SQL Query taking long time....its very urgent !!!

Hi All,
Can any body help me out to tune this query... its cost is 62,900.. and thete is full table scan on ap_invoices_all...
For one invoice ID its taking 20 sccs...
SELECT /*+ INDEX ( i2 AP_INVOICES_N8 ) INDEX ( i1 AP_INVOICES_N8 ) */ DISTINCT ou.name operating_unit,
NVL(SUBSTR(UPPER(TRANSLATE(i1.invoice_num,'a!@#\/-_$%^&*.','a')),
1,:P_MATCH_LENGTH),'NomatchKluDge1') match_string,
UPPER(v.vendor_name) upper_supplier_name,
i1.invoice_num invoice_number,
to_char(i1.invoice_date,'DD-MON-YYYY') invoice_date,
--i1.invoice_date invoice_date,
NVL(i1.invoice_amount,0) invoice_amount,
i1.invoice_currency_code currency_code,
v.segment1 supplier_number,
v.vendor_name supplier_name,
ssa.vendor_site_code supplier_code,
lc.displayed_field invoice_type,
poh.segment1 po_number,
(select min(por.release_num)
from po_releases_all por
where poh.po_header_id = por.po_header_id) release_num,
gcc.segment1 location,
i1.payment_method_code payment_method_code,
DECODE(LENGTH(TO_CHAR(aca.check_number)),9,aca.check_number,aca.doc_sequence_value) payment_doc_number
FROM ap_invoices_all i1,
ap_invoices_all i2,
ap_suppliers v ,
ap_supplier_sites_all ssa,
ap_lookup_codes lc,
/* (select distinct pha.SEGMENT1, i.PO_HEADER_ID, i.INVOICE_ID
from ap_invoice_lines_all i
,po_headers_all pha
where pha.PO_HEADER_ID = i.PO_HEADER_ID) poh, */
po_headers_all poh,
ap_invoice_lines_all ail,
ap_invoice_distributions_all aida,
gl_code_combinations gcc,
ap_checks_all aca,
ap_invoice_payments_all ipa,
hr_all_organization_units ou
WHERE i1.invoice_id <> i2.invoice_id
AND NVL(substr(upper(translate(i1.invoice_num,'a!@#\/-_$%^&*.','a')),
1,:P_MATCH_LENGTH),'NomatchKluDge1')
= NVL(substr(upper(translate(i2.invoice_num,'a!@#\/-_$%^&*.','a')),
1,:P_MATCH_LENGTH),'abcdefghijklm')
--AND i1.creation_date between :p_creation_date_from and :p_creation_date_to
AND i1.cancelled_date IS NULL
--AND i2.creation_date between :p_creation_date_from and :p_creation_date_to
AND i2.cancelled_date IS NULL
AND i1.invoice_amount = nvl(i2.invoice_amount,-1)
--AND i1.vendor_id      = i2.vendor_id
AND i1.vendor_id+0 = i2.vendor_id+0
AND nvl(i1.vendor_id,-1) = v.vendor_id
AND i1.invoice_id = aida.invoice_id
AND aida.distribution_line_number = 1
AND gcc.code_combination_id = aida.dist_code_combination_id
AND     lc.lookup_code (+)      = i1.invoice_type_lookup_code
AND     lc.lookup_type (+)      = 'INVOICE TYPE'
AND i1.vendor_site_id = ssa.vendor_site_id(+)
--AND i1.invoice_id = poh.invoice_id (+)
AND i1.invoice_id = ail.invoice_id
--AND ail.line_number = 1
AND aida.INVOICE_LINE_NUMBER = 1
--AND ail.po_header_id = poh.po_header_id (+)
AND ail.po_header_id = poh.po_header_id
AND ail.INVOICE_ID = aida.INVOICE_ID
and ail.LINE_NUMBER = aida.INVOICE_LINE_NUMBER
AND i1.invoice_id = ipa.invoice_id(+)
AND ipa.check_id = aca.check_id(+)
AND i1.org_id = ou.organization_id
and i1.invoice_id = 123456
ORDER BY upper(v.vendor_name),
NVL(substr(upper(translate(i1.invoice_num,'a!@#\/-_$%^&*.','a')),
1,:P_MATCH_LENGTH),'abcdefghijklm'),
upper(i1.invoice_num);
Regards
--Harry

