Solaris 11.2 Zones

Hi All,
I've been battling with creating/installing a zone.
I've setup all my zone configs but when I try to install the my zone. this is the error message I get:
'NoneType' object has no attribute 'bind'
And when I check the install log, this is what I see:
[Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:37:21 PM SAST] ==== Starting: /usr/lib/brand/solaris/pkgcreatezone -Z test2 -R /zoneroots/earth11 ====
[Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:37:21 PM SAST] Progress being logged to /var/log/zones/zoneadm.20141008T103721Z.test2.install
[Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:37:22 PM SAST]        Image: Preparing at /zoneroots/earth11/root.
[Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:37:23 PM SAST]   setting ZFS property zoned=on on earth11/rpool
[Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:37:23 PM SAST]   setting ZFS property canmount=on on earth11/rpool
[Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:37:23 PM SAST]   setting ZFS property mountpoint=/rpool on earth11/rpool
[Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:37:23 PM SAST] Running auto-install: '/usr/bin/auto-install -z test2 -Z earth11/rpool -m /tmp/manifest.xml.10aG8B -c /usr/share/auto_install/sc_profiles/enable_sci.xml'
[Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:37:23 PM SAST] ERROR: auto-install failed.
[Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:37:23 PM SAST] Exiting with exit code 255
[Wednesday, October 8, 2014 12:37:23 PM SAST] ==== Completed: /usr/lib/brand/solaris/pkgcreatezone -Z test2 -R /zoneroots/earth11 ====
Now, I noticed this install is running an 'auto-install' and it trying to use the profile xml.
This is new for me, I've been running Solaris 11.1 without any issues, I've tried looking for docs online on how to create a zone, because I thought there might be some new features and change on Solaris 11.2 and all I got is Installing using the AI Manifest and nothing else.
Has Oracle thrashed the old way the zones were created and are now forcing us to use AI Manifests only??
And also, is there a way of getting/downloading the old version Solaris 11.1 anywhere (Please give me a link), because this new version is getting on my nerves now.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Phumlani

Hi rmanus,
I doubt this is a network issue, but I may never know...
One thing I didn't mention though is that I'm using a local Repo, and one of the articles I came across with the same problem, mentioned that they had to update their repo with the latest SRUs at that time. That might be worth a shot?
Here is the output you requested:
# dladm
LINK                CLASS     MTU    STATE    OVER
net1                phys      1500   up       --
net3                phys      1500   unknown --
net0                phys      1500   up       --
net2                phys      1500   unknown --
aggr1               aggr      1500   up       net0 net1
aggr170             vlan      1500   up       aggr1
aggr169             vlan      1500   up       aggr1
# ipadm
NAME              CLASS/TYPE STATE        UNDER      ADDR
aggr169           ip         down         --         --
aggr170           ip         ok           --         --
aggr170/v4     static     ok           --         1**.**.***.**/24
lo0               loopback   ok           --         --
lo0/v4         static     ok           --         127.0.0.1/8
lo0/v6         static     ok           --         ::1/128
sppp0             ip         ok           --         --
# zonecfg -z earth11 info
zonename: earth11
zonepath: /earth11_pool/earth11
brand: solaris
autoboot: false
bootargs:
file-mac-profile:
pool: earth11_pool
limitpriv:
scheduling-class:
ip-type: exclusive
hostid:
fs-allowed:
anet:
        linkname: net0
        lower-link: auto
        allowed-address not specified
        configure-allowed-address: true
        defrouter not specified
        allowed-dhcp-cids not specified
        link-protection: mac-nospoof
        mac-address: random
        mac-prefix not specified
        mac-slot not specified
        vlan-id not specified
        priority not specified
        rxrings not specified
        txrings not specified
        mtu not specified
        maxbw not specified
        rxfanout not specified
        vsi-typeid not specified
        vsi-vers not specified
        vsi-mgrid not specified
        etsbw-lcl not specified
        cos not specified
        pkey not specified
        linkmode not specified

Similar Messages

Solaris 8 branded zone core dump on cssd

Hi,
Just migrated my first Sol8 machine to a solaris 8 branded zone. but on the console I get error messages:
Nov 8 12:45:42 gent320b cssd: The process "ccv.sh" has been killed by sig#139, core dumped
Nov 8 12:45:47 gent320b cssd: The process "kkcv.sh" has been killed by sig#139, core dumped
the netstat -f unix
Active UNIX domain sockets
Address Type Vnode Conn Local Addr Remote Addr
stream-ord 6000ebffad8 00000000 /tmp/jd_sockV6
output doesn't list any /dev/ccv or /dev/kkcv sockets like to 'real' machine.
Any ideas?

