Sorry, let me clarity...(DNG 8, XP, CS2)

After re-reading the DNG 8 page, it will work with XP. I didn't realize it was a seperate app. Ihave CS2 with camera raw 3, which is a plug in.
Sorry about my confusion (old age).
Do I need to remove my camera raw plug in??

Sorry, I have been away from any computer for a week. I was visiting family and having too much fun to even touch a computer. You need to have Camera Raw 3.7 installed. That was the last version that was compatible with Photoshop CS2. After you convert your images to DNG you still have to have Camera Raw to open those files prior to opening them in Photoshop. But don't try to install any newer versions because they simply will not work with your version of Photoshop.

Similar Messages

.CR2 from canon G9 won't open with DNG converter or CS2

Hi I've tried opening .CR2 raw files fro a new Canon G9 with Adobe DNG converter but message says 'files won't open problem with parsing the file'
I downloaded both Camera raw 3.7 and 4.2 to use in CS2 but can't open them there either. Does anyone have any advice?
Malci

Canon G9 RAW files will only be able to convert in the latest (and free) ACR 4.3 but ACR version 4.x only works in PSCS3
for CS2 the max version is ACR3.7.
You have 2 options left:
1- upgrade your version to CS3, apart from being able to directly open the RAW in ACR you will benefit from a lot more options in ACR4 and CS3 that are worth the money.
2- use the DNG route, download the (free) DNG converter version 4.3 from the Adobe site.
convert the G9 RAW files to DNG and then open the files in the ACR 3.7 converter in CS2

Jpg and DNG brightness problem - CS2!

I am using CS2 with camera raw plug-in 3.7
I am running Windows XP SP3.
I open a DNG file. I do NOT do any processing whatsoever!
I just immediately save it as a JPG file at maximum quality.
However, when I view the two files with the Irfanview picture browser, the JPG seems to be washed out compared to the DNG!
Can anyone explain this?

[email protected] wrote:
> It does not pertain to camera raw, rather with Photoshop or color Management.
The underlying problem that many people have trouble coming to grips with is
variants of:
'Why does my RAW image look different from the
1) JPEG
2) in camera Preview
3) manufacturer's version
4) etc...?'.
The question is simple but the answer is not. The answer touches on color space,
white balance, default Camera RAW settings and processing, camera profiles,
etc... Many of the threads here go into really good depth in examining each of
these topics but I don't recall seeing anything that approaches a comprehensive
answer, especially since we now have the DNG Profile Editor.
-X

Help with DNG program for CS2

I have photoshop CS2- I downloaded Adobe DNG 3.7- I can not figure out how to convert my NEF files from my Nikon camera- Program has no instructions- I also downloaded a camera raw plug-in file. What's that? How do I get theses NEF files to Photoshop! HELP!
Thanks you!

"Why would I want to update when it says DNG 3.7 is what works with CS2?"
DNG Converter != Camera Raw. You are confusing the two.
You want Camera Raw 3.7 for use with CS2.
"My Nikon D40x is on the list of cameras in the 3.7 program, so what would be different?"
No, the D40x is NOT on the list of cameras supported by 3.7. Support was not added until Camera Raw 4.1 and DNG Converter 4.1.
You always want to use the most recent version of the DNG Converter, which is currently 4.3.1. Is is a stand alone program. It does not require any version of any Adobe software to be installed.

Converting Tiff to DNG

I use a Nikon slide scanner that produces tiff format files. I want to import them into Lightroom as DNG files. The Lightroom import function does not let you do this, as it only seems to let you do DNG conversions on Raw files. How do I get my tiff files to DNG format.
Sorry if this has been asked and answered, but I could not find any search function on this forum.

I had a similar problem. I had three Kodak pcd disks. I converted the 4MB pcd's to tiff using Easy graphic converter resulting in a 18MB tiff file and then to a dng. The dng's were 11 MB! To do the last conversion I had to do the last conversion in the same folder and then outside of lightroom delete the tiff's. Sincerely, Carey Robson <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected].. >I use a Nikon slide scanner that produces tiff format files. I want to >import them into Lightroom as DNG files. The Lightroom import function does >not let you do this, as it only seems to let you do DNG conversions on Raw >files. How do I get my tiff files to DNG format. > > Sorry if this has been asked and answered, but I could not find any search > function on this forum.

