Single Bitmap for Aggregate calculation

Hi,
I am aggregating a few of my dimensions and Essbase is taking only a single bitmap and taking about 6min to my aggregating which is not ok. Here are the details;
Number of dimensions=13
Dense Dimensions
D1
D2
D3
D4
Block Size = 1376256 B
Aggregating Sparse Dimensions and number of members
SA1=19
SA2=28
SA3=56
SA4=245
SA5=382
SA6=384
Non-Aggregating Sparse Dimensions and number of members
S1=2
S2=5
S3=34
Order of Dimensions
D1
D2
D3
D4
SA1
SA2
SA3
SA4
SA5
SA6
S1
S2
S3
So I have my order of dimensions good.
Caches
Index=8000 K
Data = 300000 k
So essentially I can fit 111 blocks in my Data Cache, all good.
My Calc cache is 200MB!
Heres the calc scripts I am running;
//ESS_LOCALE English_UnitedStates.Latin1@Binary
SET MSG SUMMARY;
SET CACHE HIGH;
SET UPDATECALC OFF;
SET LOCKBLOCK Default;
SET AGGMISSG ON;
SET CALCPARALLEL 2;
SET CREATENONMISSINGBLK OFF;
FIX(USA,USD, General)
AGG("Employee Grade",Futures,"cost Centers",Trials,"Employee");
ENDFIX
So, I am only trying to fit SA1, SA2, SA3, SA4 and SA5 in my bitmap, I am fixing on a single member from SA6.
So, my bitmap size=19*28*56*245*382/8=348529160 B~332MB
Number of bitmaps =40
So my required calc cache= 332*40 =13280 MB which much later than the max Calc Cache of 200MB!
Is there anything else I can do to further reduce my aggreagating time?
Appreciate your responses!
Thanks

I found I made an error in calculating the calc cache
So, I am only trying to fit SA1, SA2, SA3, SA4 in my bitmap as my bitmap dimensions, as SA5 becomes the anchoring dimension and I am fixing on a single member from SA6 (sparse dimension).
So, my bitmap size=19*28*56*245/8=912380 B = 0.87 MB
Number of bitmaps =40
So my required calc cache= 0.87*40 =34 MB which much "SMALLER" than the max Calc Cache of 200MB!
So, why is Essbase still using a single bitmap? Have I calculated this wrong or am I missing something?
I would really like to reduce this calc time?
Please suggest!
Thanks

Similar Messages

BUG? Invalid use of an Aggregate Calculation

Please Help:
I am trying to create a mandatory Filter in a BU that is
COUNT_DISTINCT(ID) > 3;
When Mandatory an error pops up:
Invalid use of an Aggregate Calculation
If Optional filter works and can be used in a workbook.
This should be allowed. The filter will require that all rows be based on at least 4 Individuals (required for privacy) and no single individual be retrieved.
Is this expected behavior?
Thanks
A
Platform:
iAS10g (904) Solaris
iDS10g (904) Win

Just a follow-up: I did post a TAR.
Yes this feature is documented, AND no it is not important enough to change. (I added the last part of commentary).
I will post a snip of the TAR just in case others run afoul of this "Feature".
==============================================
17-MAY-04 15:45:48 GMT
UPDATE:
~~~~~~~
A:
Unfortunately you cannot use analytic functions in Mandatory conditions, you can see this in the Oracle Discoverer Administrator Administration Guide, I'm copying what is documented and the complete reference:
"When you create a condition based on an analytic function (i.e. a function that computes aggregate values based on a group of rows), you must designate the condition Type as optional. If you choose mandatory, a message is displayed informing you that analytic functions are not allowed in mandatory conditions."
"What restrictions apply to aggregate calculated items?
When creating aggregate calculated items, note that a number of restrictions apply to aggregate calculations. Aggregate calculated items:
cannot be used in a mandatory condition
From:
Oracle® Discoverer Administrator
Administration Guide
10g (9.0.4)
Part No. B10270-01
Chapters:
11. Creating and maintaining conditions, page 11-6
10. Creating and maintaining calculated items,
Section: What restrictions apply to aggregate calculated items?, page 10-4
A way to workaround this, could be creating a view in the database based on the select count distinct, then create a folder in your Bussines Area using that view and create the Mandatory condition based on that Folder.
Let me know if you have any additional questions regarding this.
Best regards.
TECH
STATUS:
~~~~~~~~~~
@CUS (Waiting for Customer)
17-MAY-04 15:45:59 GMT
17-MAY-04 20:00:00 GMT
New info :
We will be unable to use Discoverer, again. This may be the last chance for its Implementation in our Organization. With Apache, Tomcat, php, etc, it is looking bad for Oracle Application Server in general.
Thanks for your help.
A
END OF TAR Communications

