SQL Server uniqueidentifier cast to binary...what is equivalent in Oracle?

Hi,
I am having trouble understanding equivalent data types in my conversion from SQL Server to Oracle.
Let's say I have this statement in SQL Server, where the string being "passed in" is a uniqueidentifier:
select cast(substring('EFDA8997-63AA-4F33-96CF-29BFC2CE252E',8,1) as binary(1));
The tool I've used to convert this to Oracle says the equivalent statement to this is (where the string being "passed in" is a char:
select cast((substr('EFDA8997-63AA-4F33-96CF-29BFC2CE252E',8,1)) as raw(1)) from dual;
However, I get different results when testing these two statements:
SQL Server: 0x37
Oracle: 07
What is the correct what to convert this statement to Oracle?
Thank you!
Mimi

I should add that this an n-tier application, where data is passed across multiple tiers, so the client UI has no connection to the database.
I'm assuming this means that select..for update is not suitable, as that would require a connection to the database to be held open for a specific user in the middle-tier. Not suitable for a scalable, n-tier scenario.

Similar Messages

SQL Server 2008 Express R2 exceeds the storage capacity of Oracle XE

Hello, here is a novelty: SQL Server 2008 Express R2 exceeds the storage capacity of Oracle XE, XE you still limited to 4GB of data from, the competition gets better and offers a bit more, XE remains the same, hopefully Oracle 11g XE exceeds storage and memory to SQL Server.
[http://www.microsoft.com/express/Database/]
Roberto.
Edited by: rober584812 on Apr 27, 2010 5:09 PM
Edited by: rober584812 on Apr 27, 2010 5:09 PM

Yes, I do good work is correct, I have not thought to migrate from Oracle XE to SQL Server Express because it could not work with the flexibility of PL / SQL and other Oracle features own, however, SQL Server 2008 R2 Express if takes the lead XE in storage, at which Oracle Corp. will match or exceed, offer more storage in response to competition and not only compensate for the limitation of 4GB with Excellency good features.
Roberto.

Need To Create a table in Sql Server and do some culculation into the table from Oracle and Sql

Hello All,
I'm moving a data from Oracle to Sql Server with ETL (80 tables with data) and i want to track the number of records that i moving on the daily basis , so i need to create a table in SQL Server, wilth 4 columns , Table name, OracleRowsCount, SqlRowCount,
and Diff(OracleRowsCount - SqlRowCount) that will tell me the each table how many rows i have in Oracle, how many rows i have in SQL after ETL load, and different between them, something like that:
Table Name OracleRowsCount   SqlRowCount  Diff
Customer                150                 150
0
Sales                      2000                1998
2
Devisions                 5                       5
0
(I can add alot of SQL Tasks and variables per each table but it not seems logicly to do that, i tryid to find a way to deal with that in vb but i didn't find)
What the simplest way to do it ?
Thank you
Best Regards
Daniel

Hi Daniel,
According to your description, what you want is an indicator to show whether all the rows are inserted to the destination table. To achieve your goal, you can add a Row Count Transformation following the OLE DB Destination, and redirect bad rows to the Row
Count Transformation. This way, we can get the count of the bad rows without redirecting these rows. Since the row count value is stored in a variable, we can create another string type variable to retrieve the row count value from the variable used by the
Row Count Transformation, and then use a Send Mail Task to send the row count value in an email message body. You can also insert the row count value to the SQL Server table through Execute SQL Task. Then, you can check whether bad rows were generated in the
package by querying this table.
Regards,
Mike Yin
TechNet Community Support

SQL Server synonym used in two ways, local table and Oracle table via ODBC, fails on ODBC

