SQ01 Query issue - Table join

Hi Gurus,
I need to make a change in already created query generating a report concerning Billing documents. Tables which are being used in there are VBRK, VBRP, VBPA & KNA1.
Now, I would like to add Purchase Order number as field in Field Group in related Infoset in SQ02.
The issue is when I include table VBKD field VBKD-BKSTD to fetch PO number and join it in infoset, it does get joined but the actual query does not work in SQ00 or SQ01 after getting this change done in infoset.
Can you please suggest if I am doing something wrong in joining the tables or should I try joining some other table to get this requirement??
Kindly help and thanks in advance for your suggestions!!
Regards
Bawa

Hi Shiva,
The issue is that I cannot use the field VBRP-AUBEL as it contains the document number of referenced Sales Document which is sales order type document number in my case.
Kindly suggest if I am doing something wrong in joining or do I have take care of some steps involving joining of tables??
Thanks
Bawa
Edited by: Bawa Bawa on Sep 23, 2009 9:44 PM
Edited by: Bawa Bawa on Sep 24, 2009 9:32 AM

Similar Messages

SQ01-query - how to join MARA and DRAD

Hi all,
my problem is that I have to create a sq01 query in which I combine data from the MARA
with data from DRAD. But I can't join the OBJKY (DRAD) with the MATRN (MARA).
Hoping for help,
Barbara

Hi Barbara,
As mentioned in the previous post, you cannot join the OBJKY field with MATNR field of MARA.
But if you want to just read the contents in OBJKY from DRAD, then have a look at the below code:
Note: In the initial step of creating your infoset, just select direct read from table & select on MARA here.
SELECT SINGLE DOKNR INTO T_DOKNR
FROM DRAD
WHERE OBJKY EQ MARA-MATNR
AND DOKOB EQ 'MARA'
AND DOKAR EQ (Specify the type of document for this).
Now you can combine the fields MATNR, T_DONR & the Z field into the field which you want using the CONCATENATE statement.
\[removed by moderator\]
Regards,
Vivek
Edited by: Jan Stallkamp on Sep 3, 2008 3:51 PM

How to query a table join in SAP?

Hi,
We are rolling out SAP and our abapers are wondering how to debug production problems. From our experience with PeopleSoft, there is often a need to query tables directly in production. These queries are often joins. SAP provides SE16 to query a single table, but how to SDN'ers query a join in PROD?
For a basic example, how would you join a sales item and sales header? We are thinking of using Oracle OpenSQL to have direct table access. Solutions that somehow use SAP security for developers to access production are good!
Any suggestions are welcome and points will be rewarded!!
Peter

Peter,
Be careful if your company is large enough to have been impacted by Sarbanes-Oxley 404. Your external auditing firm should be engaged in whatever approach you take.
This type of information/querying is now much more monitored/controlled for SOX 404-impacted organizations.
Example - SQVI has been removed from all PRD instances in our company b/c of SOX 404.

Order Query in SQ01 using Table Joins in CRM

Hello Experts,
I am trying to create a query using table joins in SQ01 in CRM because I need a report that will give me all transactions for a selected Business Partner. I am unable to display any results when running my query. I have found other threads which give a list of possible tables to join together, but the fields used in the joins were not described.
The tables I have joined in my query are as follows:
CRMD_ORDERADM_H
CRMD_ORDER_INDEX
CRMD_PARTNER
BUT_000
I have used SE16 to try to search for additional tables to use for linking the Business Partner with a transaction, but I have been unsuccessful.
Would anyone please give advice as how to proceed?
Reward points are available!
Thank you in advance,
David

David
The link with be the GUID.
CRMD_ORDERADM_H = Document Header Table
CRMD_ORDERADM_I = Document Line item Table
CRMD_LINK = Lists various link GUIDs, to
access order Information
The Table CRMD_ORDERADM_H will contain you transactions , once you find the GUID of your sales transaction in the table CRMD_ORDERADM_H.
You then need to check the table CRMD_LINK.
In this table you will then find a number in 11 = sales. This refers to the table CRMD_SALES. There are also links to many other tables ie Shipping, pricing, org etc.
CRMM_BUT_SET0140 - for Sales Group, Sales Office, District
CRMM_BUT_LNK0141 - for Sales Area data
Transaction CRMD_BUS2000115 allows you to see all sales transactions for a BP. CRMD_BUS2000126 shows you activities for selected BP.
Regards
M

Using Table.Join formula takes extremly long time to get results.(Why Query Folding doesn't work?)