Dynamic creation of single reports for characteristic value combinations

Dear Experts,
We have a report showing the monthly sales from one reporting unit (RU) to another u2013 see example below:
RU 1, RU 2, Sales 100
RU 1, RU 3, Sales 60
RU 2, RU 1, Sales 20
RU 2, RU 3, Sales 40
There is a requirement to automatically generate single reports for each combination of RUs selling to each other and broadcast these reports automatically by mail:
Report 1:
RU 1, RU 2, Sales 100
Report 2:
RU 1, RU 3, Sales 60
Report 3:
RU 2, RU 1, Sales 20
Report 4:
RU 2, RU 3, Sales 40
Of course it would be possible to create single reports for each combination using fixed filter values. But we need a dynamic calculation because there are not always sales for each combination. Moreover this would be difficult to maintain, because each time a new reporting unit has been created, new reports have to be created as well. We are looking for a completely dynamic solution,
Maybe there is a way to solve it with the BEx Broadcaster function u201Cprecalculation of value setsu201D or u201Cburstingu201D. But we unfortunately do not have any experience with this.
Thanks a lot in advance for your help!
Best regards
Marco

Hi,
Using the bursting functionality in the broadcaster this is possible. I think you would want to send the reports from RU1 to RU2 and RU1 to RU3 to a recipient linked to RU1 or somehting. In that case you need to add an attribute email to the RU infoObject. In the bursting settings you can use that value to determine the recipient of the email. Furthermore, you can automatically split the resultset to receiving reporting unit.
If you have any specific questions regarding this subject, let me know.
Kind regards,
Alex

Create a single delivery for different schedule lines in the scheduling agr

Hi
I want to create a single delivery for different line items with different delivery dates in the scheduling agreement, as Iam aware it is possible to combine different line items into one delivery through sales order.
Need your inputs
Aravind

Hi,
Try with below solution and see I am not confirm about this
VL01N >>> Menu outbound delivery >>> Deliver sales order
Here you put order number and selected date as your ANOTHER SCHEDULE LINE
Kapil

Single invoice for multiple orders with different divisions

Dear All,
while I am trying to do single invoice for muliple orders with different divisons invoice is gettting splitted..In copy control vbrk routine I tried with 003 and 007 etc..but result is same..what configuration need to be done for getting the single invoice
Thanks In advance
Regards
CNRNAIR

Hello
single invoice for multiple orders with "different divisions" invoice is getting split
FYI - Different Division means different Sales Area.
So, sales doc (whether sales order, Delivery & Billing) is applicable to EXACTLY one sales area.
Thus, combining docs with different sales area is practically impossible.
Provided, you are using common division.
Hope this assist you,
Thanks & REgards
JP

Single invoice for multiple payment terms

Hi Friends,
I have given 2 different payment terms for 2 line items in single order and the billing is splitted due to this reason. I want to know where the system is checking this control. Because I want to create single Invoive even the payment terms are different. (The routine 003 under Data VBRK/VBRP in SO to Bill copy controls will be usefull only to create single Invoice for multiple SO's where the payment terms is same). But I need to create single Invoice even for multiple payment terms.
Can anyone suggest me at the earliest please.
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
The Billing Split is take care at Copy control level.
For multiple line items in one single SO, with different Payment terms is not acceptable as per the business logic and its not best practices.
Please suggest the business to go on Split method only.
Or
Try to use Proforma Invoice Concept.
Regards
Srini

Single invoice for multiple deliveries in Export scenario

Hi All
I am trying to create a single invoice for multiple deliveries. In case of Local Sales i am able to do it.
But when it comes to export sales the system is not allowing me to create Single invoice for 2 deliveries . This is a export scenario. Can you suggest... When i am checking the split invoice log it says split due to header data "Number of foreign trade data i"
Plz suggest.
Thanks
Rishi

Thanks G. Lakshmipathi
Resolved
As per the split analysis, System was checking the number generated for Foreign Trade data at delivery level.
As told i have Tried maintaining the Indication at copy control level VTFL "Redetermination of Foreign Trade Data at Billing level".
This has resolved my Issue.
Thanks Again
Rishi

Single invoice for Multiple Purchase Orders

Hi,
How to Park the single invoice for multiple purchase orders

brother this is possible to enter one Invoice fro multiple purchase order.
call transaction MIR7, select " purchase order/Scheduling Agreement" from the PO refernce Tab. then click on arrow. give your purchase orders here.
Thanks

Single email for a multiple steps Job

Hello,
Is it possible to send output from 2 steps in a single job in a single email? I have setup a job that has 2 steps and I have defined the recipient email address in the spool list recipient in SM36 but SAP sends 2 separate emails for these steps instead of a single email.
Are there any way to send a single email for the job instead of a email for each step?
Thanks in advance.
Mariano.

Hi Mariano,
I have already replied to your query in ABAP General Section.
Please avoid posting multiple posts. Its against the SDN Rules & Regulations.
Thanks,
Babu Kilari

Single spool for multiple smartforms

Hi,
I am using Function modules SSF_open and ssf_close for creating single spool for multiple smartforms but when i try to run the program in background then the job is getting cancelled...........and if i run the program in foreground then the program is running fine giving single spool for multiple forms........
so the problem is that job should run in background if i run it in background instead job is getting cancelled.
please tell me the solution how can i get the single spool for and multiple smartforms as well as the job should run if i am doing so.

