Strage Performance Problems with SQL Statements....

Hi,
I have realized a strange performance collapse while changing simple things in SQL Statements...
I have build a simple Statement:
SELECT
a.AAA,
a.BBB,
a.CCC,
b.AAA
from
TABLE_A a,
TABLE_B b,
TABLE_C c
where
a.XXX=b.XXX
and c.XXX = a.XXX
and c.yyy = 'SOMETHING'
Its very fast, even with complex XSL Transformations...
After Putting a GROUP BY or DISTINCT into the statement (to surpress Dataset "Clones") it tooks around 100 times more Time then before....
I have tested the statement in a SQLPlus, it was as fast as before, but in the XMLPublisher it tooks much longer.....
Have you realizesd this Problem before?
Greetings...

PROBLEM SOLVED !
It has to be 8.1.6 across the whole environment.
null

Similar Messages

Performance problem with SQL in NT vs. Solaris

Hi, I am using the thin driver in classes12.zip. The 8.1.5 server runs on a solaris box. With the same code executing the same sql statement against the same database using the same version of JRE, Statement.execute() takes 5-10 times longer on a solaris client then a NT client. The other java code doesn't show any noticeable performance degradation. Has anyone seen this problem before? Thanks in advance.

JDK1.3.0 on NT and JDK1.2.2/JDK1.3.0Beta on Solaris (tried both jdk on solaris, pretty much the same result). The network set up is this:
1 Oracle Server (8.1.5)
1 Web Server (Alliaire JRun, running servlets, communicates with oracle server via JDBC thin driver)
a couple clients using explorer or netscape
The problem is actually the web server. When the webserver is installed on NT, a sql call (stmt.executeUpdate(sql) for example) takes say 10 seconds, the same call will take twice as long or more on Solaris. The reason why I don't think JRun solaris/NT version makes that much of a difference is that besides the JDBC calls, all the other java codes completes at about the same rate.
null

Performance problem with MERGE statement

Version : 11.1.0.7.0
I have an insert statement like following which is taking less than 2 secs to complete and inserts around 4000 rows:
INSERT INTO sch.tab1
          (c1,c2,c3)
SELECT c1,c2,c3
   FROM sch1.tab1@dblink
WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c1 FROM sch1.tab2@dblink);I wanted to change it to a MERGE statement just to avoid duplicate data. I changed it to following :
MERGE INTO sch.tab1 t1
USING (SELECT c1,c2,c3
   FROM sch1.tab1@dblink
WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c1 FROM sch1.tab2@dblink) t2
ON (t1.c1 = t2.c1)
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT (t1.c1,t1.c2,t1.c3)
VALUES (t2.c1,t2.c2,t2.c3);The MERGE statement is taking more than 2 mins (and I stopped the execution after that). I removed the WHERE clause subquery inside the subquery of the USING section and it executed in 1 sec.
If I execute the same select statement with the WHERE clause outside the MERGE statement, it takes just 1 sec to return the data.
Is there any known issue with MERGE statement while implementing using above scenario?

riedelme wrote:
Are your join columns indexed?
Yes, the join columns are indexed.
You are doing a remote query inside the merge; remote queries can slow things down. Do you have to select all thr rows from the remote table? What if you copied them locally using a materialized view?Yes, I agree that remote queries will slow things down. But the same is not happening while select, insert and pl/sql. It happens only when we are using MERGE. I have to test what happens if we use a subquery refering to a local table or materialized view. Even if it works, I think there is still a problem with MERGE in case of remote subqueries (atleast till I test local queries). I wish some one can test similar scenarios so that we can know whether it is a genuine problem or some specific problem from my side.
>
BTW, I haven't had great luck with MERGE either :(. Last time I tried to use it I found it faster to use a loop with insert/update logic.
Edited by: riedelme on Jul 28, 2009 12:12 PM:) I used the same to overcome this situation. I think MERGE needs to be still improved functionally from Oracle side. I personally feel that it is one of the robust features to grace SQL or PL/SQL.

Strange problem with SQL-Statement

Hi guys,
i encountered a strange problem trying to execute a statement
like this:
Insert Into Data Set Text = 'Exception-Type: {0} Message: {1}';
I'm using createStatement and executeUpdate.
But the message stored looks like:
Exception-Type: 0{} Message: 1{}
I'm using MySQL 3.23. if I use ODBC everthing is o.k.!?
Any suggestions
Thanks

I found a solution,
i've thought it through once again. the sql-parsing
mechanism seemed to be the right direction.
i guess the odbc mysql implementation does a sql-statement
conversion, so the string is stored correctly into the
database. the jdbc-implementation doesn't.
if i replace { with \{ it works. the backlash can be used
to masquerade some characters in mysql.
my application is database independent (or it should be)
so i wonder if this works with oracle , db2 etc.
mike

Problem with SQL Statement for Result Filtering

Dear Visual Composer Experts,
Here is another Question from me: I have a SQL Query that is working as the data service
Select AB.AgingBandID, AB.AgingBand,
Sum(Case when priority='Emergency' then '1' Else 0 End) as [Emergency],
Sum(Case when priority='Ugent' then '1' Else 0 End) as Ugent,
Sum(Case when priority='High' then '1' Else 0 End) as High,
Sum(Case when priority='Medium' then '1' Else 0 End) as Medium,
Sum(Case when priority='Low' then '1' Else 0 End) as Low
from DimAgingBand AB left outer join
(Select AgingBandID , priority , yeardesc
from vNotifications where YearDesc = (select year(getdate())-1)) as vN
on AB.AgingBandID=vN.AgingBandID
where AB.AgingBandID<>'1'
Group by AB.AgingBandID, AB.AgingBand
Order by AB.AgingBandID
That would return me a table as in the following:
     Agingband     E     U     H     M     L
     < 1week     0     0     0     0     1
     1 - 2 weeks     0     0     0     0     0
     2 - 4weeks     0     0     0     0     1
> 1month     8     2     1     1     6
Now that I would like to add some parameters to filter the result, so I modify the query and put it in the SQL Statement input port of the same data service. The query is like this:
     "Select AB.AgingBandID, AB.AgingBand,Sum(Case when priority='Emergency' then '1' Else 0 End) as [Emergency],Sum(Case when priority='Ugent' then '1' Else 0 End) as Ugent,Sum(Case when priority='High' then '1' Else 0 End) as High,Sum(Case when priority='Medium' then '1' Else 0 End) as Medium,Sum(Case when priority='Low' then '1' Else 0 End) as Low from DimAgingBand AB left outer join (Select AgingBandID , priority , yeardesc from vNotifications where YearDesc like '2009%' and Branch like '" & if(STORE@selectedBranch=='ALL', '%', STORE@selectedBranch) & "' and MainWorkCentre like '%') as vN on AB.AgingBandID=vN.AgingBandID where AB.AgingBandID<>'1' Group by AB.AgingBandID, AB.AgingBand Order by AB.AgingBandID"
However this input port query keeps giving me error as NullPointerException. I have actually specified a condition where the query will run if only STORE@selectedBranch != u2018u2019.
I have other filtering queries working but they are not as complicated query as this one. Could it be possible that query in the input port cannot handle left outer join?
Could it be anything else?
Help is very much appreciated.
Thanks & Regard,
Sarah

