Slow data retrieval on 8i

I am using oracle 8i database on Windows 2000 server on compaq
proliant 350 server machine. The problem is that sometimes
connecting from a client is very slow and after connection data
retrieval is also slow. I am usring TCP/IP and net8. I came to
know from internet that there is a patch which is actually a
work around to solve this problem. Can anybody help me to locate
this patch?
Thanks in advance.
G. Rajan.

You can probably prove that this is the issue by creating a retrieve using the excel addin or smart view to replicate the form and see how long it takes to retrieve.
You will also see in the essbase app logs how long it is taking to perform the retrieve.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blgspot.com/

Similar Messages

Logical reporting cube - slow data retrieval

OLAP 11.2
I have seen discussion on this board recommending using a logical reporting cube to expose data if there are multiple physical cubes in the workspace. The problem I am having is that the data retrieval seems very slow from the logical cube while it is fine if I select from the actual physical cubes. Here is my set up.
Physical cube A - Dimensions x,y,z
Physical Cube B - Dimension w,x
Physical Cube C, Dimension y,z
Logical Cube D. Dimension w,x,y,z with calculated measures mapped to the measures from the cubes A,B and C as well as some other calculated measures based on these.
Data retrieval from A, B and C is quick but the query hangs if I select certain measures from D. On some measures, it seems to work without issues.
Is there some thing I am missing?
Thanks,
Usman

Usman,
Its probably because of LOOP_VAR and/or LOOP_DENSE settings of the measures in your Logical reporting cube.
I have posted on this topic in the past.   With this new Oracle-Forum interface its difficult to search old postings.
(1). Execute the following:
exec dbms_cube_log.enable(dbms_cube_log.TYPE_OPERATIONS, dbms_cube_log.TARGET_TABLE, dbms_cube_log.LEVEL_HIGH);
(2). Run the olap query.
(3). Query CUBE_OPERATIONS_LOG table
select *
from cube_operations_log
where   upper(suboperation) like '%LOOP%' or upper(name) like '%LOOP%'
order by time;
Tell us what you see in the 'NAME and 'VALUE' columns, after your query execution.
Also take a look at this post:   Delay when querying from CUBE_TABLE object, what is it?
Nasar

Slow data retrieval from essbase using Planning web

Hi
Well, When we try to access the data form on ultimate parent level, it takes long time to retrieve data from the server. Pls advice
Regards
SNK

You can probably prove that this is the issue by creating a retrieve using the excel addin or smart view to replicate the form and see how long it takes to retrieve.
You will also see in the essbase app logs how long it is taking to perform the retrieve.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blgspot.com/

BPC 10 - EPM data retrieval very slow!

Hi BPCers,
We are using an Excel EPM Input Schedules as a Resource Management tool - using VBA to provide the functionality we need.
Performance is generally good, but quickly deteriorates when handling larger data sets - even 500-600 rows of transactional data is enough to slow data retrieval from our BPC Cube to EPM to an unusable speed. This is in relative terms pretty small so there should be some option for optimisation.
Does anybody have any experience with this? All suggestions welcome. We are operating on EPM Service Pack 7 Patch 1, but I'm not sure that EPM is necessarily the problem here.
Thanks,
Tom

Thanks Gersh,
Had a look through fiddler and have identified the job that is causing the delay - some rooting around in the ABAP debugger produced the answer as to why adding more data slows processing speed so dramatically.
When we take data from the back end, we select a couple of parameters which limit the range of data that we are pulling through - a certain set of people, and a certain range of days. Once this is pulled through, allocations are made to any combination of person and day within this range, which generates and extra two properties - a project ID and a work status.
This makes 4 properties, and when BPC pulls data it attempts to find every combination of every one of the properties that exist within this range - so the more allocations made the more this slows down as it dramatically increases the number of combinations.
The result is that BPC runs through a couple of hundred thousand generated tables, most of which are nonsense.
Not sure what to do from here. This is how BPC reads data so approaching a fix could be difficult.
Tom

Data Retrieval from SSRS 2008 R2 to SQL Server 2012 standard

Hello,
We have a virtual machine running SSRS 2008 R2 and a physical server running SQL server 2012 standard. We are having an issue with a report that is taking almost 10 minutes for the data to be retrieved from the sql 2012 database. We used the
execution logging query to debug and analyze. We see that it renders and processes very fast, but the data retrieval time is very slow. When the same query is run using sql studio mgr. from the SSRS server it runs just fine...it
takes seconds for the results to come up.
I don't believe there is a compatibilty issue because other reports run fine. We're just having problems with one report.

A long shot, but I've seen where the data type of a report parameter is mismatched against the data type of the table it is being compared against. SQL profiler would show this clearly.
This would explain why the query returns quickly in ssms but not with the report.

