Strange result for idoc job

dear experts,
i encountered a strange issue about job please see the below detail.
thirst for your help. thanks very much.
background: These is a Z program which is used to generate IDOC using MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE.
                      (the idoc is used to send billing invoice info.)
                      The program also will write a result report.
                      The Job has two step: 1.call the Z program with a variant. 2.call program RSEOUT00 to delivery idoc.
The issue:     In the job spool list it show all the invoice that sent successfully.
                      In the idoc we have one field like V_TYPE.
                      The job is ok for 2 years and recently the strange stage occur, because there will be several idoc generate,
                      but in the first IDOC for every JOB, the value of V_TYPE was fix to one value (for example 'F')
                      (as the  program  logic the vaule is set wrongly.)
                      It first occured in March, and some days later it was recover automatically, but recently it occurred again,
                      about 15 days, but till now it recover again from yesterday....
So, could you provide some clew? I think it's not relevant with the program logic.

It's a bug in your code.
mm is not the month. mm is the minute... which you already know since you use it elsewhere.
Try the pattern of
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ss");

Similar Messages

  • Strange result for outer join with rownum

    I'm using rownum in join condition of left outer join query but i'm getting strange results.
    Query is:
    Select * from table1 left outer join table2 on table1.id = table2.id or rownum=1
    Data in table1 is
    id
    7
    8
    9
    Data in table2 is
    id
    10
    11
    12
    Result of above query in Oracle 9.2.0.1 is
    table1.id table2.id
    7 10
    7 11
    7 12
    8 10
    8 11
    8 12
    9 10
    9 11
    9 12
    Even if change is rownum related condition to like rownum >2 even than i'm getting same result.
    In case of inner join, the above condition gives results as required.
    Can anybody explain the result or is it a bug?

    could you please explain why you are using rownum.
    You may have a look at the following link explaining rownum and you should understand why you got this result, keep in mind that you are using an OR condition.
    http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96540/sql_elements6a.htm#4295

  • Strange result of IDoc processing in the LSMW

    Hi
    I am using MATMAS_MASS_BAPI IDoc in the LSMW to transfer material master data into client's SAP system. After IDoc processing I got green message with text that application document was successfully processed (IDoc
    status = 53). But I can't view created materials using MM03 transaction. Then, records number in the MARA table before and after launching of LSMW is equal.  What may be a reason of this situation? How to solve this problem?
    Edited by: Marat on Nov 4, 2008 5:24 PM

    Hi there
    take a look at the Idoc overview, there should be a t100 message in there if there is a data issue with the idoc BAPI load. However this could be something inconclusive such as 'Inconsistent characteristics' or suchlike. In which case you'll have to check the data and that it matches the requirement for the object

  • ResultSet returning strange results for BIGINT datatype, using rs.getLong()

    In a MySQL db I have a value of 10 for the BIGINT primary key column 'account', which is auto-incrementing.
    The result of rs.getLong("account") is:
    4.294967305E9
    Not exactly the answer I was looking for. The other column, 'phoneNum', also a BIGINT, and also using rs.getLong("phoneNum") is returning correctly.
    And ideas why?

    The number in question is 4,294,967,305. There was another thread here recently about MySQL using numbers that are just slightly above 2^32 (which is 4,294,967,296) in auto-increment columns.

  • Quality check on Business Rules gives strang result for OMS-60005

    OMS-60005 Functions used to record business rules should be labeled as:
    BR_[entity short name]###([decomposition id])_[type abbreviation]
    BR_IDE024_CEW, BR_IDE029_CEV, BR_IDE030_CEW, BR_IPF004_CEW are violations but they are valid as far as I know.

