ST12: Unexpected destructor called
Hi
I have SunStudio12 on some Solaris 10 machine.
CC -VCC: Sun C++ 5.9 SunOS_sparc 2007/05/03
uname -aSunOS sungolem 5.10 Generic_125100-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V250
I have some problems with the following test program which terminates with core due to unexpected call of destructor:
file:test.cc
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class A
char *_a;
public:
A(const char *t) { cout <<"A:ctor["<<t<<"]"<<endl; setdata(t);}
virtual ~A() { cout <<"A:dtor["<<_a<<"]"<<endl; delete _a;_a = NULL;}
void setdata(const char *data) { _a = new char [strlen(data)+1];strcpy(_a,data);}
const char * getdata() const { return _a;}
A( const A &a){ cout <<"A:copy_ctor["<<a._a<<"]"<<endl;setdata(a._a);}
bool operator == (const A&l, const A&r)
{ return (strcmp(l.getdata(),r.getdata()) == 0?true:false);}
int main()
A c ("321");
cout <<"1"<<endl;
//cout << "compare"<<(c == A("123")?"true":"false")<<endl;
cout <<"2"<<endl;
bool f = false;
bool isA = false;
if(
(f!= false)
(c == (isA?A("123"):A("321"))))
cout <<"3"<<endl;
else
cout <<"4"<<endl;
cout <<"5"<<endl;
}Compilation:
CC -g -o test.x test.ccResult of execution:
test.xA:ctor[321]
1
2
A:dtor[Segmentation fault (core dumped)
I tried with dbx:
>
1
2
A:dtor[signal SEGV (no mapping at the fault address) in strlen at 0xff030e38
0xff030e38: strlen+0x0018: ldub [%o2], %o1
Current function is A::~A
11 virtual ~A() { cout <<"A:dtor["<<_a<<"]"<<endl; delete _a;_a = NULL;}
(dbx) where
[1] strlen(0x3, 0x21fd0, 0x3, 0xff37f4e8, 0x3, 0xff3798f0), at 0xff030e38
[2] std::operator<<(0x21fd0, 0x3, 0xff37c194, 0x1, 0x0, 0x148), at 0xff3041e8
=>[3] A::~A(this = 0xffbfcfcc), line 11 in "test.cc"
[4] main(), line 33 in "test.cc"
(dbx) print *this
*this = {
_a = 0x3 "<bad address 0x3>"
Interesting thing - if you set optimization level to -xO3 then program works as expected:
CC -xO3 -g -o test.x test.cc
test.xA:ctor[321]
1
2
4
5
A:dtor[321]
Then I uncomment commented line and compiled without -g option:
CC -o test.x test.ccIn such case program exits unexpectedly without core:
test.x A:ctor[321]
1
compareA:ctor[123]
false
A:dtor[123]
2
A:dtor[
If option -g is added, then program works as expected:
CC -g -o test.x test.cc
test.xA:ctor[321]
1
compareA:ctor[123]
false
A:dtor[123]
2
4
5
A:dtor[321]
What is wrong?
PS: I tried all above with latest SunStudio11 and problem is not reproduced.
Thanks
It is likely a compiler bug. Thanks for reporting the problem. I filed bug 6570096.
Dmitry
Similar Messages
-
Facetime quit unexpectedly during calls
Hi. I am using FaceTime since one year. Since 1 month it quit unexpectedly. I m talking to someone and the conversation is closing all the time.
what can i do??If anyone has this problem in the future I found out what to do.
Close FaceTime
Go to folder:
username/Library/Containers/com.apple.FaceTime/Data/Library/Preferences
Then delete everything in the preference directory; however, do not delete the folder Preferences.
Restart Facetime.
All is good. -
Hi!!! My family is going on a cruise this summer. I do not want to but any internet plan on board or through verizon, as it can get quite costly with
two teenage daughters. But, we will be using our phone cameras. How do I block calls and texts, yet still use the camera? And does blocking them still result in no charges..roaming, international, on board, etc.? Thanks for all advice and answers!!!Another option you may have is to temporarily suspend service...that would guarantee you won't have any charges for unexpected texts/calls. Might be a little more extreme then you want to do though. Contact VZW for more details on that option if interested. I would echo the idea of just using a camera versus your iPhone unless for some reason you don't own an actual point and shoot camera. You can easily put the pics on your iPhone when you return home from your trip if that is the reason you were really wanting to use the iPhone for picture taking.
-
How can I call a hsqldb procedure from Java
Hello,
I am trying to call from Java a stored procedure but I keep having exceptions!!!
In addition, I have no idea how I can get the result of the procedure !!!!
I have spent the whole day in Internet.... no luck!!
===============================================
I[b] java.lang.Exception: +updatejava.sql.SQLException: Unexpected token: # in statement [ call MODIFY_FIELD_SEPARATOR(#) ]
at util.UtilBean.test_upd(UtilBean.java:369)
===============================================
The following procedures have been created and tested withing the database and there work.
- public static String manage_field_separator(String ifs)
-public static String manage_refresh_interval(int val)
The alias have been created:
CREATE ALIAS MODIFY_FIELD_SEPARATOR FOR "com.lucent.util.StoredProcedures.manage_field_separator";
CREATE ALIAS MODIFY_REFRESH_INTERVAL FOR "com.lucent.util.StoredProcedures.manage_frefresh_interval
My file.java contains the flollowing:
public String test_upd(String tableName, String paramValue)
throws Exception
String res="0";
Connection conn=null;
CallableStatement cs= null;
try
conn=DBConnection.DBConnect();
String p="MODIFY_"+tableName.toUpperCase()+"("+paramValue+")";
cs=conn.prepareCall( "{call "+p+"}");
cs.execute();
// Suppose to get the result res of the function!!!!
catch (SQLException e)
exceptionMessage="+update"+e.toString();
System.out.println("exceptionMessage="+exceptionMessage);
throw new Exception(exceptionMessage);
finally
Statement stmt=null;
DBConnection.closeConnection(conn,stmt);
return res;
}Obviously I am doing something wrong ..... but I don't know what!!!
Could you help me please?
THanks a lot!Thanks for your quick response.
I need to construct the name of the procedure on the fly because I don't know the name of the table I need to modify until excecution time.
I have modified the code the following way but it still does not work!!!
I still get the exception:
java.lang.Exception: +updatejava.sql.SQLException: Unexpected token CALL, requires SELECT in statement [(call MODIFY_FIELD_SEPARATOR(?)}]
at util.UtilBean.test_upd(UtilBean.java:380)
public String test_upd(String tableName, String paramValue)
throws Exception
String res="0";
Connection conn=null;
CallableStatement cs= null;
try
conn=DBConnection.DBConnect();
cs=conn.prepareCall( "(call MODIFY_"+tableName.toUpperCase()+"(?)}");
cs.setString( 1, paramValue);
cs.execute();
// Suppose to get the result res of the function!!!!
catch (SQLException e)
exceptionMessage="+update"+e.toString();
System.out.println("exceptionMessage="+exceptionMessage);
throw new Exception(exceptionMessage);
finally
Statement stmt=null;
DBConnection.closeConnection(conn,stmt);
return res;
} -
Hi all,
at a customer’s site I’ve a problem with a fresh installation of Backup Exec 2014. Every backup (full or incremental) always reports the following
error: “An unexpected error occurred when cleaning up snapshot volumes. Confirm that all snapped volumes are correctly re-synchronized with the original volumes.”.
It’s not a Backup Exec problem itself, also backups using “Windows Server Backup” failing with the same error.
On this site I have three servers; the error is only generated for one of them. Here’s a short overview:
Server1: Windows Server 2012 R2, latest patchlevel, physical machine, Domain Controller and Fileserver. Backup Exec is installed on this machine,
backup is written directly to SAS tape loader. There error is generated on this server.
Server2: Windows Server 2008 R2, latest patchlevel, virtual machine, running on Citrix Xen Server 6.2. Used for remote desktop services, no errors
on this server.
Server3: Windows Server 2012 R2, latest patchlevel, virtual machine, database server with some SQL Instances, no errors on this server.
As I said, error is reported only on server1, no matter if it is a full or an incremental backup. During the backup I found the following errors
is the event log (translated from a german system):
Event ID: 12293
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Error calling a routine on a Shadow Copy Provider. "{89300202-3cec-4981-9171-19f59559e0f2}" an error occured. Routinedetails Error calling Query(). [0x80042302] [hr = 0x80042302, unexpected component error of
the Volume Shadow Copy Service.
Process:
Volume Shadow Copy polling
Volume Shadow Copy delete
Context:
Executioncontext: Coordinator
Executionkontext: Coordinator
And
Event ID: 8193
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Unexpected error calling Routine "IVssCoordinator::Query" hr = 0x8004230f, Unexpected error Volume Shadow Copy Service Provider
Process:
Volume Shadow Copy delete
Context:
Executioncontext: Coordinator
There are some articles about this error in the knowledge base or web which does not help or do not apply to my environment for example:
http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH38338&actp=search&viewlocale=en_US&searchid=1423724381707
What I already have tried:
Disabled Antivirus during the whole backup
Installed latest Service Pack for Backup Exec
Rebooted the server
vssadmin list writers do not show any errors
consult eventid.net for other possible solutions
no limits set for vaa
Anymore ideas from you guys?
Best regards,Hi Shaon,
vssadmin list providers gave the following output:
vssadmin list providers
vssadmin 1.1 - Verwaltungsbefehlszeilenprogramm des Volumeschattenkopie-Dienstes
(C) Copyright 2001-2013 Microsoft Corp.
Anbietername: "Microsoft File Share Shadow Copy provider"
Anbietertyp: Dateifreigabe
Anbieterkennung: {89300202-3cec-4981-9171-19f59559e0f2}
Version: 1.0.0.1
Anbietername: "Microsoft Software Shadow Copy provider 1.0"
Anbietertyp: System
Anbieterkennung: {b5946137-7b9f-4925-af80-51abd60b20d5}
Version: 1.0.0.7
Unfortunately theres not Symantec VSS Provider listed.
Best regards,
Christoph -
WARNING SCAM Phone Calls purporting to be from BT ...
At 08:55 today I received a phone call from 0800 169 1608. An Automated message was left purporting to be from BT and prompting me to press numbers on my keypad I.e. if I was the Account holder press 1 etc. As I was concerned it could be something important, I tried to recall the number but connected to another automated message again purporting to be from BT and that if required, they would ring back. After Googling the phone number I became suspicious and contacted BT directly to see if they had any knowledge about calling me. They informed me that it was not BT, it was a SCAM call and to email them at [email protected] with the details. According some entries on Google this scammier is trying to obtain Account details and God knows whatever else ! This afternoon I received a call back from the Real BT reassuring me that it was definately not them calling earlier and that they would be carrying out an investigation and would recontact me again in a few days time.
So before you or anyone you know falls victim to the scheme, bear these tips in mind:
•Be suspicious of unexpected phone calls asking for personal or financial information, regardless of who they claim to represent.
•Be warned that banks will never ask you for your PIN or online information over the phone.
•Know that your bank will never ask you to withdraw money to hand over or transfer to another account.
