Spatial query inside the exists clause return ora-13226

The following does not work:
select b.state, b.county from counties b where exists
(select 's' from states a where a.state = 'New Jersey'
and mdsys.sdo_relate (b.geom, a.geom, 'mask=INSIDE querytype=WINDOW' ) = 'TRUE');
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-13226: interface not supported without a spatial index
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.MD", line 1723
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.MDERR", line 8
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_3GL", line 302
ORA-06512: at line 1
The following does work:
select b.* from states a,
counties b where a.state = 'New Jersey'
and mdsys.sdo_relate (b.geom, a.geom, 'mask=INSIDE querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE';
I found bug 1243095 telling that this is not a bug but a limitation of the spatial operator. It cannot be invoked on a table that is not spatially indexed. In fact, the table is indexed but oracle cannot find the spatial index because table b(counties) is declared outside the EXISTS clause.
In my case, I use object table. I cannot use the workaround specified above because I should use the DISTINCT clause but I cannot define the MAP and ORDER function (this is a general query).
I've found another workaround :
select b.state, b.county from counties b where exists
(select 's' from states a where a.state = 'New Jersey'
and mdsys.sdo_relate (a.geom, b.geom, 'mask=CONTAINS querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE');
but sdo_relate still doesn't use the spatial index of table b (even if I specify it explicitely in the operator) and the query is very slow (more than 15 minutes).
Is there a better workaround ?

OK but I work in object model.
And if I don't use the EXISTS clause, I must use the distinct clause.(I used the exists because of that)
If I will to retrieve all the country that have at least a state beginning with the C letter, I will wrote :
select c.* from country c, table(c.states) s where s.column_value.name like 'C%';
(It is a simplified request to express the problem)
In this case, I must use the distinct clause to select one occurence of each country objet (one country may contains more than one state beginning with C).
select distinct c.* from country c, table(c.states) s where s.column_value.name like 'C%';
For that, I must define a MAP or ORDER function for EACH type used in the country object.
My first question is : I must retrieve all different country objects. Why the request doesn't use the MAP or ORDER function of the country type to distinct them ? Is there another syntax (or a hint) to express that ?
In this case, it will make an ORA-00932 : incoherent datatype because the type of the nested table column cannot contain map or order method.
Any suggestion ?
Thanks in advance.

Similar Messages

  • Query in the where clause is not allowed

    Hi all,
    I have a table m_vehicle that stores 1 or more than 1 rows of data for each person. But the partner's schema requires that 0 or 1 vehicle license plate data be sent with the xml file. I have the following nested select statement inside a bigger one and it does not work,
    select xmlelement("VehicleLicensePlate",
         (case when mv.lic_plate_state is not null then
              xmlelement("PlateState", mv.lic_plate_state)
         end), -- end of plate state
         (case when mv.lic_plate_no is not null then
              xmlelement("PlateNumber", xmlelement("ID", mv.lic_plate_no))
         end),
         (case when mv.lic_plate_year is not null then
              xmlelement("PlateExpiryYear", mv.lic_plate_year)                                                  
         end)
         ).extract('/*')
    from m_vehicle mv where mv.mni_id = 1083650
    and mv.seq_no = (select max(mv2.seq_no) from m_vehicle mv2
    where mv2.mni_id = mv.mni_id) and mv.lic_plate_no is not null
    But it works when I run it alone and gets the latest row for the person. It does not work either if I join this table with other tables. My root element select is from dual because I have to supply lots of SOAP and other artifacts in the xml. Is it because I have this root select from dual that the query in the where clause does not work? How do I make it work so that I get 0 or one row only from the table? My solution was to write a function that returns each part of the license plate data using dymanic sql and call it in the xmlelement function. It works but I would like to use plain sql instead.
    Thanks.
    Ben

    By the way, the error I get is this,
    ERROR:
    ORA-31011: XML parsing failed
    ORA-19202: Error occurred in XML processing
    LPX-00216: invalid character 3 (0x3)
    Error at line 1
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 111
    Ben