This error messages are output by
cssd which is a input method of Japanese.
If you don't use Japanese input method cs00, you can stop it by following method.
# /etc/init.d/loc.ja.cssd stop
# mv /etc/rc2.d/S90loc.ja.cssd /etc/rc2.d/_S90loc.ja.cssd

Solaris 8 branded zone and privileges

Hello,
I've just installed a Solaris 8 Branded zone to migrate an old server. The migration worked like a charm, and everything seems ok excepted one thing. The zone must run a Lotus Domino server, so the process needs to bind ports 80, 443 and 389, but it can't.
I've found things about the limitpriv directive for the zone configuration, and the net_privaddr privilege to allow a process to bind ports under 1024.
So now, if I run the process in the non global zone as root, it can bind, but if it is launched as the user notes, it can't.
If I use the ppriv command to see what are the privileges of the process, I see :
1945:   /opt/lotus/notes/latest/sunspa/server
flags = <none>
        E: file_link_any,proc_exec,proc_fork,proc_info,proc_session
        I: file_link_any,proc_exec,proc_fork,proc_info,proc_session
        P: file_link_any,proc_exec,proc_fork,proc_info,proc_session
        L: contract_event,contract_observer,file_chown,file_chown_self,file_dac_execute,file_dac_read,file_dac_search,
        file_dac_write,file_link_any,file_owner,file_setid,ipc_dac_read,ipc_dac_write,ipc_owner,net_bindmlp,net_icmpaccess,
        net_mac_aware,net_privaddr,net_rawaccess,proc_audit,proc_chroot,proc_exec,proc_fork,proc_info,proc_lock_memory,
        proc_owner,proc_session,proc_setid,proc_taskid,sys_acct,sys_admin,sys_audit,sys_mount,sys_nfs,sys_resourceSo, the net_privaddr appears in the limit, but it is not enabled. How can I make it enabled for that process?
Thanks

Thanks for the link, good explanations about privileges but they seem unusable in Solaris 8 branded zone. It suggests to create a role with the privileges my process needs, using the "rolemod -K" command, but this option does not exist for the rolemod command in my Solaris 8 zone, it just supports "classic" RBAC.
Maybe the solution would be to create the good profile for the user running the process, but I'm a little bit lost with RBAC and I can't find an existing profile corresponding to what I want.
Actually, the limitpriv for my zone is "default,net_rawaccess,net_privaddr,file_dac_read" and that's all. I added net_privaddr and file_dac_read because I saw that a "ppriv -D" on the Lotus server complained about the lack of these privileges, but in fact they are already included in default privileges.

Multithreading issue on Solaris 8 branded zone

Hi,
We are facing a multithreading problem in Solaris 8 container (branded zone) on Solaris 10.
The core file shows 2 LWPs for a single thread.
First LWP
(dbx) lwp
current LWP ($lwp) is l@1403
(dbx) print this->m_ThreadId->m_IdImpl.m_PosixId
this->m_ThreadId.m_IdImpl.m_PosixId = 1404U
Second LWP
(dbx) lwp
current LWP ($lwp) is l@1404
(dbx) print this->m_ThreadId->m_IdImpl.m_PosixId
this->m_ThreadId.m_IdImpl.m_PosixId = 1404U
Another point to note is that dbx returns 'MT support is disabled' for this program even though it has been built using the -mt option. The dbx version is Sun Dbx Debugger 7.5 2005/10/13.
As far as I have read, the Solaris 8 branded zone uses the alternate T2 thread library. Note also that this program is linked with the alternate thread library @ /usr/lib/lwp.
This alternate thread library is supposed to use the 1:1 thread model.
Can someone explain why are we then seeing 2 LWPs for a single thread ?
Thanks,
Best regards,
Raj Iyer