•Your bank will never send anyone to your home to collect cash, a payment card or a cheque book.
•If you’re worried that the call may be real, hang up and call your bank through a different phone line.
•If you think the call is a scam, take note of the caller’s phone number and report it to Callercenter.com. Spread the word and warn others. -
Oracle 10g Discoverer Reports & export to xls fails for large reports
Hi ,
We have following configurations:
1: RHEL 5.4
2: Discoverer :Version 10.1.2.48.18
3: Oracle10g Apps Version : Version 10.1.2.0.2
Issue:
Most of small reports works fine ....but when large discoverer reports are executed the page
keeps on refreshing for 15-20 hours but no output ....same for export to xls ......
But same reports works fine in oracle9i for same data voulme....
Observations:
When on linux with top command the processes are monitored its observed that discoverer process
dis51ws dies for large reports after 1-2 minutes ...& the page keeps on refreshing but no output....
for 1-2 minutes it consumes 50-80% cpu utilisation then process disappears & cpu 80% idle ...
It seems that as 10g Apps is installed on RHEL 5.4 ...non certfified OS causing an issue...
Can any one adds more inputs in this regards......
we have checked logs : below are log details :
Below logs gives "Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions" for this report ...
1:
OC4J~OC4J_BI_Forms~default_island~1:
10/04/11 12:11:29 Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.2.0.2) initialized
10/04/11 12:11:59 Using oracle.reports.util.EnvironmentGlobal class
10/04/11 14:23:37 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
10/04/11 14:23:38 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
Session ID:2010041114240115278
10/04/11 14:25:42 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
10/04/11 14:25:42 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
Session ID:2010041114254315439
10/04/11 14:28:53 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
10/04/11 14:28:54 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
Session ID:2010041114285615691
10/04/11 14:29:13 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
10/04/11 14:29:13 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
Session ID:2010041114291315728
10/04/11 14:32:35 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
10/04/11 14:32:35 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
Session ID:2010041114323615949
10/04/11 14:32:48 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
10/04/11 14:32:48 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
Session ID:2010041114324815982
10/04/11 14:34:44 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
10/04/11 14:34:44 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
Session ID:2010041114344616128
10/04/11 14:34:55 Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions
10/04/11 14:34:55 Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
Session ID:2010041114345516155
10/04/11 14:36:25 Tutalii: /oracle10gas/app/oracle10g/discoverer/lib/discoverer5.jar archive
2:
Discoverer~SessionServer~12
Calling GetData on Preference Repository
Calling GetData on Preference Repository
Calling GetData on Preference Repository
Calling GetData on Preference Repository
Active Eul: EULADMIN
Calling GetData on Preference Repository
Calling GetData on Preference Repository
Calling GetData on Preference Repository
Calling GetData on Preference Repository
Calling GetData on Preference Repository
Calling GetData on Preference Repository
Calling GetData on Preference Repository
DCSCORBAInterface::Delete called
DCSCORBAInterface destructor called
DCSCORBAInterface::Delete called
DCSCORBAInterface destructor called
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
ASSERT [email protected]:436
3:
application.log
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Finding async request action forward
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Calling externalize
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.WorksheetModel.getStateString EXT_TOOL: dvtb xk-1ml versionzw1.0w kyxdvtbyxbisltyxbicho vzwwjyxjbisltyxjdvtby
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.WorksheetModel.getStateString EXT_VIEW: dv xk-1ml versionzw1.0w kyxdv bazw0w cszw25wyxpc vzw1wjyxjdvy
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.WorksheetModel.getStateString EXT_VIEW: lc
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.WorksheetModel.getStateString EXT_HS: dvhs
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.WorksheetModel.getStateString EXT_DS: dv_ds &qls_z!2=New GL Report.Clndr Id&arq=false&qls_x!14=Sheet 1.Closing Balance (Credit)&qls_x!3=New GL Report.Voucher No&qls_z!3=New GL Report.Frm Prd&fm=xml&qls_z!4=New GL Report.To Prd&qls_x!2=New GL Report.Prd Desc&qls_x!11=Sheet 1.Debit Amount&qls_x!4=New GL Report.Gl Voucher No&qls_x!9=Sheet 1.Opening Balance Debit&tss_s!0=New GL Report.Acct Id,lh,group,false&qls_x!1=New GL Report.Acct Sdesc&qls_z!1=New GL Report.Loc Desc&qls_x!10=Sheet 1.Opening Balance (Credit)&qls_x!12=Sheet 1.Credit Amount&aow=false&qls_x!7=New GL Report.Shrt Code&qls_x!13=Sheet 1.Closing Balance (Debit)&qls_x!6=New GL Report.Pmt Rct Dt&qls_x!8=New GL Report.Dtl Nrtn&sss=true&qls_x!5=New GL Report.Voucher Dt&qls_x!0=New GL Report.Acct Id&qls_z!0=New GL Report.Loc Id&ddsver=1
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.model.ViewerModelImpl.externalize [EXTERN_STATE]: $wksht$%24dv_ds%24%26qls_z%212%3DNew+GL+Report.Clndr+Id%26arq%3Dfalse%26qls_x%2114%3DSheet+1.Closing+Balance+%28Credit%29%26qls_x%213%3DNew+GL+Report.Voucher+No%26qls_z%213%3DNew+GL+Report.Frm+Prd%26fm%3Dxml%26qls_z%214%3DNew+GL+Report.To+Prd%26qls_x%212%3DNew+GL+Report.Prd+Desc%26qls_x%2111%3DSheet+1.Debit+Amount%26qls_x%214%3DNew+GL+Report.Gl+Voucher+No%26qls_x%219%3DSheet+1.Opening+Balance+Debit%26tss_s%210%3DNew+GL+Report.Acct+Id%2Clh%2Cgroup%2Cfalse%26qls_x%211%3DNew+GL+Report.Acct+Sdesc%26qls_z%211%3DNew+GL+Report.Loc+Desc%26qls_x%2110%3DSheet+1.Opening+Balance+%28Credit%29%26qls_x%2112%3DSheet+1.Credit+Amount%26aow%3Dfalse%26qls_x%217%3DNew+GL+Report.Shrt+Code%26qls_x%2113%3DSheet+1.Closing+Balance+%28Debit%29%26qls_x%216%3DNew+GL+Report.Pmt+Rct+Dt%26qls_x%218%3DNew+GL+Report.Dtl+Nrtn%26sss%3Dtrue%26qls_x%215%3DNew+GL+Report.Voucher+Dt%26qls_x%210%3DNew+GL+Report.Acct+Id%26qls_z%210%3DNew+GL+Report.Loc+Id%26ddsver%3D1%24dv%24xk-1ml+versionzw1.0w+kyxdv+bazw0w+cszw25wyxpc+vzw1wjyxjdvy%24wd%24false%24lc%24%24dvtb%24xk-1ml+versionzw1.0w+kyxdvtbyxbisltyxbicho+vzwwjyxjbisltyxjdvtby%24wvs%241101%24dvhs%24$cn$&vct=svd&cnk=cf_a101$ap$%26df%3D%26l%3D%26s%3D%26nc%3D%26dl%3D$expl$&sp=&node=&event=focus&state=(117)&root=63&wbt=2$prid$NEW_GL_REPORT%2F31$ctyp$viewer
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Storing state
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [INFO] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Externalize Perf: 8ms
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Saving Attributes
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Saving ApplicationRequest
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Checking for SSO mode
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Saving errors, messages
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Returning final forward: "/ExportProgress.uix" redirect: "false"
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [TRACE] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute ----------------------- End Request --------------------------
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [INFO] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.framework.ApplicationController.execute Total Request Time in AppCtrl: 18
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processForwardConfig processForwardConfig(ForwardConfig[name=long running operation,path=/ExportProgress.uix,redirect=false,contextRelative=false])
10/04/11 14:37:25 discoverer: [DEBUG] [AJPRequestHandler-ApplicationServerThread-17] oracle.discoverer.applications.viewer.view.DiscovererPageBroker.isCacheable Setting cacheable to: true
4: XML log:
log2010041114285615691.xml
<MSG_GROUP>DCS</MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcstim.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>184</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:29:13 2010
</LOG_TIME> ]]>
</SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
<MESSAGE><HEADER><TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2010-04-11T14:29:13+00:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING> <COMPONENT_ID>DISCOVER</COMPONENT_ID> <MSG_TYPE TYPE="NOTIFICATION"></MSG_TYPE><MSG_LEVEL>4</MSG_LEVEL> <HOST_ID>2010041114285615691</HOST_ID> <MODULE_ID>DCS</MODULE_ID> </HEADER> <PAYLOAD><MSG_TEXT><![CDATA[Timer started.]]></MSG_TEXT> <SUPPL_DETAIL><![CDATA[
<MSG_GROUP>DCS</MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcstim.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>162</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:29:13 2010
</LOG_TIME> ]]>
</SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
<MESSAGE><HEADER><TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2010-04-11T14:29:13+00:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING> <COMPONENT_ID>DISCOVER</COMPONENT_ID> <MSG_TYPE TYPE="TRACE"></MSG_TYPE><MSG_LEVEL>5</MSG_LEVEL> <HOST_ID>2010041114285615691</HOST_ID> <MODULE_ID>DCS</MODULE_ID> </HEADER> <PAYLOAD><MSG_TEXT><![CDATA[Return DCSModelInterface::SendReceiveData(kScheduleInterface, inTable, outTable)
outTable = DCITable
Length=0
]]></MSG_TEXT> <SUPPL_DETAIL><![CDATA[
<MSG_GROUP>DCS</MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcsmdli.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>259</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:29:13 2010
</LOG_TIME> ]]>
</SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
<MESSAGE><HEADER><TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2010-04-11T14:29:13+00:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING> <COMPONENT_ID>DISCOVER</COMPONENT_ID> <MSG_TYPE TYPE="NOTIFICATION"></MSG_TYPE><MSG_LEVEL>4</MSG_LEVEL> <HOST_ID>2010041114285615691</HOST_ID> <MODULE_ID>DCS</MODULE_ID> </HEADER> <PAYLOAD><MSG_TEXT><![CDATA[DCSModelInterface::SendReceiveData(kScheduleInterface)]]></MSG_TEXT> <SUPPL_DETAIL><![CDATA[
<MSG_GROUP>DCS </MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcsmdli.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>226</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:29:13 2010
</LOG_TIME> <LOG_SIZE>0</LOG_SIZE> <EXTRA_INFO><MethodEnd duration="0.1" sizeChange="0" >
real 0m0.1s
user 0m0.900s
sys 0m0.109s
</MethodEnd></EXTRA_INFO> ]]>
</SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
<MESSAGE><HEADER><TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2010-04-11T14:37:13+00:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING> <COMPONENT_ID>DISCOVER</COMPONENT_ID> <MSG_TYPE TYPE="NOTIFICATION"></MSG_TYPE><MSG_LEVEL>4</MSG_LEVEL> <HOST_ID>2010041114285615691</HOST_ID> <MODULE_ID>DCS</MODULE_ID> </HEADER> <PAYLOAD><MSG_TEXT><![CDATA[Timer stopped.]]></MSG_TEXT> <SUPPL_DETAIL><![CDATA[
<MSG_GROUP>DCS</MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcstim.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>184</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:37:13 2010
</LOG_TIME> ]]>
</SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
<MESSAGE><HEADER><TSTZ_ORIGINATING>2010-04-11T14:37:13+00:00</TSTZ_ORIGINATING> <COMPONENT_ID>DISCOVER</COMPONENT_ID> <MSG_TYPE TYPE="NOTIFICATION"></MSG_TYPE><MSG_LEVEL>4</MSG_LEVEL> <HOST_ID>2010041114285615691</HOST_ID> <MODULE_ID>DCS</MODULE_ID> </HEADER> <PAYLOAD><MSG_TEXT><![CDATA[Timer started.]]></MSG_TEXT> <SUPPL_DETAIL><![CDATA[
<MSG_GROUP>DCS</MSG_GROUP> <PROCESS_ID>15691</PROCESS_ID> <FILE_NAME>dcstim.cpp</FILE_NAME> <LINE_NUMBER>162</LINE_NUMBER> <THREAD_ID>-1283799360</THREAD_ID> <LOG_TIME>Sun Apr 11 14:37:13 2010
</LOG_TIME> ]]>
</SUPPL_DETAIL> </PAYLOAD> </MESSAGE>
Regards,Hi ,
as per Note: 466697.1 ....its an memory error....& need to increase MaxVirtualDiskMem and MaxVirtualHeapMem
But we already have slowly increased MaxVirtualDiskMem and MaxVirtualHeapMem to below very high values ...but the issue remains same.......
as per note we are getting Logkeys: exceptions discoiv.servlet_exceptions error but
after that we are not getting below error ............
