Statements in v$SQLAREA
I see some sqls in v$sqlarea. But when I query v$session from the hash_Value of v$sqlarea, nothing comes up. Any particular reason why that would be so?
Thank you.
R
Okay :) here you go
[1]SELECT * from v$version
BANNER
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.6.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
CORE 9.2.0.6.0 Production
TNS for HPUX: Version 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
[2] Here is from v$SQLarea
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT Substr(a.sql_text,1,20) sql_text,
Trunc(a.disk_reads/Decode(a.executions,0,1,a.executions)) reads_per_execution,
a.buffer_gets,
a.disk_reads,
a.executions,
a.sorts,
a.address,hash_value,is_obsolete
FROM v$sqlarea a where a.sql_text like 'SELECT%'
order BY 2 DESC)
WHERE rownum <= 10
Results
SQL_TEXT READS_PER_EXECUTION SORTS ADDRESS HASH_VALUE
SELECT /*+ ORDERED U 174265 11 C00000022FFEE2E8 2024820696
SELECT /*+ 168019 3 C00000021BE3E7B0 3675638738
SELECT /*+ 166238 2 C0000002224D1628 4130578616
SELECT /*+ ORDERED U 165886 C000000245E5ADA0 1735771920
[3] Now query v$session with one of the value from #2
Select * from v$session where hash_value = 2024820696
No rows returned
Hope this helps
Thanks,
R
Similar Messages
-
Missingf SQL Statements in v$sqlarea
Hi,
i´m tracing some sql statements and from time to time they disapear very quickly from the shared pool.
i´m looking into v$sqlarea and the funny thing is, i thought "all" historical statments will be copied to dba_hist_sqltext. But thery are missing there too.
Some statments are away after a couple of minutes, but the shared pool is quit large enough.
I had the same problem inside the em (10g) many (historical) statements can´t be seen after a couple of minutes.
Are some other views for that ?
Thanks
Marcoselect * from v$sgastat where name like '%free%'
shared pool ksuloi: long op free list 16
shared pool message pool freequeue 700592
shared pool kghx free lists 19008
shared pool free memory 129955780 <=========== !!!!
shared pool kglsim free obj list 204
shared pool sim kghx free lists 4
shared pool kglsim free heap list 204
large pool free memory 3458568
java pool free memory 4194304
streams pool free memory 8388608 -
Sql statements in v$sqlarea
Hi
When I get the sqls from v$sqlarea, does these sqls already executed, or currently runnıng?I suggest you check the Oracle Document,
While showing similar content, you might also note there are difference between V$SQLAREA and V$SQL view
V$SQL
V$SQL lists statistics on shared SQL area without the GROUP BY clause and contains one row for each child of the original SQL text entered. Statistics displayed in V$SQL are normally updated at the end of query execution. However, for long running queries, they are updated every 5 seconds. This makes it easy to see the impact of long running SQL statements while they are still in progress.
V$SQLAREA
V$SQLAREA lists statistics on shared SQL area and contains one row per SQL string. It provides statistics on SQL statements that are in memory, parsed, and ready for execution. -
Proving prepared statements are being reused
How can I prove that a prepared statement from a JDBC driver is being reused / pooled ?
What essentially I want to do is to have prepared statements reused to reduce hard parsing ... but I also need to prove that the statements are being reused. If I query the statement in V$SQLAREA, the column PARSE_CALLS does not seem to be distinguish between hard parse and soft parse:
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96536/ch3204.htm#1126299
I am only interested for now in proving the just ONE statement is being reused ... which mean that the number of hard parses is very low compared to the number of soft parses for that ONE statement.
Regards,
jms
Message was edited by:
jmsHi,
No, parse calls is all soft and hard parse together. What you would see, if used absolutely correctly, would be 1 hard parse per session and many executions.
But since v$sql is obviously not linked to v$session other than at the time of exection, you see the aggregated parse calls and executions for each cursor. So what you should see is parse calls go up relatively slowly to the number of exections.
