Simple query on perform enperform on form pls asnwere asap

hi i am using
/: IF LTAP-f1<> LTAP-f2
PERFORM HAND_UNIT IN PROGRAM ZPICK_LIST_PH3
USING &LTAK-VBELN&
CHANGING &V_VBELN&
/:ENDPERFORM
/: if LTAP-f3 = V_VBELN
code...
....layout changeetc
;/ endif second if
endif. " first if
NOW MY PROBLEM IS THAT IN FIRST CONDITON THOUGH ITS EQUAL LTAP-F1 IS = TO LTAP-F2 STILL THE CURSOR IS EXECUTING THE PERFORM STATMENT?
PLS SUGGEST IF THE IF CONDTION IS FALSE IE F1<> F2
IT SHOULD NOT GO INSIDE TO EXECUET THE PERFORM BUT IT IS GOING INSIDE AND EXECUTING IT
BUT ON SECOND IF STATMENT ITS BEHAVING OPPOSITE
WHEN TH F3 = V_VBELN IS TRUE IS THEY ARE SAME IT IS NOT GOING INSID THE CODE
PLS SUGGEST THIS DIFFERENCT AND OPPOSITE BEHAVIOUR IS ANY PROBLME IN CODE
REGARDS
ARORA

Hi Nishant,
You are missing the & in your code.
/: IF &LTAP-f1& = &LTAP-f2&.
PERFORM HAND_UNIT IN PROGRAM ZPICK_LIST_PH3
USING &LTAK-VBELN&
CHANGING &V_VBELN&
/:ENDPERFORM
/: if &LTAP-f3& = &V_VBELN&.
code...
....layout changeetc
;/ endif second if
endif. " first if
Reward if helpful.

Similar Messages

Need customized query on updateable report (tabular form)

I have a pl/sql function that returns a SELECT statement based on very flexible query specifications allowed in a form. (Form has a field for each table column, allows operations like <,>,between, etc, that can be entered directly into the field; all fields need not have some sort of query constraint specified. Essentially the same sort of query flexibility you get in Forms... ) The select always returns the same number of columns. Query results are returned on a different page (either report or tabular form) than that used to enter the query specs.
The function works beautifully on a page type of Report.
However, when I take a Tabular Form and switch its query source to PL/SQL function body returns SQL select, the page type becomes Report. The query works on this modified page (returns correct rows), and the columns are still editable (can be typed into) but the changes can't be submitted because the page is no longer a tabular form -- Error is: No updateable report found. Multi row updated and delete operations can only be performed on tabular forms of type 'Updateable Report'.
How can I have flexible query specs paired w/ an updateable report? Does this require writing my own multi-row DML processes? Or is there a simpler way?
Thanks,
Carol

I have a pl/sql function that returns a SELECT statement based on very flexible query specifications allowed in a form. (Form has a field for each table column, allows operations like <,>,between, etc, that can be entered directly into the field; all fields need not have some sort of query constraint specified. Essentially the same sort of query flexibility you get in Forms... ) The select always returns the same number of columns. Query results are returned on a different page (either report or tabular form) than that used to enter the query specs.
The function works beautifully on a page type of Report.
However, when I take a Tabular Form and switch its query source to PL/SQL function body returns SQL select, the page type becomes Report. The query works on this modified page (returns correct rows), and the columns are still editable (can be typed into) but the changes can't be submitted because the page is no longer a tabular form -- Error is: No updateable report found. Multi row updated and delete operations can only be performed on tabular forms of type 'Updateable Report'.
How can I have flexible query specs paired w/ an updateable report? Does this require writing my own multi-row DML processes? Or is there a simpler way?
Thanks,
Carol

Simple Query in Oracle Linked Table in MS Access causes full table scan.

I am running a very simple query in MS ACCESS to a linked Oracle table as follows:
Select *
From EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS --(the linked table name refers to EXPRESS.SERVICE_EVENTS)
Where performed > MyDate()
or
Select *
From EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS --(the linked table name refers to EXPRESS.SERVICE_EVENTS)
Where performed > [Forms]![MyForm]![Date1]
We have over 50 machines and this query runs fine on over half of these, using an Oracle Index on the "performed" field. Running exactly the same thing on the other machines causes a full table scan, therefore ignoring the Index (all machines access the same Access DB).
Strangely, if we write the query as follows:
Select *
From EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS
Where performed > #09/04/2009 08:00#
it works fast everywhere!
Any help on this 'phenominon' would be appreciated.
Things we've done:
Checked regional settings, ODBC driver settings, MS Access settings (as in Tools->Options), we have the latest XP and Office service packs, and re-linked all Access Tables on both the slow and fast machines independantly).

