SQL selecting group by but....

select count(empno) as total,dept from emp group by dept
total | dept
4 | 10
3 | 20
5 | 30
i want an another field with this to give me like this
employee_ _ Number|total | dept
121,122,123,124_ _ | 4 | 10
125,126,127_ _ _ _ | 3 | 20
129,130,131,132,133| 5 | 30
means i need list of empno seperated by comma with each group

Hi,
Fakhr-e-Alam wrote:
is there any built in function which give me
1-upto-4, 11-upto-14, 33,35, 40-upto-41....
instead of
1,2,3,4, 11,12,13,14, 33,35, 40,41...There's no single function that will take a set of 12 rows (or a list of 12 comma-separated items) such as 1,2,3,4, 11,12,13,14, 33,35, 40,41 and return a set of 5 rows (or items) like 1-upto-4, 11-upto-14, 33,35, 40-upto-41.
You can do it with various combinations of anlayitic and aggreagate functions.
If you'd like help, post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for your sample data, and the results you want from that data. Say whatever you know about the starting data. (For example, are the numbers distinct? Are they always integers?)
If you can show your problem using commonly available tables (like those in the scott schema), then you don't have to post any sample data; just the results, and an explanation of how you get those results from that data.
Always say which version of Oracle you're using.

Similar Messages

SQL select group by Query

Suppose a table T1 has 2 columns C1 and C2 and data as follows:
C1 C2
== ==
1 A1
1 A2
2 B1
2 B2
2 B3
3 C1
4 D1
4 D2
I want to write a SQL query to select data and display as follows (i.e. grouped by C1, but C2 should display as single field with say '-' seperator):
C1 C2-Details
== ========
1 A1-A2
2 B1-B2-B3
3 C1
4 D1-D2
Please help.
Thanks in advance
Goli

Your query maybe like this
SELECT c1,
LTRIM(MAX(SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(c2,'-'))
KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY curr),'-') AS employees
FROM (SELECT c1,
c2,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY c1 ORDER BY c2) AS curr,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY c1 ORDER BY c2) -1 AS prev
FROM t1)
GROUP BY c1
CONNECT BY prev = PRIOR curr AND c1 = PRIOR c1
START WITH curr = 1;

SQL Select grouping by value

Hi ,
I have an output after a join statement and i have output
which is like below.
I have an output containing two colums with same data except for the emp_depts and would like to write a select statement which will give a single row as opposed to two rows as below.
Current out put view.
emp_no emp_Name emp_Depts
1 Test HR
1 Test Finance
Desired output.
1 Test HR,Finance
Can some one please help.

If you are on 10g:
SQL> create table mytable
2 as
3 select 1 emp_no, 'Test' emp_Name, 'HR' emp_Depts from dual union all
4 select 1, 'Test', 'Finance' from dual
5 /
Tabel is aangemaakt.
SQL> with t as
2 ( select emp_no,emp_name,substr(ed,2) emp_depts,rn
3      from mytable
4     model
5           partition by (emp_no,emp_name)
6           dimension by (row_number() over (partition by emp_no order by null) rn)
7           measures (cast(emp_depts as varchar2(50)) ed)
8           rules
9           ( ed[any] order by rn desc = ed[cv()+1] || ',' || ed[cv()]
10           )
11 )
12 select emp_no
13       , emp_name
14       , emp_depts
15    from t
16   where rn = 1
17 /
    EMP_NO EMP_ EMP_DEPTS
         1 Test HR,Finance
1 rij is geselecteerd.And this technique is not called pivoting, but string aggregation. If you search for this term you will see some other techniques as well.
Regards,
Rob.

I need to Sync/change my iPhone contacts but I can't select "Selected Groups"...?

I need to Sync/change my iPhone contacts but I can't select "Selected Groups"...?

This is what worked for me. Turned off icloud on iphone and computer. Logged into my icloud account at icloud.com via my web browser and deleted all of my contacts and calendars. I was then able to select selected contacts and selected calendars in iTunes.