  • Not able to migrate a query with not exist clause

    Hi all,
    I'm using Toplink 10.1.3 and I am trying to rewrite the following query with Expression Framework:
    select distinct r.e_ogg_oper_k_oggetto
    FROM regola_accettazione_oper_banc r, oggetto_operazione_bancaria o
    where not exists (
    select 1
    FROM limitaz_ogg_tipo_oper_banc l
    where nvl(l.d_fine_validita,trunc(sysdate)+1)>trunc(sysdate)
    and l.d_inizio_validita <= trunc(sysdate)
    and l.e_tpodv_k_tipo_operazione=:appoggio.tipo_operaz
    and l.e_ogg_oper_k_oggetto=r.e_ogg_oper_k_oggetto
    and l.e_uni_oper_k_unita_oper_util= :appoggio.e_uni_oper_k_unita_oper_esegui )
    and r.e_oper_ban_k_operaz_bancaria=:appoggio.form
    and r.e_ogg_oper_k_oggetto=o.k_oggetto
    and o.e_ogg_oper_k_oggetto is null
    and o.k_oggetto != nvl(:appoggio.oggetto_autom,,'0')
    and o.k_oggetto like substr(:appoggio.oggetto,1,2)||'%'
    and r.d_inizio_validita <= :appoggio.d_contab
    and to_date(nvl(to_char(r.d_fine_validita,DD/MM/YYYY'),31/12/3999'),'DD/MM/YYYY')> :appoggio.d_contab
    and o.f_natura_oggetto in ('G','P') and r.f_oggetto_automatizzato!='S'
    I'm not able to "attach" the not exist clause to the rest of query.
    How can I do it?
    Thank you very much.

    Not exists can be used in an expression through using a ReportQuery sub-query.
    i.e.
    ExpressionBuilder outerBuilder = new ExpressionBuilder();
    ReadAllQuery outerQuery = new ReadAllQuery(Employee.class, outerBuilder);
    ExpressionBuilder subBuilder = new ExpressionBuilder();
    ReportQuery subQuery = new ReportQuery(Address.class, subBuilder);
    subQuery.addAttribute("id");
    subQuery.setSelectionCriteria(
    subBuilder.get("city").equal(outerBuilder.get("address").get("city")
    .and(subBuilder.notEqual(outerBuilder.get("address")))));
    outerQuery.setSelectionCriteria(
    outerBuilder.notExists(subQuery));
    List results = (List) session.executeQuery(outerQuery);
    Refer to the documentation section on sub-queries for more information.
    I would suggest simlpifying the where clause until you get the sub-query working to start.
    You can also always use a custom SQL query in TopLink.

  • How to overwrite an inner query in the select clause

    Hello,
    I have a queryof this form:
    SELECT t1.ID,
               t1.column2,
               (SELECT SUM (t2.column2)
                    FROM table2 t2
                  WHERE t2 = t.ID
                       AND t2.column1 IN (SELECT ..... FROM table3 t3 WHERE t3.column1 = t1.column3 ........)
        FROM table1 t1At the stage where I select from table3 I do not see the columns of table1. In other words:
      t3.column1 = t1.column3will NOT work.
    The version of the database is 10.2.0.4.
    How could I rewrite this piece of code in order to surround the problem?
    I cannot join table3 with table1 in the outermost query, because the structure of this database is such that it would not work for me.
    I know that most of you would say, change the DB structure, but anyway, any ideas? :)
    Besides, is the same restriction for inner queries applicable in Oracle 11g2?
    Thanks

    user13080027 wrote:
    Hi
    I mean I receive the error ORA-00904-"t1.column3" invalid identifier.Something does not add up here. You said earlier
    I cannot join table3 with table1 in the outermost query, because the structure of this database is such that it would not work for me.Why can't you rewrite your query something like follows:
    SELECT t1.ID,
               t1.column2,
               (SELECT SUM (t2.column2)
                    FROM table2 t2
                  WHERE t2 = t.ID
                       AND t2.column1 = t3.column3
        FROM table1 t1, table3 t3
    WHERE t3.column1 = t1.column3p.s. I am not saying this is the exact query you need but then you don't provide any details requested. ;)

