[solved itself] cpupower doesn't scale ivy bridge high enough

Not sure if I should have put this in the testing section, the kernel section or here. But I try here.
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz
My problem is:
$ analyzing CPU 0:
driver: acpi-cpufreq
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0
maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
hardware limits: 1.20 GHz - 2.20 GHz
available frequency steps: 2.20 GHz, 2.20 GHz, 2.10 GHz, 2.00 GHz, 1.90 GHz, 1.80 GHz, 1.70 GHz, 1.60 GHz, 1.50 GHz, 1.40 GHz, 1.30 GHz, 1.20 GHz
available cpufreq governors: userspace, conservative, ondemand, performance
current policy: frequency should be within 1.20 GHz and 1.60 GHz.
The governor "conservative" may decide which speed to use
within this range.
current CPU frequency is 1.20 GHz.
boost state support:
Supported: yes
Active: yes
"current policy: frequency should be within 1.20 GHz and 1.60 GHz."
Why is the maximum of the current policy 1.6 GHz and not 2.2GHz? cpupower knows it can scale up to 2.20GHz. i7z confirms that it never clocks above 1.6GHz when running stress -c 1.
So to make sure no automatism screws with it:
$ sudo cpupower frequency-set -g userspace
$ sudo cpupower frequency-set -f 2.20GHz
But still:
$ cpupower frequency-info
analyzing CPU 0:
driver: acpi-cpufreq
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0
maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
hardware limits: 1.20 GHz - 2.20 GHz
available frequency steps: 2.20 GHz, 2.20 GHz, 2.10 GHz, 2.00 GHz, 1.90 GHz, 1.80 GHz, 1.70 GHz, 1.60 GHz, 1.50 GHz, 1.40 GHz, 1.30 GHz, 1.20 GHz
available cpufreq governors: userspace, conservative, ondemand, performance
current policy: frequency should be within 1.20 GHz and 1.60 GHz.
The governor "userspace" may decide which speed to use
within this range.
current CPU frequency is 1.60 GHz.
boost state support:
Supported: yes
Active: yes
It won't go above 1.6 GHz.
What can I do to convince it to clock to the maximum frequency, and to use "turbo boost" when appropriate?
Edit: I have since rebooted again and this time I see this:
$ cpupower frequency-info
analyzing CPU 0:
driver: acpi-cpufreq
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0
maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
hardware limits: 1.20 GHz - 2.20 GHz
available frequency steps: 2.20 GHz, 2.20 GHz, 2.10 GHz, 2.00 GHz, 1.90 GHz, 1.80 GHz, 1.70 GHz, 1.60 GHz, 1.50 GHz, 1.40 GHz, 1.30 GHz, 1.20 GHz
available cpufreq governors: conservative, ondemand, performance
current policy: frequency should be within 1.20 GHz and 2.20 GHz.
The governor "conservative" may decide which speed to use
within this range.
current CPU frequency is 1.20 GHz.
boost state support:
Supported: yes
Active: yes
So at least it does clock to the official maximum. i7z doesn't show turbo boost though. Is it a i7z limitation for ivy bridge?
edit2:
After another reboot it works completely. Weird.
Last edited by Cdh (2012-10-12 08:33:58)

Probably same issue here, cant switch frequency at all. At some point it worked, now doesnt work at all. Tried to use Jupiter, but it was unable to change anything when started automatically, so when I removed it from autostart it started to work, but only for 1-2 reboots.
I'm using Core i5 CPU.
Edit:
After suspend it behaves like ondemand, but still very strange behavior + I cant change XFCE settings on acpi events.
Edit again:
I installed jupiter again, but this time i added ROOT user to group jupiter instead of adding it only for my user. Now it works! Switches correctly. 4 reboots. But when closing laptop lid it still goes to sleep instead of black screen....
Try unchecking "Monitor power management control" in power settings if using XFCE, maybe it helps too. My advices!
Last edited by kellerman (2012-10-22 17:53:19)