However, you can see soft and hard parses using the v$sesstat and v$statname views so you can see soft and hard parses on a session by session basis, be these are again aggregated, so you can't see soft / hard counts per cursor, only the total for a session.
What I see a lot of the time is they don't get it quite right, so hard parses is low but soft parses are high, so they are still parsing when they don't need to, but at least they are binding and using shareable SQL, which is a step in the right direction.
When I say 'they', it is a generic reference to all Java/.Nyet programmers writing front end code where they just don't 'get' parsing and binding because it's just too complicated and hey, SQL Server isn't like this...!
HTH
Chris -
"latch: row cache objects" and high "VERSION_COUNT"
Hello,
we are being faced with a situation where the database spends most of it's time waiting for latches in the shared pool (as seen in the AWR report).
All statements issued by the application are using bind variables, but what we can see in V$SQL is that even though the statements are using bind variables some of them have a relatively high version_count (> 300) and many invaliadations (100 - 200) even though the tables involved are very small (some not more than 3 or 4 rows).
Here is some (hopefully enough) information about the environment
Version: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production (on RedHat EL 5)
Parameters:
cursor_bind_capture_destination memory+disk
cursor_sharing EXACT
cursor_space_for_time FALSE
filesystemio_options none
hi_shared_memory_address 0
memory_max_target 12288M
memory_target 12288M
object_cache_optimal_size 102400
open_cursors 300
optimizer_capture_sql_plan_baselines FALSE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling 2
optimizer_features_enable 11.2.0.2
optimizer_index_caching 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj 100
optimizer_mode ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging TRUE
optimizer_use_invisible_indexes FALSE
optimizer_use_pending_statistics FALSE
optimizer_use_sql_plan_baselines TRUE
plsql_optimize_level 2
session_cached_cursors 50
shared_memory_address 0The shared pool size (according to AWR) is 4,832M
The buffer cache is 3,008M
Now, my question: is a version_count of > 300 a problem (we have about 10-15 of those with a total of ~7000 statements in v$sqlarea). Those are also the statements listed in the AWR report at the top in the section "SQL ordered by Version Count" and "SQL ordered by Sharable Memory"
Is it possible that those statements are causing the the latch contention in the shared pool?
I went through https://blogs.oracle.com/optimizer/entry/why_are_there_more_cursors_in_11g_for_my_query_containing_bind_variables_1
The tables involved are fairly small and all the execution plans for each cursor are identical.
I can understand some of the invalidations that happen, because we have 7 schemas that have identical tables, but from my understanding that shouldn't cause such a high invalidation number. Or am I mistaken?
I'm not that experienced with Oracle tuning at that level, so I would appreciate any pointer on how I can find out where exactly the latch problem occurs
After flushing the shared pool, the problem seems to go away for a while. But apparently that is only fighting symptoms, not fixing the root cause of the problem.
Some of the statements in question:
SELECT * FROM QRTZ_SIMPLE_TRIGGERS WHERE TRIGGER_NAME = :1 AND TRIGGER_GROUP = :2
UPDATE QRTZ_TRIGGERS SET TRIGGER_STATE = :1 WHERE TRIGGER_NAME = :2 AND TRIGGER_GROUP = :3 AND TRIGGER_STATE = :4
UPDATE QRTZ_TRIGGERS SET TRIGGER_STATE = :1 WHERE JOB_NAME = :2 AND JOB_GROUP = :3 AND TRIGGER_STATE = :4
SELECT TRIGGER_STATE FROM QRTZ_TRIGGERS WHERE TRIGGER_NAME = :1 AND TRIGGER_GROUP = :2
UPDATE QRTZ_SIMPLE_TRIGGERS SET REPEAT_COUNT = :1, REPEAT_INTERVAL = :2, TIMES_TRIGGERED = :3 WHERE TRIGGER_NAME = :4 AND TRIGGER_GROUP = :5
DELETE FROM QRTZ_TRIGGER_LISTENERS WHERE TRIGGER_NAME = :1 AND TRIGGER_GROUP = :2So all of them are using bind variables.
