Slow AdvancedDataGrid rendering

Hello -
I have a project that uses an AdvancedDataGrid with over 60
dynamically generated columns, grouped dynamically (there are three
sub groupings above each actual colum), and fed with Hierarchical
data. So each row of my ADG will expand one level to reveal another
set of rows: Usually 5 at a time.
This means, currently I'm drawing about 300 cells with
colored backgrounds.
Initially I used a Box for my custom item renderer to draw
the colored backgrounds but found that the grid timed out when
rendered. By switching to extend the AdvancedDataGridItemRenderer I
picked up a SIGNIFICANT performance improvement. I set my
background color in the set data( ) method of the item renderer.
For the grouping column that expands, I use something derived from
AdvancedDataGridGroupItemRenderer, coupled with setting the
groupLabelFunction function.
I overrode the AdvancedDataGridColumn to provide a custom
dataTip function. Beyond that, I let default behavior happen.
So what I'm noticing is that when I expand or contract the
tree it takes a second or two of waiting before it draws. The set
data( ) gets called on just about everything in the grid each time.
Is this timing expected for my number of grouped columns and cells?
I get the impression that others have larger tables with no lag. So
maybe I'm missing something.
I've been reading all sorts of thing to improve the
performance. Eventually this table will be much much larger. By the
time the application is fully mature, I will be responsible for
displaying up to 20,000 colored cells. So I worry about having this
not be usable as more data hits it.
Initially I was setting the color in the validateNow
function of the renderer. Moving it to setData and not overriding
validateNow helped. What else do people suggest?
So - to summarize:
1) Should I be seeing a lag at all with 300 data points and
60 grouped columns?
2) What are other things to look for to make this faster
rendering?
Thank you all,
Joel

"dalejoel" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:[email protected]...
> Hello -
>
> I have a project that uses an AdvancedDataGrid with over
60 dynamically
> generated columns, grouped dynamically (there are three
sub groupings
> above
> each actual colum), and fed with Hierarchical data. So
each row of my ADG
> will
> expand one level to reveal another set of rows: Usually
5 at a time.
>
> This means, currently I'm drawing about 300 cells with
colored
> backgrounds.
>
> Initially I used a Box for my custom item renderer to
draw the colored
> backgrounds but found that the grid timed out when
rendered. By switching
> to
> extend the AdvancedDataGridItemRenderer I picked up a
SIGNIFICANT
> performance
> improvement. I set my background color in the set data(
) method of the
> item
> renderer. For the grouping column that expands, I use
something derived
> from
> AdvancedDataGridGroupItemRenderer, coupled with setting
the
> groupLabelFunction
> function.
>
> I overrode the AdvancedDataGridColumn to provide a
custom dataTip
> function.
> Beyond that, I let default behavior happen.
>
> So what I'm noticing is that when I expand or contract
the tree it takes a
> second or two of waiting before it draws. The set data(
) gets called on
> just
> about everything in the grid each time. Is this timing
expected for my
> number
> of grouped columns and cells? I get the impression that
others have larger
> tables with no lag. So maybe I'm missing something.
>
> I've been reading all sorts of thing to improve the
performance.
> Eventually
> this table will be much much larger. By the time the
application is fully
> mature, I will be responsible for displaying up to
20,000 colored cells.
> So I
> worry about having this not be usable as more data hits
it.
>
> Initially I was setting the color in the validateNow
function of the
> renderer. Moving it to setData and not overriding
validateNow helped. What
> else
> do people suggest?
>
> So - to summarize:
> 1) Should I be seeing a lag at all with 300 data points
and 60 grouped
> columns?
> 2) What are other things to look for to make this faster
rendering?
I'd either go with a style function or move it to
commitProperties and set a
flag in set data and call invalidateProperties(). There's a
lightweight
itemRenderer in my extended datagrid with style function you
might want to
look at. It doesn't include icon functionality, but you can
look at it for
the types of things you might want to do.
http://flexdiary.blogspot.com/2008/09/extended-datagrid-with-stylefunction.html
HTH;
Amy