Hi,
I built a query with 4 tables inside (load from Oracle DB and two of them are quite big, more than millions of rows). After filtering, I tried to build relationships between tables using Table.Join formula. However, the process took extremly long time to
bring out results (I ended the process after 15 mins' processing). There's a status bar kept updating while the query was processing, which is showed as . I suppose
this is because the query folding didn't working, so PQ had to load all the data to local memory first then do the opertion, instead of doing all the work on the source system side. Am I right? If yes, is there any ways to solve this issue?
Thanks.
Regards,
Qilong

Hi Curt,
Here's the query that I'm refering,
let
 Source = Oracle.Database("reporting"),
 AOLOT_HISTS = Source{[Schema="GEN",Item="MVIEW$_AOLOT_HISTS"]}[Data],
 WORK_WEEK = Source{[Schema="GEN",Item="WORK_WEEK"]}[Data],
 DEVICES = Source{[Schema="GEN",Item="MVIEW$_DEVICES"]}[Data],
 AO_LOTS = Source{[Schema="GEN",Item="MVIEW$_AO_LOTS"]}[Data],
 Filter_WorkWeek = Table.SelectRows(WORK_WEEK, each ([WRWK_YEAR] = 2015) and (([WORK_WEEK] = 1) or ([WORK_WEEK] = 2) or ([WORK_WEEK] = 3))),
 Filter_AlotHists = Table.SelectRows(AOLOT_HISTS, each ([STEP_NAME] = "BAKE" or [STEP_NAME] = "COLD TEST-IFLEX" or [STEP_NAME] = "COLD TEST-MFLEX") and ([OUT_QUANTITY] <> 0)),
 #"Added Custom" = Table.AddColumn(Filter_AlotHists, "Custom", each Table.SelectRows(Filter_WorkWeek, (table2Row) => [PROCESS_END_TIME] >= table2Row[WRWK_START_DATE] and [PROCESS_END_TIME] <= table2Row[WRWK_END_DATE])),
 #"Expand Custom" = Table.ExpandTableColumn(#"Added Custom", "Custom", {"WRWK_YEAR", "WORK_WEEK", "WRWK_START_DATE", "WRWK_END_DATE"}, {"WRWK_YEAR", "WORK_WEEK",
"WRWK_START_DATE", "WRWK_END_DATE"}),
 Filter_AolotHists_byWeek = Table.SelectRows(#"Expand Custom", each ([WORK_WEEK] <> null)),
 SelectColumns_AolotHists = Table.SelectColumns(Filter_AolotHists_byWeek,{"ALOT_NUMBER", "STEP_NAME", "PROCESS_START_TIME", "PROCESS_END_TIME", "START_QUANTITY", "OUT_QUANTITY", "REJECT_QUANTITY",
"WRWK_FISCAL_YEAR", "WRWK_WORK_WEEK_NO"}),
 Filter_Devices= Table.SelectRows(DEVICES, each ([DEPARTMENT] = "TEST1")),
 SelectColumns_Devices = Table.SelectColumns(Filter_Devices,{"DEVC_NUMBER", "PCKG_CODE"}),
 Filter_AoLots = Table.SelectRows(AO_LOTS, each Text.Contains([DEVC_NUMBER], "MC09XS3400AFK") or Text.Contains([DEVC_NUMBER], "MC09XS3400AFKR2") or Text.Contains([DEVC_NUMBER], "MC10XS3412CHFK") or Text.Contains([DEVC_NUMBER],
"MC10XS3412CHFKR2")),
 SelectColumns_AoLots = Table.SelectColumns(Filter_AoLots,{"ALOT_NUMBER", "DEVC_NUMBER", "TRACECODE", "WAFERLOTNUMBER"}),
 TableJoin = Table.Join(SelectColumns_AolotHists, "ALOT_NUMBER", Table.PrefixColumns(SelectColumns_AoLots, "AoLots"), "AoLots.ALOT_NUMBER"),
 TableJoin1 = Table.Join(TableJoin, "AoLots.DEVC_NUMBER", Table.PrefixColumns(SelectColumns_Devices, "Devices"), "Devices.DEVC_NUMBER")
in
 TableJoin1
Could you please give me some hints why it needs so long to process?
Thanks.