Upgrading from CS2 Suite (Win) to CS5 Suite (Mac)

Over the last few days I have twice called Adobe UK sales and have been assured that I can easily upgrade my Windows CS2 suite to a Mac CS5 suite.
I was told that all I have to do is enter the CS2 Windows serial number during the CS5 Mac installation and it will be accepted.
However I have found no mention of this anywhere on the internet.
Has anyone been given the same or conflicting advise by Adobe for this type of scenario?

Adobe are even contracdicting themselves re CS5 upgrades.
I was told by the UK sales team that I wouldn't need to submit a letter of software destruction upgrading from CS2 Windows to CS5 Mac.
However, the Adobe on-line representative said I would.
I can understand this requiurement for a straight platform swap of the same version.
However, if I am upgrading, I surely need a valid suite to upgrade from?
If I destroy my CS2 I will no longer have a valid suite any longer!
I have also found out that PhotoShop Mac CS5 will apparently no longer have the ability to print printer profiling targets with colour management disabled. Supposedly Adobe labs are developing a separate utility for printing profiling targets but with no ETA. This means that I will have to continue to use an earlier version of PhotoShop anyway!
With these uncertainties, contradictions and complications I have now cancelled my order.
Thanks again for your help.

Photoshop cs2 & intel-iMac

Ive been having issues w/my iMac.
I'm wondering if photoshop is causing system problems in my intel iMac.
I've seen several discussions and articles that the program was not prepared for the intel switch and is the root of many iMac issues.
Anyone know if it would do better installed on my external HD, or if it wouldn't make a difference?
Any similar experiences?
Any fixes?

Hello, DREAZ
~Bee pointed me to your post for my thoughts, so I will try to help, too. PhotoShop should work without causing problems on your iNtel Mac. Here are some ideas for your consideration.
(1) If you are working on huge (multiple-gigabyte) PhotoShop images (or launching CS2 by clicking on huge image files,) any computer will respond slower. However, if your saved file size is under a hundred megs, image size is not your problem. If you need to post back for more suggestions, let us know whether you launch CS2 by clicking on the application icon or on the icon for your image files.
(2) You should have sufficient RAM, but you do not tell us how much free space you have on your hard drive. Use File > Get Info on your startup drive and post back what fraction of disk space is "Available." You should try to keep at least several tens of GB free for best results when working on large PS file. I always keep more than 50GB free on my startup disk (that also holds my applications and PhotoShop image cache.)
(3) If you have multiple applications open while you are using CS2, quit everything, restart your Mac, and launch CS2 by itself to see whether your performance improves to an acceptable level. If you need to post back for more suggestions, time how long after you click the icon it takes for CS2 to launch and be ready to use after your restart. Post the answer back here.
(4) You can save your image files to your external drive, but installing CS2 on an external drive will not make it work better unless your startup disk has problems. Do you regularly perform Mac OS X routine maintenance?
( "Routine maintenance" means items a) , b) , and c) from
Travis A.- kmosx: Regular Maintenance / General Troubleshooting)
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=196761http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=196761
If you have not recently performed maintenance, do so now and see if you problem persists.
(5) Have you changed your PhotoShop "Plug-In & Scratch Disk" location or "Memory & Image Cache" usage Preferences? Improper settings for these preferences can adversely effect performance.
(6) Although I know of no specific problems with any third-party PhotoShop plug-ins, if you have installed any special PhotoShop add-on plug-ins, and if your problem persists after considering the other suggestions here, I suggest you check the plug-in developer's website or technical support to see whether there might be known issues with their software.
(7) If none of the above helps, we may be able to offer other suggestions based on your responses to the questions above.
Cheers,
Jim
Mac OS X (10.4.9) G5 DP 1.8 4.5GB RAM

Session Timeout Thoughts

I saw a post from awhile ago that you can't change the session timeout in iTunes U. Is this still true?
Our users are having timeout issues and we have an unfortunately lengthy login process to get back into iTunes U so I had some thoughts on the Site Login URL.
We use a portal to authenticate our users who then click an SSO link to take them to a jump page that assembles their credentials and generates an SSO link into iTunes U. I'd really like to avoid having to go back through the portal to get users back into iTunes.
What if, instead of passing just the destination back to the site login URL, iTunes U passed a full SSO link. This way, I can just point my site login URL to the jump page. The jump page can then parse the SSO link to verify the user's credentials and just create a new SSO link right back into iTunes U, almost transparently to the users.
Are there any better options to solve this problem? I know this would require some modification on the iTunes U side, but it seems like it'd solve some problems.
Thanks
Jason

