SSO regapp registration with multiple net names

Hello!
I succesfully configured my apex engine to work with SSO authentication.
I used in regapp.sql
l_listener_token := 'HTML_DB:myhostname.mydomanin.com:7777';
and now the home page link works fine:
http://myhostname.mydomanin.com:7777/pls/htmldb/f?p=504:1
The problem is that I have some other network names (aliases) for the same IP (10.10.10.10) and I want these links to be functional as well:
http://myhostname2.mydomanin2.com:7777/pls/htmldb/f?p=504:1
http://10.10.10.10:7777/pls/htmldb/f?p=504:1
But when using them I get this error:
Error in portal_sso_redirect: missing application registration information:
p_partner_app_name:g_listener_token:HTML_DB:myhostname2.mydomanin2.com:7777
Please register this application as described in the installation guide
I tried to reuse the tokens I have for myhostname.mydomanin.com and register again regapp.sql with:
l_listener_token := 'HTML_DB:myhostname2.mydomanin2.com:7777';
But this violates unique constraint WWSEC_SECI_UK1 on WWSEC_ENABLER_CONFIG_INFO$.SITE_TOKEN column.
Question:
Is there a way to make functional the alternate links without getting new tokens (new SSO registrations to iAS)?
Thanks,
Sorin

Try this
Replace the < and > with their corresponding HTML escape characters , &lt an &gt (The escape characters need a trailing ; )
Under Column Formatting for this column
<a hre="mailto:#IDS#">#IDS#</a> varad

Similar Messages

Problem with multiple skeakers name.....

Hi,
I have 3 airport express in the house, I just renamed some of them using the Airport admin utility app. Now for some reason itune still shows the old names in the multiple speakers menu.
Try to quit all apps even restart and check permissions no luck so far.....
When I go to Airport admin the scan reveals the stations with their new names.
Any idea how I get itune to get the new names?
thanks

mmm I will try to explain it better:
1) long time ago I created my account SDN, in "kind of relationship with SAP option", I indicated "partner" (i work for consulting company, SAP partner), and register in the form our S000... number.
2) From there, I login SDN with my personal mail, and in my profile my data OK and like SAP partner.
3) from a few months ago, when I try to login using my ma.il as usual, I get an error message:
The email address does not exist. and that I must enter you user S000 ....
4) but when I login user our S000.. (such as SAP partner), "Ariela" data appears (who is my boss), because she is the comercial contact person with SAP, and she manage the S000 account
5) the history, posts, points and others are mine (Leandro Balboni);
6) but I do not want is to change this profile, because in this way would be modifying the data responsible for the SAP account as a partner.
7) I wonder if I can still loing SDN as before, perhaps must not indicate "partner", but simply put the name of my company.
8) how can I fix it?
thanks in advance,
best regards,
Leandro
Edited by: Ariela Mara Fefer on Aug 25, 2009 1:03 PM

How to confiture virtual hosts with multiple domain names

hello,
I've read through some of the postings here on virtual hosts, but I thought I'd better solicit advice before I actually try some of the things I've read about.
In a nutshell, I've purchased multiple domain names that I'd like to alias to a new site (currently it is just a subfolder in the main site directory) on my OS 10.3.x server. There is only the one main site configured right now on the box, so I know I need to set up a second "virtual site" pointing to the files in this subfolder to make it function as its own site.
I've dabbled around with the sites settings in the GUI, but I'd probably be most comfortable setting all this up in the httpd.conf by hand if I could. But I'm weary of this because I know it might be better to use the GUI because of OS X Server's flavor of WebObjects and Apache (sigh).
So, I have two main questions:
1) How would I set up this second site using the GUI in server settings? Do I need to first move the subfolder out of the main folder before it can be designated its own site? Or can I just point to it in the GUI? Can I use one of my purchased domain names in the domain field?
2) Currently, I have URL Forwarding set with my multiple domain names, but I'm thinking there might be a better way to do this? For SEO I'd rather use some type of redirect rather than being penalized by search engines for having what looks to be multiple domains pointing to the same site.I'm thinking I should create virtual sites for each domain name I've purchased with a hard redirect back to the main site?
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks
G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9) 10.3.9 Server
G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9) 10.3.9 Server

