that form had undergone some changes.
Solution type needed
I want a solution in such a way that whenever the user_2 signs the form the status of the signature field_1 should not be changed any more.
According to my frequent search i got some information using of Seed Values will be use full...
Plz suggest how to achive this and also the usage of seed values for the digital signatures,
Thanks In Advance...
Regards
Chandran S

Hi me too facing the problems in digital signatures.
I have put the released strategy at the last stage of status network, yellow warning is coming saying that "you must make digital signature for this status".When i press twice
error message comes "Current digital signature process has been terminated"
Please helps where i am wrong
Bhupendra Singh
Edited by: bhupendra SINGH on Apr 9, 2009 12:29 PM

Public and Authenticated App with Authorization Scheme once per session

I have a question . . .
Let's say I have an application and at the application level I have an authorization scheme (auth1). If auth1 is set up to evaluate once per session, does it authenticate for the public user, then pass me back to the page and then check then evaluate the auth1 scheme. Or does it evaluate the auth1 scheme, then log in, then return to the page. Is it the same regardless of authentication scheme (e.g. Oracle SSO).
It may make a big difference. If the authorization sheme is based upon the user (most will be) then setting it to evaluate once per session can be a real problem. If it evaluates before the user logs in, then it won't really work.
This is an even bigger question when the application does not have a authorization scheme at the application level and allows public pages. If a page that is not public has an authorization scheme set, and the user goes directly to that page, it seems to authenticate the authorization scheme and then logs you in, but does not re-evaluate authorization scheme after you are logged in. Is this accurate? I realize that I could set it up to evaluate for every page view, but I really only need it once after login.
Is this clear?

Anton,
It seems that all authorization schemes that are set to evaluate once per session are evaluated with the beginning establishment of a session.Sort of correct. Authorization schemes don't get evaluated until the component that uses them is considered for rendering or processing. So if the authorization scheme is attached to a page, it won't fire until the page is requested. If another component uses that scheme first, the evaluation will happen then and will not happen again during the session.
What if I have another page that is not public. If it is the first page I go to, what happens. Obviously, I get redirected to login, then login. Do the authorization schemes get evaluated at this point?Yes, assuming the authorization scheme is used by the page, the scheme is evaluated during the first rendering or processing of the page in the session, after the authentication step.
Now, what if I have a page that is public, but also has an auth scheme (odd, but could happen). Now what happens, does the auth scheme get evaluated before or after login?During the rendering or processing of the page after the authentication step. For a public page, the authentication step is performed up to the point where it determines that no authentication is required.
OK, now let's add in Application level auth scheme. I can have public or private pages. If I go to a private page, when does the app level auth scheme kick in? How about for a public page?When an application uses an authorization scheme, it gets evaluated before the authorization scheme (if any) for the page that is being requested, so the public/private property of the page doesn't matter.
General advice: when an authorization scheme uses :APP_USER, it doesn't work well to have it fire once per session because it'll get run before authentication to the application occurs, which sets APP_USER. You can have such schemes fire once per page view and for PL/SQL function-type schemes, have them give a "pass" when the current page is the login page, that kind of thing.
In addition, if the overhead of running a scheme is high, one can set an application-level item to indicate that a once-per-page scheme has already run satisfactorily. The PL/SQL-type schemes can access the value of such an item to skip the expensive part of the evaluation and return true immediately.
Finally, the htmldb_application.reset_security_check API can be called in order to reset the "fired" status of all authorization schemes in the session, allowing them to be re-evaluated if/when they are encountered again in the session.
Hope this helps,
Scott

Create Multiple Signature and Date fields with a custom Toolbar Button

First off, thanks in advance! I am a scripting newbie and I am trudging my way through with very little experience with scripting of any kind. I am good at taking other's scripts and forming them into something I need, but I can't seem to find anything to do what I want.
Using Adobe Acrobat X, I am trying to create a toolbar button that I can press to create multiple signature and date fields with predetermined locations.
Below is the script I have that is working to create just a single signature box, but I can't seem to figure out the exact syntax to have that same button create multiple fields. In total it is 9 signature fields and 9 date fields need to be created. If you can just give me an example of what the button would look like with multiple scripts? I was assuming I would set up multiple variables and then in the cExec property of the toolbar button I could just call out all of those variables?
var sigswm = "addField('sigSWM', 'signature', '0', [108, 198, 494.64, 72])"
app.addToolButton({cName: "dotbutton", cExec: sigswm, cLabel: "Place Signature and Date Blocks",});
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
Billy Sweeney