Hi Jason,
I don't think I did a good job at explaining what I'm trying to get at. Sorry, let me try another way.
The problem is not one of security necessarily. If you get a signature back from Apple, sure, your jump site can verify that Apple sent you warnings about sessions that are about to timeout. The problem is that Apple cannot distinguish our local users from the identity and credentials we send. It might seem that way in specific instances (because some sites have an elaborate identity/credentialling scheme), but it is not true in the general case. It is entirely possible that scores of people can share exactly the same identity/credential info ... that is totally legal in the iTunes U world (and why I urge people not to think of "users" and "accounts" whenever they think iTunes U). For example, lessay I have a site that has a very simple credentialling scheme, say ...
Administrator@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:uic.edu
Instructor@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:uic.edu
Student@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:uic.edu
Authenticated@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:uic.edu
Unauthenticated@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:uic.edu
All@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:uic.edu
Further, let's say that I "anonymize" my users by sending no identity info to Apple. So if Apple sends my jump site the following:
credentials=Student@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:uic.edu
identity=
time=123456789
signature=stringwith_bunch_ofhex
which one of my local users does that belong to? ... whose session should I recredential? Sure, you can make a complex credentialling scheme that narrows usage down to the specific person ... but I would urge you to think of credentials as a kind of "hall pass" ... a token that lets you into a specific place within iTunes U ... and not as a way to identify someone. Remember that Apple has to use a system that applies in the general case and what I have above is totally legal. If I want, I can obfuscate my users to be certain that only -I- know who's accessing iTunes U.
Recall, too, the way that iTunes U is setup. Your transfer CGI sends a URL to Apple and Apple sends you back loads of HTML/JavaScript/CSS in return. Your transfer CGI passes all of it back to the end user. The heart of the HTML Apple sends is this itmss: redirect:
itmss://deimos.apple.com/WebObjects/Core.woa/BrowsePrivately/uic.edu?
credentialKey=1474615910&identity=2253747564656e7422203c5374756
4656e74407569632e6564753e202853747564656e7429205b305d&time=
1203747692&signature=32d169daa7a282f8c7efa7d4f7f7fb0dceaac507c26
f205123473f09d6b9ef50&x=true&ignore.mscache=8974210
That is how Apple talks to your end users. The session is private ... between Apple and your end users. The only way for you to know which session belongs to which local user is for Apple to send you that itmss link and say, in effect, "the session associated with this link is about to time out". Your jump site would have to maintain a connection between itmss links, your local users, and the credentials associated with both. But if your site is -already- caching local user/credential info, there is no need for Apple to send your creds/identity back to you.
As ever, if my understanding is itself cloudy, I bow to Duncan. He knows all and I am happy to be corrected. Like you guys, I am here to learn.

Just getting hold of Snow Leopard in the UK seems to be giving me problems!

Firstly an apology. Yes I know this isn’t the right part of the forum but honestly I have no idea where else to put it!
So, I ordered Snow Leopard just after it came out. I only got my Mac a month ago so I was able to order it for £8. Great. I waited and waited but no disk came in the post.
So I checked online to see if it had been delivered. Nope, it didn’t show anything but its odd how no one at Apple seemed to care or notice that an order had not turned up. So I email Apple (finding a way to contact Apple via the online order process is really hard, in the end I found a general customer service email address on the support page) and waited again. I received a ‘thanks we have your email we will contact you in 5 days’ email. So I waited 5 days still no disk, no email and an even more annoyed customer!
I emailed again, thinking “hey this is apple, it must be a mistake”. Well you guessed it. 5 days later still no disk and yet again no email.
So finally I rang customer services. “We are so sorry, let me post one out to right away via courier”. Great finally I’m getting my disk!! Wrong.
Here I am over a month later from when I ordered the disk. Do you think I have it yet?? No.
OK, so what do I do? I’ve emailed, rung and waited and waited. I really want the disk but Apple is just a joke. They really don’t seem to want my business, no wait the already took the money so I guess they can’t be bothered with shipping the product!
Anyone know what I should do?
Thank you.
Tom.

