Spacebar, other keys, produce odd results, codes

I'm encountering a really weird problem with a Powerbook running Mac OS X 10.3.9 -- when various keys (spacebar, delete, etc) are pressed, various functions occur (Expose hide windows, lower sound volume, etc). Also, if the cursor was in a text window, consistent, odd text is generated on each key press.
Pressing spacebar, for example, activates the Expose hide windows function (the same as pressing F11) and "6yhn" is typed whereever the cursor was.
I tried turning off Expose in it's System Preference Panel and that stopped Expose from being triggered, but the 6yhn is still typed.
I also checked the International System Preference to see if any other keyboards were active, but none were.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

Solved!
Quicktime has an HD Jones.... If you chuck 16:9 native footage at it, it assumes that it must be HD. In the end batched the rushes thru Mpeg StreamClip.

Similar Messages

  • Keyboard f keys suddenly producing different results

    Why have my f keys suddenly - middle of workday - started producing different results? The f11 key has changed from increasing sound volume to showing Dashboard. Also, everything I do now produces a sound effect. All my email pages now have black borders. All I have done to the system is to download new ITUNES software. Any help greatly appreciated. I am on an iMac 8.1: 10.5.5.

    Go to:
    http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=235
    Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE lundi 6 octobre 2008 13:36:29)

  • SQL Query produces different results when inserting into a table

    I have an SQL query which produces different results when run as a simple query to when it is run as an INSERT INTO table SELECT ...
    The query is:
    SELECT   mhldr.account_number
    ,        NVL(MAX(DECODE(ap.party_sysid, mhldr.party_sysid,ap.empcat_code,NULL)),'UNKNWN') main_borrower_status
    ,        COUNT(1) num_apps
    FROM     app_parties ap
    SELECT   accsta.account_number
    ,        actply.party_sysid
    ,        RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY actply.table_sysid, actply.loanac_latype_code ORDER BY start_date, SYSID) ranking
    FROM     activity_players actply
    ,        account_status accsta
    WHERE    1 = 1
    AND      actply.table_id (+) = 'ACCGRP'
    AND      actply.acttyp_code (+) = 'MHLDRM'
    AND      NVL(actply.loanac_latype_code (+),TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))
    AND      actply.table_sysid (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,1,8))
    ) mhldr
    WHERE    1 = 1
    AND      ap.lenapp_account_number (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(mhldr.account_number,1,8))
    GROUP BY mhldr.account_number;      The INSERT INTO code:
    TRUNCATE TABLE applicant_summary;
    INSERT /*+ APPEND */
    INTO     applicant_summary
    (  account_number
    ,  main_borrower_status
    ,  num_apps
    SELECT   mhldr.account_number
    ,        NVL(MAX(DECODE(ap.party_sysid, mhldr.party_sysid,ap.empcat_code,NULL)),'UNKNWN') main_borrower_status
    ,        COUNT(1) num_apps
    FROM     app_parties ap
    SELECT   accsta.account_number
    ,        actply.party_sysid
    ,        RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY actply.table_sysid, actply.loanac_latype_code ORDER BY start_date, SYSID) ranking
    FROM     activity_players actply
    ,        account_status accsta
    WHERE    1 = 1
    AND      actply.table_id (+) = 'ACCGRP'
    AND      actply.acttyp_code (+) = 'MHLDRM'
    AND      NVL(actply.loanac_latype_code (+),TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))
    AND      actply.table_sysid (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,1,8))
    ) mhldr
    WHERE    1 = 1
    AND      ap.lenapp_account_number (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(mhldr.account_number,1,8))
    GROUP BY mhldr.account_number;      When run as a query, this code consistently returns 2 for the num_apps field (for a certain group of accounts), but when run as an INSERT INTO command, the num_apps field is logged as 1. I have secured the tables used within the query to ensure that nothing is changing the data in the underlying tables.
    If I run the query as a cursor for loop with an insert into the applicant_summary table within the loop, I get the same results in the table as I get when I run as a stand alone query.
    I would appreciate any suggestions for what could be causing this odd behaviour.
    Cheers,
    Steve
    Oracle database details:
    Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
    CORE 10.2.0.2.0 Production
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
    Edited by: stevensutcliffe on Oct 10, 2008 5:26 AM
    Edited by: stevensutcliffe on Oct 10, 2008 5:27 AM