I have seen that the columns used in the where clause all have histograms available. Would removing them reduce the number of invalidations?
Unfortunately I did not save the information from v$sql_shared_cursor before the shared pool was flushed, but most of the invalidations occurred in the ROLL_INVALID_MISMATCH column if that is of any help. There are some invalidations reported for AUTH_CHECK_MISMATCH and TRANSLATION_MISMATCH but to my understanding they caused by executing the statement for different schemas if I'm not mistaken.
Looking at v$latch_missed, most of the waits for parent = 'row cache objects' are for "kqrpre: find obj" and "kqreqd: reget">
In the AWR report, what does the Dictionary Cache Stats section say?
>
Here they are:
Dictionary Cache Stats
Cache Get Requests Pct Miss Scan Reqs Mod Reqs Final Usage
dc_awr_control 65 0.00 0 2 1
dc_constraints 729 33.33 0 729 1
dc_global_oids 60 23.33 0 0 31
dc_histogram_data 7,397 10.53 0 0 2,514
dc_histogram_defs 21,797 9.83 0 0 5,239
dc_object_grants 4 25.00 0 0 12
dc_objects 27,683 2.29 0 223 2,581
dc_profiles 1,842 0.00 0 0 1
dc_rollback_segments 1,634 0.00 0 0 39
dc_segments 7,335 6.94 0 360 1,679
dc_sequences 139 5.76 0 139 19
dc_table_scns 53 100.00 0 0 0
dc_tablespace_quotas 1,956 0.10 0 0 4
dc_tablespaces 17,488 0.00 0 0 11
dc_users 58,013 0.03 0 0 164
global database name 4,261 0.00 0 0 1
outstanding_alerts 54 0.00 0 0 9
sch_lj_oids 4 0.00 0 0 2
Library Cache Activity
Namespace Get Requests Pct Miss Pin Requests Pct Miss Reloads Invalidations
ACCOUNT_STATUS 3,664 0.03 0 0 0
BODY 560 2.14 2,343 0.60 0 0
CLUSTER 52 0.00 52 0.00 0 0
DBLINK 3,668 0.00 0 0 0
EDITION 1,857 0.00 3,697 0.00 0 0
INDEX 99 19.19 99 19.19 0 0
OBJECT ID 68 100.00 0 0 0
SCHEMA 2,646 0.00 0 0 0
SQL AREA 32,996 2.26 1,142,497 0.21 189 226
SQL AREA BUILD 848 62.15 0 0 0
SQL AREA STATS 860 82.09 860 82.09 0 0
TABLE/PROCEDURE 17,713 2.62 26,112 4.88 61 0
TRIGGER 1,704 2.00 6,737 0.52 1 0 -
Testing tool to monitor MDB performance
Hi All,
Can any one of you help me in identifying a tool to monitor the load/performance
of MessageDrivenBean
Thanks in advance
vijayanandto find out top most query which take more time
SELECT B.USERNAME UERNAME,A.DISK_READS READS,
A.EXECUTINS EXEC,A.DISK_READS/DECODE(A.EXECUTIONS,0,1,A.EXECUTIONS) RDS_EXEC_RATION,
A.SQL_TEXT STATEMENT
FROM V$SQLAREA A,DBA_USERS B
WHERE A.PARSING_USER_ID=B.USER_ID
AND A.DISK_READS >10000
ORDER BY A.DISK_READS DESC;
TOP MOST QUERY
SELECT * FROM
(SELEC ADDRESS,RANK() OVER(ORDER BY BEFFER_GETS DESC) AS RANK_BUFGETS
TO_CHAR(100 * RATION_TO_REPORT(BUFFER_GETS) OVER(), '999.99') PCT_BUFGETS FROM V$SQL )
WHERE RANK_BUFGETS <11 -
How to get performance statistics like OEM console 9i
Hi All Gurus,
I am having trouble getting the server load and seeing different session's statistics. As we all know, in OEM 9i java console, we were able to see the following useful columns for all the active sessions:
CPU_TIME, PGA_MEMORY, PHYSICAL_DISK READS, LOGICAL READS, etc.