I am implementing a Web Site at our institution that was written for another institution that was all SQL Server.The Web Site has included as a feature the use of synonyms which have a dual use. Normally they point to a different machine, different database (PeopleSoft)
via linked server, but if the linked server connection fails they can be switched to point to tables on the local instance by running a stored procedure that redefines the synonyms. This is a failover feature meant to keep the site up by resorting to
possibly out of date data if need be.
This means that any SQL Select statement that uses one of these synonyms is unaware of whether the data returned comes from the local instance or from another remote instance. There is no logic to check whether the linked server is functioning or not.
The local instance is a custom SQL Server database at both institutions. The remote instance is one of two PeopleSoft instances at both shops; however, while the original website was written to work with the remote instance being SQL Server,
our shop uses Oracle for PeopleSoft. This means that our linked servers are further complicated by an ODBC connection that the original site did not need.
The problem I have is that the SQL statements in the stored procedures that came with the Web Site do not work when a synonym is used that points to the remote PeopleSoft instance. The same statements also fail in SSMS. I get this error when I run
this statement (select * from PS_ZZ_BUD_JOB_VW):
Error: The OLE DB provider "OraOLEDB.Oracle" for linked server "CSUPG" does not contain the table
""dbo"."PS_ZZ_BUD_JOB_VW"". The table either does not exist or the current user does not have permissions on that table.
I can successfully query the PeopleSoft database using openquery, but unless I can get the synonyms to work as they were intended to, I'll have to rewrite all the stored procedures that use them to: 1) check if the linked servers are up, then 2) execute
one of two versions of each SQL statement depending on the result of that check.

Will the four-part notation work when the synonym is pointing to the local SQL Server table ?
You should not use four-part notation when you reference your synonym. The four-part query that I suggested is only one you would to determine to define our synonym correctly when the view is on the Oracle server.
In the case of synonym PS_ZZ_BUD_JOB_VW, it can point to either an Oracle view of the same name, or to a local SQL Server table named PS_HR_JOB.
Then the table is local the synonuym definition should be
CREATE SYNONYM PS_ZZ_BUD_JOB_VW FOR dbo.PS_HR_JOB
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

MS SQL Server system stored procedures can't be migrated into Oracle 11g

During database migration from MS SQL Server 2008 to Oracle 11g R2, if the application stored procedure invokes the MS SQL Server system stored procedures (for example: sp_getapplock, sp_releaseapplock ....), these SQL server system stored procedures can't be transferred. See following migrated Oracle application stored procedure for example:
create or replace
PROCEDURE spPwSysID_GetNextID
v_ID OUT NUMBER,
iv_SysType IN NVARCHAR2 DEFAULT NULL ,
iv_Cnt IN NUMBER DEFAULT NULL
AS
v_SysType NVARCHAR2(50) := iv_SysType;
v_Cnt NUMBER(10,0) := iv_Cnt;
v_result NUMBER(10,0);
BEGIN
--SQL Server BEGIN TRANSACTION;
utils.incrementTrancount;
v_Systype := UPPER(v_Systype) ;
IF v_Cnt < 1 THEN
v_Cnt := 1 ;
END IF;
v_result :=sp_getapplock(v_Resource => v_Systype,
v_LockMode => 'Exclusive') ;
IF v_result >= 0 THEN
BEGIN
SELECT ID
INTO v_ID
FROM PWSYSID
WHERE SysType = v_SysType;
IF SQL%ROWCOUNT = 1 THEN
UPDATE PwSysID
SET ID = ID + v_cnt
WHERE SysType = v_SysType;
ELSE
BEGIN
INSERT INTO PwSysID
( ID, SysType )
VALUES ( v_cnt + 1, v_SysType );
v_ID := 1 ;
END;
END IF;
v_result :=sp_releaseapplock(v_Resource => v_Systype) ;
END;
ELSE
BEGIN
raise_application_error( -20002, 'Lock failed to acquire to generate Cityworks Id.' );
END;
END IF;
utils.commit_transaction;
END;