Query Rewrite ISSUE (ANSI JOINS do not work, traditional join works ) 11gR2

For some types of queries constructed with ANSI JOINS, materialized views are not being used.
This is currently increasing time on various reports since we cannot control the way the queries are generated(Tableau Application generates and runs queries against the STAR Schema).
Have tried to debug this behavior using DBMS_MVIEW.EXPLAIN_REWRITE and mv_capabilities function without any success.
The database is configured for query rewrite: REWRITE INTEGRITY, QUERY REWRITE ENABLED and other settings are in place.
Have successfully reproduced the issue using SH Sample schema:
Q1 and Q2 are logically identical the only difference between them being the type of join used:
Q1: ANSI JOIN
Q2: Traditional join
Below is an example that can be validated on SH sample schema.
Any help on this will be highly appreciated.
-- Q1: the query is generated by an app and needs to be rewritten with materialized view
SELECT cntr.country_subregion, cust.cust_year_of_birth, COUNT(DISTINCT cust.cust_first_name)
FROM customers cust
INNER JOIN countries cntr
   ON cust.country_id = cntr.country_id
GROUP BY cntr.country_subregion, cust_year_of_birth;
-- Q2: the query with traditional join is rewritten with materialized view
SELECT cntr.country_subregion, cust.cust_year_of_birth, COUNT(DISTINCT cust.cust_first_name)
FROM customers cust
INNER JOIN countries cntr
   ON cust.country_id = cntr.country_id
GROUP BY cntr.country_subregion, cust_year_of_birth;Tested both queries with the following materialized views:
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MVIEW_TEST_1
ENABLE QUERY REWRITE
AS
SELECT cntr.country_subregion, cust.cust_year_of_birth, COUNT(DISTINCT cust.cust_first_name)
FROM customers cust
INNER JOIN countries cntr
   ON cust.country_id = cntr.country_id
GROUP BY cntr.country_subregion, cust_year_of_birth;
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MVIEW_TEST_2
ENABLE QUERY REWRITE
AS
SELECT cntr.country_subregion, cust.cust_year_of_birth, COUNT(DISTINCT cust.cust_first_name)
FROM customers cust, countries cntr
WHERE cust.country_id = cntr.country_id
GROUP BY cntr.country_subregion, cust_year_of_birth;Explain Plans showing that Q1 does not use materialized view and Q2 uses materialized view
SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLY
--Q1 does not use MVIEW_TEST_1
SQL> SELECT cntr.country_subregion, cust.cust_year_of_birth, COUNT(DISTINCT cust.cust_first_name)
FROM customers cust
INNER JOIN countries cntr
   ON cust.country_id = cntr.country_id
GROUP BY cntr.country_subregion, cust_year_of_birth; 2    3    4    5
511 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1218164197
| Id | Operation           | Name       | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time       |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |        |   425 | 12325 |       |   916   (1)| 00:00:11 |
|   1 | HASH GROUP BY           |        |   425 | 12325 |       |   916   (1)| 00:00:11 |
|   2 |   VIEW                | VM_NWVW_1 | 55500 | 1571K|       |   916   (1)| 00:00:11 |
|   3 |    HASH GROUP BY      |        | 55500 | 1842K| 2408K|   916   (1)| 00:00:11 |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN           |        | 55500 | 1842K|       |   409   (1)| 00:00:05 |
|   5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL| COUNTRIES |    23 |   414 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL| CUSTOMERS | 55500 |   867K|       |   405   (1)| 00:00:05 |
--Q2 uses MVIEW_TEST_2
SQL> SELECT cntr.country_subregion, cust.cust_year_of_birth, COUNT(DISTINCT cust.cust_first_name)
FROM customers cust, countries cntr
WHERE cust.country_id = cntr.country_id
GROUP BY cntr.country_subregion, cust_year_of_birth; 2    3    4
511 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2126022771
| Id | Operation               | Name         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT          |              |     511 | 21973 |       3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | MAT_VIEW REWRITE ACCESS FULL| MVIEW_TEST_2 |     511 | 21973 |       3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Database version 11gR1 (Tested also on 11gR2)
SQL> select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE     11.2.0.1.0     Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production