Similar Messages

  • FIFO Underruns in newer versions of Linux using the Ivy Bridge cpus

    I have been getting consistent results from my Lenovo Z580 where an error will apear when upgrading to a newer version of linux past 3.15.8. More specifically a "[drm:cpt_serr_int_handler] *ERROR* PCH transcoder A FIFO underrun".  This also includes transcoder B.
    I found the bug report https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/40952?p … sort2=desc  which near to the bottom of the page someone has stated building the kernel from git fixes the issue. There was aslo some reports on updating the bios to solve the issue but on the bios I have is current based on the lenovo support site http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product … s/DS100928.
    lscpu info:
    Architecture: x86_64
    CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
    Byte Order: Little Endian
    CPU(s): 4
    On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3
    Thread(s) per core: 2
    Core(s) per socket: 2
    Socket(s): 1
    NUMA node(s): 1
    Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
    CPU family: 6
    Model: 58
    Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz
    Stepping: 9
    CPU MHz: 1210.253
    CPU max MHz: 3100.0000
    CPU min MHz: 1200.0000
    BogoMIPS: 4990.71
    Virtualization: VT-x
    L1d cache: 32K
    L1i cache: 32K
    L2 cache: 256K
    L3 cache: 3072K
    NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-3
    lspci info
    00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor DRAM Controller (rev 09)
    00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09)
    00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family USB xHCI Host Controller (rev 04)
    00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 (rev 04)
    00:1a.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #2 (rev 04)
    00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family High Definition Audio Controller (rev 04)
    00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 1 (rev c4)
    00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 2 (rev c4)
    00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 3 (rev c4)
    00:1d.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #1 (rev 04)
    00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation HM76 Express Chipset LPC Controller (rev 04)
    00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series Chipset Family 6-port SATA Controller [AHCI mode] (rev 04)
    00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 7 Series/C210 Series Chipset Family SMBus Controller (rev 04)
    02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller (rev 05)
    03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Centrino Wireless-N 2200 (rev c4)
    lsmod info
    Module Size Used by
    fuse 84249 3
    ctr 3927 2
    ccm 8278 2
    xt_tcpudp 3207 3
    ipt_MASQUERADE 2250 1
    ip6t_rpfilter 1740 1
    ip6t_REJECT 3980 18
    ipt_REJECT 2505 20
    xt_conntrack 3425 7
    ebtable_nat 1916 0
    ebtable_filter 1927 0
    ebtable_broute 1493 0
    bridge 100134 1 ebtable_broute
    stp 1653 1 bridge
    llc 3729 2 stp,bridge
    ebtables 24586 3 ebtable_broute,ebtable_nat,ebtable_filter
    ip6table_raw 1352 1
    ip6table_mangle 1620 1
    ip6table_filter 1556 1
    ip6table_security 1372 1
    ip6table_nat 3585 1
    nf_conntrack_ipv6 9661 5
    nf_defrag_ipv6 26126 1 nf_conntrack_ipv6
    nf_nat_ipv6 3736 1 ip6table_nat
    ip6_tables 17729 5 ip6table_filter,ip6table_mangle,ip6table_security,ip6table_nat,ip6table_raw
    iptable_raw 1348 1
    iptable_mangle 1616 1
    iptable_filter 1552 1
    iptable_security 1368 1
    iptable_nat 3454 1
    nf_conntrack_ipv4 9474 4
    nf_defrag_ipv4 1499 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4
    nf_nat_ipv4 3728 1 iptable_nat
    nf_nat 13368 5 ipt_MASQUERADE,nf_nat_ipv4,nf_nat_ipv6,ip6table_nat,iptable_nat
    nf_conntrack 80172 9 ipt_MASQUERADE,nf_nat,nf_nat_ipv4,nf_nat_ipv6,xt_conntrack,ip6table_nat,iptable_nat,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_conntrack_ipv6
    ip_tables 18115 5 iptable_security,iptable_filter,iptable_mangle,iptable_nat,iptable_raw
    x_tables 17344 17 iptable_security,ip6table_filter,ip6table_mangle,ip6t_rpfilter,ip_tables,xt_tcpudp,ipt_MASQUERADE,ip6table_security,xt_conntrack,iptable_filter,ip6table_raw,ebtables,ipt_REJECT,iptable_mangle,ip6_tables,iptable_raw,ip6t_REJECT
    uvcvideo 74983 0
    videobuf2_vmalloc 3368 1 uvcvideo
    videobuf2_memops 2239 1 videobuf2_vmalloc
    videobuf2_core 30407 1 uvcvideo
    arc4 2064 2
    videodev 123032 2 uvcvideo,videobuf2_core
    coretemp 6388 0
    rts5139 313272 0
    iwldvm 170735 0
    media 12611 2 uvcvideo,videodev
    hwmon 3346 1 coretemp
    joydev 10367 0
    mousedev 10912 0
    snd_hda_codec_hdmi 40396 1
    led_class 3611 1 iwldvm
    intel_rapl 12460 0
    x86_pkg_temp_thermal 7311 0
    mac80211 495361 1 iwldvm
    intel_powerclamp 9442 0
    kvm_intel 135528 0
    snd_hda_codec_realtek 54803 1
    snd_hda_codec_generic 56366 1 snd_hda_codec_realtek
    snd_hda_intel 22831 4
    snd_hda_controller 22975 1 snd_hda_intel
    snd_hda_codec 104665 5 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec_generic,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_controller
    kvm 408583 1 kvm_intel
    iTCO_wdt 5663 0
    psmouse 94918 0
    iTCO_vendor_support 1929 1 iTCO_wdt
    pcspkr 2059 0
    microcode 17157 0
    serio_raw 5073 0
    snd_hwdep 6652 1 snd_hda_codec
    evdev 11784 14
    snd_pcm 83207 4 snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_controller
    ideapad_laptop 10439 0
    ac 3595 0
    thermal 9103 0
    sparse_keymap 3242 1 ideapad_laptop
    battery 7885 0
    iwlwifi 148746 1 iwldvm
    r8169 59191 0
    mii 4251 1 r8169
    cfg80211 437959 3 iwlwifi,mac80211,iwldvm
    snd_timer 19294 1 snd_pcm
    snd 61276 16 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hwdep,snd_timer,snd_hda_codec_hdmi,snd_pcm,snd_hda_codec_generic,snd_hda_codec,snd_hda_intel
    wmi 8539 0
    rfkill 15971 3 cfg80211,ideapad_laptop
    shpchp 25706 0
    mei_me 10096 0
    mei 66784 1 mei_me
    lpc_ich 14008 0
    mac_hid 3273 0
    soundcore 5551 2 snd,snd_hda_codec
    i2c_i801 11364 0
    processor 25153 0
    ext4 494420 2
    crc16 1359 1 ext4
    mbcache 9155 1 ext4
    jbd2 82948 1 ext4
    algif_skcipher 6387 0
    af_alg 5020 1 algif_skcipher
    dm_crypt 17527 1
    dm_mod 85258 3 dm_crypt
    sr_mod 15026 0
    cdrom 35191 1 sr_mod
    sd_mod 37554 3
    crc_t10dif 1135 1 sd_mod
    atkbd 17006 0
    libps2 4571 2 atkbd,psmouse
    crct10dif_pclmul 4714 1
    crct10dif_common 1436 2 crct10dif_pclmul,crc_t10dif
    crc32_pclmul 2955 0
    crc32c_intel 14217 0
    ghash_clmulni_intel 4362 0
    xhci_hcd 149286 0
    aesni_intel 144871 6
    aes_x86_64 7463 1 aesni_intel
    lrw 3821 1 aesni_intel
    gf128mul 6018 1 lrw
    glue_helper 4737 1 aesni_intel
    ahci 24299 2
    ablk_helper 2100 1 aesni_intel
    cryptd 8537 4 ghash_clmulni_intel,aesni_intel,ablk_helper
    libahci 21772 1 ahci
    libata 174153 2 ahci,libahci
    ehci_pci 4152 0
    ehci_hcd 64619 1 ehci_pci
    scsi_mod 138333 4 rts5139,libata,sd_mod,sr_mod
    usbcore 188509 5 uvcvideo,rts5139,ehci_hcd,ehci_pci,xhci_hcd
    usb_common 1712 1 usbcore
    i8042 13666 2 libps2,ideapad_laptop
    serio 11018 9 serio_raw,atkbd,i8042,psmouse
    i915 797177 2
    video 12057 1 i915
    button 4765 1 i915
    intel_gtt 12856 1 i915
    i2c_algo_bit 5480 1 i915
    drm_kms_helper 39643 1 i915
    drm 244846 4 i915,drm_kms_helper
    i2c_core 41648 6 drm,i915,i2c_i801,drm_kms_helper,i2c_algo_bit,videodev
    journalctl of a previous attempt
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: input: Lid Switch as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0D:00/input/input0
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: ACPI: Lid Switch [LID0]
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: input: Sleep Button as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0E:00/input/input1
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: ACPI: Sleep Button [SLPB]
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: input: Power Button as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0C:00/input/input2
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: ACPI: Power Button [PWRB]
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: input: Power Button as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00/input/input3
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: ACPI: Power Button [PWRF]
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: [drm] Memory usable by graphics device = 2048M
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: checking generic (e0000000 410000) vs hw (e0000000 10000000)
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: fb: switching to inteldrmfb from VESA VGA
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: i915 0000:00:02.0: irq 40 for MSI/MSI-X
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013).
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query.
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: vgaarb: device changed decodes: PCI:0000:00:02.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=io+mem:owns=io+mem
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb0) is primary device
    Aug 15 11:11:23 jdlptp kernel: [drm:cpt_serr_int_handler] *ERROR* PCH transcoder A FIFO underrun
    I've tested all the kernels > 3.15.8  but they seem to create the error above. My questions are
    Was there a change in the linux kernel options from 3.15.8?
    Am I using / missing a module that I shouldn't / should be using for my cpu?
    Last edited by acothi (2014-10-06 02:49:39)