Refer to Apple (United Kingdom) - How to Contact Us for comprehensive contact info. Use the "Sales Support" contact phone number for online sales queries.
Call that number & ask for your order number, status, & shipping info. If the disc has been shipped, the delay is the responsibility of the shipper & you need to take the matter up with them. If Apple has not shipped it, then ask why.
For future reference, almost every page in the entire Apple universe has a "Contact us" link at the bottom of the page. That takes you to the above link, or to any country's version of it that is listed when you click on the contact page's round flag icon at the bottom of the current contact page.

Have been a "loyal" customer since phones were in the car only..yes 1989

I first joined what is now called Verizon in 1989 and have transitioned with this company through cell one, air-touch, through the pirate days when sprint and others were actually pirating phone numbers away......since the "Access Line" days. Well...here we are 24 years of uninterrupted service later... and now I have learned that we have become a bad customer because we had a misunderstanding over one very small bill that was the exact same amount two months in a row bill that represented a micro micro amount considering we have paid Verizon over $54,000. dollars for just service alone over the last 24 years...not including all the equipment and extra charges we have run up traveling abroad.....and the many many upgrades through the years. Now these toddler upstart pencil pushing "Consultants" that VERIZON has reportedly hired to evaluate our value as customers have determined that even though we spend about $2400. per year just on service alone.....suddenly, we are not good enough nor are we trusted enough to qualify for an IPAD MINI over 1 year nor are we even trusted enough to have our upgrade phone devices billed to our account (this has never happened in 24 years) . It was my college students hope to finance her own device as a step towards financial independence and because of this "Consulting Firm" we are now not only allowed to finance an IPAD Mini...nor can we even allowed to buy our new upgraded phone devices on our bill !!!!!! We watched in amazement as a rather rough looking young couple walked in and whipped right through the IPad finance process while I was trying to find out who put the negative ding on out 24 year old account....of course I was again told to call financial services...which I have done 2 times before and each time I was told that if I gave them more money they would go ahead and make the IPad thing happen and each time they took more money (we are now paid through May) and each time they posted the payments and then turned us down again and now we can no longer even go into the store and pick up new phones and pay with the monthly bill!! Who is running this company now? And who do they think made this company happen all those years back when they were fighting for their share of the market? I am so angry I can't even tell you how angry I am. Twenty four years and over $50,000. and they have decided we are not to be trusted? My next calls should be to the FCC and the Fair Truth in Lending agencies to file formal complaints. I hope to find out who is responsible for the damage to our record over a bill that was the exact same amount two months in a row and when we called to respond to a suspicious text regarding the bill we just had paid we were told to ignore it other than forwarding it to their "fraud and abuse dept" which is documented on our record. Then we went in to pick up our new phone and were told that our bill was past due again (this is all within just over 2 weeks) so they could not send us out with the phone and to call financial services. So I called again and was told I had paid....then after further pressing and searching I was told they had made an error and we had two bills for the same amount so they apologized and I paid the other bill and was told that cleared up everything and to proceed with the plans to get a new phone and the IPad Mini so I went back to the store and was then told we had been labeled as a bad dept over a $187.58 bill and they could no longer dispense any equipment without payment upfront. Keep in mind that our high balance just 2 years ago was over $1200.00 for travel abroad and that did nothing to our account except get us praise for being a great customer...and now over a minor error on their part I am a bad dept?????? Who is running this company anyway???
Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator

(much to long to quote,sorry)
Let me explain something to you your longevity with them has nothing to do with a credit check or an internal credit decision based on an upaid invoice now or in the past. Mistake or not, it is going to remain and your bill to account is done. That option by the way is a courtsey and not a given right.
And my good poster I had cell service before the bell system was getting into it. Was the 403 customer when the only game in town was Albany Telephone Company which was part of Cellular One and that was over 30+ years ago.
The company known as Verizon was starting out as Bell Atlantic, then it was NYNEX and then it was called Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile and then it acquired Air Touch, Arch Wireless and many others. And around 2000 it partnered with another company to be called Verizon Wireless. It was never Cellular One, Cingular which is now AT&T
Bottom line you have no issue as far as credit since they don't have to grant it. Heartening I know but true.
Sorry you had to rant, but I know it made you feel better.

How can I use Family Sharing for Store purchases if I use a different Apple ID for purchases?