I tried to rewrite this query to format it into something more readable. Since I can't test, this may have introduced syntax errors:
SELECT /*+ INDEX ( i2 AP_INVOICES_N8 ) INDEX ( i1 AP_INVOICES_N8 )   */
       DISTINCT ou.name                             operating_unit,
       NVL(SUBSTR(UPPER(TRANSLATE(i1.invoice_num,
                        'a!@#\/-_$%^&*.','a')),
           1,:P_MATCH_LENGTH),'NomatchKluDge1')     match_string,
       UPPER(v.vendor_name)                         upper_supplier_name,
       i1.invoice_num                               invoice_number,
       to_char(i1.invoice_date,'DD-MON-YYYY')       invoice_date,
       NVL(i1.invoice_amount,0)                     invoice_amount,
       i1.invoice_currency_code                     currency_code,
       v.segment1                                   supplier_number,
       v.vendor_name                                supplier_name,
       ssa.vendor_site_code                         supplier_code,
       lc.displayed_field                           invoice_type,
       poh.segment1                                 po_number,
       (SELECT MIN(por.release_num)
        FROM   po_releases_all por
        WHERE poh.po_header_id = por.po_header_id) release_num,
       gcc.segment1                                 location,
       i1.payment_method_code                       payment_method_code,
       DECODE(LENGTH(TO_CHAR(aca.check_number)),9,
          aca.check_number,aca.doc_sequence_value) payment_doc_number
FROM   ap_invoices_all i1
       INNER JOIN ap_invoices_all i2
         ON   i1.invoice_id = i2.invoice_id
         AND i1.invoice_amount = NVL(i2.invoice_amount,-1)
         AND i1.vendor_id+0 = i2.vendor_id+0
       INNER JOIN ap_suppliers v
         ON    NVL(i1.vendor_id,-1) = v.vendor_id
       INNER JOIN ap_lookup_codes lc,
         ON lc.lookup_code = i1.invoice_type_lookup_code
       INNER JOIN ap_invoice_distributions_all aida
          ON    i1.invoice_id = aida.invoice_id
       INNER JOIN gl_code_combinations gcc
         ON     gcc.code_combination_id = aida.dist_code_combination_id
       INNER JOIN ap_invoice_lines_all ail
         ON     i1.invoice_id = ail.invoice_id
       INNER JOIN po_headers_all poh
         ON     ail.po_header_id = poh.po_header_id
       INNER JOIN hr_all_organization_units ou
         ON     i1.org_id = ou.organization_id
       LEFT JOIN (ap_invoice_payments_all ipa
                   INNER JOIN ap_checks_all aca
                     ON ipa.check_id = aca.check_id)
         ON     i1.invoice_id = ipa.invoice_id
       LEFT JOIN ap_supplier_sites_all ssa,
         ON i1.vendor_site_id = ssa.vendor_site_id
WHERE NVL(substr(upper(translate(i1.invoice_num,'a!@#\/-_%^&*.','a')),
            1,:P_MATCH_LENGTH),'NomatchKluDge1')
           = NVL(substr(upper(translate(i2.invoice_num,'a!@#\/-_$%^&*.','a')),
            1,:P_MATCH_LENGTH),'abcdefghijklm')
AND    i1.cancelled_date IS NULL
AND    i2.cancelled_date IS NULL
AND    aida.distribution_line_number = 1
AND    aida.INVOICE_LINE_NUMBER = 1
AND    ail.LINE_NUMBER = 1
AND    lc.lookup_type = 'INVOICE TYPE'
AND    i1.invoice_id = 123456
ORDER BY upper(v.vendor_name),
         NVL(substr(upper(translate(i1.invoice_num,'a!@#\/-_$%^&*.','a')),
          1,:P_MATCH_LENGTH),'abcdefghijklm'),
         upper(i1.invoice_num);I dislike queries in the SELECT clause like the one you have to get RELEASE_NUM. One thing in particular that I see about this on is that this appears to be the only place that anything from the PO_HEADERS_ALL table is used. PO_HEADERS_ALL is only in the query pulled in by the AP_INVOICE_LINES_ALL table. Since the JOIN column used for that is PO_HEADER_ID and that's the same one used in the SELECT clause query, do you really even need the PO_HEADERS_ALL table? This would remove one join at least.
Your query had "AND aida.INVOICE_LINE_NUMBER = 1" and "AND ail.LINE_NUMBER = aida.INVOICE_LINE_NUMBER". The second needn't reference AIDA, I changed it to "AND ail.LINE_NUMBER = 1". It likely won't make a performance impact, but the SQL is clearer.

Similar Messages

Sql query taking long time

the below query is taking very long time.
select /*+ PARALLEL(a,8) PARALLEL(b,8) */ a.personid,a.winning_id, b.questionid from
winning_id_cleanup a , rm_personquestion b
where a.personid = b.personid and (a.winning_id,b.questionid) not in
(select /*+ PARALLEL(c,8) */ c.personid,c.questionid from rm_personquestion c where c.personid=a.winning_id);
where the rm_personquestion table is having 45 million rows and winning_id_cleanup is having 1 million rows.
please tell me how to tune this query?