    Hi acothi,
    I was getting the same error message for months. Linux kernel 3.16.3-1 finally fixed it for me. My system: Intel Ivy-Bridge i5-3570K CPU + Intel DH77DF Mobo with latest BIOS (dated 2013). Please update to latest kernel in [Core] and report back. However, I don't think that your SD card slot issues are directly related to this error message. I also recommend installing linux-lts kernel and adding a bootloader entry, so you can still be productive, even if the latest Linux kernel doesn't fix it for you.
    Afaik, this error has nothing to do with kernel options, but was introduced by a usual kernel commit (and seems to be fixed upstream).
    Cheers,
    Tolga
    Last edited by tolga9009 (2014-10-06 16:47:02)

  • P67A-GD55 (B3) bios update to Ivy Bridge, question regarding PCIe-3

    Hi,
    Ive just updated my P67A-GD55 (B3) to the 4.0 BIOS for Ivy Bridge and I am a little confused as to whether of not I will be able to benfit from PCIe-3 support on a Ivy Bridge CPU?
    I intend to run 2 x GTX 680 in SLI, will I still be limited to PCIe-2 of can my board now take advantage of PCI-e 3?
    Many thanks in advance.

    For PCI-E 3.0, a Z68 G3 series mainboard with an Ivy CPU would be needed at the minimum. So far, you are not really missing anything anyway. PCI-E 3.0 doesn't seem to be reported as providing all that much of a performance benefit with current apps, programs, and games.
    Having tested GTX 680 on the P67, I must say it is in itself running PCI-E 2.0 very impressive.

  • H8-1260t / IPISB-CH2 (Chicago) - Can HP add support for Ivy Bridge processors?