  • DECODE inside the WHERE clause

    Hello All:
    I can't get the DECODE statement to work inside my WHERE clause. I have read the information on
    tahiti.oracle.com
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17118/functions049.htm#i1017437
    But still can't get it working. Originally I had it working as dynamic SQL and then execute that string, but I am not allowed to use dynamic SQL and need to use "Real" PL/SQL.
    I have the following WHERE clause (more info after the WHERE clause)
    WHERE
         a.ebiz_asn_no(+) = te.ebiz_cntrl_no
         AND w.ebiz_work_no(+) = te.ebiz_cntrl_no
         AND o.ebiz_ord_no(+) = ebiz_cntrl_no
         AND t.ebiz_trailer_no(+) = te.ebiz_trailer_no
         AND ms.ebiz_sku_no(+) = te.ebiz_sku_no
         AND NVL(ms.ebiz_sku_no, -1) = NVL(p_SKU, nvl(ms.ebiz_sku_no, -1))
         AND tl.ebiz_lp_no(+) = te.ebiz_lp_no
         AND NVL(te.ebiz_lp_no, -1) = NVL(p_LP, nvl(te.ebiz_lp_no, -1))
         AND eu.ebiz_user_no(+) = te.act_ebiz_user_no
         AND NVL(te.act_ebiz_user_no, -1) = NVL(p_UserID, NVL(te.act_ebiz_user_no, -1))
         AND NVL(te.begin_location, '~') = NVL(p_BeginLocation, NVL(te.begin_location, '~'))
         AND NVL(te.end_location, '~') = NVL(p_EndLocation, NVL(te.end_location, '~'))
         AND te.comp_id = p_CompID
         AND te.site_id = p_SiteID
         AND INSTR('' || p_TaskType || '', te.task_type) > 0
         AND NVL(task_priority, -1) = NVL(p_Priority, NVL(task_priority, -1))
         AND NVL(te.ebiz_cntrl_no, -1) = DECODE(te.task_type, 'IULD', DECODE(p_Order, null, te.ebiz_cntrl_no, ebiz_po2asn.get_ebiz_po_no(p_Order)), NVL(p_Order, NVL
                           (te.ebiz_cntrl_no,-1)))
         AND NVL(te.batch_no,'~') = NVL(p_Batch, NVL(te.batch_no, '~'))
         AND NVL(te.ebiz_wave_no, -1) = NVL(p_Wave, NVL(te.ebiz_wave_no, -1))
         || whereClauseStatus
         || whereClauseFromDate
         || whereClauseToDate;As you can see, originally I was appending values of "whereClauseStatus, whereClauseFromDate, whereClauseToDate" and this was set with the following PL/SQL code:
         IF(p_TaskStatus = 'C') THEN
              --     Set From Date Clause
              IF(p_FromShipDate IS NOT NULL) THEN
                   whereClauseFromDate := ' AND TRUNC(te.act_end_date) >= TO_DATE(''' || p_FromShipDate || ''',''MM/dd/yyyy'') ';
              END IF;
              --     Set To Date Clause
              IF (p_ToShipDate IS NOT NULL) THEN
                   whereClauseToDate := ' AND TRUNC(te.act_end_date) <= TO_DATE(''' || p_ToShipDate || ''',''MM/dd/yyyy'') ';
              END IF;
         ELSE
              --     Incomplete and All statuses are filtered on the currdate
              --     Set From Date Clause
              IF(p_FromShipDate IS NOT NULL) THEN
                   whereClauseFromDate := ' AND TRUNC(te.currdate) >= TO_DATE(''' || p_FromShipDate || ''',''MM/dd/yyyy'') ';
              END IF;
              --     Set To Date Clause
              IF (p_ToShipDate IS NOT NULL) THEN
                   whereClauseToDate := ' AND TRUNC(te.currdate) <= TO_DATE(''' || p_ToShipDate || ''',''MM/dd/yyyy'') ';
              END IF;
         END IF;
         IF (p_TaskStatus = 'I') THEN
              whereClauseStatus := ' AND act_end_date IS NULL ';
         ELSIF (p_TaskStatus = 'C') THEN
              whereClauseStatus := ' AND act_end_date IS NOT NULL ';
         ELSE
              whereClauseStatus := '';
         END IF;I am having serious issues getting the DECODE statement to replace the three appended variables.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Andy
    Edited by: BluShadow on 02-Aug-2011 15:11
    added {noformat}{noformat} tags for clarity. Please read {message:id=9360002} and learn to do this yourself.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