But in OEM 10g java colsole, there are no such columns (I dont know why), for each session, the 10g console only gives basic info like, USER_NAME, OSUSER, MACHINE NAME, LOGON TIME, etc, but no tuning statistics.
So, I was looking the dynamic performance views to see all these information. But I am confused, there are a number of views; they are v$sql, v$sqlearea, v$sql_workarea, v$sqlstats, v$session, v$sesstat, v$open_cursors, etc.
Can somebody explain to me what are the relationships between them and exactly which ones are actually needed to produce the columns like those in OEM 9i. I am not sure does v$sql represent one sql statement or v$sqlarea?, how they are related to v$session? lot of confusions!!!! pls help. Thanks in advance.You have far more questions than can possibly be answered in a few short paragraphs.
Pick up a copy of Jonathan Lewis' book on the CBO and you will find the answers to all of these questions and many more. Also check Jonathan's website and FAQ.
You will find the link to it on the Links page of the PSOUG's website: www.psoug.org. -
Where can i get the sql execution time ?
Hi ,
I want to check for a particular execution time of an sql statement
from v$sqlarea shld i get both the cpu_time & elapsed_time ?
the no seems very huge i.e --> 12592966663 and they are in nanosecons , milliseconds or secs ??
is this the total time since it was in the library cache or the last time it ran it took 12592966663 ??
kindly adviseHi ,
But can i also check is this the cpu_time & elapsed_time for the most current execution or this is the total since it was last executed
as the nos --> 13,518,633,330 when even divided by 1000,000(micro seconds) seems abit long as well
tks & rdgs -
I do not understand a v$sqlarea statement history
Dears,
I collect a history of SQL statements from Oracle 8i server. I use a statement like
SELECT first_load_time,sql_text FROM v$sqlarea
I get these rows:
=======================================================
11:23:15 SELECT DocumentID,DocTitul, Documents.ROWID FROM Documents WHERE DocumentID IN (SELECT distinct(DocumentID) FROM StoreHistory WHERE OperationType IN (6,7) AND Status = 'A') AND Status = 'A' AND SafeLevel <= 5 ORDER BY DocTitul
=======================================================
11:23:15 SELECT DocumentID,DocTitul, Documents.ROWID FROM Documents WHERE DocumentID IN (SELECT distinct(DocumentID) FROM StoreHistory WHERE OperationType IN (:V0001,:V0002) AND Status = 'A') AND Status = 'A' AND SafeLevel <= 5 ORDER BY DocTitul
=======================================================
11:23:15 SELECT DocumentID,DocTitul, Documents.ROWID FROM Documents WHERE DocumentID IN (SELECT distinct(DocumentID) FROM StoreHistory WHERE OperationType IN (6,:V0001) AND Status = 'A') AND Status = 'A' AND SafeLevel <= 5 ORDER BY DocTitul
=======================================================
I have two questions. Why there are ":V0001" and ":V0002" variables? Can I switch off such behaviour? I need, that there will be exact queries I send to server in the v$sqlarea dynamic view.
Also, I get these rows:
=======================================================
11:22:47 SELECT COUNT(*) FROM SysRights WHERE ActionPath = 'STORE/EVID' AND Enabled = 1 AND (UserID = 19)
=======================================================
11:22:47 SELECT COUNT(*), SysRights.ROWID FROM SysRights WHERE ActionPath = 'STORE/EVID' AND Enabled = 1 AND (UserID = 19)
=======================================================
I have another question. Why there is a "SysRights.ROWID" column on the query? Original query with agregate function does not have such column, of course.