This error messages are output by
cssd which is a input method of Japanese.
If you don't use Japanese input method cs00, you can stop it by following method.
# /etc/init.d/loc.ja.cssd stop
# mv /etc/rc2.d/S90loc.ja.cssd /etc/rc2.d/_S90loc.ja.cssd

Solaris 10-Branded Zone

Hi,
I am trying to establish whether the following configuration is officially supported (and documented):
"Non-Global zone running a release of Solaris 10 which is older than the release of Solaris 10 running in the Global Zone".
I'm familiar with the idea of Branded Zones to support Solaris 8, 9 & some Linux kernels, and have seen some forum posts where people have created Solaris 10-branded zones, but haven't really seen anything that puts the official seal of approval on that configuration. Also I'm familiar with LDOMs and appreciate that I could get to where I want to be that way too.
Any help welcome.
Thanks,
Paul.

This will be supported in Solaris 10 Upate 9 to a degree, using p2v. Below is a reply I had to a request I'd put in. You might also want to read this
http://blogs.sun.com/jerrysblog/entry/zones_p2v
Hi Sean,
I got information that p2v project is being backported for S10u9
This means, that you will be able to install a native zone from a flar.
I don't have detailed information at the moment, how this will work in terms of
patching in combination with Global Zone and other sibling NGZ's.
+According to Jerry Jelinek, Solaris10-branded zones will not being backported to Solaris 10,+
Got this info yesterday evening from Jerry.
I'll provide some more info about the p2v project for native zones in coming Solaris 10_U9,
once I got more details.
So, I'd suggest to check, whether the mentioned p2v project with flar on native zones might fit your requirements.
Thanks,
Alfred
Edited by: ftoomsh on Sep 2, 2010 3:02 AM

How to unlock Root Account in non-global zone on Solaris 10 Branded Zone

Hello All,
I have a phsical x86 server running Solaris 11. On top of that, I have 3 Solaris 10 branded zones configured. Due to security policy the root account has been locked by 5 failed login attempts.
Is there a way by which I can unlock root account in non-global zone.
I have the root access of global zone.
Pls help as these are production servers.
Regards

Hey,
It worked. Actually i forgot to save the file.
I changed the /<zonepath>/root/etc/shadow
Removed *LK* & then from global zone did zlogin -l root zonename
Thanks lot.

Add zfs volume to Solaris 8 branded zone

Hi,
I need to add a zfs volume to a Solaris 8 branded zone.
Basically ive created the zvol and added the following to the zone configuration.
# zonecfg -z test
zonecfg:test> add device
zonecfg:test:device> set match=/dev/zvol/dsk/sol8/vol
zonecfg:test:device> end
When I boot the zone it comes up ok but I am unable to see the device, nothing in format, /dev/dsk etc etc
Ive also tried to setmatch to the raw device as well to no avail.
Basically I have numerous zvols to add and dont really want a load of mount points from the global zone then lofs back to the local zone
Any ideas please??
Thanks...

Thanks but that's why I created zfs volumes and newfs'ed them to create UFS and presented those to the zone.
In the end I just create a script in /etc/rc2.d and mounted the filesystems in there.

Creating a Solaris 8 branded zone

I am in the process of configuring a Solaris 8 branded zone using the SUNWsolaris8 package and the instructions in the Solaris8 Container Guide. Solaris 10 08/07 is installed in the global zone. I have the following kernel patches installed as required: 127111-08 and 128548-08. I get the following error after configuring the zone when I try to verify the zone:
-bash-3.00# zonecfg -z gfxc-qazone
gfxc-qazone: No such zone configured
Use 'create' to begin configuring a new zone.
zonecfg:gfxc-qazone> create -t SUNWsolaris8
zonecfg:gfxc-qazone> set autoboot=true
zonecfg:gfxc-qazone> set zonepath=/export/zones/gfxc-qazone
zonecfg:gfxc-qazone> add attr
zonecfg:gfxc-qazone:attr> set name=machine
zonecfg:gfxc-qazone:attr> set type=string
zonecfg:gfxc-qazone:attr> set value=sun4u
zonecfg:gfxc-qazone:attr> end
zonecfg:gfxc-qazone> verify
gfxc-qazone: unknown brand.
gfxc-qazone: Invalid document
I cannot find any other information anywhere on this error. I am hoping those that have successfully installed a Solaris 8 branded zone can help me out. Thanks.