    I'm going to take a wild stab in the dark and suggest that this may be what you are looking for...
    WHERE
         a.ebiz_asn_no(+) = te.ebiz_cntrl_no
         AND w.ebiz_work_no(+) = te.ebiz_cntrl_no
         AND o.ebiz_ord_no(+) = ebiz_cntrl_no
         AND t.ebiz_trailer_no(+) = te.ebiz_trailer_no
         AND ms.ebiz_sku_no(+) = te.ebiz_sku_no
         AND NVL(ms.ebiz_sku_no, -1) = NVL(p_SKU, nvl(ms.ebiz_sku_no, -1))
         AND tl.ebiz_lp_no(+) = te.ebiz_lp_no
         AND NVL(te.ebiz_lp_no, -1) = NVL(p_LP, nvl(te.ebiz_lp_no, -1))
         AND eu.ebiz_user_no(+) = te.act_ebiz_user_no
         AND NVL(te.act_ebiz_user_no, -1) = NVL(p_UserID, NVL(te.act_ebiz_user_no, -1))
         AND NVL(te.begin_location, '~') = NVL(p_BeginLocation, NVL(te.begin_location, '~'))
         AND NVL(te.end_location, '~') = NVL(p_EndLocation, NVL(te.end_location, '~'))
         AND te.comp_id = p_CompID
         AND te.site_id = p_SiteID
         AND INSTR('' || p_TaskType || '', te.task_type) > 0
         AND NVL(task_priority, -1) = NVL(p_Priority, NVL(task_priority, -1))
         AND NVL(te.ebiz_cntrl_no, -1) = DECODE(te.task_type, 'IULD', DECODE(p_Order, null, te.ebiz_cntrl_no, ebiz_po2asn.get_ebiz_po_no(p_Order)), NVL(p_Order, NVL
                           (te.ebiz_cntrl_no,-1)))
         AND NVL(te.batch_no,'~') = NVL(p_Batch, NVL(te.batch_no, '~'))
         AND NVL(te.ebiz_wave_no, -1) = NVL(p_Wave, NVL(te.ebiz_wave_no, -1))
         AND TRUNC(te.act_end_date) >= NVL(TO_DATE(p_FromShipDate,'MM/dd/yyyy'),TRUNC(te.act_end_date))
            AND TRUNC(te.act_end_date) <= NVL(TO_DATE(p_ToShipDate,'MM/dd/yyyy'),TRUNC(tw.act_end_date))
            AND TRUNC(te.currdate) >= NVL(TO_DATE(p_FromShipDate,'MM/dd/yyyy'),TRUNC(te.currdate))
         AND TRUNC(te.currdate) <= NVL(TO_DATE(p_ToShipDate,'MM/dd/yyyy'),TRUNC(te.currdate))
            AND (  (act_end_date IS NULL AND p_TaskStatus = 'I')
                OR (act_end_date IS NOT NULL AND p_TaskStatus = 'C')
                OR p_TaskStatus NOT IN ('I','C')
                )Edited by: BluShadow on 02-Aug-2011 16:27
    missed the last clause. oops.

  • Set_block_property does not called the query from the where clause

    Hi all,
    I have two blocks in the Oracle form 6i. Master link with the detail. Because of the data is quite huge if I have the auto query when the form is loaded hence I have two enter parameter created of From_date and To_date together with button to execute the query when that two parameter is being filled.
    I have the following quotes in the button of when-button-pressed :-
    BEGIN
    set_block_property('act_vw_sale_comm', default_where, 'invh_dt >='''|| to_date(:act_vw_sale_comm.fdate,'dd/mm/yyyy') ||''' and invh_dt <= ''' || to_date(:act_vw_sale_comm.tdate,'dd/mm/yyyy')||'');
    go_block('act_vw_sale_comm');
    execute_query;
    set_block_property('act_vw_sale_comm', default_where, '');
    END;
    However, nothing being displayed when I click on the button. Anything wrong on the above statement ? Please help me. thanks.
    Rgds
    Lim

    BEGIN
    go_block('act_vw_sale_comm');
    set_block_property('act_vw_sale_comm', default_where, 'invh_dt >= '''|| :FDATE ||''''' AND invh_dt <= '''|| :TDATE ||'''');
    execute_query;
    --set_block_property('act_vw_sale_comm', default_where, '');
    END;
    Now, I have the above statement, but still the same when try to execute the query, this time, the screen execute but does not show anything and close my form straight away. Why!
    Anyone can help me?
    Thanks
    Lim

  • How can I access user defined column(in query) inside the trigger?

    Hi
    I have 3 unions and each query displays different records on some criteria. I also have a column hard-coded
    Ex:
    select a.col1, a.col2,
    add as update
    from table1 a
    where ...
    union
    select a.col1, a.col2,
    change as update
    from table1 a
    where ...
    union
    select a.col1, a.col2,
    del as update
    from table1 a
    where ...
    And I need to display a column in the report only if update is Add. I was thinking of writing a format trigger for that field. But I do not know how can I access this user defined column named update in the trigger?
    Any help?