Sql select query problem

hi friends,
i've a view called "risk_efforts" with fields user_id,user_name,wknd_dt,week_day,prod_efforts,unprod_efforts.
Name Type
ROW_ID NUMBER
USER_ID VARCHAR2(14)
USER_NAME VARCHAR2(50)
WKND_DT VARCHAR2(8)
WEEK_DAY VARCHAR2(250)
PROD_EFFORTS NUMBER
UNPROD_EFFORTS NUMBER
data is like this:
when there is some data in prod_efforts, unprod_efforts will be null
when there is some data in unprod_efforts, prod_efforts will be null
for example:
USER_ID     USER_NAME     WKND_DT     WEEK_DAY     PROD_EFFORTS     UNPROD_EFFORTS
G666999     GTest     20100403     TUE     null 3
G666999     GTest     20100403     TUE     14     null
now i want to combine these 2 rows into 1 row i.e o/p should be like this
USER_ID     USER_NAME     WKND_DT     WEEK_DAY     PROD_EFFORTS     UNPROD_EFFORTS
G666999     GTest     20100403     TUE     14 3
i've tried all combinations but couldn't get the query. Please help me with the exact SQL select query.
thanks,
Girish

Welcome to the forum.
First read this:
Urgency in online postings
Secondly, it's always helpful to provide the following:
1. Oracle version (SELECT * FROM V$VERSION)
2. Sample data in the form of CREATE / INSERT statements.
3. Expected output
4. Explanation of expected output (A.K.A. "business logic")
5. Use \ tags for #2 and #3. See FAQ (Link on top right side) for details.
You have provided #3 and #4. However with no usable form of sample data forum members will often not respond as quickly as they could if you provided #2.
I'm just wagering a guess here but what about this:SELECT ROW_ID
, USER_ID
, WKND_DT
, WEEK_DAY
, MAX(PROD_EFFORTS) AS PROD_EFFORTS
, MAX(UNPROD_EFFORTS) AS UNPROD_EFFORTS
FROM RISK_EFFORTS
GROUP BY ROW_ID
, USER_ID
, WKND_DT
, WEEK_DAY

Oracle's SQL select should have a syntax like this

Oracles SQL is very powerful but lacks a basic thing the LIMIT and OFFSET syntax which
is present in postgres sql, I recommend oracle to support this syntax in future release.
more details of this syntax can be found at :
http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?sql-select.html
SELECT [ ALL | DISTINCT [ ON ( expression [, ...] ) ] ]
* | expression [ AS output_name ] [, ...]
[ FROM from_item [, ...] ]
[ WHERE condition ]
[ GROUP BY expression [, ...] ]
[ HAVING condition [, ...] ]
[ { UNION | INTERSECT | EXCEPT } [ ALL ] select ]
[ ORDER BY expression [ ASC | DESC | USING operator ] [, ...] ]
[ FOR UPDATE [ OF tablename [, ...] ] ]
[ LIMIT { count | ALL } ]
[ OFFSET start ]

