Sort order in ODS active table ?

Hello BW Experts,
What sort order is data stored in the ODS active table.
Thanks,
BWer

Bwer
Check this link and hope this helps
Thanks
Sat
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/10/54853b175d214ee10000000a11402f/frameset.htm

Similar Messages

Want to change the default sort order of a Advanced table

Hi all ,
Hope all of you doing good.
I am trying to change the deafult sort order of a " View Applicants" advanced table on Irecruitment selfservice page , using personalization feature but its not sorting as expected.
The default sort order is asc by the name of the applicants. I wanted to override it by " Date Applied " desc using personalizing the advanced table.
But its not sorting by Date applied and still shows the sort by applicant name.
Any inputs will be greatly helpful
I am using the Oracle Apps 11.5.10 version.

Hey guys m I got the answer for the below question.
Oracle have few Restriction and limitation on such Advanced table in sorting the data,
Few of them are as mentioned below ...
1. Sorting is not allowed for tables that allow inserts.
2. Sorting is not supported for tables containing updateable columns
3. Sorting is disabled when the Select column is checked for a row in a table or when Hide/Show is present in a table.
Because of the above limitations , we cannot sort or override the existing alphabetical name sort order to Date applied sort order on the View Applicant advanced table.
You can observe that , View Applicant page is having an option called "Update Status" which allow us to update applicant’s status or rating in the Advanced table.
On such updatable advanced tables, oracle does not allow us to override the sort order on any of the table columns.
Keeping it in a nutshell , I can say it's does not allow us to change the sort order of the view applicant advanced table ( which is having updateable columns ) to sort them in Date applied instead of Name( which is default ).

To find Where-Used of ODS Active table

Dear Experts,
I am having an ODS for which I wish to know wherever the active table is used as reference. It has been used in many places in ABAP routines of transformations. I wish to know wherever the table is included.
I checked in SE11 for where used list with all fields in table included option. It is giving only the table structure and nothing else.
Can anyone help on this since we want to calculate the impact of this ODS in report level.
Thanks,
Rajarathnam.S

Dear Raja,
Thanks for the information. The code is throwing dump on execution possibly because the table structures are changed in new releases ( I am not sure of this).
But I was able to get the necessary information from the tables used in the ABAP code by manually using SE11 (RSTRAN and RSAABAP)
I am closing the question.
Thanks,
Rajarathnam.S
Edited by: rajarathnam S on Jan 15, 2010 8:29 AM

Allow Sort Order to be configurable

Apparently, when I set Sort Order in Library (I like it as Captured Time), it is reset to the system-defined default of Added Order upon a new import. I'd like the preferred sort order to be either settable as a preference, or at least have the setting be "sticky" so that it stays at what the user sets it as until the user changes it. Thanks!
Dilip

Hello,
As you have discovered by default both dequeueing via a condition and dequeue via a correlation identifier have never honoured the sort order of the queue table.
You can get it to honour the sort order by setting the following event at the session or system level or in the spfile/pfile as follows
alter session set events '10866 trace name context forever, level 1';
or
alter system set events '10866 trace name context forever, level 1';
or
alter system set event='10866 trace name context forever, level 1' scope=spfile;
Once this is set and a dequeue condition is being used an extra order by based on the sort columns of the queue table will be added to the sql which is executed internally.
So this could have an impact on the dequeue performance when using a deq_condition or dequeueing via correlation id but ultimately you will have the ordering you require.
Thanks
Peter

Hierarchy table sort order no longer required in 11.1.1.3?

Hi guys,
I am working on loading Dimensions through EPMA interface tables. Hyperion version 11.1.1.3. The sort order for the records was not in line with the hierarchy. Still the dimension got loaded without any errors. I remember in the older versions we would have to have the records in the hierarchy table in the right order for the metadata to get loaded properly.
Just wanted to confirm if this is a 11.1.13 version enhancement and not something that I am missing.
Thanks.

Hi Luc,
I have checked our bug DB, but couldn't find any bug that would explain a change in behavior of processDatabaseChangeNotification() in 11.1.1.3
On the contrary, we have been working on issues related to NPE during its execution recently (fix will be included in JDev 11.1.1.4.0).
Could you create a Service Request in "My Oracle Support" and upload your sample ?
We will have a look.
Regards,
Didier.

