[solved] "monospace" font displayed as some other font

For some reason (that I am unable to figure out for myself), the "monospace" font on my system is not displayed as such, but replaced by some other font, presumably* by the last one installed to the system. See this screenshot of uzbl-browser as an example; leafpad's font-selection dialog would be another.
* A while back (don't remember when) "monospace" started being displayed as some pleasant sans-serif font, which I did not investigate. When I installed some blackletter fonts (ttf-unifraktur) recently, it started being displayed as one of them, which is more of a nuisance, see screenshot.)
What could be going on here? What is the "monospace" font anyway?
Last edited by Franek (2014-02-27 20:54:20)

First: I probably should have mentioned that I am using the infinality-bundle and infinality-bundle-fonts repositories.
(Re-)Installing ttf-dejavu instantly made uzbl pretty again. But actually, I did not have ttf-dejavu installed in the first place, but t1-dejavu-ib from the infinality-bundle-fonts repository. When I change back to t1-dejavu-ib, Monospace is displayed as a blackletter font again.
Here is the output of "fc-match monospace" with ttf-dejavu installed:
$ fc-match monospace
DejaVuSansMono.ttf: "DejaVu Sans Mono" "Book"
And here it is with t1-dejavu-ib:
$ fc-match monospace
sawarabi-gothic-medium.ttf: "Sawarabi Gothic" "Medium"
About this font (which is certainly not the blackletter font I am seeing in uzbl):
$ pacman -Qs sawarabi
local/ttf-sawarabi-ib 0.0045-2 (infinality-bundle-fonts)
Sawarabi font family for Japanese script.
I have nothing in ~/.config/fontconfig, whereas /etc/fonts/conf.d/ is filled with several symlinks, most of which belong to the fontconfig-infinality-ultimate package. They all look alright to me, or rather: I trust that the infinality-bundle(-fonts) packages are doing the right thing. (Should I ask bohoomil about this?) Here is a list:
$ pacman -Qo /etc/fonts/conf.d/*
/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-base-rendering.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/10-scale-bitmap-fonts.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/30-metric-aliases.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/31-fix-cantarell.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/35-repl-custom.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/40-non-latin.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/42-luxi-mono.conf is owned by font-bh-ttf 1.0.3-1
/etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/49-sansserif.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/51-local.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-ttf-noto-sans-ui.conf is owned by ttf-noto-sans-multilang-ib 1.04-2
/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-ttf-noto-sans.conf is owned by ttf-noto-sans-multilang-ib 1.04-2
/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-ttf-noto-serif.conf is owned by ttf-noto-serif-multilang-ib 1.04-2
/etc/fonts/conf.d/68-override.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/82-no-embedded-bitmaps.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/82-no-force-autohint.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/82-no-ttf-as-bitmap.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/83-yes-bitmaps.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/83-yes-postscript.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/88-forced-synthetic.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/90-dejavu-t1.conf is owned by t1-dejavu-ib 2.34-4
/etc/fonts/conf.d/90-non-tt-fonts.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/90-opensans-t1.conf is owned by t1-opensans-ib 1.2-7
/etc/fonts/conf.d/90-tt-fonts.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/92-selective-rendering.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/93-final-rendering.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/94-no-synthetic.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/95-reject.conf is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15
/etc/fonts/conf.d/99pdftoopvp.conf is owned by cups-filters 1.0.46-1
/etc/fonts/conf.d/README is owned by fontconfig-infinality-ultimate 2.11.0-15

Similar Messages

  • Logo displaying in productin but not displaying in some other user

    Hello experts,
    I developed payment advice sheet using scripts and transported to production successfully.In production also the output is dispalying correct but some other user (clnt uses different user in that only logo is not displaying) remaining output is correct.
    But only logo is not displaying.But in production logo is displaying.What is the problem?
    please help me in this?

    Please clarify your posting...
    In production, the logo displays correctly for all but one user?
    Or, did you mean that in the production instance, the logo is correct, but in other SAP instance(s), such as training, etc., the logo does not appear? 
    If the second case, check to see that transport completed in all target instances.
    If the first case, sorry, no ideas about what would cause that.