Primarily, thanks gdarling for your reply. This solved our problem.
Just a small note to those who may be using this thread.
Although this might not be the reason, my PC had Oracle 9iR2 installed with Administratiev Tools, where user machines had the same thing installed but using Runtime Installation. For some reason, my PC did not have 'bind date' etc. as an option in the workarounds, but user machines did have this workaround option. Strangely, although I did not have the option, my (ODBC) query was running as expected, but user queries were not.
When we set the workaround checkbox accordingly, the queries then run as expected (fast).
Once again,
Thanks

How to improve performance of Oracle Forms Server ?

Recently we converted our Application which was Developed in Forms 5.0 and Reports 3.0 into Forms6i to host that on to Web. We also loaded ORACLE 9iAS (on Windows NT 4 with service pack 3) from "Enterprise Edition" option by selecting Oracle Database Cache, Forms Server and Reports Server, HTTP Server(on port 80),Oracle Web Cache. Everything loaded succesfully including Caches.
Forms server is working perfectly and we were able to run our Application in Browser, but performance is the issue. We thought the caches will improve the performance, but it seems they are not at all working. When we run a report or form the Database cache is not giving any statistics whether a particular Query is a Hit or Miss though the cache is running. We got a doubt and searched in FAQ's and we found the following questions.
Oracle9iAS Web Cache Frequently Asked
Questions February 2001
Does Oracle9iAS Web Cache work with applications that use Oracle9iAS Forms?
Not in the 1.x release of Oracle9iAS. Integration between Oracle9iAS Web Cache and Oracle9iAS Forms will be addressed at a future date.
Oracle9iAS Database Cache
Does the Cache work with Oracle Forms and Portal in Oracle9i AS?
Since Oracle Forms and Portal utilize read/write PL/SQL stored procedures, these components cannot take advantage of the Cache. This support is being considered for a future version.
After coming to know that Caches doesnot boost the performance of Oracle Forms and reports. We have the following queries.
1) Clarify whether the above are True.
2) Apart from DB and Web Cache is there any other way where in we can improve the performance of Oracle Forms and Reports in Forms Server including the start up time.
3) What is the ideal configuration required for each tier (iAS Server,Database Server and Client) to host Forms on to Web considering our application as Medium scale.
(Presently our configuration are,
Application Server Configuration : Windows NT 4 with service pack 3,256 MB RAM,1 GB Virtual memory and 4GB free space and almost the same configuration is being used for
Database Configuration.
Client Configuration : Windows 98 with 64MB RAM).
4) Is there any way to track the performance and know the problem areas like TRACE.
Gopi Kumar
null

A couple of questions for you:
1) What version of IAS are you using?
2) What's the version of Forms&Reports and
3) What version of patch are you using if any
for forms&Reports?
4) What applications are you running on the
machine where Forms&Reports is installed?
(I mean non-Oracle applications?)
The problem could be that, the base addresses
of the DLL's in Forms&Reports could be having base address conflicts with some other application's DLL's.
Forms and Reports needs to be fully rebased to achieve full performance on NT. Before release of Forms and Reports, Oracle rebases all DLLs. Rebasing assigns unique base addresses to all of the DLL's in use by an executable. A properly based DLL will load at its preferred base address, greatly improving the efficiency of memory utilization and the runtime performance of the executable.
Multiple utilities are available on NT to verify proper rebasing of DLLs. HandleEx v4.0 is one such freeware from Sysinternals and is available at www.sysinternals.com. Some others are "depends.exe" that's part of the MS Visual Studio or msinfo32.exe that comes with Office 2000 on NT.
If after running any of these utilities you discover that the DLL's ar not properly rebased, you need to contact Oracle worldwide support.
If you find that rebasing is not the problem, then please post your feedback again. Hope this helps.