Thank you for any information,
Richard
PS: Server (8i) is running on WinNT 4.0. Client (8.0.5[??? I am not sure]) is running on Win2000. Connect string contains "Provider=MSDAORA;".Richard
:V0001 and :V0002 are bind variables or place holders. They indicate that the query comes from an application (eg Forms) that is using variables to hold values. This behaviour is very useful because it allows the database to reuse parsed queries and stored execution plans for queries with an identical structure. This is very efficient. If you were to switch off the use of bind variables then the database will have to parse and plan each query you send it, which will havw a deleterious affect on performance.
Some of this behaviour you can't override (eg the Forms stuff) but with SQL and PL/SQL you can (in 8.1.6+) by setting this parameter CURSOR_SHARING=EXACT
HTH, APC -
Oracle 8i: full sql text in v$sqlarea
I work with oracle 8i.
is there a v$... that shows the execution plan for a query.
in thev$sqlarea there isn't the full_sqltext column, and I need to know what oracle is doing now.
Message was edited by:
user596611v$sqltext_with_newlines will produce multiple rows per statement.
You'll need an inline view
select t.hash_value, t.sorts, t.executions, t.buffer_gets, t.disk_reads, tn.sql_text
from v$sqlarea t,
(select hash_value,sql_text
from v$sqltext_with_newlines
order by hash_value, piece) tn
where sn.hash_value = t.hash_value
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA -
I've found this page
[http://www.billmagee.co.uk/oracle/sqltune/080_identify.html]
in which is said:
BUFFER_GETS Cumulative total of memory blocks read for this statement
so if I want to see how many blocks a query read per execution I must do ((disk_reads+buffer_gets)/executions) as suggested from the query on the same page.
select sql_text,
executions,
to_char((((disk_reads+buffer_gets)/executions) * 8192)/1048576,
'9,999,999,990.00') as total_gets_per_exec_mb,
to_char((( disk_reads /executions) * 8192)/1048576,
'9,999,999,990.00') as disk_reads_per_exec_mb,
to_char((( buffer_gets /executions) * 8192)/1048576,
'9,999,999,990.00') as buffer_gets_per_exec_mb,
parsing_user_id
from v$sqlarea
where executions > 0
order by 6 descThis is correct?
Buffer gets refers only to the block found in the buffer cache (not loaded from disk) or to the total amount of db block on which the query works (indipendetly if they are found immediately in the buffer cache or must be read from disk) ?
Hope you can help me.
Thanks
Adriano AristarcoYes, the index is appearing on the dba_indexes table, however its state is 'UNUSABLE'.
It looks impdp takes its state from origin metadata, puts into destination, and even is not trying to rebuild it.
Of course, after running ALTER INDEX REBUILD its status was changed to VALID.
So, what's the point impdp tells about its state? It can be hundreds of unusable indexes, why it's not just rebuilding it? -
Where DML statements gets stored?
Hi,
If I fire a query, let for example an insert statement, then I expect that the query would be stored somewhere in the database. I want to know where it is stored, in which name?
Thanks
BhabaniIf you know the session SID or the Oracle user something like this should work:
SELECT S.SID, S.USERNAME, DISK_READS, SQL_TEXT
FROM V$SQLAREA, V$SESSION S
WHERE ADDRESS = S.SQL_ADDRESS
AND S.SID=<session sid>;
or
SELECT S.USERNAME, S.USERNAME, DISK_READS, SQL_TEXT
FROM V$SQLAREA, V$SESSION S
WHERE ADDRESS = S.SQL_ADDRESS
AND S.USERNAME=<oracle user>; -
How to find sql statement which generates LOCK
Hello,
In my plsql procedure i have used SELECT FOR UPDATE NO WAIT statement to avoid the current record used by another user.
Actually i want to find which sqlquery is locking the Object other than my procedure.
