Simple query with like return wrong result

Hi,
I run simple query with like.
If I use parameter I get wrong results.
If I use query without parameter results are ok.
My script:
ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT=BINARY_CI;
ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP=LINGUISTIC;
-- drop table abcd;
create table abcd (col1 varchar2(10));
INSERT INTO ABCD VALUES ('122222');
insert into abcd values ('111222');
SELECT * FROM ABCD WHERE COL1 LIKE :1; -- wrong result with value 12%
COL1
122222
*111222*
select * from abcd where col1 like '12%'; -- result ok
COL1
122222
I use Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
and query run in Oracle SQL Developer 3.1.07.

Hi,
welcome to the forum.
When you put some code please enclose it between two lines starting with {noformat}{noformat}
i.e.:
{noformat}{noformat}
SELECT ...
{noformat}{noformat}
You should specify exactly how you run your code.
If I run this statement in SQL Plus:SQL> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT=BINARY_CI;
Session altered.
SQL> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP=LINGUISTIC;
Session altered.
SQL>
SQL> -- drop table abcd;
SQL> create table abcd (col1 varchar2(10));
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> INSERT INTO ABCD VALUES ('122222');
1 row created.
SQL> insert into abcd values ('111222');
1 row created.
SQL>
SQL> SELECT * FROM ABCD WHERE COL1 LIKE :1;
SP2-0552: Bind variable "1" not declared.
SQL>
I got this error. So I wonder how you set value 12%
Please specify exactly how you run your test as we cannot reproduce your problem.
Regards.
Al                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Similar Messages

  • Simple Query with subquery returns the 'wrong' result

    DB version: 11.2
    We created about 27 schemas in the last 4 days. The below query confirms that.
    SQL > select username, created from dba_users where created > sysdate-4;
    USERNAME                       CREATED
    MANHSMPTOM_DEV_01              12 Jul 2012 11:55:16
    PRSM01_OAT_IAU                 13 Jul 2012 01:51:03
    F_SW                           11 Jul 2012 17:52:42
    FUN_CDD_HK_SIT                 09 Jul 2012 15:33:57
    CEMSCOMPTOM_UAT_01             12 Jul 2012 11:43:45
    STORM02_OAT_IAU                13 Jul 2012 02:06:29
    27 rows selected.  -------------> Truncated outputFrom DBA_TS_QUOTAS.max_bytes column , we can determine the space quota allocated for a user/schema
    SQL > desc dba_ts_quotas
    Name                                      Null?    Type
    TABLESPACE_NAME                           NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
    USERNAME                                  NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
    BYTES                                              NUMBER
    MAX_BYTES                                          NUMBER
    BLOCKS                                             NUMBER
    MAX_BLOCKS                                         NUMBER
    DROPPED                                            VARCHAR2(3)So, I wanted to see the allocated space for the users created in the last 4 days. The below query should return only 27 records because the subquery returns only 27 records. Instead it returned 66 records !
    select username, tablespace_name, max_bytes/1024/1024 quotaInMB
    from dba_ts_quotas
    where username in (select username from dba_users where created > sysdate-4);Any idea why ? I know it is not a bug with oracle. Its just I haven't been eating fish lately.

    Hi,
    J.Kiechle wrote:
    So, I wanted to see the allocated space for the users created in the last 4 days.DBA_TS_QUOTAS doesn't give the allocated space but rather the maximum allowed for a given user.
    J.Kiechle wrote:
    The below query should return only 27 records because the subquery returns only 27 records. Instead it returned 66 records !What if your user John has Quotas on 3 tablespace TBS1, TBS2 and TBS3 ?
    You cannot expect the outer query to only retrieve at most 27 rows just because the inner query returns 27 rows.
    For allocated space by tablespace for recently created users, you'd better query dba_segments. something like :select owner, tablespace_name, trunc(sum(bytes)/1024/1024) alloc_mb
    from dba_segments
    where owner in (select username from dba_users where created > sysdate - 4)
    group by owner, tablespace_name
    order by owner, tablespace_name;

  • SQL query with parameter returns empty result set, please help !!!

