Storage Clauses?

I'm trying to create an index with Oracle 8.1.7 and interMedia Text on NT4.0. Here is my index creation script:
CREATE INDEX PIRS_OWNER.TEXT
ON PIRS_OWNER.PIR_TXT_NEW(TXT) INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT
PARAMETERS (' WORDLIST EBRUN.SUBSTRING_PREF
STORAGE EBRUN.OBJECT_PREF')
Here is my Storage Pref:
BEGIN ctx_ddl.set_attribute('EBRUN.OBJECT_PREF',
'I_INDEX_CLAUSE', 'tablespace pirs_index
storage (initial 50M next 25M pctincrease 0)'); ctx_ddl.
set_attribute('EBRUN.OBJECT_PREF', 'I_ROWID_INDEX_CLAUSE',
'tablespace pirs_index
storage (initial 50M next 25M pctincrease 0)'); ctx_ddl.
set_attribute('EBRUN.OBJECT_PREF', 'I_TABLE_CLAUSE', 'tablespace
pirs_index
storage (initial 50M next 25M pctincrease 0)'); ctx_ddl.
set_attribute('EBRUN.OBJECT_PREF', 'K_TABLE_CLAUSE', 'tablespace
pirs_index
storage (initial 50M next 25M pctincrease 0)'); ctx_ddl.
set_attribute('EBRUN.OBJECT_PREF', 'N_TABLE_CLAUSE', 'tablespace
pirs_index
storage (initial 50M next 25M pctincrease 0)'); ctx_ddl.
set_attribute('EBRUN.OBJECT_PREF', 'P_TABLE_CLAUSE', 'tablespace
pirs_index
storage (initial 50M next 25M pctincrease 0)'); ctx_ddl.
set_attribute('EBRUN.OBJECT_PREF', 'R_TABLE_CLAUSE', 'tablespace
pirs_index
storage (initial 50M next 25M pctincrease 0)'); END;
Datbase is approx. 3.5 million records, field I'm indexing is a varchar2 with 4000 chars. Tablespace is 1400M. After several hours of indexing, here are the errors I'm getting:
ORA-29855: error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXCREATE routine
ORA-20000: interMedia Text error
DRG-50857: max#extents(99) reached in lob segment PIRS_OWNER.SYS_LOB0000026244C00002$$
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.DRUE", line 126
ORA-06512: AT "CTXSYS.TEXTINDEXMETHODS", line 78
ORA-06512: at line 1
Tablespace does appear to be full after this. I can increase my tablespace, if that is the problem. Is there something else I should do?
This is my first try with interMedia and I didn't understand all the storage clauses. Do I need them all?
Thanks for any help!

You should increase your tablespace.
If this is your first try at interMedia/Oracle Text, I suggest building your demo/app with some few records (e.g. 1000) to learn the basics. Then you just add the rest of the records and sync the index.

Similar Messages

How to generate all index creation scripts without it's storage clause?

How to generate all index creation scripts without it's storage clause?

Execute this before running the actual dbms_metadata.get_ddl
exec dbms_metadata.set_transform_param(dbms_metadata.session_transform, 'STORAGE', FALSE);
SELECT DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL('INDEX',a.index_name) FROM USER_INDEXES A;-Anantha
Edited by: Anantha R on Sep 30, 2009 11:40 AM

Storage clause of create partition based on last storage value

Hello,
could you give some advice how could i resolve this problem ?
I have procedure which is executed by job every day, once a day, and what it does, it automaticly add new partitions on one table.
I am now strugling with how to construct statement that will place every new partition in new tablespaces.
I created 8 tablespaces named data1..data8 and for this purpose, so now i am trying to understand how can i perform check in what tablespace was last partition placed and based on that, add new partition in first next tablespace. For example, last was created in data8 tablespace, so next must be created in data1 tablespace.
How can i check that ? Anyone have some suggestions ?
I am currently going with this logic :
select tablespace_name from
(select * from user_tab_partitions where table_name='partitioned_table' order by partition_name desc)
where rownum < 2 )And with this i get the name of the last used tablespace for the last created partition, but i currently don't know how to use this info further.
Deos someone have some other idea about this ?
Edited by: user11141123 on May 7, 2009 4:01 AM
Edited by: user11141123 on May 7, 2009 4:16 AM

Yes Sean,
i would like this to do bacuse of the tablespace that are created for that purpose, for that partitioned table.
For some reason, they must be used, and by the current logic where that procedure adds new partiotions with default storage option, they can't be used
and all partitions are created in one other tablespace named data.
This is situation on production, and i created similiar test environment.
data tablespace in production will in few days propably be full and intention is to start create new partitions in this way , in those new 8 tablespaces and in some time tottaly leave current and only used tablespace and that is data tablespace.
So i would like to somehow implement storage clause on already fully functional
alter table add partition
statement inside that procedure.
Is there some way for that ? That i use that qury i wrote above , and by using that value add on existing statement for create partition storage clause with next in line tablespace ?