Please post u'r query at PL/SQL
It's not for SQL and PL/SQL

SQL Query taking longer time as seen from Trace file

Below Query Execution timings:
Any help will be benefitial as its affecting business needs.
SELECT MATERIAL_DETAIL_ID
FROM
GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS WHERE BATCH_ID = :B1 FOR UPDATE OF ACTUAL_QTY NOWAIT
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.70 0 0 0 0
Execute 2256 8100.00 24033.51 627 12298 31739 0
Fetch 2256 900.00 949.82 0 12187 0 30547
total 4513 9000.00 24984.03 627 24485 31739 30547
Thanks and Regards

Thanks Buddy.
Data Collected from Trace file:
SELECT STEP_CLOSE_DATE
FROM
GME_BATCH_STEPS WHERE BATCH_ID
IN (SELECT
DISTINCT BATCH_ID FROM
GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS START WITH BATCH_ID = :B2 CONNECT BY PRIOR PHANTOM_ID=BATCH_ID)
AND NVL(STEP_CLOSE_DATE, :B1) > :B1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.54 0 0 0 0
Execute 2256 800.00 1120.32 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2256 9100.00 13551.45 396 77718 0 0
total 4513 9900.00 14672.31 396 77718 0 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 66 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
0 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GME_BATCH_STEPS
13160 NESTED LOOPS
6518 VIEW
6518 SORT UNIQUE
53736 CONNECT BY WITH FILTERING
30547 NESTED LOOPS
30547 INDEX RANGE SCAN GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS_U1 (object id 146151)
30547 TABLE ACCESS BY USER ROWID GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS
23189 NESTED LOOPS
53736 BUFFER SORT
53736 CONNECT BY PUMP
23189 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS
23189 INDEX RANGE SCAN GME_MATERIAL_DETAILS_U1 (object id 146151)
4386 INDEX RANGE SCAN GME_BATCH_STEPS_U1 (object id 146144)
In the Package there are lots of SQL Statements using CONNECT BY CLAUSE.
Does the use of CONNECT BY Clause degrades performance?
As you can see the Rows Section is 0 but the Query and elapsed time is taking longer
Regards

Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours

Hi ,
Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours please find the query and explain plan details below even indexes avilable on table's goe's to FULL TABLE SCAN. please suggest me.......
SQL> explain plan for select a.account_id,round(a.account_balance,2) account_balance,
2 nvl(ah.invoice_id,ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
to_char(ah.effective_start_date,'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date,
to_date('30-12-9999','dd-mm-yyyy')),'DD-MON-YYYY')
due_date, ah.current_balance-ah.previous_balance amount,
decode(ah.invoice_id,null,'A','I') transaction_type
3 4 5 6 7 8 from account a,account_history ah,invoice i_+
where a.account_id=ah.account_id
and a.account_type_id=1000002
and round(a.account_balance,2) > 0
and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
and ah.invoice_id=i.invoice_id(+)
AND a.account_balance > 0
order by a.account_id,ah.effective_start_date desc; 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 544K| 30M| | 693K (20)|
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 544K| 30M| 75M| 693K (20)|
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 544K| 30M| | 689K (20)|
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ACCOUNT | 20080 | 294K| | 6220 (18)|
|* 4 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 131M| 5532M| 5155M| 678K (20)|
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ACCOUNT_HISTORY | 131M| 3646M| | 197K (25)|
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| INVOICE | 262M| 3758M| | 306K (18)|
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("A"."ACCOUNT_ID"="AH"."ACCOUNT_ID")
3 - filter("A"."ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID"=1000002 AND "A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE">0 AND
ROUND("A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE",2)>0)
4 - access("AH"."INVOICE_ID"="I"."INVOICE_ID"(+))
5 - filter("AH"."CURRENT_BALANCE">"AH"."PREVIOUS_BALANCE" AND ("AH"."INVOICE_ID"
IS NOT NULL OR "AH"."ADJUSTMENT_ID" IS NOT NULL))
22 rows selected.
Index Details:+_
SQL> select INDEX_OWNER,INDEX_NAME,COLUMN_NAME,TABLE_NAME from dba_ind_columns where
2 table_name in ('INVOICE','ACCOUNT','ACCOUNT_HISTORY') order by 4;
INDEX_OWNER INDEX_NAME COLUMN_NAME TABLE_NAME
OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT CUSTOMER_NODE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_ACCOUNT_TYPE ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_PREVIOUS_INVOICE PREVIOUS_INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_ACCOUNT LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE_ACCOUNT INVOICE_ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT SEQNR ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA CURRENT_BALANCE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_LMOD LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_PAYMENT PAYMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_APPLIED_DT APPLIED_DATE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_INVOICE INVOICE_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE CUSTOMER_INVOICE_STR INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_INVOICE LAST_MODIFIED INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_BILL_RUN BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_INVOICE_TYPE INVOICE_TYPE_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_CUSTOMER_NODE CUSTOMER_NODE_ID INVOICE
32 rows selected.
Regards,
Bathula
Oracle-DBA