    Yes my particular issue is not like yours. However, there have been many other laptop users experiencing similar problem to yours after 3.10 kernel. Mostly it seems to be bumblebee users that experience your problem with the blank screen. We do know that nvidia have yet to make their official drivers work with kernel 3.10 and up. The drivers in the Arch repository have been patched to work with 3.10. From what I have seen, this also only seem to be affecting laptops with newer nvidia gpu's. I fear there is not much to do with this problem until nvidia give official 3.10 kernel support.
    My suggestion would be to stick with 3.9.9 kernel and the drivers that work with it, and don't upgrade those packages until nvidia has addressed these issues. If you have a look at the nvidia forums you will see quite a number of topics mentioning black screen when starting x on 3.10 kernel, and also a thread for the system dying. Reading some of the threads there may help you keep up to date on whether or not the issue seem to be solved.
    https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/board/98/

  • Batch job for IDOC processing in 64 status

    Hi experts ,
    i want to know the name of Batch job for IDOC processing in 64 status.
    I have configured the partner profiles as 'process immediatly'.
    So with this configuration whenever an idoc comes in production it gets processed immediatly and automatically.
    i want to know how they are getting processed automatically.
    is there any job which looks for these idocs(in 64 status and process immediatly flag) and process it.
    What is the trigger for thiese idocs processing???
    Please guide me
    thanks in advance
    Anit gautam

    Hi Thanks for ur reply.
    =====Upon arrival, "process immediately" should fire that process =====
    how it is getting fire?
    means is there any batch job running which looks for idoc in 64 status or is there any event which get triggered when an idoc
    comes in 64 status.
    why we use OYEB transaction???
    Regards

  • Error : Pre Settings for IDoc inbound processing are missing error

    Hi Experts,
    There is a CRM job which executes LSMW and I am facing a strange problem during the IDOC posting the error "Pre Settings for IDoc inbound processing are missing error". Can anyone please tell me how to correct this error?
    Thanks in advance.
    Madhurima.

    I'd start with the following document, with one modification. At step 12 after typing GEARAspiWDM press the Enter/Return key once prior to clicking OK. (Pressing Return adds a carriage return in the field and is important.)
    [iTunes for Windows: "Registry settings" warning when opening iTunes|http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3299]

  • Strange results with Insert statement having select query

    Hi all,
    I am facing a strange issue with Insert statement based on a select query having multiple joins.
    DB- Oracle 10g
    Following is the layout of my query -
    Insert into Table X
    Select distinct Col1, Col2, Col3, Col4, Function(Col 5) from Table A, B
    where trunc(updated_date) > = trunc(sysdate-3)
    and join conditions for A, B
    Union
    Select Col1, Col2, Col3, Col4, Function(Col 5) from Table C, D
    trunc(updated_date) > = trunc(sysdate-3)
    and join conditions for C, D
    Union
    .... till 4 unions. all tables are residing in the local Database and not having records more than 50,000.
    If I execute above insert in a DBMS job, it results into suppose 50 records where as if I execute the select query it gives 56 records.
    We observed following things-
    a) no issue with size of tablespace
    b) no error while inserting
    c) since query takes lot of time so we have not used Cursor and PLSQL block for inserting.
    d) this discrepancy in number of records happens frequently but not everytime.
    e) examined the records left out from the insert, there we couldn't find any specific pattern.
    f) there is no constraint on the table X in which we are trying to insert. Also tables A, B, C....
    I went through this thread -SQL insert with select statement having strange results but mainly users are having either DB Links or comparison of literal dates, in my case there is none.
    Can somebody explain why is the discrepancy and what is the solution for it.
    Or atleast some pointers how to proceed with the analysis.
    Edited by: Pramod Verma on Mar 5, 2013 4:59 AM
    Updated query and added more details

