SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1 Query Urgent !!

Hi Experts,
After i receive a mail using the FM 'SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1' in
my Outlook / Lotus Notes Inbox.
I have a requirement in which when i press Reply button the mail id should not
be the mail id from which the mail was received.
Is it feasible ?if yes how .
usefull replies will be suitable rewarded.
Thanks
Balwant

Hi Balwant,
Can you try using FM SO_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1 instead.
I checked the code of FM 'SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1' that you are using.
But this FM has a call to FM SO_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1 and while calling, the sender address is passed as SPACE. So by default it takes SY-UNAME.
In FM SO_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1 however, you will be able to pass sender.
PS: declare it as type soextreci1-receiver.

Similar Messages

Report in Answers using a SQL Query(Sub Query) URGENT

HI
Can anyone help me in creating a report in answers using this below query please. Its little Urgent. I have no idea how to implement this, please suggest.
Select
a.account_external_id, a.edc_external_id, c.ann_usg, indclassificationcode, g.usage_cv, trunc(g.bill_month, 'mm') bill_month
from
crm2ro.cdi_customer_gas_all a, pwrline.account@lodestar_source b, crm2ro.cdi_ann_usg c,
select * FROM
select * from
select distinct d.account_external_id, d.end_date, d.bill_month, USAGE_CV, dense_rank () over (partition by d.account_external_id order by d.end_Date desc) dr
from
crm2ro.cdi_usage_gas_all d, crm2ro.cdi_customer_gas_all e
where
d.account_external_id = e.account_external_id and upper(e.plan_id) like '%CPS%' and e.product_external_id = 'V' and e.crm_product = 'MV'
and (e.plan_id like '%VAR_CPS_MX_G%' or e.plan_id like '%VAR_CPS_IT_G%') and e.account_status = 'ACTIVE'
)where dr<=12
) h
) g
where
a.account_external_id = g.account_external_id and
a.account_external_id = c.account_external_id and
a.account_external_id = b.accountid
thanks
van

Yes Jai,
I want to do it from rpd or from the advance tab as 974053 said. But I am not aware of doing through advance tab and if I want to do through rpd then how can I do it. Please help me how to build this query through rpd or any other solution.

Enterprise bpm cluster query urgent please

Hello
I have 3 machines one 1st machine it is admin server and other 2 are managed servers
I will install weblogic on all 3 machines and then create a domain but my query is to do with BPM enterprise.Should I install bpm enterprise on all 3 machines as well or just on 1 machine(admin machine/1st machine) ? this is my doubt can you please clarify..
it is pretty urgent
thanks

With one machine is enough, then you will deploy to the WLS cluster at the end of the day you do not need to have BPM installed except for the Process Administrator.
HTH