Unexpected error in state machine: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
Hence I presume that its different issue rather than memmory....
Below are pref.txt values..........
CacheFlushPercentage = 25 # Percent of cache flushed if the cache is full. valid values 0 - 100%.
MaxVirtualDiskMem = 9294967296 # Maximum amount of disk memory allowed for the data cache. Should be greater than or equal to MaxVirtualHeapMem
MaxVirtualHeapMem = 4294967296 # Maximum amount of heap memory allowed for the data cache.
QueryBehavior = 0 # Action to take after opening a workbook (0 = Run Query Automatically, 1 = Don't Run Query, 2 = Ask for Confirmation)
Also we have raised an SR & as per SR .............all below settings are tried as per SR except for applying a recent patch....
====================================================================
Discoverer performance is largely determined by how well the database
has been designed and tuned for queries.
A well-designed database will perform significantly better than a poorly
designed database.
Workbook design can also affect query performance.
1. Apply latest Discoverer patch as documented in <<Note:237607.1>>
'ALERT: Required and Recommended Patch Levels For All Discoverer Version'.
2. Increase the maximum JVM heap memory:
In general, the default values for the minimum heap (-Xms) memory and
maximum heap (-Xmx) memory are sufficient.
However, if your organization consistently runs large Discoverer queries
then you may benefit from increasing the maximum heap memory from the
default values.
This is recomended if your users are typically running large queries via
Discoverer Viewer.
Increasing the JVM memory can help to avoid "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError"
in Discoverer Viewer:
Please see <<Note 563960.1>>, Best Practice: Configuring The
OC4J_BI_Forms JVM For
Discoverer Viewer/Portlet 10g Performance And Stability for specific
details.
3. Disable Query Prediction:
Query Prediction provides an estimate of the time required to retrieve
the information in a query.
The Query Prediction appears before the query and consumes time.
Edit the <oracle_home>/discoverer/util/pref.txt on the middle-tier
server and set:
QPPEnable=0
Also set:
QPPObtainCostMethod = 0
4. Uncheck the 'Enable fantrap detection' checkbox.
When the box is checked, every query generated by Discoverer is
interrogated. Discoverer will detect a fan trap and rewrite the query to
ensure that the aggregation is done at the correct level.
Please refer to <<Note:210553.1>>, Oracle BI Discoverer: Fan Trap
Resolution - Correct Results
Everytime for more information on fantraps.
To disable, in Plus go to Tools -> Options -> Advanced -> Fan Trap
settings.
In Viewer go to Preferences and uncheck the box.
5. Disable Materialized Views/Summaries
In pref.txt add parameter:
MaterializedViewRedirectionBehavior = 0
Value equal to 0 ensures that Materialized View (MV) Redirection is
always performed when MVs are available.
6. Improve query performance by optimizing the SQL.
In pref.txt modify/add following parameters:
SQLFlatten = 0
SQLItemTrim = 0
SQLJoinTrim = 0
UseOptimizerHints = 0
If value of SQLFlatten is 1 then Discoverer will merge inline views in
the query SQL where ever possible.
In case of SQLItemTrim, Discoverer will remove unused folder items from
the query SQL where possible and for SQLJoinTrim Discoverer will remove
unnecessary joins from the query where possible.
UseOptimizerHints will add Optimizer hints to SQL if set >
0.Unnecessarily making Discoverer perform these checks consumes
resources and rather than increasing the performance may reduce the same. So unless you feel these checks have to be performed depending on
requirements, assign zero to these parameters.
7. When Discoverer builds a query, Discoverer makes a database security
check to confirm that the user has access to the tables referenced in
the folders. Avoiding this check can save time.
So in pref.txt underDatabase section add:
ObjectsAlwaysAccessible = 1
8. Whenever you are creating conditions, ensure that you match the Case.
This in turn can reduce the time Discoverer spends on changing the Case
and matching.
For example:
option Upper(Department) in (Upper('VIDEO SALES')
9. Ensure that summaries are refreshed periodically in Discoverer
Administrator.
10. Increase the amount of memory available for the Discoverer data cache. Please refer to <<Note 245752.1>>, Explaining Oracle BI Discoverer
Session Memory Management
And Server Cache Settings.
11. Performance may be enhanced by enabling OracleAS Web Cache.
==================================================================
Thanks for your reply....................
Regards, -
Hybrid Search not working from SharePoint 2013 Online to SharePoint On-premise
Hi,
I have setup a SharePoint 2013 Hybrid environment setup with the following –
Windows Server 2012 R2
SharePoint Server 2013 with April 2014 CU
SQL Server 2014
ADFS 3.0 using SSO with Web proxy and DirSync
SharePoint 2013 Online tenant on Office 365 Enterprise Subscription
I have configured the Hybrid following the article
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj838715(v=office.15).aspx and configured Hybrid Search. The hybrid environment was working fine including Search both ways initially
but after upgrade to April CU 2014 (along with upgrade to SQL 2014 from SQL 2012), now search from SharePoint online to SharePoint in-Premise is not working anymore.
I am still able login with the federated IDs in both the environments and get results from SharePoint Online in SharePoint in-Premise environment.
I have already tried most of the troubleshooting steps mentioned at
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn518363(v=office.15).aspx
Now every time, we perform a search in our SharePoint Online site, which is configured to show hybrid results from SharePoint in-premise, we don’t get results from in-premise and instead we see the following error logged in SharePoint
In-premise Web Server –
Error - An exception occurred when trying to issue security token: Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value.
And ULS log shows the following – Even though the message seems apparent that there could be duplicate users in user profile Application, but that’s not the case. There are just 2 unique users added there.
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Portal Server
User Profiles ae0sx
Unexpected Error trying to search in the UPA. The exception message is 'System.ArgumentException: Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPIdentityProviders.GetIdentityProviderType(String
value) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.SearchUsingNameIdOrThrow(UserProfileManager upManager, String nameId, String nameIdIssuer) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)' 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly Verbose
Leaving Monitored Scope (Executing the user mapping operation in GetMappedIdentityClaim()). Execution Time=1.4449 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Portal Server
User Profiles ae0su High The set of claims
could not be mapped to a single user identity. Exception Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value has occured. 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly Verbose
Leaving Monitored Scope (Inside SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetClaimFromExternalMapper(); calling the registered SPIdentityClaimMapper). Execution Time=1.5596
4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication ae0tc
High The registered mappered failed to resolve to one identity claim. Exception: System.InvalidOperationException: Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value ---> System.ArgumentException:
Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPIdentityProviders.GetIdentityProviderType(String value) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.SearchUsingNameIdOrThrow(UserProfileManager
upManager, String nameId, String nameIdIssuer) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)
--- End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft... 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59* w3wp.exe (0x1C88)
0x2494 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication
ae0tc High ....Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetMappedIdentityClaim(Uri context, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) ...
4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication af3zp
Unexpected STS Call Claims Saml: Problem getting output claims identity. Exception: 'System.InvalidOperationException: Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value ---> System.ArgumentException:
Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPIdentityProviders.GetIdentityProviderType(String value) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.SearchUsingNameIdOrThrow(UserProfileManager
upManager, String nameId, String nameIdIssuer) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) ---
End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft.O... 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint
Foundation Claims Authentication fo1t
Monitorable STS Call: Failed to issue new security token. Exception: System.InvalidOperationException: Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value ---> System.ArgumentException:
Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPIdentityProviders.GetIdentityProviderType(String value) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.SearchUsingNameIdOrThrow(UserProfileManager
upManager, String nameId, String nameIdIssuer) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)
--- End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft.Office.Server.Secu... 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59* w3wp.exe (0x1C88)
0x2494 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication
fo1t Monitorable ...rity.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager upManager, IEnumerable`1
identityClaims) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetMappedIdentityClaim(Uri context, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.ShareP... 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59* w3wp.exe (0x1C88)
0x2494 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication
fo1t Monitorable ...oint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetClaimFromExternalMapper(Uri contextUri, List`1 claims)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.ResolveUserIdentityClaim(Uri contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetIdentityClaim(Uri contextUri,
ClaimCollection inputClaims, SPCallingIdentityType callerType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetLogonIdentityClaim(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity inputIdentity, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity,
SPCallingIdentityType callerType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.EnsureSharePointClaims(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityTy... 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59* w3wp.exe (0x1C88)
0x2494 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication
fo1t Monitorable ...pe callerType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo
requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.SecurityTokenService.SecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal principal, RequestSecurityToken request)
4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly Verbose
Leaving Monitored Scope (SPSecurityTokenService.Issue). Execution Time=6.3185 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____CPU Cycles=12774004 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Execution Time=6.3185 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nasq Verbose
Entering monitored scope (CleanUpSecurityTokenServiceOperation). Parent ExecuteSecurityTokenServiceOperationServer 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly Verbose
Leaving Monitored Scope (CleanUpSecurityTokenServiceOperation). Execution Time=0.0282 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____CPU Cycles=14832078 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Execution Time=0.0282 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly Medium
Leaving Monitored Scope (ExecuteSecurityTokenServiceOperationServer). Execution Time=7.2841 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____WebPart Events Offsets=0 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____User Address= 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Log Correlation Id=4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c445282f9184 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Service Calls=0 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Claims Counter=0 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Critical Events=0 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____ULS Large Gap= 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Execution Time=7.2841 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____CPU Cycles=0 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Current SharePoint Operations=0 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____SPRequest Objects=2 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Distributed Cache=0 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____SQL Query Count=0 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Current User= 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Request Management= 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Page Checkout Level=Published 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Logging Correlation Data 77a3 Verbose
Ending correlation. Transfer to 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Unified Logging Service cn4g Verbose
Trace level override is turned off. 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1C88) 0x2494 SharePoint Foundation
Logging Correlation Data 77a3 Verbose
Ending correlation. 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nasq Verbose
Entering monitored scope (CleanUpSecurityTokenServiceOperation). Parent ExecuteSecurityTokenServiceOperationCaller:http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Issue 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly Verbose
Leaving Monitored Scope (CleanUpSecurityTokenServiceOperation). Execution Time=0.0257 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Execution Time=0.0257 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____CPU Cycles=2377140 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly Verbose
Leaving Monitored Scope (ExecuteSecurityTokenServiceOperationCaller:http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Issue). Execution Time=13.2855 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Execution Time=13.2855 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____CPU Cycles=0 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication fsq7
High SPSecurityContext: Request for security token failed with exception: System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[System.ServiceModel.ExceptionDetail]: Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name:
value (Fault Detail is equal to An ExceptionDetail, likely created by IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults=true, whose value is: System.InvalidOperationException: Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value ----> System.ArgumentException:
Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPIdentityProviders.GetIdentityProviderType(String value) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.SearchUsingNameIdOrThrow(UserProfileManager
upManager, ... 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59* w3wp.exe (0x1EEC)
0x26BC SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication
fsq7 High ...String nameId, String nameIdIssuer) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) --- End of inner ExceptionDetail stack trace --- at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager upManager,
IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileI...). 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication 8306
Critical An exception occurred when trying to issue security token: Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown. Parameter name: value. 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly Verbose
Leaving Monitored Scope ([S2S] Getting token from STS and setting Thread Identity). Execution Time=16.83 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Execution Time=16.83 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____CPU Cycles=7084490 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly Medium
Leaving Monitored Scope (Application Authentication Pipeline). Execution Time=20.6415 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____Execution Time=20.6415 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring nass Verbose
____CPU Cycles=14789795 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
Application Authentication ajezs High SPApplicationAuthenticationModule:
Error authenticating request, Error details { Header: {0}, Body: {1} }. Available parameters: 3001000;reason="There has been an error authenticating the request.";category="invalid_client" {"error_description":"Exception
of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown.\u000d\u000aParameter name: value"} . 4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59 w3wp.exe (0x1EEC) 0x26BC SharePoint Foundation
General
8nca Medium Application error when access /_vti_bin/sites.asmx, Error=Exception of type 'System.ArgumentException' was thrown.