  • [SOLVED] Bold monospace fonts and rendering

    Hi everybody,
    I chose to use the Inconsolata font (http://www.levien.com/type/myfonts/inconsolata.html) everywhere I need a monospace font.
    However I have an issue with this setup. Since Inconsolata font doesn't have a bold variant, when "bolding" it, it gets rendered with a different width (it's not monospace anymore)
    This happens, for example, inside an Eclipse editor or even in gEdit.
    I've also noticed that in some applications (e.g., gnome-terminal or x-chat), bold is correctly displayed using the same width of the normal variant.
    I've read the https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Font_Configuration page and, in particular, the "disable autohinter for bold fonts". I actually don't use the auto-hinter so I tried different configuration but without luck.
    Does anyone have an hint for solving this inconsistency?
    Thanks.
    P.S.: To better understand what I am talking about you can have a look at this image: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/85 … olata.png/
    Last edited by fm (2012-01-14 21:41:36)

    brebs wrote:
    fm wrote:I actually don't use the auto-hinter so I tried different configuration but without luck.
    If the app doesn't use fontconfig, then changing fontconfig settings won't help
    That's clear. But gnome-terminal and gEdit aren't they supposed to use the same backend, i.e., fontconfig?
    Because gnome-terminal works fine. gEdit doesn't.
    Thanks.

  • On my MacBook Pro, sometimes when I click to close tabs in Safari the button will not work.  I have to click on some other part of the screen and then it will.  This happens in other programs like Word/Excel for changing font, etc. Solution/Suggestions?

    On my MacBook Pro, sometimes when I click to close tabs in Safari the button will not work.  I have to click on some other part of the screen and then it will.  This happens in other programs like Word/Excel for changing font, etc. Solution/Suggestions?

    Start up in Safe Mode.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/PH4373

  • Cyrillic font in google and some other sites like Wikipedia are looking different in Win XP and Win 7

    Good day, gents.
    Yesterday I installed 4 beta on my desktop after succesfull using it on laptop. But when i opened google (and some other sites) i found that fonts are looking different with the same settings. Here screens:
    http://i52.tinypic.com/33x78eb.jpg - Laptop, Win XP Professional SP3 (Looks good)
    http://i56.tinypic.com/5nw47l.jpg - Desktop, Win 7 Ultimate (Looks terrible, those Times New Roman makes me mad)
    I tried reinstall, clearing cashe. In Firefox 3.6.9 on Desktop fonts was normal.
    How to resolve this ? Thanks and sorry for my English.

    Disable (remove the check-mark) in<br />
    Tools > Options > Advanced : General: Browsing: "Use hardware acceleration when available"
    See also this mozillaZine Forums threwad.
    Direct2D & DirectWrite HW Acceleration For Minefield - Info: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1775755

  • Why are all of my monospaced fonts suddenly so thin?

    Yesterday I noticed that suddenly all of my monospaced fonts are completely messed up. Here's a about week old screenshot for comparison
    This is how it looked before
    And now
    These are both from TextMate using Monaco 14, but the same issue happens with Menlo. I also tried to download Bistream Vera Sans Mono and it also looks pretty ugly.
    This started happening to me yesterday and I actually reformatted the whole drive (not because of this), reinstalled Snow Leopard, upgraded back to Lion, didn't restore any backups and the fonts still look ugly.
    I would understand if this started happening only after the reinstall, because that would mean I had some specific settings. But it started happening out of nowhere and persisted after clean reinstall of OS X Lion.
    At one point I actually had some applications displaying the font correctly until I restarted them.
    These examples are before I reinstalled Lion.
    This is Xcode after restarting it
    and the same code from terminal VIM, which I haven't turned off yet
    these two were actually taken at the same time, both using the same font. But once I restarted the terminal, it started displaying it in the same messed up way.
    Some people suggested the font smoothing in System Preferences, but I have that turned on

    I managed to solve this with
    defaults -currentHost write -globalDomain AppleFontSmoothing -int 2
    more specific information can be found here