Thanks! That was probably the only thing I didn't try.
I do have one more question. What I want is when the signature field is clicked it fills out a specific date field. I beleive the script I want would be:
var currentTime = new Date()
    var month = currentTime.getMonth() + 1
    var day = currentTime.getDate()
    var year = currentTime.getFullYear()
    var signingTime = day +"/"+month+"/"+year
    var f = this.getField("dateSWM");
    f.value = signingTime;
I found this on another thread that mentioned it could be placed in the Signed tab of the signature properties dialog. I am assuming it would be placed in my button script file as a setAction script for each signature, but I am not real sure exactly where or how?

What is star schema - pls explain with example

Hai.
what is star schema - pls explain with example
thanks in advance
Giri

Hi Giri,
SAP's BIW employs extended star schama
The extended star schema consists of a fact table (in two parts, E and F - f is the inbound table, E long-term storage). Dimension tables are connected to the fact tables via the DIMID(dimension id) which is a generated value and is stored in both dimension and fact tables. In addition, the dimension tables are connected to tables which hold master data values (or bind the dimension table to tables that hold the values), such as S tables, P, Q, X, Y. These dimension tables hold SIDs, again generated keys which relate values in the dimension table (the DIMIDs) with master data values. Thus, at the time of the query, join operations ensure that the master data values can be merged with the key figure values stored in the fact tables.
Truthfully, one does not need to understand this schema extensively in order to model in BI in SAP NetWeaver. It helps to understand master data, navigational attributes, etc. Otherwise, simply model the key figures in the fact table and the characteristics into dimensions and you're good - the application generates the star schema for you - you don't have to specify it.
See the transaction "LISTSCHEMA" which will show you the relationship between the F fact table and the other tables of the cube's star schema.
Also follow the link for more info:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/4c/89dc37c7f2d67ae10000009b38f889/content.htm
Thanks for any points you assign.
Regards

How to develope application with multiple schema

Hi,
In my application, there is 3 schema, forms are from different schema, but the database is one. How should I manage it, When i open the form with different schema I am not getting the expected result,
I am using Oracle 10g Forms & Database
Thanks in advance
Rizly

hi,
what database-user is the user connected with, when executing the forms ? Is it one of the three schemaowners or has each logical user his own database-user?
About your db-objects:
I would create 3 roles, one for each schema, and grant the needed privileges for one schema to the according role
Example:
CREATE ROLE RL_SCHEMA1;
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE ON SCHEMA1.TABLE RO RL_SCHEMA1;
...Then you can grant the roles to the databaseuser you are connected with at runtime.
If you use named users (each logical user has it's own database-user) then you assign each user only those roles he needs.