Hi,
Thank you very much for your replys. I've tested if the dynamic value of the condition is integer, it's OK
But if the ClassID type is not integer, it's string, I write a SQL Statement like:
"Select DBADMIN.Class.ClassName from DBADMIN.Class where DBADMIN.Class.ClassID = '1' "
or with dynamic condition:
"Select DBADMIN.Class.ClassName from DBADMIN.Class where DBADMIN.Class.ClassID = '"&@ClassID&"'"
or I write the SQL Statement for insert/update/delete data,
I always have errors.
I've tested if the dynamic value of the condition is integer, it's OK
Do you know this problem ?
Thank you very much & kindly regards,
Tweety

Problem with sql statement after migration

Hi, recently I copied a production database X to a remote location, to serve as a test upgrade database. Original is 32 bit and test database is 64 bit. After migration it turned out that one sql statement consumed much more CPU during EXECUTE phase than on production database. Explain plans are the same. Why CPU is different? How can I trace the problem?
ORIGINAL SERVER TKPROF OUTPUT:
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.12 0.33 0 0 2 0
Execute 1 542.60 2165.29 2 6 0 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 542.73 2165.62 2 6 2 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 66 (SPB)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      0 SORT UNIQUE (cr=6 pr=2 pw=0 time=719909655 us)
      0   FILTER (cr=6 pr=2 pw=0 time=719909615 us)
      2    NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=719895787 us)
      2     HASH JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=719881575 us)
      2      NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1210563833 us)
      2       NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1210549798 us)
      2        NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1210519159 us)
330261         REMOTE TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=29176788 us)
      2         REMOTE TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1177866001 us)
      2        REMOTE TAMPROPVALUES (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=30580 us)
      2       REMOTE TREPVALUELISTITEMS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=13973 us)
24542745      REMOTE TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=638116004 us)
      2     REMOTE TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=14154 us)
      2    INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_PROCES_ID (cr=6 pr=2 pw=0 time=13706 us)(object id 546934)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 INSERT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
      0   SORT (UNIQUE)
      0    FILTER
      2     NESTED LOOPS
      2      HASH JOIN
      2       NESTED LOOPS
      2        NESTED LOOPS
      2         NESTED LOOPS
330261          REMOTE OF 'TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES' (REMOTE)
                     [T6STDBY.WR]
                    SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ID","STATUS","STARTDATE"
                    FROM "DIALOG6"."TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES" "PI" WHERE
                      "STATUS"<>'A' AND "STATUS"<>'N' AND "STARTDATE">=:1-30
      2          REMOTE OF 'TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD' (REMOTE)
                     [T6STDBY.WR]
                    SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "CITEM_ID","ROOTCITEM_ID",
                    "PRODUCT_ID","CONTRACT_ID" FROM
                    "DIALOG6"."TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD" "CI" WHERE "PRODUCT_ID"=
                      934 AND "CONTRACT_ID"=:1
      2         REMOTE OF 'TAMPROPVALUES' (REMOTE) [T6STDBY.WR]
                   SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "PROPERTY_ID",
                   "VALUEOBJECT_ID","CONTRACTEDITEM_ID","DTO","ISVALID"
                   FROM "DIALOG6"."TAMPROPVALUES" "TV" WHERE "DTO" IS NULL
                   AND "ISVALID"='Y' AND "CONTRACTEDITEM_ID"=:1 AND
                     "PROPERTY_ID"=930326
      2        REMOTE OF 'TREPVALUELISTITEMS' (REMOTE) [T6STDBY.WR]
                  SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ID","NAME" FROM
                    "DIALOG6"."TREPVALUELISTITEMS" "TVL" WHERE "ID"=:1
24542745       REMOTE OF 'TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD' (REMOTE) [T6STDBY.WR]
                 SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "CITEM_ID","CONTRACT_ID" FROM
                   "DIALOG6"."TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD" "CINAD"
      2      REMOTE OF 'TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES' (REMOTE) [T6STDBY.WR]
                SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ID" FROM
                "DIALOG6"."TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES" "SYS_ALIAS_1" WHERE "ID"=
                  :1
      2     INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_PROCES_ID'
                (INDEX)
REMOTE SERVER TKPROF OUTPUT:
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.15 0.15 0 0 2 0
Execute      1   1210.69    3831.70          0          6          0           0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 1210.85 3831.85 0 6 2 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 66 (SPB)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      0 SORT UNIQUE (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=681448432 us)
      0   FILTER (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=681448397 us)
      2    NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=681448144 us)
      2     HASH JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=681443808 us)
      2      NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=168646003 us)
      2       NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=168636029 us)
      2        NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=168580989 us)
327667         REMOTE TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=9177863 us)
      2         REMOTE TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=158011360 us)
      2        REMOTE TAMPROPVALUES (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=55007 us)
      2       REMOTE TREPVALUELISTITEMS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=9947 us)
24542745      REMOTE TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=3509657414 us)
      2     REMOTE TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=4309 us)
      2    INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_PROCES_ID (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=160 us)(object id 552075)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 INSERT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
      0   SORT (UNIQUE)
      0    FILTER
      2     NESTED LOOPS
      2      HASH JOIN
      2       NESTED LOOPS
      2        NESTED LOOPS
      2         NESTED LOOPS
327667          REMOTE OF 'TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES' (REMOTE)
                     [T6STDBY.WR]
                    SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ID","STATUS","STARTDATE"
                    FROM "DIALOG6"."TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES" "PI" WHERE
                      "STATUS"<>'A' AND "STATUS"<>'N' AND "STARTDATE">=:1-30
      2          REMOTE OF 'TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD' (REMOTE)
                     [T6STDBY.WR]
                    SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "CITEM_ID","ROOTCITEM_ID",
                    "PRODUCT_ID","CONTRACT_ID" FROM
                    "DIALOG6"."TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD" "CI" WHERE "PRODUCT_ID"=
                      934 AND "CONTRACT_ID"=:1
      2         REMOTE OF 'TAMPROPVALUES' (REMOTE) [T6STDBY.WR]
                   SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "PROPERTY_ID",
                   "VALUEOBJECT_ID","CONTRACTEDITEM_ID","DTO","ISVALID"
                 FROM "DIALOG6"."TAMPROPVALUES" "TV" WHERE "DTO" IS NULL
                   AND "ISVALID"='Y' AND "CONTRACTEDITEM_ID"=:1 AND
                     "PROPERTY_ID"=930326
      2        REMOTE OF 'TREPVALUELISTITEMS' (REMOTE) [T6STDBY.WR]
                  SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ID","NAME" FROM
                    "DIALOG6"."TREPVALUELISTITEMS" "TVL" WHERE "ID"=:1
24542745       REMOTE OF 'TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD' (REMOTE) [T6STDBY.WR]
                 SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "CITEM_ID","CONTRACT_ID" FROM
                   "DIALOG6"."TAMCONTRACTEDITEMD" "CINAD"
      2      REMOTE OF 'TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES' (REMOTE) [T6STDBY.WR]
                SELECT /*+ OPAQUE_TRANSFORM */ "ID" FROM
                "DIALOG6"."TWFLPROCESSINSTANCES" "SYS_ALIAS_1" WHERE "ID"=
                  :1
      2     INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_PROCES_ID'
                (INDEX)Edited by: Przemek P on 2012-01-27 07:40
Edited by: Przemek P on 2012-01-27 07:50