During database migration from MS SQL Server 2008 to Oracle 11g R2, if the application stored procedure invokes the MS SQL Server system stored procedures (for example: sp_getapplock, sp_releaseapplock ....), these SQL server system stored procedures can't be transferred. See following migrated Oracle application stored procedure for example:
create or replace
PROCEDURE spPwSysID_GetNextID
v_ID OUT NUMBER,
iv_SysType IN NVARCHAR2 DEFAULT NULL ,
iv_Cnt IN NUMBER DEFAULT NULL
AS
v_SysType NVARCHAR2(50) := iv_SysType;
v_Cnt NUMBER(10,0) := iv_Cnt;
v_result NUMBER(10,0);
BEGIN
--SQL Server BEGIN TRANSACTION;
utils.incrementTrancount;
v_Systype := UPPER(v_Systype) ;
IF v_Cnt < 1 THEN
v_Cnt := 1 ;
END IF;
v_result :=sp_getapplock(v_Resource => v_Systype,
v_LockMode => 'Exclusive') ;
IF v_result >= 0 THEN
BEGIN
SELECT ID
INTO v_ID
FROM PWSYSID
WHERE SysType = v_SysType;
IF SQL%ROWCOUNT = 1 THEN
UPDATE PwSysID
SET ID = ID + v_cnt
WHERE SysType = v_SysType;
ELSE
BEGIN
INSERT INTO PwSysID
( ID, SysType )
VALUES ( v_cnt + 1, v_SysType );
v_ID := 1 ;
END;
END IF;
v_result :=sp_releaseapplock(v_Resource => v_Systype) ;
END;
ELSE
BEGIN
raise_application_error( -20002, 'Lock failed to acquire to generate Cityworks Id.' );
END;
END IF;
utils.commit_transaction;
END;

Connecting sql server database as source system into BW in unix/oracle

Hi
We have a requirement to extract the data from MS SQL server database as a source system into the BW3.0B instance, which is running under HP-UX/oracle.
We have been told that Microsoft does not supply a SQL Server driver for UNIX.
So in this case, we need to have a option to complete it.
Please let me know if some one has any similar type configuration existing.
VJ

In general, BI application servers can only be supported for DB Connect on operating system versions where a SAP Database Shared Library (DBSL) has been released for the BI database and the source database.
refer: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/58/54f9c1562d104c9465dabd816f3f24/frameset.htm for DB Connect supported DB's.

SQL Server express R2 10GB database limit vs 4 GB Oracle XE

Hi,
New version of sqlserver express now limits the database to 10GB of data from 4GB, what about oracle XE ???
what do you think ??
Regards

I teach database concepts and use XE a lot and sometimes SQLServer Express and both are good options for students, new users and small business, by now MS has upgraded 3 times (2005, 2008 and 2008 r2) and oracle zero ......
I don't see me recommending MySQL over XE even oracle owns both, but if the case could be SQLserver Express R2 over XE.
Wish oracle put more effort on that database that is the entry point and the way to attract a lot of fans
regards

Decimal of SQL Server getting converted to Whole number in ORACLE

Hi All,
I am using ORACLESQL Developer tool to migrate database from SQL Server to ORACLE. The decimal datatype in Sql Server is not getting converted to its equivalent in ORACLE. Do anyone face the same problem? Its getting converted to WHOLE number.
Also I am able to import data only from Excel sheet. Is therre any other option to import data using this tool?
Also is the tool the best to use for migration? Please give me your suggestions pls since I am facing this conversion problem after import lakhs of data.
I am using version 1.1.3
Thanks in Advance,
Srinivasan.T

I have upgraded to the version mentioned by you. Even now it is not getting upgraded. I am exporting data using Excel sheet only. Is it possible for you to explain how to migrate data thru SQL * PLUS?
Thanks,
Srinivasan.T

What's the requirments to connect SQL server ?

Hi everybody
We are the bignners need help here we need the details about how to setup every single point to start programming with J2EE
1- What I should install on my computer ?
for examples I have NetBeans IDE I want connect it with SQL server or MS access so what's the software I need and
- what's the JDBC ?
alot of question any way we need your help this answer will help all beginners now and in the futuer.
thanks
Message was edited by:
programmer.alyaseen

what is the requirement to connecty sql server with Netbeans IDE 5.5
and what is the procedure

Equivalent of Materialized Views in SQL Server

Hi
we are migrating Oracle Database to SQL Server 2012 and is looking for solution, equivalent to Materialized Views in Oracle.
we had tried to implement indexed View, but that was not possible, because the MVs have outer joins, subqueries, aggregate functions and also there is no column in it which can act as a Primary Key.
Please Help to get a solution for this issue.
Regards
Joyasree Mondal