  • Issue about monospace font in Chromium

    I don't know why some of the monospace font in Chromium show strangely.
    But most of the font is OK. I have tried to modify some configuration in /etc/font/conf.d/*
    I failed because I am not familiar with the font configuration. Is there anyone
    can give me some advice on the font config? This troubles me a lot and
    I have spent so much time to resolve it. Thank you!
    I know why... From the CSS of this field, I see this:
    .wp-editor-area {
        font-family: Consolas,Monaco,monospace;
    And I delete Consolas, nothing happened with the font. But I delete Monaco, it look fine.
    The font appears like the monospace I set before. It seems that the ttf-monaco affects
    this font. How can I configure ttf-monaco? Or I can only remove ttf-monaco to solve the problem.
    Last edited by mssun (2013-04-06 14:36:35)

    I have read this wiki, but no matter what I modified. It seems that it only affected other fonts except some certain web pages. I don't know why.
    I have suspected whether 53-monospace-lcd-filter.conf make it. But I modified this file, nothing happened. That's why I come here to find help.
    [EDIT] I tried to change the fixed-width font in chromium, but nothing happened with the font in that field.
    Last edited by mssun (2013-04-06 14:27:23)

  • Identify Monospaced Fonts

    Hello sir, friends, madam,
    I want to identify System fonts which are monospaced. I then have to display the names of such fonts in combo box. I got the list of all system fonts installed on machine using the folloing code.
    java.awt.GraphicsEnvironment.getAvailableFontFamilyNames() java.awt.GraphicsEnvironment.getAllFonts()
    Now I need to check which of them are monospaced. For this I tried doing the following Font.getAttributes(). This method returns a Map contains TextAttributes as key. So I used TextAttribute.FAMILY as a key to retrive the value from the map. But then I am getting other fonts as well, apart from monospaced fonts.
    Can anybody suggests whether I am on right track or can anyone provide some alternative to that I can reach the solution ?
    Waiting for your replies.
    Thanks and Regards
    Rohit.

    I've never heard of a good way to do this. There don't seem to be any relevant attributes or flags embedded in the fonts themselves, which seems strange, considering how important that property is. The only sure way that I can see would be to create a Font object for each installed font and compare the width of the letter 'i' to that of the the letter 'W' (or equivalents for whatever language you're targetting). You could cache the results, so you wouldn't have to do that every time the font dialog is displayed, but it's still pretty ugly.
    Here's a more hackish, but faster approach I found in the l2fprod commons project protected boolean isMonospaced(String fontFamily) {
        String lower = fontFamily.toLowerCase();
        return lower.indexOf("fixed") >= 0 || lower.indexOf("monospaced") >= 0
          || lower.indexOf("profont") >= 0 || lower.indexOf("console") >= 0
          || lower.indexOf("typewriter") >= 0;
      }The method can stand a lot of improvement (as written, it fails to spot these fonts from my system: "Andale Mono", "Bitstream Vera Sans Mono", "Courier", "Courier New", "DejaVu Sans Mono", "Monaco", and "Monospace 821"), and it would need to be updated every time a new monospaced font comes out, but it still seems like the less painful option to me.

  • Monospace Font question

    I am somewhat new to Oracle forms, i am using 10G so don't shoot me if these are dumb questions.
    I want to left align my Prompts on my form but using Tahoma or Verdana the alignment is always off. I fixed it by using a monospace font like Courier but is there a way to get these other more standard fonts to left align properly? (i don't want to right align them)
    Courier is not very readable and for the internet most people use Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif.
    My other question is that if i use a font that is listed in the Oracle Forms Developer will it automatically download them to clients that don't have that font? How does Oracle handle this?

    No question is a dumb question. :-)
    To left align prompts, you go to the canvas and select the several that you want to align. Then all you do is click the 'Align Left' icon on the editing toolbar at the top of the canvas (or use pull-down Arange, Align Objects, Horizontally-Align Left). If the web display is not left-aligned, you may also need to open the property palette on the items with the prompts, and set the Prompt Alignment property to Start. You should NOT need to fuss with a monospaced font once you do this.
    I don't think Forms downloads fonts. Instead there is a font translation process where a font that is similar is selected.
    Just a note... I don't use Forms 9i or 10g, only 6i (both c/s and web), so my answer may not be right on.

  • How to monospace fonts in Illustrator?

    I can't seem to find this feature - is it possible to do this in Illustrator?
    Thanks in advance!