Thanks for the formatting tips.
Just found an Oracle Bug which explains the above behavior.
Unfortunately the bug will be fixed only in 12.1 Release so as a workaround will try to use traditional joins.
For those who have metalink access see [Bug 10145667 : ERRORS TRYING TO REWRITE QUERY WITH EXACT TEXT MATCH TO MVIEW]

Issue with Join query

Question 1:
I have run into an issue of join between the two tables.
There are two tables named a and b with the following descriptions -
desc a
Name Null Type
STORE_NUMBER NOT NULL CHAR(9)
ASSORTMENT_NUMBER NOT NULL CHAR(9)
ITEM_NUMBER NOT NULL CHAR(9)
DESCRIPTION CHAR(1000)
UPC_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(15)
STOCK_FLAG CHAR(1)
AVG_RTL_PRICE CHAR(16)
SALES_MOVEMENT CHAR(16)
PROD_STYLE CHAR(50)
COLOR CHAR(50)
ATT_1 CHAR(50)
ATT_2 CHAR(50)
ATT_3 CHAR(50)
ATT_4 CHAR(50)
ATT_5 CHAR(50)
ATT_6 CHAR(50)
ATT_7 CHAR(50)
ATT_8 CHAR(50)
ATT_9 CHAR(50)
ATT_10 CHAR(50)
ATT_11 CHAR(50)
ATT_12 CHAR(50)
ATT_13 CHAR(50)
ATT_14 CHAR(50)
ATT_15 CHAR(50)
25 rows selected
desc b
Name Null Type
ASSORTMENT_NUMBER NOT NULL CHAR(9)
ITEM_NUMBER NOT NULL CHAR(9)
MERCH_METHOD NOT NULL VARCHAR2(15)
UPC_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(15)
MODEL_NUMBER CHAR(50)
HEIGHT CHAR(10)
WIDTH CHAR(10)
DEPTH CHAR(10)
IMAGE_FILE_NAME CHAR(500)
LINESHAPE_FILE_NAME CHAR(500)
IPU CHAR(10)
ASSORTMENT_NAME VARCHAR2(100)
12 rows selected
There are 23094 records for assortment_number 16370 in the table a and 123 records in the table b.
But, when I run the below query using matching assortment number and upc code, its returning more than 2.5 million records. Why is it doing a product?
select
a.store_number,
a.assortment_number,
a.item_number,
a.description,
a.upc_code,
a.avg_rtl_price,
a.sales_movement,
b.height,
b.width,
b.depth,
b.merch_method,
b.model_number,
b.ipu,
b.assortment_name
from a,
b
where
ltrim(trim(a.assortment_number),0) = ltrim(trim(b.assortment_number),0)
and ltrim(trim(a.assortment_number),0) = ‘16370’
and
ltrim(trim(b.upc_code),0) = ltrim(trim(b.upc_code),0);
Question 2 -
Can I break the query down by store numbers from both the tables and extract them to separate files by store numbers?
Appreciate your inputs. Thanks in advance.