Catch all error information while validating xml content with xsd schema

Hi experts,
I created a java mapping to validating the input xml content with xsd schema (schema validation). What I want is to catch all error message to the xml not just the first error. I used SAXParser in sapxmltoolkit.jar to do the schema validation. The below is a part of my java mapping.
XMLReader parser = XMLReaderFactory.createXMLReader("com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.SAXParser");
parser.setFeature( "http://xml.org/sax/features/validation" , true);
parser.setFeature( "http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema" , true);
parser.setProperty("http://java.sun.com/xml/jaxp/properties/schemaLanguage", "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema");          parser.setProperty("http://java.sun.com/xml/jaxp/properties/schemaSource",this.getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(schema)); // schema is my schema name
parser.setErrorHandler(new ParseErrorHandler()); // ParseErrorHandler is my own ErrorHandler which extends DefaultHandler
parser.parse(new InputSource(new ByteArrayInputStream(sinput.getBytes())));
// In error handler, I comment all code so as not to throw any exception
public class ParseErrorHandler extends DefaultHandler
     public void error(SAXParseException e) throws SAXException
          // sSystem.out.println("Error" + e.getMessage());
          // throw e;
     public void fatalError(SAXParseException e)
          // throw e;
          // System.out.println("SAP Fatal Error" + e.getMessage());
Unfortunately the program always stopped while catching the first error. Check the below log.
com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.NestedSAXParserException: Fatal Error: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException:
ERRORS :
cvc-simple-type : information item '/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]/:PartnerInformation[1]/:AddressInformation[1]/:CityName[1]' is not valid, because it's value does not satisfy the constraints of facet 'minLength' with value '1'.
cvc-data : information item '/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]/:PartnerInformation[1]/:AddressInformation[1]/:CityName[1]' is is not valid with respoct to the corresponding simple type definition.
cvc-element : element information item '/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]/:PartnerInformation[1]/:AddressInformation[1]/:CityName[1]' is associated with invalid data.
cvc-element : element information item '/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]/:PartnerInformation[1]/:AddressInformation[1]' is not valid with respect to it's complex type definition..
cvc-element : element information item '/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]/:PartnerInformation[1]' is not valid with respect to it's complex type definition..
cvc-element : element information item '/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]' is not valid with respect to it's complex type definition..
cvc-element : element information item '/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]' is not valid with respect to it's complex type definition..
cvc-element : element information item '/:ShipNotice[1]' is not valid with respect to it's complex type definition..
-> com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException:
I tried using Xerces and JAXP to do validation, the same error happened. I have no idea on this. Does xi has its own error handler logic? Is there any body can make me get out of this?
Thanks.

<h6>Hi experts,
<h6>
<h6>I created a java mapping to validating the input xml content with xsd schema (schema validation). What I want is to catch all <h6>error message to the xml not just the first error. I used SAXParser in sapxmltoolkit.jar to do the schema validation. The below <h6>is a part of my java mapping.
<h6>XMLReader parser = XMLReaderFactory.createXMLReader("com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.SAXParser");
<h6>parser.setFeature( "http://xml.org/sax/features/validation" , true);
<h6>parser.setFeature( "http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema" , true);
<h6>parser.setProperty("http://java.sun.com/xml/jaxp/properties/schemaLanguage", "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema");          <h6>parser.setProperty("http://java.sun.com/xml/jaxp/properties/schemaSource",this.getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(schema)); <h6>// schema is my schema name
<h6>parser.setErrorHandler(new ParseErrorHandler()); // ParseErrorHandler is my own ErrorHandler which extends Default Handler
<h6>parser.parse(new InputSource(new ByteArrayInputStream(sinput.getBytes())));
<h6>
<h6>// In error handler, I comment all code so as not to throw any exception
<h6>public class ParseErrorHandler extends DefaultHandler
<h6>{
<h6>     public void error(SAXParseException e) throws SAXException
<h6>     {
<h6>          // sSystem.out.println("Error" + e.getMessage());
<h6>          // throw e;
<h6>     }
<h6>
<h6>     public void fatalError(SAXParseException e)
<h6>     {
<h6>          // throw e;
<h6>          // System.out.println("SAP Fatal Error" + e.getMessage());
<h6>
<h6>     }
<h6>
<h6>}
<h6>
<h6>Unfortunately the program always stopped while catching the first error. Check the below log.
<h6>
<h6>com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.NestedSAXParserException: Fatal Error: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException:
<h6>ERRORS :
<h6>cvc-simple-type : information item <h6>'/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]/:PartnerInformation[1]/:AddressInformation[1]/:CityName[1]' <h6>is not valid, because it's value does not satisfy the constraints of facet 'minLength' with value '1'.
<h6>cvc-data : information item <h6>'/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]/:PartnerInformation[1]/:AddressInformation[1]/:CityName[1]' <h6>is is not valid with respoct to the corresponding simple type definition.
<h6>cvc-element : element information item <h6>'/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]/:PartnerInformation[1]/:AddressInformation[1]/:CityName[1]' <h6>is associated with invalid data.
<h6>cvc-element : element information item <h6>'/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]/:PartnerInformation[1]/:AddressInformation[1]' <h6>is not valid with respect to it's complex type definition..
<h6>cvc-element : element information item <h6>'/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]/:PartnerInformation[1]' <h6>is not valid with respect to it's complex type definition..
<h6>cvc-element : element information item <h6>'/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]/:To[1]' <h6>is not valid with respect to it's complex type definition..
<h6>cvc-element : element information item <h6>'/:ShipNotice[1]/:Header[1]' <h6>is not valid with respect to it's complex type definition..
<h6>cvc-element : element information item '/:ShipNotice[1]' is not valid with <h6>respect to it's complex type definition..
<h6> -> com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.ParserException:
<h6>
<h6>
<h6>I tried using Xerces and JAXP to do validation, the same error happened. I have no idea on this. Does xi has its own error <h6>handler logic? Is there any body can make me get out of this?
<h6>Thanks.