    stevensutcliffe wrote:
    Yes, using COUNT(*) gives the same result as COUNT(1).
    I have found another example of this kind of behaviour:
    Running the following INSERT statements produce different values for the total_amount_invested and num_records fields. It appears that adding the additional aggregation (MAX(amount_invested)) is causing problems with the other aggregated values.
    Again, I have ensured that the source data and destination tables are not being accessed / changed by any other processes or users. Is this potentially a bug in Oracle?Just as a side note, these are not INSERT statements but CTAS statements.
    The only non-bug explanation for this behaviour would be a potential query rewrite happening only under particular circumstances (but not always) in the lower integrity modes "trusted" or "stale_tolerated". So if you're not aware of any corresponding materialized views, your QUERY_REWRITE_INTEGRITY parameter is set to the default of "enforced" and your explain plan doesn't show any "MAT_VIEW REWRITE ACCESS" lines, I would consider this as a bug.
    Since you're running on 10.2.0.2 it's not unlikely that you hit one of the various "wrong result" bugs that exist(ed) in Oracle. I'm aware of a particular one I've hit in 10.2.0.2 when performing a parallel NESTED LOOP ANTI operation which returned wrong results, but only in parallel execution. Serial execution was showing the correct results.
    If you're performing parallel ddl/dml/query operations, try to do the same in serial execution to check if it is related to the parallel feature.
    You could also test if omitting the "APPEND" hint changes anything but still these are just workarounds for a buggy behaviour.
    I suggest to consider installing the latest patch set 10.2.0.4 but this requires thorough testing because there were (more or less) subtle changes/bugs introduced with [10.2.0.3|http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2008/02/nasty-bug-introduced-with-patch-set.html] and [10.2.0.4|http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2008/04/overview-of-new-and-changed-features-in.html].
    You could also open a SR with Oracle and clarify if there is already a one-off patch available for your 10.2.0.2 platform release. If not it's quite unlikely that you are going to get a backport for 10.2.0.2.
    Regards,
    Randolf
    Oracle related stuff blog:
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
    SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

  • Apple Hardware Test (MacPro) result codes

    Hello, My MacPro has been doing the wierdest things like freezing up, although the mouse will move. Freezes while monitors are sleeping. Freezes when I move mouse towards dock. Freezes for no apparent reason ... all updates have been performed.
    Bright idea tonight, I decided to run the Apple Hardware Test provided on my install disks ... I got an error code "4SNS/1/40000001:VMBS". No idea what it is or means and have searched high and low on the internet for result codes.
    Does anyone know what this means?
    I have been supicious of my ATi Radeon X1900 XT for some time as there have been artifacts and odd colour shifts and graphic anomalies.
    Thanks for your help, all is appreciated.

    apple hasn't released a key to the public as to what the hardware codes mean.  you really need to take it in for diagnosis.

  • EMac optical drive: Reads but ceased writing.  I get "Sense key=MEDIUM ERROR, Sense Code=0x0C, WRITE ERROR.  Drive is Pioneer DVD-RW DVR-127D.

    eMac optical drive: reads fine but has ceased writing.  One day it's working fine, burning DVDs, then after repeated attempts stops copying and gives the following error message:  "Sense key=MEDIUM ERROR, Sense Code=0x0C, WRITE ERROR".  Drive is Pioneer DVD-RW DVR-127D.  Is this a software issue or is the drive half dead?  Get the same result with either Popcorn or Toast 10.

    Are you using Roxio Toast? That error seems to be discussed a lot in the Roxio forums. Scroll down this thread:
    http://forums.support.roxio.com/topic/1686-the-drive-reported-an-error-sense-key medium-error-etc/
    and you'll find a step-by-step troubleshooting scheme.

  • EXS 24 Logical end-of-file reached during read operation Result code = -39

    EXS kit Trip Hop Remix will not completely load. Upon trying to load it I get the error, Logical end-of-file reached during read operation Result code = -39. The kit ends up lacking samples. It worked at one time but now it will not load up. To try and fix I extracted two kits with the same name but oddly they are slightly different sizes and have different creation dates, one 2004 the other 2007 hmmm (one goes in Garage band for remix tools the other gets placed in 02 Electronic Drum kits) from the install disks using Pacifist hoping to replace corrupted files. NG. I also reinstalled all the samples from the LP8 install disk, still NG. Anybody have a solution. THanks.