    The latest UEFI BIOS upgrade for this Sandy Bridge H67-based motherboard is 7.12, dated 10/12/2011. The chipset has the capability to run Ivy Bridge CPUs (released Q4 2011) with a BIOS update to the microcode table (add the CPUID table entries for the 306xx CPUs to the 209xx Sandy Bridge CPUs already in the table, that's all!). I have checked the BIOS using AMI's MMtool, and BIOS ver 7.12 only supports Sandy Bridge CPUs. Can customers using the IPISB-CH2 motherboard, like me, get a BIOS update to support IvyBridge CPUs? -imsai8080 ref:http://www.asrock.com/news/events/2012ivy/ Please note that ASRock is the end-user sales department of Pegatron, which made the IPISB-CH2 motherboard for HP.H67DE3 looks very like the "Chicago" board. further ref:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_1155http://www.techpowerup.com/153756/ivy-bridge-quad-core-to-have-77w-tdp-intel-plans-for-lga1155-ivy-bridge-entry.html     

    Big_Dave wrote:
    Hi, The HP H8-1260t PC was Introduced on 13 January 2012.  HP generally will only post BIOS updates when needed within twelve months from the Introduction Date (1/13/2012).  Some manufacturers have furnished BIOS updates to support IVY Bridge processors for retail motherboards but has has not posted an IVY Bridge BIOS update for the "Chicago" motherboard.Big_Dave wrote:
    Hi, The HP H8-1260t PC was Introduced on 13 January 2012. HP generally will only post BIOS updates when needed within twelve months from the Introduction Date (1/13/2012). Some manufacturers have furnished BIOS updates to support IVY Bridge processors for retail motherboards but has has not posted an IVY Bridge BIOS update for the "Chicago" motherboard.VH2:BIOS 7.12A does NOT support Ivy Bridge. I have examined the microcode and there is no support for it, though there is pleanty of room to add it. The BIOS itself is dated 10/12/2011. Simply download the update, change the file extension to .zip, look in the zip, and you'll see the actual mod date for CHG_712_Signed.rom file is 10/12/2011. All they did was update the sp56123.rtf file on 2/14/2012, and later moved it the newer Support format in 4/21/2013 (no files were changed internally). I don't know why they improperly dated it for 4/13. Hope that answers your question, although not the answer either of us wanted.Just to confirm, that's what I'm currently running on a h8-1260t, and 10/12/2011 is the date embedded in the BIOS as well.Big_Dave:Both of us understand that Pegatron is not a retail supplier, and requests for BIOS updates come from the customer, HP. The Ivy Bridge processors were released April 2012, 4 months after the intro of the Chicago board, and ASRock, the *retail* side of Pegatron, announced that all 2nd gen Sandy Bridge mobos (including the H67 motherboards) would have Ivy Bridge support added. IMHO, HP should have requested a BIOS upgrade for their 2nd gen Sandy Bridge Pegatron-based HP motherboards. Obviously, that didn't happen, since their only update is actually dated 10/2011 (see above).It doesn't seem unreasonable to me for HP to drop an request to Pegatron, a *current* motherboard supplier for HP, to cut an upgrade to support the HP motherboards derived fom the retail motherboards Pegatron already have upgraded circa 3 months after the release of the HP (Pegatron) "Chicago" motherboard, which looks AMAZINGLY like the ASRock (Pegatron retail) H67DE3 with the dual graphics support removed (standard for HP), SATA 4 & 5 moved to board edge, and HP proprietary frontpanel connector added in the original place for the H67DE3 SATA 4 & 5 <grin>. Probably a couple minutes with the right BIOS tools and updated microcode from Intel (which I also have!), to support all Chicago-based systems. I'm hoping that maybe a HP Support rep can chime in on this, or someone can tell me where to find tools to recompile to add the SAFUWIN-compatible checksums to a modded BIOS? -Imsai8080 P.S. If it wasn't for the code checksums and the nonstandard SAFUWIN flash programmer, I would already have added the Ivy Bridge microcode myself. Gave it a try, no go so far, but I might keep trying. 