>use tempdb
>drop table t
>go
>create table t(id int, constraint pk_t primary key (id))
>
>go
>insert into t(id)
>select top 1000 cast( cast( newid() as binary(4) ) as int)
>from sys.objects o, sys.columns c
>go 100
>
>
>select id
>from t with (index=pk_t, tablockx)
>
>
>select id
>from t with (index=pk_t, nolock)
Still the same order.
>> No, its always in the key order like I've shown here.
> You are extrapolating from a single example.
Actually, this information doesn't even come from my exampleS (there were quite a few so far). Its written in the article you posted here. My examples are meant to confirm that and explain why the ORDER BY clause is redundant in some cases.
> I have. ORDER BY in a view used to always return ordered results. Then it didn't.
Examples? References?
>GROUP BY without an ORDER BY used to always return ordered results. Then it didn't. Many queries have >change the result ordering when you get a parallel plan.
Now you finally admit ordered results would always be returned, even without an order by clause. We are in the right track it appears. The reason for this change of behavior is a variation in the logical operator used by the query optimizer, and not the
way the engine reads pages from disk.
In the beginning of times there was stream aggregate, an operator that would require its input to be sorted. And this is how a GROUP BY clause would ensure results were always ordered.
But then his ugly cousin came and messed things up. He doesnt need an ordered input so yeah, order would be random. AGAIN, there are still ways of enforcing order here, through query hints, without requiring an order by clause, so this changes nothing.
You have confirmed that for a given operator, results will always be ordered. Your own argument has, once again, proven my point.
> Right. But there are different _kinds_ of scans. An ordered scan, where SQL Server reads rows based on the logical order of the index is just one kind.
It only won't scan in key order (by scheduling reads) if you change the transaction isolation level and hope for the worse. Because the key order scan is the best performing way of reading pages, this behavior (although possible) wasan't even observed in
the example with NOLOCK/TABLOCK (known to cause allocation-order scans in larger tables) you posted above.
> Other kinds include the parallel scan, the reverse scan,
References?
> the merry-go-round scan,
Only applies to table scans, not indexes.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms191475%28v=SQL.105%29.aspx
> And the allocation-order (or unordered) scan.
Only if you specify TABLOCK or NOLOCK query hints, which I haven't done. This is something that goes without saying, it's irrelevant to an indexed view scenario such as this one.
Some people have also said it will perform an allocation-order scan if the index is too fragmented in SQL Server 2005, but as of 2012 it (probably) won't, as I have shown here. There is also no document anywhere in the internet (you are free to search for
it), that would point us otherwise. If you have access to additional information, I would be more than happy if you could share it with us.
Reference: http://sqlmag.com/database-development/quaere-verum-clustered-index-scans-part-iii
> And don't take my word for it. Take Conor Cunningham's:
>If you need order in your query results, put in an ORDER BY. It's that simple. Anything else is like >riding in a car without a seatbelt.
>No Seatbelt - Expecting Order without ORDER BY
Again, with all due respect, did you read your own article? Did you read what I said earlier about having multiple I/O threads as a whole other situation? If you add new variables, OF COURSE the results will be different. Parallelism was disabled in the
server I performed these tests on, but still you can control this by query hints, and you can enforce execution plans by using plan gudes.
Its like I always say - it's always about the 0.001% of situations, the exceptions, rather than the general rule.
Tell Mr Connor to add MAXDOP 1 to his querys OPTION clause and see if results are still unordered lol
References:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190417.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181714.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188611%28v=sql.105%29.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2008/08/27/no-seatbelt-expecting-order-without-order-by.aspx
Imagining uncontrollable factors that would get an ordered input to be retrieved in an unordered manner is one of SQL Server's myths. There are a whole other people around who think the same way because of some experiences they had when they didn't know
how to control the execution plan, and adding an order by clause is a very popular and easy shortcut to a complex problem. "In the worst cases it will just be redundant", they say. What they like to forget is that sorting has an often high cost,
and it can be avoided by taking advantage of indexes.

