SQL Maximum Command Length

I have created a MySQL database and a LabView 8.6 application which inserts data into the database, using the SQL toolkit. I'm having trouble inserting very long character data into a LONGTEXT field. I've determined that the issue occurs when either the length of the SQL command exceeds 1,048,574 characters or the length of one particular field exceeds 1,048,326 characters (can't tell which).
The error I get is "Error -2147467259 occurred at NI_Database_API.lvlib:Conn Execute.vi. Exception occured in Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers: [MySQL][ODBC 5.1 Driver][mysqld-5.1.35-community]MySQL server has gone away in NI_Database_API.lvlib:Conn Execute.vi"
According to the MYSQL documentation, a LONGTEXT can hold 4,294,967,295 characters, so length shouldn't be an issue. The documentation also states "The effective maximum length of LONGTEXT columns also depends on the configured maximum packet size in the client/server protocol and available memory", but I'm not sure how to configure the packet size in LabView.
I'm attaching example code which replicates the problem, although it depends upon a particular table structure to actually execute. The table definition is included on the diagram.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
ExampleInsertError.VI ‏40 KB

This setting would be configured outside of LabVIEW (UDL or DSN).
You need to configure both the server and the client:
I found this link by searching on stackoverflow
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/packet-too-large.html
You may need to select/configure a specific (different) provider in order to set this variable.
Now is the right time to use %^<%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%3uZ>T
If you don't hate time zones, you're not a real programmer.
"You are what you don't automate"
Inplaceness is synonymous with insidiousness

Similar Messages

SQL Loader-704: Internal error: Maximum record length must be = [10000000]

Hi,
running SQL*Loader (Release 8.1.7.2.1) causes an error "SQL*Loader-704: Internal error: Maximum record length must be <= [10000000]". This error occurs when SQLLoader is trying to load several thousand records into a database table. Each record is less than 250 bytes in length.
Any idea what could cause the problem?
Thanks in advance!
Ingo
And here's an extract from the log file generated by SQLLoader :
Number to load: ALL
Number to skip: 0
Errors allowed: 50
Bind array: 1360 rows, maximum of 10485760 bytes
Continuation: none specified
Path used: Conventional
Table "SYSTEM"."BASICPROFILE$1", loaded from every logical record.
Insert option in effect for this table: APPEND
TRAILING NULLCOLS option in effect
Column Name Position Len Term Encl Datatype
UUID FIRST * O(X07) CHARACTER
DOMAINID NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
LASTMODIFIED NEXT * O(X07) DATE DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS
ANNIVERSARY NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
BIRTHDAY NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
COMPANYNAME NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
DESCRIPTION NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
FIRSTNAME NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
COMPANYNAMETRANSCRIPTION NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
FIRSTNAMETRANSCRIPTION NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
GENDER NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
HOBBIES NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
HONORIFIC NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
JOBTITLE NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
KEYWORDS NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
LASTNAME NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
LASTNAMETRANSCRIPTION NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
NICKNAME NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
PREFERREDLOCALE NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
PREFERREDCURRENCY NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
PROFESSION NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
SECONDLASTNAME NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
SECONDNAME NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
SUFFIX NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
TITLE NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
CONFIRMATION NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
DEFAULTADDRESSID NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
BUSINESSPARTNERNO NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
TYPECODE NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
OCA NEXT * O(X07) CHARACTER
SQL*Loader-704: Internal error: Maximum record length must be <= [10000000]

As a second guess, the terminator changes or goes missing at some point in the data file. If you are running on *NIX, try wc -l data_file_name. This will give a count of the number of lines (delimited by CHR(10) ) that are in the file. If this is not close to the number you expected, then that is your problem.
You could also try gradually working through the data file loading 100 records, then 200, then 300 etc. to see where it starts to fail.
HTH
John

SQL Azure Reporting - There was an exception running the extensions specified in the config file. --- Maximum request length exceeded.