I can find the session id which is locking the object but i can not able to find sql text.
How to find the SQL text from particular LOCKING Session id as v$sql or v$sqltext or v$sqlarea dont have session id?
Any help can be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.It's not necessarily that easy to find the statement that was responsible for the lock.
It depends.
First of all, it depends on version.
If you're >= 10g and you're lucky and you're licensed for Diagnostic Pack, you might find it in ASH.
If the statement that's responsible for the lock is also waiting on something else or runs for long enough, then ASH will almost certainly have it.
Doug Burns has a 10-part series on the subject.
http://oracledoug.com/serendipity/index.php?/archives/1477-Diagnosing-Locking-Problems-using-ASH-Part-1.html -
How to find sql statement with Unix process pid
Hi
how to find sql statement with Unix process pid
is there any view to find that.
please if so let me know
Thanks in advancethis is how I am doing this:
oracle 7352340 7459066 0 07:47:10 - 0:00 oracleJDERED (DESCRIPTION=(LOCAL=YES)(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=beq)))
oracle 7459066 5386396 2 07:47:10 pts/1 0:01 sqlplus
select sid,serial# from v$session where process='7459066';
SID SERIAL#
2178 6067
select sql_text
from
v$sqlarea a,
v$session b
where a.hash_value = b.sql_hash_value
and b.sid = 2178
; -
Trying to find a specific SQL statement to determine its cost
If an sql statement is executed will it ALWAYS show up in the awrrpt report? (10g)
I am a developer DBA and was handed an SQL statement by the production DBA as being a problem during a specific timeframe within the past hour.
That statement does not show up in v$LongOps (although other older ones are) nor does it appear in v$sqltext and is not in the awrrpt even when I run the report for the entire day.
Any other ideas or can I safely broach the Production DBA without looking like an idiot?!!
ThanksI am not using awrrpt report but for sure if your statement has been executed it must have been in v$sqltext but maybe it did not stay very long because it has been rarely executed and replaced in the shared pool by other SQL statements that have been more executed.
You could setup a copy of your production database on a similar host and run the statement several time in single user mode to check at least its performance in single user with sql_trace=TRUE and tkprof.
If your statement is SELECT your could also execute it in your production database and check at the sametime v$sqltext and also v$sqlarea, especially for:
DISK_READS NUMBER Sum of the number of disk reads over all child cursors
BUFFER_GETS NUMBER Sum of buffer gets over all child cursors
USER_IO_WAIT_TIME NUMBER User I/O Wait Time (in microseconds)
CPU_TIME NUMBER CPU time (in microseconds) used by this cursor for parsing, executing, and fetching
ELAPSED_TIME NUMBER Elapsed time (in microseconds) used by this cursor for parsing, executing, and fetching
Maybe you are looking for
-
MacBook Pro and Apple DVI to Video Adapter
Will it work on my Mac with an ATI Radeon X1600 graphics card? http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?spart=M9267G%2FA
-
Hi, i just ditched my windows PC and ordered the new macbook black. Hard choice between that and the air but for the money the macbook was better. my question is now that i have a iphone loaded with contacts, pictures and music what steps do i need t
-
Simple bitmapdata animation example
all this bitmapdata stuff blows my mind. I wonder if anyone has a really simple example I can look at to get to grips with it. I have 10 jellybeans that I want to gradually reduce in size. DOing this as a tween or actionscript results in poor perform
-
I have been using a trial of PSE11 for a couple of weeks. I purchased a serial number and want to simply "activate" my trial and not have to do a complete reinstall. Several pages here at Adobe indicate this is possible but the instructions for how t
-
Can the process multiple pictures tool work with the divide scanned pictures tool?
A friend scanned a few dozen photo's & asked me to make them into a slide show. The problem is that the 4x6 photos were scanned onto A4 size & not put squarely onto the scanner. This means that the pictures are not only at the wrong angle but all