A simple query

a simple query
on plsql block
if i don't define the size of a variable of number type what will be the default size ?
declare
a number ;
begin
null
end;
and in a procedure if i don't mention in or out in the parameters what will oracle take it by default ?
create or replace procedure(a number,b number)
is
begin
null
end;
PLs note that both the pl/sql blocks are just for giving an idea .
regards
SHUBH

You can get such information from the documents.
[imp]The absence of precision and scale designators specifies the maximum range and precision for an Oracle number.[imp]
Cheers
Sarma.

Query based on a search form

Hi,
I have a search form with a number of fields, and based on the values of 1 or more fields that the user fills in, the result is shown.
I need to write a query for this, and have started out with a very simple query just to test the search result based on only 2 field values, however it does filter out the table to show the correct result....
select firstname, lastname
from employees
where ((employees.firstname=:P1_firstname or :P1_firstname is NULL)
and (employees.lastname =:P1_lastname or :P1_lastname is NULL))
Can anyone help?
Thanks.

Your select seems right to me. Maybe you should compare the data in your table with the data that you enter.
Consider:
- Length of search string (MILL <> MILLER)
- Spelling differences (UPPERcase, lowercase)
Give an example output!

Improving a simple Query

Following is a simple query, what i want to know, i have added upper select to get d.name which is the description of region_code. Can i get whole result with single select
SELECT t.region_code,d.name, t.emp_contr
FROM
(SELECT c.br_region_fo_code as Region_Code,
SUM(c.employer_contribution) AS emp_contr
FROM core_business.cb_contr_emp_pmt_slip c
GROUP BY c.br_region_fo_code ) t,
general_information.cb_region_fo d
WHERE t.br_region_fo_code = d.region_fo_code;

Boneist wrote:
malhi wrote:
Following is a simple query, what i want to know, i have added upper select to get d.name which is the description of region_code. Can i get whole result with single select
SELECT t.region_code,d.name, t.emp_contr
FROM
(SELECT c.br_region_fo_code as Region_Code,
SUM(c.employer_contribution) AS emp_contr
FROM core_business.cb_contr_emp_pmt_slip c
GROUP BY c.br_region_fo_code ) t,
general_information.cb_region_fo d
WHERE t.br_region_fo_code = d.region_fo_code;To be honest, I wouldn't bother rewriting the above query - it looks like it's filtering early (although Oracle could choose to rewrite it so that it does the join first, I guess), so that you're reducing the number of rows that the outer query has to join to. That means less work. If it is rewriting, I'd stick a no_merge hint on the subquery, to tell Oracle to do the grouping first before joining.
You could rewrite the above query as:
SELECT c.br_region_fo_code AS region_code,
d.name,
SUM(c.employer_contribution) AS emp_contr
FROM core_business.cb_contr_emp_pmt_slip c,
general_information.cb_region_fo d
WHERE t.br_region_fo_code = d.region_fo_code
GROUP BY c.br_region_fo_code, d.name;but whether Oracle will filter early or not is another matter. You would have to test both runs.I believe that Jonathan Lewis had a demonstration of execution plans that showed Oracle transforming queries to "push" GROUP BY clause prior to a join when sufficient contraints were in place to allow that and there was a performance benefit in doing so. I'd certainly be interested in seeing whether this was being done. The optimisation was really aimed at reducing the size of the group by key columns.

Simple query ... syntax error ?

What is wrong with this simple sql statement ?
SELECT Caseid
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT Caseid, userid FROM Atts)
I get this error
Server: Msg 170, Level 15, State 1, Line 2
Line 2: Incorrect syntax near ')'.

In this case, it could go either way. Because the derived
table is
performing the select distinct anyway, the execution plans
would be similar,
but you'd see one extra step for selecting all rows from the
derived table.
Notice that the derived table has distinct caseid, userid,
but the main
query only selects caseid. If the extra IO required to
transmit the
unwanted userid column is more expensive than the extra step
required to
select just the caseid column out of the derived table, then
the derived
table is the better choice.
In any case, the simpler query is usually the better option.
Unless he
actually wants a duplicate caseid for each userid, but not
the userid
itself, plain ol' SELECT DISTINCT makes more sense.
"bregent" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:ejaad1$k2u$[email protected]..
> >On the contrary, subqueries in the FROM clause are
quite useful and can
> >in
> >the right situations perform much better than
alternative queries.
>
> Ah, as usual you are correct. It looks like he forgot to
add a DT alias
> name
> at the end of the statement which is causing the error.
But in any case, a
> simple select distinct would yield the same results and
performance,
> correct?
>