thank you for your reply.
> You can create each site as a new Site in Server
Admin. When you do this you can choose any
directory on disk as the document root for each
site.This means you can move the sites' folders out of
/Library/WebServer/Documents if you like - you could
create /Library/WebServer/site1,
/Library/WebServer/site2, etc. (or even be outside of
/Library/WebServer if you want).
so, are you are saying that I could designate one site to be
/Library/WebServer/Documents/site1
and another to be
/Library/WebServer/Documents/site1/directory1
even though directory1 is contained within site1's structure? I'm not advancing this as a good idea, necessarily. I'm just wondering if Apache would complain.
> Each site should have the domain name set as per your
registered domains. Apache will need this to
determine the correct site to serve for each
request.
Well, after some additional research I'm thinking I'm missing a critical piece of the puzzle. That being access to the DNS host server that manages the context of my server. I have purchased domain names through an outside registrar that point to my site and I can create virtual hosts on my server, but I don't have the ability to add the new virtual host names into the DNS server that manages my box. If that makes sense. Or maybe I'm missing something?
>
I'm not sure why you're using URL forwarding at all.
Without that piece of information it's impossible to
tell you whether you should continue using them or
not - in general there's no need to use URL
forwarding if you have multiple Virtual Hosts setup,
but it sounds like you have multiple hostnames
pointing to the same content, so your needs may be
different.
I'm using forwarding for the reason I list above. I didn't purchase hosting with the registrar where I purchased my domain names, so they are parked on the registrar's name server with URL forwarding to my server. The DNS server that manages my box resides in a different location and I don't have the ability to add DNS entries pointing to virtual hosts that I want to set up. Am I stuck?
G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9) 10.3.9 Server

Creating CSR with multiple common names in a single CSR

Hello Gurus,
We are configuring SSL for which we were in the process of generating CSR from Oracle HTTP server. But we want to use multiple URL's for a server. For example
domain.example.com will be our primary URL and domain2.example.com would be our secondary URL.
Following are the questions/doubts that I have -
1. Can we mention multiple Common Name [CN] in the single CSR.
2. IF we mention our primary URL in the Common Name field , while generating the certificate can we mention secondary URL in the Subject Alternative Field[SAN]?
3. If we can mention the secondary URL in SAN, will it create Certificate import error while we import the generated certificate in OHS.Any help will be highly appreciated and if that really helps will be marked as helpful/correct.
Thanks
Saurabh

Hello,
If you are certain then what does this line mean
Please note that in FMW 11g. regardless of how the Wallet is created or the Wallet type used, use of Wildcard Certificates e.g ".domain" are not supported as Oracle deems them insecure.*
This line is from My Oracle Support *Understanding Wallets and Keystores in Fusion Middleware 11g [ID 1218603.1]*
Edited by: hyperEPM on Jun 8, 2012 5:04 PM

Dealer portal system SSL setting with multiple domain name

Hi gurus
I have a Dealer portal system.(It is java java stack system just like EP)
SSL certificate will expire in few days and I', planningl renew it soon.(in visual administrator key storage then send it to appropriate CA)
Currently DP is used only by A branch. However B branch is planning to use
the same DP system soon.
Two branches has different domain name such as
Abranch.dealer-portal-ap.net
Bbranch.dealer-portal-ap.net
The contents that each branch see will be distinguished by source code.
My question is
1) can I create a public private key pair in visual administrator with
CN = *.dealer-portal-ap.net?(Can I use * character)
2) If not, what should I do in this situation
thanks in advance