    To further clarify, the samples are all located in the folder Garage band/.../.../.../Sampler Files/Treated Percussion Sets/Perc-DnB+Triphop. They are used in the EXS24 Trip Hop Remix kit.exs. The 3 samples that seem to be causing the error are, YT2BGLRHTX02_3ue.aif, YT2BGLRHTX03_3ue.aif, YT2BGLRHTX04_3ue.aif. The kit is useless and my song is screwed up now that the kit will not load. Any ideas for a fix out there ?

  • Error: Logical end-of-file reached during read operation. Result Code = -39

    Hello all,
    Recently, I have been suddenly getting this error message:
    "Logical end-of-file reached during read operation. Result Code = -39."
    In my case, when it does come up, it always pops up during the recording of an audio take. Almost immediately after hitting the stop button, this error message would pop up. And then when I go to check the take that was just recorded, there is nothing but shrieking noise. As a result, this pop up error trashes any good take I may have had. It's unpredictable as to when this error decides to pop up as well. So now, when I record, I tend to just have my fingers crossed and hope that this error doesn't pop up especially right after recording a good take!
    To no avail, I have tried different I/O buffer settings, repaired permissions, rebooted, and even re-formatted my recording hard disk.
    Could this be a possible hint that my hard disk is about to physically collapse? I have had it for about 2 years. Could it be some sort of bug in Logic? Or something else perhaps?
    Appreciate any feedback! Thanks a lot!

    DamonGrant wrote:
    Thanks for those suggestions Erik...
    It's been happening for a month I guess and I don't think that anything new's been installed. I will try recording to the start up disc and to maybe to some USB discs I have.
    It seems to happen after working on a project for some time.
    After say tracking takes for 45 mins or so. Maybe it's just coincidence, but do you think that might indicate a hardware issue?
    Now there might be a clue. What happens when you then quit Logic, reboot your Mac, and reopen the active session? It might be that your disk has become a bit messy from all the traffic, and it just needs to 'settle' in OS X again. Click on the *Spotlight icon* top right of your screen and see if any indexing is taking place. Wait for it to finish before launching Logic.
    Alternatively, you could exclude your recording disk from Spotlight indexing alltogether, by dragging the disk to the Privacy field in the Spotlight Sysprefpane.
    One other thing to do: turn off Journaling , using *Disk Utility.* Select your recording volume in Disk Utility, hold the alt key while dropping down the File menu. Choose *Disable Journaling.*
    On the other hand, it might also point to a RAM issue. Do you ever suffer Kernel panics (=the darkening 'curtain' and the message "You need to restart your Mac... etc")? or 'unexplained' crashes? If not or very rarely, I'ld rule out a RAM issue. If daily, it could be. What you can try in this case is to turn of your Mac and physically take out and reinsert your RAM.
    And when you trash (=eject/unmount), physically disconnect and reconnect your recording disk? Does that help? (Logic should not be running when you do this)

  • Old outer join syntax produces different results from new syntax!

    I have inherited a query that uses the old outer join syntax but that is yielding correct results. When I translate it to the new outer join syntax, I get the results I expect, but they are not correct! And I don't understand why the old syntax produces the results it produces. Bottom line: I want the results I'm getting from the old syntax, but I need it in the new syntax (I'm putting it into Reporting Services, and RS automatically converts old syntax to new).
    Here's the query with the old outer join syntax that is working correctly:
    Code Snippet
    SELECT   TE = COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID),
             UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID),
             PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID)) / 
                  CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID))
    FROM     TABLE T1, TABLE T2
    WHERE    T1 *= T2
    In this query, much to my surprise, TE <> UE and PE <> 1. However, TE, UE, and PE seem to be accurate!
    Here's the query with the new outer join syntax that is working but not producing the results I need:
    Code Snippet
    SELECT   TE = COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID),
             UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID),
             PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID)) / 
                  CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID))
    FROM     TABLE T1 LEFT OUTER JOIN TABLE T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID
    Though not producing the results I need, it is producing what would be expected: TE = UE and PE = 1.
    My questions:
    1) Can someone who is familiar enough with the old syntax please help me understand why TE <> UE and PE <> 1 in the first query?
    2) Can someone please tell me how to properly translate the first query to the new syntax so that it continues to produce the results in the first query?
    Thank you very much.