Best design for Boolean function from simple query

Hello,
what is the most efficient, shorter, readable, simple way to make a boolean function that simply return true or false from a simple query that return 0 or 1 to n records?
Is this solution using a cursor's the best (working...):
   FUNCTION is_date_present (p_date IN DATE)
      RETURN BOOLEAN
   IS
      CURSOR chk_cursor
      IS
         SELECT COUNT (*)
           FROM target_dates
          WHERE target_date = p_date;
      nb   NUMBER := 0;
   BEGIN
      OPEN chk_cursor;
      FETCH chk_cursor
       INTO nb;
      CLOSE chk_cursor;
      IF nb >= 1
      THEN
         RETURN TRUE;
      ELSE
         RETURN FALSE;
      END IF;
   END;Performance, clarity and simplicity are important...
Thanks

Well, I prefer (not tested):
FUNCTION is_date_present (p_date IN DATE)
RETURN BOOLEAN
IS
nb NUMBER := 0;
BEGIN
SELECT COUNT (*)
INTO nb
FROM target_dates
WHERE target_date = p_date;
IF nb >= 1 THEN
RETURN TRUE;
LSE
RETURN FALSE;
IF;
END;Regards,
MiguelWhy count multiple records when you only care if you get at least 1 occurrence? Just wasted cycles.
FUNCTION is_date_present (p_date IN DATE)
RETURN BOOLEAN
IS
nb NUMBER := 0;
BEGIN
SELECT COUNT (*)
INTO nb
FROM DUAL
WHERE EXISTS
      SELECT NULL
      FROM target_dates
      WHERE target_date = p_date
IF nb >= 1 THEN
     RETURN TRUE;
ELSE
     RETURN FALSE;
END IF;
END;Or you could just add a ROWNUM = 1 on to yours, either way.

Two or more productid will be accquired by same customerid, by same shipvia, on the same day of the week of shipped date. i want the simple query for this.

consider this situation,
Two or more productid will be accquired by same customerid, by same shipvia, on the same day of the week of shipped date. i want the simple query for this.
my tables are from northwind:
[orders] = OrderID, CustomerID, EmployeeID, OrderDate, RequiredDate, ShippedDate, ShipVia, Freight, ShipName, ShipAddress, ShipCity, ShipRegion, ShipPostalCode, ShipCountry.
[orders details] = OrderID, ProductID, UnitPrice, Quantity, Discount.
i tried some but it is not exact, it gives wrong result.
select pd.CustomerID,pd.ProductID, pd.no_of_time_purchased, sd.ShipVia, sd.same_ship_count, shipped_day from
select ProductID,o.CustomerID,COUNT(productid) as no_of_time_purchased
from orders o join [Order Details] od on o.OrderID=od.OrderID group by ProductID,o.CustomerID
having count(od.ProductID) >1) pd
join
(select OrderID,customerid, shipvia, count(shipvia)as same_ship_count, DATENAME(DW,ShippedDate)as shipped_day from orders
group by customerid, ShipVia, ShippedDate having COUNT(ShipVia) > 1 ) sd
on sd.CustomerID=pd.CustomerID