  • Envy 15t-3200 (Ivy Bridge) WLAN PCI Card Replacement

    Hello everyone! I just had a quick question - it's rather specific, so I'm just posting to see if anyone happens to have experience with this. Basically, I'm looking to replace the built-in WLAN adapter in my Envy 15t-3200 (CTO). Right now, it has the stock Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6235 WLAN adapter. This adapter isn't bad by any means, but I'm in the process of upgrading a few parts in my laptop (SSD, RAM) to give it a little refresh, and I'd like to see if I can replace the WLAN adapter as well. The one that I'd like to replace it with is the Intel 7260-Wireless AC adapter (with bluetooth). Hardware-wise, I think everything will work out great. However, the one hesitation I have is the rumored WLAN "whitelist" that may be hardcoded into some HP laptops. So, if anyone has successfully replaced their WLAN adapter in an Ivy Bridge gen. Envy 15t (especially the 3200 CTO), I'd really like to hear about it!
    TL;DR: I want to replace the WLAN adapter in my Envy 15t-3200 (CTO, Ivy Bridge gen.) but I'm worried about whether or not the HP BIOS will allow me to boot up once I do.
    Like I said, I'm not expecting this to be an easy-to-answer, straightfoward question. It's probably something that can only be answered by someone else who has tried the same thing. Anyways, I'll probably end up ordering the new WLAN card to try it out since I can send it back if it doesn't work. I'll post my results here if I end up going for it!
    P.S. I did search the forums and found one other topic about this same issue: http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Hardware-Upgrades-Replacements/HE-Envy-15-2013-Network-Card-upgrade/m-p...
    It seems like it ended up working for those users, but I think they're talking about a newer (Haswell gen.) Envy laptop. Thanks in advance to anyone who replies/reads this!
    Edit: So I just noticed that the service/maintenance manual lists the WLAN module as an "end-user serviceable part," so it seems like this may work after all. I went ahead and ordered the part (from here), and I still plan on updating this post once I perform the switch.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    cgatno wrote:
    Hello everyone! I just had a quick question - it's rather specific, so I'm just posting to see if anyone happens to have experience with this. Basically, I'm looking to replace the built-in WLAN adapter in my Envy 15t-3200 (CTO). Right now, it has the stock Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6235 WLAN adapter. This adapter isn't bad by any means, but I'm in the process of upgrading a few parts in my laptop (SSD, RAM) to give it a little refresh, and I'd like to see if I can replace the WLAN adapter as well. The one that I'd like to replace it with is the Intel 7260-Wireless AC adapter (with bluetooth). Hardware-wise, I think everything will work out great. However, the one hesitation I have is the rumored WLAN "whitelist" that may be hardcoded into some HP laptops. So, if anyone has successfully replaced their WLAN adapter in an Ivy Bridge gen. Envy 15t (especially the 3200 CTO), I'd really like to hear about it!
    TL;DR: I want to replace the WLAN adapter in my Envy 15t-3200 (CTO, Ivy Bridge gen.) but I'm worried about whether or not the HP BIOS will allow me to boot up once I do.
    Like I said, I'm not expecting this to be an easy-to-answer, straightfoward question. It's probably something that can only be answered by someone else who has tried the same thing. Anyways, I'll probably end up ordering the new WLAN card to try it out since I can send it back if it doesn't work. I'll post my results here if I end up going for it!
    P.S. I did search the forums and found one other topic about this same issue: http://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Hardware-Upgrades-Replacements/HE-Envy-15-2013-Network-Card-upgrade/m-p...
    It seems like it ended up working for those users, but I think they're talking about a newer (Haswell gen.) Envy laptop. Thanks in advance to anyone who replies/reads this!
    Edit: So I just noticed that the service/maintenance manual lists the WLAN module as an "end-user serviceable part," so it seems like this may work after all. I went ahead and ordered the part (from here), and I still plan on updating this post once I perform the switch.
    Hi,
    I'm positive it will work. Intel Envy laptops probably don't have the whitelist because I have tried three different Intel wifi cards and all worked. One of them actually had a very old part number (Intel Ultimate 6300). Don't worry it will be ok.
    Dv6-7000 /Full HD/Core i5-3360M/GF 650M/Corsair 8GB/Intel 7260AC/Samsung Pro 256GB
    Testing - HP 15-p000
    HP Touchpad provided by HP
    Currently on Debian Wheeze
    *Please, help other users with the same issue by marking your solved topics as "Accept as Solution"*

  • Pavilion g6-1262sa CPU upgrade v2, Sandy Bridge = Ivy Bridge?

    Hi, thanks to the Pavilion g6-1262sa maintenance and servicing manual and this magnificient forum I've recently found out that replacing my i3-2330m is possible with all sandy bridge processors up to i7-2620m.
    Theese questions may sound silly but I continued my research and I've got couple more ideas to confront with reality.
    I do realise that compatibility is not only matter of fitting the same socket but also bios installed on certain motherboard, however:
    1. Do you think it would be possible to swap Sandy Bridge (2nd gen) i3-2330m for some Ivy Bridge (3rd gen) i5 -3210m? 
    2. Is the 32nm to 22nm manufacturing technology enough difference on it's own (even if the rest of architecture is the same) to prevent this from working? 
    3. Is bios of my g6 motherboard somehow identyfying installed processor? (if it's not on "the list" it will simply not run?" or is it only technical compatibility matter?
    According to some statements which I found on some IT forums and sites (and some self researched facts):
    Socket: both processors are compatible with BGA1023 socket. (at least that's what I found, if someone could confirm I would be grateful)
    Architecture difference: "The 3rd generation is called "Ivy Bridge," and is basically a copy of Sandy Bridge manufactured on a smaller scale, or die. However, Intel also focused on beefing up the integrated graphics in this generation."
    TDP: both are 35 W
    Cores: both are 2 physical (4 Virtual - thanks to hyperthreading I guess?)
    Power consumption: "the Ivy Bridge CPUs also use less power", "Ivy Bridge consumes a little less power; around 10w i think."
    Temperature: i5 -3210m goes 5*C higher than i3-2330m - shouldn't do much difference
    Looking forward to some replies, RacA
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    It is not a technical (socket) incompatibility since as you likely know Ivy Bridge and Sandy Bridge are backward compatible on most desktop motherboards. However, HP has only implemented 2d gen Intel Core processor compatibility on the HM65 Express chipset which yours has. Motherboards that will support 3rd gen CPUs use the HM77 chipset. There is no other motherboard that will fit in your chassis. 
    Your analysis above, which was pretty good, left out the chipset, which you always have to think about when assessing upgrade possibilities:
    http://www.cpu-upgrade.com/mb-Intel_%28chipsets%29/HM65_Express.html
    The HM65 does support a couple 3rd gen CPUs but none of them is on HP's list for your model. You could try one of the ones listed in the link I gave but I think there is a very small chance they will work.
    If this is "the Answer" please click "Accept as Solution" to help others find it. 