    Hi there,
    When I use the following query :
    <sql:query var="beroepsthemas" >
    select *
    from beroepsthemas
    where beroepsthemaid = ?
    <sql:param value="12"/>
    </sql:query>
    When I want to browse the result set with :
    <c:forEach items="${beroepsthemas.rows}" var="rij">
    it shows no records. But it must return at least one.
    All my jsp pages with sql queries and parameters have the same problem.
    This is all on my test environment. I'm using Ubuntu 5.10, Netbeans5.0, JDK 1.5_06, application runs in Bundeled Tomcat 5.5.9, MySQL 4.1.12, mysql-connector3.1.6
    When the same code is run on the live environment, it works just fine.
    The difference is :
    Mysql 4.1.10a, tomcat5.5.9, mysql-connector3.1.6
    What can there be wrong !!

    When the same code is run on the live environment, it
    works just fine.
    The difference is :
    Mysql 4.1.10a, tomcat5.5.9, mysql-connector3.1.6
    I didn't catch this. I think you may need to update the database driver.

  • Wrong result for query with like and %

    I have a strange problem with query with like and %.
    When I run this script:
    ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT = 'BINARY_CI';
    ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP = 'LINGUISTIC';
    -- SELECT * FROM NLS_SESSION_PARAMETERS;
    -- drop table test1;
    CREATE TABLE TEST1(K1 NVARCHAR2(80));
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('gsdk');
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('ąxyz');
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('ŁFa');
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('ła');
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('Śab');
    INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES ('Śrrrb');
    commit;
    select * from TEST1 where k1 like N'Ł%';
    I get this:
    K1
    ŁFa
    ła
    Śab <- WRONG
    Śrrrb <- WRONG
    4 rows selected
    When i change datatype to varchar2 this code work correct.
    Is this a bug or what ?
    The execution plan:
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    SQL_ID d3d64aupz4bb5, child number 2
    select * from TEST1 where k1 like N'Ł%'
    Plan hash value: 4122059633
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 2 (100)| |
    |* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST1 | 1 | 82 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    1 - filter((NLSSORT("K1",'nls_sort=''BINARY_CI''')>=HEXTORAW('014200'
    ) AND NLSSORT("K1",'nls_sort=''BINARY_CI''')<HEXTORAW('01610100') ))
    Note
    - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

    DATABASE NLS CONFIGURATION:
    NLS_CHARACTERSET AL32UTF8
    NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET     AL16UTF16
    NLS_COMP     BINARY
    NLS_SORT     BINARY
    Oracle version 11.2.0.2.0

  • Please Help Urgent:Fast Search returning wrong result sets

    Hi All,
    We are facing below issue with fast search.
    Currently in My project  when  we are searching  for a phrase it is returning wrong result sets.
    For example if we search for “Endura”, It is returning documents related to
    Endura  as well as Centura.
    But the expected results are only Endura documents.
    When we look in to the documents we didn’t find the search term (“Endura” ) either inside document content or in its meta data.
    In order to resolve the issue we tried the below steps
    1-     
    We manually edited and saved the document, to ensure the appropriate Guid association to metadata.
    2-     
    Index reset
    3-     
    Full crawl
    But no luck  so far.
    Please help.Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Subrat

    Subrat,
    This may be related to spellchecking or may be synonym. Spellcheck is based on indexed terms.
    The best test would be to run the queries from qrserver (13280) and then look at the spellcheck query transformations. If spellchecking is not doing it, then you must have a synonym setup .Check your keyword/synonyms from the SharePoint side. 

  • Query returning wrong results - Help required.