Could you please edit your post and use \ tags so the output is more user friendly?
Type: \Your Code Here\It will display as:Your Code Here

Problems with SQL statement ..Urgent Help required

Hi
I have a table with something like this
::: inidicates column seperation
col1 ::: col2 ::: col3 ::: col4
ab,abc,abvfg,fghy ::: x1 ::: y1 ::: z1
ba,mkl,huji,kill ::: x2 ::: y2 ::: z2
I want to get something like this :
col1 ::: col2 ::: col3 ::: col4
ab ::: x1 ::: y1 ::: z1
abc ::: x1 ::: y1 ::: z1
abvfg ::: x1 ::: y1 ::: z1
fghy ::: x1 ::: y1 ::: z1
and so on......
Either a procedure or a single sql statement is fine..
PS: the first column can have any number of words separated with comma (,)
Please advise
Thanks in advance

create table kris (
a varchar2(200),
b varchar2(20),
c varchar2(20),
d varchar2(20));
insert into kris values('ab,abc,abvfg,fghy', 'x1','y1','z1');
insert into kris values('ba,mkl,huji,kill', 'x2','y2','z2');
select substr(','||a||',', instr(','||a||',', ',', 1, rn) +1,
     instr(','||a||',', ',', 1, rn+1) - instr(','||a||',', ',', 1, rn) -1)
     v,b,c,d
from (select length(a) - length(translate(a, '1,', '1')) +1 L,
     a, b, c, d from kris) t, (select rownum rn from cat) c
     where c.rn <= t.L
order by a, rn;
V B C D
ab x1 y1 z1
abc x1 y1 z1
abvfg x1 y1 z1
fghy x1 y1 z1
ba x2 y2 z2
mkl x2 y2 z2
huji x2 y2 z2
kill x2 y2 z2

Problem with sql statement

hi
i have a strange problem....when i run the following code with the 'if' statement commented out then it works fine. but when i have to search a particular name, say roy , then i include that if statement. but now it gives an error like no such data found.
if the return typ of result.getString(2) is a string type then i wonder what is the problem. i enclose the code below.
import java.sql.*;
import java.io.*;
public class checkDoc
     public static void main(String args[])
          String name;
          ResultSet result;
          try
               name= "roy";
               Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
               Connection con;
               con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:odbc:MyDataSource","","");
               Statement stat = con.createStatement();
               result = stat.executeQuery("Select * from Details1");
               while (result.next())
/* problem here*/
/*     if(result.getString(2).equals(name))
     */               System.out.println(result.getString(2));
          catch(Exception e)
               System.out.println("Error"+e);

thanks alot for that help...but now there is another silly problem!..
i following is perhaps the simplest code possible for insering data into an ACCESS database.(simplest possible with just one column by the name Doc_name and table name is docdetails)...but it gives the error...
"java.sql.SQLException:syntax error or in INSERT INTO statement"
someone plz help!
import java.sql.*;
public class checkDoc4
     public static void main(String args[])
          ResultSet rs;
          try
               Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
               Connection con;
               con = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:odbc:MyDataSource2","","");
Statement stat = con.createStatement();
                    stat.executeUpdate("INSERT INTO docdetails" +
     "VALUES ('ankur')");
          catch(Exception e)
               System.out.println("Error"+e);

Again the SUM and DISTINCT Problem (With SQL Statement)

