Studio 12 with latest patches and wxGTK 2.8.10

Question

Anyone build wxGTK 2.8.10 on Solaris 10 with the Studio 12 compiler + latest Studio 12 patches? /opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/Cstd/memory now has:
  template <class _T , class _Base>
  class __rw_basis : public _Base
    _T __data_;
  public:
    __rw_basis(const __rw_basis& b) : _Base(b), __data_(b.__data_) {;}
    __rw_basis(const _T& t, const _Base& b) : _Base(b), __data_(t) {;}
    __rw_basis(int t, const _Base& b) : _Base(b), __data_((_T)t) {;}   // TEMP
    __rw_basis operator=(const _T& t) { __data_ = t; return *this; }
    __rw_basis operator=(int t) { __data_ = (_T)t; return *this; }   // TEMP
    __rw_basis operator=(const __rw_basis& r)
    { __data_ = r.__data_; return *this; }
    __rw_basis operator=(const _Base& b)
    { *this = __rw_basis<_T,_Base>(__data_,b); return *this; }
    operator _T() { return __data_; }
    _T data() const { return __data_; }
  };It use to have "T" rather than "_T":
  template <class T , class Base>
  class __rw_basis : public Base
    T __data_;
  public:
    __rw_basis(const __rw_basis& b) : Base(b), __data_(b.__data_) {;}
    __rw_basis(const T& t, const Base& b) : Base(b), __data_(t) {;}
    __rw_basis(int t, const Base& b) : Base(b), __data_((T)t) {;}   // TEMP
    __rw_basis operator=(const T& t) { __data_ = t; return *this; }
    __rw_basis operator=(int t) { __data_ = (T)t; return *this; }   // TEMP
    __rw_basis operator=(const __rw_basis& r)
    { __data_ = r.__data_; return *this; }
    __rw_basis operator=(const Base& b)
    { *this = __rw_basis<T,Base>(__data_,b); return *this; }
    operator T() { return __data_; }
    T data() const { return __data_; }
  };The T causes a problem for wxGTK which defines T() and uses it throughout the wxGTK source base. Why the change from "_T" to "T"? Is it because of bug #6797621? What's the best way for me to fix this?

Answer 1

I knew I'd seen this before:
[http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=850&threadID=5376645|http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=850&threadID=5376645]