    Try ":update" minus the double-quotes. Ex:
        IF :update = 'add' THEN
          RETURN(TRUE);
        ELSE
          RETURN FALSE;
        END IF;
    You'll want to place your hard-coded values in single-quotes. Ex:
        select a.col1, a.col2,
        'add' as update
    - Brian

  • Spatial query in a Distributed Database

    Y have 2 oracle dbs: db1 in machine 1 and db2 in machine 2.
    In machine 1 i have the tables and the index tables and in machine 2 i want make the spatial queries in these tables on machine 1. I make the grants to tables in machine 2. But when i execute the select, oracle returns:ORA-13226 interface not supported without a spatial index. But i created the indexes in machine 1. HElp-me, please!!!!
    Sory my english.

    In the real world, you wouldn't design a system where you maintained referential integrity between two databases owned by two different companies. You wouldn't want two organizations to have systems that were that tightly coupled. You might replicate reference data from one database to the local database and then declare integrity constraints between the replicated reference table and other tables in the system, but even that may be more tightly coupled than you'd normally want. The owner of the parent table, for example, would want to be able to delete records from the master after some retention period without worrying that some downstream database still had child records that referred to the parent. The owners of the parent table might also have lots of different downstream consumers and wouldn't want to have to write new code every time a new consumer came along.
    If you want to ignore multi-user issues, you could write relatively simplistic triggers. When you insert or update data into the child table, do a select against the parent table and throw an exception if no rows are found. When you delete data from the parent table, do a select against the child table and throw an exception if rows are found. If you want to handle the case of updating a primary key, you could do that as well. These triggers, though, would not work if there are multiple users modifying the tables simultaneously-- someone may have deleted a parent record in another session that isn't committed, for example, when your child table trigger reads the data.
    Justin

  • Ora-13226 when performing spatial query on view

    Hi,
    in my database I have a view with spatial column. The view is based on UNION ALL select. When I try to run spatial query on the view, the database returns ora-13226 error. When I recreate the view to consist only one select (without UNION ALL) the spatial query return correct result. Could you pls help me how to do a spatial query on spatial view whose definition contains UNION ALL select?
    Thanks
    Andrew

    Hi,
    it's quite simple:
    create view test_view as
    select id, geometry from table_a
    union all
    select id, geometry from table_b;
    When I try for example:
    select *
    from test_view
    where sdo_relate(geometry, (select geometry from table_c where id=1316),'mask=anyinteract') = 'TRUE';
    it throws ora-13226 error.
    Interesting is that following query where the geometry is directly included runs well:
    select *
    from test_view
    where sdo_relate(geometry, MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY (....),'mask=anyinteract') = 'TRUE';
    also when I recreate the test_view as
    create view test_view as
    select id, geometry from table_a;
    then also the first query (with inner select) returns no error.
    It's a little bit strange isn't it?
    Andrew

  • ORA-21700 Error when running C# stored procedure to do a spatial query

    Hi All
    I'm having trouble running a C# stored procedure that (via another object) that falls over running a spatial query with the following error.
    OAR-21700 object does not exist or is marked for delete
    If I take the sql of the spatial query out and run it separately in SqlPlus it runs as expected.
    If I use the object that executes the spatial query via NUnit (i.e. executed on the client, rather than the server) it also works as expected.
    Can anyone help? Is there some issue using Oracle Spatial queries with the Oracle Database Extensions for .NET?

    I can indeed. Here is a slightly simplified version:
    SELECT secondary_catch.mi_prinx AS primarykey
    FROM mapinfo_data.secondary_catch
    WHERE sdo_relate (secondary_catch.geoloc,
    (SELECT geoloc
    FROM training_6.building_polygons
    WHERE building_id = 10002507117),
    'mask=anyinteract querytype=WINDOW'
    ) = 'TRUE'
    Interestingly, if I attempt to run this query inside a C# stored procedure using the implicit context connection (i.e. OracleConnection.ConnectionString = "context connection=true") it fails with the error I described above.
    If however I create a new connection and connect as a regular user on my database, the query works correctly.
    So in that sense I have a workaround, but I'd like to avoid using it if I can as creating a new explicit connection is an overhead I can do without.

  • Why do i get ORA-03113 when doing a spatial query against union all view?