I have some suggestions. But first, you realize that you have some redundant indexes, right? You have an index on account(account_name) and also account(account_name, account_id), and also account_history(invoice_id) and account_history(invoice_id, adjustment_id). No matter, I will suggest some new composite indexes.
Also, you do not need two lines for these conditions:
and round(a.account_balance, 2) > 0
AND a.account_balance > 0
You can just use: and a.account_balance >= 0.005
So the formatted query isselect a.account_id,
       round(a.account_balance, 2) account_balance,
       nvl(ah.invoice_id, ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
       to_char(ah.effective_start_date, 'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
       to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date, to_date('30-12-9999', 'dd-mm-yyyy')),
               'DD-MON-YYYY') due_date,
       ah.current_balance - ah.previous_balance amount,
       decode(ah.invoice_id, null, 'A', 'I') transaction_type
from account a, account_history ah, invoice i
where a.account_id = ah.account_id
   and a.account_type_id = 1000002
   and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
   and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
   and ah.invoice_id = i.invoice_id(+)
   AND a.account_balance >= .005
order by a.account_id, ah.effective_start_date desc;You will probably want to select:
1. From ACCOUNT first (your smaller table), for which you supply a literal on account_type_id. That should limit the accounts retrieved from ACCOUNT_HISTORY
2. From ACCOUNT_HISTORY. We want to limit the records as much as possible on this table because of the outer join.
3. INVOICE we want to access last because it seems to be least restricted, it is the biggest, and it has the outer join condition so it will manufacture rows to match as many rows as come back from account_history.
Try the query above after creating the following composite indexes. The order of the columns is important:create index account_composite_i on account(account_type_id, account_balance, account_id);
create index acct_history_comp_i on account_history(account_id, invoice_id, adjustment_id, current_balance, previous_balance, effective_start_date);
create index invoice_composite_i on invoice(invoice_id, payment_due_date);All the columns used in the where clause will be indexed, in a logical order suited to the needs of the query. Plus each selected column is indexed as well so that we should not need to touch the tables at all to satisfy the query.
Try the query after creating these indexes.
A final suggestion is to try larger sort and hash area sizes and a manual workarea policy.alter session set workarea_size_policy = manual;
alter session set sort_area_size = 2147483647;
alter session set hash_area_size = 2147483647;

SQL Query Executing longer time

Hi , The below SQL query executing longer time . Please help to Improve the query performance. The query continuously running for more than 24 hours and failing with roolback segment error. Not getting the final output. Most of the tables are having milions of records.
Select distinct
IBS.ADSL_ACCESS_INFO,
IBS.LIJ ,
regexp_substr(OBVS.REFERENTIE_A,'[[:digit:]]+') as O_NUMBER,
DBS.CKR_NUMMER_CONTRACTANT,
DBS.DNUMBER
FROM CD.IBS,
CD.OIBL,
CD.IH,
CD.ODL,
CD.OH,
CD.DBS,
CD.OBVS
Where IBS.END_DT = To_Date('31129999', 'ddmmyyyy')
AND OIBL.END_DT = to_date('31129999', 'ddmmyyyy')
AND DBS.END_DT = to_date('31129999', 'ddmmyyyy')
AND OBVS.END_DT = to_date('31129999', 'ddmmyyyy')
AND OBVS.REFERENTIE_A LIKE 'OFM%'
AND OIBL.INFRA_KEY = IH.INFRA_KEY
AND OIBL.ORDERS_KEY = OH.ORDERS_KEY
AND IBS.INFH_ID = IH.INFH_ID
AND ODL.ORDH_ID = OH.ORDH_ID
AND DBS.DEBH_ID = ODL.DEBH_ID
AND OBVS.ORDH_ID = ODL.ORDH_ID
Order By IBS.LIJ
All the columns which are present in the where condition are having either Index/key (Primary/unique) except END_DT column.
Please Advise

Predicate pushing can help when it greatlly restricts the number of rows - you must experiment - might not work with all predicates pushed (as shown here)
select distinct
       ibs.adsl_access_info,
       ibs.lij,
       obvs.o_number,
       dbs.ckr_nummer_contractant,
       dbs.dnumber
from (select infh_id,adsl_access_info,lij
          from cd.ibs
         where end_dt = to_date('31129999','ddmmyyyy')
       ) ibs,
       (select infra_key,orders_key
          from cd.oibl
         where end_dt = to_date('31129999','ddmmyyyy')
       ) oibl,
       (select ordh_id,regexp_substr(obvs.referentie_a,'[[:digit:]]+') as o_number
          from cd.obvs
         where end_dt = to_date('31129999','ddmmyyyy')
           and referentie_a like 'OFM%'
       ) obvs,
       (select debh_id,ckr_nummer_contractant,dnumber
          from cd.dbs
         where end_dt = to_date('31129999','ddmmyyyy')
       ) dbs,
       cd.ih,
       cd.odl,
       cd.oh
where oibl.infra_key = ih.infra_key
   and oibl.orders_key = oh.orders_key
   and ibs.infh_id = ih.infh_id
   and odl.ordh_id = oh.ordh_id
   and dbs.debh_id = odl.debh_id
   and obvs.ordh_id = odl.ordh_id
order by ibs.lijRegards
Etbin

SQL SELECT Query Help ..Please its very Urgent!!