    How can we reproduce the issue?
    Code Snippet
    USE [master]
    GO
    EXEC sp_dbcmptlevel Northwind, 80
    GO
    USE [Northwind]
    GO
    SELECT
    TE
    = COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID),
    UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID),
    PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID)) /
    CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID))
    FROM
    dbo
    .Orders T1, dbo.Orders T2
    WHERE
    T1
    .OrderID *= T2.OrderID
    SELECT
    TE
    = COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID),
    UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID),
    PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID)) /
    CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID))
    FROM
    dbo
    .Orders T1
    LEFT OUTER JOIN
    dbo.Orders T2
    ON T1.OrderID = T2.OrderID
    GO
    EXEC sp_dbcmptlevel Northwind, 90
    GO
    Result:
    TE
    UE
    PE
    830
    830
    1.00
    TE
    UE
    PE
    830
    830
    1.00
    As you can see, I am getting same results.
    AMB

  • I/O error result code= -36 ???? Please help!!

    Im running studio with apogee duet, just got the apple care (god bless it) superdrive replacement, now I get audio input output functioning realtime, but *** soon as I attempt to record the error pops up. I cant find anyone else with this problem, and apogee unfortunately was clueless. I find it strange that an I/O error is occurring when I pass audio in/out no problem. It blasts the error as soon as I press that quick key R.
    I'm running ProTools8 in the meantime on a MBox and it feels so inadequate/fake/unprofessional/. Show me why it was a good thing apple bought out E-Magic fellas!!!
    P.S. where do you guy get the definitions of these codes?

    I have never experienced that error, but I Googled "I/O Error: Result Code=-36" and found this...
    It really has nothing to do with Logic. It is a Mac OSX error being passed on
    by Logic. It has to do with not being able to write to the drive. You can
    get this error in Logic if your recording drive is too full, is too
    fragmented, or the directory is messed up.
    Some things you can do to solve the problem are: Make sure you are recording
    to a drive other then the system drive, make sure you have plenty of free
    space on the recording drive, repair permissions, defrag the recording
    drive, or run a disk utility like Disk Warrior to check and repair directory
    issues.
    Hans
    here is the link to that ...
    http://logic-users.org/forums/LUG/thread/81375

  • SQL job running DTEXEC.EXE via PowerShell step produces wrong characters in result tables. Running the same DTEXEC.EXE in PowerShell x86 window produces correct results.

    I've created a package in SSDT (Visual Studio 2012) to import DBF tables into MSSQL 2014 via a wizard.
    Source DBF files contain tables with Russian (Cyrillic) characters in records fields.
    Created package works fine, produces correct results (imports Cyrillic characters as needed) while:
    •debugging in VS2012
    •deploying package in SSISDB and running the package via PowerShell x86:
    &"c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\120\DTS\Binn\DTExec.exe" /Server "server\mssql2014" /ISServer "\SSISDB\import\Integration Services Project16\Package1.dtsx";
    But when I create a SQL Agent job with a single PowerShell step that contains the same command and run the job it produces wrong characters in resulting tables. So, the problem is in wrong code page (or encoding). The correct tables with records are
    produced and job runs without errors.
    I tried
    chcp 1251; # 855, 866 -- all of them
    &"c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\120\DTS\Binn\DTExec.exe" /Server "server\mssql2014" /ISServer "\SSISDB\import\Integration Services Project16\Package1.dtsx";
    in SQL Agent PowerShell step, but with no positive result.
    Anyone encountered such a behavior? How to fix it?
    v

    What if you run this package without PowerShell?
    Arthur My Blog

  • Example programs producing unexpected results

    I have a machine running RHEL 6 with the kernel driver and a PCIe-6321 connected to a BNC-2120.  I'm trying to run the example programs as a sanity check that everything is fine before going forward.  When I run dioex1, it claims to write then read 0x5A on port 0.  However, the LEDs (labeled P0.0 through P0.7) do not turn on as expected.  When I run aiex1, it appears that I'm just getting background noise.  Am I missing something?
    Running boardBringup produces sensible results.