In line SQL Query - Urgent

In the problem iam calculating a Stock report.In the SQL suppose the relation F does not return any rows , then (D.ACC_QTY + F.RET_QTY) gives null. How to avoid this problem..
SELECT A.CLASSIFICATION_CODE, A.ITEM_ABBR, A.ITEM_DESC,
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE, A.UOM_DESC, A.BASIC_PRICE,
(A.OPENING_QTY + B.ACC_QTY - C.ISS_QTY)
OPENING_STOCK, (D.ACC_QTY + F.RET_QTY) ACCEPT_QTY, E.ISS_QTY,
((A.OPENING_QTY + B.ACC_QTY - C.ISS_QTY)
+ (D.ACC_QTY + F.RET_QTY) - E.ISS_QTY)
QTY_IN_HAND
FROM (SELECT CLASSIFICATION_CODE, ITEM_ABBR, ITEM_DESC,
ALT_ITEM_CODE, NVL(OPENING_QTY, 0)
OPENING_QTY, UOM_MASTER.UOM_DESC,
BASIC_PRICE
FROM ITEM_MASTER, UOM_MASTER
WHERE ITEM_MASTER.UOM_CODE = UOM_MASTER.UOM_CODE)
A,
(SELECT GRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(GRN_DETAIL.ACCEPT_QTY, 0))
ACC_QTY
FROM GRN_HEADER, GRN_DETAIL
WHERE GRN_HEADER.GRN_NO = GRN_DETAIL.GRN_NO AND
GRN_HEADER.GRN_DATE < '01-JAN-2006'
GROUP BY GRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE) B,
(SELECT MRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(MRN_DETAIL.ISSUED_QTY, 0))
ISS_QTY
FROM MRN_HEADER, MRN_DETAIL
WHERE MRN_HEADER.MRN_NO = MRN_DETAIL.MRN_NO AND
MRN_HEADER.MRN_DATE < '01-JAN-2006'
GROUP BY MRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE) C,
(SELECT GRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(GRN_DETAIL.ACCEPT_QTY, 0))
ACC_QTY
FROM GRN_HEADER, GRN_DETAIL
WHERE GRN_HEADER.GRN_NO = GRN_DETAIL.GRN_NO AND
GRN_HEADER.GRN_DATE BETWEEN
'01-JAN-2006' AND '31-DEC-2006'
GROUP BY GRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE) D,
(SELECT MRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(MRN_DETAIL.ISSUED_QTY, 0))
ISS_QTY
FROM MRN_HEADER, MRN_DETAIL
WHERE MRN_HEADER.MRN_NO = MRN_DETAIL.MRN_NO AND
MRN_HEADER.MRN_DATE BETWEEN
'01-JAN-2006' AND '31-DEC-2006'
GROUP BY MRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE) E,
     (SELECT B.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(B.QUANTITY_ISSUE,0))
RET_QTY
FROM MATERIAL_MOVEMENT_HEADER A,MATERIAL_MOVEMENT_DETAIL B
WHERE A.SLIP_NO = B.SLIP_NO AND
A.SLIP_DATE BETWEEN
'01-JAN-2006' AND '31-DEC-2006' AND
          B.TO_JOB_CODE IS NULL
GROUP BY B.ITEM_CODE) F
WHERE A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = B.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = C.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = D.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = E.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
     A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = F.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
     A.ALT_ITEM_CODE LIKE 'BOBRNG%017' AND
A.CLASSIFICATION_CODE = 'BO';