853720 wrote:
But how do I fix my query so as to return not the product of the two tables but only the unique matching records based on assortment_number and upc_code ?And what is "unique matching record" Based on table B each assortment has multiple items. So it looks like table B uniqueness is on assortment_number, item_number. So question is what is column upc_code? Is it assortment upc or item upc? If it is not item upc - you got your unswer. Actually, I just noticed:
ltrim(trim(b.upc_code),0) = ltrim(trim(b.upc_code),0);It should be:
ltrim(trim(a.upc_code),0) = ltrim(trim(b.upc_code),0);SY.
P.S. I am not questioning column datatypes at this point, but they obviously indicate bad design. You should at least use VARCHAR2 instead of CHAR.

In a SQL query whihc has join, How to reduce Multiple instance of a table

in a SQL query which has join, How to reduce Multiple instance of a table
Here is an example: I am using Oracle 9i
is there a way to reduce no.of Person instances from the following query? or can I optimize this query further?
TABLES:
mail_table
mail_id, from_person_id, to_person_id, cc_person_id, subject, body
person_table
person_id, name, email
QUERY:
SELECT p_from.name from, p_to.name to, p_cc.name cc, subject
FROM mail, person p_from, person p_to, person p_cc
WHERE from_person_id = p_from.person_id
AND to_person_id = p_to.person_id
AND cc_person_id = p_cc.person_id
Thnanks in advance,
Babu.

SQL> select * from mail;
        ID          F          T         CC
         1          1          2          3
SQL> select * from person;
       PID NAME
         1 a
         2 b
         3 c
--Query with only ne Instance of PERSON Table
SQL> select m.id,max(decode(m.f,p.pid,p.name)) frm_name,
2         max(decode(m.t,p.pid,p.name)) to_name,
3         max(decode(m.cc,p.pid,p.name)) cc_name
4 from mail m,person p
5 where m.f = p.pid
6 or m.t = p.pid
7 or m.cc = p.pid
8 group by m.id;
        ID FRM_NAME   TO_NAME    CC_NAME
         1 a          b          c
--Expalin plan for "One instance" Query
SQL> explain plan for
2 select m.id,max(decode(m.f,p.pid,p.name)) frm_name,
3         max(decode(m.t,p.pid,p.name)) to_name,
4         max(decode(m.cc,p.pid,p.name)) cc_name
5 from mail m,person p
6 where m.f = p.pid
7 or m.t = p.pid
8 or m.cc = p.pid
9 group by m.id;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 902563036
| Id | Operation           | Name   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |        |     3 |   216 |     7 (15)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | HASH GROUP BY      |        |     3 |   216 |     7 (15)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS      |        |     3 |   216 |     6   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| MAIL   |     1 |    52 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| PERSON |     3 |    60 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   4 - filter("M"."F"="P"."PID" OR "M"."T"="P"."PID" OR
              "M"."CC"="P"."PID")
Note
   - dynamic sampling used for this statement
--Explain plan for "Normal" query
SQL> explain plan for
2 select m.id,pf.name fname,pt.name tname,pcc.name ccname
3 from mail m,person pf,person pt,person pcc
4 where m.f = pf.pid
5 and m.t = pt.pid
6 and m.cc = pcc.pid;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 4145845855
| Id | Operation            | Name   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |        |     1 |   112 |    14 (15)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN           |        |     1 |   112 |    14 (15)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 |   HASH JOIN          |        |     1 |    92 |    10 (10)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN         |        |     1 |    72 |     7 (15)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| MAIL   |     1 |    52 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| PERSON |     3 |    60 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|   6 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL | PERSON |     3 |    60 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | PERSON |     3 |    60 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - access("M"."CC"="PCC"."PID")
   2 - access("M"."T"="PT"."PID")
   3 - access("M"."F"="PF"."PID")
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Note
   - dynamic sampling used for this statement
25 rows selected.
Message was edited by:
        jeneesh
No indexes created...

How to create an explain plan with rowsource statistics for a complex query that include multiple table joins ?

1. How to create an explain plan with rowsource statistics for a complex query that include multiple table joins ?
When multiple tables are involved , and the actual number of rows returned is more than what the explain plan tells. How can I find out what change is needed in the stat plan ?
2. Does rowsource statistics gives some kind of understanding of Extended stats ?