Parameter name: value at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.ReadResponse(Message response) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken rst, RequestSecurityTokenResponse&
rstr) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken rst) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForContext(Uri context, Boolean bearerToken, SecurityToken
onBehalfOf, SecurityToken actAs, SecurityToken delegateTo, SPRequestSecurityTokenProperties properties) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForApplicationAuthentication(Uri context, SecurityToken onBe...
4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
06/04/2014 12:58:41.59* w3wp.exe (0x1EEC)
0x26BC SharePoint Foundation General
8nca Medium ...halfOf)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.<>c__DisplayClass4.<GetLocallyIssuedToken>b__3() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.ConstructIClaimsPrincipalAndSetThreadIdentity(HttpApplication httpApplication, HttpContext httpContext, SPFederationAuthenticationModule fam) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.AuthenticateRequest(Object
sender, EventArgs e) at System.Web.HttpApplication.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)
4c8b979c-f112-d050-9764-c834ee4cf36d
Any ideas?
Anupam ShrivastavaI am experiencing the same issue. Don't have the answer yet about what's wrong exactly. And my SSO works fine too.
I know precisely what makes the SharePoint throw the ArgumentException, but I can't yet figure out how to influence this behavior. I will respond back if I find out, but I hope the following will create an "aha moment" for someone.
So the SP Online issues an OAuth request to the on-prem SharePoint. If verbose logging is on for the Claims category, you may see how it reads these claims. One of them is this:
Claim['nii':'urn:federation:microsoftonline']
Using this claim and the nameid claim the profile mapping logic then reports the following immediately before the error (Set User Profiles to verbose to see this):
Creating encoded sid for nameid '100300008b29cb02' and nameidissuer 'urn:federation:microsoftonline'
Inspecting this logic with Reflector, I can see that it then attempts to infer the identity provider type from the nameidissuer, and throws the exception, because "federation" is not what it expects. It expects either "windows", "trusted" or "forms" for
the provider type.
So the user's actions to lead to this error were as follows:
1. I connect to the Office 365 portal, and get redirected to my ADFS server (same domain for the ADFS server, on-prem SharePoint, and the user accounts).
2. I log on, and from the SP Online portal I issue my search query using a result source configured as per the Hybrid TechNet guidance.
So thanks in advance for any suggestions, on what it could be. -
We have a SharePoint Enterprise 2013 system at RTM level. We've installed Workflow Manager 1.0 by following the steps at
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj658588.aspx. For the final step of Validating the Installation we created a simple list-level workflow and verified that the workflow
is invoked successfully. This is working successfully, but only for a single user. If other users in the same site collection try to invoke the workflow on this same list we get the ULS Log Error:
Claims Authentication af3zp Unexpected STS Call Claims Saml: Problem getting output claims identity. Exception: 'Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was not found. --->
System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated.
followed by:
Failed to issue new security token. Exception: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was not found. ---> System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated.
(as details below).
All accounts that are attempting to use the Test Workflow (both working and non-working user accounts) are valid AD accounts and are included in the User Profile Sync that runs nightly. All have Contribute or Design permission level (and for testing,
Full Control).
What could cause the Claims Authentication to fail when certain users attempt to launch the workflow?
Thank you for your response.
Jim Mac.
08/29/2013 10:22:51.94 w3wp.exe (0x2020) 0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication af3zp Unexpected STS Call Claims Saml: Problem getting output claims identity. Exception: 'Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was
not found. ---> System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated. at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceAccounts, Type targetType,
Boolean forceSuccess) at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(Type targetType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdentity,
SPClaim loginClaim) --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdent... 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
08/29/2013 10:22:51.94* w3wp.exe (0x2020) 0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication af3zp Unexpected ...ity, SPClaim loginClaim) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKey(String
encodedIdentityClaimSuffix) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.CreateTokenCacheReferenceFromTokenSignature(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentTokenCacheReferenceClaim(SPRequestInfo
requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope)'. 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
08/29/2013 10:22:51.94 w3wp.exe (0x2020) 0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication fo1t Monitorable STS Call: Failed to issue new security token. Exception: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was not found. --->
System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated. at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceAccounts, Type targetType, Boolean forceSuccess)
at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(Type targetType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdentity, SPClaim loginClaim)
--- End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdentity, SPClaim logi... 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
08/29/2013 10:22:51.94* w3wp.exe (0x2020) 0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication fo1t Monitorable ...nClaim) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKey(String encodedIdentityClaimSuffix)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.CreateTokenCacheReferenceFromTokenSignature(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentTokenCacheReferenceClaim(SPRequestInfo
requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Securi... 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
08/29/2013 10:22:51.94* w3wp.exe (0x2020) 0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation
Claims Authentication fo1t Monitorable ...tyTokenService.SecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal principal, RequestSecurityToken request) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request) 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583Hi Aries,
I am facing issue with work flow where Workflow goes to Suspend mode.
I am facing an issue with SP2013 Custom Workflow developed using Visual Studio 2012.
Objective of the Custom workflow: User fills the form and submit, list get updated and workflow will initiate and go for the process.
Issue: After the deployment of WF, for first time when user is filling the form and submit, list is getting updated. But the Workflow Goes to "Suspend" mode. (
This Custom Workflow has a configuration file where we are providing other details including ID of Impersonator (farm is running under Claim Based Authentication).
Work flow works fine once when the Impersonator initiate the workflow (Fill the form and submit for approval) and everything works fine after that.
Following steps are already performed
1.Make sure User profile synchronization is started.
2.Make sure the user is not the SharePoint system user.
3.Make sure the user by whom you are logged is available in User Profile list.
4.Step full synchronization of User Profile Application.
From the ULS logs it seems the user's security token from the STS service and User profile service is not being issued.
Appreciate any thoughts or solution.
Following are the log files.
<-------------------------------Information taken from "http://YYYY.XXXXX.com/sites/xxxx/_layouts/15/wrkstat.aspx" where it is showing workflow status as "Suspend"------->
http://yyyy.XXXX.com/sites/xxxx/_vti_bin/client.svc/sp.utilities.utility.ResolvePrincipalInCurrentcontext(input=@ParamUser,scopes='15',sources='15',inputIsEmailOnly='false',addToUserInfoList='False')?%40ParamUser='i%3A0%23.w%7CXXXXX%5Csps_biscomdev'
Correlation Id: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-bfb1-70bc172425e8 Instance Id: 14a985a0-60c8-42db-a42c-c752190b8106
RequestorId: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-0000-000000000000. Details: RequestorId: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-0000-000000000000. Details: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the workflow instance. Exception details: System.ApplicationException: HTTP 401
{"error_description":"The server was unable to process the request due to an internal error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug>
configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs."} {"x-ms-diagnostics":["3001000;reason=\"There
has been an error authenticating the request.\";category=\"invalid_client\""],"SPRequestGuid":["f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8654-672758a68234"],"request-id":["f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8654-672758a68234"],"X-FRAME-OPTIONS":["SAMEORIGIN"],"SPRequestDuration":["34"],"SPIisLatency":["0"],"Server":["Microsoft-IIS\/7.5"],"WWW-Authenticate":["Bearer
realm=\"b14e1e0f-257f-42ec-a92d-377479e0ec8d\",client_id=\"00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000\",trusted_issuers=\"00000005-0000-0000-c000-000000000000@*,[email protected]79e0ec8d\"","NTLM"],"X-Powered-By":["ASP.NET"],"MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices":["15.0.0.4420"],"X-Content-Type-Options":["nosniff"],"X-MS-InvokeApp":["1;
RequireReadOnly"],"Date":["Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:48:07 GMT"]} at Microsoft.Activities.Hosting.Runtime.Subroutine.SubroutineChild.Execute(CodeActivityContext context) at System.Activities.CodeActivity.InternalExecute(ActivityInstance
instance, ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager bookmarkManager) at System.Activities.Runtime.ActivityExecutor.ExecuteActivityWorkItem.ExecuteBody(ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager bookmarkManager, Location resultLocation)
ULS Log
04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Authentication Authorization agb9s Medium OAuth request. IsAuthenticated=False, UserIdentityName=, ClaimsCount=0 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Runtime ajd6k Verbose Value for isAnonymousAllowed is : False f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Runtime ajd6l Verbose Value for checkAuthenticationCookie is : True f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly)). Execution Time=18.7574119057031 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 PowerShell.exe (0x29BC) 0x2B9C SharePoint Foundation General narq Verbose Releasing SPRequest with allocation Id {AF89E1D7-C47F-467B-8FD4-D7DC768820EE}
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly)). Parent No
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80.