A key feature of Apple's iCloud Family Sharing is the ability to share store purchases with invited family members. However, like many people, I use a different Apple ID for iCloud and Store purchases (ironically, primarily for the exact purpose of sharing among family).
Can I use iCloud Family Sharing to share purchases if I use a different Apple ID for Store (iTunes, App Store, etc.) purchases?

Sorry, let me clarify. I have two Apple IDs A and B:
A: Used for iCloud. All my calendar, mail, contacts, and other iCloud features are here. This is the ID I use as "the" iCloud on my iOS devices and OS X machines.
B: Used only for purchases, on all my devices and machines. This is what I used to log into iTunes, or to buy apps for iOS or OS X.
The issue is that the only way (currently) to set up Family Sharing is to invite from an iCloud ID (A, in my case) on an iOS 8 device. That's not the ID (B) I use for purchases. The question is whether there's a way to share those purchases given that I'm configured on all my devices with A for iCloud. (Clearly if I somehow send invitations from B, I can share purchases; but that's not the question.)
It sounds like the answer to that question is 'No'.
If that's the case, how do I invite from B? Do I have to configure an iOS device with B as the iCloud ID? My problem isn't that I want to ("willy nilly") avoid inviting form B; it's that there seems to be no way (certainly no convenient way) to do that.

Can I use Family Sharing for contacts? playlists?

My husband & I share our contact list. Can I transfer the contact list to my new Apple ID with family sharing?
I have been able to share music one song or artist at a time, but not playlists. Is there a way to share playlists with family sharing?

Sorry, let me clarify. I have two Apple IDs A and B:
A: Used for iCloud. All my calendar, mail, contacts, and other iCloud features are here. This is the ID I use as "the" iCloud on my iOS devices and OS X machines.
B: Used only for purchases, on all my devices and machines. This is what I used to log into iTunes, or to buy apps for iOS or OS X.
The issue is that the only way (currently) to set up Family Sharing is to invite from an iCloud ID (A, in my case) on an iOS 8 device. That's not the ID (B) I use for purchases. The question is whether there's a way to share those purchases given that I'm configured on all my devices with A for iCloud. (Clearly if I somehow send invitations from B, I can share purchases; but that's not the question.)
It sounds like the answer to that question is 'No'.
If that's the case, how do I invite from B? Do I have to configure an iOS device with B as the iCloud ID? My problem isn't that I want to ("willy nilly") avoid inviting form B; it's that there seems to be no way (certainly no convenient way) to do that.

Please read, Unlimited loyalty gone.