    Hi All,
    I am having a query in which I have 10 records, 5 with stop time 1 and 5 with stop time 2.
    I have a scenario in which, I need to calculate the maximum,minimum for the records
    with stop time 1 and 2.
    What I did is, I selected all the 10 records using for loop. Within the loop
    I am trying to find the maximum and minimum. It is giving me wrong results.
    Please help me. My code is follows
    declare
         v_p1_min_stop_tm     number;
         v_p1_max_stop_tm     number;
         v_p2_min_stop_tm     number;
         v_p2_max_stop_tm     number;
    begin
         for i in(
              select
                   stop_tm
              from
                   sample_stop
              where
                   map_nbr = 16645 and
                   stop_dt = '05-sep-08'
         )loop
              if i.stop_tm = 1 then
                   select
                        min(i.stop_tm),
                        max(i.stop_tm)
                   into
                        v_p1_min_stop_tm,
                        v_p1_max_stop_tm
                   from
                        dual;
              elsif i.stop_tm = 2 then
                   select
                        min(i.stop_tm),
                        max(i.stop_tm)
                   into
                        v_p2_min_stop_tm,
                        v_p2_max_stop_tm
                   from
                        dual;
              end if;
         end loop;
         dbms_output.put_line('minimum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_min_stop_tm);
         dbms_output.put_line('maximum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_max_stop_tm);
         dbms_output.put_line('minimum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_min_stop_tm);
         dbms_output.put_line('maximum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_max_stop_tm);
    end;
    My o/p is :
    Minimum P1 stop time : 523
    Maximum P1 stop time : 523
    Minimum P2 stop time : 719
    Maximum P2 stop time : 719
    Here how can I make the data as two sets, one set with stop time 1 and
    other with stop time 2.
    Regards
    Raghu

    If the data type of stop_tm is varchar then try following
    declare
         v_p1_min_stop_tm number;
         v_p1_max_stop_tm number;
         v_p2_min_stop_tm number;
         v_p2_max_stop_tm number;
    begin
         for i in(select  stop_tm  from  sample_stop
              where
                   map_nbr = 16645 and
                   stop_dt = '05-sep-08'
              )loop
         if i.stop_tm = 1 then
              select min(to_number(i.stop_tm)), max(to_number(i.stop_tm))
                   into v_p1_min_stop_tm,v_p1_max_stop_tm
              from
                   dual;
         elsif i.stop_tm = 2 then
              select
                   min(to_number(i.stop_tm)),     max(to_number(i.stop_tm))
                   into
                   v_p2_min_stop_tm,v_p2_max_stop_tm
              from
                   dual;
         end if;
    end loop;
    dbms_output.put_line('minimum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_min_stop_tm);
    dbms_output.put_line('maximum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_max_stop_tm);
    dbms_output.put_line('minimum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_min_stop_tm);
    dbms_output.put_line('maximum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_max_stop_tm);
    end;
    / Regards
    Singh

  • JPA, Toplink, Query with getSingleResult returns Vector, should it?

    I don't understand why when I do a simple query "Select count(*) From ...." and get use the EntityManager my code is something like this:
    getEntityManager().createNativeQuery(sql).getSingleResult()
    and what I get is a Vector object that has inside a BigDecimal object. I wonder how portable this is if I use hibernate. I bought a book that was written by a couple of guys from Oracle and their example returns a Object array instead of a Vector even when getResultList() function is called.
    I can't find any documentation where it indicates what is returned from getSingleResult() and getResultList().
    Any help from any gurus are most welcomed....

    Bug 2219 (https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2219 ) deals with native queries not returning the correct types unless it is to return an entity or results specified using a ResultRetMapping.
    Michael's blog examples are all using JPQL which do not have this problem, so you could switch to using JPQL to get the proper results as well.
    Best Regards,
    Chris

  • Problem with sdo_relate returning unexpected results

    I am having a problem with an oracle spatial query not returning what I feel is an appropriate result.
    I have a bounding box that has 6 points from a table that should be inside it. There are several hundred points total in this table. I perform the following query and oracle returns only 4 points, well 5 but we will get to that later, within the area of the search.
    SQL> Select feature_id
    From city_points A
    where (MDSYS.SDO_RELATE(A.GEOM, mdsys.sdo_geometry(2003, 8307, NULL, mdsys.sdo_elem_info_array(1,1003,1), mdsys.sdo_ordinate_array(-101.8417,-52.8083,-23.8417,-52.8083,-23.8417,-13.8083,-101.8417,-13.8083,101.8417,-52.8083)), 'mask=ANYINTERACT querytype=join') = 'TRUE');
    I used a different application to perform the same type of query. The difference is that the application does the spatial query, not oracle. Further the application gets all of the points and performs this query on the client. What the application returns is correct both visually and spatially.
    Two of the points not returned in the oracle spatial query are 300km inside the bounding box. This far exceeds the .5 m tolerance used in our decimal degrees data set (SRID 8307).
    I have experienced this problem on 9.2.0.1. I then patched that instance to 9.2.0.7 and duplicated the problem. I then exported the data and imported into a 10g release 1 database and again duplicated the problem. I have tried to re-index the data to no avail.
    I have also tried different querytypes also yielding less than expected results.
    The data looks like this:
    243
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-58.45, -34.6, NULL),NULL, NULL)
    254
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-56.18333, -34.883334, NULL), NULL, NULL)
    377
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-70.666671, -33.449999, NULL), NULL, NULL)
    385
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-68.149999, -16.5, NULL), NULL, NULL)
    388
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-47.916667, -15.783333, NULL), NULL, NULL)
    427
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-57.640066, -25.270295, NULL), NULL, NULL)
    The number is the id field, the rest is the geometry.
    The oracle spatial query above only returns id #s 359, 377,243,254,427
    There are five returned records. The extra value is outside the bounding area. So it should not have been returned at all. It is all too strange.
    I have seen this with different geometry types (points lines and area) as well.
    If anyone has suggestions, I would appreciate your comments.
    Thanks,
    John