Need data retrieval recommendations for the UK only please

Hey folks.
I just wanted to say that I had a problem with strange sounds off my hard disk, the lengthy restarts and problems waking up the computer after battery being empty and finally my hard disk died completely.
With 17 months under its belt this Hitachi 80GB hard disk ought not to have died but this happens. Sadly I was ABOUT to back up (isn't that always the way?) but had not managed (due to the problems) and so lost some EXTREMELY valuable data. ie photos (numbering 400 and about 600 others) of my grandfather who was taken into hospital for heart failure aged 91 on the VERY SAME DAY.
Now- I am NOT letting this hard disk go. I have been told by the kind but very slow (Apple took over a fortnight to send them a replacement disk and they had it for 16 days in the end- I went mad) folk who repaired it, it is the mechanism which failed and not the platters which melted or otherwise warped.
So- this means that the chances of data retrieval are high. BUT- I have had one quote from the firm they recommended and was told it could be as much as £1,300 on the slowest service. Now, as you will appreciate, there IS no value which can be placed on such precious things as memories of a loved one but SURELY there is a chance that someone here has knowledge of a more- erm- cost efficient method?
LOOOOONG story short: Can you recommend anyone in the UK area who does a good job retrieving data from what has been deemed a high probability recovery?
Anything I need to know about the subject? All I can tell you is that this WILL involve removing the platters from the mechanism and placing them to another, functioning one with the probability of needing to back up in the region of 20GB.
Your help in this is so very gratefully received. I am thankful you users are here to hold my hand on this.

Posted this under the correct header as well- 15 Powerbook. Resolved it myself- went on the net and just picked one. Was semi-successful and if you are needing info check it out- I have explained this there.

Query Error Information: Result set is too large; data retrieval ......

Hi Experts,
I got one problem with my query information. when Im executing my report and drill my info in my navigation panel, Instead of a table with values the message "Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration" appears. I already applied "Note 1127156 - Safety belt: Result set is too large". I imported Support Package 13 for SAP NetWeaver 7. 0 BI Java (BIIBC13_0.SCA / BIBASES13_0.SCA / BIWEBAPP13_0.SCA) and executed the program SAP_RSADMIN_MAINTAIN (in transaction SE38), with the object and the value like Note 1127156 says... but the problem still appears....
what Should I be missing ?????? How can I fix this issue ????
Thank you very much for helping me out..... (Any help would be rewarded)
David Corté

You may ask your basis guy to increase ESM buffer (rsdb/esm/buffersize_kb). Did you check the systems memory?
Did you try to check the error dump using ST22 - Runtime error analysis?
Edited by: ashok saha on Feb 27, 2008 10:27 PM

WAD : Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration

Hi All,
When trying to execute the web template by giving less restiction we are getting the below error :
Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration
Result set too large (758992 cells); data retrieval restricted by configuration (maximum = 500000 cells)
But when we try to increase the number of restictions it is giving output. For example if we give fiscal period, company code ann Brand we are able to get output. But if we give fical period alone it it throwing the above error.
Note : We are in SP18.
Whether do we need to change some setting in configuration? If we yes where do we need to change or what else we need to do to remove this error
Regards
Karthik

Hi Karthik,
the standard setting for web templates is to display a maximum amount of 50.000 cells. The less you restrict your query the more data will be displayed in the report. If you want to display more than 50.000 cells the template will not be executed correctly.
In general it is advisable to restrict the query as much as possible. The more data you display the worse your performance will be. If you have to display more data and you execute the query from query designer or if you use the standard template you can individually set the maximum amount of cells. This is described over [here|Re: Bex Web 7.0 cells overflow].
However I do not know if (and how) you can set the maximum amount of cells differently as a default setting for your template. This should be possible somehow I think, if you find a solution for this please let us know.
Brgds,
Marcel

Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration

Hi,
While executing query for a given period, 'Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration' message is getting displayed. I had searched in SDN and I had referred the following link:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/d047e1a1-ad5d-2c10-5cb1-f4ff99fc63c4&overridelayout=true
Steps followed:
1) Transaction Code SE38
2) In the program field, entered the report name SAP_RSADMIN_MAINTAIN and Executed.
3) For OBJECT, entered the following parameters: BICS_DA_RESULT_SET_LIMIT_MAX
4) For VALUE, entered the value for the size of the result set, and then executed the program:
After the said steps, the below message is displayed:
OLD SETTING:
OBJECT = VALUE =
UPDATE failed because there is no record
OBJECT = BICS_DA_RESULT_SET_LIMIT_MAX
Similar message is displayed for Object: BICS_DA_RESULT_SET_LIMIT_DEF.
Please let me know as to how to proceed on this.
Thanks in advance.

Thanks for the reply!
The objects are not available in the RSADMIN table.