     We have been a Verizon customer for many many years now. Since they bought out Bellsouth Mobility back I don't know when, probably 20+ years ago. We have had our ups and downs over the years and have recommended and praised them to hundreds if not thousands of people during that time. But over the last few years it seems they just dont care about there customers anymore, just how many new ones we can get. When someone asks me about Verizon now all I can say is they have service here and I don't feel like I could recommend them over anyone else. It used to be just the opposite, I would say "There's no one better than Verizon" but not anymore. Over the last few days they have once again fallen another notch.
     It started with this Share Everything Plan that everyone is so upset over. So back on June the 14th I ordered me a new Galaxy S3 so I could keep my Unlimited Data Plan. And no I'm not one of these people the abuse the system as I only use about 2GB a month, and that is with three smartphones and two basic phones on our account. That's right a total of five lines. Anyway I called Verizon to check the status of my order on Monday July 9th and they told me that my order had been cancelled. Why? i asked and they could not tell me.
     What transpired during the initial order was the person on the phone that placed the order tried to save me some money. They first ordered it on a different line the was upgradable (instead of mine) because she thought she could save me an additional $50 but it didn't work. So then she cancelled that order and reordered it on my line and everything seemed fine. Went throught the terms of service at the end of the call and the whole thing. Then they sent me a TXT the next day and said if I want the order to complete I needed to log into my account and confirm once again which I did.
     Back to Monday when they said my order had been cancelled. They attempted to recover the order but were unable to find it. They could see the order had been cancelled and saw my confirmations of the same order but could not retrieve it. So here's the problem, my line shows that I have a phone on order so they can't reorder me a new phone. But the order they show active has been cancelled so I won't receive a new phone. Either way I cannot get a new phone. I have been on the phone with Verizon for approximately one hour a day for the last three days trying to get this resolved. In the middle of all of this they said if they did order my new phone that I most likely would not be able to have my unlimited data anymore because the order was not placed before the new plan took affect. So grudgingly I agreed to go to the new Share Everything Plan, changed everything over, and low and behold I still can't order a new phone. Why? because I already have one on order that has been cancelled.
     Now I figured over the last 20+ years that I have been a verizon customer that we have donated or payed through bills and new phones a sum of around $50,000! That's right and this is not an exaggeration. Now we"re not rich by any stretch of the imagination. Were just your average family who lives paycheck to paycheck and shares an account on verizon because it saves us some much needed money. But we have a good family that shares in the expense. When we upgrade at the reduced price it still is hard to do. But I do anyway because I like to have a new phone sometimes. This last experience sure took the fun out of that.
     So I said to the nice girl this morning, who swears I'll be able to buy a phone tomorrow, because they go onsale everywhere, how about when I order it tomorrow you give me free overnight shipping. Her response was "we"ll see what we can do". Really? Not "yes sir we can do that". Come on were talking $20 bucks in stead of $15, whatever they pay were only talking a few bucks. Wow, Really? we'll see?
     We have three smartphones that I would like to upgrade but how can I do that when they still can't do the first one. And after three days and three hours on the phone you would think someone would take notice and say "Hey we to get this resolved".
     Verizon really has no benefits or rewards for customer loyalty which is sad, because we are the ones that pay the bills when they sell a phone to someone who defaults or otherwise rips them of on their service. Were the stability in the company and we get treated like every bad customer that comes and goes. Verizon, you need someone who can step back from the rat race and say "hey we to to have a little more loyalty towards our customers" then maybe you will see a little more growth in your customer base that has been eluding you. I for one am someone who has lost his loyalty.
P.S. my number ends in 0737 if by chance someone would like to call from verizon. Administrator-Please forward this to someone in verizon who can help other than customer service.

I have to disagree with you in part here. I completely agree with the statement about Verizon being run by humans and humans make mistakes (why we call it being human when it does happen). I also agree that the benefits are good overall network coverage and lots of equipment choices, yet I disagree with the subsidized phone pricing being a benefit. The reason I disagree with this is, Verizon gets paid money from all of the App companies that have an app forced into the OS. This is to supposedly keep the cost of the phones down for the end users, and it does not go down. As a matter of fact it is just the opposite. If you buy a phone at full retail, Verizon still gets paid for the subsidy on your phone because all of the bloatware is still on your phone.
Secondly, a portion of your monthly bill goes to pay that subsidy back to Verizon and if you go past your contract (your contract ends and you do not upgrade, you go back to the month to month on it) that portion of the bill that goes to pay back the subsidy, keeps getting paid to Verizon as pure profit
The really big difference I think though is (back to the human part) since we all know mistakes are made, the measure of service now shifts from the mistake itself to how the mistake was rectified. If it is rectified by the company (any company not just Verizon) as We are so sorry let us fix this right away for you and I will monitor the account and make sure this does not happen again, then the company has built a loyal customer (with me Verizon hits this mark about 80% of the time). If however, the company shifts the blame to a third party, or gives the Verizon Company Line of "this is the first I am hearing about any issues with XXXX phone", and the issue is clearly outlined in not only these forums, but also documentation that Verizon Keeps of Known issues, then you end up losing a Loyal customer who will only stay with a company for a reason that benefits the user.
Example, I got much better Customer service with AT&T and if the service and usability of the network, and the equipment was the same as Verizons, we would not be having this conversation as I would still be with AT&T. unfortunately for AT&T their network is substandard, has a lot of outages etc... so it is in my benefit to go to another company for my service. A company that will give me some benefit of using the service like reliability, or usability, or selection of equipment will catch my attention a lot faster then price. Again Verizon meets this portion 97% of the time (with me) so not only do I have the service, reliability, selection of equipment on board, they are usually easier to deal with and they can usually understand the problem and try to help. That is what built me to a loyal customer of Verizon, and even through ups and downs like we are currently going through, I am still loyal.

How to add a own field in payroll slip?