I've executed the above queries against my table and the results follows :
The structure of the table
Name Null? Type
FATWAID NOT NULL NUMBER(11)
FATWASTATUS NUMBER(1)
SUBJ_NO NUMBER(4)
LANG CHAR(1)
SCHOLAR NUMBER(2)
REVIEWER NUMBER(2)
AUDITOR NUMBER(2)
PUBLISHER NUMBER(2)
SUBSCRIBER NUMBER(2)
ENTRY NUMBER(2)
FATWATITLE VARCHAR2(100)
FATWATEXT CLOB
FATWADATE DATE
TRANSLATE CHAR(1)
SELECTED NUMBER(1)
SUBJ_MAIN NUMBER(4)
I have set timing on and executed each query above, following are the statistics.
First the number of rows in the table.
SQL>set timing on
SQL>select count (*) from fatwa;
COUNT(*)
1179651
Elapsed: 00:00:13.05
The query of Andrew Clarke
SQL>SELECT fatwaid FROM (SELECT fatwaid, rownum as ranking FROM fatwa) r
WHERE r.ranking BETWEEN &OFFSET AND &LIMIT
SQL>/
Enter value for offset: 100000
Enter value for limit: 100009
old 2: WHERE r.ranking BETWEEN &OFFSET AND &LIMIT
new 2: WHERE r.ranking BETWEEN 100000 AND 100009
FATWAID
96592
96593
96594
96595
96596
96597
96598
96599
96600
96601
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:12.02
SQL> /
Enter value for offset: 1000000
Enter value for limit: 1000009
old 2: WHERE r.ranking BETWEEN &OFFSET AND &LIMIT
new 2: WHERE r.ranking BETWEEN 1000000 AND 1000009
FATWAID
994621
994622
994623
994624
994625
994626
995769
995770
995771
995772
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:12.00
The response time is decreasing because of use of bind variables,
but 12 seconds is a sign of poor performance.
Now a slight modification to Clarke's query
I will add order by clause
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 SELECT fatwaid FROM (SELECT fatwaid, rownum as ranking FROM fatwa ORDER BY fatwaid) r
2* WHERE r.ranking BETWEEN &OFFSET AND &LIMIT
SQL> /
Enter value for offset: 100001
Enter value for limit: 100010
old 2: WHERE r.ranking BETWEEN &OFFSET AND &LIMIT
new 2: WHERE r.ranking BETWEEN 100001 AND 100010
FATWAID
100032
100033
100034
100035
100036
100037
100038
100039
100040
100041
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:04.00 -- time reduced from 12 to 4 seconds
A time of 4 seconds is acceptable but not good,
response time should be in milli seconds.
SQL> /
Enter value for offset: 1000001
Enter value for limit: 1000010
old 2: WHERE r.ranking BETWEEN &OFFSET AND &LIMIT
new 2: WHERE r.ranking BETWEEN 1000001 AND 1000010
FATWAID
1000032
1000033
1000034
1000035
1000036
1000037
1000038
1000039
1000040
1000041
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:03.09 -- this reduction is because of bind variables
The query of Chris Gates
SQL>select fatwaid
2 from ( select a.*, rownum r
3 from ( select *
4 from fatwa
5 --where x = :host_variable
6 order by fatwaid ) a
7 where rownum < &HigerBound )
8 where r > &LowerBound
SQL> /
Enter value for higerbound: 100011
old 7: where rownum < &HigerBound )
new 7: where rownum < 100011 )
Enter value for lowerbound: 100000
old 8: where r > &LowerBound
new 8: where r > 100000
FATWAID
100032
100033
100034
100035
100036
100037
100038
100039
100040
100041
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.04
This seems to be fast
SQL> /
Enter value for higerbound: 1000011
old 7: where rownum < &HigerBound )
new 7: where rownum < 1000011 )
Enter value for lowerbound: 1000000
old 8: where r > &LowerBound
new 8: where r > 1000000
FATWAID
1000032
1000033
1000034
1000035
1000036
1000037
1000038
1000039
1000040
1000041
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:01:14.02
but this is worst when upper bound is 1 million.
Finally Myers query
SQL> select fatwaid from
2 (select /*+ INDEX(fawtaid pk_fatwa) */ fatwaid, rownum x from fatwa
3 where rownum < &UpperBound )
4 where x > &LowerBound;
Enter value for upperbound: 100011
old 3: where rownum < &UpperBound )
new 3: where rownum < 100011 )
Enter value for lowerbound: 100000
old 4: where x > &LowerBound
new 4: where x > 100000
FATWAID
122418
122419
122420
122421
122422
122423
122424
122425
122426
122427
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03 -- too fast
SQL> /
Enter value for upperbound: 1000011
old 3: where rownum < &UpperBound )
new 3: where rownum < 1000011 )
Enter value for lowerbound: 1000000
old 4: where x > &LowerBound
new 4: where x > 1000000
FATWAID
984211
984212
984213
984214
984215
984216
984217
984218
984219
984220
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:02.02 -- with 1 million rows also satisfactory but it is not is milliseconds
The same query after using order by clause
SQL> select fatwaid from
2 (select /*+ INDEX(fawtaid pk_fatwa) */ fatwaid, rownum x from fatwa
3 where rownum < &UpperBound ORDER BY fatwaid)
4 where x > &LowerBound;
Enter value for upperbound: 100011
old 3: where rownum < &UpperBound ORDER BY fatwaid)
new 3: where rownum < 100011 ORDER BY fatwaid)
Enter value for lowerbound: 100000
old 4: where x > &LowerBound
new 4: where x > 100000
FATWAID
100032
100033
100034
100035
100036
100037
100038
100039
100040
100041
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.06
SQL> /
Enter value for upperbound: 1000011
old 3: where rownum < &UpperBound ORDER BY fatwaid)
new 3: where rownum < 1000011 ORDER BY fatwaid)
Enter value for lowerbound: 1000000
old 4: where x > &LowerBound
new 4: where x > 1000000
FATWAID
1000032
1000033
1000034
1000035
1000036
1000037
1000038
1000039
1000040
1000041
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:07.03 -- slow
SQL> /
Enter value for upperbound: 1000011
old 3: where rownum < &UpperBound ORDER BY fatwaid)
new 3: where rownum < 1000011 ORDER BY fatwaid)
Enter value for lowerbound: 1000000
old 4: where x > &LowerBound
new 4: where x > 1000000
FATWAID
1000032
1000033
1000034
1000035
1000036
1000037
1000038
1000039
1000040
1000041
10 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.06
when I execute the same query again it is bringing records from
the SGA so it is very fast
Now which one to choose from ?
Andrew and Myers queries are good and currently I am using
Myers query.
There should be some technique to do this in the most efficient way.
any input is appreciated.