You can get Row Source Statistics only *after* the SQL has been executed. An Explain Plan midway cannot give you row source statistics.
To get row source statistics either set STATISTICS_LEVEL='ALL' in the session that executes theSQL OR use the Hint "gather_plan_statistics" in the SQL being executed.
Then use dbms_xplan.display_cursor
Hemant K Chitale

Select query based on joining of tables from different database is taking too long

Hi Team,
Select query on table with millions of records is taking very long time. It took 50mins, the below query is joining on multiple table from two databases DB1.dbo.Table1 contains 100 million records and also Table3 and Table4 (of different database) might
contain close to 1million records.
Select T1.*
From DB1.dbo.Table1 T1
Join DB1.dbo.Table2 T2 on RTRIM(T1.Col3) = RTRIM(T2.Col3)
Join Table4 CA on RTRIM(T1.Col1) + T2.Col2 = CA.Col1
Join Table3 U on CA.Col2 = U.Col2 AND RTRIM(T2.Col2) = U.Col3
Where U.Col4 NOT IN ('A1', 'A2', 'A3', 'A4', 'A5', 'A6','A7','A8','A9')
And (T1.flg IS NULL OR T1.flg = 'N')
And LTRIM(RTRIM(T2.Col2)) NOT IN ('B1','B2')
How can i improve the performance of this query. Actual thing is update the data in Db1.dbo.table1 based on the conditions but if the select is taking close to 1hr then update will take hours together. Indexes already implemented on all the tables.
Thanks,
Eshwar.
Please don't forget to Marked as Answer if my post solved your problem and use Vote As Helpful if a post was useful. It will helpful to other users.

Thanks.
Join Table4 CA on RTRIM(T1.Col1) + T2.Col2 = CA.Col1
This join is not working with spaces if Rtrim is not used.
Thanks! Eshwar.
Please don't forget to Marked as Answer if my post solved your problem and use Vote As Helpful if a post was useful. It will helpful to other users.

How to build table join query in Jdeveloper

Hi,
Can someone tell me how to build table join query in Jdeveloper's Expression Builder UI?

[Is it possible to create a table of contents in Crystal Reports?|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes_boj/sdn_oss_boj_erq/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/scn_bosap/notes%7B6163636573733d36393736354636443646363436353344333933393338323636393736354637333631373036453646373436353733354636453735364436323635373233443330333033303331333233313335333133303330%7D.do]

How can i fetch records from 3 tables in a single query without using join

Hi.
Can any body please tell me How can i fetch records from 3 tables with a single query without using joins
Thanx
prabhudutta

Hi Prabgudutta,
We can fetch the data by using the views concept.
Go throuth this info we can know the how to create view and same like database table only we can fetch the data.
Views conatin the data at runtime only.
Four different view types are supported. These differ in the
way in which the view is implemented and in the methods
permitted for accessing the view data.
Database views are implemented with an equivalent view on
the database.
Projection views are used to hide fields of a table (only
projection).
Help views can be used as selection method in search helps.
Maintenance views permit you to maintain the data
distributed
on several tables for one application object at one time.
step by step creation of Maintenance view:
With the help of the table maintenance generator, you are able to maintain the ENTRIES of the table in SM30 transaction.
It can be set in transaction SE11 - Tools - Table maintenance generator.
Table maintanance Generator is used to manually input values using transaction sm30
follow below steps
1) go to se11 check table maintanance check box under attributes tab
2) utilities-table maintanance Generator-> create function group and assign it under
function group input box. Also assign authorization group default &NC& .
3) select standard recording routine radio in table table mainitainence generator to move table
contents to quality and production by assigning it to request.
4) select maintaience type as single step.
5) maintainence screen as system generated numbers this dialog box appears when you click on create button
6) save and activate table
One step, two step in Table Maintenance Generator
Single step: Only overview screen is created i.e. the Table Maintenance Program will have only one screen where you can add, delete or edit records.
Two step: Two screens namely the overview screen and Single screen are created. The user can see the key fields in the first screen and can further go on to edit further details.
SM30 is used for table maintenance(addition or deletion of records),
For all the tables in SE11 for which Table maintenance is selected , they can be maintained in SM30
Sm30 is used to maintain the table ,i.e to delete ,insert or modify the field values and all..
It creates the maintenance screen for u for the aprticular table as the maintenance is not allowed for the table..
In the SE11 delivery and maintenance tab, keep the maintenance allowed..
Then come to the SM30 and then enter the table name and press maintain..,
Give the authorization group if necessary and give the function group and then select maintenance type as one step and give the screen numbers as system specified..
Then create,,,
Then u will able to see the maintenance view for the table in which u can able to insert and delete the table values...
We use SM30 transaction for entering values into any DB table.
First we create a table in SE11 and create the table maintenance generator for that Table using (utilities-> table maintenance generator) and create it.
Then it will create a View.
After that from SM30, enter the table name and Maintain, create new entries, change the existing entries for that table.
Hope this resolves your query.
Reward all the helpful answers.
Rgds,
P.Naganjana Reddy