By the way there is only one server.
2 domain names are registered for 1 DP server

One database with multiple instance names

Dear all,
We would be very happy if anyone can provide me with some information of how RMAN operates.
Current situation: we have 2 machines running Oracle9i with just one database. The production database is "replicated" using EMC's TimeFinder/Snap. The differences are:
1. production database directory structure is slightly different than the replicated one: /usr/oraprod and /usr/orasnap respectively.
2. their pfiles are different: besides the differences in files location (controlfile, dumps,...), the instance_name are different (oraprod and orasnap respectively), but their db_name must be equal, which is oraprod.
3. at startup of the orasnap instance, all datafiles and redolog files must be adjusted/renamed to the orasnap directory structure (using a number of: alter database rename file) and the temporary tablespace needs to be recreated.
The orasnap instance is now ready for use... but problems arises within the RMAN repository. The oracat DB is the rman catalog. Connection to rman is done in this way:
$ORACLE_HOME/bin/rman target "sys/<password>@oraprod" CATALOG "catuser/<password>@oracat"
But "report schema;", whether the target is oraprod or orasnap, lists files which has the orasnap directory structure.
If the target is oraprod, then I expect to see the directory structure of oraprod and NOT the that of orasnap.
Did I overlooked something in here?
All help would be appreciated...
ps: see also my previous thread: "RMAN stops registering backups"

Hi Ebrian,
Another funny thing of RMAN's incarnations: rman seems not to be able to give a detailed backup listing (or restore some files) of the incarnation datafiles like:
RMAN> list backup;
BS Key Type LV Size Device Type Elapsed Time Completion Time
9266 Full 55G SBT_TAPE 00:41:37 19-NOV-07
BP Key: 9267 Status: AVAILABLE Tag: TAG20071119T021235
Piece Name: db_ORAPROD11771177639022355639022355
Controlfile Included: Ckp SCN: 4023549447 Ckp time: 19-NOV-07
List of Datafiles in backup set 9266
File LV Type Ckp SCN Ckp Time Name
1 Full 4023549460 19-NOV-07 /usr/oradata/oraprod/oradata2/system01.dbf
44 Full 4023549460 19-NOV-07 /usr/oradata/oraprod/oradata2/JAFFA_TSB_2.dbf
49 Full 4023549460 19-NOV-07 /usr/oradata/oraprod/oradata2/JAFFA_TSB_1.dbf
50 Full 4023549460 19-NOV-07 /usr/oradata/oraprod/oradata2/JAFFA_TSB.dbf
51 Full 4023549460 19-NOV-07 /usr/oradata/oraprod/oradata2/BLOB_TSP.dbf
Instead, we have only:
RMAN> list incarnation;
List of Database Incarnations
DB Key Inc Key DB Name DB ID CUR Reset SCN Reset Time
8357 8408 ORASNAP 2706083210 NO 1 06-MAR-06
8357 8358 ORASNAP 2706083210 YES 4014480736 15-NOV-07
8569 8620 ORASNAP 2706169607 NO 1 06-MAR-06
8569 8570 ORASNAP 2706169607 YES 4016907657 16-NOV-07
8990 9041 ORASNAP 2706322688 NO 1 06-MAR-06
8990 8991 ORASNAP 2706322688 YES 4020564274 17-NOV-07
3336 3337 ORAPROD 4063199190 YES 1 06-MAR-06
To know what is in (8990, 8991), we need to request:
SQL> select dbinc_key, fname from dfatt where dbinc_key = 8991
So, how can we treat incarnations? List, restore, ...

SAP authentication and SSO into BI4 with multiple SAP systems

We have already setup SAP authentication and SSO between ECC6 and BI4, e.g. to run CR 2011 reports with data based on ECC infosets, or BEx (operational BI on ECC). ECC is the main point of entry for users, so ECC user accounts and role imports are used in BI4.
Now if we add BW to this, with Crystal or WebI or Analysis OLAP sourcing data from BW, can we still leverage detailed authorizations in BW on the corresponding BW user - with user accounts and role imports in BI4 still being ECC-based?