Can we convert a SQL (Select Statement) to Procedure.?

Hi
I am using a select sql for retrieving the results - Below is a sample sql select query.
select TableC.DATEFIELD as QUERY_DATE,
TableB.COLUMN1 PROCESS,
TableC.COLUMN1 PRODUCT,
sum(TableC.COLUMN4) as OPEN_INSTANCES
from TableA, TableB, TableC
where TableB.COLUMN1 = TableA.COLUMN2
and TableA.COLUMN2 = TableC.COLUMN2
and DATEFIELD <= to_date('2011-02-02' ,'YYYY-MM-DD')
and DATEFIELD >= to_date('2011-02-02' ,'YYYY-MM-DD')
and TableC.COLUMN4 <= (24 * 3600 )
and TableB.COLUMN1 like 'PROCESSID'
and TableC.COLUMN1 in ('OSRCITR')
group by TableC.DATEFIELD as QUERY_DATE,
TableA.COLUMN1 PROCESS,
TableC.COLUMN1 PRODUCT
I believe if we use a Procedure, It would be much faster. Is there any way that we can convert the above select sql to a procedure. If yes, how can it be.
Thanks in Advance.
-Sreekant

Sreekant wrote:
select TableC.DATEFIELD as QUERY_DATE,
TableB.COLUMN1 PROCESS,
TableC.COLUMN1 PRODUCT,
sum(TableC.COLUMN4) as OPEN_INSTANCES
from TableA, TableB, TableC
where TableB.COLUMN1 = TableA.COLUMN2
and TableA.COLUMN2 = TableC.COLUMN2
and DATEFIELD <= to_date('2011-02-02' ,'YYYY-MM-DD')
and DATEFIELD >= to_date('2011-02-02' ,'YYYY-MM-DD')
and TableC.COLUMN4 <= (24 * 3600 )
and TableB.COLUMN1 like 'PROCESSID'
and TableC.COLUMN1 in ('OSRCITR')
group by TableC.DATEFIELD as QUERY_DATE,
TableA.COLUMN1 PROCESS,
TableC.COLUMN1 PRODUCT
I believe if we use a Procedure, It would be much faster. Is there any way that we can convert the above select sql to a procedure. If yes, how can it be.Using the code tags would make the query easier to read :)
What version of Oracle are you on?
Under the right conditions deconstructing a huge query into smaller components sometimes can offer performance increases, but this is more true of older versions of Oracle than recent ones. Lately I get better results from tuning queries in place - as Aman pointed out you introduce context switching (moving between the SQL and PL/SQL engines to do work) which can also hurt performance.
Try tuning the query first. Get an execution plan. Things you can look for include
* make sure the driving table is the best one
* are the join columns properly indexed? Are existing indexes being suppressed due to the functions?
Is "and TableB.COLUMN1 like 'PROCESSID' " correct? without a wildcard LIKE should evalate to =

Querying Data w PL/SQL - selecting 1 row

Initial research done at:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14261/sqloperations.htm#i45320
Querying Data with PL/SQL - Selecting At Most One Row: SELECT INTO Statement
I am trying to run a simple SELECT COUNT statement in PL/SQL. Can someone please help me with the syntax? Here is my SQL select count(*) statement.
SELECT ITEM_TYPE, count(*)
FROM
APPLSYS.WF_ITEMS
WHERE
ITEM_TYPE = 'GLBATCH' AND
END_DATE is not null
GROUP BY ITEM_TYPE;
Thanks, I tried following some examples found on these forum threads but couldn't seem to find one for something so basic as this.

