Summary based on above condition

I have master and detailed blocks
In master block base table items -
1)total_import - stored summary of weight from details blocks based
2)total_export - stored summary of weight from details blocks based
In details block i have two base table colummn
1)transaction_type
2)weight
when user input the weights it will check the transaction_type
transaction_type=1 (ie import ) it should added with total_import
transaction_type=2 (ie export ) it should added with total_export
I want to make summary based on above condition
Help me this issue
thanks
rdk

Hello rdk
Pls in ur details block ....
1.*Create 2 non-db summary* column for both :total_import & :total_export
2.*Then Create When-Validate-Item Trigger* for the weights then write the following code...
IF :transaction_type=1 THEN
:total_import := NVL(:weights ,0) ; -- will assign all the import transactions or inputs...
ELIF transaction_type=2 THEN
:total_export  := NVL( :weights ,0);  -- will assign all the export  transactions or inputs...
END IF;3.Then in PRE-INSERT & PRE-UPDATE Trigger assign the 2 non db items to it's equilavent db ones in the Master-Block
Hope it works just fine :)
Regards,
Abdetu...
Edited by: Abdetu on Feb 27, 2011 6:24 AM

Similar Messages

  • Unable to filter a formula field based on two conditions

    hi,
    I have a report with 3 subreports in it. When i drill down onto first subreport i am getting correct records in details based on selection criteria but when i am unable to populate the same record count in summary.
    For example
    On summary i see : 60 when i drill down i see 20 records which is correct but not reflecting onto summary report
    the details selection criteria is based on two  fields where field1>=1 and field2= "Text"It is coming out good (20 records) but in summary i am unable to populate this based on same selection criteria
    The main issue i am facing was if i apply a filter on summary selection criteria all the subreport counts are getting affected. Is there a way i can apply filters only one one field
    Please suggest
    Thanks!
    Lucky

    Thanks! for the prompt response Abhilash
    I got part of what you told me. Yes i am calculating the counts in the summary report.
    Basically here is the selection criteria: i need to filter the records based on two conditions. One is x.field1= "Admin" and x.field2=act_pct>=1
    For example:
    Admin Returns         50  but when i dig into details it showing as 20 records ( based on selection criteira above)
    when coming back to summary . 50 what ever is returing here is based on a formula ( if x.field1="admin" then 1 else 0) ..in addition to this i need to filter that by x.field2>=1 which is not taking it     
    Is there any syntax to do this
    If i apply a filter on this particular 50 record its bee applying for whole summary report ...
    And from what you said :
    Why don't you create the summary in the Subreport and maybe use shared variables to bring it back to the Main Report?
    i did not get this
    Please suggest
    Lucky

  • Inserting new columns based on the condition!

    Hi guys,
    I have a very simple query like the following… 
    SELECT table2.column_code2,
    table2.column_description2,
                 table2.column_code1,
                 table1.column_description1
    FROM database_001.table2 table1 LFET OUTER JOIN database_001.table2 table1 on (table2.column_code1 = table1.column_code1)
    From this query, its returning me a result set of something like below:
    column_code1       column_description1        column_code2                 column_description2
    RO1                              BOOK                              RL1            
                               PDF/ECOPY
    RO2                              PAPER                             RL2            
                            CONFERENCE
    RO5                            JOURNAL 
    RL11  OTHER
    Now, on the above query I want to insert three extra columns with the name (status, location and contact) where the results in the extra three columns would be based on the conditions I want to define in the query based on the above results…
    Something for example (sorry, I am not trying to write a condition: my question is how to write it), 
    if column_code1 = RO1 and column_description2  =  PDF/ECOPY on status column it should return a value ‘ONLINE’ & on location column it should return ‘WEB’ and on contact column it should write ‘BOB’.
    Also,
    if column_code1 = RO5 and column_description1 = JOURNAL on status column it should return a value ‘ON PRESS FOR PRINT’ & on location column it should return ‘S.R STREET, LONDON’ and on contact column it should write
    ‘SMITH’ like below result…so the final output should be the top four columns and the extra three columns…I hope someone can help me into this…thanks a lot…
    status                                            location                
                            contact
    ONLINE                                               WEB                          
                           BOB
    ON PRESS FOR PRINT                     S.R STREET, LONDON                           SMITH