SQL Server 2008 R2 Std with SQL Server 2005 Express Subscriptions

If we have SQL Server 2005 Express Merge Replication Subscriptions that synch to a SQL Server 2008 R2 Standard Edition. Do
the Subscriptions still have same file size limitations even though they synch to a Proper Standard Version of SQL Server 2008?
If so what are these limitations?
What happens in the instance where by the server file becomes huge then the Subscriptions will not allow the data to replicate
as the Express Subscription engine has a file size limitation - or does this not matter??

You will get messages on your SQL Server Express servers that the merge agent cannot write to the SQL Express database. These messages are difficult to debug as you don't get a warning you have exceeded the size limit on the subscriber.
looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Administration?
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Server-2008-Management-Administration/dp/067233044X looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Full-Text Search?
http://www.amazon.com/Pro-Full-Text-Search-Server-2008/dp/1430215941

How can I get an accurate count of computers (workstations) logged in to my SQL Server database?

We license our software by number of workstations.
I have a query that I have used for years to get an accurate count of the workstations logged in to my SQL Server database. For simplicity, all users use the same login name/password. This is built in to the script that attaches to the DB. They
have access only to that DB with the exception of
USE [Master] GRANT VIEW SERVER STATE to MyUser
The query that has been working is below:
Basically this relies on the mac address (Master.dbo.sysprocesses.net_addre
SELECT COUNT(Users) AS UserCount FROM (SELECT COUNT(Master.dbo.sysprocesses.hostname) AS Users FROM Master.dbo.sysprocesses LEFT OUTER JOIN Master.dbo.sysdatabases ON Master.dbo.sysdatabases.dbid = Master.dbo.sysprocesses.dbid WHERE (Master.dbo.sysdatabases.name = 'MyDatabase') GROUP BY Master.dbo.sysprocesses.net_address) AS UserCount_1
ss), since both Workstation names and ip addresses can be duplicated.
Recently this has stopped working at a number of customers. Suddenly individual workstations are showing multiple net addresses for the same workstation causing a substantial overcount of users. This may be related to SQL Server 2012 - not sure.
What I need is a very reliable way to get a count of workstations logged in to my database.
If anyone can tell me why I am suddenly getting multiple net_addresses for each workstation and how to prevent that that would be one possible solution.
Otherwise if anyone can give me a rock solid way to get a workstation count other than the above that would be great. Our largest customer is 50 users by the way.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Kim

I think your count is getting skewed because of duplicate rows in sysprocesses because of parallelism. Add DISTINCT to your query:
SELECT COUNT(Users) AS UserCount
FROM
( SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT Master.dbo.sysprocesses.hostname) AS Users
FROM Master.dbo.sysprocesses LEFT OUTER JOIN Master.dbo.sysdatabases
ON Master.dbo.sysdatabases.dbid = Master.dbo.sysprocesses.dbid
WHERE (Master.dbo.sysdatabases.name = 'MyDatabase'
GROUP BY Master.dbo.sysprocesses.net_address) AS UserCount_1
Satish Kartan www.sqlfood.com

SQL Server 2012 DB Engine does not start (clean install with server 2012 and 2008 R2)