I have installed the SUNWs8brand packages before I started the configuration and I also installed the patch. I am not sure what you mean if the package installed in the correct order. I cannot find what I am missing. The original installation for the global zone was using the SUNCreq with other packages added during the installation. I realized after the O/S installation that I needed the zone packages as well as the live upgrade packages. After installing those packages I installed the SUNWs8brand packages. Let me know if there is something else that I am missing. I am thinking of re-installing the O/S with the End User software group.

Solaris 8 branded zone not booting after server reboot hangs at ready state

Hi,
For ipchange/hostname change we rebooted the physical server...once rebooting the Solaris brand 8 zone stucks at ready state.
I have run the truss with zoneadm in the log process sleep and wait
Will post the log soon..any help to troubleshoot the issue
Both global zone and Ng zone having same hostid..
dmesg::
Apr 30 13:08:50 xyz zoneadmd[992]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] [zone 'abc'] WARNING: console /devices//pseudo/zconsnex@1/zcons@0 found, but it could not be removed.: I/O error
bash-3.00# ps -ef|grep -i abc
root 1441 1429 0 13:10:56 ? 0:00 /bin/ksh -p /usr/lib/brand/solaris8/s8_boot abc /abc
root 1429 1 0 13:10:55 ? 0:00 zoneadmd -z abc
root 1427 1397 0 13:10:54 pts/3 0:00 zoneadm -z abc boot -f -s
root 1542 1441 0 13:10:56 ? 0:00 /bin/ksh -p /usr/lib/brand/solaris8/s8_boot abc /abc
zoneadm list -cv
2 abc ready /abc solaris8 shared
Thanks
Edited by: muvvas on Apr 30, 2012 2:25 PM

moved the solaris 8 branded zone to other server.their its working fine.sorry for late reply.

Inetd services (telnet, rlogin ,rsh) in Solaris 9 Branded Zone

Hi,
I've got two Solaris 9 Branded Zones running on an M3000. They both use exclusive IP.
When I try and telnet, rlogin or rsh to either of my Solaris 9 zones from the other I get an error. With the r* commands I get a "Protocol error" message, and telnet just reports a terminated connection. I've tried Mr. Google, the results I get make sense for a physical host - i.e Protocol Error would occur if the server executable (in.rlogind, etc) was somehow messed up.
Just to complicate things slightly the exclusive IP NICs are on a physically separate switch from the other NICs.
I'd forgotten that with the Branded Zones some native features are actually handled by the underlying global zone (i.e. Solaris 10).
Anyway, has anybody else had this same problem and how did you resolve it?
Thanks
Tim Shaw.

I found out that the services in the Global Zone had been disabled. Simply enabling them fixed the problem :)

How do I maintain a Solaris 10 branded zone?

I'm not sure whether I should be putting this on the Solaris 10 or the Solaris 11 discussion since Solaris 10 branded zones run on top of Solaris 11 but I decided to put it here. I also apologize is this is clearly documented somewhere but if it is I've not found it.
Once I've moved a Solaris 10 system or zone to a "Solaris 10 branded zone" how do I maintain it. As far as I can determine, I cannot apply maintenance updates to it (ie. go from Solaris 10 9/10 to Solaris 10 8/11). Attempts to apply the associated patch bundles seem to fail in the checking out the system code. So it appears that I'm stuck with simple patching. It also appears that you can't use Live Upgrade which means that you might destabilize the zone during patching which makes it awkward if you need to maintain uptime. Furthermore, if appears that backing out the kernel patch in the zone (on Intel at least) can clobber libc.so.1 which clobbers the zone (thank heaven for ZFS snapshots - rollback!).
What is the safest way to patch these zones? Yes, I could recreate the zone from a Solaris 10 system but I'm thinking down the road where we're running Solaris 11 and Solaris 10 exists only in zones.