    >
    Since I am using Trunc() in the where clause so timing should not matter much. Also I manually ruled out records which were updated after the job run.
    >
    The first rule of troubleshooting is to not let your personal opinion get in the way of finding out what is wrong.
    Actually this code, and the process it represents, is the most likely CAUSE of the problem.
    >
    where trunc(updated_date) > = trunc(sysdate-3)
    >
    You CANNOT reliably use columns like UPDATED_DATE to select records for processing. Your process is flawed.
    The value of that column is NOT the date/time that the data was actually committed; it is the date/time that the row was populated.
    If you insert a row into a table right now, using SYSDATE (8am on 3/5/2013) and don't commit that row until April your process will NEVER see that 3/5/2013 date until April.
    Here is the more typical scenario that I see all the time.
    1. Data is inserted/updated all day long on 3/4/2013.
    2. A column, for example UPDATED_DATE is given a value of SYSDATE (3/4/2013) in a query or by a trigger on the table.
    3. The insert/update query takes place at 11:55 PM - so the SYSDATE values are for THE DAY THE QUERY BEGAN
    4. The data pull begins at 12:05 am (on 3/5/2013 - just after midnight)
    5. The transaction is COMMITTED at 12:10 AM (on 3/5/2013); 5 minutes after the data pull began.
    That data extract in step 4 will NEVER see those records! They DO NOT EXIST when the data pull query is executed since they haven't been committed.
    Even worse, the next nights data pull will not see them either! That is because the next pull will pull data for 3/5/2013 but those records have a date of 3/4/2013. They will never get processed.
    >
    Job timing is 4am and 10pm EST
    >
    Another wrinkle is when data is inserted/updated from different timezones and the UPDATED_DATE value is from the CLIENT pc or server. Then you can get even more data missed since the client dates may be hours different than the server date used for the data pull process.
    DO NOT try to use UPDATED_DATE type columns to do delta extraction or you can have this issue.