Sorry members for writing the word 'Urgent'..and really cutting down on your work.
I am thankful to the person who pointed out my error in the query..it was really simple..should hv solved myself, but even after changing the query with Nvl and changing the business logic to some extent it again fetches no rows..
The sql given underneath is basically a job-wise stock allocation report..
SELECT B.JOB_CODE, A.CLASSIFICATION_CODE, A.ITEM_ABBR,
A.ITEM_DESC, A.ALT_ITEM_CODE, A.UOM_DESC,
A.BASIC_PRICE, (A.OPENING_QTY + (NVL(B.ACC_QTY, 0)
+ NVL(F.RET_IN, 0)) - (NVL(C.ISS_QTY, 0) + NVL(G.RET_OUT,
0))) AS OPENING_STOCK, (NVL(D.ACC_QTY, 0)
+ NVL(H.RET_IN, 0)) RECEIVED, (NVL(E.ISS_QTY, 0)
+ NVL(I.RET_OUT, 0)) ISSUED,
((A.OPENING_QTY + (NVL(B.ACC_QTY, 0) + NVL(F.RET_IN, 0))
- (NVL(C.ISS_QTY, 0) + NVL(G.RET_OUT, 0)))
+ (NVL(D.ACC_QTY, 0) + NVL(H.RET_IN, 0)) - (NVL(E.ISS_QTY,
0) + NVL(I.RET_OUT, 0))) QTY_IN_HAND
FROM (SELECT CLASSIFICATION_CODE, ITEM_ABBR, ITEM_DESC,
ALT_ITEM_CODE, UOM_MASTER.UOM_DESC,
BASIC_PRICE, 0 OPENING_QTY
FROM ITEM_MASTER, UOM_MASTER
WHERE ITEM_MASTER.UOM_CODE = UOM_MASTER.UOM_CODE)
A,
(SELECT GRN_HEADER.JOB_CODE,
GRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(GRN_DETAIL.ACCEPT_QTY, 0))
ACC_QTY
FROM GRN_HEADER, GRN_DETAIL
WHERE GRN_HEADER.GRN_NO = GRN_DETAIL.GRN_NO AND
GRN_HEADER.GRN_DATE < '01-JAN-2006'
GROUP BY GRN_HEADER.JOB_CODE,
GRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE) B,
(SELECT B.TO_JOB_CODE, B.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(B.QUANTITY_ISSUE, 0)) RET_IN
FROM MATERIAL_MOVEMENT_HEADER A,
MATERIAL_MOVEMENT_DETAIL B
WHERE A.SLIP_NO = B.SLIP_NO AND
A.SLIP_DATE < '01-JAN-2006'
GROUP BY B.TO_JOB_CODE, B.ITEM_CODE) F,
(SELECT MRN_HEADER.JOB_CODE,
MRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(MRN_DETAIL.ISSUED_QTY, 0))
ISS_QTY
FROM MRN_HEADER, MRN_DETAIL
WHERE MRN_HEADER.MRN_NO = MRN_DETAIL.MRN_NO AND
MRN_HEADER.MRN_DATE < '01-JAN-2006'
GROUP BY MRN_HEADER.JOB_CODE,
MRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE) C,
(SELECT B.JOB_CODE, B.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(B.QUANTITY_ISSUE, 0)) RET_OUT
FROM MATERIAL_MOVEMENT_HEADER A,
MATERIAL_MOVEMENT_DETAIL B
WHERE A.SLIP_NO = B.SLIP_NO AND
A.SLIP_DATE < '01-JAN-2006'
GROUP BY B.JOB_CODE, B.ITEM_CODE) G,
(SELECT GRN_HEADER.JOB_CODE,
GRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(GRN_DETAIL.ACCEPT_QTY, 0))
ACC_QTY
FROM GRN_HEADER, GRN_DETAIL
WHERE GRN_HEADER.GRN_NO = GRN_DETAIL.GRN_NO AND
GRN_HEADER.GRN_DATE BETWEEN
'01-JAN-2006' AND '31-DEC-2006'
GROUP BY GRN_HEADER.JOB_CODE,
GRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE) D,
(SELECT B.TO_JOB_CODE, B.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(B.QUANTITY_ISSUE, 0)) RET_IN
FROM MATERIAL_MOVEMENT_HEADER A,
MATERIAL_MOVEMENT_DETAIL B
WHERE A.SLIP_NO = B.SLIP_NO AND
A.SLIP_DATE BETWEEN '01-JAN-2006' AND
'31-DEC-2006'
GROUP BY B.TO_JOB_CODE, B.ITEM_CODE) H,
(SELECT MRN_HEADER.JOB_CODE,
MRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(MRN_DETAIL.ISSUED_QTY, 0))
ISS_QTY
FROM MRN_HEADER, MRN_DETAIL
WHERE MRN_HEADER.MRN_NO = MRN_DETAIL.MRN_NO AND
MRN_HEADER.MRN_DATE BETWEEN
'01-JAN-2006' AND '31-DEC-2006'
GROUP BY MRN_HEADER.JOB_CODE,
MRN_DETAIL.ITEM_CODE) E,
(SELECT B.JOB_CODE, B.ITEM_CODE,
SUM(NVL(B.QUANTITY_ISSUE, 0)) RET_OUT
FROM MATERIAL_MOVEMENT_HEADER A,
MATERIAL_MOVEMENT_DETAIL B
WHERE A.SLIP_NO = B.SLIP_NO AND
A.SLIP_DATE BETWEEN '01-JAN-2006' AND
'31-DEC-2006'
GROUP BY B.JOB_CODE, B.ITEM_CODE) I
WHERE A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = B.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = C.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = D.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = E.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = F.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = G.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = H.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = I.ITEM_CODE (+) AND
B.JOB_CODE = C.JOB_CODE AND
B.JOB_CODE = D.JOB_CODE AND
B.JOB_CODE = E.JOB_CODE AND
B.JOB_CODE = F.TO_JOB_CODE AND
B.JOB_CODE = G.JOB_CODE AND
B.JOB_CODE = H.TO_JOB_CODE AND
B.JOB_CODE = I.JOB_CODE AND
A.ALT_ITEM_CODE = 'BOSNVL0004-006-002';
regards,