    John,,
    What you are seeing is the behavior you should expect in the geodetic space.
    When you have a very long line connecting from longitude -101 to -23, that line
    does not follow the same latitude value.
    Since these points are in southern hemisphere, the line connecting them
    will curve downward (this is the great circle line).
    If you really want a line connecting with constant latitude, you should
    use the MBR type for the window geometry which densifies the
    lines along constant latitude before passing it into relate.
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, 8307, NULL,
    sdo_elem_info_array(1,1003,3),
    sdo_ordinate_array(-101.8417,-52.8083, 23.8417,-13.8083))
    siva

  • CONNECT BY query doesn't return any results...

    Hi All
    I am trying to execute this CONNECT BY query...but it does not return any result.
    Could anyone please suggests what am I doing wrong. Or how should I modify the query to get the results.
    SELECT Distinct dt.DID FROM DEPT dt left outer join EMPLOYEE emp on dt.DID = emp.DID WHERE dt.parentid in (SELECT DEPT.DID FROM DEPT CONNECT BY PRIOR DEPT.DID = DEPT.PARENTID START WITH DEPT.PARENTID in (2000,-2000)) or dt.parentid=2000
    Any help would be really really appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards
    -Josef

    Take the nested query and run it in SQL developer (or SQL Plus) against the database directly. Does it give any results? That query returning no results is the most likely cause of the problem.

  • [HELP] AGO function return wrong result

    Hi, i try to implement ago function in OBIEE, but the result is not as expected. Please help me to configure Time Dimension to get this work.
    My case:
    - I have a time dimension with this configuration:
    [http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii176/necrombi/NEO/1-1.png]
    Time Hierarchy: Total > Year > Quarter > Month > Day
    Year:
    Primary key: Calendar_year_cal_year_code
    Chronological key: Does not define
    Quarter:
    Primary key: Calendar_quarter_description
    Chronological key: Does not define
    Month:
    Primary key: Calendar_month_description
    Chronological key: Calendar_month_description
    Day:
    Primary key: Dimension_key
    Chronological key: Day_day_code
    My ago function: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", 1)
    I do not understand why i get this wrong results:
    [http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii176/necrombi/NEO/2.png]
    Does anyone know how to solve this?
    Edited by: 864451 on Jun 8, 2011 5:11 AM

    Hi, thanks for your reply.
    I implemented Time dimension with your recommend, and have time dimension like this:
    Time Hierarchy: Total > Year > Quarter > Month > Day
    Year:
    Primary key: Calendar_year_start_date
    Chronological key: Calendar_year_start_date
    Quarter:
    Primary key: Calendar_quarter_start_date
    Chronological key: Calendar_quarter_start_date
    Month:
    Primary key: Calendar_month_start_date
    Chronological key: Calendar_month_start_date
    Day:
    Primary key: Day
    Chronological key: Dimension_key
    And Ago function works fine with month level: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", n)
    But return sum result of 12 month with: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."year", 1)
    In my case, i just use AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", 12) to get year ago value. But i still don't understand clearly about OBIEE Time Serries functions.
    Thanks,
    Dung Nguyen

  • Query with Top N Condition (Result Row)