I am trying to run a simple SELECT COUNT statement in PL/SQL. Can someone please help me with the syntax?in plsql you would declare variables to hold the selected values:
declare
   l_item_type   applsys.wf_items.item_type%type;
   l_cnt         integer;
begin
     select   item_type, count ( * )
       into   l_item_type, l_cnt
       from   applsys.wf_items
      where   item_type = 'GLBATCH' and end_date is not null
   group by   item_type;
   dbms_output.put_line ('Item_type: ' || l_item_type);
   dbms_output.put_line ('Count: ' || l_cnt);
end;

Help with record selection/grouping

I am trying to create a report as follows, but am running into some problems with my selection/grouping:
Data Structure (each line is a separate record; each employee has 2 records)
Employee             TaskID      TaskStatus           Marker         Date Modified
1                               A                CLOSED             x
1                               B                OPEN                  N/A
2                               A                CLOSED              y
2                               B                OPEN                 N/A
3                               A                CLOSED             x
3                               B                CLOSED            N/A
4                               A                CLOSED             y
4                               B                CLOSED           N/A
Report Requirements
I want a report that displays only employee number and the date that Task B was completed for all employees, and I want these records grouped based on Task B's Task Status (no problem. I did this).
However, I want to sub-group these Task B records (within Task Status) by the Marker field for Task A records! (I can't figure this out? If I only pull in Task B records, how can I compare what the associated employee has as a marker for their Task A record?)
Again, I only want to display data from the employee's Task B record, while subgrouping on a field value from the empoyee's Task A record. The report would be structured as follows:
Task B (OPEN), with Task A - Marker (x)
                 {Date Modified}
Task B (OPEN), with Task A - Marker (y)
                 {Date Modified}
Task B (CLOSED), with Task A - Marker (x)
                {Date Modified}
Task B (CLOSED), with Task A - Marker (y)
                  {Date Modified}
Thanks.
Gary

The easiest way would be to use an SQL Command that returns both the Task A and Task B data on one record. Something like (MS SQL):
select b.employee, b.taskid as task_b, b.task_status_b, b.marker as marker_b, b.date_modified as date_modified_b,
    a.taskid as task_a, a.task_status_a, a.marker as marker_a, a.date_modified as date_modified_a
from table a, table b
where a.employee = b.employee
and a.taskid = 'A'
and b.taskid = 'B'
HTH,
Carl

SQL to group by n days

i would like know how i can perform grouping based on every n day interval.
for example, i want to group the data based on an n=2day interval
example table:
DATE VALUE
12/12/2005 2:52:00 PM 10
12/12/2005 4:49:00 PM 20
13/12/2005 5:17:00 AM 30
13/12/2005 5:20:00 AM 40
14/12/2005 9:36:00 AM 50
14/12/2005 9:49:00 AM 60
expected result:
STARTDATE ENDDATE SUM(VALUE)
12/12/2005 13/12/2005 100
14/12/2005 15/12/2005 110
but i also want to be able to change the value of n (in days)
Thanks in advance.
Simon

something like...
SQL> def n = 1
SQL> select min(hiredate) start_date, min(hiredate)+&&n end_date, sum(sal) from emp
2 group by hiredate, hiredate+&&n order by 1,2;
old   1: select min(hiredate) start_date, min(hiredate)+&&n end_date, sum(sal) from emp
new   1: select min(hiredate) start_date, min(hiredate)+1 end_date, sum(sal) from emp
old   2: group by hiredate, hiredate+&&n order by 1,2
new   2: group by hiredate, hiredate+1 order by 1,2
START_DATE END_DATE     SUM(SAL)
17/12/1980 18/12/1980        800
20/02/1981 21/02/1981       1600
22/02/1981 23/02/1981       1250
02/04/1981 03/04/1981       2975
01/05/1981 02/05/1981       2850
09/06/1981 10/06/1981       2450
08/09/1981 09/09/1981       1500
28/09/1981 29/09/1981       1250
17/11/1981 18/11/1981       5000
03/12/1981 04/12/1981       3950
23/01/1982 24/01/1982       1300
START_DATE END_DATE     SUM(SAL)
19/04/1987 20/04/1987       3000
23/05/1987 24/05/1987       1100
13 rows selected.where n is the 'day interval'