  • Strange result from insert into...select query

    Hello guys,
    I need your preciuos help for a question maybe simple, but that I can't explain by myself!
    I have a query of "insert into...select" that, as I have explained in the title, returns a strange result. In facts, If I execute ONLY the SELECT statement the query returns the expected result (so 2 rows); instead If I execute the entire statement, that is the "insert into...select", the query returns 0 rows inserted!!
    Following an example of the query:
    INSERT
    INTO TITOLI_ORI
    COD_TITOLO_RICCONS ,
    D_ESTRAZIONE ,
    COD_SOCIETA ,
    COD_PIANO_CONTABILE ,
    COD_CONTO_CONTABILE ,
    COD_RUBRICATO_STATISTICO_1 ,
    COD_NDG ,
    NUM_ESEGUITO ,
    CUR_IMPORTO_RICCONS ,
    CUR_IMPORTO_BICO ,
    FLG_MODIFICATO ,
    CUR_NON_ASSEGNATO ,
    FLG_QUOTATO ,
    COD_CATEG ,
    TIP_COPERTURA ,
    TIPTAS_TITOLO
    SELECT NEWID,
    '28-feb-2111',
    COD_SOCIETA,
    COD_PIANO_CONTABILE,
    COD_CONTO_CONTABILE,
    COD_RUBRICATO_STATISTICO_1,
    COD_NDG,
    NUM_ESEGUITO,
    CUR_VAL_IMPEGNI,
    'ABC' as CUR_IMPORTO_BICO,
    0 as FLG_MODIFICATO,
    NULL as CUR_NON_ASSEGNATO,
    FLG_QUOTATO,
    COD_CATEG,
    TIP_COPERTURA,
    TIP_TASSO
    FROM
    (SELECT S.COD_SOC AS COD_SOCIETA,
    S.TIP_PIANO_CNTB AS COD_PIANO_CONTABILE,
    S.COD_CONTO_CNTB AS COD_CONTO_CONTABILE,
    S.COD_RUBR_STAT AS COD_RUBRICATO_STATISTICO_1,
    TRC.COD_RAGGR_IAS AS COD_RAGGRUPPAMENTO_IAS,
    TRC.COD_NDG AS COD_NDG,
    TRC.COD_ESEG AS NUM_ESEGUITO,
    CAST((TRC.IMP_PLUS_MINUS_VAL/TRC.IMP_CAMB) AS FLOAT) AS CUR_VAL_IMPEGNI,
    TRC.TIP_QUOTAZ AS FLG_QUOTATO,
    TRC.COD_CAT_TIT AS COD_CATEG,
    TIP_COP AS TIP_COPERTURA,
    T.TIP_TASSO AS TIP_TASSO
    FROM S_SLD_CNTB S
    INNER JOIN
    (SELECT DISTINCT COD_SOC,
    TIP_PIANO_CNTB,
    COD_CONTO_CNTB,
    COD_RUBR_STAT ,
    COD_INTER_TIT AS COD_INTER
    FROM S_COLLEG_CONTO_CNTB_TIT
    WHERE COD_SOC = 'ME'
    ) CCC
    ON S.COD_SOC = CCC.COD_SOC
    AND S.TIP_PIANO_CNTB = CCC.TIP_PIANO_CNTB
    AND S.COD_CONTO_CNTB = CCC.COD_CONTO_CNTB
    AND S.COD_RUBR_STAT = CCC.COD_RUBR_STAT
    INNER JOIN S_TIT_RICCONS TRC
    ON CCC.COD_INTER = TRC.COD_INTER_TIT
    AND CCC.COD_SOC = TRC.COD_SOC
    AND TRC.COD_RAGGR_IAS = RTRIM('VALUE1 ')
    AND TRC.COD_RAGGR_IAS NOT IN ('VALUE2')
    AND TRC.DES_TIP_SLD_TIT_RICCONS IN ('VALUE3')
    AND TRC.DES_MOV_TIT = RTRIM('VALUE4 ')
    AND TRC.COD_CAT_TIT = RTRIM('VALUE4 ')
    AND TRC.COD_INTER_TIT = RTRIM('VALUE5')
    AND '28-feb-2011' = TRC.DAT_RIF
    LEFT JOIN S_TIT T
    ON T.COD_INTER_TIT = TRC.COD_INTER_TIT
    AND T.COD_SOC = TRC.COD_SOC
    AND '28-feb-2011' = T.DAT_RIF
    INNER JOIN S_ANAG_SOGG AG
    ON TRC.COD_NDG = AG.COD_NDG
    AND AG.COD_SOC = TRC.COD_SOC
    AND '28-feb-2011' = AG.DAT_RIF
    WHERE S.DAT_RIF = '28-feb-2011'
    AND (S.FLG_ANULL_BICO = 0
    OR S.FLG_ANULL_BICO IS NULL)
    AND S.COD_SOC = 'V6'
    AND LENGTH(RTRIM(S.COD_CONTO_CNTB)) = 10
    AND S.TIP_PIANO_CNTB = 'V7'
    AND TRC.IMP_PLUS_MINUS_VAL < 0
    AND SUBSTR(S.COD_CONTO_CNTB,1,7) IN (RTRIM('VALUE8 '))
    Thanks a lot