Hi,
I think I have a solution that will at least give you a clue how to go about it. I have simplified the tables you mentioned and created them as temporary tables on my side, with some fake data to test with. I have incldued the generation of these temporary
tables for your review.
In my example I have included:
1. A customer which has purchased the same product on the same day, using the same ship 3 times,
2. Another example the same as the first but the third purchase was on a different day
3. Another example the same as the first but the third purchase was a different product
4. Another example the same as the first but the third purchase was using a different "ShipVia".
You should be able to see that by grouping on all of the columns that you wich to return, you should not need to perform any subselects.
Please let me know if I have missed any requirements.
Hope this helps:
CREATE TABLE #ORDERS
OrderID INT,
CustomerID INT,
OrderDate DATETIME,
ShipVia VARCHAR(5)
CREATE TABLE #ORDERS_DETAILS
OrderID INT,
ProductID INT,
INSERT INTO #ORDERS
VALUES
(1, 1, GETDATE(), 'ABC'),
(2, 1, GETDATE(), 'ABC'),
(3, 1, GETDATE(), 'ABC'),
(4, 2, GETDATE() - 4, 'DEF'),
(5, 2, GETDATE() - 4, 'DEF'),
(6, 2, GETDATE() - 5, 'DEF'),
(7, 3, GETDATE() - 10, 'GHI'),
(8, 3, GETDATE() - 10, 'GHI'),
(9, 3, GETDATE() - 10, 'GHI'),
(10, 4, GETDATE() - 10, 'JKL'),
(11, 4, GETDATE() - 10, 'JKL'),
(12, 4, GETDATE() - 10, 'MNO')
INSERT INTO #ORDERS_DETAILS
VALUES
(1, 1),
(2, 1),
(3, 1),
(4, 2),
(5, 2),
(6, 2),
(7, 3),
(8, 3),
(9, 4),
(10, 5),
(11, 5),
(12, 5)
SELECT * FROM #ORDERS
SELECT * FROM #ORDERS_DETAILS
SELECT
O.CustomerID,
OD.ProductID,
O.ShipVia,
COUNT(O.ShipVia),
DATENAME(DW, O.OrderDate) AS [Shipped Day]
FROM #ORDERS O
JOIN #ORDERS_DETAILS OD ON O.orderID = OD.OrderID
GROUP BY OD.ProductID, O.CustomerID, O.ShipVia, DATENAME(DW, O.OrderDate) HAVING COUNT(OD.ProductID) > 1
DROP TABLE #ORDERS
DROP TABLE #ORDERS_DETAILS

This simple query takes 2 hrs. How to improve it??

This is a simple query. It takes 2 hours to run this query. Tables have over 100,000 rows.
SELECT
TO_CHAR(BC_T_ARRIVALS.ARR_FLIGHT_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYY') ARR_FLIGHT_DATE
FROM
BC_T_ARRIVALS a, BC_M_FLIGHTS f
WHERE
a.ARR_FLT_SEQ_NO = f.FLT_SEQ_NO AND
f.FLT_LOC_CODE       = PK_BC_R_LOCATIONS.FN_SEL_LOC_CODE('BANDARANAYAKE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT') AND TO_CHAR(a.ARR_FLIGHT_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD') >= TO_CHAR(:P_FROM_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD')
AND TO_CHAR(a.ARR_FLIGHT_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD') <= TO_CHAR(:P_TO_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD')
UNION
SELECT
TO_CHAR(BC_T_DEPARTURES.DEP_FLIGHT_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYY') DEP_FLIGHT_DATE
FROM
BC_T_DEPARTURES d, BC_M_FLIGHTS f
WHERE
d.DEP_FLT_SEQ_NO = BC_M_FLIGHTS.FLT_SEQ_NO AND
f.FLT_LOC_CODE = PK_BC_R_LOCATIONS.FN_SEL_LOC_CODE('BANDARANAYAKE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT') AND TO_CHAR(d.DEP_FLIGHT_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD') >= TO_CHAR(:P_FROM_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD')
AND TO_CHAR(d.DEP_FLIGHT_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD') <= TO_CHAR(:P_TO_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD')As I see it, this query will not make the DB engine use any indexes since expressions are used in the 'WHERE' clause. Am I correct?
How can we improve the performance of this query???

Maybe (do you really need to convert dates to chars ? That might prevent index use ...)
select f.BC_M_FLIGHTS,
       TO_CHAR(BC_T_DEPARTURES.DEP_FLIGHT_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYY') DEP_FLIGHT_DATE,
       TO_CHAR(BC_T_ARRIVALS.ARR_FLIGHT_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYY') ARR_FLIGHT_DATE
from (select BC_M_FLIGHTS,
               FLT_LOC_CODE
          from BC_M_FLIGHTS
         where FLT_LOC_CODE = PK_BC_R_LOCATIONS.FN_SEL_LOC_CODE('BANDARANAYAKE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT')
       ) f,
       BC_T_ARRIVALS a,
       BC_T_DEPARTURES d
where f.BC_M_FLIGHTS = a.ARR_FLT_SEQ_NO
   and f.BC_M_FLIGHTS = d.DEP_FLT_SEQ_NO
   and (TO_CHAR(a.ARR_FLIGHT_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD') between TO_CHAR(:P_FROM_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD') and TO_CHAR(:P_TO_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD')
    or TO_CHAR(d.DEP_FLIGHT_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD') between TO_CHAR(:P_FROM_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD') and TO_CHAR(:P_TO_DATE,'YYYY/MM/DD')
       )Regards
Etbin
Edited by: Etbin on 2.3.2012 18:44
select column list altered