    My apologies.  I was looking at the wrong infoobject.  Different portions of the incoming field are used to populate different infoobjects.
    In fact, the transfer routine I gave above is not the one that was producing the problem.  Here's the one that was producing the problem:
      IF strlen( TRAN_STRUCTURE-/BIC/BNSN_LMR ) eq 15.
        RESULT = TRAN_STRUCTURE-/BIC/BNSN_LMR+13(2).
      endif.
    This rule is used when assigning a value to a two position character infoobject.  When this code is applied to the value ''3 00675 03807 1' it picks off the last two positions, which are a blank and a 1.  Without the ALPHA conversion routine running on the receiving infoobject, the leading blank is discarded, and the resulting value does not conform.
    I enabled the conversion routine on the receiving infoobject and this solved the problem.
    Thanks Olivier!

  • Filter expression producing different results after upgrade to 11.1.1.7

    Hello,
    We recently did an upgrade and noticed that on a number of reports where we're using the FILTER expression that the numbers are very inflated. Where we are not using the FILTER expression the numbers are as expected. In the example below we ran the 'Bookings' report in 10g and came up with one number and ran the same report in 11g (11.1.1.7.0) after the upgrade and got two different results. The data source is the same database for each envrionment. Also, in running the physical SQL generated by the 10g and 11g version of the report we get different the inflated numbers from the 11g SQL. Any ideas on what might be happening or causing the issue?
    10g report: 2016-Q3......Bookings..........72,017
    11g report: 2016-Q3......Bookings..........239,659
    This is the simple FILTER expression that is being used in the column formula on the report itself for this particular scenario which produces different results in 10g and 11g.
    FILTER("Fact - Opportunities"."Won Opportunity Amount" USING ("Opportunity Attributes"."Business Type" = 'New Business'))
    -------------- Physical SQL created by 10g report -------- results as expected --------------------------------------------
    WITH
    SAWITH0 AS (select sum(case when T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS = 'Won-closed' then T33231.USD_LINE_AMOUNT else 0 end ) as c1,
    T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME as c2,
    T28761.QUARTER_RANK as c3
    from
    XXFI.XXFI_GL_FISCAL_MONTHS_V T28761 /* Dim_Periods */ ,
    XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_HEADER_ACCUM T33142 /* Fact_Opportunity_Headers(CloseDate) */ ,
    XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_LINE_ACCUM T33231 /* Fact_Opportunity_Lines(CloseDate) */
    where ( T28761.PERIOD_NAME = T33142.CLOSE_PERIOD_NAME and T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME = '2012-Q3' and T33142.LEAD_ID = T33231.LEAD_ID and T33231.LINES_BUSINESS_TYPE = 'New Business' and T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS <> 'Duplicate' )
    group by T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME, T28761.QUARTER_RANK)
    select distinct SAWITH0.c2 as c1,
    'Bookings10g' as c2,
    SAWITH0.c1 as c3,
    SAWITH0.c3 as c5,
    SAWITH0.c1 as c7
    from
    SAWITH0
    order by c1, c5
    -------------- Physical SQL created by the same report as above but in 11g (11.1.1.7.0) -------- results much higher --------------------------------------------
    WITH
    SAWITH0 AS (select sum(case when T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS = 'Won-closed' then T33142.TOTAL_OPPORTUNITY_AMOUNT_USD else 0 end ) as c1,
    T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME as c2,
    T28761.QUARTER_RANK as c3
    from
    XXFI.XXFI_GL_FISCAL_MONTHS_V T28761 /* Dim_Periods */ ,
    XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_HEADER_ACCUM T33142 /* Fact_Opportunity_Headers(CloseDate) */ ,
    XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_LINE_ACCUM T33231 /* Fact_Opportunity_Lines(CloseDate) */
    where ( T28761.PERIOD_NAME = T33142.CLOSE_PERIOD_NAME and T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME = '2012-Q3' and T33142.LEAD_ID = T33231.LEAD_ID and T33231.LINES_BUSINESS_TYPE = 'New Business' and T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS <> 'Duplicate' )
    group by T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME, T28761.QUARTER_RANK),
    SAWITH1 AS (select distinct 0 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    'Bookings2' as c3,
    D1.c3 as c4,
    D1.c1 as c5
    from
    SAWITH0 D1),
    SAWITH2 AS (select D1.c1 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c4 as c4,
    D1.c5 as c5,
    sum(D1.c5) as c6
    from
    SAWITH1 D1
    group by D1.c1, D1.c2, D1.c3, D1.c4, D1.c5)
    select D1.c1 as c1, D1.c2 as c2, D1.c3 as c3, D1.c4 as c4, D1.c5 as c5, D1.c6 as c6 from ( select D1.c1 as c1,
    D1.c2 as c2,
    D1.c3 as c3,
    D1.c4 as c4,
    D1.c5 as c5,
    sum(D1.c6) over () as c6
    from
    SAWITH2 D1
    order by c1, c4, c3 ) D1 where rownum <= 2000001
    Thank you,
    Mike
    Edited by: Mike Jelen on Jun 7, 2013 2:05 PM