Hi All,
I am having Oracle Database whice is storing 1000's of records daily.
I need to select some information based on date and time.
I am having two coloumns for Date and time. The first column(testDate) of type Date stores date as MM/DD/YY format and the second column(testTime)of type Numeric stores the time in seconds.
The Example data is :
testDate ------=-- testTime
11/12/2002 --- 35000
11/12/2002 --- 43000
11/12/2002 --- 45000
11/12/2002 --- 75000
11/13/2002 --- 2000
11/13/2002 --- 3500
11/13/2002 --- 4300
11/13/2002 --- 9800
11/13/2002 --- 23000
11/14/2002 --- 5000
11/14/2002 --- 10000
11/14/2002 --- 15000
How can i write a SELECT Query to get the records of specific date and seconds to next day specific date and seconds.I mean i want all the records between 11/12/2002 --- 43000 seconds to 11/14/2002 --- 1000 seconds.
If any one helps me in this regard iam very thank full to them.Its very urgent for me.
Thanks

Hi m7nra,
I used the query as
SELECT * FROM table
WHERE testDate + (testTime/(24*60*60)) BETWEEN TO_DATE('MM/DD/YYYY','12.11.2002') AND TO_DATE('MM/DD/YYYY','14.11.2002')
its giving DATE FORMAT NOT RECOGNIZED error.
The Example data is :
testDate ------=-- testTime
11/12/2002 --- 35000
11/12/2002 --- 43000
11/12/2002 --- 45000
11/12/2002 --- 75000
11/13/2002 --- 2000
11/13/2002 --- 3500
11/13/2002 --- 4300
11/13/2002 --- 9800
11/13/2002 --- 23000
11/14/2002 --- 5000
11/14/2002 --- 10000
11/14/2002 --- 15000
infact i need all the records between 11/12/2002 --- 43000 seconds to 11/14/2002 --- 1000 seconds.
Please help me to find a full query beacuse iam very new to Oracle.
Thanks,
S R Mannava

Query taking long time to run.

The following query is taking long time to run, is there anything can be done to make it run faster by changing the sql etc.
select distinct
A.DEPTID,
A.POSITION_NBR,
A.EMPLID,
A.EMPL_RCD_NBR,
A.EFFDT,
B.NAME,
A.EMPL_STATUS,
A.JOBCODE,
A.ANNUAL_RT,
A.STD_HOURS,
A.PRIMARY_JOB,
C.POSN_STATUS,
case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then 0 else C.STD_HOURS end,
case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then ' ' else C.DEPTID end
from PS_JOB A,
PS_PERSONAL_DATA B,
PS_POSITION_DATA C
where A.EMPLID = B.EMPLID
and
((A.POSITION_NBR = C.POSITION_NBR
and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(D.EFFSEQ)
from PS_JOB D
where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT)
and C.POSN_STATUS <> 'G'
and C.EFFDT = (select max(E.EFFDT)
from PS_POSITION_DATA E
where E.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
and E.EFFDT <= A.EFFDT)
and C.EFFSEQ = (select max(F.EFFSEQ)
from PS_POSITION_DATA F
where F.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
and F.EFFDT = C.EFFDT))
or
(A.POSITION_NBR = C.POSITION_NBR
and A.EFFDT = (select max(D.EFFDT)
from PS_JOB D
where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
and D.EFFDT <= C.EFFDT)
and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(E.EFFSEQ)
from PS_JOB E
where E.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
and E.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
and E.EFFDT = A.EFFDT)
and C.POSN_STATUS <> 'G'
and C.EFFSEQ = (select max(F.EFFSEQ)
from PS_POSITION_DATA F
where F.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
and F.EFFDT = C.EFFDT)))
or
(A.POSITION_NBR = ' '
and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(E.EFFSEQ)
from PS_JOB D
where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
and E.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT)))