    Good responses here, but I just wanted to add in one other solution. This is painstaking but I'm having to do it for a project. I literally need a grid of text. I'd much rather just have a monospace font. Illustrator, if you're listening, a "Force Monospace" option would be excellent for UI designers, puzzle designers, and a lot of other people. People go to illustrator to do the odd jobs that other programs can't do. This feature would be at home here.
    The basic idea is to use linked text boxes and flowing text. This will be much easier to do in InDesign, since that program was born to flow text. I find it hard to click the flow button in CS5 and you can't hold option to continue the linkage process like you can in InDesign.
    Anyways, details on how to do this below. If you absolutely need a monospace layout of text glyphs, and don't have a monospace font to work with, and need to work in illustrator, this should work. I'm not saying that it will look good or be legible, and I guarantee you'll curse Illustrator because this would be very easy for them to add in as a feature.
    1) Click and drag out a rectangular text box. Don't just click and start typing, you need an actual type box.
    2) Enter your text and style your text how you want it.  Use the increased tracking method, posted above, if you want to see  roughly what it will look like.
    3) Decrease the tracking so it's 0 after you have everything styled.
    4) Add an uppercase M to the beginning of your text. That's typically (no pun intended) the widest character in most fonts.
    5) Resize the text box width so all you can see is that first M. You can make it a little wider just to be safe.
    6) Drag out a copy of that text box, and delete the text from the new one.
    7) Drag out copies of this empty text box. They should "flow" from left to right for English or other left-to-right languages. You should have as many boxes as you have letter in your final text.
    8) Link the text boxes: first click on your text box that has your placeholder text. You should see a red overflow [+] sign on the right side of the box. Click that.
    9) Click the edges of the next text box and you should see text flow from one box to the next.
    10) Rinse and repeat until all your boxes are filled. As you're doing this, you'll have multiple smaller letters filling up smaller boxes. There are two way to solve this:
    11A) Hit enter after each character to force the text to the next text box. This is cumbersome.
    11B) Increase tracking to a very high number or something that will prohibit two characters from occupying the same box. This is good if you are going to want to edit the type after the fact.
    12) Horizontally align your boxes, center your text, and you're done.

  • Report displaying junk characters or Greek or some other language

    Hi All,
    I have one Custom report in PDF. It is a simple tabular report. When I run this report from Report Builder, it runs fine but when I register it in Oracle Apps and run it from there, it displays all the characters in Greek or some other language or junk characters. Sometimes it works if I change font. But its a trial and error. I dont understand why is it happening. This has happened with one of my other reports too. It worked when I changed the font and its size. This time it didnt work. Any clue how can I fix this issue?
    Any lead will be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    CAH
    Edited by: user638181 on Sep 3, 2009 7:05 AM

    Hi Hussein,
    We have similiar issue with our custom PDF reports. We are in the process of upgrading from 11.5.9 to R12.
    All these reports work fine in 11.5.9.
    Following are the details of our R12 environment:
    1) What is the application release? Application release is 12.1.1
    2) What is application/database characterset? Database - 11.1.0.7.0 and characterset is UTF8.
    3) Is this a text or bitmap report? What is the report language? - It is a text report and Language is English
    4) Do you use PASTA for printing? - Yes we do
    5) Do you get the correct printout if you print the concurrent request output file from the OS? - If I run the report from report builder directly, Yes. If from Oracle Apps, no.
    6) Expected output: "Days in Queue"
    Actual Output: when I copy and paste the output here it is showing correct. But on the report it is showing
    something like ∆Ωµ.....
    7) If I try changing the font, it works
    8) A different text field on the same report with the same font shows good.
    I would appreciate your help on this one.
    Thanks
    Vishnu

  • [SOLVED] urxvt doesn't display correctly some special characters

    Hello everyone,
    I have a weird issue with urxvt. For some reason it doesn't display correctly some special character.
    Here is a comparison between xfce4-terminal and rxvt-unicode  (I used theses characters as exemple):
    xfce4-terminal :
    urxvt :
    And here is my .XDefaults file (without the color and the plugin part, since it's unrelevant):
    !Font
    URxvt.font: xft:PragmataPro:pixelsize=11:antialias=false
    !General
    URxvt.scrollBar: false
    URxvt*imLocale: fr_CH.UTF-8
    URxvt.saveLines: 5000
    URxvt.geometry: 95x26+50+50
    Has someone an idea what the problem could be?
    Thank's in advance.
    Last edited by mwm (2013-11-13 13:15:48)