I am trying to deploy an RDL file (5MB) to SQL Azure Reporting server in South Central US using the deploy function in SQL Server Data Tools but facing the following error during deployment to Azure Reporting server.
"There was an exception running the extensions specified in the config file. ---> Maximum request length exceeded."
Is there any limit on the size of RDL files which can be deployed to Azure Reporting server? I have seen some online posts which talk about increasing the maxRequestLength in httpruntime of web.config in Reporting server. But in case of Azure Reporting server
how can be make modification to this configuration?
I have tried to upload it directly to SQL Azure Reporting server from the Management Portal --> Upload Report function which still resulted in error.
Thanks & Regards, Deep

Thanks for your question. Unfortunately we are in the process of deprecating SQL Reporting services. Full details are available at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg430130.aspx
Thanks Guy

SQL command length

I am kind of tired searching for solution on web. Let us hope some expert help.
Is there a limit on command length in sql prompt? I am using Oracle 10g and found that sql prompt doesnt take command line longer than 256 char.
SQL> update oe_order_headers_all set attribute19 = (select attribute19 from xx_quote_additional_info where username = 'DTUKADIABjk') where order_number = 14502 and attribute19 = (select attribute19 from xx_quote_additional_info where username = 'DTUKADIABjk') ;
This are 256 char if I want to add something to this line, it wont take.....have to add to next line and then run.
Only issue is I have to devide long query into multiple lines and then run. can not directly copy from code and run.

user11032875 wrote:
Thanks 009,
That solve partial of my issue. I set following command,
DEFINE _EDITOR=vi
Now this opens vi editor and I can paste my long command. then / , But for each change again have to go to vi editor doesnt sound good to me. Using an editor to edit your query doesn't sound good? ?:|
Sounds ideal to me.
I tried sqlplus on my local desktop with Oracle 11g database. It allow you to enter as may characters as command. But my sqlplus with Oracle 9i database allows only 258.You intially said you were using 10g, not 9i. That makes a difference. Upgrade your SQL*Plus client to 10g or 11g.

Maximum statement length of 8192 Error

Hello folks. I'm using OBIEE 10.1.3.3.3 and got the following error when building a pivot table report with a large of calculated fields.
"State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 59036] The resulting SQL statement exceeded the maximum statement length of 8192. (HY000)"
Does anybody know how to resolve this?

Check this doc, its same for all versions of BI
Sec: A.6.8
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/bi.1111/e10541/configfileref.htm#CACECAFJ
Pls mark as correct if helps

Windows service, error Maximum request length exceeded

What is causing this error, from the windows service?
There was an exception running the extensions specified in the config file. ---> Maximum request length exceeded

Hi Nick,
Per my understanding you got this error "Maximum request length exceeded" about your reporting services, right?
It seems the issue is caused by the request reach the max length.
To solve the issue, please made the changes in web.config of both the Report Server and the Report Manager:
<httpRuntime executionTimeout = "9000" maxRequestLength=" 2097151" />
If the solution above does not help, please post the error logs of the Report Server. The error logs will help us more about troubleshooting and also provide us details information about what actions you are doing when causing this error.
We can get the logs from:
<Install Driver>:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.<X>\Reporting Services\LogFiles
Please feel free to ask, if you have any more questions.
Regards
Vicky Liu

Maximum request length exceeded

I'm trying to upload a file to mobile services .NET backend, however I'm getting the error "Maximum request length exceeded". I tried increasing the limit in web.config file, but it only worked on the local version and still throws the error when
published to Azure.
As far as I understand the mobile services is ignoring the web.config file. So is there any other way to increase the upload limit?

good news.. found a fix for this.
it's actually the same fix for file uploads that exceed the default 4mb set by IIS. however, the change needs to made to the report manager web.config file and not the report server web.config file. that's why it didn't work for me the first time.
here is an article that talks about it http://support.softartisans.com/kbview_825.aspx
if you have kept the default installation directory, the file you edit is:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.3\Reporting Services\ReportManager\Web.config
Just add the maxRequestLength property here and set a size appropriate to you. Not to large to discourage DoS attacks.
The example below is 10mb
<httpRuntime executionTimeout="9000" maxRequestLength="10240"/>
hope it helps.