04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Logging Correlation Data xmnv Medium Name=Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Application Authentication Pipeline). Parent Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication ah25l Medium SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandler: ValidateActorIsSelfIssuer! Issuer '00000005-0000-0000-c000-000000000000' is not self
issuer. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Getting Site Subscription Id). Parent [S2S] Getting token from STS and setting Thread Identity f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Getting Site Subscription Id). Execution Time=0.341314329055788 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Reading token from Cache using token signature). Parent [S2S] Getting token from STS and setting Thread
Identity f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General ajji6 High Unable to write SPDistributedCache call usage entry. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Reading token from Cache using token signature). Execution Time=7.5931438213516 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Application Authentication ajwpx Medium SPApplicationAuthenticationModule: Failed to build cache key for user f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Topology aeayb Medium SecurityTokenServiceSendRequest: RemoteAddress: 'http://localhost:32843/SecurityTokenServiceApplication/securitytoken.svc' Channel:
'Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.IWSTrustChannelContract' Action: 'http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Issue' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:fd5eba94-c39d-4667-89bd-089411c87f09' f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.77 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Topology aeax9 Medium SecurityTokenServiceReceiveRequest: LocalAddress: 'http://c1vspwfe01.vitas.com:32843/SecurityTokenServiceApplication/securitytoken.svc'
Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Issue' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:fd5eba94-c39d-4667-89bd-089411c87f09' f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.77 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (ExecuteSecurityTokenServiceOperationServer). Parent No f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication ah25l Medium SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandler: ValidateActorIsSelfIssuer! Issuer '00000005-0000-0000-c000-000000000000' is not self
issuer. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General narq Verbose Releasing SPRequest with allocation Id {F17590DF-49D9-439D-86BC-5AE6416BB765} f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up site
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General narq Verbose Releasing SPRequest with allocation Id {3847D5A4-15C6-4AF9-B062-E22BB555DF4F} f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0s1 High Identity claims mapped to '0' user profiles. Claims: [nameid: '', nii: 'windows', upn: '', smtp: '', sip: ''], User Profiles: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0sr Unexpected UserProfileException caught.. Exception Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException: 3001002;reason=The
incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() is thrown. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0su High The set of claims could not be mapped to a single user identity. Exception 3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped
to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. has occured. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication ae0tc High The registered mappered failed to resolve to one identity claim. Exception: Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException:
3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetMappedIdentityClaim(Uri context, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetClaimFromExternalMapper(Uri
contextUri, List`1 claims) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication af3zp Unexpected STS Call Claims Saml: Problem getting output claims identity. Exception: 'Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException:
3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetMappedIdentityClaim(Uri context, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetClaimFromExternalMapper(Uri
contextUri, List`1 claims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.ResolveUserIdentityClaim(Uri contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetIdentityClaim(Uri
contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims, SPCallingIdentityType callerType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetLogonIdentityClaim(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity inputIdentity, IClaimsIdentity
outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.EnsureSharePointClaims(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope)'. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication fo1t Monitorable STS Call: Failed to issue new security token. Exception: Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException:
3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode) at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetMappedIdentityClaim(Uri context, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetClaimFromExternalMapper(Uri
contextUri, List`1 claims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.ResolveUserIdentityClaim(Uri contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetIdentityClaim(Uri
contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims, SPCallingIdentityType callerType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetLogonIdentityClaim(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity inputIdentity, IClaimsIdentity
outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.EnsureSharePointClaims(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.SecurityTokenService.SecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal principal, RequestSecurityToken request) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal
principal, RequestSecurityToken request) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (ExecuteSecurityTokenServiceOperationServer). Execution Time=17.1551132895382 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication fsq7 High SPSecurityContext: Request for security token failed with exception: System.ServiceModel.FaultException: The server was
unable to process the request due to an internal error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in
order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs. at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.ReadResponse(Message
response) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken rst, RequestSecurityTokenResponse& rstr) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken
rst) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForContext(Uri context, Boolean bearerToken, SecurityToken onBehalfOf, SecurityToken actAs, SecurityToken delegateTo, SPRequestSecurityTokenProperties properties) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication 8306 Critical An exception occurred when trying to issue security token: The server was unable to process the request due to an internal
error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to
the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs.. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Application Authentication Pipeline). Execution Time=52.3525336320678 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Application Authentication ajezs High SPApplicationAuthenticationModule: Error authenticating request, Error details { Header: {0}, Body: {1} }. Available
parameters: 3001000;reason="There has been an error authenticating the request.";category="invalid_client" {"error_description":"The server was unable to process the request due to an internal error. For more information
about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing as
per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs."} . f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 8nca Medium Application error when access /sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc, Error=The server was unable to process the request due to an internal
error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to
the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs. at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.ReadResponse(Message response) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken
rst, RequestSecurityTokenResponse& rstr) at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken rst) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForContext(Uri context,
Boolean bearerToken, SecurityToken onBehalfOf, SecurityToken actAs, SecurityToken delegateTo, SPRequestSecurityTokenProperties properties) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForApplicationAuthentication(Uri context,
SecurityToken onBehalfOf) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.<>c__DisplayClass4.<GetLocallyIssuedToken>b__3() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated
secureCode) at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.ConstructIClaimsPrincipalAndSetThreadIdentity(HttpApplication httpApplication, HttpContext httpContext, SPFederationAuthenticationModule fam)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.AuthenticateRequest(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.Web.HttpApplication.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly)). Execution Time=62.2890618779761 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
Regards
Sakti -
Studio 12: C compiler generates bad code with -m64 -KPIC -xO2
Hello,
after upgrading my Solaris 10/x64 machine from Studio 11 to Studio 12 some problems were fixed, but others came up; like this one:
I have a code snippet that obviously causes the C compiler to generate wrong code if compiled with options -m64 -KPIC -xO2. If any of these options are missing, it runs fine. Here's the example code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <strings.h>
static int do_something() { return 0; }
static int foo() {
fprintf(stderr, "\n!! BUG: BAD CODE! unexpected function call foo()!\n\n");
return 222;
static int bar() {
fprintf(stdout, "\nOK: bar() called\n\n");
return 0;
static const struct {
const char* name;
int (*func)();
int flag;
} tab[] = {
{ "foo", &foo, 0 },
{ "bar", &bar, 0 },
{ 0, 0, 0 }
int main(int argc, const char** argv) {
int i;
for (i=0; tab.name; i++) {
if( strcmp(tab[i].name, "bar") == 0 ) {
if(tab[i].flag) { /* not reached */
if(!do_something()) {
return 2;
return (*tab[i].func)();
return 1; /* not reached */
Many lines seem to be bogus, but they are actually needed to reproduce the problem.
This is what happens:# cc -m64 -KPIC -xO2 bug.c && ./a.out ; echo $?
!! BUG: BAD CODE! unexpected function call foo()!
222
If I compile with debugging information (-g), I get expected behavior, which is:# cc -m64 -KPIC -g bug.c && ./a.out ; echo $?
OK: bar() called
0
While creating the test case I've also seen SIGSEGV at runtime in the bug case - which is probably due to a wrong calculated function address for jmp (just guessing).
Does anyone know if this is a known bug?
Any help is appreciated.
The rest of this posting is information about my system and Studio 12 patch level:# uname -a
SunOS v20 5.10 Generic_137112-08 i86pc i386 i86pc
# /usr/SUNWspro/bin/version
Machine hardware: i86pc
OS version: 5.10
Processor type: i386
Hardware: i86pc
The following components are installed on your system:
Sun Studio 12
Sun Studio 12 C Compiler
Sun Studio 12 C++ Compiler
Sun Studio 12 Tools.h++ 7.1
Sun Studio 12 C++ Standard 64-bit Class Library
Sun Studio 12 Garbage Collector
Sun Studio 12 Fortran 95
Sun Studio 12 Debugging Tools (including dbx)
Sun Studio 12 IDE
Sun Studio 12 Debugger GUI
Sun Studio 12 Performance Analyzer (including collect, ...)
Sun Studio 12 X-Designer
Sun Studio 12 VIM editor
Sun Studio 12 XEmacs editor
Sun Studio 12 Performance Library
Sun Studio 12 LockLint
Sun Studio 12 Building Software (including dmake)
Sun Studio 12 Documentation Set
Sun Studio 12 /usr symbolic links and GNOME menu item
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/cc": Sun C 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-07 2008/10/07
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/CC": Sun C++ 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124864-08 2008/10/16
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/f90": Sun Fortran 95 8.3 SunOS_i386 Patch 127002-04 2008/04/16
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/dbx": Sun Dbx Debugger 7.6 SunOS_i386 Patch 124873-06 2008/08/20
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/analyzer": Sun Analyzer 7.6 SunOS_i386 Patch 126996-04 2008/09/03
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/dmake": Sun Distributed Make 7.8 SunOS_i386 Patch 126504-01 2007/07/19I'm watching Bug ID: [6774287|http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6774287] for quite a while and it seems to be fixed some time ago (State: 8-Fix Available, bug). Does anybody know if the fix made it in some officially available SunStudio 12 C compiler (backend) patch already? I'm using this SS12 patch-level meanwhile:
# /usr/SUNWspro/bin/version
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/cc": Sun C 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-08 2008/11/25
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/CC": Sun C++ 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124864-09 2008/12/16
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/f90": Sun Fortran 95 8.3 SunOS_i386 Patch 127002-05 2008/10/21
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/dbx": Sun Dbx Debugger 7.6 SunOS_i386 Patch 124873-06 2008/08/20
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/analyzer": Sun Analyzer 7.6 SunOS_i386 Patch 126996-04 2008/09/03
version of "/usr/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/../../bin/dmake": Sun Distributed Make 7.8 SunOS_i386 Patch 126504-01 2007/07/19 -
Hi-
Looked thru the thread related to my questions and found nothing that applies yet.
Example:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/4e4472b9-8e6f-4fdc-a287-1cc8c0f6de09/windows-2008-r2-backup-fails-with-event-521-error-code-2155348001?forum=windowsbackup
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/e8c910f7-f0dd-4613-beae-b98894fb6f23/windows-server-2008-std-backup-fails-constantly-with-error-code-2155348001?forum=windowsbackup
Here are details of the issues....
Backup - OS error - system image:
External disk - USB
Mon - Fri @ 6PM.
Windows SystemState
OS(C:)
Last backup failure...
Start time: 8/11/2014 6:01:32 PM
End time: 8/12/2014 4:51:29 AM
Duration: 10:49:56.4414784
[Critical error WINIMAGE_UNABLE_VSS] Unable to create VSS snapshot
- Additional information: Refer to the log for more details
- Troubleshooting link:
http://kb.backupassist.com/errormap.php?BA2512
The backup operation stopped before completing.
Detailed error: ERROR - The shared restore point operation failed with error (0x81000101)
The creation of a shadow copy has timed out. Try this operation again.
Log of files successfully backed up:
C:\Windows\Logs\WindowsServerBackup\Backup-12-08-2014_04-41-00.log
Log of files for which backup failed:
C:\Windows\Logs\WindowsServerBackup\Backup_Error-12-08-2014_04-41-00.log
NOTE:
The errors logs are not there?