Here is the actual SQL,
select
NVL(l.pr_cust_prod,'zzzzz') A,
NVL(l.pr_prod_code,'zzzzz') B,
NVL(l.pr_lot_no,'zzzzz') C,
NVL(l.db_waf_qty,'99999') lotQty,
NVL(t.db_cust_po,'zzzzz') poNum,
NVL(p.oe_po_line,'99999') poLineNum,
i.db_shpmt_no invNum,
from
db_invoice i, db_line_lot l, db_inv_item t, db_prod_line p
where
l.db_shpmt_no like 'U388%'
and i.db_invo_date > sysdate - 500
and l.pr_run_type = 'PR'
and l.db_shpmt_no = i.db_shpmt_no
and l.db_shpmt_no = t.db_shpmt_no
and l.db_item_no = t.db_item_no
and p.db_ref_numa1 = t.db_tsmc_po
and l.db_shpmt_no not in
(select distinct db_shpmt_no from ftp_cust_ship
where DB_MAST_ACCT='U388' and sys_name='SENT')
and l.pr_prod_code like '%Z_'
group by l.pr_lot_no, l.db_line_numb, l.pr_cust_prod, l.pr_prod_code,
t.db_cust_po, i.db_delv_cod2, l.db_lot_desc, i.db_shpmt_no,
p.oe_po_line
order by lotNum
the problem is that if I dont use SELECT DISTINCT at beginning
the result is like
F , LOTQTY , PONUM , POLINENUM
DP8568.00,25 ,BVI10080 ,1
DP8568.00,25 ,BVI10080 ,2
DP8568.00,25 ,BVI10080 ,1
DP8568.00,25 ,BVI10080 ,1
DP8568.00,25 ,BVI10080 ,2
DP8568.00,25 ,BVI10080 ,1
DP8568.00,25 ,BVI10080 ,1
DP8568.00,25 ,BVI10080 ,2 //pleae note the QTY and POLINENUM
Then if Add SELECT DISTINCT, the result will be
F ,LOTQTY , PONUM , POLINENUM
DP8568.00,25 ,BVI10080,1
DP8568.00,25 ,BVI10080,2
but I change the NVL(l.db_waf_qty,'99999') lotQty, statement to NVL((SUM( l.db_waf_qty)),'99999') lotQty,
this will give me the result
F ,LOTQTY, PONUM , POLINENUM
DP8568.00,75 , BVI10080 ,2
DP8568.00,125 , BVI10080 ,1
Which I excepted the result as
F ,LOTQTY, PONUM , POLINENUM
DP8568.00,25 , BVI10080 ,2
DP8568.00,25 , BVI10080 ,1
And Advise??
Thanks a lot
Jon

based on the data set you given
SQL>
SQL> With t As
2 (
3 Select 'DP8568' c1 ,0.25 c2,'BVI10080' c3,1 c4 From dual Union All
4 Select 'DP8568' ,0.25 ,'BVI10080' ,2           From dual Union All
5 Select 'DP8568' ,0.25 ,'BVI10080' ,1           From dual Union All
6 Select 'DP8568' ,0.25 ,'BVI10080' ,1           From dual Union All
7 Select 'DP8568' ,0.25 ,'BVI10080' ,2           From dual Union All
8 Select 'DP8568' ,0.25 ,'BVI10080' ,1           From dual Union All
9 Select 'DP8568' ,0.25 ,'BVI10080' ,1           From dual Union All
10 Select 'DP8568' ,0.25 ,'BVI10080' ,2           From dual
11 )
12 Select c1,
13         sum(c2) lot_qty,
14         c3,
15         c4
16 From
17 (
18    Select c1, --Sum(c2) over (Partition By c1,c4 Order By c4)
19           row_number() over (Partition By c1,c4 Order By c4) rn,
20           c2,
21           c3,
22           c4
23    From t
24 ) Where rn = 1
25 Group By c1, c3, c4;
C1        LOT_QTY C3               C4
DP8568       0.25 BVI10080          2
DP8568       0.25 BVI10080          1
SQL>

Problems with SQL statement

Here is the problem that I have .. I have a table that gets updated every 30 minutes.. and the columns are:
Day Shift MDate
The data is as follows:
wed M 09012003
wed N 09012003
thu M 09022003
thu N 09022003
I want a SQL or PL/SQL that can help me in grabbing the distinct MDate where I have the instance of both M and N in the shift.
For the above data, I want to get distinct MDates as 09012003
09022003
But here is the problem; at some point in time say in the evening.. the data looks like this
wed M 09012003
wed N 09012003
thu M 09022003
For the above data, I want to get distinct MDates as 09012003
This is because "day" column with "thu" does not have both the instances of M and N in the "shift" column
Any help in this regard is highly appreciated..
Thanks in advance

Use 'group by' and 'having':
create table ttest(Day varchar2(3), Shift varchar2(1), MDate varchar(8));
insert into ttest values('wed', 'M', '09012003');
insert into ttest values('wed', 'N', '09012003');
insert into ttest values('thu', 'M', '09022003');
insert into ttest values('thu', 'N', '09022003');
select distinct mdate from ttest group by mdate having count(1) > 1;
MDATE
09012003
09022003
delete from ttest;
insert into ttest values('wed', 'M', '09012003');
insert into ttest values('wed', 'N', '09012003');
insert into ttest values('thu', 'M', '09022003');
select distinct mdate from ttest group by mdate having count(1) > 1;
MDATE
09012003

Performance Problem with SQL Query

Hi
I have a SQL Query (say, SSS) which runs quite fast when I run it from TOAD.
But when the same query is being used as
INSERT INTO <table> VALUES <SSS>;
It is taking hours to complete.
The Original Query(OSQ) was changed to this SQL query(SSS) for Performance improvement.
The Cost has also improved quite a lot from OSQ to SSS. But when SSS runs from inside a procedure it is taking the same long hours as OSQ used to take.
Please help ASAP as it needs to get fixed.
Thanks
Arnab