Table join and Logical databasein a same query

Hi Experts,
I have an existing query which is created using table join. I now want to add a logical database in the same infoset.
Is it possible to add a logical database in the same infoset?
Regards,
Prakhar

Hi Prakhar,
If you see the below scren, you can use data source either Table join using basis table or Logical database.
but if you need ldb with some addition table field then you can data retrieval by program step or you can use LDB with doing some code in inside your infoset.
Regards,
Prasenjit

Need to delete a table join in ABAP query

Hi
I have created an ABAP query with a join over AUFK, AFIH, AFKO, AFVV, AFVC and AFRU.
I need to delete the table AFRU from the join. I tried to delete the table in the edit option in the Join table option. I deleted the links between the table AFVC and AFRU and clicked on delete table option. I get the message Table AFRU not used. Please let me know if there is any method to delete the table.
Thanks and Regards,
Ajith

u have to break the link between this table and other tables...U need to delete where conditions and then delete the join...

3 Table Joins -- Need a more efficient Query

I need a 3 table join but need to do it more efficiently than I am currently doing. The query is taking too long to execute (in excess of 20 mins. These are huge tables with 10 mil + records). Here is what the query looks like right now. I need 100 distinct acctnum from the below query with all the conditions as requirements.
THANKS IN ADVANCE FOR HELP!!!
SELECT /*+ parallel */
FROM (SELECT /*+ parallel */ DISTINCT (a.acctnum),
 a.acctnum_status,
 a.sys_creation_date,
 a.sys_update_date,
 c.comp_id,
 c.comp_lbl_type,
 a.account_sub_type
 FROM account a
 LEFT JOIN
 company c
 ON a.comp_id = c.comp_id AND c.comp_lbl_type = 'IND',
 subaccount s
 WHERE a.account_type = 'I'
 AND a.account_status IN ('O', 'S')
 and s.subaccount_status in ('A','S')
 AND a.account_sub_type NOT IN ('G', 'V')
 AND a.SYS_update_DATE <= SYSDATE - 4 / 24)
where ROWNUM <= 100 ;

Hi,
Whenever you have a question, post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for a little sample data, and the results you want from that data. Explain how you get those results from that data.
Simplify the problem, if possible. If you need 100 distinct rows, post a problem where you only need, say, 3 distinct rows. Just explain that you really need 100, and you'll get a solution that works for either 3 or 100.
Always say which version of Oracle you're using (e.g. 11.2.0.3.0).
See the forum FAQ: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002
For tuning problems, also see https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362003
Are you sure the query you posted is even doing what you want? You're cross-joining s to the other tables, producing all possible combinations of rows, and then picking 100 of those in no particular order (not even random order). That's not necessarily wrong, but it certainly is suspicious.
If you're only interested in 100 rows, there's probably some way to write the query so that it picks 100 rows from the big tables first.

SQ01 Query issue - Table join

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for