  • 2014 Mac mini doesn't scale the entire HP Envy 32 monitor screen

    I recently purchased a HP Envy 32 monitor for use with my 2014 Mac mini with the Iris display. I get 2560x1440 resolution at 60 Hz on both the DP (1.2) as well as the HDMI ports (using the auto-detected HP Envy 32 color profile) but the display doesn't scale the entire screen of the monitor. Is anyone else using this configuration successfully? If so, what have you done to make full use of the 32" monitor real-estate? I simply cannot find any options in Display preferences (Yosemite) to change underscan options or for that matter within the monitor itself. Is there a particular display profile or driver I can use to fix this issue?

    I'm using a 4K compatible DP cable connected to the Thunderbolt port and getting to the max resolution of the monitor. So I don't think the issue lies there. I was able to use SwitchResX trial mode to discover an underscan option that allowed me to scale to the entire monitor screen. Assuming SwitchResX is manipulating core OSX functions, I'd assume there is some display related configuration within OSX that I should be able to tweak in order to scale the monitor screen natively in OSX without requiring any 3rd party software. Any thoughts for how to go about tweaking the display natively?
    Thanks

  • Comparison of Yoga 11s in Intel Core i5-4210Y and i5-3339Y variations (ie. Ivy Bridge vs Haswell)

    Hello. hope I can get some opinions and facts in the above comparison.
    I have a Haswell but I may have some permanent issues with it. The 11s in general doesn't seem widely available but Tiger Direct has an Ivy Bridge version list as a refurbished product.
    Any ideas on what the differences are between these two editions?
    Are the other specs the same? (full size HDMI, full size SD card etc?)
    Thanks!

    hawkeye62 wrote:
    Mike416 wrote:
    Hello. hope I can get some opinions and facts in the above comparison.
    I have a Haswell but I may have some permanent issues with it. The 11s in general doesn't seem widely available but Tiger Direct has an Ivy Bridge version list as a refurbished product.
    Any ideas on what the differences are between these two editions?
    Are the other specs the same? (full size HDMI, full size SD card etc?)
    Thanks!
    As far as I know, everything is the same except for the Haswell processor. Which means you will probably get about an hour more battery life.
    Good luck, Jim
    And I forgot, the Best Buy Haswell model comes with Windows 8.1, so no win 8 to 8.1 upgrade needed.
    Jim

  • Hello i buy  a new macbook air white i5 ivy bridge processor and when i play a game the cpu themperature is 88-100 c its normal?

    Hello i buy  a new macbook air white i5 ivy bridge processor and when i play a game the cpu themperature is 88-100c it is normal?

    One thing I should add. While "normal", it doesn't make it preferrrable that you should be always running near the maximum capability of the unit. The new 2012 MBA's are outfitted with CPU's that have a maximum running temp of 115 degrees C. (the 2011's were rated at 100 degrees C.)
    At, or near this point, the CPU will shut down the system to safeguard from overheating. Right under this point the system's fan will be running at top speed. Any mechanical device, run at or near it's capability will undergo accelerated wear. Just how much in this situation is unknown. as such, I don't use my MBA as a full-time gaming rig. I try and keep it sensible.
    The MBA is not really designed for gaming, but it's competent performance sometimes lures us to use it as such.

  • Upgrade HP p7-1110 to Ivy Bridge CPU (Pentium G2030)

    Hello, everyone.
    Would someone please tell me if I can replace the CPU of HP P7-1110 with an ivy-bridge Pentium G2030?
    The motherboard is known as IPISB-CU (Carmel2).
    Thank you for your help.
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    MSU1, welcome to the forum.
    Here are the processor upgrades supported by the motherboard:
    Socket type: LGA 1155
    Motherboard supports the following processor upgrades:
    Processor                                                                TDP
    Core i7-2600 (Sandy Bridge) quad core
    95W
    Core i7-2600s (Sandy Bridge) quad core
    65W
    Core i5-2500 (Sandy Bridge) quad core
    95W
    Core i5-2500s (Sandy Bridge) quad core
    65W
    Core i5-2500t (Sandy Bridge) quad core
    45W
    Core i5-2400 (Sandy Bridge) quad core
    95W
    Core i5-2400s (Sandy Bridge) quad core
    65W
    Core i5-2390t (Sandy Bridge) quad core
    35W
    Core i5-2300 (Sandy Bridge) quad core
    95W
    Core i3-2120 (Sandy Bridge) dual core
    65W
    Core i3-2100 (Sandy Bridge) dual core
    65W
    Core i3-2100t (Sandy Bridge) dual core
    35W
    Any of these should work fine with your system.  However, if you decide to do further upgrades, it will probably require a power supply unit (PSU) upgrade, as well.  The existing PSU is only 250W.
    Please click the "Thumbs Up+ button" if I have helped you and click "Accept as Solution" if your problem is solved.
    Signature:
    HP TouchPad - 1.2 GHz; 1 GB memory; 32 GB storage; WebOS/CyanogenMod 11(Kit Kat)
    HP 10 Plus; Android-Kit Kat; 1.0 GHz Allwinner A31 ARM Cortex A7 Quad Core Processor ; 2GB RAM Memory Long: 2 GB DDR3L SDRAM (1600MHz); 16GB disable eMMC 16GB v4.51
    HP Omen; i7-4710QH; 8 GB memory; 256 GB San Disk SSD; Win 8.1
    HP Photosmart 7520 AIO
    ++++++++++++++++++
    **Click the Thumbs Up+ to say 'Thanks' and the 'Accept as Solution' if I have solved your problem.**
    Intelligence is God given; Wisdom is the sum of our mistakes!
    I am not an HP employee.