Using distributive law A and (B or C) = (A and B) or (A and C) from right to left we can have:
select distinct A.DEPTID,A.POSITION_NBR,A.EMPLID,A.EMPL_RCD_NBR,A.EFFDT,B.NAME,A.EMPL_STATUS,
                A.JOBCODE,A.ANNUAL_RT,A.STD_HOURS,A.PRIMARY_JOB,C.POSN_STATUS,
                case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then 0 else C.STD_HOURS end,
                case when A.POSITION_NBR = ' ' then ' ' else C.DEPTID end
from PS_JOB A,PS_PERSONAL_DATA B,PS_POSITION_DATA C
where A.EMPLID = B.EMPLID
   and (
         A.POSITION_NBR = C.POSITION_NBR
     and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(D.EFFSEQ)
                       from PS_JOB D
                      where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
                        and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
                        and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT
     and C.EFFSEQ = (select max(F.EFFSEQ)
                       from PS_POSITION_DATA E
                      where E.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
                        and E.EFFDT = C.EFFDT
     and C.POSN_STATUS != 'G'
     and (
           C.EFFDT = (select max(E.EFFDT)
                        from PS_POSITION_DATA E
                       where E.POSITION_NBR = A.POSITION_NBR
                         and E.EFFDT <= A.EFFDT
       or
           A.EFFDT = (select max(D.EFFDT)
                        from PS_JOB D
                       where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
                         and D.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
                         and D.EFFDT <= C.EFFDT
     or
         A.POSITION_NBR = ' '
           and A.EFFSEQ = (select max(E.EFFSEQ)
                             from PS_JOB D
                            where D.EMPLID = A.EMPLID
                              and E.EMPL_RCD_NBR = A.EMPL_RCD_NBR
                              and D.EFFDT = A.EFFDT
       )may not help much as the optimizer might have guessed it already
Regards
Etbin

Sql code taking long time

Hello Everyone,
In Oracle 10g,I have table emp_history and column name hired_date,which has the
values in the following format 7/8/2011 12:55:55 PM
('mm/dd/yyyy hh12:mi:ss AM') ana this table has more than 50 thousand records,
when I tried to get the employees whose hired_date between 01/04/2011 and 30/04/2011
its taking long time(16 to 19 minutes) just to fetch 845 records.
I tried the following codes,
select * from emp_history where to_char(hired_date,'mmddyyyy') between
04012011' and 04302011' and ...;and
select * from emp_history where to_char(hired_date,'ddmmyyyy') between
'01042011' and 30042011' and ....It having some other where condition also but If I commented the above where condition alone its working fine,
If I include i taking long time.
Can anyone tell me how to modify the code.
Thank you.
Edited by: Gurujothi on Aug 3, 2012 4:21 AM

Do you have an index on HIRED_DATE column? If yes then your index will not be considered.
You need to write your query like this.
select *
from emp_history
where hired_date between to_date('04012011', 'mmddyyyy') and (to_date('04302011', 'mmddyyyy') + 1) - interval '1' second
and ...;Use of function on a column makes that column index unusable.
Further to assist you please read the following link and post the required details
{message:id=9360003}

Sap bi--query taking long time to exexute

Hi
When i try run the bex query ,its taking long time,please suggest
Thanks
sreedhar

Hi
When i try run the bex query ,its taking long time,please suggest
Thanks
sreedhar

CDHDR table query taking long time

Hi all,
Select query from CDHDR table is taking long time,in where condition i am giving OBJECTCLASS = 'MAT_FULL' udate = sy-datum and langu = 'EN'.
any suggestion to improve the performance.i want to select all the article which got changed on current date
regards
shibu

This will always be slow for large data volumes, since CDHDR is designed for quick access by object ID (in this case material number), not by date.
I'm afraid you would need to introduce a secondary index on OBJECTCLAS and UDATE, if that query is crucial enough to warrant the additional disk space and processing time taken by the new index.
Greetings
Thomas

Query taking long time

Hi
I have a query in which, its a 3 table join but takes a long time to execute. I had checked with plan table.. it shows one of the table is FULL ACCESS.
I have 2 clarifications.
1. Will the status checking as NULL - (it shouldn't use index)
2. Is the case statements are recommended for queries.
Query
Select .........
FROM CLIENT LEFT OUTER JOIN INTERNET_LOGIN ON INTERNET_LOGIN.NUM_CLIENT_ID=CLIENT.NUM_CLIENT_ID,
POLI_MOT.
WHERE
POLI_MOT.NUM_CLIENT_ID=CLIENT.NUM_CLIENT_ID
AND
(POLI_MOT.CHR_CANCEL_STATUS='N'
OR
POLI_MOT.CHR_CANCEL_STATUS IS NULL)
AND
CLIENT.NUM_CONTACT_TYPE_ID IN (1,3)
AND
(NVL(POLI_MOT.VCH_NEW_IC_NO,'A') =
CASE WHEN (NVL(null,NULL) IS NULL) THEN
NVL(POLI_MOT.VCH_NEW_IC_NO,'A')
ELSE
NVL(null,NULL)
END
OR
POLI_MOT.VCH_OLD_IC_NO =
CASE WHEN nvl(null,null) IS NULL THEN
POLI_MOT.VCH_OLD_IC_NO
ELSE
NVL(null,NULL)
END )
AND POLI_MOT.VCH_POLICY_NO =
CASE WHEN UPPER(nvl(NULL,null)) IS NULL THEN
POLI_MOT.VCH_POLICY_NO
ELSE
NVL(NULL,NULL)
END
AND POLI_MOT.VCH_VEHICLE_NO =
CASE WHEN UPPER(NVL('123',NULL)) IS NULL THEN
POLI_MOT.VCH_VEHICLE_NO
ELSE
NVL('123',NULL)
END