I'm trying to do clean installation of SQL server 2012 on Server 2012 (which is runnning as a VM on ESX server) and getting this "wait on the DB engine recovery failed" message. Initially, I though this issue was related to some permission issues
but changing the permission or service accounts didn't help. I'm not seeing any "denied" messages in the log files either. Even with Server 2008 R2 (clean built VM), the installation gives the exactly the same error messages.
My setup is purely for test purpose; so, the security is not a concern. Can someone help or give me a clue where to look?
(Summary)
Overall summary:
Final result: Failed: see details below
Exit code (Decimal): -2061893606
Start time: 2014-05-28 17:12:12
End time: 2014-05-28 17:19:47
Requested action: Install
Setup completed with required actions for features.
Troubleshooting information for those features:
Next step for SQLEngine: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Machine Properties:
Machine name: WIN-1V3VKPV5Q19
Machine processor count: 1
OS version: Future Windows Version
OS service pack:
OS region: United States
OS language: English (United States)
OS architecture: x64
Process architecture: 64 Bit
OS clustered: No
Product features discovered:
Product Instance Instance ID Feature
Language Edition Version Clustered
Package properties:
Description: Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Service Pack 1
ProductName: SQL Server 2012
Type: RTM
Version: 11
Installation location: E:\x64\setup\
Installation edition: Evaluation
Slipstream: True
SP Level 1
Patch Level: 11.1.3128.0
Product Update Status:
Success: KB 2674319, KB 2793634
Product Updates Selected for Installation:
Title: Service Pack 1
Knowledge Based Article: KB 2674319
Version: 11.1.3000.0
Architecture: x64
Language: 1033
Title: SQL Server 2012 SP1 GDR Product Update
Knowledge Based Article: KB 2793634
Version: 11.1.3128.0
Architecture: x64
Language: All
Update Source: MU
User Input Settings:
ACTION: Install
ADDCURRENTUSERASSQLADMIN: false
AGTSVCACCOUNT: NT Service\SQLAgent$TESTDB
AGTSVCPASSWORD: *****
AGTSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Manual
ASBACKUPDIR: Backup
ASCOLLATION: Latin1_General_CI_AS
ASCONFIGDIR: Config
ASDATADIR: Data
ASLOGDIR: Log
ASPROVIDERMSOLAP: 1
ASSERVERMODE: MULTIDIMENSIONAL
ASSVCACCOUNT: <empty>
ASSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
ASSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Automatic
ASSYSADMINACCOUNTS: <empty>
ASTEMPDIR: Temp
BROWSERSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Automatic
CLTCTLRNAME: <empty>
CLTRESULTDIR: <empty>
CLTSTARTUPTYPE: 0
CLTSVCACCOUNT: <empty>
CLTSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
CLTWORKINGDIR: <empty>
COMMFABRICENCRYPTION: 0
COMMFABRICNETWORKLEVEL: 0
COMMFABRICPORT: 0
CONFIGURATIONFILE: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20140528_170909\ConfigurationFile.ini
CTLRSTARTUPTYPE: 0
CTLRSVCACCOUNT: <empty>
CTLRSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
CTLRUSERS: <empty>
ENABLERANU: false
ENU: true
ERRORREPORTING: false
FEATURES: SQLENGINE
FILESTREAMLEVEL: 0
FILESTREAMSHARENAME: <empty>
FTSVCACCOUNT: <empty>
FTSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
HELP: false
IACCEPTSQLSERVERLICENSETERMS: true
INDICATEPROGRESS: false
INSTALLSHAREDDIR: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\
INSTALLSHAREDWOWDIR: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\
INSTALLSQLDATADIR: <empty>
INSTANCEDIR: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\
INSTANCEID: TESTDB
INSTANCENAME: TESTDB
ISSVCACCOUNT: NT AUTHORITY\Network Service
ISSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
ISSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Automatic
MATRIXCMBRICKCOMMPORT: 0
MATRIXCMSERVERNAME: <empty>
MATRIXNAME: <empty>
NPENABLED: 0
PID: *****
QUIET: false
QUIETSIMPLE: false
ROLE: <empty>
RSINSTALLMODE: DefaultNativeMode
RSSHPINSTALLMODE: DefaultSharePointMode
RSSVCACCOUNT: <empty>
RSSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
RSSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Automatic
SAPWD: *****
SECURITYMODE: SQL
SQLBACKUPDIR: <empty>
SQLCOLLATION: SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
SQLSVCACCOUNT: NT Service\MSSQL$TESTDB
SQLSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
SQLSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Automatic
SQLSYSADMINACCOUNTS: WIN-1V3VKPV5Q19\Administrator
SQLTEMPDBDIR: <empty>
SQLTEMPDBLOGDIR: <empty>
SQLUSERDBDIR: <empty>
SQLUSERDBLOGDIR: <empty>
SQMREPORTING: false
TCPENABLED: 1
UIMODE: Normal
UpdateEnabled: true
UpdateSource: MU
X86: false
Configuration file: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20140528_170909\ConfigurationFile.ini
Detailed results:
Feature: Database Engine Services
Status: Failed: see logs for details
Reason for failure: An error occurred during the setup process of the feature.
Next Step: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Component name: SQL Server Database Engine Services Instance Features
Component error code: 0x851A001A
