Source codes of Solaris 8/9

Hello!
Where download source codes of Solaris 8/9?

Sun doesn't release their source codes. You can download the Solaris 9 operating environment from http://wwws.sun.com/software/solaris/get.html

Similar Messages

How can I get login.c, passwd.c command source code in Solaris 8.0 ?

Hi, Everybody,
How are you doing?
I have lots of questions.
Q1)
I can't rebuild kernel of Solaris 8.0 source.
If someone has an answer, would you give it to me ?
It will help for me.
Q2)
In addition I want get login.c and passwd.c command source.
I unziped the CD of Solaris 8.0 source, buf I cannot find the source code for login.c and passwd.c command.
Would you help me ?
Thank you

http://www.4shared.com/file/210566155/c080d93a/db_online.html

Issue in compiling code on solaris 10 - please help

I wanted to migrate old PRO *C source code to solaris 10 and oracle 10 enviroment, so copied all files , done settings and tried compiling it. It is giving below error. Any guess why it is happening?
Syntax error at line 69, column 2, file /usr/include/sys/uio.h:
Error at line 69, column 2 in file /usr/include/sys/uio.h
lloff_t uiooffset; /* file offset */
.1
PCC-S-02201, Encountered the symbol "lloff_t" when expecting one of the followin
g:
} char, const, double, enum, float, int, long, ulong_varchar,
OCIBFileLocator OCIBlobLocator, OCIClobLocator, OCIDateTime,
OCIExtProcContext, OCIInterval, OCIRowid, OCIDate, OCINumber,
OCIRaw, OCIString, short, signed, sql_context, sql_cursor,
struct, union, unsigned, utext, uvarchar, varchar, void,
volatile, a typedef name,
The symbol "enum," was substituted for "lloff_t" to continue.

I wanted to migrate old PRO *C source code to solaris 10 and oracle 10 enviroment, so copied all files , done settings and tried compiling it. It is giving below error. Any guess why it is happening?
Syntax error at line 69, column 2, file /usr/include/sys/uio.h:
Error at line 69, column 2 in file /usr/include/sys/uio.h
lloff_t uiooffset; /* file offset */
.1
PCC-S-02201, Encountered the symbol "lloff_t" when expecting one of the followin
g:
} char, const, double, enum, float, int, long, ulong_varchar,
OCIBFileLocator OCIBlobLocator, OCIClobLocator, OCIDateTime,
OCIExtProcContext, OCIInterval, OCIRowid, OCIDate, OCINumber,
OCIRaw, OCIString, short, signed, sql_context, sql_cursor,
struct, union, unsigned, utext, uvarchar, varchar, void,
volatile, a typedef name,
The symbol "enum," was substituted for "lloff_t" to continue.

Source codes of the Unix commands

It is still me, in spite of my bad English, I hope that you would understand my question. In fact, I am with the research of the place where I could find the source codes of the various commands of the Unix(sunSolaris) environment. Thank you .
Patrick

It is still me, in spite of my bad English, I hope
that you would understand my question. In fact, I am
with the research of the place where I could find the
source codes of the various commands of the
Unix(sunSolaris) environment. Thank you .If you want the source for the Solaris commands, you'll have to talk to Sun. It usually costs a lot of money, though there may be educational discounts available.
If you just want to see source for commands that are similar to the Solaris ones, there are plenty of Open Source UNIX-like OSes available on the Web. I'd recommend looing at OpenBSD if you want to see clean well-coded implementations.

Compilation error for code in Solaris 8 which was compiled in SUNOS 4.1.3

Hi,
I compiled the C source files in Solaris 8 which was earlier compiled in SUNOS 4.1.3(Solaris 1.1).
On compiling I get following discrepencies: 1. Executable size are considerably different.
2. I am using some X windoes system library, it gives compilation error like "prototype mismatch 2 arguments passed when 3 required". "improper member use: fd " fd is the member od display structure.
3. "identifier redeclared: shmat current : function() returning pointer to char
previous: function(int, pointer to const void, int) returning pointer to void : "/usr/include/sys/shm.h""
4. Also I am getting "cg error :..: Disk quota exceeded " while compiling one of the modules.
Please let me know solution of all/any of these.
Thanks in advance!!
Edited by: SmithaIVR on Dec 3, 2008 2:20 AM

Sounds like ancient code that no longer matches current API's.
Theres not much option except to rewrite those bits.