Help with sql subquery/grouping

Hi... having trouble getting this query to work. Here's the table and data:
create table mytable (
rec_num number,
status_num number,
status_date date
insert into mytable values (1,1,'01-AUG-2006');
insert into mytable values (1,2,'14-AUG-2006');
insert into mytable values (1,8,'01-SEP-2006');
insert into mytable values (1,3,'15-SEP-2006');
insert into mytable values (1,2,'03-SEP-2006');
insert into mytable values (2,2,'17-AUG-2006');
insert into mytable values (3,2,'02-SEP-2006');
insert into mytable values (3,4,'07-SEP-2006');
insert into mytable values (4,1,'18-SEP-2006');
insert into mytable values (4,4,'27-SEP-2006');
insert into mytable values (4,2,'18-SEP-2006');
insert into mytable values (5,1,'01-OCT-2006');
insert into mytable values (5,2,'03-OCT-2006');
insert into mytable values (5,3,'05-OCT-2006');
insert into mytable values (6,1,'01-OCT-2006');
insert into mytable values (7,2,'14-OCT-2006');
insert into mytable values (7,8,'15-OCT-2006');
I'm trying to select the rec_num, status_num, and status_date for the max date for each individual rec_num... it basically tells me the current status of each individual record by getting the status for the most recent date... like the following:
rec_num, status_num, date
1, 3, 15-SEP-2006
2, 2, 17-AUG-2006
3, 4, 07-SEP-2006
etc
This query works... it gets me the max date for each record... but it doesn't give me the status_num:
select rec_num, max(status_date)
from mytable
group by rec_num
Adding status_num messes it up... I know I need some kindof sub-query, but haven't been able to get one to work.
I'd also like a query to get a count on how many records currently exist in each status.
Can someone help me out? Oracle 8i. Thanks!

SQL> select * from my_table;
   REC_NUM STATUS_NUM STATUS_DA
         1          1 01-AUG-06
         1          2 14-AUG-06
         1          8 01-SEP-06
         1          3 15-SEP-06
         1          2 03-SEP-06
         2          2 17-AUG-06
         3          2 02-SEP-06
         3          4 07-SEP-06
         4          1 18-SEP-06
         4          4 27-SEP-06
         4          2 18-SEP-06
         5          1 01-OCT-06
         5          2 03-OCT-06
         5          3 05-OCT-06
         6          1 01-OCT-06
         7          2 14-OCT-06
         7          8 15-OCT-06
SQL> select mt.rec_num,
2         mt.status_num,
3         mt.status_date
4    from (select row_number() over (partition by rec_num order by status_date desc) rn,
5                 rec_num,
6                 status_num,
7                 status_date
8            from my_table) mt
9   where mt.rn = 1;
   REC_NUM STATUS_NUM STATUS_DA
         1          3 15-SEP-06
         2          2 17-AUG-06
         3          4 07-SEP-06
         4          4 27-SEP-06
         5          3 05-OCT-06
         6          1 01-OCT-06
         7          8 15-OCT-06
7 rows selected.
SQL>

Select, grouping and counting...

Hi again, I managed to bypass my trigger problem, so thanks a lot...!
Now, I have a simple question...
Using two tables, Joueur (NoJ (PK), NoE(PK, FK1), NomJ, Adresse, Tel, CoJ)
and Equipe (NoE(PK,FK1), NomE, NoJC(Fk1 of NoJ))
I'll explain the model...
It's a Team table, and a Player Table.
Naturally, the PK on Player (Joueur) is NoE (team number) and NoJ (Player number)
On the Team table, the primary key is NoE (Team number
and the foreign key is NoE AND NoJC which stands for the number of the CAPTAIN player ...
So...
I've got to make a table of 4 cloumns: Team number (NoE), Team name (NomE), Team captain name, number of player in team...
So I need to combine those two tables... on the first table, I got all the info BUT the number of players, which lists all 1 due to the where NoJC = NoJ... but this function is required to get the Captain name...
Select NoE, NomE, NomJ as Capitaine, count(*)
from EQUIPE join JOUEUR using (NoE)
where NoJ=NoJC
group by NoE, NomE, NomJ;
select noe, count(*)
from EQUIPE join JOUEUR using (NoE)
group by noe;Any clue?