Hi,
Let's say the trust relationship is setup between those systems. Then the simple example is to use Enterprise authentication in BI4, and assertion tickets are issued when making requests to ECC or BW. I assume LDAP/AD authentication would work as well.
>> You also have to setup trust between the BI 4 and ECC & between BI4 and BW. Thats part of the setup for the SSO Token Service.
But does this scenario rule out SAP authentication or not? I was hoping that I can still logon to BI4 with an ECC-issued logon ticket, and then BI4 would nevertheless issue assertion tickets for my BW alias.
>> And that is still possible. Setup the SSO Token Service, setup the aliases for the users. then you could logon with ECC credentials and run a BW report because the token service would then generate the token towards the BW system.
ingo

Multiple album name for one mp3

is it possible to tag the one mp3 with multiple album names?eg.most artists have greatest hits albums with their studio albums so the itunes user has to choose which one to delete from the library thus causing one or the other album to be incomplete if you burn it to cd.
one mp3 file on hard drive with 2 album tags would be good as it would save part listings

This is not an iTunes specific issue it applies to all media managers (e.g WMP).
The meta tags in MP3 (or other formats) only let you tag it with a single album name. I understand what you are getting at as a specific track might be in an album and then reissued as part of a greatest hits, and then as for example part of a "Now That's What I Call Music Volume n" type album. Storing one copy would save space.
However the files do not have this capability and disk space is cheap so who cares?
It is also the case the often the tracks are very slightly different, you can see this when you search for a track on the iTunes Store and often you will get several results (from different albums) and they have slightly different durations. They may have been remixed or re-recorded by the band at a different date.

SelectCmDevice with Multiple devicename

I have tried to do SelectCmDevice lookup with multiple phone names in the SOAP request. However, I found that the response contains information for ONE phone only. Is there anything I missed in my SOAP request?
REQUEST:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding">
<SOAP-ENV:Header/>
<SOAP-ENV:Body>
<SelectCmDevice sequence="1204504954781">
<CmSelectionCriteria>
<Class>Phone</Class>
<Model>255</Model>
<NodeName>172.31.1.11</NodeName>
<SelectBy>Name</SelectBy>
<MaxReturnedDevices>10</MaxReturnedDevices>
<SelectItems soapenc:arrayType="SelectItemss[3]">
<Item>SEPxxxxxxxxxxxx</Item>
<Item>SEPxxxxxxxxxxxy</Item>
<Item>SEPxxxxxxxxxxxz</Item>
</SelectItems>
</CmSelectionCriteria>
</SelectCmDevice>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
Can anyone point me is that my SOAP syntax error causing the problem? Thanks so much.

This is the SOAP response I received. Only single phone information is retrieved.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
http://schemas.cisco.com/ast/soap/">
1
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
Ok
172.31.1.11
false
SEPxxxxxxxxxxxz
172.31.213.36
2490-Registered,2193-Registered,3193-Registered,2155-Registered,3155-Registered
Phone
436
335
0
Yes
0
true
HKGCKC
Registered
0
2
0
Kathy Chan - 2490 - HK User
1204377181

Multiple registration with sip-ua

Hi,
someone know a way to do multiple registration with a single 2811 using sip-ua configuration with multiple accounts??
thnx
s.