Where can I download the source code of MaxDB (even an older version)?

Just want to learn some modules of MaxDB. But now I failed to find where to download it.
Is there any old archive for the older version of MaxDB source code for download?
Thanks in advance.

At times when the sources were available I tried to build it on a "new" platform (Solaris x86 32bit) and I can tell you: it's NOTHING that is obvious. Building OpenOffice or Mozilla may appear like an easy task. It took me months to get there and to be able to just build the 'build tools'.
On top, many of the sources are (historically) written in a Pascal dialect and are transferred to C with an own precompiler so there are three languages used (C, C++ and Pascal) - so it's a pretty hard (next to impossible) job to learn some algorithms from those sources.
See also here:
http://cjcollier.livejournal.com/177628.html
http://home.snafu.de/~dittmar/sapdbdev/
and just to get an idea of the modules and their structure:
http://home.snafu.de/~dittmar/sapdbdev/sapdbModules.txt
Markus

Protecting the source code

I heard about the possibilty of decompiling the java code and getting back the source code, is this flaw specific to java or is it common among all programming langauges?
how is it possible to protect the source code? and how expensive is the solution?
thank you

This is not a flaw!
Java is compiled on the byte level not bit level. This is so because the same class can run on Windows, Solaris, Linux and Unix. This makes the execution a little bit slower and easier to decompile but a small price to pay for cross platform compatibilty.

How to make Open Source work on Solaris 10, x86 ?

I'm trying to make this Open Source code for MDBTools work on my
Solaris 10, x86.
What this tool does is to read in a Microsoft Access MDB file, and
outputs the contents of that database file, into an ASCII text file.
I unzipped these files already, but how do I make "mdbtools" work on
Solaris x86, version 10?
http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=soft&words=mdbtools
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mdbtools/files/mdbtools/mdbtools-0.6pre1.tar.gz/download

checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking dlfcn.h usability... yes
checking dlfcn.h presence... yes
checking for dlfcn.h... yes
checking for g++... no
checking for c++... no
checking for gpp... no
checking for aCC... no
checking for CC... no
checking for cxx... no
checking for cc++... no
checking for cl... no
checking for FCC... no
checking for KCC... no
checking for RCC... no
checking for xlC_r... no
checking for xlC... no
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no
checking whether g++ accepts -g... no
checking dependency style of g++... none
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
checking for g77... no
checking for f77... no
checking for xlf... no
checking for frt... no
checking for pgf77... no
checking for fl32... no
checking for af77... no
checking for fort77... no
checking for f90... no
checking for xlf90... no
checking for pgf90... no
checking for epcf90... no
checking for f95... no
checking for fort... no
checking for xlf95... no
checking for lf95... no
checking for g95... no
checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... no
checking whether accepts -g... no
checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 262144
checking command to parse /usr/ccs/bin/nm -p output from gcc object... ok
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for ar... false
checking for ranlib... :
checking for strip... :
checking if gcc static flag works... yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC
checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/ccs/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... solaris2.10 ld.so
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... no
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... yes
configure: creating libtool
appending configuration tag "CXX" to libtool
checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/ccs/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
libtool.m4: error: problem compiling CXX test program
checking for g++ option to produce PIC...
checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... no
checking whether the g++ linker (/usr/ccs/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... solaris2.10 ld.so
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... no
appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool
checking for flex... no
checking for lex... no
checking for yywrap in -lfl... no
checking for yywrap in -ll... yes
checking for bison... no
checking for byacc... no
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
checking fcntl.h usability... yes
checking fcntl.h presence... yes
checking for fcntl.h... yes
checking limits.h usability... yes
checking limits.h presence... yes
checking for limits.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking wordexp.h usability... yes
checking wordexp.h presence... yes
checking for wordexp.h... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking Are we using flex ... yes
checking for SQLGetPrivateProfileString in -lodbcinst... no
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.0... yes (version 2.4.1)
checking for libglade-2.0 libgnomeui-2.0... yes
checking GNOME_CFLAGS... -DORBIT2=1 -mt -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/openwin/include -I/usr/sfw/include -I/usr/sfw/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0
checking GNOME_LIBS... -mt -lglade-2.0 -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lmlib -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lgobject-2.0 -lresolv -lnsl -lsocket -lm -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0
checking gtk-doc version >= 1.0... yes
checking for initscr in -lncurses... no
checking for add_history in -lreadline... no
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating src/Makefile
config.status: creating libmdb.pc
config.status: creating libmdbsql.pc
config.status: creating src/util/Makefile
config.status: creating src/extras/Makefile
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating include/Makefile
config.status: creating src/libmdb/Makefile
config.status: creating src/sql/Makefile
config.status: creating src/odbc/Makefile
config.status: creating doc/Makefile
config.status: creating src/gmdb2/Makefile
config.status: creating src/gmdb2/gladefiles/Makefile
config.status: creating src/gmdb2/pixmaps/Makefile
config.status: creating src/gmdb2/help/Makefile
config.status: creating src/gmdb2/help/C/Makefile
config.status: creating mdbtools.spec
config.status: creating include/mdbver.h
config.status: creating include/config.h
config.status: include/config.h is unchanged
config.status: executing depfiles commands
@