    Thank you for the info. They are definitely different values since ones on the header and the other is on the lines. As the "Won Opportunity" logical column is mapped to multiple LTS it appears the OBI 11 uses a different alogorthim to determine the most efficient table to use in the query generation vs 10g. I'll need to spend some time researching the impact to adding a 'sort' to the LTS. I'm hoping that there's a way to get OBI to use similar logic relative to 10g in how it generated the table priority.
    Thx again,
    Mike

  • "Error Result code = -43" AND "Audio file not found"

    In Garageband I was trying to  click Join, but kept getting "Error Result code = -43"
    What does this mean?
    Also, I thought saving the file and restarting Garageband would help, but upon re-opening the program BIG problem: the file (just this one, others are opening fine) has this error message upon opening "Audio file “07 I See the Light.aif” not found!"

    mcgregorsgal wrote:
    so do I have to basically start over?
    for that one recording, it looks like it.
    the error -43 is a system level error, so i HIGHLY doubt this will help, however you can ctrl-click the project file, choose Show Package Contents, open the media folder and preview any audio files in there to see if the missing file is there, but in all likelihood, you will need to re-record it

  • My keyboard on macbook pro (laptop) is acting weird. One key is not responding at all. Have verified using Keyboard viewer and some other keys are printing the unresponsive character at random.

    my keyboard on macbook pro (laptop) is acting weird. One key is not responding at all. Have verified using Keyboard viewer and some other keys are printing the unresponsive character at random. "z" is the unresponsive character.
    Is it a damaged keyboard ?
    The laptop is just 2 months old, will Apple replace it with a new one if its indeed a damaged keyboard or just repair, I use it for official purposes so being without a laptop is not much of an option.

    No one here works for Apple, so we don't know what Apple might or might not do.  If it's a genuine defect, they will of course repair it under warranty.  It is not their responsibility if it effects your ability to work or not, so that's on you.
    If, however, they determine that the key is problematic as a result of your misuse of the laptop, then everything is on you.  And trust me, if they find a glob of dried up beer or coffee there, they will charge you.
    Your only choice is to take it in for repair.

  • The document could not be saved. The server said: "The operation failed because an unexpected error occurred. (Result code 0×80020005)" Please ensure you have completed all required properties with the correct information and try again.

    I am having problems  saving documents back to SharePoint when any of the document properties (metadata columns) are set to be "managed metadata". The check-in/save fails with error:
    The document could not be saved. The server said:
    “The operation failed because an unexpected error occurred. (Result code 0×80020005)”
    Please ensure you have completed all required properties with the correct information and try again.
    I have seen similar threads that suggest this is a known issue with this version of Acrobat but I would like conformation from Adobe that this is a known issue and whether it is fixed in a newer version?
    Adobe Acrobat version 10.1.13
    SharePoint 2010

    Hi quodd,,
    We are sorry for the issue being faced by you. I need some information from you so that I take further steps:
    1. Which Adobe product are you using Acrobat or Adobe reader- what is the complete version?
    2. How are you opening and saving the PDF, the exact workflow?
         Are you doing it from within Adobe Reader/Acrobat application or opening it from browser, doing changes and saving it using browser itself.
    3. Can you try to save a PDF to library with Custom template and managed metadata columns using browser directly.
    4. Please verify that columns name do not contain spaces or some other special characters.
       Can you try to save PDF to library with Custom template and just a single managed metadata column  with a simple name
    Thanks,
    Nikhil Gupta

Maybe you are looking for