Using dbms_datapump package to export the schema with the schema name as pa

Hi,
I am using the pl/sql block to export schema using dbms_datapump package,Now I want to pass the scheme name as the parameter to the procedure and get the .dmp and .log files with the schema name included.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE export
IS
h1 number;
begin
h1 := dbms_datapump.open (operation => 'EXPORT', job_mode => 'SCHEMA', job_name => 'export1', version => 'COMPATIBLE');
dbms_datapump.set_parallel(handle => h1, degree => 1);
dbms_datapump.add_file(handle => h1, filename => 'EXPDAT.LOG', directory => 'DATA_PUMP_DIR', filetype => 3);
dbms_datapump.set_parameter(handle => h1, name => 'KEEP_MASTER', value => 0);
dbms_datapump.metadata_filter(handle => h1, name => 'SCHEMA_EXPR', value => 'IN(''CHECKOUT'')');
dbms_datapump.set_parameter(handle => h1, name => 'ESTIMATE', value => 'BLOCKS');
dbms_datapump.add_file(handle => h1, filename => 'EXPDAT%U' || to_char(sysdate,'dd-mm-yyyy') || '.DMP', directory => 'DATA_PUMP_DIR', filetype => 1);
dbms_datapump.set_parameter(handle => h1, name => 'INCLUDE_METADATA', value => 1);
dbms_datapump.set_parameter(handle => h1, name => 'DATA_ACCESS_METHOD', value => 'AUTOMATIC');
dbms_datapump.start_job(handle => h1, skip_current => 0, abort_step => 0);
dbms_datapump.detach (handle => h1);
exception
when others then
raise_application_error(-20001,'An error was encountered - '||SQLCODE||' -ERROR- '||SQLERRM);
end;
Thank you in advanced
Sri

user12062360 wrote:
Hi,
I am using the pl/sql block to export schema using dbms_datapump package,Now I want to pass the scheme name as the parameter to the procedure and get the .dmp and .log files with the schema name included.
OK, please proceed to do so
>
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE export
IS
h1 number;
begin
h1 := dbms_datapump.open (operation => 'EXPORT', job_mode => 'SCHEMA', job_name => 'export1', version => 'COMPATIBLE');
dbms_datapump.set_parallel(handle => h1, degree => 1);
dbms_datapump.add_file(handle => h1, filename => 'EXPDAT.LOG', directory => 'DATA_PUMP_DIR', filetype => 3);
dbms_datapump.set_parameter(handle => h1, name => 'KEEP_MASTER', value => 0);
dbms_datapump.metadata_filter(handle => h1, name => 'SCHEMA_EXPR', value => 'IN(''CHECKOUT'')');
dbms_datapump.set_parameter(handle => h1, name => 'ESTIMATE', value => 'BLOCKS');
dbms_datapump.add_file(handle => h1, filename => 'EXPDAT%U' || to_char(sysdate,'dd-mm-yyyy') || '.DMP', directory => 'DATA_PUMP_DIR', filetype => 1);
dbms_datapump.set_parameter(handle => h1, name => 'INCLUDE_METADATA', value => 1);
dbms_datapump.set_parameter(handle => h1, name => 'DATA_ACCESS_METHOD', value => 'AUTOMATIC');
dbms_datapump.start_job(handle => h1, skip_current => 0, abort_step => 0);
dbms_datapump.detach (handle => h1);
exception
when others then
raise_application_error(-20001,'An error was encountered - '||SQLCODE||' -ERROR- '||SQLERRM);
end;
EXCEPTION handler is a bug waiting to happen.
eliminate it entirely