SELECT SRM.ID PROJECT_ID,
SRM.UNIQUE_NAME PROJECT_CODE,
ODFP.GS_FINANCE_PROJ_CODE,
ODFP.GS_PRODUCT_CODE,
ODFP.GS_CUSTOMER,
ODFP.GS_LEGAL_ENT_REF,
ODF_PRJ_TYPE.NAME GS_PROJ_TYPE,
ODF_SRC_SYS.NAME GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,
RESM.FIRST_NAME||' '||RESM.LAST_NAME GS_PROJECT_MANAGER,
ODFP.GS_LEG_PROJ_NUM,
ODFP.GS_SUPP_DOC ,
ODFP.GS_REQUEST_ID ,
ODFP.GS_CONTRACT ,
ODFP.GS_SIEBEL_REF,
DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,PRJP.bdgt_cst_total, budg.lab_budg)LAB_BDGT,
DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,0,budg.nli_budg)NLI_BDGT,
(DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,PRJP.bdgt_cst_total, budg.lab_budg))+(DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,0,budg.nli_budg)) sum_lab_nonlab_budg,
frct.LABOUR,
frct.NON_LABOUR,
frct.LABOUR+frct.NON_LABOUR FORCAST_TOT_SUM,
gfr.code GFR_CODE,
odfp.gs_rev_recognition,
rev_rec.NAME gs_rev_recognition,
DECODE(odfp.gs_prevent_reqtxn,1,'YES','0','NO','NO'),
GS_PROGTYPE.NAME,
COMM_APPR.UNIQUE_NAME COMM_APPROVER_EIN,
COMM_APPR.FIRST_NAME||' '||COMM_APPR.LAST_NAME COMM_APPROVER_NAME,
PR_APPR.UNIQUE_NAME PR_APPROVER_EIN,
PR_APPR.FIRST_NAME||' '||PR_APPR.LAST_NAME PR_APPROVER_NAME,
ODFP.GS_BILL_BUD,
frct.FRCST_REVENUE TOTAL_FRC_REVENUE,
actuals.LABOUR_ACTUALS,
actuals.NL_ACTUALS,
-- get_wip_totalcost(prjp.prid,'L') LABOUR_ACTUALS,
-- get_wip_totalcost(prjp.prid,'M') NL_ACTUALS,
ODFP.GS_ASS_PRODUCT_CODE,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.ID GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_ID,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.UNIQUE_NAME GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_CODE,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.name GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_NAME,
DECODE( NVL(ODFP.GS_FIN_TEMPLATE,0) ,0,'NO',1,'YES') GS_FIN_TEMPLATE,
ODF_PRJ_TYPE.LOOKUP_CODE GS_PROJ_TYPE
FROM PROJECTS SRM,
J_PROJECTS PRJP,
A_PROJECT ODFP,
RESOURCES RESM,
s_gfr gfr,
RESOURCES PROJ_ACCT,
RESOURCES COMM_APPR,
RESOURCES PR_APPR,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_PROJECT_TYPE'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') ODF_PRJ_TYPE,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') ODF_SRC_SYS,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_PROG_TYPE'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS')GS_PROGTYPE,
(SELECT odf_parent_id
,SUM(gs_lab_budg) lab_budg
,SUM(gs_nl_budg) nli_budg
FROM T_CHANGES
WHERE gs_status='APPR'
GROUP BY odf_parent_id) budg,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_REV_RECOGNITION'
AND LOOKUP.ID = CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') rev_rec,
(SELECT FRCP1.project_id,
NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN srmr.resource_type=0 THEN for_val.cost ELSE NULL END),0) AS LABOUR,
NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN srmr.resource_type <> 0 THEN for_val.cost ELSE NULL END),0) AS NON_LABOUR,
NVL(SUM(for_val.revenue),0) AS FRCST_REVENUE
FROM T_PROPERTIES FRCP1,
T_DETAILS FOR_DET,
RESOURCES SRMR,
T_VALUES FOR_VAL
WHERE (FRCP1.project_id, revision) IN (SELECT project_id, MAX(revision)
FROM T_PROPERTIES FRCP
WHERE FRCP.status=2
AND FRCP.PERIOD_TYPE='SEMI_MONTHLY'
GROUP BY project_id)
AND FRCP1.PERIOD_TYPE='SEMI_MONTHLY'
AND FOR_DET.forecast_id=frcp1.id
AND SRMR.id(+)=FOR_DET.detail_id
AND FOR_VAL.currency_type='BILLING'
AND FOR_VAL.forecast_details_id=FOR_DET.ID
GROUP BY FRCP1.project_id) frct,
(SELECT srmp.id
,NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN wip.transtype='L' THEN WIPVAL.TOTALCOST ELSE NULL END),0) AS LABOUR_ACTUALS
,NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN wip.transtype='M' THEN WIPVAL.TOTALCOST ELSE NULL END),0) AS NL_ACTUALS
FROM A_WIP WIP
,om_periods biz
,P_VALUES WIPVAL
,PROJECTS SRMP
,A_PROJECT ODF
WHERE biz.period_type ='SEMI_MONTHLY'
AND TRUNC(wip.TRANSDATE) BETWEEN biz.start_date AND biz.end_date
AND WIP.TRANSNO=WIPVAL.TRANSNO
AND WIPVAL.CURRENCY_TYPE='BILLING'
AND SRMP.UNIQUE_NAME=WIP.PROJECT_CODE
AND SRMP.ID=ODF.ID
AND UPPER(ODF.partition_code)='GLOBAL'
AND UPPER(WIP.external_id) <> 'SPREADSHEET'
GROUP BY srmp.id) actuals,
RESOURCES BUD_HOLDER,
PROJECTS PROJ_TEMPLATE
WHERE SRM.ID = PRJP.PRID
AND ODFP.ID=PRJP.PRID
AND ODFP.PARTITION_CODE='GLOBAL'
AND RESM.id(+)=prjp.manager_id
AND ODFP.GS_PROJECT_TYPE = ODF_PRJ_TYPE.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM = ODF_SRC_SYS.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_prog_type = GS_PROGTYPE.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND budg.odf_parent_id(+)=SRM.ID
AND frct.project_id(+) = prjp.prid
AND ODFP.gs_risk_gfr=gfr.code(+)
AND ODFP.GS_REV_RECOGNITION=rev_rec.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_PROJ_ACCT = PROJ_ACCT.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_COMM_APPR = COMM_APPR.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_PR_APPR = PR_APPR.ID(+)
AND actuals.id(+) = prjp.prid -- Arnab
AND ODFP.GS_BUDGET_HOLDER=BUD_HOLDER.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_TEMPLATE_USED=PROJ_TEMPLATE.ID(+)
The above is OSQ with cost 45000. ... takes 1-1.5 hours through Toad
SELECT SRM.ID PROJECT_ID,
SRM.UNIQUE_NAME PROJECT_CODE,
ODFP.GS_FINANCE_PROJ_CODE,