Similar Messages

  • Adobe Photoshop CS6 Very Slow On Rendering Type

    I have a notebook with specification as mentioned below :
    Lenovo Ideapad Y470P
    2nd generation Intel Core i7-2670QM Processor( 2.2GHz 1333MHz 6MB)
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    AMD Radeon HD 7690 2GB
    8.0GB PC3-10600 DDR3 SDRAM 1333 MHz
    750GB 5400
    I'm using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit) for doing my job.
    Right now, i have a task to create a banner with dimension 800 x 900 Centimeters with Resolution 300 DPI and Color Mode RGB 16 Bit.
    The file size when blank is about 56.1 GB.
    The problem is, when i add some text with Horizontal Type Tool and click on the Move Tool, the Rendering Type screen show up and take a very very long time to finished.
    I have made some configurations to my Photoshop that i found on Adobe Forum, but the problem still persisted.
    Some configurations that i've made is :
    - Turn off the Automatically Save Recovery Information
    - Set Maximize PSD and PSB File Compatibility to Ask
    - Set the Memory Usage to 95%
    - Set the Cache Levels to 8 and Cache Tile Size to 1024K
    - Set the Graphics Advanced Settings to Drawing Mode Advanced, and Check the option Use Graphics Processor To Accelerate Computation, and Uncheck the option Anti-Alias and 30 Bit Display
    - Set the Scratch Disk to another partition ( C:System D:PageFile E:Data F:Scratch Disk)
    And after all of that configuration, my Photoshop still slow when Rendering Type.
    Could you give me some tips to solve my problem?
    Thanks

    300 ppi for a banner that size is categorically not normal.  Guaranteed. 
    Get specific instructions from the shop that is going to print it.
    You keep confusing ppi with dpi.  The resolution of an image file really is expressed in ppi, pixels per inch, not "dpi" which is dots per inch.  The precise terminology is as follows:
    DPI = Dots per inch = units used to measure the resolution of a printer
    LPI = Lines per inch = The offset printing 'lines' or dots per inch in a halftone or line screen.
    PPI = Pixels per inch = the number of pixels per inch in screen/scanner file terms.
    Here's a link to a discussion that may interest you:
    http://graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/questions/487/what-ppi-should-a-large-format-artwor k-for-print-be-done-at
    It includes the following chart and subsequent comments :
    "The rule of thumb is that we need 1.5 to 2 times the LPI in PPI to get acceptable results.
    "Viewing Distance   Present Study    
    20 feet    greater than 10 LPI  
    18 feet    18.75 LPI or greater 
    16 feet    18.75 LPI or greater 
    14 feet    37.5 LPI or greater  
    12 feet    37.5 LPI or greater  
    10 feet    50 LPI or greater    
    8 feet     65 LPI or greater    
    6 feet     85 LPI or greater    
    4 feet     100 LPI or greater   
    2 feet     133 LPI or greater   
    1 foot     150 LPI or greater   
    6 inches   150 LPI or greater
    "Presumably, for a banner 3m x 5m, you'd be standing at a minimum of, say, 10 feet. (Just eyeballing the wall here.) So, by this table, you'll need 50 LPI minimum. That would mean your raster graphics should be about 100 PPI, or 75 PPI at 12-14 feet. Considering that and the fact that 2x LPI is pretty conservative for reproducing fidelity (often 1.5xLPI is "enough"), this agrees with [the given] advice of 75 PPI being acceptable."
    Talk to your printer.  I suspect they will want a file at under 75 ppi, or even much less.  Follow the printer's advice/request.

  • Slower pdf rendering since v26?

    I noticed a slower PDF rendering (iOS) on v26 compared to earlier versions. Did anyone have same behaviors?

    I would suspect you have not tried reading a .PDF file on your Windows 10 TP system because there is in fact a WindowsApp called Reader as noted by MakeMeLaugh that does indeed read .PDF files.
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. ”

  • Slow page rendering due to a LOV!