I suggest for you :
Put then column noJC in joueur table nojc NUMBER CONSTRAINT fk_no_joueur_cap REFERENCES joueur(noj);
Regards Salim.
SQL> DROP TABLE joueur;
Table supprimée.
SQL> DROP TABLE equipe;
Table supprimée.
SQL> CREATE TABLE equipe (noe NUMBER CONSTRAINT pk_no_eq PRIMARY KEY, nome VARCHAR2(30));
Table créée.
SQL> CREATE TABLE joueur (noj NUMBER CONSTRAINT pk_no_joeur PRIMARY KEY,
2                       noe NUMBER CONSTRAINT fk_no_equipe REFERENCES equipe(noe),
3                       nomj VARCHAR2(30), adresse VARCHAR2(100), tel VARCHAR2(20),
4                       coj VARCHAR2(10), nojc NUMBER CONSTRAINT fk_no_joueur_cap REFERENCES joueu
r(noj) );
Table créée.
SQL> INSERT INTO equipe
2       VALUES (1, 'RC Kouba');
1 ligne créée.
SQL> INSERT INTO joueur
2       VALUES (1, 1, 'Salim', '... Montreal', '514-111-1111', 'NNN', NULL);
1 ligne créée.
SQL> INSERT INTO joueur
2       VALUES (2, 1, 'Richard', '... Montreal', '514-111-2222', 'NNN', 1);
1 ligne créée.
SQL> INSERT INTO joueur
2       VALUES (3, 1, 'Stéphane', '... Montreal', '514-111-3333', 'NNN', 1);
1 ligne créée.
SQL> COMMIT ;
Validation effectuée.
SQL>
SQL> SELECT   equipe.noe, equipe.nome, j.noj nojc, j.nomj capitaine,
2           COUNT (joueur.noj) AS "Nombre de joueurs"
3      FROM joueur, equipe, joueur j
4     WHERE joueur.noe = equipe.noe AND j.noe = equipe.noe AND j.nojc IS NULL
5 GROUP BY equipe.noe, nome, j.noj, j.nomj;
       NOE NOME                                 NOJC CAPITAINE                      Nombre de joueurs
         1 RC Kouba                                1 Salim                                          3
SQL>

Field Selection Group for Batch Management

Hi All,
I do not want to make the field mandatory for Raw Material during creation of material master.
I checked the fileld selection group for MARA-XCHPF for ROH material type, MM01 , it is optional.
But when i try to create the Material Master for ROH it is showing mandatory field.
Amit Shah

Hi,
Go to the OMS9, here enter the Field sel. group 75 for your MARA-XCHPF, enter and then check the ROH Field refrece, if it shows required then select either Optinal entry or Hide or Display as per the requirement.
Check and revert.
Hrishi

Reg: SQL select Query in BPEL process flow


Hi,
I am suppose to execute a SQL select query (in BPEL Process flow) as mention below in JDeveloper using Database adapter.


SELECT LENGTH, WIDTH, HEIGHT, WEIGHT,


LENGTH*WIDTH* HEIGHT AS ITEM_CUBE


FROM CUBE


WHERE ITEM= <xyz>


AND OBJECT= (SELECT CASE_NAME FROM CUBE_SUPPLIER WHERE ITEM=<xyz> AND SUPP_IND = ‘Y')
Now my question is:
1. What does this "*" refer to in the query and how can I retrieve the value of LENGTH*WIDTH* HEIGHT from the query where LENGTH,WIDTH and HEIGHT are the individual field in the table.
2.What does this " AS" refer to? If " ITEM_CUBE " is the alies for the table name "ITEM" to retrieve the value, then query shoud be evaluated as


SELECT LENGTH, WIDTH, HEIGHT, WEIGHT,


LENGTH*WIDTH* HEIGHT AS ITEM_CUBE


FROM CUBE


WHERE ITEM_CUBE.ITEM= <xyz>


AND ITEM_CUBE.OBJECT= (SELECT CASE_NAME FROM CUBE_SUPPLIER WHERE ITEM=<xyz> AND SUPP_IND = ‘Y')
Is my assumption correct?
Please suggest asap.
Thanks...