    Hi, i created the following view
    CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW cola_markets_v
    AS
      (SELECT mkt_id, NAME, shape shape_a, NULL shape_b, NULL shape_c,
              NULL shape_d
         FROM COLA_MARKETS
        WHERE NAME = 'cola_a')
       UNION ALL
      (SELECT mkt_id, NAME, NULL shape_a, shape shape_b, NULL shape_c,
              NULL shape_d
         FROM COLA_MARKETS
        WHERE NAME = 'cola_b')
       UNION ALL
      (SELECT mkt_id, NAME, NULL shape_a, NULL shape_b, shape shape_c,
              NULL shape_d
         FROM COLA_MARKETS
        WHERE NAME = 'cola_c')
       UNION ALL
      (SELECT mkt_id, NAME, NULL shape_a, NULL shape_b, NULL shape_c,
              shape shape_d
         FROM COLA_MARKETS
        WHERE NAME = 'cola_d');added the necessary entries in USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA and created a spatial index on COLA_MARKETS (SHAPE). However, when i do a spatial query against this view, i get ORA-03113. A spatial query against the base table works fine. Any ideas why this happens? (This is Oracle 10.2.0.3.0)
    Thanks in advance, Markus
    PS: This is my spatial query
    SELECT *
      FROM cola_markets_v t
    WHERE sdo_filter (t.shape_a,
                             SDO_GEOMETRY (2003,
                                           NULL,
                                           NULL,
                                           sdo_elem_info_array (1, 1003, 3),
                                           sdo_ordinate_array (1, 1, 2, 2)
                             'querytype=window'
                            ) = 'TRUE';

    Thank you for your reply. I have tried it with 11.1.0.6.0 today and it works. This might be an issue with 10.2.0.3.0.

  • Use of EXIST clause

    Need to seek advice on the use of EXISTS clause.
    What is this statement trying to do? What is the '1' in the inner SELECT statement means?
    DELETE FROM a
    WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
    FROM b
    WHERE a.a_id = b.a_id);
    What about these 2 statements doing??
    SELECT * FROM a WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM b WHERE a.a_id = b.a_id);
    DELETE FROM a
    WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM b WHERE a.a_id = b.a_id);

    have a look at http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:::::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID:953229842074 for a complete explanation of how an "exists" and an "in" is executed. For "not in" and "not exists", look here: http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:::::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID:442029737684
    greetings
    Freek D
    Freek and Mona are correct in that the 1 is just a place holder, because you need to SELECT something. However, the EXISTS clause actually returns TRUE or FALSE depending on whether the SELECT statement finds a row.
    EXISTS is similar to IN using a SELECT statement. The advantage of EXISTS, particularly when you can use a correlated sub-query, is that it stops looking as soon as it finds a single row that matches the criteria in the SELECT statement, where an IN clause will return all the rows that match, including duplicates

  • Problem with using a Spatial Query in a report region

    All: I am trying to create a report region using the below query. The query is syntactically correct and returns 10 rows. I have checked it out in SQL Developer AND in APEX SQL Workshop. It returns rows in 1-2 seconds.
    However, after putting the query into a report region, the APEX page locks up when it runs. I've tried masking it in a view, using other functions. I can places the spatial function in the select clause and it works. However, placing the function in the Where clause causes the page to lock up.
    Any thoughts?
    Thanks,
    John
    select lastname, address
    from changetracking.individuals
    where sdo_nn (spatiallocation, MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2001,8265,MDSYS.SDO_POINT_TYPE(-87.55728,33.137569,null),null,null), 'sdo_batch_size=10') = 'T

    QImaging is not officially supported in the Measurement & Automation (MAX) toolkit, though you may find some luck with our free legacy QImaging LabView interface here: http://www.qimaging.com/support/downloads/software/windows/QCamLabViewInstaller221.exe depending on the version lf LabView you're using.If you're looking for something that is actively updated and supported, you may want to get back in touch with Fred at +1.800.874.9789 and ask about our SITK LabView interface as well.
      PMQI_Josh,
    Yes I've already installed the LabVIEW interface beforehand. Also the version of LabVIEW I'm currently using is 8.6. I'll get in contact with Fred to see if there's a solution to this problem. Thank you.

  • Execution of subquery of IN and EXISTS clause.