    Right, I have executed this steps:
    - I have changed the query with the select count(*)
    - Changed the insert into with the select count(*)
    - Executed the insert into
    These are the result:
    SQL> select count(*) from TITOLI_ORI2;
    COUNT(*)
    1
    BUT:
    SQL> select * from TITOLI_ORI2;
    A
    0
    The insert into that I've modified is this:
    INSERT INTO bsc.TITOLI_ORI2
    select count(*)
    FROM
    (SELECT bsc.NEWID,
    TO_DATE('28-feb-2111','DD-MON-YYYY') as data,
    COD_SOCIETA,
    COD_PIANO_CONTABILE,
    COD_CONTO_CONTABILE,
    COD_RUBRICATO_STATISTICO_1,
    COD_NDG,
    NUM_ESEGUITO,
    CUR_VAL_IMPEGNI,
    'ABC' AS CUR_IMPORTO_BICO,
    0 AS FLG_MODIFICATO,
    NULL CUR_NON_ASSEGNATO,
    FLG_QUOTATO,
    COD_CATEG,
    TIP_COPERTURA,
    TIP_TASSO
    FROM
    (SELECT S.COD_SOC AS COD_SOCIETA,
    S.TIP_PIANO_CNTB AS COD_PIANO_CONTABILE,
    S.COD_CONTO_CNTB AS COD_CONTO_CONTABILE,
    S.COD_RUBR_STAT AS COD_RUBRICATO_STATISTICO_1,
    TRC.COD_RAGGR_IAS AS COD_RAGGRUPPAMENTO_IAS,
    TRC.COD_NDG AS COD_NDG,
    TRC.COD_ESEG AS NUM_ESEGUITO,
    CAST((TRC.IMP_PLUS_MINUS_VAL/TRC.IMP_CAMB) AS FLOAT) AS CUR_VAL_IMPEGNI,
    TRC.TIP_QUOTAZ AS FLG_QUOTATO,
    TRC.COD_CAT_TIT AS COD_CATEG,
    TIP_COP AS TIP_COPERTURA,
    T.TIP_TASSO AS TIP_TASSO
    FROM bsc.S_SLD_CNTB S
    INNER JOIN
    (SELECT DISTINCT COD_SOC,
    TIP_PIANO_CNTB,
    COD_CONTO_CNTB,
    COD_RUBR_STAT ,
    COD_INTER_TIT AS COD_INTER
    FROM bsc.S_COLLEG_CONTO_CNTB_TIT
    WHERE COD_SOC = 'ME'
    ) CCC
    ON S.COD_SOC = CCC.COD_SOC
    AND S.TIP_PIANO_CNTB = CCC.TIP_PIANO_CNTB
    AND S.COD_CONTO_CNTB = CCC.COD_CONTO_CNTB
    AND S.COD_RUBR_STAT = CCC.COD_RUBR_STAT
    INNER JOIN bsc.S_TIT_RICCONS TRC
    ON CCC.COD_INTER = TRC.COD_INTER_TIT
    AND CCC.COD_SOC = TRC.COD_SOC
    AND TRC.COD_RAGGR_IAS = RTRIM('HFT ')
    AND TRC.COD_RAGGR_IAS NOT IN ('GPO')
    AND TRC.DES_TIP_SLD_TIT_RICCONS IN ('DISPONIBILI')
    AND TRC.DES_MOV_TIT = RTRIM('CONSEGNARE ')
    AND TRC.COD_CAT_TIT = RTRIM('OBBLIGAZIONE ')
    AND TRC.COD_INTER_TIT = RTRIM('334058')
    AND '28-feb-2011' = TRC.DAT_RIF
    LEFT JOIN bsc.S_TIT T
    ON T.COD_INTER_TIT = TRC.COD_INTER_TIT
    AND T.COD_SOC = TRC.COD_SOC
    AND '28-feb-2011' = T.DAT_RIF
    INNER JOIN bsc.S_ANAG_SOGG AG
    ON TRC.COD_NDG = AG.COD_NDG
    AND AG.COD_SOC = TRC.COD_SOC
    AND '28-feb-2011' = AG.DAT_RIF
    WHERE S.DAT_RIF = '28-feb-2011'
    AND (S.FLG_ANULL_BICO = 0
    OR S.FLG_ANULL_BICO IS NULL)
    AND S.COD_SOC = 'ME'
    AND LENGTH(RTRIM(S.COD_CONTO_CNTB)) = 10
    AND S.TIP_PIANO_CNTB = 'IS'
    AND TRC.IMP_PLUS_MINUS_VAL < 0
    AND SUBSTR(S.COD_CONTO_CNTB,1,7) IN (RTRIM('P044C11 '))
    Another time the strange result returns!!
    And I've created the table TITOLI_ORI2 as create table TITOLI_ORI2 (a number); to contain the number result of the query.

  • Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

    The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
    time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
    Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
    with such simple but important tasks.
    I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added. 
    One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
    find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based  on your email history and social media accounts setup.
    And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
    To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list)  that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
    result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
    For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
    Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook  2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
    As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
    random contacts.
    From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on  based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
    address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
    And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
    We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
    (And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
    ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
    Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
    For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
    book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
    If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave),  no results are found at all.
    Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
    I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields. 
    Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding  their info and
    I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
    ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
    For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
    In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
    only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
    ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
    Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply  cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
    field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing  that would prevent them from showing up in results.
    These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
    address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
    For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
    main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
    Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

    Thanks for your reply.
    1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
    I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
    2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
    already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
    Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
    local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
    Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
    ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
    Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book! 
    In summary:
    We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
    We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
    There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
    There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
    Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
    One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
    I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
    I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

  • While Executing a Javascript got RuntimeException - org.mozilla.javascript.EvaluatorException: uSetContextVar: Only valid for Provisioning jobs at line

    Hello Experts,
    I am receiving an error whenever i am executing a java script file. I am calling the script in the below fashion.
    MSKEYVALUE  - $FUNCTION.DP_getMskeyValueForUser(%ABCD01%)$$
    function DP_getMskeyValueForUser(Par){
    ---- Here we have written logic---
           var result = uSelect(query);
          result = DP_generateId("CREATE");// calling another script
        return result;
    function DP_generateId(Par){
    --------------Here Code Logic ----------------------
    --------At ending setting the output value and storing it in the context variable
        uSetContextVar("new_mskeyvalue", newMskeyValue);
        return newMskeyValue;
    While executing i am getting an error message at the above highlighted part stating that got RuntimeException - org.mozilla.javascript.EvaluatorException: uSetContextVar: Only valid for Provisioning jobs at the line
    Can you kindly please help me with this error.
    Regards,
    DP

    Hi DP,
    Hope this helps.
    context var is used if you want to pass values between tasks. If you are using in a job and you want to use values between passes, then you could use a job variable. Or if you want to calculate and use the values in same pass in the job, you can use a Hashmap.
    Kind regards,
    Jai

  • Issue loading Meta Data for IDoc Type WPUKSR01 in XI Integration Repository

    Hi,
    I want to load the Meta Data for IDoc Type WPUKSR01 in XI Integration Repository out of BI. Unfortunately, this IDoc is not available in the IDoc List. I checked in BI and the IDoc Type is available in WE60 and WE30. Also, I can load the Meta Data for the Idoc in XI ABAP (IDX2).
    Can someone tell me why the IDoc doesn't show up in XI Integration Repository Import Object List?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards.
    Alex

    Hi Aamir,
    The Idoc is released since Release 30A. I also tried to load the IDoc Meta Data from ERP with the same result: it does not show up in the list.
    Thanks anyway.
    Alex

  • Strange symbols appear on my desktop, producing even stranger results!

    Strange symbols appear on my desktop, producing even stranger results!

    These symbols are for short cuts. could be a command to move text insertion point to beginning of document or if you have been in system preferences keyboard and clicked on the modifier key and set one of the options it would be for setting cap lock. Don't know why you are showing a screen  shot of it. Have you clicked on it. Have you been doing any work with documents. You could go to disk utilities and repair permissions or do an pram reset. Command/Option?P/R while holding down the power button for three chimes and release.