Sorting Order for SAP Tables in DB2 database

Dear Experts -
ISSUE: When an ABAP program selects data from the DB into an internal
table, it is changing the way the data is sorted. In other words, the
internal table data is in a different sort order than what is in the
DB. It is not working this way in all other non-production systems
(DEV, QAS, SAX, etc).
Temporary solution for the programs that have been identified as
impacted: Use the ABAP Command 'sort' on the internal table.
Permanent solution needed : Since it is impossible to identify all
of the programs that will be impacted, we need PRD to work like DEV,
QAS, SAX, etc. when selecting data into internal tables. The data
should be in the same order as it is in the DB (sorted by the key).
ADDITIONAL INFO: DB2 storage disks crashed a day before. H/W team recovered everything. We are facing this only after the recovery.
Thanks,
Dinesh

can you please check in your code if the sql that is being sent has an order by clause .
Please let us know the SQL statements that is basically used to fill up the internal table.
When data is fetched from the database, it is not sorted always. Probably you had a clustered index on the tables and the clustering is not there now.
Edited by: Ratnajit Dey on Dec 16, 2011 1:56 PM

How to change the sort order of complex table in drop down

Hi Team,
I have a complex table which is working but the sort order i want in a different way. How can i change?
Regards,
Gupta

Gupta,
My screen field definitions are as follows:
1. Location
2. Partner
--In my previous reply, the first screen shot is without any parent index. So it is giving all values in alphabetical order only.
--After that I created parent index for partner with location, So the partner values are depend on location chosen.
In my TEST1:
--I just selected "Andhra pradesh" as location, In partner field drop down it is showing "Ragava" "Suman" "Sunitha" only.
--Because these are only the values belong to "andhra pradesh" location and these are coming in alphabetical order only.
TEST2:
--Here I selected "Gujrat" as location, In partner field drop down it is showing "Avinash" "Mohan" "Suman" which are belong to "Gujrat" location, These are also in alphabetical order only.
Hope this clears now. Still any query please post.
Thanks,
Swaroopa.

Sort Order in Pivot Table

Hi,
I am unable to get sort order in desc , even if I specify the descending order for that measure column in criteria.
The view I'm using is Pivot View.
Thankyou,
Vinay

Assuming the column you want to sort on is not the first column in the rows section of your pivot table, then do this:
1) Duplicate the column that you wish to sort on.
2) Move that column all the way to the left so it is the first column.
3) Apply the sort to this column.
4) Hide the column.
This will sort the pivot table...

How to restore default sort order on a table?

Have an ADF table with some sortable columns, populated by an SQL view (having its own Order By).
Looking for a way to let user revert to default sort order after sorting columns.
Currently, I have a button linked to:
public String cmdRefreshOrders() {
this.getTblOrders().setSortCriteria(null);
DCIteratorBinding iter = ADFUtils.findIterator("iterUnderlyingTable");
iter.executeQuery();
return null;
This doesn't work
Any ideas?

Tried. Doesn't work.
Iterator doesn't have a setOrderByClause() -- closest I see is applySortCriteria(), which takes an array of SortCriterias, not a String. Might be able to parse Order By string to create array of SortCriterias, but this smells wrong. Probably wouldn't work anyway because ...
Tried doing iter.applySortCriteria(null) before executeQuery. This accomplished nothing -- the sort created from clicking the column header persisted.
Looks to me like the sort is persisting as some property in the table or in the display column.
Any more ideas?
Thanks
Ed

Default column sort order for 11g table

Could anyone give me some indication on how I would go about setting the default sort order for a table?
I have a table with a few columns, and dataset returns in a particular order, but my table decides to sort if in any given order until I manually click on the column header and sort it.
I would like to have it done by default on a particular field.
Any info is appreciated.
Thanks
Jonny

As Chris says, the easiest way and best re-use way is to use the order-by clause in your underlying model layer SQL query. For instance in ADF BC this would be in a View Object's query.
However as you haven't dictated your model layer technology, there is another way in JDev 11g. In your web page that contains the ADF Faces RC table, select the binding tab at the bottom of the page, then double click on the iterator in the binding page, and in the Edit Iterator Binding dialog, select the Sort Criteria tab. This allows you to override the sort order on the iterator's columns.
CM.

30EA2 - SQL-Developer 3.0.02 Another Table Data Sort Order Bug

Although the "30EA1 - SQL-Developer 3.0.02 Table Data Sort Order Bug" still exists in 30EA2, there is a new substantial mistake.
How to see it:
Open table1 (Preference "Automatically Freeze Object Viewer Windows" is set). Click data.
Open table2. Click data.
Go back to table1. Click Sort. => You see the columns of table2. The is no way to sort table1, before you close the table2 window (tab).
Edited by: oestreicher1 on 01.12.2010 04:54

Logged Bug 10358797 - ea2: grid sorter shows wrong columns
-Raghu

Are the database tables stored in a sorted order?