    I was trying to figure out what the cause of my slow page rendering was and looking at the debug results I figured for one of my page items which is a LOV I get:
    0.18800     13.98400     ...Session State: Save "P2_CATEGORY" - saving same value: "4"consistantly taking around 14 seconds.
    I have even simplified the LOV to type static, and it only has 6 values. There is only one computation for this item which is static assignment only when the value of item is null.
    I'm wondering if it's the item being saved in session really which is taking all this time or something else could be causing it to run slow. I mean, can the debug results be misleading me?
    I'm using Apex 4.1 and Oracle 11g. I have 40 Shared_servers set.
    I would appreciate any hints.

    Hi,
    set partialSubmit=true on the button
    Frank

  • Dreamweaver CS6 and CC both very slow page rendering under Mavericks

    Dreamweaver CS6 and CC both very slow page rendering under Mavericks compared to 10.8.5
    Any ideas?

    One other thing I am seeing:
    When I open any document (html, javascript) inside DWCC now, then close it without any changes, DW asks if I want to save changes.
    I just tested this under 10.8.5 and there is no lag there, nor are documents mysteriously modified when opened.
    Note: I have tested this both with and without other Apps or extensions running in Mavericks and 10.8.5

  • Adobe Premier pro running very slow when rendering a file

    Adobe Premier pro running very slow when rendering a file

    Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
    ☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
    ☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
    ☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
    The title of the Console window should be All Messages. If it isn't, select
              SYSTEM LOG QUERIES ▹ All Messages
    from the log list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
              View ▹ Show Log List
    from the menu bar at the top of the screen. Click the Clear Display icon in the toolbar. Then take one of the actions that you're having trouble with. Select any messages that appear in the Console window. Copy them to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message by pressing command-V.
    The log contains a vast amount of information, almost all of which is irrelevant to solving any particular problem. When posting a log extract, be selective. A few dozen lines are almost always more than enough.
    Please don't indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
    Please don't post screenshots of log messages—post the text.
    Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.

  • Very Slow preview rendering for lightroom 5 on import

    I am seeing very very slow rendering of preview images only when using the import function in lightroom 5. By slow, I mean for a shoot of 60 shots in raw, it could take 30 minutes before I can preview them all in the pane to see which ones I want to actually import. This was not an issue with lightroom 4. It is not an issue when using lightroom. Previews are fast there, even for images I've never pulled up before.
    My hardware is a PC, with an intell i7 chip, and 16 gig of memory. My nvidia graphics card has the latest drivers.
    I've seen a few others reporting this issue, so I'm trying to log it as a bug. Even though the dial up support text on the adobe lightroom says available 24/7, it now plays a voice recording that says only available m-f.
    Brad

    I'm having the same problem using Windows 7 (64b). I just took a shoot over the weekend for a significant birthday event. Now I can't load the photos. The work-around doesn't work as the program freezes before I get the chance to select the camera under "files".
    I recently upgraded from 3.6 to 5 as I was also noticing a slowdown in the import function. That turned out to be a bad move I think. I also deliberately cleaned up the CF card and removed all my video recordings, as this seems to be reported as part of the problem, but to no avail.
    This seems to be a pretty major bug to have in a major release that's been around for a while now, that I'm expected to pay for, and no sign of a resolution to date!
    Cam. 

  • New 2012 iMac slower SD renders from AE than a 2007 MacPro?

