[SOLVED] pacman update fails: gcc requires gcc-libs=4.7.0-3

Question

Hi
I ran pacman -Syu this morning and there's an update to pacman to install first, so I say yes but it fails like this:
:: Synchronising package databases...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
:: The following packages should be upgraded first :
pacman
:: Do you want to cancel the current operation
:: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n] y
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: gcc: requires gcc-libs=4.7.0-3
But I have gcc-libs 4.7.0-3 installed:
pacman -Qs gcc-libs
local/gcc-libs 4.7.0-3 (base)
Runtime libraries shipped by GCC
So what's going on?
Last edited by useradded (2012-04-11 08:08:09)

Answer 1

How might that break pacman? Assuming databases are current, is running
pacman -S pacman
followed by
pacman -Syu
different from what pacman itself is trying to do?
Is the message that pacman should be updated first just wrong?
So is this what you should do?
$ pacman -Syu
Recent ML chatter: linux(2)
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core 101.8 KiB 480K/s 00:00 [########################################] 100%
extra 1385.2 KiB 832K/s 00:02 [########################################] 100%
community 1636.1 KiB 810K/s 00:02 [########################################] 100%
multilib 86.4 KiB 522K/s 00:00 [########################################] 100%
:: The following packages should be upgraded first :
pacman
:: Do you want to cancel the current operation
:: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n] y
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
:: gcc-libs and gcc-libs-multilib are in conflict. Remove gcc-libs-multilib? [y/N] y
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: gcc-multilib: requires gcc-libs-multilib=4.7.0-3
No pacnew files to update.
$ pacman -Syu
:: The following packages should be upgraded first :
pacman
:: Do you want to cancel the current operation
:: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n] N
I thought that itself might break pacman, which is why I updated pacman on its own. So I obviously don't get how it works...
Plus, why did you say "Or, just..." which suggests it is an alternative method rather than a better one...?
Last edited by cfr (2012-04-11 22:49:15)