Hi friends, we want to add a field in payroll slip that consists in a formula. We search for help of how to reach this, but when the slip itu2019s printed the field itu2019s not calculated so appears in zero.
These are the steps we made, if something itu2019s missing please help us.
Steps:
1) Created table ZLIQ in se11.
MANDT               MANDT     CLNT          3     0          Mandante
CCNOMINA          LGART     CHAR          4     0          CC-nómina
CANTIDAD          ANZHL     DEC          7     2          Cantidad
IMPORTE               ZIMPOR     DEC          1     5     2     IMPORTE DESDE
2) in order to have available these fields in the paid slip we execute the transaction PE51_CHECKTAB, adding the fields of table ZLIQ (form class CEDT)
3) We add the fields of the table ZLIQ in the transaction PE51.
4) We changed the program HVECEDT0.
4.1.- We used the INCLUDE RPCEDDZ9 in order to define the structure of ZLIQ:
ENHANCEMENT 1 ZCAMBIOS_LIQ_DEF.    "active version
DATA: BEGIN OF Zliq OCCURS 15,
ccnomina like Zliq-ccnomina,
cantidad like Zliq-cantidad,
importe like Zliq-importe,
END OF Zliq.
ENDENHANCEMENT.
4.2.-We changed the INCLUDE RPCEDSZ9 the form: POS-FIX-DATA-MOD and just assign fix values in order to test.
ENHANCEMENT 1 ZCAMBIOS_LIQ_LL.    "active version
    zliq-ccnomina = '3030'.
    zliq-cantidad = 303.
    zliq-importe = 30303030.
ENDENHANCEMENT.
To test we execute the payroll and finally the values are not displayed.
Could you help us?
Thanks in advance.
Albio.-

Hi.
Sorry, let me try to explain it better.
Z -> it's a customer field table that we add in the payroll slip using transaction PE51, and previusly defined in PE51_CHECKTAB. This field table "Z" it's also defined in a abap program for payroll slip: RPCEDDZ9.
500 -> it's a fixed value assigned to the "Z" field table in the include program to the custumer field Z. This assigment it's done in the Inlcude: RPCEDSZ9, form: POS-FIX-DATA-MOD. (this "500" it's going to be changed latter for a formula, the 500 it's just used to test)
Regards
Albio

Error while Exporting large data from Reportviewer on azure hosted website.

Hi,
I have website hosted on azure. I used SSRS reportviewer control to showcase my reports. while doing so i faced an issue.
Whenever i export large amount of data as Excel/PDF/word/tiff it abruptly throw following error:
Error: Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.ReportServerException: The remote server returned an error: (401) Unauthorized. ---> System.Net.WebException: The remote server returned an error: (401) Unauthorized.
at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.EndGetResponse(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
at Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.SoapReportExecutionService.ServerUrlRequest(AbortState abortState, String url, Stream outputStream, String& mimeType, String& fileNameExtension)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.SoapReportExecutionService.ServerUrlRequest(AbortState abortState, String url, Stream outputStream, String& mimeType, String& fileNameExtension)
at Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.SoapReportExecutionService.Render(AbortState abortState, String reportPath, String executionId, String historyId, String format, XmlNodeList deviceInfo, NameValueCollection urlAccessParameters, Stream reportStream, String& mimeType, String& fileNameExtension)
at Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.ServerReport.InternalRender(Boolean isAbortable, String format, String deviceInfo, NameValueCollection urlAccessParameters, Stream reportStream, String& mimeType, String& fileNameExtension)
at Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.ServerReport.Render(String format, String deviceInfo, NameValueCollection urlAccessParameters, String& mimeType, String& fileNameExtension)
at Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.ServerModeSession.RenderReport(String format, Boolean allowInternalRenderers, String deviceInfo, NameValueCollection additionalParams, Boolean cacheSecondaryStreamsForHtml, String& mimeType, String& fileExtension)
at Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.ExportOperation.PerformOperation(NameValueCollection urlQuery, HttpResponse response)
at Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
at System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)
It works locally (developer machine) or having less data. But it didn't work with large data when publish on azure.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks.

Sorry, let me clarify my questions as they were ambiguous:
For a given set if input, does the request always take the same amount of time to fail? How long does it take?
When it works (e.g. on local machine using same input), how big is the output file that gets downloaded?
Also, if you can share your site name (directly or
indirectly), and the UTC time where you made an attempt, we may be able to get more info on our side.

Sorry, let me clarity...(DNG 8, XP, CS2)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for