Real tough data retrieval - assistance needed

Late 2011 Macbook Pro with 500GB hard drive
Lion 10.7
One morning out of absolutely nowhere I get this grey screen with a flashing question mark folder. I take it to the geniuses at the Apple store and they tell me my hard drive has failed (no explanation). My mac is under warranty so they gave me a new hard drive for free, bagged my old hard drive and told me "good luck" retrieving the data.
I'm on a mission to retrieve the data without paying for services. I have never retrieved data before but I've been doing a lot of forum reading and I have been getting protips from an IT friend who has saved my PC data before.
As of now, I have been unable to even access the hard drive and so I am reaching out to the community to help me conquer this project.
the problem is not the OS (according to Apple store)
when hooking up with the dongle, neither Finder nor Disk Utility detect the bad drive
the drive will spin when forced by the dongle (so I've ruled out the freezer method)
I was advised (by friends and forums alike) to download so powerful data retrieval software:
Data Rescue [did not detect bad external drive]
Disk Drill [did not detect bad external drive]
TestDisk (http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk) [I can get it up and running but I have no idea how to use this software]
So that seems to be the big problem, when I hook up my failed drive as an external hard drive, there is no acknowledgement from my MBP that it is connected and as such data recovery programs cannot access it. When I still had it installed in my computer, there was no clicking sound and it doesn't seem like any of the components are jammed up as it still spins.
Where do I go from here? Please keep in mind that I am new to resolving my own technical problems but I'm willing to learn. Tired of being one of those people who look at computer parts and get anxious.
NOTE: I haven't tried Target Mode as I do not have a firewire cable or access to another mac (yet). If you think I should try this, please let me know.

A hard drive that will not divulge BOTH its Make&Model and a reasonable size/capacity to the likes of Disk Utility and data rescue programs has died, and connot be repaired with any software.
Target Disk mode will not improve anything. The drive is read as a Mac Volume by software. If it won't mount under Mac OS X, it won't mount under Target Disk Mode.

Should I use a data retrieval service or software to recover data ?

Please pardon the length of this post.
Here's the setup for our office:
Computer 1:
10.4.8 OS X
1 GHZ PowerPC G4: silver grey tower, grey apple
1MB L3 Cache
256 MB DDR SDRAM
Computer 2:
10.4.8 OS X
Dual 450 MHZ PowerPC G4: blue grey tower, blue apple
256 MB SDRAM
Computer 3:
10.4.8 OS X
1 GHZ PowerPC G4 IMac Flat Screen:
256 MB DDR SDRAM
I have 2 LaCie Big Disk d2 Extremes daisy chained and connected to the IMac. We use the first to store all of our data to keep our local disks free. The second d2 is the backup to the first. The other 2 computers connect to the d2's via an ethernet hub. The d2's are each partitioned into 4 compartments.
A couple of days ago I started the system up when I got in in the morning, and the main d2 would not open. I ran disk utility, but it said that the drive was damaged beyond it's ability to repair. I ran DiskWarrior, and it gave me this message:
"The directory of disk 'G4' cannot be rebuilt. The disk was not modified. The original directory is too severely damaged. It appears another disk utility has erased critical directory information. (3004, 2176)."
I contacted Disk Warrior tech support and after a series of exchanges that had me send him dated extracted from the terminal function, he said this:
"It appears that the concatenated RAID inside your LaCie
drive has failed (your 500GB drive is actually 2 250GB
hard drives). That is why we only saw 2 partitions
on "disk3". A possible cause could be a failed bridge
in the case.
You may be looking at sending this drive to a data recovery service.
However, it is possible that we may be able to recover data
from the partitions that we CAN see. What we would be doing would cause no damage to your data
unless the hard drives were having a mechanical failure (ie, the
head crashed and was contacting the platters, similar to scratching
a record). But from what I've seen, I don't feel that is the case.
I believe the piece of hardware that 'bridges' the two drives to
make them act as one has failed. that's why we can only see data
about 1 of the 2 drives in the case.
We would only be attempting to gather data off the drive. Since
data recovery services sometimes charge for amount of data retrieved,
it's up to you how you want to proceed."
Most of the data from the past 5 years for our business stands at being lost. Only some of it had been properly backed up on the second drive, due to some back up software issues. I want to do whatever I can to retrieve all of, or at least some of the data. From what the Alsoft technician said, do you think that the data recovery software available to the consumer is going to be robust enough to retrieve at least the data from the one disk in the drive that is recognizable (there are 2 250gig disks in the d2X. Only one is responding at all). If so, do these Softwares further damage the disks? Or should I just send the drive to a data recovery service?
I'd like to try to extract some of it myself via over the counter retrieval software, but I don't know whether to trust these programs?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Peter McConnell
1 GHZ PowerPC G4 IMac Flat Screen Mac OS X (10.4.8) Posted