  • Z68MA-ED55 ivy bridge??

    short question with simple answer i brought!! when or even will be bios update for this motherboard for ivy bridge support?? i need to know fast as i am buying either i5 2500k,or i5 3570k!! and the guy who will bring me  CPU is coming to my country in short time!!! thanks in advance!!

    your board is a B3 version (sandybridge capable) there doesn't seem to be any news from msi of adding Ivybridge support to that platform! they seem to be focusing on G3 version boards for that processor support
    http://event.msi.com/mb/22nm/

  • C30 Intel E5-2600 Family Ivy-Bridge Upgrade

    I bought a Lenovo C30 109738U in September 2012 with an E5-2620 (Sandy-Bridge) original CPU.  At the time of purchase I upgraded the CPU to 2xE5-2620 (Sandy-Bridge).
    Because the E5-2620 only runs at 2.0GHz I have been thinking about upgrading the processor for a while.  I have decided that 1xE5-2690 is probably my best bet.
    I know that my Lenovo C30 Motherboard is C602 Socket-R LGA-2011.  I also know that my C30 supports the replacement CPU E5-2690 (Sandy-Bridge) because this replacement CPU has FRU number 03T8369 for the C30.
    The thing is that the Intel E5-2690 V2 (Ivy-Bridge) is scheduled for release 2013 Q3 (this quarter), and it is supposed to also fit the LGA-2011 socket.  I am not clear on what other compatibility issues there are here, and I would like to know more about this.
    What are the full compatibility issues?
    Any guess as to when the E5-2690 V2 (Ivy-Bridge) will actually come out?
    Please feel free to elaborate if you know something about this issue.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hello psturtle:
    Glad you are following this.
    First I will clearly layout my initial C30 config and upgrade path:
    INITIAL CONFIG: Bought C30 1097-38U off shelf from registered Lenovo Dealer (Sept 2012).
    Original Specs:  C30, 1xE5-2620, 4GB DDR3 1333MHz RAM, Win7 64 Pro, 500GB 7200 rpm HDD Bay1 (non-raid), Quadro 2000D.
    IMMEDIATE UPGRADES (Sept 2012):
    1) Increased to 2xE5-2620 with second chip from Intel.  C30 standard second chip heat sink from Lenovo was installed.  The extra Intel heat sink supplied with second Intel chip was discarded (it was designed for a single chip installation).
    2) Increased RAM to 40GB (8+8+8+8+4+4) DDR3 1333MHz channelled symmetrically to each chip.
    3) Replaced drive C:\ with Intel 520 480GB SSD.  Note AHCI could not be implemented because Win7 Pro 64 had already been re-installed (plus software) when we found out about AHCI (from you).  But the SSD on this C30 is working well.  We did get AHCI done before re-installing Win7 64 Pro on another machine (Lenovo W530) with an Intel 520 480 GB SSD in January 2013.  It is better with AHCI, but I would say not having AHCI is not supercritical.  Having the SSD is the main thing.  It is worth mentioning that the C30 at only 2.0GHz (E5-2620) performed very poorly with the conventional 500GB 7200 rpm HDD supplied.  I have attributed this to the weight of Win7 64 Pro relative to XP 32-bit.  However, the 500GB 7200 rpm HDD now resides in Bay2 (non-raid) as drive D:\ and is working well as a storage drive.
    4) There have been no further upgrades to my C30, nor have there been any problems.
    To answer your next question more clearly, let me explain a bit.  I am in Scientific Computation, and 2xE5-2620 has been wonderful for parallel jobs.  If the job can be run in parallel, I can beat an i7-3770 by a wide margin.  However, if the job needs to be sequential, then the i7-3770 will win by a wide margin.
    So I have been thinking for a while that 1xE5-2690 would be a better configuration.  My Lenovo Dealer has been slow to move on this, partly because he is worried about CPU heat.  However, you appear to have clarified that the standard C30 CPU1 Heatsink will be sufficient for the 135W E5-2690.  This is good news.  Do you think we should buy a new C30 CPU1 Heatsink(fan) along with a new Intel E5-2690 chip?
    I have become aware that the E5-2687W at 150W burns too hot for the C30 and is not supported.  Thank you for clarifying this point.  We would be happier with the E5-2690 anyway, and many sources say the 2690 is the better chip.  So the E5-2687W is off our agenda.
    We understand that you cannot really say anything about it right now, but we are in the predicament that the E5-2690 V2 (Ivy-Bridge) is soon to be launched (at last).  This is an unusual launch since, according to some sources, Intel intends to make this launch backward compatible.  That is, my current C30 motherboard is expected to be able to support the E5-2690 V2.  My Lenovo Dealer and I are not sure if we should wait.
    In any case, suppose we go with the current 1xE5-2690.  As far as the RAM is concerned, we know that it would need to be reconfigured to a single chip setting.  However, we would probably also consider replacing the RAM with 4x16GB DDR3 1600MHz since the 2690 supports this and the 2620 does not.
    Note, we are fully aware than any double chip installation has to be comprised of two identical chips.  We would most likely sell the 2xE5-2620 on the used market along with the old 1333MHz RAM.