Problem while compiling the Device Driver source code onSolaris 8 intel pla

Hello!
We are writing Device Driver for PCI (PMC) based HS serial
communication card on Solaris 8(intel edition).The Processor
used is Celeron/Pentium III.
We are facing following problems.
1) Kindly let us know the cc compiler options for xarch=isa.
2) Presently we have included following header files.
     #include <sys/ddi.h>
     #include <sys/sunddi.h>
3)We tried to compile our driver soure file (pmc.c) using
FORTE DEVELOPER 6 UPDATE 1 with the following command.
     # cc -Xa -D_KERNEL -c pmc.c
4) The compiler is not able to reach to our source code. It prematurely fails
while compiling the system header files
5) The errors were reported during Preprocessor
compilation in /SYS/*.h header files.
cc: Warning: using -Xa, ignoring all other -X options
"/usr/include/iso/limits_iso.h", line 54: warning: macro redefined: SHRT_MIN
"/usr/include/iso/limits_iso.h", line 56: warning: macro redefined: USHRT_MAX
"/usr/include/iso/limits_iso.h", line 59: warning: macro redefined: UINT_MAX
"/usr/include/sys/vnode.h", line 486: syntax error before or at: rlim64_t
"/usr/include/sys/vnode.h", line 486: warning: undefined or missing type for: rlim64_t
"/usr/include/sys/vnode.h", line 487: warning: undefined or missing type for: cred_t
"/usr/include/sys/vnode.h", line 487: warning: undefined or missing type for: ssize_t
"/usr/include/vm/page.h", line 468: undefined or not a type: pgcnt_t
6)Kindly let us know :-
a) if any Environment variables to be set.
b) What all the system include headre files are required & in what sequence if any.
Expecting a early reply .
Can anybody help us.
Thanking you for your kind co-operation.
A.P.SINGH
INDIA

Try to use cc comiler from /opt/SUNWspro/bin/ like
/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -Xa -D_KERNEL -c pmc.c

Java 1.5.0_05 source code?

Does anyone know where I can find the source code for Java 1.5.0_05? I did find one promising location, but the source was packaged in ways that could only be expanded on Windows and Solaris, not on Mac OS X (the OS I'm running.)
Thanks.

Which source are you after? Just the API, or the JVM. The API should be in a file called "src.zip" in the JDK install folder.The API, but the problem is in getting a "JDK install folder" to look in. The newest sources from Sun (JDK 1.5.0_09, I believe) comes in a format I can decompress on Mac, but the archived ones are in native Windows and Solaris formats that I can't get to.
You're right in that Java for Mac is developed by Apple, but I had assumed that the source for the core "java", "javax", etc. packages stayed the same. Perhaps that's not true?
Anyway, I'll see if I can get it from Apple.
Thanks.

Sun.* packeges source code

Kindly can somebody tell me where from i can down load the source code of sun.*(sun.misc.ProxyGenerator) packages that are being used in JDK classes. kindly tell me.