Windows Backup timed-out before the shared protection point was created.
ERROR - The shared restore point operation failed with error (0x81000101)
The creation of a shadow copy has timed out. Try this operation again.
Event Viewer Log:
Sequence of Events...
1.
The Block Level Backup Engine service has successfully started.
2.
Backup operation that started...
Log Name: Application
Source: Microsoft-Windows-Backup
Date: 8/12/2014 4:51:06 AM
Event ID: 521
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords:
User: SYSTEM
Computer: mdnfile.Auxiant.local
Description:
The backup operation that started at '?2014?-?08?-?12T09:41:00.492000000Z' has failed because the
Volume Shadow Copy Service operation to create a shadow copy of the volumes being backed up failed
with following error code '2155348001'.
Please review the event details for a solution, and then rerun the backup operation once the issue is resolved.
--> Suggestion are to check Virus scanner or consult DPM forum...
3.
OS Job failed with errors...( Backup Assist is 3rd party backup - wrapper round Wbadmin/Win Backup)
Log Name: Application
Source: BackupAssist
Date: 8/12/2014 4:51:51 AM
Event ID: 5634
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: mdnfile.Auxiant.local
Description:
Backup job OS backup failed with errors.
Critical error: Unable to create VSS snapshot
Destination: External disk
Start time: 8/11/2014 6:01:32 PM
End time: 8/12/2014 4:51:29 AM
Duration: 10:49:56.4414784
Destination: External disk
Start time: 8/11/2014 6:01:32 PM
End time: 8/12/2014 4:51:29 AM
Duration: 10:49:56.4414784
4.
Backup Assist reports via Win backup - Snapshot in progress
Log Name: Application
Source: BackupAssist
Date: 8/12/2014 4:52:20 AM
Event ID: 5634
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: mdnfile.Auxiant.local
Description:
Backup job Data backup failed with errors.
Ultra critical error: Volume Shadow Copy Error 0x80042316 - snapshot set in progress
Destination: Local directory
Start time: 8/12/2014 4:52:10 AM
End time: 8/12/2014 4:52:12 AM
Duration: 00:00:02.7300000
5.
The Block Level Backup Engine service has stopped.
6.
Later...we tried manually stopping VSS and SWPRV services - only VSS had the issue.
WBengine was not running...
C:\>sc stop swprv
SERVICE_NAME: swprv
TYPE : 10 WIN32_OWN_PROCESS
STATE : 3 STOP_PENDING
(STOPPABLE, NOT_PAUSABLE, ACCEPTS_SHUTDOWN)
WIN32_EXIT_CODE : 0 (0x0)
SERVICE_EXIT_CODE : 0 (0x0)
CHECKPOINT : 0x0
WAIT_HINT : 0x0
C:\>sc query swprv
SERVICE_NAME: swprv
TYPE : 10 WIN32_OWN_PROCESS
STATE : 1 STOPPED
WIN32_EXIT_CODE : 0 (0x0)
SERVICE_EXIT_CODE : 0 (0x0)
CHECKPOINT : 0x0
WAIT_HINT : 0x0
C:\>sc query wbengine
SERVICE_NAME: wbengine
TYPE : 10 WIN32_OWN_PROCESS
STATE : 1 STOPPED
WIN32_EXIT_CODE : 0 (0x0)
SERVICE_EXIT_CODE : 0 (0x0)
CHECKPOINT : 0x0
WAIT_HINT : 0x0
C:\>sc query vss
SERVICE_NAME: vss
TYPE : 10 WIN32_OWN_PROCESS
STATE : 3 STOP_PENDING
(STOPPABLE, NOT_PAUSABLE, ACCEPTS_SHUTDOWN)
WIN32_EXIT_CODE : 0 (0x0)
SERVICE_EXIT_CODE : 0 (0x0)
CHECKPOINT : 0x0
WAIT_HINT : 0x0
C:\>sc stop vss
[SC] ControlService FAILED 1061:
The service cannot accept control messages at this time.
Log Name: Application
Source: VSS
Date: 8/12/2014 9:20:33 AM
Event ID: 8225
Task Category: None
Level: Information
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: mdnfile.Auxiant.local
Description:
The VSS service is shutting down due to shutdown event from the Service Control Manager.
7.
VSS still having issues here...not stopping!
Log Name: Application
Source: VSS
Date: 8/12/2014 9:42:33 AM
Event ID: 11
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: mdnfile.Auxiant.local
Description:
Volume Shadow Copy Service information:
The COM Server with CLSID {e579ab5f-1cc4-44b4-bed9-de0991ff0623} and name IVssCoordinatorEx2 cannot be started.
Most likely the CPU is under heavy load. [0x80080005, Server execution failed]
8.
Not sure why this is started again?
Plus a DCOM timeout...
Log Name: Application
Source: Microsoft-Windows-Backup
Date: 8/12/2014 9:31:13 AM
Event ID: 753
Task Category: None
Level: Information
Keywords:
User: SYSTEM
Computer: mdnfile.Auxiant.local
Description:
The Block Level Backup Engine service has successfully started.
Event Xml:
Log Name: System
Source: Microsoft-Windows-DistributedCOM
Date: 8/12/2014 9:31:43 AM
Event ID: 10010
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: mdnfile.Auxiant.local
Description:
The server {E579AB5F-1CC4-44B4-BED9-DE0991FF0623} did not register with DCOM within the required timeout.
9.
Lots more errors about VSS...repeating Event ID's 11 and 8193...
Log Name: Application
Source: VSS
Date: 8/12/2014 9:42:33 AM
Event ID: 8193
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: mdnfile.Auxiant.local
Description:
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Unexpected error calling routine CoCreateInstance.
hr = 0x80080005, Server execution failed
. Operation:
Instantiating VSS server
10.
Then, finally stopping again...
Log Name: Application
Source: Microsoft-Windows-Backup
Date: 8/12/2014 9:51:13 AM
Event ID: 754
Task Category: None
Level: Information
Keywords:
User: SYSTEM
Computer: mdnfile.Auxiant.local
Description:
The Block Level Backup Engine service has stopped.
11.
And still repeating 11 & 8193 at this point...as we write up this post.
12.
This was suggested by the Backup Assist - software vendor....
A.)
...for 0x81080101:
"ERROR - The shared restore point operation failed with error (0x81000101)
The creation of a shadow copy has timed out. Try again this operation."
If you receive the above error in your report, we have recently found a registry key which
contains the timeout value set by Microsoft for VSS and found that you can edit this to extend it.
To get to the registry key, open Regedit (Start > Run > Regedit) and browse to:
"HKLM\Software\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\CurrentVersion\\SPP\\CreateTimeout".
Change value to 1200000 (2*10*60*1000 = 20 mins).
The default for the timeout period is 10 mins so hopefully doubling this will give enough time to
complete the snapshot.
If this isn't present, you'll need to manually enter the registry key. It's a DWORD 32-bit key.
--> NOTE: HAve not done this yet.
B.)
And for 0x80080005...
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/870655/en-gb
Our server does have high CPU load at times...
13.
Another post from technet mentions system volume size - here is our layout below:
A.)
OS/system Disk...
DISKPART> list disk
Disk ### Status Size Free Dyn Gpt
Disk 0 Online 278 GB 0 B (System Vol = C: Drive - OS w/ Programs and batch jobs)
Disk 1 Online 2791 GB 0 B * (Data drive - DFS, rsync,etc. run on D: Drive)
Disk 2 Online 1863 GB 0 B (USB 2/3.0 - Enclosure w/ SATA disk = 2GB formatted w/ NTFS.)
DISKPART> detail disk
DELL PERC H710P SCSI Disk Device
Disk ID: CA0DEEA5
Type : RAID
Status : Online
Path : 1
Target : 0
LUN ID : 0
Location Path : PCIROOT(0)#PCI(0100)#PCI(0000)#RAID(P01T00L00)
Current Read-only State : No
Read-only : No
Boot Disk : Yes
Pagefile Disk : Yes
Hibernation File Disk : No
Crashdump Disk : Yes
Clustered Disk : No
Volume ### Ltr Label Fs Type Size Status Info
Volume 1 RECOVERY NTFS Partition 3072 MB Healthy System
Volume 2 C OS NTFS Partition 275 GB Healthy Boot
B.)
Backup disk...
ST320006 41AS USB Device
Disk ID: 801AF48C
Type : USB
Status : Online
Path : 0
Target : 0
LUN ID : 0
Location Path : UNAVAILABLE
Current Read-only State : No
Read-only : No
Boot Disk : No
Pagefile Disk : No
Hibernation File Disk : No
Crashdump Disk : No
Clustered Disk : No
Volume ### Ltr Label Fs Type Size Status Info
Volume 4 F BACKUPS NTFS Partition 1863 GB Healthy
C.)
NOTE:
Also on disk 0(system Disk) - we have a small OEM partition = 39MB and a Recovery Partition = 3GB.
D.)
Issues with WBAdmin now...
C:\>wbadmin get disks
wbadmin 1.0 - Backup command-line tool
(C) Copyright 2004 Microsoft Corp.
ERROR - A Volume Shadow Copy Service operation error has
occurred: (0x80042302)
A Volume Shadow Copy Service component encountered an unexpected error.
Check the Application event log for more information.
14.
Ran "Check-Disk" -no errors...
C:\>chkdsk
The type of the file system is NTFS.
The volume is in use by another process. Chkdsk
might report errors when no corruption is present.
Volume label is OS.
WARNING! F parameter not specified.
Running CHKDSK in read-only mode.
CHKDSK is verifying files (stage 1 of 3)...
116224 file records processed.
File verification completed.
654 large file records processed.
0 bad file records processed.
0 EA records processed.
76 reparse records processed.
CHKDSK is verifying indexes (stage 2 of 3)...
156676 index entries processed.
Index verification completed.
0 unindexed files scanned.
0 unindexed files recovered.
CHKDSK is verifying security descriptors (stage 3 of 3)...
116224 file SDs/SIDs processed.
Security descriptor verification completed.
20227 data files processed.
CHKDSK is verifying Usn Journal...
35628352 USN bytes processed.
Usn Journal verification completed.
Windows has checked the file system and found no problems.
289233919 KB total disk space.
100241492 KB in 85477 files.
57380 KB in 20228 indexes.
0 KB in bad sectors.
226627 KB in use by the system.
65536 KB occupied by the log file.
188708420 KB available on disk.
4096 bytes in each allocation unit.
72308479 total allocation units on disk.
47177105 allocation units available on disk.
15.
There are no backup error logs here - only .etl files...
C:\Windows\Logs\WindowsServerBackup\
Wbadmin.1.etl = 9:42AM on 8/12
Wbadmin.2.etl = 4:51AM on 8/12
Per windows Win troubleshooting:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee692290(WS.10).aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2009/09/16/diagnosing-failures-in-windows-server-backup-part-1-vss-spp-errors.aspx
--> Related to Windows backup and not VSS?
2155348001 - 0x80780021 - Windows Backup timed-out before the shared protection point was created.
Should we run the "FIXVSS08.BAT" script - restarts services and re-registers DLL's - does this ever help?
Will this server need a reboot since VSS is in a state and we can't even test backups?