ODFP.GS_PRODUCT_CODE,
ODFP.GS_CUSTOMER,
ODFP.GS_LEGAL_ENT_REF,
ODF_PRJ_TYPE.NAME GS_PROJ_TYPE,
ODF_SRC_SYS.NAME GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,
RESM.FIRST_NAME||' '||RESM.LAST_NAME GS_PROJECT_MANAGER,
ODFP.GS_LEG_PROJ_NUM,
ODFP.GS_SUPP_DOC ,
ODFP.GS_REQUEST_ID ,
ODFP.GS_CONTRACT ,
ODFP.GS_SIEBEL_REF,
DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,PRJP.bdgt_cst_total, budg.lab_budg)LAB_BDGT,
DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,0,budg.nli_budg)NLI_BDGT,
(DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,PRJP.bdgt_cst_total, budg.lab_budg))+(DECODE(budg.ODF_PARENT_ID,NULL,0,budg.nli_budg)) sum_lab_nonlab_budg,
frct.LABOUR,
frct.NON_LABOUR,
frct.LABOUR+frct.NON_LABOUR FORCAST_TOT_SUM,
gfr.code GFR_CODE,
odfp.gs_rev_recognition,
rev_rec.NAME gs_rev_recognition,
DECODE(odfp.gs_prevent_reqtxn,1,'YES','0','NO','NO'),
GS_PROGTYPE.NAME,
COMM_APPR.UNIQUE_NAME COMM_APPROVER_EIN,
COMM_APPR.FIRST_NAME||' '||COMM_APPR.LAST_NAME COMM_APPROVER_NAME,
PR_APPR.UNIQUE_NAME PR_APPROVER_EIN,
PR_APPR.FIRST_NAME||' '||PR_APPR.LAST_NAME PR_APPROVER_NAME,
ODFP.GS_BILL_BUD,
frct.FRCST_REVENUE TOTAL_FRC_REVENUE,
-- actuals.LABOUR_ACTUALS, -- Arnab
-- actuals.NL_ACTUALS, -- Arnab
get_wip_totalcost(prjp.prid,'L') LABOUR_ACTUALS, -- Arnab
get_wip_totalcost(prjp.prid,'M') NL_ACTUALS, -- Arnab
ODFP.GS_ASS_PRODUCT_CODE,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.ID GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_ID,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.UNIQUE_NAME GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_CODE,
PROJ_TEMPLATE.name GS_PROJ_TEMPLATE_NAME,
DECODE( NVL(ODFP.GS_FIN_TEMPLATE,0) ,0,'NO',1,'YES') GS_FIN_TEMPLATE,
ODF_PRJ_TYPE.LOOKUP_CODE GS_PROJ_TYPE
FROM PROJECTS SRM,
J_PROJECTS PRJP,
A_PROJECT ODFP,
RESOURCES RESM,
s_gfr gfr,
RESOURCES PROJ_ACCT,
RESOURCES COMM_APPR,
RESOURCES PR_APPR,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_PROJECT_TYPE'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') ODF_PRJ_TYPE,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') ODF_SRC_SYS,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_PROG_TYPE'
AND LOOKUP.ID =CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS')GS_PROGTYPE,
(SELECT odf_parent_id
,SUM(gs_lab_budg) lab_budg
,SUM(gs_nl_budg) nli_budg
FROM T_CHANGES
WHERE gs_status='APPR'
GROUP BY odf_parent_id) budg,
(SELECT CAP.NAME
,LOOKUP.LOOKUP_CODE
FROM S_NLS CAP,
N_LOOKUPS LOOKUP
WHERE LOOKUP_TYPE ='GS_REV_RECOGNITION'
AND LOOKUP.ID = CAP.PK_ID
AND CAP.LANGUAGE_CODE='en'
AND CAP.TABLE_NAME = 'CMN_LOOKUPS') rev_rec,
(SELECT FRCP1.project_id,
NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN srmr.resource_type=0 THEN for_val.cost ELSE NULL END),0) AS LABOUR,
NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN srmr.resource_type <> 0 THEN for_val.cost ELSE NULL END),0) AS NON_LABOUR,
NVL(SUM(for_val.revenue),0) AS FRCST_REVENUE
FROM T_PROPERTIES FRCP1,
T_DETAILS FOR_DET,
RESOURCES SRMR,
T_VALUES FOR_VAL
WHERE (FRCP1.project_id, revision) IN (SELECT project_id, MAX(revision)
FROM T_PROPERTIES FRCP
WHERE FRCP.status=2
AND FRCP.PERIOD_TYPE='SEMI_MONTHLY'
GROUP BY project_id)
AND FRCP1.PERIOD_TYPE='SEMI_MONTHLY'
AND FOR_DET.forecast_id=frcp1.id
AND SRMR.id(+)=FOR_DET.detail_id
AND FOR_VAL.currency_type='BILLING'
AND FOR_VAL.forecast_details_id=FOR_DET.ID
GROUP BY FRCP1.project_id) frct,
/* (SELECT srmp.id
,NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN wip.transtype='L' THEN WIPVAL.TOTALCOST ELSE NULL END),0) AS LABOUR_ACTUALS
,NVL(SUM(CASE WHEN wip.transtype='M' THEN WIPVAL.TOTALCOST ELSE NULL END),0) AS NL_ACTUALS
FROM A_WIP WIP
,om_periods biz
,P_VALUES WIPVAL
,PROJECTS SRMP
,A_PROJECT ODF
WHERE biz.period_type ='SEMI_MONTHLY'
AND TRUNC(wip.TRANSDATE) BETWEEN biz.start_date AND biz.end_date
AND WIP.TRANSNO=WIPVAL.TRANSNO
AND WIPVAL.CURRENCY_TYPE='BILLING'
AND SRMP.UNIQUE_NAME=WIP.PROJECT_CODE
AND SRMP.ID=ODF.ID
AND UPPER(ODF.partition_code)='GLOBAL'
AND UPPER(WIP.external_id) <> 'SPREADSHEET'
GROUP BY srmp.id) actuals, */ -- Arnab
RESOURCES BUD_HOLDER,
PROJECTS PROJ_TEMPLATE
WHERE SRM.ID = PRJP.PRID
AND ODFP.ID=PRJP.PRID
AND ODFP.PARTITION_CODE='GLOBAL'
AND RESM.id(+)=prjp.manager_id
AND ODFP.GS_PROJECT_TYPE = ODF_PRJ_TYPE.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_SOURCE_SYSTEM = ODF_SRC_SYS.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_prog_type = GS_PROGTYPE.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND budg.odf_parent_id(+)=SRM.ID
AND frct.project_id(+) = prjp.prid
AND ODFP.gs_risk_gfr=gfr.code(+)
AND ODFP.GS_REV_RECOGNITION=rev_rec.LOOKUP_CODE(+)
AND ODFP.GS_PROJ_ACCT = PROJ_ACCT.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_COMM_APPR = COMM_APPR.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_PR_APPR = PR_APPR.ID(+)
AND actuals.id(+) = prjp.prid Arnab
AND ODFP.GS_BUDGET_HOLDER=BUD_HOLDER.ID(+)
AND ODFP.GS_TEMPLATE_USED=PROJ_TEMPLATE.ID(+)
This one in SSS where "-- Arnab " are only changes .....
The cost of this 7000.....finishes in 1 - 1.5 min in Toad
This is used as INSERT INTO TABLE <Select Query> ... this was taking 1.5 Hours to run.
It was changed using BULK COLLECT - still its taking around 1.5 hours to run...
Thanks
Arnab