Peter
My 2 cents:
I have used FileSalvage
http://www.subrosasoft.com/OSXSoftware/index.php?mainpage=product_info&productsid=1
to recover files from damaged disks. It works as advertised, within limits. Some files may be too damaged to recover. More importantly yo get to scan the disk before actually recovering, and it will give you a list of what it thinks it can recover.
My experience was that it recovered approx 85% of the data.
YMMV but they do have a trial.
Regards
TD

Report Developed in Webi Rich Client Consuming more time in Data Retrieval

Dear All,
I am a BO Consultant, recently in my project I have developed one report in Webi Rich Client., at the time of development and subsequent days the report was working fine (taking Data Retrieval time less than 1 minute), but after some days its taking much time (increasing day by day and now its taking more than 11 minutes).
Can anybody point out what could be the reason?????
We are using,
1. SAP BI 7.0
2. SAP BO XI 3.1 Edge
3. Webi Rich Client Version :12.3.0 and Build 601
This report is made on a Multiprovider (Sales).
What are the important points that should be considered so that we can improve the performance of Webi Reports????
Waiting for a suitable solution.....................
Regards,
Arun Krishnan.G
SAP BO Consultant
Edited by: ArunKG on Oct 11, 2011 3:50 PM

Hi,
Please come back here with a copy/paste of the 2 MDX statements from the MDA.log to compare the good/bad runtimes.
& the 2 equivalent DPCOMMANDS clauses (good and bad) from the WebI trace logs.
Can u explain what u really mean in the bold text above..................Actually I didn't get you..........
Pardon, I have only 3 months experience in BO.
Regards,
Arun
Edited by: ArunKG on Oct 11, 2011 4:28 PM

Apple tv slow data rate

HI Guys, i have a problem with one of my Apple TV. I currently have 2 Apple TV and one is having a slow data rate. I have Apple AirPort Time Capsule 2TB (latest gen) with most devices running on wireless connection and I checked the data rate (from the base station) on one Apple TV is showing 65Mbps and on another its showing between 6-13Mbps. The signal reception on both AppleTV is excellent. I have tried unplugging, restarting and restoring the AppleTV with no luck. The model number on this AppleTV is A1427. Any other ideas?

Hi arustandi,
Thanks for the question. If I understand correctly, one of the Apple TV's has a slow connection. I see you have already done a bit of troubleshooting. I would recommend that you read this article, it may be able to help with the slow connection.
Wi-Fi and Bluetooth: Potential sources of wireless interference - Apple Support
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
Have a great day,
Mario

Data retrieval for Sony handycam with 60G harddrive.

Does BestBuy do data retrieval? I have a handycam with work video on it that accidentaly got formated. I know with a standard harddrive you can still retrieve it if there has not been recording since the formatting but I am not sure about camera harddrives. If BestBuy does not do it, does anyone know where it can be done and approximate cost. I live in the New Orleans area.
I may try the same question in computers if nobody knows. Thanks in advance for any guidance at all.

Best Buy sends out for data retrieval. You can have it sent out through geek squad to get the estimate of cost.
Crystal
Superuser
Forum Guidelines | Terms & Conditions | Community Guidelines | What is a Superuser?
*Remember to mark your questions solved and click the star to give kudos to show your thanks!*
While I used to be a Best Buy Employee, I no longer have any affiliation with Best Buy.
My opinions do not in any way shape or form represent Best Buy's Official decisions.

Data Retrieval Speed in Oracle Spatial vs. ESRI ArcSDE

I would appreciate any opinions regarding data retrieval
performance between Oracle Spatial and ESRI ArcSDE. Would an end-
user (using ESRI software) experience significant differences in
data retrieval speed depending on how the data were stored in
Oracle (MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY verses ESRI Binary/Blob formats).
Knowing that the ESRI binary formats are tailored to their
software front-end apps (ArcGIS, ArcMap, ArcCatalog, and
ArcInfo), wouldn't this be a "non-issue" until the spatial
dataset gets "large", and even then, wouldn't performance be
(almost) equal if the spatial indexes were created properly?
Thanks for your inputs,
Bruce

John,
You can't do that type of query in sql from sql*plus using
SDEBINARY. HOwever, you can perform spatial queries in ArcMap
if you are using SDEBINARY.
You can use the query builder to perform point-in-polygon type
queries.
Hope that helps.
For my two cents, I think SDO_GEOMETRY gives you a more robust
database to work with, because you have the added power of
Oracle Spatial functions. If you are using SDEBINARY you are
limited to only what you can do thru ArcGIS.
If you are concerned more about performance than accessibility,
especially with a large number of users, then SDEBINARY might
be the better choice.
I love Oracle Spatial and am hoping that the performance issue
will not be a serious one when we start putting ArcIMS developed
apps into production.
Dave

Slow data retrieval on 8i

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for