    Hi there -
    I just purchased a new iMac for our small production house.  99% of the time, we are loving the machine: the performance, the stability, the speed, are all significant improvements over our 5 year-old Mac Pros.  We have run numerous tests comparing the performance of our new iMac to our old MacPros and on average, the new iMac is performing 2-4 times faster than our Mac Pros.  However, we've run into one specific issue where our iMac performs worse than our older MacPros, and unfortunately, this one issue is a major part of our everyday work flow and currently prevents us from converting all of our old Mac Pros to new iMacs.  I'll try to be as brief yet detailed as possible so you have all the specs.
    Our problem is when we render out standard definition Quicktime Animation MOV's out of Adobe After Effects CS5.5, our new iMac performs 30-100% slower than our 5-year old Mac Pros. 
    Here are the machines we're comparing:
    Mac Pro (OS X 10.6.8)
    2 x 3 GHz Dual Core Intel Xeon, 10 GB RAM,
    NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT 256 MB VRAM
    vs.
    2012 27" iMac (OS X 10.8.2)
    3.4GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, 32 GB RAM
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2GB, 3 TB Fusion Drive with (128 GB SSD)
    Both machines are running Adobe After Effects CS5.5 and are using the exact same projects and assets.  Source files were stored on the desktop for each test, and outputs were sent to the desktop. We have also manipulated Multi-Core Processing settings and RAM-Allocation settings and while we saw slight differences in render times on the iMac, it was never close to competing with the MacPro.
    Here are some of the other test results we get that meet our expectations:
                      - Encodes out of Adobe Premiere Pro are about twice as fast on the new iMac
                      - HD renders out of Adobe After Effects (both H.264 and Quicktime Animation) are about twice as fast on the new iMac
    Other tests
                      - We have downloaded a trial version of AE CS6 and have gotten similar results (SD renders are slower on the new iMac than our older MacPros).
    Does anyone have an idea what is going on here?  Is there some way that the operating system, hardware, or Adobe software treat these files differently so that standard definition renders would be much slower than a 5-year old Mac Pro?  Considering our new iMac has far superior processors and memory, we are not surprised that our HD renders are much faster now on our new machine.  But we are just baffled on how it could be performing worse on SD exports.

    I am having the exact same problem. I purchased an Imac and it was deliverd last week. I installed CS6 Production premium and went to work in after effects on a project that rendered very slow on my 2011 macbook pro 2.2 quad core I7 with 8gb DDR3 ram and an intel HD 3000 512 MB.
    My new Imac has the exact same specs as yours and I figured it would fly through the render, but in Premiere and AE the results are the same, my macbook pro is equaling and even surpassing the speed of the render time.
    I am very frusterated that the preformance is like this. If someone has answers please pass them on.

  • Performance point dashboard slow in rendering

    Hi,
    we have some performancepoint dashboard deployed on SharePoint 2010. These dashboard access an olap cube and display some data from cube.
    Sometimes rendering of dashboard is slow. Analyzing pages using developer dashboard we found that when rendering is slow we have a lot time spent in wcf calls to performancepoint services.
    For instance we spent 30 seconds in one wcf method call to GetFilterDisplayData method.
    If we run profiler in sql we don't see any query on analysis during these slow calls, so we assume there are some problems in wcf calls to PerformancePoint Service.
    Also we looked to this article for applying some caching settings:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/performancepoint/archive/2010/04/16/a-general-caching-overview-for-performance-point-services-for-sharepoint-2010.aspx
    Pages' filters don't contain too much data except for time filter that is a multi select tree filter that contains all days from January 2010 until today.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks!

    lookalike MSFT know about this potential performance, i think you need WCF throttling.
    WCF throttling settings
    PerformancePoint Services is implemented as a WCF service. WCF limits the maximum number of concurrent calls as a service throttling behavior. Although long-running queries could hit this bottleneck, this is an
    uncommon bottleneck. Monitor the WCF / Service Model performance counter calls outstanding for PerformancePoint Services and compare to the current maximum number of concurrent calls.
    If needed, change the Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) throttling behavior. See the WCF
    service throttling behaviors (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/p/?LinkId=200612) and Wenlong Dong’s blog post on WCF Request Throttling
    and Server Scalability (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/p/?LinkId=200613).
    Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog

  • KDE : slow font rendering

    Hi everyone !
    I'm completely new to Arch (coming from Ubuntu) and was really amazed at how fast my system could get and how easy it was to set it up.
    I only have one problem left (apart from the missing japanese fonts) :
    When anti-aliasing is turned on (in KDE), fonts rendering gets really slow. It can be noticed when selecting a big chunk of text with the mouse, in Konqueror or Kate : you can feel it takes some time. Or when switching tabs in Konqueror. Those are definitely much faster in Opera and Firefox.
    However, with anti-aliasing turned off, it is almost instant, as it should. But it looks really awful (in general, I have much trouble getting a good font rendering in linux. Probably because of my 19" LCD that only reached 1280x1024)
    Do you have any idea ? My config is : nvidia geforce 6600, proprietary drivers, athlon 64 3200+. I tried some MS fonts and the DejaVu font.
    Just in case, you may see my xorg.conf, below.
    THANKS EVER SO MUCH for reading this far I think my problem may concern many other newbies like me
    # nvidia-settings: X configuration file generated by nvidia-settings
    # nvidia-settings: version 1.0 (buildmeister@builder3) Thu Nov 9 17:56:12 PST 2006
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "Layout0"
    Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
    Screen 1 "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0"
    InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    RgbPath "/usr/lib/X11/rgb"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
    Load "dbe"
    Load "extmod"
    Load "type1"
    Load "freetype"
    Load "glx"
    EndSection
    Section "ServerFlags"
    Option "Xinerama" "0"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    # generated from default
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
    Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    # generated from default
    Identifier "Keyboard0"
    Driver "kbd"
    Option "XkbLayout" "fr"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    # HorizSync source: edid, VertRefresh source: edid
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "Unknown"
    ModelName "LG L1915S"
    HorizSync 30.0 - 83.0
    VertRefresh 56.0 - 75.0
    Option "DPMS"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    # HorizSync source: xconfig, VertRefresh source: xconfig
    Identifier "Monitor1"
    VendorName "Unknown"
    ModelName "TV-0"
    HorizSync 28.0 - 33.0
    VertRefresh 43.0 - 72.0
    Option "DPMS"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Videocard0"
    Driver "nvidia"
    VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
    BoardName "GeForce 6600"
    BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
    Screen 0
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Videocard1"
    Driver "nvidia"
    VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
    BoardName "GeForce 6600"
    BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
    Screen 1
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen0"
    Device "Videocard0"
    Monitor "Monitor0"
    DefaultDepth 24
    Option "metamodes" "CRT: nvidia-auto-select +0+0"
    SubSection "Display"
    Depth 24
    Modes "1600x1200" "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen1"
    Device "Videocard1"
    Monitor "Monitor1"
    DefaultDepth 24
    Option "metamodes" "TV: 800x600 +0+0"
    SubSection "Display"
    Depth 24
    Modes "1600x1200" "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
    EndSubSection
    EndSection

    Oh gees, it seems the culprit was the "sub-hinting" (halo de sous-pixellisation) option. I thought I had tried all possible combinations
    However, I wonder if it is supposed to slow down the display that much...
    Anyway... I would still be eager to find a solution to display japanese fonts
    Thanks for listening to me
    Last edited by mahen (2007-02-05 11:55:09)

  • Premier Pro CC 2014 Extremely slow in Rendering-No Hardware Utilization

    Hi,
    My name is Avinash and I am working as in-house Media production Specialist in BMC Software.
    Earlier we had MacBook Pro for all post production with adobe CC. we faced so many rendering issues during last year using mac, so we decided to switchover to high End Workstation.
    We procured Dell Precision Tower 7910 with Dual Intel Xeon Processors, 64GB Ram, Dual AMD Firepro W5100 GPU. Still I faced slow rendering, so called Dell Engineer to verify the hardware.
    It was all ok.
    So here I am trying understand where is the bug ?
    I have timeline around 51mins, sony nxcam shoot. added logo and text, monitored a render time which is around 5Hours. my cpu usage 4%, 6GB Ram and GOD knows if its using GPU
    but its very frustrating.
    Kindly Help me sorting out the issue.
    Thank You