Simple query builder

Hi,
I'm looking for simple query builder for free using, which is helper for any user, who no experiences with SQL (knows it a little). RDBMS is Oracle 8.0.6
Regards
Krzysztof Malinowski

Hi,
you may use the Oracle Query Builder for such purposes. The Query Builder is a component of the Oracle 6i Forms Developer Suite, which is downloadable here at OTN. The new Oracle 9i Developer Suite DOES NOT contain this product.
Greetings
Werner

Printing simple query

Hello.
I want to create a button that send to the printer a simple query, for example...
select text from orders
where order_id = '735'
My problem is that if I create a page to show this query, and try to print it through the browser "File / Print" command, other elements of the page are printed also.

Hi Earl & everybody:
I was trying to print without loss the format of the
query result, which fit in the boxes in a pre printed
paper.Have you created a form layout that matches your preprinted paper layout then?
When I load the query in the sql query in the form
region, the only way I can show the text in the right
position,
(' < here there are spaces > Sunday, October 15'
' < here there are spaces > Item < here there are
spaces > Description < here there are spaces >
Price')
is modifying the query as
SELECT '<PRE>' || ORDER_ROW || '</PRE>' RG
FROM ORDERS
which shows the right text position in the monospace
font desired.I'm not sure why you're talking about modifying your SQL when you're having a page layout problem?
But, an extra horizontal line is added between rows.
the query result in sqlplus don't have the extra
lines, and if I don't use the '<PRE>' and '</PRE>'
tags in the query neither have the lines.
I'm using a customized page POPUP pattern, with a css
file, because the default patterns don´t displayed
the monospace font.I think you need to put an example up on apex.oracle.com so we can see what you're doing.
Earl

How to improve the performance of adobe forms

Hi,
Please give me some suggestions as to how to improve the performance of adobe form?
Right now when I' am doing user events it is working fine for first 6 or 7 user events. From the next
one it is hanging.
I read about Wizard form design approach, how to use the same here.
Thanks,
Aravind

Hi Otto,
The form is created using HCM forms and processes. I' am performing user events in the form.
User events will doa round trip, in which form data will be sent to backend SAP system. Processing will
happen on the ABAP side and result will appear on the form. First 6 or 7 user events works correctly,
the result is appearing on the form. Around 8 or 9th one, the wait symbol appears and the form is not
re-rendered. The form is of size 6 pages. The issue is not coming with form of size 1 page.
I was reading ways to improve performance during re-rendering given below.
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/livecycle/articles/DynamicInteractiveFormPerformance.pdf
It talks about wizard form design approach. But in SFP transaction, I am not seeing any kind of wizard.
Let me know if you need further details.
Thanks,
Aravind

How to write a simple query.

I have a table where I have data shown below. Now, I want to write a simple query which lists me the project and the count of the distinct effective dates for which data is existant there.
Sample data:
Project Task Effective Date (xx_proj_task_data)
101 T1 01-Jan-2008
101 T1 01-Feb-2008
101 T1 01-Mar-2008
101 T2 01-Jan-2008
101 T2 01-Apr-2008
101 T3 01-Apr-2008
102 T1 01-Jan-2008
102 T1 01-Feb-2008
102 T2 01-Apr-2008
103 T1 01-Jan-2008
103 T1 01-Feb-2008
103 T1 01-Mar-2008
103 T1 01-Apr-2008
103 T2 01-May-2008
103 T3 01-Jun-2008
103 T1 01-Jan-2008
103 T1 01-Aug-2008
103 T2 01-Apr-2008
Output Reqd:
Project Count(Distinct Effective Dates)
101 4
102 3
103 7
I can write a query that says:
select project_id, count(1)
from (select distinct project_id, effective_date
from xx_proj_task_data) x
group by project_id;
But, is there a way I can achieve the same by avoiding the inner Query (x) and just by a simple query ?
Thanks!

Try below query:
select project_id
, count(distinct effective_date)
from xx_proj_task_data
group by project_id;
--venkata

Simple query on perform enperform on form pls asnwere asap

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for