Why Developers Should Not Write Programs That Call 'sun' Packages
The classes that Sun includes with the Java 2 SDK, Standard Edition, fall into package groups java.*, javax.*, org.* and sun.*. All but the sun.* packages are a standard part of the Java platform and will be supported into the future. In general, packages such as sun.*, that are outside of the Java platform, can be different across OS platforms (Solaris, Windows, Linux, Macintosh, etc.) and can change at any time without notice with SDK versions (1.2, 1.2.1, 1.2.3, etc). Programs that contain direct calls to the sun.* packages are not 100% Pure Java. In other words:
The java.*, javax.* and org.* packages documented in the Java 2 Platform Standard Edition API Specification make up the official, supported, public interface.
If a Java program directly calls only API in these packages, it will operate on all Java-compatible platforms, regardless of the underlying OS platform.
The sun.* packages are not part of the supported, public interface.
A Java program that directly calls into sun.* packages is not guaranteed to work on all Java-compatible platforms. In fact, such a program is not guaranteed to work even in future versions on the same platform.
For these reasons, there is no documentation available for the sun.* classes. Platform-independence is one of the great advantages of developing in the Java programming language. Furthermore, Sun and our licensees of Java technology are committed to maintaining backward compatibility of the APIs for future versions of the Java platform. (Except for code that relies on serious bugs that we later fix.) This means that once your program is written, the class files will work in future releases.
Each company that implements the Java platform will do so in their own private way. The classes in sun.* are present in the SDK to support the Sun implementation of the Java platform: the sun.* classes are what make the Java platform classes work "under the covers" for the Sun Java 2 SDK. These classes will not in general be present on another vendor's Java platform. If your Java program asks for a class "sun.package.Foo" by name, it may fail with ClassNotFoundError, and you will have lost a major advantage of developing in Java.
Technically, nothing prevents your program from calling into sun.* by name. From one release to another, these classes may be removed, or they may be moved from one package to another, and it's fairly likely that their interface (method names and signatures) will change. (From the Sun point of view, since we are committed to maintaining the Java platform, we need to be able to change sun.* to refine and enhance the platform.) In this case, even if you are willing to run only on the Sun implementation, you run the risk of a new version of the implementation breaking your program.
In general, writing java programs that rely on sun.* is risky: they are not portable, and are not supported.
~

Need source code or help for COMM_FAILURE 209

Hi,
Anyone know where I can get the source code for the com.sun.jndi.cosnaming package? I'm trying to debug this message WARNING: "IOP00410209: (COMM_FAILURE) Connection rebind". Only get this problem when connecting to solaris, fine on windows.
We run tnameserv and jdk1.4.2 on both. Also tried using jacorb, get same problem. The ORB's don't return any errors, error only on client side. Client is also jdk1.4.2 running on windows.
Ted.

Sorry,
but nobody here will do your homework for you. If you have problems with your code let us know and we try to help, but never ask for source code.
Phil

How can I download the full source code for the Java 3D package

how can I download the full source code for javax.media.j3d
especially I need the Transform3D.java class.
thanks a lot
Meir

thank you guys I'll try to do so, I suggest you to
join me.From the one of the (ex-!)Java3D team:
"I'm glad to see that Sun has decided to officially support an
open source Java/OpenGL binding, JOGL. Perhaps they will
eventually decide to make Java 3D open source. However, be
careful what you wish for. The Java 3D source is huge and
complex. There are native sections for Solaris, Windows/OpenGL,
and Windows/Direct3D, plus common code. I don't know how you'd
open source a build process that requires different pieces of
the code be built on different machines running different
operating systems."
Sounds scary - I hope we're ready for it :)

Netstat source code

I need to develop a tool which supposed to list all opened socket and their state like netstat. Can
anybody tell me which header file and which library I need to use and how?
Or can i get source code of NETSTAT for solaris, which will be extremely useful for me?
Thanks
Rajesh

i suggest you read the license
there is also a gpl version of netstatAs far as I understood rajesh930 only wants to look at the source to understand how the tool works. He does not want to modify or use the source.
=> No license problems.
Martin

DLOPEN source code.

Hello all,
I wanted to know if anyone could provide any information regarding possible source code for the dlopen function provided in Solaris? If you could give me any information regarding this topic it would be greatly appreciated.
-S

for all kinds of reasons.

Source codes of Solaris 8/9

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for