Need help wrt query urgently

Hi ,
I have two tables "table1" and "table2".Structure of the both tables are below:
Table1:
CustomerId
CustFname
CustLname
Convertion_Date
Table2:
CustomerId
DFname
DLname
CustomerId is used for joins .
Now i need a query based on conversion_date.
If conversion_date <sysdate
then
select CustomerId ,CustFname,CustLname,Convertion_Date from Table1
else
select CustomerId,DFname,DLname from Table2
End .
I need this functionality in a single query using case statement.
Please help ..
Thanks,
Preethi MR

Preethi MR wrote:
Hi ,
I have two tables "table1" and "table2".Structure of the both tables are below:
Table1:
CustomerId
CustFname
CustLname
Convertion_Date
Table2:
CustomerId
DFname
DLname
CustomerId is used for joins .
Now i need a query based on conversion_date.
If conversion_date <sysdate
then
select CustomerId ,CustFname,CustLname,Convertion_Date from Table1
else
select CustomerId,DFname,DLname from Table2
End .
I need this functionality in a single query using case statement.
Please help ..
Thanks,
Preethi MRIs this urgent homework? Or urgent something else work?
What exactly makes it urgent?

Change Source of query - Urgent

hello everyone,
I have an urgent requirement to change the source of the query, till now our query is based on Info cube but now we want it to come from the Multiprovider, so please give me some suggestions what to do. Should i copy this query, if yes, how should i go about it.
i shall assign points for all helpful answers.
Thanks
Laura.

Thanks for your quick reply guys,
But the thing is that the source cube is already a part of the multiprovider, but the multiprovider is not fetching data from the source cube. But when i try using RSZC, it gives me error list of info objects that are nt present in Multiprovider. Why is this error, because the info cube is already part of the multiprovider. Does the field of info cube also need to be part of multiprovider? If i dont have them, then doest that mean that i have to re-design the whole query again?
I have assigned points.
thanks
Laura

Plant Maintenance - AUFK table - LTEXT attribute - long text query - URGENT

Hi,
I have a query regarding AUFK table which has the LTEXT attribute in it.
I want to know how this field gets set ?
Does sap automatically sets the field, is it a standard functionality ? and also what difference does it bring when it gets set and when it is blank ?
Please educate me on this, its very urgent.
Many Thanks,
Madan

Hi,
Thanks for your response.
But I need detail explanation about the AUFK-LTEXT field.
1. How does it get set ?
2. Do we have to set it manually or sap does that ?
Awaiting your response,
Madan
Edited by: Madan N on Jun 11, 2008 2:15 PM

Need SQL Query ---Urgent

Hi Gurus,
Select * from xxa_test1
invoice_type || LOC_CODE|| seq_no
=========================
DOMESTIC     A     1
DOMESTIC     B     2
DOMESTIC     C     3
Select * from xxa_test2
cust_no || cust_name || loc_code
=======================
1001 Test B
1001 Test C
The Requirement is i want sql query to retrive only one record based on seq no if suppose 2 records retrive in that
B is having seqno 2 and c having seq no 3
that sql query should return only one record which is having min seq no. for example in that B, C only B record should return.
If multiple values returned then the program must check based on the seq no it should take min seq no.
i have written this query
Select *
from xxa_test2 t2
where t2.loc_code in (select t1.loc_code
from xxa_test1 t1
order by Seq_no
where above query is correct or not , i am getting problem with this query.
Please let me know its very urgent
Thanks
Manju
Edited by: venu on Jul 26, 2011 12:50 AM

Something like:
SELECT cust_no, cust_name, loc_code
FROM
(with xxa_test1
as (SELECT 'DOMESTIC' invoice_type, 'A' loc_code, 1 seq_no FROM dual
union all
SELECT 'DOMESTIC', 'B', 2 FROM dual
union all
SELECT 'DOMESTIC', 'C', 3 FROM dual),
xxa_test2
as (SELECT 1001 cust_no, 'Test' cust_name, 'B' loc_code FROM dual
union all
SELECT 1001 , 'Test' , 'C' FROM dual)
SELECT cust_no, cust_name, t2.loc_code, seq_no, min(seq_no) over() min_seq
FROM xxa_test2 t2,xxa_test1 t1
WHERE t2.loc_code = t1.loc_code)
WHERE seq_no = min_seq
SQL> /
   CUST_NO CUST L
      1001 Test B