    Hi Friends,
    Suppose we have following two tables:
    emp
    empno number
    ename varchar2(100)
    deptno number
    salary number
    dept
    deptno number
    location varchar2(100)
    deptname varchar2(100)
    status varchar2(100)
    Where dept is the master table for emp.
    Following query is fine to me:
    SELECT empno, ename
    FROM emp,dept
    WHERE emp.deptno = dept.deptno
    AND emp.salary &gt;=5000
    AND dept.status = 'ACTIVE';
    But I want to understand the behaviour of inline query (Used with IN and EXISTS clause) for which I have used this tables as an example (Just as Demo).
    1)
    Suppose we rewrite the above query as following:
    SELECT empno, ename
    FROM emp
    WHERE emp.salary &gt;=5000
    AND deptno in (SELECT deptno FROM dept where status = 'ACTIVE')
    Question: as shown in above query, suppose in our where clause, we have a condition with IN construct whose subquery is independent (it is not using any column of master query's resultset.). Then, will that query be executed only once or will it be executed for N number of times (N= number of records in emp table)
    In other words, how may times the subquery of IN clause as in above query be executed by complier to prepared the subquery's resultset?
    2)
    Suppose the we use the EXISTS clause (or NOT EXISTS clause) with subquery where, the subquery uses the field of master query in its where clause.
    SELECT E.empno, E.ename
    FROM emp E
    WHERE E.salary &gt;=5000
    AND EXISTS (SELECT 'X' FROM dept D where status = 'ACTIVE' AND D.deptno = E.deptno)
    Here also, I got same confusion. For how many times the subquery for EXISTS will be executed by oracle. For one time or for N number of times (I think, it will be N number of times).
    3)
    I know we can't define any fix thumbrule and its highly depends on requirement and other factors, but in general, Suppose our main query is on heavily loaded large transaction table and need to check existance of record in some less loaded and somewhat smaller transaction table, than which way will be better from performance point of view from above three. (1. Use of JOIN, 2. Use of IN, 3. Use of EXISTS)
    Please help me get solutions to these confusions..
    Thanks and Regards,
    Dipali..