Hi
Thank for your reply!
I have a nested select query which performs on two different table as shown below:

SELECT LENGTH, WIDTH, HEIGHT, WEIGHT,


LENGTH*WIDTH* HEIGHT AS ITEM_CUBE


FROM CUBE


WHERE ITEM= <abc>


AND OBJECT= (SELECT NAME FROM SUPPLIER WHERE ITEM=<Item> AND SUPP_IND = ‘Y')
I am using DB adapter of Oracle JDeveloper in BPEL process flow, where I can able to select only one master table in DB adapter say SUPPLIER and its attributes at a time.But as per my requirment I need to select both the table (CUBE and SUPPLIER) in a single adapter to execute my query.
It can be achievable by using two DB adapter , One to execute the nested query and another to execute the main qyery considering value of nested query as a parameter.But I want to achieve it by using a single one.
Am I correct with my concept?
Please suggest how to get it ?

Edited by: user10259700 on Oct 23, 2008 12:17 AM

AppleScript to Select Groups of 3 Files?

Hi all,
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. I am trying to create an AppleScript to take groups of 3 files and put them each in their own folder, inside of a master container folder. The files will typically be in DNG format as they will be from my digital camera—3 exposures of the same scene.
Input example: folder containing files IMG_0022.dng, IMG_0023.dng, IMG_0024.dng, IMG_0025.dng, ... IMG_0052.jpg
Output example:
Container folder hdr_images
folder images_group1
IMG_0022.dng
IMG_0023.dng
IMG_0024.dng
folder images_group2
IMG_0025.dng
IMG_0026.dng
IMG_0027.dng
folder images_group10
IMG_0049.dng
IMG_0050.dng
IMG_0051.dng
This is the script I have thus far, but I know there are errors and I can't get it to work the way I want:
-- begin script
tell application "Finder"
          -- Select all files in the folder selected from dialog box
                      set theFiles to files of folder (choose folder)
          -- Prepare to select groups of 3 files (1-3, 4-6, 7-9, etc.)
          set theInterval to 3
          -- Initialize the number of the group of 3 images
                      set groupNumber to 0
          -- Display dialog requesting location to create new folder
          set p to path to desktop
          -- Create new container folder in specified location
                      make new folder at p with properties {name:"seq_groups"}
          -- Loop through groups of 3 files, each time creating a container folder
          -- and copying the 3 files to that container folder
                      repeat with i from 1 to (count theFiles) by theInterval
                                        set groupNumber to groupNumber + 1
                                        set itemsToCopy to null
                                        set itemsToCopy to item i of theFiles
                                        set itemsToCopy to itemsToCopy & item i+1 of theFiles
                                        set itemsToCopy to itemsToCopy & item i+2 of theFiles
                                        copy files itemsToCopy to folder ____
          end repeat
          -- Display message box confirming success
end tell
You can see from the comments that I'd like to have it flow as follows:
User either drags a folder onto the script, selects from the Services menu, or runs the applet to get a dialog box to choose folder
Applet runs on all images within the folder and copies, rather than moves (just in case something goes terribly wrong)
Applet confirms it is finished
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again!

Thanks, I played with it a bit more and this is the final result after more googling:
tell application "Finder"
          set source_folder to (choose folder with prompt "Choose Source Folder")
          set container_folder to (choose folder with prompt "Choose Destination Folder")
          set the_count to 1
sort files in folder source_folder by name
          repeat ((count files in folder source_folder)) div 3 times
make folder at folder container_folder with properties {name:"images_group" & the_count}
                    set the dest_folder to folder ("images_group" & the_count) of container_folder as alias
duplicate files ((the_count * 3) - 2) thru (the_count * 3) of folder source_folder to folder dest_folder
                    set the_count to the_count + 1
          end repeat
end tell
The only problem I continue to have is that it's not going by the "Finder order" of image sequence. Because each group of 3 is a different "scene" I need to make sure that wherever the file numbering sequence starts, it goes in order. Ideally, I'd like for it to read the metadata from the image files (they're all in DNG) and sort by capture time, but that seems a bit outside the scope of AppleScript's capabilities. Thank you again for your help!

SQL selecting group by but....

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for