Hi, I have got to authenticate more than one account in the SIP provider with the hidden command "credentials" the problem that I have now is how to route all the calls done to the second account to the extension 101.
I want that incoming calls from 964812530 goes to extension 100 and incoming calls from 965072519 goes to extension 101
How can I do it?
I have tried this but it's not running:
sip-ua
credentials username 965072510 password 115849534F43415C557B7967 realm beta.awa
voz.com
authentication username 964812539 password 13544744535D4E7A7A757A70
no remote-party-id
retry invite 4
retry response 3
retry bye 2
retry cancel 2
retry register 5
timers register 250
registrar ipv4:213.162.201.146 expires 60
sip-server ipv4:213.162.201.146
voice service voip
sip
voice translation-rule 1
rule 1 /1../ /964812539/
voice translation-rule 3
rule 1 /964812539/ /100/
voice translation-rule 4
rule 1 /965072510/ /101/
voice translation-profile SIPout
translate calling 1
voice translation-profile incoming
translate called 3
voice translation-profile incoming2
translate called 4
voip-incoming translation-profile incoming
All the incoming calls are going to extension 100
regards

RE: multiple named objects with the same name andinterface

David,
First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named anchored
objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get most of the
behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service (BindObject
method) it will first look in the local partition and see if there is a
local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and manually
registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating your
own SO without defining it as such in the development environment. BTW in
response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as well. If
your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the service object he is
calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance of the
service object.
Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no local copy
you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which one!
It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of my head and
without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
All,
More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
objects with the same name in more than one partition. There are two
situations in which this seems desirable:
1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value to
remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it has
environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote method
call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possible to
place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) in each
partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided. This
would only be useful for a service object whose state could be safely
replicated.
2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a Service
Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the called Service
Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same name
and the same interface in each partition, but varying the implementation
with the partition.
Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thing or a
bad thing?
David N. Foote
Consultant
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

David,
First I will start by saying that this can be done by using named anchored
objects and registering them yourself in the name service. There is
documentation on how to do this. And by default you will get most of the
behavior you desire. When you do a lookup in the name service (BindObject
method) it will first look in the local partition and see if there is a
local copy and give you that copy. By anchoring the object and manually
registering it in the name service you are programmatically creating your
own SO without defining it as such in the development environment. BTW in
response to your item number 1. This should be the case there as well. If
your "mobile" object is in the same partition where the service object he is
calling resides, you should get a handle to the local instance of the
service object.
Here is the catch, if you make a bind object call and there is no local copy
you will get a handle to a remote copy but you can not be sure which one!
It end ups as more or less a random selection. Off the top of my head and
without going to the doc, I am pretty sure that when you register an
anchored object you can not limit it's visibility to "User".
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of David Foote
Sent: Monday, June 22, 1998 4:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: multiple named objects with the same name and interface
All,
More than once, I have wished that Forte allowed you to place named
objects with the same name in more than one partition. There are two
situations in which this seems desirable:
1) Objects that are not distributed, but are mobile (passed by value to
remote objects), cannot safely reference a Service Object unless it has
environment visibility, but this forces the overhead of a remote method
call when it might not otherwise be necessary. If it were possible to
place a copy of the same Service Object (with user visibility) in each
partition, the overhead of a remote method call could be avoided. This
would only be useful for a service object whose state could be safely
replicated.
2) My second scenario also involves mobile objects referencing a Service
Object, but this time I would like the behavior of the called Service
Object to differ with the partition from which it is called.
This could be accomplished by placing Service Objects with the same name
and the same interface in each partition, but varying the implementation
with the partition.
Does anyone have any thoughts about why this would be a good thing or a
bad thing?
David N. Foote
Consultant
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

[svn] 949: Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name , it causes a ClassCastException in the server

Revision: 949
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-03-27 07:12:59 -0700 (Thu, 27 Mar 2008)
Log Message:
Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name, it causes a ClassCastException in the server
QA: Yes - try again with legacy-collection true and false.
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Details: Another try in fixing this bug. When legacy-collection is false, Actionscript Array on the client becomes Java Array on the server and my fix yesterday assumed this case. However, when legacy-collection is true, Actionscript Array becomes Java ArrayList on the server. So added code to handle this case.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-96
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/proxy/src/java/flex/messaging/services/http/proxy/RequestF ilter.java