Hi,
There is nothing wrong in having a full table access. When you do the explain plan please check for which table costs you the maximun. try to work on that table.
To tune the performance of your query you can try either indexing or parallel access.
the syntax for parallel index is
/*+ PARALLEL("TBL_NM",100) */(any number)...
for index please use the index name of the table you want to index..
regards
Bharath

Calling java from pl/sql in oracle 10g?its very urgent.

Hi Friends,
i hve simple java code:
class Hell
public static String Hello()
return"hello world";
& compile this code using javac & loaded Hell.class in to database using this command
c:\>loadjava -user chandru/shekar@pulser c:\Hell.class
& i wrote pl/sql like:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION Hell RETURN String as language java name 'Hell.Hello() return java.lang.String';
i will compile the code & run but at that time this error i am getting:
ORA-29516: Aurora assertion failure: Assertion failure at eox.c:317
Uncaught exception System error: java/lang/UnsupportedClassVersionError
I am using oracle 10g.Plzzzzzzzzz help me.Its very important to for me.
Is any path i hve to set for oracle 10g database.Plz any one help me.
regards
shekar

Hello here is how I solved the problem
Let us assume that i try to load the file Hello.Java into the user scott.
public class Hello {
     public static String world() {
          return "hello world";
1) Dropjava
You must drop the java class if you already have loaded the class onto the server.
dropjava -u scott/tiger Hello.class
2) load class on server and let the server compile the source code.
It is necessary to compile the source code on the server when the server and the local machine have different Java versions. To check which Java version there is running on the client machine open a command prompt and write Java -version
loadjava -user scott/tiger -resolve Hello.java
3) Publish stored procedure
sqlplus scott/tiger@oracle
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION helloworld RETURN VARCHAR2 AS                LANGUAGE JAVA NAME 'Hello.world () return java.lang.String';
4)Call stored procedure
VARIABLE myString VARCHAR2(20);
CALL helloworld() INTO :myString;
PRINT myString;
RGDS
Thomas Winterberg

Merge Query Taking Long time !!!

Hi all,
Im using loading type update/insert in one of my mappings.
mapping usually takes 3-4 mins to complete.
Suddenly It has taken 1 Hr to complete. If I take the select query from the mapping, its running fast and completes in 2 mins.
I Checked the source data count, Indexes in the source columns. Everything is the same
Mapping level, I didnt do any changes. Can anyone suggest what would be possible reason???
Thanks and Regards
Ela

Lots of things come into play when you're tuning a query.
An (unformatted) execution plan isn't enough.
Tuning takes time and understanding how (a lot of) things work, there is no ASAP in the world of tuning.
Please post other important details, like your database version, optimizer settings, how/when are table statistics gathered etc.
So, read the following informative threads (and please take your time, this really is important stuff), and adust your thread as needed.
That way you'll have a bigger chance of getting help that makes sense...
Your DBA should/ought to be able to help you in this as well.
Re: HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html

SQL execution taking long time

All,
I have a read only VO and i have configured the VO to print the SQL getting executed along with bind parameters. The SQL is taking a lot of time to execute when running in web. When i run the generated SQL in toad it takes close to 30.6 seconds, however on the page it is taking closed to 5 mins. In the logs i can see the sql getting printed, then the bind variable and then it stops for around 5-8 mins then proceeds.
Also my query fetches a max of 10 records in worst case else 2-3 always so i guess setting of range size is not going to work.
Any idea as to what is wrong in my case.
thnks
Jdev 11.1.1.5

Hi,
Do your query use index, if so then check that your binds have the same data type as columns in where clause and you don't do like
where upper(column_name) = :upper(bind1)