Storage clause for locally manged tablespace with unifom size extents

in oracle 9i PERSONAL EDITION
I HAVE CREATED A TABLESPACE TEST1 AS LOCALLY MANAGED WITH UNIFORM SIZE AS 256K.MY DB_BLOCK_SIZE IS 4K
I HAVE CREATED A TABLE XYX IN THE TEST1 TABLESPACE WITH THE STORAGE (INITIAL 52K NEXT 52K)
WHEN I QUERIED THE DBA_EXTENTS IT SHOWS THE INITAIL EXTENT AS 256 K
BUT WHEN I QUERIED THE DBA_SEGMENTS IT SHOWS THE INITAL_EXTENT AS 52K.
IS THEIR ANY SIGNIFICANCE OF SPECIFYING THE STORAGE CLAUSE IN LOCALLY MANAGED TABLESPACES.

take a example what is effect of set storage parameter in table whoes tablespace is locally manager and have uniform size
i have a tablespace whoes
[b]uniform size is 32k
but when i create a table then i set initial 128k
now when table is create it create 4 extent
of 32 each(32*4=128)
because tablespace uniform size is 32
if we give intial 256 then it create
8 extent(32*8=256)
like
create tablespace tt_check
datafile 'E:\ORACLE\SAFE_DATA\tt_check.dbf' size 10m
extent management local uniform size 32k;
create table tt_1
(no number)
tablespace tt_check
storage(initial 128k
next 128k);
1* select extent_id,segment_name,tablespace_name,bytes from dba_extents where segment_name='TT_1'
QL> /
EXTENT_ID SEGMENT_NAME TABLESPACE_NAME BYTES
0 TT_1 TT_CHECK 32768
1 TT_1 TT_CHECK 32768
2 TT_1 TT_CHECK 32768
3 TT_1 TT_CHECK 32768
hope it will help you
kuljeet pal singh

How does OMW determine storage clauses?

Hi.
I'm probably being a bit thick here, but I can't work out how OMW works out the storage clauses for segments when migrating from SQL Server 7 to Oracle 8i.
I guessed that the default storage clause on the tablespace built during the migration would be used if nothing was specified within the "Override Default Storage Options" tab in the Oracle Model...
...BUT this does not seem to be true for all segments. In a migration that I did recently, a handful of segments had different NEXT extent sizes, and I can't work out why!
Anyone know about this?
Thanks for any help offered,
Dave.

"Other" refers to system files, downloads, documents..., everything that doesn't fit on the other categories. See > http://pondini.org/OSX/LionStorage.html

Exp/imp and storage clause

Is it possible to make an export of the database with the exp tool, but without the storage clause for tables and indexes?
My develop database is 2GB big, and when i make an export without data and import it in a clean production environment without data, the datafiles are also 2GB big.
The export parameter compress=Y/N doesn't matter.
Thanks

gert-jan, your post is unclear on by 2G big you mean the physical datafile size or the amount of space allocated within the tablespaces?
If you are allowing the import to create the tablespaces then they are going to have the same size as defined in test.
The compress=y/n option should make a difference in that the default compress=y would cause a larger value be written to the export file for the initial extent.
But an important question is how were the import database target tablespaces defined: dictionary or locally managed, uniform or auto-allocate.
If the tables were created with too large of allocations I would generate alter table move commands with storage clauses to resize the objects on the target. Then I would rebuild the indexes with storage clauses to do the same. You can change the initial extent size on a move/rebuild operation.
The version of Oracle is always important because Oracle has been known to change feature behavior and parameter default values with release changes.
HTH -- Mark D Powell --