[b]ORA-01450: maximum key length exceeded[/b]

Hi I get this error when trying to migrate MS Access 2000 to Oracle. I get this error on foreign key and primary keys saying that the maximum key length has been exceeded.
What does this mean and how can I fix it? Can anyone help?
Thanks
Ray

Maximum key length also depends on tablespace block size. It seems that your value (1942) may be for 2K blocks.
At least for my 10.2.0.1.0 on Windoze it takes
1478 for 2k tablespace
3118 for 4k tablespace
6398 for 8k tablespace
If you have 2K blocks I'd say it is somewhat rather small blocks, I'd normally use 8K blocks.
So if you have possibility (have at least version 9, probably 9.2 don't know exactly) to create tablespaces with non default blocksize then as a temporal solution you can create tablespace with larger blocksize and create index in it.
Of course so you have to allocate also some memory for these blocksizes and so divide your memory in possibly less utilized pieces.
See example for my 8k default blocksize test DB:
SQL> create table v (a varchar2(4000), b varchar2(4000), c varchar2(4000));
Table created.
SQL> insert into v values (lpad('a', 4000, 'a'), null, null);
1 row created.
SQL> create index vidx on v (a, b, c);
create index vidx on v (a, b, c)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01450: maximum key length (6398) exceeded
SQL> alter system set db_16k_cache_size = 10240;
System altered.
SQL> create tablespace big datafile 'big.dbf' size 10 m blocksize 16k;
Tablespace created.
SQL> create index vidx on v (a, b, c) tablespace big;
Index created.
Gints Plivna
http://www.gplivna.eu
Message was edited by:
gintsp
Of course inserting a row was completely unnecessary :)

ORA 01450 : maximum key length (1942) exceeded

hI all,
i got that message when try to create index.
ORA 01450 : maximum key length (1942) exceeded
Regards,

Maximum key length also depends on tablespace block size. It seems that your value (1942) may be for 2K blocks.
At least for my 10.2.0.1.0 on Windoze it takes
1478 for 2k tablespace
3118 for 4k tablespace
6398 for 8k tablespace
If you have 2K blocks I'd say it is somewhat rather small blocks, I'd normally use 8K blocks.
So if you have possibility (have at least version 9, probably 9.2 don't know exactly) to create tablespaces with non default blocksize then as a temporal solution you can create tablespace with larger blocksize and create index in it.
Of course so you have to allocate also some memory for these blocksizes and so divide your memory in possibly less utilized pieces.
See example for my 8k default blocksize test DB:
SQL> create table v (a varchar2(4000), b varchar2(4000), c varchar2(4000));
Table created.
SQL> insert into v values (lpad('a', 4000, 'a'), null, null);
1 row created.
SQL> create index vidx on v (a, b, c);
create index vidx on v (a, b, c)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01450: maximum key length (6398) exceeded
SQL> alter system set db_16k_cache_size = 10240;
System altered.
SQL> create tablespace big datafile 'big.dbf' size 10 m blocksize 16k;
Tablespace created.
SQL> create index vidx on v (a, b, c) tablespace big;
Index created.
Gints Plivna
http://www.gplivna.eu
Message was edited by:
gintsp
Of course inserting a row was completely unnecessary :)

"Maximum Session Length in Seconds" Not Working In Apex 3.2

Hello.
I am using Apex 3.2 and have noticed that pages are session timing out after just 10 minutes of inactivity. I am aware of the new security attributes "Maximum Session Length in Seconds" and "Maximum Session Idle Time in Seconds".
I asked our Apex admin and he reported that these attributes are set to 8 hours on the instance level. Within my own Apex application, these two attributes are not set at all. According to the popup help window associated
with these attributes, if they are not set, then there is no timeout at all that is enforced.
So, does anyone know why my application pages are session timing out after just 10 minutes of inactivity and users are forced to login again?
Thank you.
Elie