Query taking long time To Fectch the Results

Hi!
when I run the query,it takes too long time for fetching the resultsets.
Please find the query below for the same.
SELECT
A.BUSINESS_UNIT,
A.JOURNAL_ID,
TO_CHAR(A.JOURNAL_DATE,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
A.UNPOST_SEQ,
A.FISCAL_YEAR,
A.ACCOUNTING_PERIOD,
A.JRNL_HDR_STATUS,
C.INVOICE,
C.ACCT_ENTRY_TYPE,
C.LINE_DST_SEQ_NUM,
C.TAX_AUTHORITY_CD,
C.ACCOUNT,
C.MONETARY_AMOUNT,
D.BILL_SOURCE_ID,
D.IDENTIFIER,
D.VAT_AMT_BSE,
D.VAT_TRANS_AMT_BSE,
D.VAT_TXN_TYPE_CD,
D.TAX_CD_VAT,
D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT,
D.VAT_APPLICABILITY,
E.BILL_TO_CUST_ID,
E.BILL_STATUS,
E.BILL_CYCLE_ID,
TO_CHAR(E.INVOICE_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
TO_CHAR(E.ACCOUNTING_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
TO_CHAR(E.DT_INVOICED,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
E.ENTRY_TYPE,
E.ENTRY_REASON,
E.AR_LVL,
E.AR_DST_OPT,
E.AR_ENTRY_CREATED,
E.GEN_AR_ITEM_FLG,
E.GL_LVL, E.GL_ENTRY_CREATED,
(Case when c.account in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
'30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
'39100050','90100000')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 0 then 'Ej_Momskonto_med_moms'
When c.account not in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000',
'30490000','30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000',
'35160000','39100050','90100000')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 25 then 'Momskonto_utan_moms' end)
FROM
sysadm.PS_JRNL_HEADER A,
sysadm.PS_JRNL_LN B,
sysadm.PS_BI_ACCT_ENTRY C,
sysadm.PS_BI_LINE D,
sysadm.PS_BI_HDR E
WHERE A.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
AND A.JOURNAL_DATE BETWEEN TO_DATE('&From_date','YYYY-MM-DD')
AND TO_DATE('&To_date','YYYY-MM-DD')
AND A.SOURCE      = 'BI'
AND A.BUSINESS_UNIT = B.BUSINESS_UNIT
AND A.JOURNAL_ID      = B.JOURNAL_ID
AND A.JOURNAL_DATE = B.JOURNAL_DATE
AND A.UNPOST_SEQ      = B.UNPOST_SEQ
AND B.BUSINESS_UNIT = C.BUSINESS_UNIT
AND B.JOURNAL_ID = C.JOURNAL_ID
AND B.JOURNAL_DATE = C.JOURNAL_DATE
AND B.JOURNAL_LINE = C.JOURNAL_LINE
AND C.ACCT_ENTRY_TYPE = 'RR'
AND C.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
AND C.BUSINESS_UNIT = D.BUSINESS_UNIT
AND C.INVOICE = D.INVOICE
AND C.LINE_SEQ_NUM = D.LINE_SEQ_NUM
AND D.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
AND D.BUSINESS_UNIT = E.BUSINESS_UNIT
AND D.INVOICE = E.INVOICE
AND E.BUSINESS_UNIT = '&BU'
AND
((c.account in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
'30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
'39100050','90100000')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 0)
OR
(c.account not in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
'30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
'39100050','z')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 25)
GROUP BY
A.BUSINESS_UNIT,
A.JOURNAL_ID,
TO_CHAR(A.JOURNAL_DATE,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
A.UNPOST_SEQ, A.FISCAL_YEAR,
A.ACCOUNTING_PERIOD,
A.JRNL_HDR_STATUS,
C.INVOICE,
C.ACCT_ENTRY_TYPE,
C.LINE_DST_SEQ_NUM,
C.TAX_AUTHORITY_CD,
C.ACCOUNT,
D.BILL_SOURCE_ID,
D.IDENTIFIER,
D.VAT_TXN_TYPE_CD,
D.TAX_CD_VAT,
D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT,
D.VAT_APPLICABILITY,
E.BILL_TO_CUST_ID,
E.BILL_STATUS,
E.BILL_CYCLE_ID,
TO_CHAR(E.INVOICE_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
TO_CHAR(E.ACCOUNTING_DT,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
TO_CHAR(E.DT_INVOICED,'YYYY-MM-DD'),
E.ENTRY_TYPE, E.ENTRY_REASON,
E.AR_LVL, E.AR_DST_OPT,
E.AR_ENTRY_CREATED,
E.GEN_AR_ITEM_FLG,
E.GL_LVL,
E.GL_ENTRY_CREATED,
C.MONETARY_AMOUNT,
D.VAT_AMT_BSE,
D.VAT_TRANS_AMT_BSE
having
(Case when c.account in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000',
'30490000','30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000',
'35160000','39100050','90100000')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 0 then 'Ej_Momskonto_med_moms'
When c.account not in ('30120000','30180050','30190000','30290000','30490000',
'30690000','30900040','30990000','35100000','35120000','35150000','35160000',
'39100050','90100000')
and D.TAX_CD_VAT_PCT <> 25 then 'Momskonto_utan_moms' end) is not null
So Could you provide the solution to fix this issue?
Thanks
senthil

[url http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=501834&tstart=0]When your query takes too long ...
Regards,
Rob.

SQL Query taking long time....its very urgent !!!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for