    Hi,
    I made a query with an active top n condition. The query has 2 Keyfigures and 1 formula
    Gross-sales acutal | Gross-sales previous year | Previous Year %
    So that to result line is correct, I had to say "Calculate result as summation" for the keyfigures
    gross sales actual and gross sales previous year. That works.
    I have the problem with my formula. the formular for previous year % is defined as follows:
    gross sales actual %A gross sales previous year
    Example Top 3 Customer
                        gross sales actual          gross sales prev. year         prev. year %
    Cust 1          100                                   80                                       125 %
    Cust 2          90                                     45                                        200 %
    Cust 3           80                                    60                                        133 %
    Result          270                                   185                                       142.8 % ( 350 * 100 / 245 )
    The result of 142 % is the correct result without the condition top 3. with the top 3 condition
    the result should be 270 * 100 / 185 = 145.9 %
    Additional customer without top 3 condition
    Cust 4          50                                       40                                        125 %
    Cust 5          30                                        20                                        150 %
    It shows the correct result for each single line. The result in the result row is wrong. it is calculated
    without taking the active condition. the formular calculates
    with the total gross sales actual and the total of gross sales prev. year.
    is there any solution the achieve the correct % in the result row?
    thanks for your help.
    Pascal

    Pascal,this is a known behavior with conditions.When you apply condition it just hide the extra rows and it does not impact the result row.So your result row actually shows the value irrespective of the condition you apply.
    Now with the help of local functions like calculate result as summation you can show the correct sum after applying the condition but when you try to use that result in some calculation then it takes the original value thereby discarding the calculated value.
    Same is happening in your case as well.Its taking the original value i.e 350 and not the calculated sum after condition i.e 270.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    AL

  • Query with XMLTABLE returns null rows

    Hello all,
    I'm trying a query with XMLTABLE, but even thought the number of returned rows is correct, the row content is (null).
    DB version is: 10.2.0.4.0
    Here is my query;
    SELECT s.DESCRIPTION
    FROM EXECUTIONPLAN p,
      XMLTABLE
      ('//executionPlan/executionPlanItems/summary'  
       PASSING p.DATA
       COLUMNS
         DESCRIPTION VARCHAR(250) PATH '/taskId'
      ) s
    WHERE
    trunc(extractValue(data, '/executionPlan/executionPlanHeader/statusChanged')) = to_date('2010-03-05','YYYY-MM-DD');Sorry the XML content is quite big -50k lines at average- so can't post the whole XML, but to give an idea;
    /executionPlan
       /executionPlan
          /executionPlanHeader
             /statusChanged
             /x
             /y
          /executionPlanItems
             /summary
                /taskId
             /summary
             /summary
             ...The result looks like;
    1 (null)
    2 (null)
    3 (null)
    4 (null)
    ...Suggestions are very much appreciated :)
    Cheers

    Hi guys,
    Cracked it at last. It seems the column definition part does not like the forward slash in front of it. The following works;
    SELECT s.DESCRIPTION
    FROM EXECUTIONPLAN p,
      XMLTABLE
      ( XmlNamespaces(DEFAULT 'http://www.staffware.com/frameworks/gen/valueobjects'),
       '/executionPlan/executionPlanItems/summary'  
       PASSING p.DATA
       COLUMNS
         DESCRIPTION VARCHAR(250) PATH 'taskId'
      ) s
    WHERE
    trunc(extractValue(p.data, '/executionPlan/executionPlanHeader/statusChanged'
                             , 'xmlns="http://www.staffware.com/frameworks/gen/valueobjects"')) = to_date('2010-03-05','YYYY-MM-DD');I'm not sure if this is the way it is intended since it seems a bit weird to me and is not in line with the docs - or at least my understanding of them.
    Thanks for taking the time to help out. Now on to coding :)

  • Spotlight returns wrong results

    After installing Yosemite on my MacBook Pro, I tried to use Spotlight on some simple searches, with startling results. For example, I looked for Spotlight help...and a Word for Mac file opened. I recognize that Spotlight scours my Mac for material, but I do not understand why it would open a file that has nothing to do with the search terms.
    Can anyone hazard a guess about what may be happening?

    Did it and it worked to add _spotlight to the ACLs but Spotlight still return blank results on AFP clients...
    Do you know what should be the permissions on the .spotlight-V100 folder?
    Spotlight works on the servers so the index is fine. It's the AFP clients that can't read it properly or don't get all the data from it.