Scott,
Thank you for your help on this.
I've uploaded my Apex app called "Online Model", App ID 62063 in my workspace EEG on the Oracle hosted site apex.oracle.com.
Workspace = EEG
Username = [email protected]
Password = galaxy (I'll change the password after you're done helping me)
Orginally, this app had "Database Authentication" set. I changed this to "DAD Authentication" so that you can simply run it without having to login.
If I open up the app in developer mode and simply leave it alone for, say, 30 minutes and then click on the "developer bar" to see the definition of one of the pages, Apex instead prompts me to re-login again into Apex. I've not placed any values in any of the "Session Timeout" fields on any of the pages in this app.
When the same app is run as a user (that is, no "developer bar" appears at bottom of pages), again the page will time out after about 30 minutes of in-activity.
And as mentioned in my original posting, our Apex Admin has the "Administrator Timeout Session" field set to 8 hours.
The Apex 3.2 docs say that if no value is placed in these Timeout Session fields, then there is no timeout imposed.
Thank you for your help. It's much appreciated.
Elie

SQL Plus command to print a report in Landscape format

Hi,
what is the SQL Plus command to print a report in Landscape format?

841731 wrote:
Hi,
what is the SQL Plus command to print a report in Landscape format?SQLPlus doesn't print, and it doesn't know about 'landscape' vs. 'portrait' any more than it knows about fonts. the only 'formatting' it knows is line size, page size. And all it does with line size is know where to insert a CR/LF pair (windows) or a CR (*nix). The only thing it knows to do with page size is repeat column headers.
The rest is up to whatever application you use to open the pure asciii text spool file.

Maximum record length in internal table?

Is there a maximum record length in an internal table? Please note: My question is NOT related to table space. I'm referring only to the length of an individual record (A.K.A. row length).
I am using a work area to insert data into an internal table. Both the work area and internal table are defined by the same structure.
The structure has a total length of 672 bytes. For the sake of this discussion I'll point out that at the end of the structure, bytes 669, 670, 671, and 672 are four separate fields of 1 character each.
When viewing the work area record in the debugger I'm seeing all the fields and all the values. When viewing the internal table in the debugger after a record is inserted, the internal table ends with the field defined at Byte 670. The internal table does not include the two fields defined at Bytes 671 and 672.
Am I to assume from the above explanation that the length of a record ( A.K.A. row) in an internal table cannot exceed 670 bytes?
Thank you.

Manish,
False alarm! While, technically, you didn't answer my question, your request for code ended up helping me answer my own question.
To provide you with some code I wrote a simple test program using the record layout referred to above, with a DO loop to put some records into the internal table, followed by a LOOP AT, with accompanying WRITE statements to display the contents of the internal table and demonstrate that the last two fields weren't being stored.
However, when I ran the test program, the last two fields were being displayed.
It was at that point, when stepping through the debugger that I noticed the scroll arrows above the last column of my internal table that allowed me to scroll to the right and see my final two fields.
Apparently, because of the large number of fields in my internal table I had reached the default display length of the debugger. While I was obviously aware of the scroll bar found at the bottom of the display, I had never worked with an internal table of that width in the past and hadn't even noticed the scroll arrows above the last column before.
Thanks for taking the time to respond helping me get to the solution.

DBMS_LOB 22288 Command Length Incorrect Error

I am trying to open a file (WIndows Server 2003) using DBMS_LOB and keep getting an error.
The code is:
CREATE OR REPLACE procedure LINECOST.btest is
abfile bfile := bfilename('ROUTING', 'database.xml');
begin
dbms_output.put_line(dbms_lob.getlength(abfile));
dbms_output.put_line(dbms_lob.fileisopen(abfile));
dbms_lob.fileopen(abfile);
end;
Error is:
ORA-22288 file or LOB operation failed
The program issued a command but the command length is incorrect.
ORA-06512: at SYS.DBMS_LOB, line 716
ORA-06512: at btest , line 5..
Would appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks,
Brett

I am getting the same error under Windows 2003 server. I beleive that it is due to Windows 2003 permissions in relation to the oracle user. Whio is the oracle user when a procedure is operating if the oracle userid is not a windows logon id?
Has anyone solved this problem?