[SOLVED] Create table and storage clause

Hi, I create a table whit lob ad so, I set some LOB storage clause:
CREATE TABLE W2_T_MESSAGE_NWSL (
KEY NUMBER,
T_MESSAGE CLOB DEFAULT EMPTY_CLOB(),
T_TEXTMESSAGE CLOB DEFAULT EMPTY_CLOB(),
T_FOOTER CLOB DEFAULT EMPTY_CLOB())
LOB (T_MESSAGE)
STORE AS (TABLESPACE LOBDATA CACHE READS RETENTION ENABLE STORAGE IN ROW),
LOB (T_TEXTMESSAGE)
STORE AS (TABLESPACE LOBDATA CACHE READS RETENTION ENABLE STORAGE IN ROW),
LOB (T_FOOTER)
STORE AS (TABLESPACE LOBDATA CACHE READS RETENTION ENABLE STORAGE IN ROW);I need to export this table and do an import on a different instance.
I know for sure that the tablespace LOBDATA exists on both database but I can't say the same for the user default tablespace.
The problem is that when I import this table, the statement fail because the default tablespace of the user hasn't the same name of the tablespace where the table was exported.
IMP-00003: ORACLE error 959 encountered
ORA-00959: tablespace 'USERWNSTARTUP' does not exist
This because the create table generated by the export has this storage clause:
PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 STORAGE(
INITIAL 65536 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1) TABLESPACE USERWNSTARTUP LOGGING NOCOMPRESS LOB (B_LOGO) STORE AS (TABLESPACE "LOBDATA" ENABLE STORAGE IN ROW CHUNK 8192 PCTVERSION 10 CACHE READS STORAGE(INITIAL 65536 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1)
On other tables, where I havent defined any storage clause all works fine.
Is there a way to resolve this problem?
Thanks
Regards

if someone is interested I've found this on the official import oracle documentation:
if the tablespace no longer exists or the user does not have the necessary quota, the system uses the default tablespace for that user as long as the table is unpartitioned, contains no LOB or VARRAY columns, is not a type table, and is not an index-only table with an overflow segment.In my case I've a LOB column, so tablespace information would be exporterd. I've done a trace of the import and I can confirm that on table without lob, varray etc.. the create table statement hasn't the tablespace specification.

Generating FREELIST storage clause from Designer

Hi,
We are using Designer 6.0 to generate our tablespace and table DML. I am currently trying to get Designer to generate a CREATE TABLE command of the form (where the FREELIST GROUP clause is the subject of this question).
CREATE TABLE
test_table( id NUMBER )
TABLESPACE TEST_TBL
STORAGE (FREELIST GROUPS 2)
I know that a FREELIST GROUP can be specified at the Storage Definition level in Designer 6.0 and that these Storage Definitions can be assigned to tablespaces and tables. However, even setting it at the Storage Definition level and assigning that definition to the Table won't generate it in the DML script for the table.
Are there other options that need to be set before the FREELIST GROUPS storage clause can be generated ? - I want to avoid changing the scripts by hand.
Any help is appreciated,
Natalina

DROP TABLE t;
create table t as select * from all_objects where 1=0;
begin
dbms_metadata.set_transform_param( DBMS_METADATA.SESSION_TRANSFORM, 'SEGMENT_ATTRIBUTES', false );
dbms_metadata.set_transform_param( DBMS_METADATA.SESSION_TRANSFORM, 'SQLTERMINATOR', TRUE );
end;
SELECT REPLACE(
DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL( 'TABLE', 'T'),
'"'||USER||'".',
from dual;
CREATE TABLE "T"
   (     "OWNER" VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "OBJECT_NAME" VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "SUBOBJECT_NAME" VARCHAR2(30),
     "OBJECT_ID" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "DATA_OBJECT_ID" NUMBER,
     "OBJECT_TYPE" VARCHAR2(19),
     "CREATED" DATE NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "LAST_DDL_TIME" DATE NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "TIMESTAMP" VARCHAR2(19),
     "STATUS" VARCHAR2(7),
     "TEMPORARY" VARCHAR2(1),
     "GENERATED" VARCHAR2(1),
     "SECONDARY" VARCHAR2(1),
     "NAMESPACE" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "EDITION_NAME" VARCHAR2(30)
   ) ;To get CREATE TABLE statements for all the tables in your schema:begin
dbms_metadata.set_transform_param( DBMS_METADATA.SESSION_TRANSFORM, 'SEGMENT_ATTRIBUTES', false );
dbms_metadata.set_transform_param( DBMS_METADATA.SESSION_TRANSFORM, 'SQLTERMINATOR', TRUE );
end;
SELECT REPLACE(
EXTRACTVALUE(
    XMLTYPE(
      DBMS_XMLGEN.GETXML(
        'SELECT DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL( ''TABLE'', '''||TABLE_NAME||''' ) SCR FROM DUAL'
    , '/ROWSET/ROW/SCR'
'"'||USER||'".',
OBJECT_SCRIPT
FROM USER_TABLES;I didn't post the output ;)
Edited by: Stew Ashton on Mar 7, 2013 11:47 AM

ORA-25143: default storage clause is not compatible with allocation policy

Dears,,
While running the following command , it gave me error:
ALTER TABLESPACE USER_DATA default storage (MAXEXTENTS unlimited);
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-25143: default storage clause is not compatible with allocation policy
I tried a lot for that error and tested all possible solutions but without result.
Is there any one faced this error before?
Thanks & Best regards,,