    Hi artistdigital,
    you can use case statment for same in sql server. MSDN link - > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms181765.aspx
    Try code like this:
    SELECT table2.column_code2,
    table2.column_description2,
    table2.column_code1,
    table1.column_description1,
    case when column_code1 = 'RO1' and column_description2 = 'PDF/ECOPY' then 'ONLINE'
    when column_code1 = 'RO5' and column_description1 = 'PDF/ECOPY' then 'ON PRESS FOR PRINT'
    end as [status],
    case when column_code1 = 'RO1' and column_description2 = 'PDF/ECOPY' then 'WEB'
    when column_code1 = 'RO5' and column_description1 = 'PDF/ECOPY' then 'S.R STREET, LONDON'
    end as [Location],
    case when column_code1 = 'RO1' and column_description2 = 'PDF/ECOPY' then 'BOB'
    when column_code1 = 'RO5' and column_description1 = 'PDF/ECOPY' then 'SMITH'
    end as [contact]
    FROM table2
    join table1
    on table2.column_code1 = table1.column_code1
    Regards Harsh

  • Dynamic insertion of elements based on dynamic condition

    I need to achieve the following:
    Input:
    <Customer>
         <name>Name1</name>
         <email>Email1</email>
         <phone>Phone1</phone>
         <Number>Num1</Number>
    <Customer>     
    Output:
    <Customer>
         <name>Name1</name>
         <email>Email1</email>
         <phone>Phone1</phone>
         <Number>Num1</Number>
         <Addresses>
              <Address>add1</Address>
              <Address>add1</Address>
              <Address>add1</Address>
         </Addresses>
    <Customer>
    Based on the number of Addresses that exist for the customer, multiple <Address> elements should be added.
    I can't determine number of Addresses at the beginning. It is deterrmined dynamically based on certain condition.
    So each time when the condition is met, I need to get the count of <Address> elements that exist and insert the new one last.
    My logic:
         Switch (case)     ==> Add <Address> only if condition is met
              count ==> count(bpws:getVariableData('outputVariable','payload','/ns1:Customer/ns1:Addresses')) ==> 0 first time
              <Addresses>
                   <Address>add1</Address> ===> Now I need to insert this.
              </Addresses>
    I have the following in my bpel:
    <assign name="AssignInsertAfterExisting">
    <copy>
    <from expression="count(bpws:getVariableData('outputVariable','payload','/ns1:Customer/ns1:Addresses'))"/>
    <to variable="NumberOfAds"/>
    </copy>
    <copy>
    <from expression="'123 street'"/>
    <to variable="nextAddress"/>
    </copy>
    <bpelx:insertAfter>
    <bpelx:from variable="nextAddress"/>
    <bpelx:to variable="outputVariable" part="payload"
    query="/ns1:Customer/ns1:Addresses/ns1:Address squareBrakets NumberOfAds squareBrakets"/>
    </bpelx:insertAfter>
    </assign>
    But with the above I am receiving the folllowing error:
         Assign Operation Misuse.
         The to-spec does not yield any data; insertAfter operation cannot be performed.
    Please check the BPEL source at line number ..
    I can I insert dynamically insert elements into array. I have seen the example provided in samples, but my problem is little different than that.
    Edited by: user10367892 on Aug 4, 2009 3:16 AM

    append is appending value of variable to existing element, instead of creating a new element in the array:
    For Eg:
    Input:
    <bpelx:append>
    <bpelx:from variable="nextAddress"/>
    <bpelx:to variable="outputVariable" part="payload" query="/ns1:Customer/ns1:Addresses/ns1:Address"/>
    </bpelx:append>
    Output if nextAddress = Address2 and if <Address>Address1</Address> already exists
    <Customer>
         <Addresses>
              <Address>Address1Address2</Address>
         </Addresses>
    </Customer>

  • Advance Aggregation based on multiple conditions

    Hi members,
    I have a situation where I need to aggregate data based on multiple conditions. Relevant details of the problem is as follows.
    There is a table (let's call X). It has following columns:
    Transaction_Time (date)
    Transaction_direction (Possible values IN or OUT)
    Column_1
    Column_2
    Based on the columns: Transaction_direction, Column_1, Column_2, the type of the transaction will be derived. For example, if transaction_direction='IN' then transaction type is IN, if 'OUT' then transaction types are Out. Similarly if Column_1=Column_2 then transaction type is Txn_3 otherwise 4.
    Based on date and transaction types the aggregation will happen.The sample output would be:
    Time, Transaction type (IN, OUT, Txn_3, Txn_4), Sum of transactions
    10-June-2013 00:00  IN Transactions  2500
    10-June-2013 00:00  Txn_3 Transactions 3590
    and so.
    IN and Out transactions are easy to be derived using decode() function. However avoiding multiple UNION ALL and write a single SQL for all four conditions is tricky one.
    Hope I clarified.
    Neeraj