    This is what I think is happpening.
    PragmataPro may not contain those glyphs.  It appears to have a wide array of glyphs but it is not unicode complete.
    Xfce-terminal is a vte terminal.  When a glyph cannot be found in the desired font, it will find the glyph in the 'closest' font.  Urxvt will only use the glyphs in the font or fonts specified.  If PragmataPro does not contain the glyphs, urxvt will display boxes.
    You can give urxvt a series of fonts to search. It will search for a glyph through the listed fonts in the order you specify.  Here's an example from my urxvt configs:
    urxvt*font: xft:DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Book:antialias=false:size=8, \
    xft:WenQuanYi Bitmap Song:size=8, \
    xft:FreeSerif:style=Regular, \
    xft:unifont:style=Medium:antialias=false
    I couldn't use FreeSerif or unifont as a main font, but for an occasional glyph, it works for me.  This file, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/exam … 8-demo.txt, can be displayed in urxvt correctly, with only a few unknow glyphs showing as boxes in the Amharic section.

  • Reading email in a monospaced font, is that possible?

    Hello all,
    I would like to be able to read formatted text, like small tables, on my iPhone... Of course I will need a monospaced font to do so... Is there a way to change the current font into Monaco or Courier?
    Kind regards,
    Adam

    Thanks Kevin,
    Of course it's not 'my email' but the sender's email that needed to be sent in rich text, courier new 8-)
    Will try to get that arranged...
    Thanks for your reply! Still hope 'plain text' will be possible some day...
    Kind regards,
    Adam

  • [SOLVED] Odd font spacing in gnome-terminal

    Hi guys, i'm new to Arch and i'm loving it: everything is working flawlessly apart from monospaced fonts that look more spaced than what i'm used to (Ubuntu), here is what i'm talking about:
    I tried -lcd and -ubuntu packages, changed hintstyle to both full/medium/slight but all to no avail, do you have any ideas?
    Here is my configuration, that i'm using in Ubuntu and Arch right now:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
    <fontconfig>
    <match target="font">
    <edit name="autohint" mode="assign"><bool>false</bool></edit>
    <edit name="antialias" mode="assign"><bool>true</bool></edit>
    <edit name="hinting" mode="assign"><bool>true</bool></edit>
    <edit name="hintstyle" mode="assign"><const>hintslight</const></edit>
    <edit name="lcdfilter" mode="assign"><const>lcddefault</const></edit>
    <edit name="rgba" mode="assign"><const>rgb</const></edit>
    </match>
    </fontconfig>
    Thank you in advance!
    <edit>
    Some clarifications: the configuration does get applied, so it's not due to misplaced configuration files, the font tracking just doesn't look right.
    The depicted font in the screenshots is Menlo, but any other monospaced font, such as the Droid Mono, will look wrongly spaced.
    </edit>
    Last edited by bmanuel (2011-11-06 11:12:45)

    Oh well, it seems i got it: it seems that just selecting a size of 7.5 instead of 8 get exactly the same spacing as if using a size of 8 in Ubuntu, this without installing any -ubuntu/-lcd/-cleartype patches, only vanilla arch packages.
    The dumb gnome-3 new font selector will *not* permit selecting intermediate sizes and won't let you enter "7.5", so fire up gconf-editor and just change the value for apps.gnome-terminal.profiles.Default to be, as in my case, "Menlo 7.5".
    Finally, sensible spacing in my terminals!

  • [SOLVED] QT fonts corrupted?

    I'm having some problems with my fonts in QT, see screenshot for example.
    Any idea as to what could be wrong, and how I would fix it?
    Last edited by SamC (2009-04-06 23:07:41)

    @SamC If you have a LCD with vrgb than at the moment stepping back to qt 4.4.x would be the better solution. See here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13977
    If not, than playing with the "antialiasing" and "sub-pixel rendering" settings of fontconfig (/etc/fonts/conf.d or ~/.fonts.conf) could solve it. Good luck.

Maybe you are looking for