Dear,,
As i said before in previous reply that:
I can not give a default storage clause to a local managed tablespace.
So, only i increased spaces for data files
Also,see the following . . .
SQL> ALTER TABLESPACE ts_name default storage (MAXEXTENTS 1000);
ALTER TABLESPACE ts_name default storage (MAXEXTENTS 1000)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-25143: default storage clause is not compatible with allocation policy
SQL> ALTER TABLESPACE ts_name storage (MAXEXTENTS 1000);
ALTER TABLESPACE ts_name storage (MAXEXTENTS 1000)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02142: missing or invalid ALTER TABLESPACE option
I already solved my issue by increasing spaces for data files
Thanks for support and help
Best regards,,

Storage clause

CREATE TABLE "HR"."REGIONS"
(     "REGION_ID" NUMBER CONSTRAINT "REGION_ID_NN" NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "REGION_NAME" VARCHAR2(25),
     CONSTRAINT "REG_ID_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("REGION_ID")
USING INDEX PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS
STORAGE(INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DE
FAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "USERS" ENABLE
) SEGMENT CREATION IMMEDIATE
does the segment creation immediate means, if the new user schema i want to create this table do not have tablespace user assign to it during the creation of the new user, when i run the above script, it will means even if the user did not have have this tablespace USER specify under him, i will create it now to build this table on it?
Edited by: flaskvacuum on Jan 4, 2012 9:06 PM

I'm unable to understand your question, frankly, but I know what the clause SEGMENT CREATION IMMEDIATE means:
The default in 11g is SEGMENT CREATION DEFERRED: The table will only be declared in the Data Dictionary but without allocating an extent until the first insert.
SEGMENT CREATION IMMEDIATE restores the pre-11g behavior: The CREATE TABLE command will also allocate an initial extent.
In your example, the extent will be allocated in the tablespace users.
Kind regards
Uwe Hesse
http://uhesse.wordpress.com

SQL loader and truncate drop storage clause

Hi,
I check that during load data via sqlloader like that:
LOAD DATA
TRUNCATE
INTO TABLE TEMP_TABLE
FIELDS TERMINATED BY ","
(id,
text
it use reuse storage in truncate command. Is there any way to set truncate with drop storage option?

But drop storage is the one which happens by default then You issue truncate command
From documentation
Use the TRUNCATE statement to remove all rows from a table or cluster. By default, Oracle Database also performs the following tasks:
Deallocates all space used by the removed rows except that specified by the MINEXTENTS storage parameter
Sets the NEXT storage parameter to the size of the last extent removed from the segment by the truncation process
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_10006.htm
After additional reading I found out that sqlloader uses truncate with reuse storage by default and if You need drop storage, then You have to issue this command through sqlplus. There is no way how to mention it via controlfile.
Edited by: Laura Gaigala on Mar 3, 2009 12:26 PM

Help needed in case of Storage clause

Suppose if i do the following
alter TABLE TABLE_NAME storage (buffer_pool keep);How do i un-keep it ??
Please also provide links, if possible

Please do not post same question in multiple forums.
Pinning a table into SGA
http://kr.forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=1032722&tstart=105&messageID=4115639

How to query/find storage clause info for partitioned index?

In OEM if you click on an index name, and that index is not partitioned, there is a section of the resulting web page that gives you info about the storage options (e.g. Initial Extent Size, Buffer Pool, etc) for that index under a "Storage" heading. If however, you look at this page for a partitioned index this "Storage" section doesn't seem to be there. Any ideas why?
If I can't get this info through OEM, any idea what view/table I might query to find out what storage options are configured for a partitioned index?
Thank you -- I'm probably just missing this info in OEM somewhere. . .

Not posting a version usually doesn't result in accurate replies.
the info is in dba_ind_partitions.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Storage clause : Maximum size of extent

What is the Maximum size of single extent in 10.2.0.4.0 ? is it same for smallfile and bigfile ?

Being_Andy wrote:
sir, i am not getting proper way to find the answer in the given link. Even i find it in index of documentation also but still didn't get the answer. Can you explain it?http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/limits.htm#i287876
does your mother still dress & feed you?

Truncate Table MyTable Reuse Storage

I have a table with approximately 46,000 records in it which gets truncated and re-filled once or twice per month. I have been truncating it in a procedure and was reading about the REUSE STORAGE clause which I am interested in for efficiency's sake. But I was wondering, if my newly inserted rows exceed the 46,000 by a few thousand, will I get an error and run out of space for the inserts? In other words, does it lock me into the space for the former 46,000 records and that's it? It works fine right now, and I don't want to introduce risks, but I thought to do a few little things to speed things up.

After 46,000 rows if more space is needed and your table does not reaches maximum extent allowed limit .you will not face any problem.
Thanks.

Storage Clauses?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for