  • Query with a condition - Overall results row displays incorrect value

    Hi All,
    I have a bw query with top 40 conditions. However, The Overall Result Row Figures Do Not Equal The Sum of the Column Rows.
    Although the top condition is activated, the overall result still displays the overall result of the whole report.
    I have 3 columns in the report
    Selected Period
    Prior Period and
    Variance
    The formula for variance is (Selected Period/Prior Period)-1.
    Does anyone have an idea to fix this?
    Thank you so much in advance.
    Have a great day!

    Hi Gaurav,
    Thank you so much for your reply, however this does not solve fully the issue.
    Changing the properties to "Summation" will indeed provide me with the correct sum for the "selected period" and "Prior Period." However what I need in the Overall Result Row for the "Variance" column is not the total but instead the value when the total of Selected Period is divided by Prior Period then minus 1.
    Overall Variance = (Overall Selected Period/Overall Prior Period)-1
    Do you know a way to make this possible.
    Thank you so much.

  • SSAS source Query, Simple Query with never ending refresh time.

    Hello...
    A very simple query based on SSAS cube do not give answer. :-(
    I start a trace to see the exact mdx statement transmited to SSAS, run it in a query editor, the result is... immediate !
    Is there any clue to explain such a behavior ? cube meta data definition ?
    Any help is welcome
    ===========
    Version: 2.21.3974.242

    hello,
    find below the capture of the trace, cannot see any references to rowsets either cellsets...
    thank you for your help
    select{[Measures].[Fact Count]}on 0,nonempty(crossjoin([Invoice Attributes].[Scenario].[Scenario].allmembers,[Period Date].[Month].[Month].allmembers,[Period Date].[Quarter].[Quarter].allmembers,[Period Date].[Year].[Year].allmembers,[Product Line Techno].[Product
    Line Code].[Product Line Code].allmembers),{[Measures].[Fact Count]})properties member_caption,member_unique_name on 1 from(select([Invoice Attributes].[Scenario].&[ACTUALS],[Period Date].[Month].&[20150101],[Product Line Techno].[Product Line Code].&[EB])on
    0 from [Revenue Detailed])cell properties value
    <PropertyList xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-analysis">
              <Catalog>OLAP12</Catalog>
              <SspropInitAppName>Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio - Query</SspropInitAppName>
              <LocaleIdentifier>1036</LocaleIdentifier>
              <ClientProcessID>5992</ClientProcessID>
              <Format>Native</Format>
              <AxisFormat>TupleFormat</AxisFormat>
              <Content>SchemaData</Content>
              <Timeout>0</Timeout>
              <DbpropMsmdActivityID>284bd120-34f1-4fac-83cb-e8cf443261ad</DbpropMsmdActivityID>
              <DbpropMsmdRequestID>f11764e9-b092-41ea-aae6-a91763960eae</DbpropMsmdRequestID>
            </PropertyList>

Maybe you are looking for

  • Universe Created by Integration gives error

    Following workflow is describing the problem: When creating a universe on a SAP/BI query, the objects are generated automatically A parse is executed afterwards to check the object syntax.  This parse reveals one problem with a filter object that is

  • Java.lang.NullPointerException (can't figure out why...)

    500 Internal Server Error java.lang.NullPointerException      at oracle.adfinternal.controller.application.AdfcViewScopeProvider.getViewScope(AdfcViewScopeProvider.java:39)      at oracle.adf.view.rich.context.AdfFacesContext.getViewScope(AdfFacesCon

  • Handling Transaction in Stateful Session Bean

    I wrote a public method like public void doTransaction() it will call 2 private method, like: methodA and methodB Both private methods have db accesss statement and will update the db. They got different db connection and will close the connection wh

  • Anyone else having trouble with FCPX crashing after the OSX update?

    Anyone else having trouble with FCPX crashing after the OSX update? It NEVER crashed until the update. The night before last it crashed 20 times in 45 minutes. I can't finish my project because of it. Retina, Mid 2012 Processor  2.3 GHz Intel Core i7

  • InDesign CS6 + native 64-bit

    Hi, I hope you don´t mind my bad english ... Does anybody know if InDesign CS6 will have native 64-bit-support? In CS5.5 there are only Photoshop, After Effects and I think another one with native 64-bit-support, but not InDesign. I have CS5 (Design