    What version of Oracle are you using?
    If you're on 11.x you can use the UNPIVOT feature as follows:
    with t (Transaction_Time, Transaction_direction, Column_1, Column_2) as (
    select date '2013-06-10', 'IN', 1, 1 from dual union all
    select date '2013-06-10', 'IN', 2, 2 from dual union all
    select date '2013-06-10', 'IN', 1, 2 from dual union all
    select date '2013-06-10', 'IN', 3, 4 from dual union all
    select date '2013-06-10', 'OUT', 3, 3 from dual union all
    select date '2013-06-10', 'OUT', 3, 4 from dual
    select * from (
    select
      transaction_time
    , sum(case when transaction_direction = 'IN' then 1 end)  as IN_count
    , sum(case when transaction_direction = 'OUT' then 1 end) as OUT_count
    , sum(case when Column_1 = Column_2 then 1 end)           as Txn_3_count
    , sum(case when Column_1 != Column_2 then 1 end)          as Txn_4_count
    from t
    group by transaction_time
    unpivot (
      txn_count for transaction_type in (
         IN_count as 'IN'
      ,  OUT_count as 'OUT'
      ,  Txn_3_count as 'Txn_3'
      ,  Txn_4_count as 'Txn_4'
    order by transaction_time, transaction_type
    TRANSACTION_TIME TRANSACTION_TYPE TXN_COUNT
    2013-06-10       IN               4      
    2013-06-10       OUT              2     
    2013-06-10       Txn_3            3      
    2013-06-10       Txn_4            3      
    If you're okay with getting one row per date with the 4 counts you can just use the inner select above, i.e.
    select
      transaction_time
    , sum(case when transaction_direction = 'IN' then 1 end)  as IN_count
    , sum(case when transaction_direction = 'OUT' then 1 end) as OUT_count
    , sum(case when Column_1 = Column_2 then 1 end)           as Txn_3_count
    , sum(case when Column_1 != Column_2 then 1 end)          as Txn_4_count
    from t
    group by transaction_time
    order by transaction_time
    TRANSACTION_TIME IN_COUNT OUT_COUNT  TXN_3_COUNT  TXN_4_COUNT
    2013-06-10       4        2          3            3      
    If you want to sum transaction amounts then use the same logic, except in the case statements replace 1 with the column you want to sum.
    Regards,
    Bob

  • Can we take standard report for all sales orders based on the condition typ

    Hi all,
    Based on the condition type, we need to take a report for sales orders on the particular date.
    Thanks and Regards.....VM

    Hello again.
    Searching for a solution, I found a Logical Database for sales orders, that have all the information that you need.
    Using like reference the post of Bhagavatula, in the same transaction SQVI you can use, instead of the suggested join, you can select a logical database called VAV in Data source.
    This logical database links the tables, VBAK, VBAP, VBUK and KONV that is the central point of the question.
    You can list the information of logical database using the transaction SLDB.
    In 'Logical Database' inform VAV.
    Press F8 to list all the fields.
    More information about logical database in:
    Link: [SAP Logical Database|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46C/helpdata/EN/9f/db9b5e35c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm]

  • VT02N - do PGI and Invoice for certain deliveries either based on certain conditions

    Hi Friends ,
    We are using VT04 for creating shipments . While shipment completion stage in VT02N   an activity profile has been maintained  which does both the Goods issue and Invoice.
    We have a business requirement , PGI and Invoice should be created only for specific set of deliveries based on certain conditions.
    Is there any standard way to do this or by using user exits.
    Please guide.
    Thanks,
    Nileshsa.

    what about adding a check in userexit RV60AFZZ, when the condition is not met during invoice creation, error out and disable the creation of the invoice document?

  • How to create a column based on a condition ?