Moved to the correct forum

HT1660 how can I use one single library for all users on the same laptop?

how can I use one single library for all users on the same laptop?

You are most of the way there. Each user having access to hard drive is the key. If users are limited in file privileges this is harder.
Any files you add to your library and any files she adds to her library are available to the other. Just not automatically. Each user must add the files to their own library using the add file or add folder option from menu bar.
What I have done is set library location to a location outside of My Documents\My Music. On my network storage I have a folder names s:\itunes. Both accounts iTunes are set to use this location for the library.

How to use single eventhandler for all menuitems...

Hi all,
I have a tray with a popup.
Currently I have an eventhandler for every single menuitem.
Is it also possible to provide only a single eventhandler for all of the menuitems and determine the clicked entry with the event??
Tried to use parameter mapping but onAction doesn't provide any parameters... Or am i wrong?!
Additionally, is there a list populated where I can find provided parameters for mapping?!
Thanks in advance for replies.
Bastian
Message was edited by: Bastian Schnorbus

Bastian,
This is possible via parameter mapping.
1. Set same action for every menu item;
2. Add parameter, say "id" of type string to action;
3. In wdDoModifyView write the following:
if (firstTime)
IWDMenuActionItem itm;
itm = (IWDMenuActionItem)view.getElementById("<id-of-menu-item>");
itm.mappingOfOnAction.addParameter( "id", itm.getId() );
/* repeat for all items */
4. In view handler you now can dispatch by "id" parameter received;
Valery Silaev
EPAM Systems
http://www.NetWeaverTeam.com

How to use single button for different operations

Hi
I am using one button with image having 4 controls like left right up and down...
How to use the single button for 4 different operations??
Is there any way of defining hotspots on single button to do four different operations...
Please have a look at the attached image, u can understand my problem better...
Please let me know ASAP...
Thanks and Regards
Aruna.S.N.

Here ya go:
http://code.google.com/p/flexlib/wiki/ComponentList
If this post answers your question or helps, please mark it as such.

Using a Single Library for Entire Site and When to Use Subsites

I'm hoping a discussion I am having with my coworkers can be solved. We are trying to decide two things:
Should the entire office be under a single site or should each division have their own site? Our Office has 5 divisions that contain 17 Branches, one site for business functions and one top-level site for the entire office.
Is it standard practice to create one huge library managed by metadata or should there be multiple libraries? I tend to think one library will be too hard to manage with regard to metadata and site columns and that libraries should be based on business
functions or subject domains (i.e., SOPs, Quality Documents, Business Documents, Technical Documents, etc).
Currently, several workflows, libraries and lists have already been created under our business functions site. In order to house everything under a single site, we would need to change the name of the site and move everything under it. I'm not
sure if changing the name of the existing site will cause problems.
I group these two items together because they really seem related. With everything under a single site, individual libraries, lists and workflows could get out of hand as everyone tries to manage their own division. But then so would a single
library for everyone. The problem with more than one site is that data cannot flow freely between sites (via workflows) and search would be less effective so some are against separate sites. So knowing one question may affect the answer for the
other.
Any thoughts on our library and site structure would be appreciated. Thanks.

As always the usual SharePoint consultant cop-out answer of 'it depends' is correct.
Having said that there are certain trends that are quite relevant:
It isn't common to use a single site collection for all sites. It can be done but it often leads to a state where you have a single monstrous site collection which is harder to backup, recover and maintain (see the boundaries and limits documents). The
default behaviour in most cases is to have a central 'shared' site collection then one per <group> where Group is a team that works on the same content, has broadly the same area of interest and access. That might be one for HR, one for the Support team,
one for the Sales team etc.
In terms of libraries there's a wide variation. If there' no difference in views, security and metadata then keeping the library count down is generally a good thing. However using multiple libraries can make life easier and better for users by allowing
more useful views, more secure by locking down libraries rather than using item level permissions (always a nightmare) and allowing more useful alerts and so on.
SharePoint architecture is a science but it's a really, really hard one to formulate into If/Then rules. So, broadly answering your questions I would lean towards multiple site collections and I generally agree with you on point 2, although if there's only
a small number of documents and simple structure then a single library might still make sense.

Can I create a single PO for two company codes

Hi
Can I create a single PO for two company codes. Though I know that Company code is assigned at header level but still I know there is a setting in controlling which when activated two company codes under same controlling area can procure the goods under the same PO.But i forget from where to activate that message or control in config.
Thanks

Hi Lekhram,
I'm just beginner so maybe I got the wrong end of the stick.
If you order something that something must belong to a definite company > plant. How could possess two company the same thing at the same time (totally)?
(companies are at the same organisational level - none of them is subject to the other).
Maybe I'm mistaken.
So I <b>guess</b> you can use only one company code for one PO.
Controlling area & company code
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/e5/077a704acd11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/08/513f4b43b511d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Purchasing & organisation
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee0a9555c811d189900000e8322d00/frameset.htm
All the best
Csaba

Single Bitmap for Aggregate calculation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for