Not correct Network schema status [Tcode CN21]

Hi experts,
I am having a problem with transaction CN21: I have to create a network with custom profile, so i follow these steps:
1. lanch Tcode CN21
2. set details of network and WBS
3. Clicking on the green symbol with wich I can select tasks I insert a list of materials that the network requires
4. I select the row and then I click on the "I" bottom (the blue one ) of information to set the schema status
5. I choose from a menu my custom schema status
6. I click on save.
7. I get back a message error that is the one in the title.
Is a standard message that i read in italian, but not in english maybe due to some controls on log-on language, so I can't write here exactly the error text, but translated should be like the one in the title
I am sure that is a customizing problem, but I don't know where can I act, I searched something in SPRO but I found nothing useful.
I hope that you are able to help me with these small informations or at least are able to suggest me what can I search
Bye!

your network profile does not seem to have status profile
check if you used a template with the one activity having status profile
also check field selection for network as your status profile seems to be display only

Linking specific fields with signature

I am new to this so please forgive my ignorance...I have a form that I created with Designer 7.1 and it has 5 different sections on it each with its own signature object. How can I or am I even able to link the signature of each section with the objects(text fields, check boxes, etc) in that section. So when you sign that section, that section then becomes read only. This way the form is able to pass between 5 different people who all need to sign the form.

Unfortunately, all I have is view access to these tables. When I click "add command" and put in working SQL I get this error message.
"Only an ET or null statement is legal after a DDL Statement" The sql that I am adding works just fine in the TeraData SQL Assistant and figured just adding it in as a sql command would work.
In a previous post on a TeraData forum I saw something referring to the addition of a BEGIN TRANSACTION simple sql END TRANSACTION; DDL;
What am I doing wrong and can this be remedied?
Here is the help I received in the Teradata forum
" I am not familiar with Crystal Reports but I can tell you what the message means.
Your session is running in BTET mode and you have started a transaction (BT;), or Crystal Reports did. Then you/it submitted a DDL statement (database Data_DB). Then you/it submitted the select statement in the same transaction. You need terminate the transaction after the database statement (ET;). All DDL statements have to run as a single transaction. You might want to determine why Crystal Reports is running everything as one transaction. Maybe there is an option to generate each statement as a single transaction. That is what SQL Assistant is doing for you. "
Has anyone experienced this message and know a way around it?
Thank you.

How to share data in "User_*" tables with another schema

I would like to share the data in the USER_SEGMENTS table with another schema. If I create a view and grant select on the view, when the other schema queries the view the data is identical to themselves querying the SYS.user_segments table directly.
create view sys_user_segments as select * from sys.user_segments;
grant select on sys_user_segments to A;My guess is that the SYS.user_segments table is a view based on the current user.
Is there a way to share this data without creating a copy of the table?
Oracle: 10g
Thanks

Hi,
All the data dictionary "tables" whose names start with user_ (or all_ or dba_) are actually views, and what results they bring back depend on what schema you logged in to. I don't think there's any way to allow user A to directly see what's in user B's version of user_segments.
Why do you need this? Can you use the all_ views instead, by giving A some privileges on B's objects?
Failing that, you can replicate the data into a regular table. Inside a AUTHID DEFINER stored procedure, the data dictionary views (such as user_segments) are the versions of the procedure owner, so B can write a stored procedure (let's call it populate_my_segments) that populates a regular table (let's call it my_segements), and then grant EXECUTE privilges on populat_my_segments and SELECT privileges on my_segements to user A. A can then refresh the table and look at it whenever he wants to.
If A only needs to see a little information, e.g. the total number of bytes, from B's user_segments, then B can write a function just to return that information.

Signature Schemas/Status values with Signature schemas need to be locked?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for