Hi-
Are the records in a databse table stored in a sorted order based on key fields??
Thanks.
Ramesh.

A,
Unfortunately, this is not a clearly or fully explained concept in the BC400 class.
As stated in the course text, the ITAB will have the "order" of the DB table.
This may or may not be in actual key order. It depends on whether or not the primary key index is ALWAYS kept up to date / ordered by your DBAs.
This is rarely done as it is very "expensive" to the system... vitually impossible to be truthful.
Because of this, you can never GUARANTEE in a Production system that all records are stored in a primary key order. To guarantee ordering, you must FORCE the system to order the result set through:
ORDER BY
or
SORT after the database retrieval is completed and the result set is returned to the App server

How to set default sorting order in ADF Table

Hi,
I want to set the default sorting order as ascending in adf table. Please help me regarding how can we do it.
Using JDev 11.1.1.5.0

Hi Frank,
Thanks for the quick reply.
I have done binding of table with list of pojos.
The Class for which Data control is created is as:-
public class DemoDC {
    private List<TableEntity> tableList =
        new ArrayList<TableEntity>();
    public List<TableEntity> getTableList() {
        return tableList;
    public void setTableList(List<TableEntity> tableList) {
        this.tableList = tableList;
where TableEntity is a pojo which has all the columns as its attributes.
Now when i do the above steps , after clicking on pencil icon and seecting the iterator name in the iterator tab (DemoDC-> tableList) , and selcting the 'sort criteria' tab when i select a column and try to set the sort order I get error as ' Iterator can not be created for the selected node ' .

Insert into table irrespective of sorting order of a field

Hi All,
I am not able to insert data in the data base table(YY...) as it is in the internal table.
I do have data in following order in the internal table :
I am simply using statement insert (database table) from (wa) in the loop...endloop.
001   0002 2008 0000494219 001   0000494219          254.02 W4136      Keller & Kalmbach Widex
001   0002 2008 0000198630 001   0000494219          100.10 W4136      Keller & Kalmbach Widex
001   0002 2008 0000198418 001   0000494219           39.57 W4136       Keller & Kalmbach Widex
001   0002 2008 0000198419 001   0000494219           89.93 W4136       Keller & Kalmbach Widex
but when data is inserted in the table it appears as below:
Means system is sorting the data in ascending order based on 4th column which is document number.
001   0002 2008 0000198418 001   0000494219           39.57 W4136       Keller & Kalmbach Widex
001   0002 2008 0000198419 001   0000494219           89.93 W4136       Keller & Kalmbach Widex 001   0002 2008 0000198630 001   0000494219          100.10 W4136      Keller & Kalmbach Widex 001   0002 2008 0000494219 001   0000494219          254.02 W4136      Keller & Kalmbach Widex
How can I keep the sequence of data as it is in the internal table when I insert them into data base table.
Thanks,
Mark

Assign one more field (let's say SEQ_NO). In your loop keep on incrementing this field and insert in database.
You have to add this field as first primary key in your database table also.
Hence you data will look like
1 001 0002 2008 0000494219 001 0000494219 254.02 W4136 Keller & Kalmbach Widex
2 001 0002 2008 0000198630 001 0000494219 100.10 W4136 Keller & Kalmbach Widex
3 001 0002 2008 0000198418 001 0000494219 39.57 W4136 Keller & Kalmbach Widex
4 001 0002 2008 0000198419 001 0000494219 89.93 W4136 Keller & Kalmbach Widex
Regards,
Mohaiyuddin

Predefined sort order of columns

Hi,
when my Discoverer users add columns to their tables they expect a certain sort order without having to press the 'sort button' or use the 'edit sheet dialog'.
My only idea so far is to use a custom folder and ORDER BY in the SQL.
Is there any better way to achieve a certain predefined sort order?
Thanks
Franziska

While creating calculations and adding sorts on all of the columns will solve the immediate issue, every new worksheet will require the users to go through the same steps. It also sounds like your users actively create workbooks and sheets as needed, and these steps will have to be repeated.
Something I thought of this morning may (or may not) work, and unfortunately I do not have time to test it today. But ... what if you created a view with an ORDER BY clause to sort the data as you wanted it sorted. In theory, the results should be returned ordered, without having to add any sorts at the Disco level. Since there is a fair amount of work in "retooling" a BA to use the views, it would be good to do a small proof of concept. Like I said, it might not work for a variety of reasons, and I am not sure what would happen if a user added a sort in Disco, or when two folders were joined.
If it works, though, the sorting would be performed at the database level, with no additional sorting in Disco, and adding and removing columns from a report would have no impact on the sort.
Then again, it might not work at all.

Sort order in ODS active table ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for