Serious performance Problems with SQL

I am running this query to a oracle 10
update ETY_MEDIASHEET set PUB_TYPE = 'REVOKED' where id in (9090,9094,9100,9106,9112,9118,9124,9130,9136,9142,9148,9154,9160,9166,9172)
I am using ejb3 with hibernate as entitymanager. However, due to performace I need to set status quickly (so that gui gets correct data), thus i have to set it "hard" in the database.
This query takes a very long time. From seconds if the list has 1-2-3 items, and to minutes if it has 50+ items
Any1 got an idea as to solve this issue? or even why it occurs?
BTW - I am no sql star.

yes, the ID has a index (as well as title).
the table holds data representing albums and albumtracks
"Column Name"     "Data Type"     "Nullable"     "Data Default"     "COLUMN ID"     "Primary Key"     "COMMENTS"
"ID"     "NUMBER(19,0)"     "No"     ""     "2"     "1"     ""
"SHEET_TYPE"     "VARCHAR2(31 Char)"     "No"     ""     "1"     ""     ""
"CRE_DATE"     "TIMESTAMP(6)"     "Yes"     ""     "3"     ""     ""
"CRE_USER"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "4"     ""     ""
"MOD_DATE"     "TIMESTAMP(6)"     "Yes"     ""     "5"     ""     ""
"MOD_USER"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "6"     ""     ""
"PUB_DATE"     "TIMESTAMP(6)"     "Yes"     ""     "7"     ""     ""
"PUB_USER"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "8"     ""     ""
"PUB_MSG"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "9"     ""     ""
"PUB_TYPE"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "10"     ""     ""
"TITLE"     "VARCHAR2(512 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "11"     ""     ""
"PUBLISHER_LINE"     "VARCHAR2(512 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "12"     ""     ""
"COPYRIGHT_LINE"     "VARCHAR2(512 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "13"     ""     ""
"RELEASE_DATE"     "TIMESTAMP(6)"     "Yes"     ""     "14"     ""     ""
"ORGRELEASE_DATE"     "TIMESTAMP(6)"     "Yes"     ""     "15"     ""     ""
"PARENTAL_ADVISORY"     "NUMBER(1,0)"     "Yes"     ""     "16"     ""     ""
"PUBLISHABLE"     "NUMBER(1,0)"     "Yes"     ""     "17"     ""     ""
"IS_FOR_SALE"     "NUMBER(1,0)"     "Yes"     ""     "18"     ""     ""
"PACKAGE_TYPE"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "19"     ""     ""
"EDITION"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "20"     ""     ""
"DURATION"     "NUMBER(10,0)"     "Yes"     ""     "21"     ""     ""
"LANGUAGE_CODE"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "22"     ""     ""
"PRODUCTION_COMPANY"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "23"     ""     ""
"OFFICIAL_SITE"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "24"     ""     ""
"RECOMMENDED_FROM"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "25"     ""     ""
"LABEL"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "26"     ""     ""
"RECORDINGCOUNTRY"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "27"     ""     ""
"VERSION"     "VARCHAR2(255 Char)"     "Yes"     ""     "28"     ""     ""
"CATALOG_ID"     "NUMBER(19,0)"     "Yes"     ""     "29"     ""     ""
"SUPPLIER_PRICECODE_ID"     "NUMBER(19,0)"     "Yes"     ""     "30"     ""     ""
"SUPPLIER_ID"     "NUMBER(19,0)"     "Yes"     ""     "31"     ""     ""
Index
"Index Name"     "Columns"     "Uniqueness"     "Status"     "Index Type"     "Temporary"     "Partitioned"     "Function Index Status"     "Join Index"
"SYS_C0025348"     "ID"     "UNIQUE"     "VALID"     "NORMAL"     "N"     "NO"     ""     "NO"
"IDX_ETY_SHEET_TITLE"     "TITLE"     "NONUNIQUE"     "VALID"     "NORMAL"     "N"     "NO"     ""     "NO"