I've not received an answer to this so I've started rolling my own procedure which I hope will work well; however, it seems that there should be some information available from Oracle about this.

Solaris 10 local zone setup requirement/steps for am/ps 7.0 installation

Hi,
Is there any document available on solaris 10 local zone creation/requirement for am server/ portal server 7.0 install? Any help/pointer is appreciated.
Thanks,

I don't believe there is any specific documentation am/portal in a zone. And as far as I know there are no specific requirements either. I have successfully installed portal in a solaris zone.
A good starter tutorial on zones is here: http://partneradvantage.sun.com/protected/solaris10/adoptionkit/tech/zones/tutorial.html
Hi,
Is there any document available on solaris 10 local
zone creation/requirement for am server/ portal
server 7.0 install? Any help/pointer is
appreciated.
Thanks,

Possible to upgrade Solaris 9 branded zone to 10?

We have an application running in a Solaris 9 branded zone. The application version is not compatible with Solaris 10, however, the next version of the application is compatible with Solaris 10.
So the plan is to upgrade the application in the branded zone, then upgrade the branded zone to Solaris 10.
All the reading I have found so far indicates that it is not possible to upgrade a Solaris 9 branded zone to !0.
Can it be done, and if so, pointers to a documented process would be helpful.

fog-on-the-tyne wrote:
We have an application running in a Solaris 9 branded zone. The application version is not compatible with Solaris 10, however, the next version of the application is compatible with Solaris 10.
So the plan is to upgrade the application in the branded zone, then upgrade the branded zone to Solaris 10.If the next version is compatible with Solaris 10 then backup the data,
create a new Solaris 10 zone
install the new version into the zone
migrate the data
test
destroy the now unnecessary Solaris 9 branded zone.
For something like this play in a dev environment first.
alan

Cloning Solaris 10 with zones

What is the best method to use when cloning a Solaris machine with zones, to ensure all software is included and can be easily installed
on new hardware?
Thank you!

If you use UFS, then ufsdump/ufsrestore
If you use ZFS, then zfs send/zfs receive
But, if you are using hardware or software RAID, you can also try to move one disk to an another machine.
You can see with these simple examples, that you have several methods and it depends how you configured your machine, Solaris and the zones. And finally, it depends too what is the source machine and what is the target machine, and how they are configured.