    What are you calling ..."Render"?
    One renders a Sequence for preview and smooth playback of added FX etc for editing purposes (only)
    One Exports a Sequence for a Display objective. Transcode
    As a Media Production Specialist..you will be aware of the difference and the devil is in the detail.
    GPU is used in Rendering of FX etc but not in Export.  CPU and Ram to a point is the power house.  Have heard anecdotaly...that anything over 16GB Ram is wasted  though in PPro
    Must say ..seems low usage of CPU though and 5 hours is long for 51 mins.
    Generally I find my system Exports  approximately at real time (sequence time or slightly better,

  • AE is fast while working, slow when Rendering...?

    Hi there,
    I have a strange Problem with AE CS5.5 I guess.
    While working, everything is blazing fast. RAM-Previews are very quick, anything is fine. But when I'm rendering, it gets brutally slow.
    For example, I just had a small Animation with some Blur, Glow and Exposure, nothing big; in AE, I needed about 30secs for a RAM-Preview (at "Full"), but when rendering, it needs 10-15 Minutes. That's really strange, isn't it?
    I have a Dual Xeon-System with 16cores and 24GB RAM; I'm using 12 cores for rendering, 0,75GB/each. Windows 7 x64 is my OS
    Does anyone know how to maybe tweak it right?

    ->Output-Module
    1080p to FotoJPEG (QT) or CineForm, doesn't matter :/
    ->Drive Speed
    I thought about that. But honestly, how is this possible? The full video is about 100mb, not a big thing.
    Also, I tested it with my SSD, no Difference there.
    ->Network BUS Speed
    How is this related?
    These are my Multi-Processoring settings:
    I only queue one Item at a time.
    What else you need to know about my setup?

  • Z820 slow video rendering

    Hi,
    I work in a video production studio that is primarily Mac-oriented. We have two z820 workstations we want to incorporate into our workflows, and have upgraded them with 32gb RAM, Zturbo SSDs and Nvidia Quadro 5000 GPUs. We are hoping to get these stations to render as quickly or more quickly than the standard 2014 iMacs we have in the studio, but so far the machines are rendering a 4.5 minute 5K video sequence in about 12 minutes, as opposed to the Mac's 3 minutes.
    I was wondering if anyone on this forum had famliarity with video editing (we use Adobe Premiere Pro) and GPU maximization. We're trying to get the z820s to at least match their Mac counterparts.
    Currently the windows machines beat the Macs in transcoding and ingesting footage, going about 5x faster while transcoding Quicktime or R3D files into 1920 x 1080 HD quicktime, so I'm pretty sure they have the processing power to get the renders we want, i'm just not sure what video card/computer settings I might need to mess with to get there.
    Any and all help is much appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Zach

    @ZFinch 
    Hi,
    I have had some more time to think about your rendering issue.  Please post your hardware configuration and Product Number.
    How large are the data objects?
    Think of your rendering process like a single transaction much like when you do an online query to a server. If just one of your transactions are slow then you may have a data object problem. Just for now temporarily assume that the hardware platform is stable but you can test that assumption by running some diagnostics if you so desire.
    If all of the transactions are slow then think of the time line for the transaction. Typically the time line looking at the transaction linearly, is made up of three major queuing components: CPU, memory and I/O. You can start the Windows resource monitor before doing the rendering process and then look at the recorded results to determine where the bottlenecks reside.  Are all of the expected number of processors and threads running at 100%? Is the memory utilization at maximum for the 32 GB?  Are you seeking a lot of hard faults? Look at the disk queue length and I/O activity.  What do you see? Historically with transactions, I/O is the biggest bottleneck. 
    What are your biggest performance bottlenecks with your rendering process?  Once you give me some more information then I can make some more suggestions.  The above graphics that I had referenced may not solve your issue.
    HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
    HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
    HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
    Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
    Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
    Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

  • Slow text rendering in KDE.