Performance Problem in SQL Statement

Hi,
I am using a SELECT statement where the execution time is taking longer time:
SELECT MSD,IMS,BOOK_IND FROM RW_TABLE,TABLE(GET_SUD)
WHERE SERVED_MSISDN=MSD
(MSD Column is a Object type from TABLE Function TABLE(GET_SUD) and (SERVED_MSISDN is a column of the table RW_TABLE)
Any help will be needful for me
Thanks and Regards

Your query:
SELECT MSD,IMS,BOOK_IND
FROM RW_TABLE,TABLE(GET_SUD)
WHERE SERVED_MSISDN=MSDYou reference two tables - RW_TABLE and GET_SUD - yet you have no join between them. Hence Oracle is doing a CARTESIAN PRODUCT between the two data sets. As each table or data set gets bigger, so will the results, and so will the elapsed time.
You need to join the two tables together properly. Read a book on Relational Databases if you do not understand what a join is between tables, and why it is needed.
I would also guess that you lack an index on the SERVED_MSISDN column on its own, or as the leading column in an index. Instead Oracle is reading every entry in an index to find any matching rows (FAST FULL SCAN CTVA_ETL.TEMP_INDX). So again, as the tables get bigger so the FULL SCAN of the whole index will take longer too.
John
[Database Performance Blog|http://databaseperformance.blogspot.com]

Problem with SQL statement - Missing double quote in identifier

Hi
I am unable to run the following query in TOAD.
SELECT A.* FROM (SELECT VC.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER," +
               "VC.CAMPAIGN_TITLE,VC.CAMPAIGN_DESC,VC.START_DATE,VC.END_DATE,VC.CAMPAIGN_TYPE,VC.APPLICABILITY," +
               "VC.CAMPAIGN_PRIORITY FROM VM_CAMPAIGN VC WHERE VC.APPLICABILITY = 'Y' and VC.COUNTRY_CODE = ? " +
               "and VC.LANGUAGE_CODE = ? AND VC.CAMPAIGN_TYPE = ? AND SYSDATE BETWEEN VC.START_DATE AND " +
               "VC.END_DATE AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 'X' FROM VM_CAMPAIGN_VIN VCV WHERE (VCV.VIN = ? AND " +
               "VCV.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER = VC.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER))UNION SELECT VC.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER,VC.CAMPAIGN_TITLE," +
               "VC.CAMPAIGN_DESC,VCV.START_DATE,VCV.END_DATE,VC.CAMPAIGN_TYPE,VC.APPLICABILITY,VC.CAMPAIGN_PRIORITY " +
               "FROM VM_CAMPAIGN_VIN VCV ,VM_CAMPAIGN VC WHERE VCV.VIN = ? AND " +
               "VCV.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER = VC.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER AND VC.COUNTRY_CODE = ? AND VC.LANGUAGE_CODE = ? AND " +
               "VC.CAMPAIGN_TYPE = ? AND SYSDATE BETWEEN VCV.START_DATE AND VCV.END_DATE AND SYSDATE BETWEEN " +
               "VC.START_DATE AND VC.END_DATE) A ORDER BY A.CAMPAIGN_PRIORITY DESC, A.END_DATE
I am getting "Missing double quote in identifier"
I am not sure how to rectify this SQL code. Any suggestions are welcome
thanks in advance

maybe this will work.
SELECT A.*
FROM (SELECT VC.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER,
               VC.CAMPAIGN_TITLE,
               VC.CAMPAIGN_DESC,
               VC.START_DATE,
               VC.END_DATE,
               VC.CAMPAIGN_TYPE,VC.APPLICABILITY,
               VC.CAMPAIGN_PRIORITY
          FROM VM_CAMPAIGN VC
         WHERE VC.APPLICABILITY = 'Y'
           And VC.COUNTRY_CODE = '&country_code'
           And VC.LANGUAGE_CODE = '&language_code'
           AND VC.CAMPAIGN_TYPE = '&campaign_type'
           AND SYSDATE BETWEEN VC.START_DATE AND VC.END_DATE
           AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 'X'
                             FROM VM_CAMPAIGN_VIN VCV
                            WHERE (VCV.VIN = &VIN AND
                                   VCV.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER = VC.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER))
        UNION
        SELECT VC.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER,
               VC.CAMPAIGN_TITLE,
               VC.CAMPAIGN_DESC,
               VCV.START_DATE,
               VCV.END_DATE,
               VC.CAMPAIGN_TYPE,
               VC.APPLICABILITY,
               VC.CAMPAIGN_PRIORITY
          FROM VM_CAMPAIGN_VIN VCV,
               VM_CAMPAIGN VC
          WHERE VCV.VIN = &VIN
            AND VCV.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER = VC.CAMPAIGN_NUMBER
            AND VC.COUNTRY_CODE = '&country_code'
            AND VC.LANGUAGE_CODE = '&language_code'
            AND VC.CAMPAIGN_TYPE = '&campaign_type'
            AND SYSDATE BETWEEN VCV.START_DATE AND VCV.END_DATE
            AND SYSDATE BETWEEN VC.START_DATE AND VC.END_DATE) A
ORDER BY A.CAMPAIGN_PRIORITY DESC, A.END_DATE

Performance Problems with "For all Entries" and a big internal table

We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
    WHERE
    status = 'IAI200' AND
    logdat IN gs_dat AND
    ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
Thank you!

>
Matthias Weisensel wrote:
> We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
>
>
SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
>   FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
>     WHERE
>     status = 'IAI200' AND
>     logdat IN gs_dat AND
>     ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
>
> In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
> Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
>
> Thank you!
You can't expect miracles. With over a million entries in your itab any select is going to take a bit of time. Do you really need all these records in the itab? How many records is the select bringing back? I'm assuming that you have got and are using indexes on your ZEEDMT_ZMON table.
In this situation, I'd first of all try to think of another way of running the query and restricting the amount of data, but if this were not possible I'd just run it in the background and accept that it is going to take a long time.

Strage Performance Problems with SQL Statements....

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for