11gR2 scan and scan listeners are not starting in Solaris non globa zones

Hi,
my configuration is a 2 node RAC. each node is a solaris container/ zones on two phyiscally different machines.
(SunOS 5.10 Generic_147440-07 sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise).
after installation of GI, root.sh was successful but failed when trying to start the following resources
ora.scan1.vip
ora.scan2.vip
ora.scan3.vip
the scans are not in the host file but on DNS, the GI home has been patched with January 2012 GI PSU.
Has any one successfully installed 11gR2 RAC on Solaris non global zones? if you have tell me how you got past the scan issue.
***** rootcrs_db01.log ******
PRCR-1079 : Failed to start resource ora.scan1.vip
CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan1.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'db01' failed
CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan1.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
PRCR-1079 : Failed to start resource ora.scan2.vip
CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan2.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'db01' failed
CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan2.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
PRCR-1079 : Failed to start resource ora.scan3.vip
CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan3.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'db01' failed
CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan3.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.497 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1536] About to doQueryResources: eType resource, nodeName null, filter (TYPE == ora.scan_vip.type)
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.532 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1544] found 3 resources
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.532 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1546]      ora.scan1.vip
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.533 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1546]      ora.scan2.vip
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.533 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalQueryResources:1546]      ora.scan3.vip
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.564 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan1.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.565 WAT ] [ScanVIPImpl.<init>:164] ordinal number is 1
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.587 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan1.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.609 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan2.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.610 WAT ] [ScanVIPImpl.<init>:164] ordinal number is 2
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.631 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan2.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.653 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan3.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.654 WAT ] [ScanVIPImpl.<init>:164] ordinal number is 3
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.674 WAT ] [CRSNative.isEntityRegistered:734] entity: ora.scan3.vip, type: 1, registered: true
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.675 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:373] About to start resource: Name: ora.scan1.vip, force:true node: null, options: 0, filter null
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:25:38.702 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip false CRS-2672: Attempting to start 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:39.079 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip true CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan1.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.730 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip true CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' failed
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.731 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip false CRS-2679: Attempting to clean 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.743 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip false CRS-2681: Clean of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' succeeded
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.746 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan1.vip true CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan1.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.750 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addComp:162] add comp: name ora.scan1.vip, rc 223, msg CRS-0223: Resource 'ora.scan1.vip' has placement error.
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.752 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:386] Failed to start resource: Name: ora.scan1.vip, node: null, filter: null, msg CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan1.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan1.vip' on 'db01' failed
CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan1.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.754 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:373] About to start resource: Name: ora.scan2.vip, force:true node: null, options: 0, filter null
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:26:42.778 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip false CRS-2672: Attempting to start 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:43.132 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip true CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan2.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.805 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip true CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' failed
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.806 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip false CRS-2679: Attempting to clean 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.820 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip false CRS-2681: Clean of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' succeeded
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.822 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan2.vip true CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan2.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.826 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addComp:162] add comp: name ora.scan2.vip, rc 223, msg CRS-0223: Resource 'ora.scan2.vip' has placement error.
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.827 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:386] Failed to start resource: Name: ora.scan2.vip, node: null, filter: null, msg CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan2.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan2.vip' on 'db01' failed
CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan2.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.828 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:373] About to start resource: Name: ora.scan3.vip, force:true node: null, options: 0, filter null
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:27:46.855 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip false CRS-2672: Attempting to start 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:47.212 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip true CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan3.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.881 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip true CRS-2674: Start of 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' failed
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.883 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip false CRS-2679: Attempting to clean 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01'
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.895 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip false CRS-2681: Clean of 'ora.scan3.vip' on 'ojesmdb01' succeeded
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.898 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addLine:106] callback: ora.scan3.vip true CRS-2632: There are no more servers to try to place resource 'ora.scan3.vip' on that would satisfy its placement policy
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.902 WAT ] [CRSNativeResult.addComp:162] add comp: name ora.scan3.vip, rc 223, msg CRS-0223: Resource 'ora.scan3.vip' has placement error.
[main] [ 2012-04-17 11:28:50.902 WAT ] [CRSNative.internalStartResource:386] Failed to start resource: Name: ora.scan3.vip, node: null, filter: null, msg CRS-5017: The resource action "ora.scan3.vip start" encountered the following error:
Action for VIP aborted
thanks in advance
Samuel K

Hi,
Put here
$ srvctl config scan
$ nslookup <scan_name>
$ ping <all scan vip>Regards,
Levi Pereira

How to create a separate /var partition on solaris non-global zone

Hi
I found no simple way to create a separate /var partition in solaris non-global zone.
I am using solaris 10 u9 and my root pool is zfs. My zone's zonepath is also separate zfs fs.
But, I do not know how to make the /var as a mountpoint of another zfs dataset since /var is not empty.
I also do not know if there is a way to install a zone with /var as a separate (outside '/') partition.
That will be really useful.
Any suggestion?
Thanks
Edited by: vadud3 on Sep 20, 2010 12:16 PM

I meant a separate zfs fs with mountpoint '/var' in a non-global zone.
I am insisting, because I do not want /var to fill up the '/' on non-global zone.
With default non-global zone installation, you cannot avoid that.
My zonepath itself is a zfs fs. I also have a zfs dataset provisioned to the non-global zone.
I cannot create a zfs fs out of that dataset and mount it as '/var' becasue by then non-global zone
already installed content on '/var'
I want the '/var' as a separate dir or mountpoint, the same reason global zone gives you that option during install.
Thanks

Solaris 11.2 Zones

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for