Need help in query urgent...............

hi......
i have the table with following structure.
Table name : master
id name v_value
1 ashok 1
2 balak 2
3 kathir 4
4 karan 8
Input:
6
Need output
id name v_value
2 bala 2
3 kathir 4
Query like
SELECT * FROM MASTER WHERE V_VALUE IN (<input value>) ;
if given input value 6 means, how to split the value into 4 and 2....
if given input value 12 means, how to split the value into 4,8....
like wise.... for all the combinations..... for the above table values.
if i give the input value 6 means, i need the query like
select * from master where v_value in (2,4).
is split the value is possible by user define function?
like
select * from master v_value in (userdefine_function(<input value>));
if possible means give the function code.
It is very urgent for my project....
Thanks,
S.Ashokkumar
India.

Ohh...you made it very simple. how can we accomplish
the bitwise OR/XOR/...so on.They are all variations on the bitand:
SQL> var P1 number
SQL> var P2 number
SQL> exec :P1 := 4;
PL/SQL-procedure is geslaagd.
SQL> exec :P2 := 6;
PL/SQL-procedure is geslaagd.
SQL> select :P1 + :P2 - bitand(:P1,:P2) bitor from dual
2 /
                                 BITOR
                                     6
SQL> select :P1 + :P2 - 2 * bitand(:P1,:P2) bitxor from dual
2 /
                                BITXOR
                                     2
SQL> exec :P1 := 3;
PL/SQL-procedure is geslaagd.
SQL> exec :P2 := 32;
PL/SQL-procedure is geslaagd.
SQL> select :P1 + :P2 - bitand(:P1,:P2) bitor from dual
2 /
                                 BITOR
                                    35
SQL> select :P1 + :P2 - 2 * bitand(:P1,:P2) bitxor from dual
2 /
                                BITXOR
                                    35Regards,
Rob.

Help me write a SQL query; urgent

Hi, can somebody please help me write a SQL query.
I have 3 tables each with the same column names (Col1, Col2, Col3). Col1 is PK with Unique Constraint.
I wanted to add values of Col2 and Col3 (from all 3 tables) and put it in a separate table (i.e aggregated) of all values found in Col1.
Does anybody help me please ?
thanks alot.

Please don't mark your question as urgent. You've been around here long enough that you should know that it will not get your question anwered any faster, and may just irritate people into not answering at all.
I'm not sure exactly what you want.
Are you saying you want t1.c2 + t1.c3 + t2.c2 + t2.c3+ t3.c2 + t3.c3 for the rows that have the same c1 in all three tables?
If so, it would be like this, I think: insert into t4
select t1.c1
, t1.c2 + t1.c3 + t2.c2 + t2.c3+ t3.c2 + t3.c3
from t1, t2, t3
where t2.c1 = t1.c1
and t3.c1 = t1.c1If that's not what you want, please clarify.
And next time maybe you should post your SQL question in a SQL forum.

Need a SQL Query (URGENT)

Hi Folks,
I have 2 tables, in which the 1st one has 200 columns and 2 table had 2 columns.. There is one common column for both the tables, but there is little change in schema of the tables...The common col in 2nd table is a primary key but the same column in the 1st table is a ordinary one..The data type for the common column is same...
Now i need to write a query to select 199columns(except the common column)from the 1st table and the other column(2nd col)other than the common column frm the 2nd table for "table1.commoncolumn=table2.commoncolumn"......
I had tried the natural join but its nt working in my informix sql database....I also tried by explicitly mentioning column names like "select column1,column2....column199,table2.column2 from table1,table2 where table1.commoncolumn=table2.commoncolumn", but its having a severe performance impact.......
Can some please suggest a query for the above one?? Thankx in advance..