    Hi there,
    I recently starting getting quite fed up with how I felt that writing stuff in kate (or kile, or kdevelop etc) was very slow and unresponsive. The effect I was getting is that there was a big delay (of up to a second or two sometimes) between hitting the key and the character appearing on the screen. It's especially noticeable if you type a whole bunch of stuff very quickly - wait for the screen to catch up!
    I did a few experiments, and managed to rule out any kate plugins etc, though I wasn't experiencing the same thing in konsole / yakuake. Also, I noticed that if I made the kate window smaller, so not so much of the text I was editing was visible, it would speed up. In fact, the size of the lag seems proportional to the amount of text visible and being rendered while typing (even if that text is not being changed).
    I fiddled with a few settings and noticed that I could fix the lag (i.e. completely get rid of it) by disabling "sub-pixel rendering" in KDE's font settings (and restarting the relevant program). Incidentally, it's not enough to have the the "sub-pixel rendering" box enabled and select "none" - that still creates the lag.
    Therefore, I can work around this for now by unchecking the box, but it got me interested in this. I'm thinking that it's something to do with the way Qt is rendering the fonts, possibly to do with my intel graphics driver, but possibly not.
    So this post is twofold really; firstly to let others know of the workaround in case they're also experiencing this, but also to ask around to see if other people are noticing this, with a view to filing a bug / feeding back to developers / deciding that I need newer hardware.
    My specs:
    - KDE from kdemod 4.2.2
    - intel 945GM graphics card onboard
    - xorg intel driver  (currently version 2.3.2, but I've experienced the same with earlier and later versions, up to the current git version)
    - XServer 1.6, though again, I've experienced this with 1.5 too.
    - Using EXA for rendering, though again I've had the same experience with XAA. Haven't tried UXA yet.
    So... anyone any contribution?
    Cheers,
    Pete.

    I experience sever slowdown in scrolling in Kate with my Intel 965.  However, I do not experience any problems in other applications (Kontact, Konsole, etc.).  I did not experience the problem (at least noticably) when I was using Xorg 1.4 and XAA.  Hopefully, 4.5.1 resolves this issue for me as well...  It's harder to deal with large code files now.

  • Slow Video Rendering w/ iMac i7

    My new iMac w/ i7 processor is rendering video slower than old iMac w/ Dual-Core.
    Any ideas? (FCE 4, rendering to external USB drive or internal HD)

    What material are you working with? What is your source video, your sequence settings, etc. Are you running any other apps? How full is your system HD?
    How do you know it's slower? What is the evidence? (real questions, not being funny)
    Also, you shouldn't be using a USB drive with Final Cut; that could be part of the problem.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I copy my itunes library to a new PC?

    my hard drive crashed, but I have been able to get it back as a slave drive in an older PC. I can see all of my files but I can't start any programs (iTunes) from this slave drive. Can I copy iTunes music files and library to a removable drive and re

  • CASE Statement error in function -- Please help!

    Hi All, I created a function in my report. It has a SQL query similar to the one below. The query works fine in SQL plus. It has a CASE statement. I am getting error at line4 at the select statement. Error is: "Encountered symbol 'SELECT'....." Can w

  • Variable for Document Date in Customer Receivable Aging

    Hi all, This is regarding u201CCustomer Receivable Aging u2013 Detailsu201D in SBOne. In the print layout, I found 3 types of date in system variables i.e. 1) system variable 184 = Due Date 2) system variable 185 = Posting Date 3) system variable 187

  • Using Oracle Dataguard 10g With Oracle EBS

    Hello, I am working on Linux with Oracle Database 10g and Oracle EBS R12 and trying to configure Oracle Data Guard with Oracle EBS. I have been reading Oracle My Support Document (Business Continuity for Oracle E-Business Release 12 Using Oracle 11g

  • Stock Transport Order with Delivery via Shipping

    Hai I created stock transport order Intra process. within company two plants .. i configured supplying plant i assigned sal.org,dis.channel,division and receiving plant i assigned customer number also. in po its automatically picked the shipping data