  • XMLTable and strange results

    I seem to be getting strange or at least unexpected results from the result of a PL SQL Query that uses XMLTable() in Oracle 11g1.
    I have a table in Oracle that looks like this -
    CREATE TABLE EPBNI_XML_TEST
    (<blockquote>RRN VARCHAR(24) PRIMARY KEY,
    ClipID VARCHAR2(27),
    Lodgement XMLType</blockquote>)
    XMLTYPE COLUMN Lodgement
    STORE AS OBJECT RELATIONAL
    ELEMENT "ConditionReportCreateRequest_1.xsd#ConditionReportCreateRequest_1";
    Each XML Document stored in the XMLTYPE Column Lodgement is a little bit like this (simplified) -
    &lt;ConditionReportCreateRequest_1&gt;
    <blockquote>
    &lt;Content&gt;<blockquote>&lt;X-Report&gt;<blockquote>&lt;Report-Header&gt;<blockquote>&lt;RRN&gt;123&lt;/RRN&gt;
    &lt;Report-Type&gt;type A&lt;/Report-Type&gt;
    &lt;Status&gt;status A&lt;/Status&gt;</blockquote>&lt;/Report-Header&gt;</blockquote>&lt;/X-Report&gt;</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>&lt;Y-Report&gt;</blockquote></blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>&lt;Report-Header&gt;</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>&lt;RRN&gt;321&lt;/RRN&gt;
    &lt;Report-Type&gt;type B&lt;/Report-Type&gt;
    &lt;Status&gt;status B&lt;/Status&gt;</blockquote>&lt;/Report-Header&gt;</blockquote>&lt;/Y-Report&gt;</blockquote>&lt;/Content&gt;</blockquote>&lt;/ConditionReportCreateRequest_1&gt;
    Each Lodgement can have one or more reports in the XML document. What I am trying to acheive is getting a single list of the RRN, Report-Type and Status of every report, e.g.
    RRN Report-Type Status
    123 type A status A
    321 type B status B
    112 type A status A
    113 type C status A
    etc... etc....
    My PL SQL and XQuery looks a bit like this -
    SELECT xtab.RRN, xtab.ReportType, xtab.ReportStatus from
    EPBNI_XML_TEST,
    XMLTable('<blockquote>for $reportHeader in /ConditionReportCreateRequest_1/Content/child::element()/Report-Header return
    &lt;report&gt;
              $reportHeader/RRN,
    $reportHeader/Report-Type,
    $reportHeader/Status
    &lt;/report&gt;</blockquote>'
    PASSING LODGEMENT
    COLUMNS
    RRN VARCHAR2(24) PATH 'RRN',
    ReportType VARCHAR2(1) PATH 'Report-Type',
    ReportStatus VARCHAR2(10) PATH 'Status'
    ) xtab;
    The problem is though that I seem to get only 1 result for each row of the table. I.e. if I have 9,000 rows in the EPBNI_XML_TEST table I only get 9,000 results. However I need one result for each report in each lodgement, probably closer to 18,000 results. Also all 9,000 results are the same - which I dont understand - i.e. all 9,000 are -
    RRN Report-Type Status
    123 type A status A
    123 type A status A
    123 type A status A
    (upto 9000 identical result rows...)
    What am I doing wrong or mis-understanding here?
    Thanks Adam.
    Edited by: adamretter on Oct 29, 2008 2:39 PM

    try this
    SELECT xtab.RRN, xtab.ReportType, xtab.ReportStatus from
    EPBNI_XML_TEST,
    ,xmltable('/ConditionReportCreateRequest_1/Content/*/Report-Header'
    passing LODGEMENT
    columns
    rrn varchar2(24) path 'RRN/text()'
    ,reporttype varchar2(10) path 'Report-Type/text()'
    ,status varchar2(10) path 'Status/text()') xtab;**not tested**