  • Overclocked Ivy Bridge 3750k

    So I have my 3750k overclocked and it works just fine in Windows, but when I try to run it in Arch. I've tried both cpufrequtils and cpupower. I've tried loading the modules for each one, but it will never go over 3.4 ghz no matter what. I'm i7z for monitoring the frequencies and mprime or linpack for stress testing. both cpufrequtils and cpupower give this error
    no or unknown cpufreq driver is active on this CPU
    is ivy bridge just not supported yet? it keeps refering to my cpu as a nehalem cpu when it isn't. Any ideas?

    @risho -
    1) Your /etc/rc.conf is out-of-date, see: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Be … tion_files for more.  See below what a standard rc.conf looks like today.
    2) No need to define the min/max in /etc/conf.d/cpupower as the software do not yet understand turbo mode
    3) See the output of my commands below for your reference
    4) The jumping between values for linpack is normal.  You need to use a script to query lm_sensors at regular intervals then look at the geometric mean of the temps per core to get an accurate picture of temps.  Looking at them at any given instant is not very descriptive.  See my post here for more and for some code.
    $ sudo cpupower info
    System's multi core scheduler setting: not supported
    System's thread sibling scheduler setting: not supported
    analyzing CPU 0:
    Could not read perf-bias value
    My chip is running 45x100=4.5 GHz but again, cpupower can't handle turbo:
    $ sudo cpupower frequency-info
    analyzing CPU 0:
    driver: acpi-cpufreq
    CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
    CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0
    maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
    hardware limits: 1.60 GHz - 3.50 GHz
    available frequency steps: 3.50 GHz, 3.50 GHz, 3.40 GHz, 3.20 GHz, 3.10 GHz, 3.00 GHz, 2.80 GHz, 2.70 GHz, 2.50 GHz, 2.40 GHz, 2.30 GHz, 2.10 GHz, 2.00 GHz, 1.90 GHz, 1.70 GHz, 1.60 GHz
    available cpufreq governors: ondemand, performance
    current policy: frequency should be within 1.60 GHz and 3.50 GHz.
    The governor "ondemand" may decide which speed to use
    within this range.
    current CPU frequency is 1.60 GHz (asserted by call to hardware).
    boost state support:
    Supported: yes
    Active: yes
    If you want an accurate result, use community/i7z.
    $ cat /scratch/chroot64/root/etc/rc.conf
    # /etc/rc.conf - configuration file for initscripts
    # Most of rc.conf has been replaced by various other configuration
    # files. See archlinux(7) for details.
    # For more details on rc.conf see rc.conf(5).
    DAEMONS=(syslog-ng network crond)
    # Storage
    # USEDMRAID="no"
    # USELVM="no"
    # Network
    # interface=
    # address=
    # netmask=
    # gateway=
    Last edited by graysky (2012-08-05 09:35:35)

  • Buying Z77MA-G45 with an Ivy Bridge CPU

    Hi
    I would like to buy Z77MA-G45 with Ivy Bridge CPU. It isn't supported by default BIOS (1.1), and I don't really have any possibility to upgrade BIOS with a supported CPU (yes, I've read the topic).
    So now questions:
    - is Z77MA-G45 runnable with Ivy Bridge just to get to BIOS and update from an USB drive on in a similar way?
    - is there any marking on mobos' box that could indicate the BIOS loaded (the BIOS version itself, lot number, serial number, something similar?)
    TIA

    Quote from: Warner on 16-May-12, 00:53:07
    Hello TIA,
    The board will handle all Ivy Bridge CPUs without any issues regardless the BIOS version shown on the CPU support list.
    However, it is highly recommended that you perform BIOS update to the latest version once the system is up and running for best result.
    Sincerely,
    Warner
    Warner without trying to hijack the thread woudl that also apply to Z77A-GD65?
    Thanks

  • Restore Ivy Bridge to Sandy Bridge MSI Z68A-GD55 G3

    Hi,
    I made the mistake that upgrade my BIOS to Ivy Bridge compatible one and I lost my all OC control over my motherboard. When I tried to back to version 23.7 BIOS that in the link http://msi.com/product/mb/Z68AGD55_G3.html#/?div=BIOS , I get the following error "rom file romid is not compatible with existing bios" with MSI Forum HQ USB Flashing Tool. Please help me, how can i go back to Sandy Bridge bios?

    Quote from: Svet on 26-April-14, 18:33:22
    it will help to flash back to the wanted bios
    Sorry but I can't say I understand what you are saying :(

Maybe you are looking for