Error description: Wait on the Database Engine recovery handle failed. Check the SQL Server error log for potential causes.
Error help link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkId=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=50000&ProdVer=11.0.3128.0&EvtType=0xD15B4EB2%400x4BDAF9BA%401306%4026&EvtType=0xD15B4EB2%400x4BDAF9BA%401306%4026
Feature: SQL Browser
Status: Passed
Feature: SQL Writer
Status: Passed
Feature: SQL Client Connectivity
Status: Passed
Feature: SQL Client Connectivity SDK
Status: Passed
Rules with failures:
Global rules:
Scenario specific rules:
Rules report file: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20140528_170909\SystemConfigurationCheck_Report.htm
(Error Log)
2014-05-28 17:17:26.64 spid8s 0 transactions rolled back in database 'msdb' (4:0). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2014-05-28 17:17:26.73 spid9s Starting up database 'model'.
2014-05-28 17:17:28.24 spid9s Error: 9004, Severity: 23, State: 6.
2014-05-28 17:17:28.24 spid9s An error occurred while processing the log for database 'model'. If possible, restore from backup. If a backup is not available, it might be necessary to rebuild the log.
2014-05-28 17:17:28.24 spid9s SQL Trace was stopped due to server shutdown. Trace ID = '1'. This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
(Details)
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Exception type: Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SqlEngine.SqlEngineConfigException
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Message:
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Wait on the Database Engine recovery handle failed. Check the SQL Server error log for potential causes.
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: HResult : 0x851a001a
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: FacilityCode : 1306 (51a)
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: ErrorCode : 26 (001a)
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Data:
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: SQL.Setup.FailureCategory = ConfigurationFailure
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: WatsonConfigActionData = INSTALL@CONFIGRC@SQL_ENGINE_CORE_INST
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: WatsonExceptionFeatureIdsActionData = System.String[]
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Stack:
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: at Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SqlEngine.SqlServerServiceBase.WaitSqlServerStart(Process processSql)
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: at Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SqlEngine.SqlServerServiceSCM.StartSqlServer(String[] parameters)
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: at Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SqlEngine.SqlEngineDBStartConfig.ConfigSQLServerSystemDatabases(EffectiveProperties properties, Boolean isConfiguringTemplateDBs, Boolean useInstallInputs)
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: at Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SqlEngine.SqlEngineDBStartConfig.DoCommonDBStartConfig(ConfigActionTiming timing)
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: at Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SqlConfigBase.SlpConfigAction.ExecuteAction(String actionId)
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: at Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SqlConfigBase.SlpConfigAction.Execute(String actionId, TextWriter errorStream)
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Watson Bucket 1
Original Parameter Values
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 0 : SQL Server 2012@RTM@
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 1 : Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SqlEngine.SqlServerServiceBase.WaitSqlServerStart
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 2 : Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SqlEngine.SqlServerServiceBase.WaitSqlServerStart
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 3 : Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SqlEngine.SqlEngineConfigException@1306@26
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 4 : Microsoft.SqlServer.Configuration.SqlEngine.SqlEngineConfigException@1306@26
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 5 : SqlEngineDBStartConfigAction_install_configrc
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 6 : INSTALL@CONFIGRC@SQL_ENGINE_CORE_INST
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp:
Final Parameter Values
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 0 : SQL Server 2012@RTM@
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 1 : 0xD15B4EB2
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 2 : 0xD15B4EB2
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 3 : 0x4BDAF9BA@1306@26
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 4 : 0x4BDAF9BA@1306@26
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 5 : SqlEngineDBStartConfigAction_install_configrc
(01) 2014-05-28 17:17:28 Slp: Parameter 6 : 0x9C5770A6