Please gimme possible solutions & suggestions regarding the above query....
The informix z forum very slow...The problem is, you labeled your questions badly. As this is a forum of volunteers people tend to react badly to the use of the word "urgent" in the subject line. Nobody's question matters more than anybody else's. In fact some regulars won't answer questions with "urgent" in the strapline as a matter of principle.
Then when we get to actually read your question it turns out to be a question about Informix. I guess not many people here use Informix so your potential pool of responders is pretty small (for instance I'm not even sure how to spell it).
It's not our fault the Informix forums are so lame.
Anyway, what I suggest is you repost your question with a new title: (Off topic) Need help with an INFORMIX query.
At least that will attract people who might be able to answer your question. Then you need to include the actual query you're running and all the supporting details necessary for people to understand the nature of the performance impact.
You need to ask the right people and you need to ask the right question. This is standard etiquette (and indeed common sense) regardless of which forum you're using.
Cheers, APC
Blog : http://radiofreetooting.blogspot.com/

Change the source of query - Urgent

hello everyone,
I have an urgent requirement to change the source of the query, till now our query is based on Info cube but now we want it to come from the Multiprovider, so please give me some suggestions what to do. Should i copy this query, if yes, how should i go about it.
i shall assign points for all helpful answers.
Thanks
Laura.

Laura,
Queries can only be copied if the underlying objects are the same and copying is the only way.
Use transaction RSZC to copy. Technical name of the copied query is different to the technical name of the original query. If the underlying cubes are not completely identical then this won't work and then the only option is to manually move the query.
Secondly, this will only copy the query and not the related objects like views or web templates.
Cheers
Aneesh

Get data for current month in VC from query - Urgent

Hi all,
I have designed a query for cube FIAR_C03 for overdue items and query output contains customer, net due date, document date, fiscal year period and amount. I want a chart for that query in VC that only contains those items in which net due date is in current month. How can i do that?
Where I can place the condition to display only those items in vc in which net due date is in current month and how ?
Please respond.
Regards,
Aisha Ishrat
ICI Pakistan Ltd.

Hi Aisha,
It is possible to do with following steps:
1. In Query Design make your field 'Net Due' filter with variable for date input (0CALMONTH for example where your date should be this format MMYYYY). Test your query and see if you input a month/year date it would would work;
2. Build one table from output of your query (choose fields);
3. In Visual Composer, drag your query into your board and from 'Varaiables' port (NOT FROM INPUT) drag a line to create a Start point. As soon you realease to create 'Start' a box will ask which fields you want. Choose your date as field;
4. Select the line between Start point a query. In Input Field assigned the following formula (DSTR(NOW(),'MMYYYY') *
5. Deploy your model
at this formula I said: transform NOW(), current date, in Text with format MMYYYY (012002 for example).
It works!
Assigned points if was helpful.
Kind Regards,
Gilson Teixeira

ABAP QUERY - Urgent

Hello Friends,
I have used SQVI for ABAP query but look slike it is only for inner join.
Is there a way that I could do left outer join, or any other way.
Please suggest.
Ster

hi Ster,
in SQVI there is this graphical tool to link the tables. Just right click the thin line between the two fileds and choose 'left outer join'
hope this helps
ec

Error with 'At Selection-Screen' in Infoset query (Urgent)

Hi All,
I have defined a field as a selection criteria in Selections tab of Infoset & written a few lines of code. The syntax is ok, but when i try to run the query, the system prompts the message as below & terminates:
'Local SELECT-OPTIONS are not allowed (FORM routine or GET event is active).'
I would like to know what code should i enter in the GET / GET LATE section. Can someone help me?
Edited by: Vivek on Dec 31, 2007 10:27 AM

Mr. Atish,
Thanks for the reply, but wish to inform you, i have not written any code in GET / GET-LATE section of the infoset. I just read the SAP help files, where it mentions that i need to maintain some check code in GET / GET-LATE section if i have defined selection criteria in selections tab.
May i know what code should i maintain?
In selections tab i have defined 2 selection criterias, for one criteria i have maintained the code & for the other in Extras field i have maintained a Default value & entered 'NO-DISPLAY'.
Await your inputs to resolve this problem.
Vivek

SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1 Query Urgent !!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for