  • Pls send material for idocs in ECC 6.0

    Pls send material for idocs in ECC6.0

    Hi sitaram s ,
    IDoc
    - IDoc (for intermediate document) is a standard data structure for electronic data interchange (EDI) between application programs written for the popular SAP business system or between an SAP application and an external program. IDocs serve as the vehicle for data transfer in SAP's Application Link Enabling (ALE) system. IDocs are used for asynchronous transactions: each IDoc generated exists as a self-contained text file that can then be transmitted to the requesting workstation without connecting to the central database. Another SAP mechanism, the Business Application Programming Interface (BAPI) is used for synchronous transactions.
    A large enterprise's networked computing environment is likely to connect many geographically distributed computers to the main database. These computers are likely to use different hardware and/or operating system platforms. An IDoc encapsulates data so that it can be exchanged between different systems without conversion from one format to another.
    IDoc types define different categories of data, such as purchase orders or invoices, which may then be broken down into more specific categories called message types. Greater specificity means that an IDoc type is capable of storing only the data required for a particular transaction, which increases efficiency and decreases resource demands.
    An IDoc can be generated at any point in a transaction process. For example, during a shipping transaction process, an IDoc may be generated that includes the data fields required to print a shipping manifest. After a user performs an SAP transaction, one or more IDocs are generated in the sending database and passed to the ALE communication layer. The communication layer performs a Remote Function Call (RFC), using the port definition and RFC destination specified by the customer model. The IDoc is transmitted to the receiver, which may be an R/3, R/2, or some external system.
    Archiving Processed IDocs
    IDoc archiving is a two-step process:
    1. Archive the IDoc.
    2. After that another job will be generated. You can see in your SARA for your trigger to delete those archived IDocs.
    Have a look at transaction WE47, set "Archiving - Possible" for all statuses to be archived. Use transaction SARA with object IDoc to archive. If the above is set then all IDocs are archived the same way.
    Transaction SARA works in the following way:
    On the main screen enter IDoc as the object. Click on Customising -> Technical settings. This shows the logical filename (configured via transaction FILE & SF01) that will be used to get a filename when writing the archive files. It also shows the document type (that links to an archive via transaction 0AC0) or the archive, depending on SAP version. You can also set the size of the archive files and whether the deletion and storage jobs should execute automatically or not.
    On the main screen there are, amongst others, buttons for ARCHIVE, DELETE and MANAGEMENT. When you click on ARCHIVE you will go to a screen where you can create variants, and set the parameters for the archiving job. The EXECUTE button will schedule this job. If the "start automatic" tic for the deletion program was not set in customising, you will need to go to the DELETE button on the main screen to schedule the deletion jobs, after the archive job has finished. This schedules a job per archive file. In MANAGEMENT you will be able to see the statuses of each archive run.
    SAP Integration Using ALE(Application Linking and Enabling)
    - IDOCS -
    http://www.thespot4sap.com/Articles/SAP_ALE_IDOCS.asp
    Updating IDoc data in segments,Changing a control record of an IDoc,Getting IDocs linked to Application documents,
    Displaying and IDoc in a report,Read IDoc from Database,Creating and sending an IDoc,Update IDoc status on the database
    ALE Inbound Pre-Processing
    http://www.erpgenie.com/sapedi/idoc_abap.htm
    cheers!
    gyanaraj
    reward points if u find this helpful

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to Zoom the Image in JAI

    Hi, I need to zoom the image during the each button click.I have done 1 program ,but i coulnt able to change the parameter block's value each time.Take this program and just change the pic's path and run it ll show the pic,smaller than its actual siz

  • Cost Center Report : Revaluation at actual prices - credit but positive sign

    Hi Experts, Great day! I just want to know the cause of the following unsual behavior of the system. The credit part of the cost center report is blank/zero and when  you double-click the actual line items, it shows that the revaluation at actual pri

  • How to install Window service for Managed Servers of a Cluster

    Dear All,           I am preparing a production setup consist of three machines A,B and C. Machines A is the Admin Server which hosts a cluster consist of two managed nodes. I intend to schedule both these nodes, targeted to two different machines (m

  • Transporting function module

    When I transport a function module from development to quality environment, is the entire function group replaced by the transport request or only the new function module is added to the function group in the quality end. It would be great if someone

  • Dynamic http query string

    I had posted this question earlier in PI forum and it was suggested that I could use ABAP Webdynpro . My requirement is to use execute a dynamic http query string and process the Output file that is returned. I would like to know if this would be fea