Hi Nababoya:
As you are telling this is a test installation process...
In the logs i m seeing the error message "An error occurred while processing the log for database 'model'. If possible, restore from backup. If a backup is not available, it might be necessary to rebuild the log.".
1) If the SQL Services was installed successfully and SQL Service was not able to start because of model database issue...
    1.1) If you have model database SQL back file, start the SQL Server in single user mode with minimum configuration and try to restore MODEL database
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlserverfaq/archive/2011/05/11/inf-hey-my-sql-server-service-is-not-starting-what-do-i-do.aspx
    1.2) If you don't have backups., try to rebuild the system databases but make sure that you are not losing any data critical data on master and SQL Jobs on MSDB
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd207003%28v=sql.110%29.aspx#RebuildProcedure
2) As if this is a new installation try to repair the instance with the help of setup media file
3) If the repair option fails., the last option wipe out the complete SQL Server components from Services.msc and Registries and start new installation.
4) Make sure when you are doing un-installation all the required SQL Server components on services.msc should be in stop state.
Hope this helps and let me know any questions...
Thanks,
Thanks, Satish Kumar. Please mark as this post as answered if my anser helps you to resolves your issue :)

SQL Server 2005 data pull from Oracle

Hi, I am learning how to use Oracle and I ran into this problem.
My database is running on SQL Server 2005.
I have an ODBC connection to Oracle. I also have a VB .Net script that queries the Oracle table that the data resides in.
When the job is running, and if it stalls, I do not get a timeout error. It locks down my database and no other source systems can feed data to me; these are back logged in the queue.
Is there an easier way for me to make a connection that will pull data on a consistent basis? Please help ...
Student Learner

Learning how to use Oracle does not include taking data from Oracle and putting it into SQL Server.
From your description of what is happening I agree with BluShadow. This is not an Oracle issue. This is a coding in VB .NET issue.
Posting the statements you are executing against some unknown version of Oracle would be a good starting point.

Linked Server unable to Connect in SQL Server 2012 after Restarting SQL Server Service it works fine. Why?

I have created a Linked Server to Access Database of 64 MB in Size located in Remote System to SQL Server 2012.In Start for Some time it works fine and after it is giving the Error
OLE DB provider "Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0" for linked server "LANDLINE_TEST" returned message "Cannot open a database created with a previous version of your application.".
Msg 7303, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Insert_Records_Into_Actual_Calls_History, Line 29
Cannot initialize the data source object of OLE DB provider "Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0" for linked server "LANDLINE_TEST".
Previously I thought it as Permission Issue. By trying some fixes proposed in forums it not fixed. But, after restarting the SQL Server Services without changes to the linked Server it works perfectly. How could i fix it. I don't want restart the SQL Server
Service it leads to Some other process failures.
RehaanKhan. M

After all the Errors, When I am restarting the SQL Server its working correctly.
Whats the problem it is clearing itself after restarting of SQL Server. Why ?. I can't find anything regarding this in SQL Server .
The following are the Errors i got connecting to SQl Server.
OLE DB provider "Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0" for linked server "LANDLINE_TEST" returned message "Cannot open a database created with a previous version of your application.".
Msg 7303, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Insert_Records_Into_Actual_Calls_History, Line 29
Cannot initialize the data source object of OLE DB provider "Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0" for linked server "LANDLINE_TEST".
Error-2:
Executed as user: RMS\Administrator. Cannot initialize the data source object of OLE DB provider "Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0" for linked server "LANDLINE_TEST". [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 7303) OLE DB provider
"Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0" for linked server "LANDLINE_TEST" returned message "Cannot open a database created with a previous version of your application.". [SQLSTATE 01000] (Error 7412). The step failed.
After unchecking the Allow In Process in OLEDB.ACE Provider Properties.
Msg 7399, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Insert_Records_Into_Actual_Calls_History, Line 29
The OLE DB provider "Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0" for linked server "LANDLINE_TEST" reported an error. Access denied.
Msg 7301, Level 16, State 2, Procedure Insert_Records_Into_Actual_Calls_History, Line 29
Cannot obtain the required interface ("IID_IDBCreateCommand") from OLE DB provider "Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0" for linked server "LANDLINE_TEST".
for to fix above error i have followed the instructions in the following link,
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dataaccesstechnologies/archive/2010/08/19/permissions-needed-to-set-up-linked-server-with-out-of-process-provider.aspx
This also failed to work. I Restarted SQL Server and make the Linked Server Properties Default to my Configuration and it works fine.
Can you suggest me a solution for this issue. Every time i don't want to restart SQL Server Services as it effects other jobs and Processes.
Thank you.
RehaanKhan. M

SQL Server uniqueidentifier cast to binary...what is equivalent in Oracle?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for