Is there a tool we can use to debug VSS or troubleshoot or OS backups further?
MSReport/Diag, VSS debugging, or another way of helping fix our OS(SystemState/C: drive) backup issues?
Any help is greatly appreciated - thx.
-SP
Scot PichelmanHi Scot,
Sometimes a third party backup application will change the default VSS provider adding VSS writers which causes Windows Server Backup using an incorrect component in doing backup, that's why I suggest to delete it for a test. Anyway you can reinstall it
after testing.
And as you said a high-load CPU could also be the cause of the issue so you may need to first rule hardware effective out.
If issue still exists, please try the steps below as well:
1. Please check DCOM Server Process Launcher service is started.
2. If not, try to change RPC service to run as SYSTEM account. To do this please modify the following key:
Note: Backup the key before edit incase it cause any issue.
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\RpcSs\
Find "ObjectName" and change the value to LocalSystem.
Reboot to see if DCOM back to work and if Windows Server Backup starts working. If not, please provide the result if there is any new error occurs.
If DCOM still not work, please compare the content of the following key with a working server:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\OLE
Edit if there is any difference and make sure you created a backup of the key before editing.
If you have any feedback on our support, please send to [email protected] -
Large number VSS errors "The specified network resource or device is no longer available."
I have a 2 node Hyper V Cluster backed up via Veeam Off-Host Proxy. I've already logged, without answer, a thread about the Off-Host Proxy server randomly (I guess) creating new duplicate iSCSI connections.
Today I have a single VM that won't backup. On inspection through the hosting servers Application Log I see a high amount of VSS errors being logged which I believe is possibly related to the iSCSI issue being logged by the SAN.
I'm not sure how to "show" the issue without a giant wall of the events but there is like half a dozen different events being logged when whatever this is is happening. For instance as well last night 60/61 VMs backed up find, but these errors
were logged constantly while the backup ran...
The question as well is is this a Windows/VSS issue, a Veeam issue or a Equallogic issue?
Also how do I find what '\\?\Volume{06fba49e-9519-11e4-80cc-000af75dc050}\'. actually is?
In order of how they come I guess:
Log Name: Application
Source: VSS
Date: 6/01/2015 7:28:19 AM
Event ID: 8229
Task Category: None
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: HOST02.domain.private
Description:
A VSS writer has rejected an event with error 0x800423f3, The writer experienced a transient error. If the backup process is retried,
the error may not reoccur.
. Changes that the writer made to the writer components while handling the event will not be available to the requester. Check the event log for related events from the application hosting the VSS writer.
Operation:
PrepareForSnapshot Event
Context:
Execution Context: Writer
Writer Class Id: {66841cd4-6ded-4f4b-8f17-fd23f8ddc3de}
Writer Name: Microsoft Hyper-V VSS Writer
Writer Instance ID: {881f5207-f769-4b40-986a-c6bd56d8aa1e}
Command Line: C:\Windows\system32\vmms.exe
Process ID: 3268
Log Name: Application
Source: VSS
Date: 6/01/2015 7:29:31 AM
Event ID: 8193
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: HOST02.domain.private
Description:
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Unexpected error calling routine Error calling CreateFile on volume '\\?\Volume{06fba49e-9519-11e4-80cc-000af75dc050}\'. hr = 0x80070037, The specified network resource or device is no longer available.
Operation:
Check If Volume Is Supported by Provider
Context:
Execution Context: Coordinator
Provider ID: {d4689bdf-7b60-4f6e-9afb-2d13c01b12ea}
Volume Name: \\?\Volume{06fba49e-9519-11e4-80cc-000af75dc050}\
Log Name: Application
Source: EqualLogic
Date: 6/01/2015 7:29:43 AM
Event ID: 4001
Task Category: VSS
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: HOST02.domain.private
Description:
iSCSI logout error 0xEFFF0040 from target NULL.
Log Name: Application
Source: VSS
Date: 6/01/2015 7:29:43 AM
Event ID: 12293
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: HOST02.domain.private
Description:
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Error calling a routine on a Shadow Copy Provider {d4689bdf-7b60-4f6e-9afb-2d13c01b12ea}. Routine details OnLunStateChange(\\?\mpio#disk&ven_eqlogic&prod_100e-00&rev_7.0_#1&7f6ac24&0&363846433631363644434545463233334146344141353632363038303136#{53f56307-b6bf-11d0-94f2-00a0c91efb8b})
failed with error 0xefff0040 [hr = 0xefff0040].
Operation:
Notifying hardware provider to free a drive
Break with LUN mask
Delete Shadow Copies
Processing PostFinalCommitSnapshots
Executing Asynchronous Operation
Context:
Volume Name: \\?\mpio#disk&ven_eqlogic&prod_100e-00&rev_7.0_#1&7f6ac24&0&363846433631363644434545463233334146344141353632363038303136#{53f56307-b6bf-11d0-94f2-00a0c91efb8b}
Volume Name: \\?\Volume{06fba49e-9519-11e4-80cc-000af75dc050}
Snapshot ID: {3091377b-2e26-43ed-a11b-f31adbde0b1f}
Execution Context: Provider
Provider Name: Dell EqualLogic VSS HW Provider
Provider Version: 4.7.1
Provider ID: {d4689bdf-7b60-4f6e-9afb-2d13c01b12ea}
Snapshot Context: 4194336
Provider Name: Dell EqualLogic VSS HW Provider
Provider Version: 4.7.1
Provider ID: {d4689bdf-7b60-4f6e-9afb-2d13c01b12ea}
Current State: DoSnapshotSet
Log Name: Application
Source: VSS
Date: 6/01/2015 7:29:43 AM
Event ID: 12293
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: HOST02.domain.private
Description:
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Error calling a routine on a Shadow Copy Provider {d4689bdf-7b60-4f6e-9afb-2d13c01b12ea}. Routine details could not free LUN [hr = 0x8004230f, The shadow copy provider had an unexpected error while trying to process the
specified operation.
Operation:
Break with LUN mask
Delete Shadow Copies
Processing PostFinalCommitSnapshots
Executing Asynchronous Operation
Context:
Volume Name: \\?\Volume{06fba49e-9519-11e4-80cc-000af75dc050}
Snapshot ID: {3091377b-2e26-43ed-a11b-f31adbde0b1f}
Execution Context: Provider
Provider Name: Dell EqualLogic VSS HW Provider
Provider Version: 4.7.1
Provider ID: {d4689bdf-7b60-4f6e-9afb-2d13c01b12ea}
Snapshot Context: 4194336
Provider Name: Dell EqualLogic VSS HW Provider
Provider Version: 4.7.1
Provider ID: {d4689bdf-7b60-4f6e-9afb-2d13c01b12ea}
Current State: DoSnapshotSet
(Below logged 3 times)
Log Name: Application
Source: VSS
Date: 6/01/2015 7:29:49 AM
Event ID: 8193
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: HOST02.domain.private
Description:
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Unexpected error calling routine Error calling CreateFile on volume '\\?\Volume{06fba49e-9519-11e4-80cc-000af75dc050}\'. hr = 0x80070037, The specified network resource or device is no longer available.
Operation:
Check If Volume Is Supported by Provider
Context:
Execution Context: Coordinator
Provider ID: {d4689bdf-7b60-4f6e-9afb-2d13c01b12ea}
Volume Name: \\?\Volume{06fba49e-9519-11e4-80cc-000af75dc050}\This is the issue having with redundant iSCSI connections being created:
Not sure this is a Veeam issue, just that it's occurring with Veeam backup process.
We have a server configured as an Off-Host Proxy with Veeam; it connects to the SAN storage via iSCSI same as the other hosts but accesses the storage as read only.
Randomly we will get alerts from the SAN as below:
iSCSI login to target '172.16.0.50:3260, iqn.2001-05.com.equallogic:8-661fc6-e612eedc6-32600005c9254a75-arcvmstore1-2015-01-03-14:13:37.2774.1' from initiator '172.16.0.44:64108, iqn.1991-05.com.microsoft:arcbackproxy.domain.local' failed for the following reason:
Requested target not found.
On inspection of the Off-Host Proxy's iSCSI configuration additional iSCSI connections are present as inactive, with an existing connections name amended with the date at the end. For instance (and in the example error above) there will be:
iqn.2001-05.com.equallogic:8-661fc6-e612eedc6-32600005c9254a75-arcvmstore1
and
iqn.2001-05.com.equallogic:8-661fc6-e612eedc6-32600005c9254a75-arcvmstore1-2015-01-03-14:13:37.2774.1
Not really causing an issue, the backups are running OK, or any issues we have aren't related. But getting annoying getting the alerts from the SAN of the Off-Host Proxy trying to connect to an incorrect iSCSI target.
Any ideas why this is occurring?
Obvious is we delete the extra connection, which stops the alert, but the issue will reoccur within a day or two usually.
Today I found twice the alert as above and sure enough the iSCSI on the Off-Host Proxy is as below:
Maybe these redunandant connections being created is related? Maybe that's the where the "The specified network resource or device is no longer available." is coming from or something? -
I am having a problem where my VMs are rebooting while other VMs that share the same CSV are being backed up. I have provided all the information that I have gather to this point below. If I have missed anything, please let me know.
My HyperV Cluster configuration:
5 Node Cluster running 2008R2 Core DataCenter w/SP1. All updates as released by WSUS that will install on a Core installation
Each Node has 8 NICs configured as follows:
NIC1 - Management/Campus access (26.x VLAN)
NIC2 - iSCSI dedicated (22.x VLAN)
NIC3 - Live Migration (28.x VLAN)
NIC4 - Heartbeat (20.x VLAN)
NIC5 - VSwitch (26.x VLAN)
NIC6 - VSwitch (18.x VLAN)
NIC7 - VSwitch (27.x VLAN)
NIC8 - VSwitch (22.x VLAN)
Following hotfixes additional installed by MS guidance (either while build or when troubleshooting stability issue in Jan 2013)
KB2531907 - Was installed during original building of cluster
KB2705759 - Installed during troubleshooting in early Jan2013
KB2684681 - Installed during troubleshooting in early Jan2013
KB2685891 - Installed during troubleshooting in early Jan2013
KB2639032 - Installed during troubleshooting in early Jan2013
Original cluster build was two hosts with quorum drive. Initial two hosts were HST1 and HST5
Next host added was HST3, then HST6 and finally HST2.
NOTE: HST4 hardware was used in different project and HST6 will eventually become HST4
Validation of cluster comes with warning for following things:
Updates inconsistent across hosts
I have tried to manually install "missing" updates and they were not applicable
Most likely cause is different build times for each machine in cluster
HST1 and HST5 are both the same level because they were built at same time
HST3 was not rebuilt from scratch due to time constraints and it actually goes back to Pre-SP1 and has a larger list of updates that others are lacking and hence the inconsistency
HST6 was built from scratch but has more updates missing than 1 or 5 (10 missing instead of 7)
HST2 was most recently built and it has the most missing updates (15)
Storage - List Potential Cluster Disks
It says there are Persistent Reservations on all 14 of my CSV volumes and thinks they are from another cluster.