ADAPTER.SOAP_EXCEPTION:Maximum request length exceeded.

Hi frnds,
Plz look for the error i am getting when sending large record...
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="PARSING">ADAPTER.SOAP_EXCEPTION</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText>soap fault: System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: There was an exception running the extensions specified in the config file. ---> System.Web.HttpException: Maximum request length exceeded. at System.Web.HttpRequest.GetEntireRawContent() at System.Web.HttpRequest.get_InputStream() at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapServerProtocol.Initialize() --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapServerProtocol.Initialize() at System.Web.Services.Protocols.ServerProtocol.SetContext(Type type, HttpContext context, HttpRequest request, HttpResponse response) at System.Web.Services.Protocols.ServerProtocolFactory.Create(Type type, HttpContext context, HttpRequest request, HttpResponse response, Boolean& abortProcessing)</SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack />
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
What could be the possible solution .
Thanks,
Adhir

Hi Ahdir,
First of all check the URL in your receiver SOAP adapter. The error comes from the web service server. It says that the request message is wrong.
U have to fill field SOAPAction in the receiver soap adapter
U may find the related information here
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/29/5bd93f130f9215e10000000a155106/content.htm
Please check this
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/03/23/rfc--xi--webservice--a-complete-walkthrough-part-1
There are multiple soap actions listed there.
Regards,
Divya

Maximum cable lengths for USB / FW / DVI & sVGA?

I've hunted around on the net and can't find any kind of definitive answer regarding maximum cable lengths for USB, Firewire 400/800 and DVI / sVGA monitors. Can anyone shed some light?
I'm about to shift my studio into a new room, and have the oppourtunity to stick my G5 and external drives into a corridor cupboard adjacent to where my studio is - in other words, noise free bliss! But....
...if I map out how far my computer monitors, keyboard and audio interface will be from the cupboard, and take into account the twists and turns involved in neat routing, I'm looking at a distance of about 10 meters. I need to know if any of these devices will be OK with such a long run of cable, and if not, if it's possible to achieve a good result using hubs or repeaters?
So, can anyone help me out with info on:
an Apogee Ensemble (Firewire 400)
an Apple keyboard (USB 2.0)
an LCD flatscreen (DVI)
and another LCD flatscreen (sVGA)
Many thanks!

I was just researching the very same thing, though it does not sound like my studio setup will be as sweet as yours. Here are a few things I ran across:
FIREWIRE-
"The maximum cable length specified by the IEEE1394 standard is 4.5 meters. However, more recent tests have shown that certain high quality firewire cables can achieve longer lengths without significantly affecting transmission quality. Several manufacturers sell firewire cables longer than 5 meters (some up to 50 meters)."
~http://www.focusrite.com/answerbase/article.php?id=206
I found an example of a company who claims to sell a firewire cable of that length:
http://www.expansys.com/pf.aspx?i=102956
USB-
There is forum discussion on the topic I was reading yesterday:
http://www.everythingusb.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=804
But don't go past the 11th post or so, they go off on another subject... the use of hubs & the words "active extension" in that post caught my eye. A quick google search came up with this site:
http://www.everythingusb.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=804
There were a bunch sites with devices claiming to do this.
Finally I have this chart, which seems to support what what the articles say, without of course any other extension technology/solutions:
http://www.extron.com/company/article.aspx?id=dedigform10
I'm not making any claims at all about how true these sources are, I just have the same questions and decided to toss what I've been looking at into the discussion. Feel free anyone to jump in and tell me its all wrong - I'd love to hear whats right.
~sam

SQL Maximum Command Length

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for