    Dipali,
    First, I posted the links with my name only, I don;t know how did you pick another handle for addressing it?Never mind that.
    >
    Now another confusion I got.. I read that even if we used EXISTS and , CBO feels (from statistics and all his analysis) that using IN would be more efficient, than it will rewrite the query. My confusion is that, If CBO is smart enough to rewrite the query in its most efficient form, Is there any scope/need for a Developer/DBA to do SQL/Query tuning? Does this means that now , developer need not to work hard to write query in best menner, instade just what he needs to do is to write the query which resluts the data required by him..? Does this now mean that now no eperts are required for SQL tuning?
    >
    Where did you read that?Its good to see the reference which says this.I haven't come across any such thing where CBO will rewrite the query like this. Have a look at the following query.What we want to do is to get the list of all teh departments which have atleast one employee working in it.So how would be we write this query? Theremay be many ways.One,out of them is to use distinct.Let's see how it works,
    SQL> select * from V$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    CORE    11.1.0.6.0      Production
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
    SQL> set timing on
    SQL> set autot trace exp
    SQL> SELECT distinct  D.deptno, D.dname
      2        FROM     scott.dept D,scott.emp E
      3  where e.deptno=d.deptno
      4  order by d.deptno;
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.12
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 925733878
    | Id  | Operation                     | Name    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| T
    ime     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT              |         |     9 |   144 |     7  (29)| 0
    0:00:01 |
    |   1 |  SORT UNIQUE                  |         |     9 |   144 |     7  (29)| 0
    0:00:01 |
    |   2 |   MERGE JOIN                  |         |    14 |   224 |     6  (17)| 0
    0:00:01 |
    |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEPT    |     4 |    52 |     2   (0)| 0
    0:00:01 |
    |   4 |     INDEX FULL SCAN           | PK_DEPT |     4 |       |     1   (0)| 0
    0:00:01 |
    |*  5 |    SORT JOIN                  |         |    14 |    42 |     4  (25)| 0
    0:00:01 |
    |   6 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL         | EMP     |    14 |    42 |     3   (0)| 0
    0:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       5 - access("E"."DEPTNO"="D"."DEPTNO")
           filter("E"."DEPTNO"="D"."DEPTNO")
    SQL>
    SQL> SELECT distinct  D.deptno, D.dname
      2        FROM     scott.dept D,scott.emp E
      3  where e.deptno=d.deptno
      4  order by d.deptno;
        DEPTNO DNAME
            10 ACCOUNTING
            20 RESEARCH
            30 SALES
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.04
    SQL>So CBO did what we asked it do so.It made a full sort merge join.Now there is nothing wrong in it.There is no intelligence added by CBO to it.So now what, the query looks okay isn't it.If the answer is yes than let's finish the talk here.If no than we proceed further.
    We deliberately used the term "atleast" here.This would govern that we are not looking for entirely matching both the sources, emp and dept.Any matching result should solve our query's result.So , with "our knowledge" , we know that Exist can do that.Let's write teh query by it and see,
    SQL> SELECT   D.deptno, D.dname
      2        FROM     scott.dept D
      3          WHERE    EXISTS
      4                 (SELECT 1
      5                  FROM   scott.emp E
      6                  WHERE  E.deptno = D.deptno)
      7        ORDER BY D.deptno;
        DEPTNO DNAME
            10 ACCOUNTING
            20 RESEARCH
            30 SALES
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
    SQL>Wow, that's same but there is a small difference in the timing.Note that I did run the query several times to elliminate the physical reads and recursive calls to effect the demo. So its the same result, let's see the plan.
    SQL> SELECT   D.deptno, D.dname
      2        FROM     scott.dept D
      3          WHERE    EXISTS
      4                 (SELECT 1
      5                  FROM   scott.emp E
      6                  WHERE  E.deptno = D.deptno)
      7        ORDER BY D.deptno;
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.00
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 1090737117
    | Id  | Operation                    | Name    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Ti
    me     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |         |     3 |    48 |     6  (17)| 00
    :00:01 |
    |   1 |  MERGE JOIN SEMI             |         |     3 |    48 |     6  (17)| 00
    :00:01 |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DEPT    |     4 |    52 |     2   (0)| 00
    :00:01 |
    |   3 |    INDEX FULL SCAN           | PK_DEPT |     4 |       |     1   (0)| 00
    :00:01 |
    |*  4 |   SORT UNIQUE                |         |    14 |    42 |     4  (25)| 00
    :00:01 |
    |   5 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL         | EMP     |    14 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00
    :00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       4 - access("E"."DEPTNO"="D"."DEPTNO")
           filter("E"."DEPTNO"="D"."DEPTNO")Can you see a keyword called Semi here? This means that Oralce did make an equi join but not complete.Compare the bytes/rows returned from this as well as cost with the first query.Can you notice the difference?
    So what do we get from all this?You asked that if CBO becomes so smart, won't we need developers/dbas at that time?The answer is , what one wants to be, a monkey or an astranaut? Confused,read this,
    http://www.method-r.com/downloads/doc_download/6-the-oracle-advisors-from-a-different-perspective-karen-morton
    So it won't matter how much CBO would become intelligent, there will be still limitations to where it can go, what it can do.There will always be a need for a human to look all the automations.Rememember even the most sofisticated system needs some button to be pressed to get it on which is done by a human hand's finger ;-).
    Happy new year!
    HTH
    Aman....

  • How to create spatial query (sdo_relate) on 2 views

    Hi, I want to create a spatial query in the form of:
    select /*+ORDERED*/ column1,column2
    from view1,view2
    where sdo_relate(view2.geometry,view1.geometry,'mask= ... ')Both views are very fast and return a smal number of rows out of a large dataset. I would expect that running the spatial query on this selection should be fast but when performing the above query it takes quite some time.
    It seems that the spatial query is performed on the underlying tables before the views make their selection.
    What is a good way to handle this kind of problem? How to make the spatial query to be executed on the resultset of the views?
    thanks Rene

    Hi Udo,
    Let me tell you a bit more about the requirements of the application.
    We have a table with geometries. Some geometries are buildings, others are roads, trees, parking areas, etc.
    We let users specify what geometries they are interested in. This can be the type (tree, building) or a list of types, plus some other selection such as type of tree, name of road etc. Based on the specifications the application creates a view that returns exactly the geometries the user is interested in.
    Users may not only be interested in just a tree but may be looking for a tree located inside a building, or a building within a certain distance from a road. This then would be the query I am talking about in this post. Two views and a spatial relationship between them.
    Depending on the definition of the views and the data currently loaded the number of rows returned by the views will vary. I can't be there all the time making sure that the correct table is queried first and the correct hints are given. This is why we have the CBO. But it seems to do a poor job when it comes to spatial queries.
    Rene

Maybe you are looking for