They are removed from the validation set for this reason. These iSCSI volumes/disks were all created new for
this cluster and have never been a part of any other cluster.
When I run the Cluster Validation wizard, I get a slew of Event ID 5120 from FailoverClustering. Wording of error:
Cluster Shared Volume 'Volume12' ('Cluster Disk 13') is no longer available on this node because of
'STATUS_MEDIA_WRITE_PROTECTED(c00000a2)'. All I/O will temporarily be queued until a path to the
volume is reestablished.
Under Storage and Cluster Shared VOlumes in Failover Cluster Manager, all disks show online and there is no negative effect of the errors.
Cluster Shared Volumes
We have 14 CSVs that are all iSCSI attached to all 5 hosts. They are housed on an HP P4500G2 (LeftHand) SAN.
I have limited the number of VMs to no more than 7 per CSV as per best practices documentation from HP/Lefthand
VMs in each CSV are spread out amonst all 5 hosts (as you would expect)
Backup software we use is BackupChain from BackupChain.com.
Problem we are having:
When backup kicks off for a VM, all VMs on same CSV reboot without warning. This normally happens within seconds of the backup starting
What have to done to troubleshoot this:
We have tried rebalancing our backups
Originally, I had backup jobs scheduled to kick off on Friday or Saturday evening after 9pm
2 or 3 hosts would be backing up VMs (Serially; one VM per host at a time) each night.
I changed my backup scheduled so that of my 90 VMs, only one per CSV is backing up at the same time
I mapped out my Hosts and CSVs and scheduled my backups to run on week nights where each night, there
is only one VM backed up per CSV. All VMs can be backed up over 5 nights (there are some VMs that don't
get backed up). I also staggered the start times for each Host so that only one Host would be starting
in the same timeframe. There was some overlap for Hosts that had backups that ran longer than 1 hour.
Testing this new schedule did not fix my problem. It only made it more clear. As each backup timeframe
started, whichever CSV the first VM to start was on would have all of their VMs reboot and come back up.
I then thought maybe I was overloading the network still so I decided to disable all of the scheduled backup
and run it manually. Kicking off a backup on a single VM, in most cases, will cause the reboot of common
CSV members.
Ok, maybe there is something wrong with my backup software.
Downloaded a Demo of Veeam and installed it onto my cluster.
Did a test backup of one VM and I had not problems.
Did a test backup of a second VM and I had the same problem. All VMs on same CSV rebooted
Ok, it is not my backup software. Apparently it is VSS. I have looked through various websites. The best troubleshooting
site I have found for VSS in one place it on BackupChain.com (http://backupchain.com/hyper-v-backup/Troubleshooting.html)
I have tested almost every process on there list and I will lay out results below:
1. I have rebooted HST6 and problems still persist
2. When I run VSSADMIN delete shadows /all, I have no shadows to delete on any of my 5 nodes
When I run VSSADMIN list writers, I have no error messages on any writers on any node...
3. When I check the listed registry key, I only have the build in MS VSS writer listed (I am using software VSS)
4. When I run VSSADMIN Resize ShadowStorge command, there is no shadow storage on any node
5. I have completed the registration and service cycling on HST6 as laid out here and most of the stuff "errors"
Only a few of the DLL's actually register.
6. HyperV Integration Services were reconciled when I worked with MS in early January and I have no indication of
further issue here.
7. I did not complete the step to delete the Subscriptions because, again, I have no error messages when I list writers
8. I removed the Veeam software that I had installed to test (it hadn't added any VSS Writer anyway though)
9. I can't realistically uninstall my HyperV and test VSS
10. Already have latest SPs and Updates
11. This is part of step 5 so I already did this. This seems to be a rehash of various other stratgies
I have used the VSS Troubleshooter that is part of BackupChain (Ctrl-T) and I get the following error:
ERROR: Selected writer 'Microsoft Hyper-V VSS Writer' is in failed state!
- Status: 8 (VSS_WS_FAILED_AT_PREPARE_SNAPSHOT)
- Writer Failure code: 0x800423f0 (<Unknown error code>)
- Writer ID: {66841cd4-6ded-4f4b-8f17-fd23f8ddc3de}
- Instance ID: {d55b6934-1c8d-46ab-a43f-4f997f18dc71}
VSS snapshot creation failed with result: 8000FFFF
VSS errors in event viewer. Below are representative errors I have received from various Nodes of my cluster:
I have various of the below spread out over all hosts except for HST6
Source: VolSnap, Event ID 10, The shadow copy of volume took too long to install
Source: VolSnap, Event ID 16, The shadow copies of volume x were aborted because volume y, which contains shadow copy storage for this shadow copy, wa force dismounted.
Source: VolSnap, Event ID 27, The shadow copies of volume x were aborted during detection because a critical control file could not be opened.
I only have one instance of each of these and both of the below are from HST3
Source: VSS, Event ID 12293, Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Error calling a routine on a Shadow Copy Provider {b5946137-7b9f-4925-af80-51abd60b20d5}. Routine details RevertToSnashot [hr = 0x80042302, A Volume Shadow Copy Service component encountered an
unexpected error.
Source: VSS, Event ID 8193, Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Unexpected error calling routine GetOverlappedResult. hr = 0x80070057, The parameter is incorrect.
So, basically, everything I have tried has resulted in no success towards solving this problem.
I would appreciate anything assistance that can be provided.
Thanks,
Charles J. Palmer
Wright FloodTim,
Thanks for the reply. I ran the first two commands and got this:
Name
Role Metric
Cluster Network 1
3 10000
Cluster Network 2 - HeartBeat 1 1300
Cluster Network 3 - iSCSI 0 10100
Cluster Network 4 - LiveMigration 1 1200
When you look at the properties of each network, this is how I have it configured:
Cluster Network 1 - Allow cluster network communications on this network and Allow clients to connect through this network (26.x subnet)
Cluster Network 2 - Allow cluster network communications on this network. New network added while working with Microsoft support last month. (28.x subnet)
Cluster Network 3 - Do not allow cluster network communications on this network. (22.x subnet)
Cluster Network 4 - Allow cluster network communications on this network. Existing but not configured to be used by VMs for Live Migration until MS corrected. (20.x subnet)
Should I modify my metrics further or are the current values sufficient.
I worked with an MS support rep because my cluster (once I added the 5th host) stopped being able to live migrate VMs and I had VMs host jumping on startup. It was a mess for a couple of days. They had me add the Heartbeat network as part of the solution
to my problem. There doesn't seem to be anywhere to configure a network specifically for CSV so I would assume it would use (based on my metrics above) Cluster Network 4 and then Cluster Network 2 for CSV communications and would fail back to the Cluster Network
1 if both 2 and 4 were down/inaccessible.
As to the iSCSI getting a second NIC, I would love to but management wants separation of our VMs by subnet and role and hence why I need the 4 VSwitch NICs. I would have to look at adding an additional quad port NIC to my servers and I would be having to
use half height cards for 2 of my 5 servers for that to work.
But, on that note, it doesn't appear to actually be a bandwidth issue. I can run a backup for a single VM and get nothing on the network card (It caused the reboots before any real data has even started to pass apparently) and still the problem occurs.
As to Backup Chain, I have been working with the vendor and they are telling my the issue is with VSS. They also say they support CSV as well. If you go to this page (http://backupchain.com/Hyper-V-Backup-Software.html)
they say they support CSVs. Their tech support has been very helpful but unfortunately, nothing has fixed the problem.
What is annoying is that every backup doesn't cause a problem. I have a daily backup of one of our machines that runs fine without initiating any additional reboots. But most every other backup job will trigger the VMs on the common CSV to reboot.
I understood about the updates but I had to "prove" it to the MS tech I was on the phone with and hence I brought it up. I understand on the storage as well. Why give a warning for something that is working though... I think that is just a poor indicator
that it doesn't explain that in the report.
At a loss for what else I can do,
Charles J. Palmer -
Itunes install hangs due to ringtones.xib error?
When I try to upgrade or uninstall then reinstall Itunes 7.7, I get an error statement that reads:
error writing to file C:\program files\itunes\itunes.resources\ko.lproj\ringtone.nib\objects.xib. Verify that you have access to that directory
I have Windows XP and I am the only one with an account on this computer. Any ideas?Why use the STATIC flag? Doing so overwrites the patch-in-place function
This is by design. The machines being built are on a closed network that will throw security alerts whenever unexpected network calls are made (e.g. an auto update poll).
Can you just run <installer> /s ?
As part of the troubleshooting process I have run it with all flags in all combinations, including the basic "/s". The dialog is thrown regardless.
If there's a problem, maybe you should try the offline installer?
This is the offline installer. It's not exactly offline. Quite exasperating to be honest.
brandon- -
Hi,
I'm trying to run a windows backup but it's failing with the following error.
Server specification: " Microsoft web server 2008 R2 sp1"
Error showing in backup tool: "The operation was stopped Detailed error The system writer is not found in the backup"
Error in event logs: Two events one with even 8193(total four entries) and one event with ID 517
errors: Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Unexpected error calling routine XML document is too long. hr = 0x80070018, The program issued a command but the command length is incorrect.
Volume Shadow Copy Service error: Unexpected error calling routine CreateVssExamineWriterMetadata. hr = 0x80042302, A Volume Shadow Copy Service component encountered an unexpected error.
Check the Application event log for more information.
The backup operation that started at '2014-08-23T13:00:09.593737300Z' has failed with following error code '2155347997' (The operation ended before completion.). Please review the event details for a solution, and then rerun the backup operation once
the issue is resolved.
Running "vssadmin list writes" list some writes and all of them showing "no error".
Could somebody help me on this?
Regards,
JafHi,
The system writer fails because permissions to files in the %windir%\winsxs\filemaps\ or %windir%\winsxs\temp\PendingRenames directories are incorrect.
Please refer to the article below to resolve the issue:
Backup Fails with Error Message "Writer Missing" or "Failed" or "Timed Out" or "Waiting for Completion" in VSSADMIN
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/7309.backup-fails-with-error-message-writer-missing-or-failed-or-timed-out-or-waiting-for-completion-in-vssadmin.aspx
Best Regards,
Mandy
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Configuration of EPM 11.1.2 Shared Services issue during installation
Hi, I am running into issue with configuration of Shared Services after installing EPM 11.1.2 on my machine. I am running the installation on Windows 8 and 64 Bit. All of the components that I wanted installed successfully. After that I went into the
-
I am not sure where to put this but I would like individual tones for all my email accounts
-
Error - Balancing Line Item Profit Center not filled in Line Item 007
Hi I am trying to do a transfer posting from one vendor account to another. However, system is giving an error - Balancing Line Item Profit Center not filled in line Item 001. Pls suggest. Regards Vaibhav
-
Is there a cartoon effect in Premiere Pro such as the NewBlue Cartoon Plus that I was using in Premi
Is Is there a cartoon effect in Premiere Pro such as the NewBlue Cartoon Plus that I was using in Premiere Elements 10?
-
Hi, I am using OIM 9.1. I am using AD connector and AD password sync connector. (connector version 9.0.4.1.10) i have deployed AD connector as well as AD Passwod Sync connector. In xlconfig.xml file I have specified "USR_UDF_PASSSTATUS" as the field