Hi all!
Just to post the solution to this if anyone ever runs accross this thread...
For some reason i had it bad the first time, don't have time right now to see why but here is what worked for me:
HashMap primaryFile = new HashMap();
primaryFile.put("fileContent", bFile);
primaryFile.put("fileName", uploadedFile.getFilename());
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("primaryFile", primaryFile);
HashMap customDocMetadata = new HashMap();
HashMap [] properties = new HashMap[1];
HashMap customMetadataPropertyRoom = new HashMap();
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("name", "xRoom");
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("value", "SOME ROOM");
properties[0] = customMetadataPropertyRoom;
customDocMetadata.put("property", properties);
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("CustomDocMetaData", customDocMetadata);
Basically an unbounded wsdl type is an array of objects (HashMaps), makes sense, i thought i had it like this before, must have messed up somewhere...
Good luck all!

[svn] 931: Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name , it causes a ClassCastException in the server

Revision: 931
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-03-26 11:31:01 -0700 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008)
Log Message:
Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name, it causes a ClassCastException in the server
QA: Yes - we need automated tests for this basic case.
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Details: RequestFilter was not handling multiple headers with the same name properly.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-96
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/proxy/src/java/flex/messaging/services/http/proxy/RequestF ilter.java

Hi all!
Just to post the solution to this if anyone ever runs accross this thread...
For some reason i had it bad the first time, don't have time right now to see why but here is what worked for me:
HashMap primaryFile = new HashMap();
primaryFile.put("fileContent", bFile);
primaryFile.put("fileName", uploadedFile.getFilename());
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("primaryFile", primaryFile);
HashMap customDocMetadata = new HashMap();
HashMap [] properties = new HashMap[1];
HashMap customMetadataPropertyRoom = new HashMap();
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("name", "xRoom");
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("value", "SOME ROOM");
properties[0] = customMetadataPropertyRoom;
customDocMetadata.put("property", properties);
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("CustomDocMetaData", customDocMetadata);
Basically an unbounded wsdl type is an array of objects (HashMaps), makes sense, i thought i had it like this before, must have messed up somewhere...
Good luck all!

[svn] 889: Add test case for BLZ-82 where HttpService should return multiple headers with the same name .

Revision: 889
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-03-21 13:08:05 -0700 (Fri, 21 Mar 2008)
Log Message:
Add test case for BLZ-82 where HttpService should return multiple headers with the same name.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-82
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/remote/MultipleHeadersTest.jsp
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/proxyService/httpservice/MultiHe aderTest.mxml

Hi again,
this may be old news to some people, but I just realized we can have the desired benefits I originally listed (encapsulation, reuse, maintainability, security) TODAY by using pipelined functions and using the table() function in Apex report region queries.
So the report query basically becomes, for example (if get_employees is a pipelined function)
select * from table(my_package.get_employees(:p1_deptno))
The only downside compared to a (weakly typed) sys_refcursor is that you have to define the type you are returning in your package spec (or as an SQL type). So it's a bit more coding, but it's still worth it for the other benefits it provides.
I like Apex even better now! :-)
- Morten

Is it possible to search for multiple folders with the same name and...

Is it possible to search for multiple folders with the same name and then select them all and change the permissions on just those folders .i.e. Search for the budget folders in all client folders and lock them down to just the project managers. Without having to go to each folder and apply the permissions.

user11919409 wrote:
Is it possible to create a Clone database with the same name of source db using RMAN ...
yes
>
DB version is 11.2.0.2
Is it possible to clone a 11.2.0.2 database to 11.2.0.3 home location directly on a new server . If it starts in a upgrade mode , it is ok ....yes
Handle:     user11919409
Status Level:     Newbie (10)
Registered:     Dec 7, 2009
Total Posts:     102
Total Questions:     28 (22 unresolved)
why do you waste time here when you rarely get any answers to your questions?

SSO regapp registration with multiple net names

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for