    Hi all,
    I am trying to create a stored procedure that will return ID,Name and a column of type bit called  called checked based on a condition 
    please review my code and tell me what is wrong with it 
    ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[SelectStoresNames]
    AS
    BEGIN
    WITH locations_CTE ( ID,  Name, Checked)
    AS
    select loc.ID,loc.Name,
    (case when loc. ID in (select distinct a.StoreId
    from mPromoteStores a
    inner join mPromote b
    on a.PromoteId=b.PromoteId
    where b.promoId=144120) then 1 else 0 end as [Checked])
    FROM [dbo].[mLocations] loc where SchedulePullEnabled=1 order by  Name
    Select *
    from locations_CTE
    END

    Please post DDL, so that people do not have to guess what the keys, constraints, Declarative Referential Integrity, data types, etc. in your schema are. Learn how to follow ISO-11179 data element naming conventions and formatting rules. You have no idea!
    Temporal data should use ISO-8601 formats. Code should be in Standard SQL as much as possible and not local dialect. 
    This is minimal polite behavior on SQL forums. 
    >> I am trying to create a stored procedure that will return store_id, store_name and a column of type bit called “checked” based on a condition <<
    I fixed the vague, useless, generic data elements, made wild guesses on the DDL you did not post and got rid of the assembly language bit flags (https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/t-sql-programming/bit-of-a-problem/)
    1. IN (SELECT DISTINCT ..) is redundant
    2. aliases in alphabetic order are no help for maintaining code
    3. What is that “m” prefix? Better not be metadata...
    4. We also do not use “-cte” postfixes; tell us what the table is and not how you got it. This is another version of the “vw-” or “Volkswagen” design flaw for views.
    5. “promote” is a verb, so how can it have an identifier? Entities have identifiers. A set of  “Promotions” could have a “promo_id”, but this might be a typo ..
    6. Is “schedule_pull_enabled” another assembly language flag? I have the horrible feeling your unseen schema is not in 1NF ...
    Since you did not post DDL here is as far as I can get ..
    CREATE PROCEDURE Select_Stores_Names
    AS
    SELECT PS.store_id, PS.store_name
      FROM Promote_Stores AS PS,
                 Promotes AS P
    WHERE PS.promote_id = P.promote_id 
      AND P.promo_id = 144120  -- promo vs promote? 
      AND ???; 
    Want to follow the forum rules and try again? 
    --CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking
    in Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL

  • How to secure access of Report based on a condition

    Hello Experts,
    My project requirement is to secure BW Reports based on a condition. For e.g a user should be authorized to access the Report if:
    1. He is the WBS Manager of the selected WBS Element
    OR
    2. If he is authorized to access the Profit center Hierarchy Node which is the parent of the selected WBS Element.
    I think this may be achieved by using a Customer exit in the Analysis authorization but i don't know how.
    Do you have any idea, whether it is possible to achieve in BI7 Security Model? Any help will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Rajat

    Hi Tomer,
    There will be a selection variable for WBS in all BW reports. If the user selects a particular WBS Element then he can only see the result of the report if he fulfill EITHER of the following conditions:
    1. If he is the WBS Manager of the selected WBS Element
    OR
    2. If he is authorized to access the Profit center Hierarchy Node which is the parent of the selected WBS Element.
    WBS managers will keep on changing so it is not possible to maintain the users in one role.
    Secondly, according to the second condition, even if the user is not WBS Manager but he is authorized to access Profit center Hierarchy Node, which is the parent of the selected WBS Element, he should view the report.
    Please let me know if don't understand the question.
    Thanks
    Rajat

  • Column value coloring Based on the condition in ssrs 2008

    Hi,
    I need to change color formating based on below conditions
    Red if <=28 days or > 65 days       
    Green if >28 and <=60 days       
    Yellow if > 60 days and <=65 days
    <=0 No color
    I tried with below IIF condition it's not working.
    =iif(Fields!HDSI13.Value<=0,
    "No color",iif((Fields!HDSI13.Value<=28
    or Fields!HDSI13.Value>64),"Red",iif((Fields!HDSI13.Value>29
    and Fields!HDSI13.Value<=60),"Green",iif((Fields!HDSI13.Value>60
    and Fields!HDSI13.Value<=65),"yellow",Nothing))))
    Can any one help me on this.
    Thanks,
    Manasa.
    Thank You, Manasa.V

    hi all,
    When i wrote like this in table report ...woking fine.
    =iif(((Fields!HDSI13.Value<=28
    and Fields!HDSI13.Value>0)
    or Fields!HDSI13.Value>64),"Red",iif((Fields!HDSI13.Value>=29
    and Fields!HDSI13.Value<=60),"Green",iif((Fields!HDSI13.Value>=61
    and Fields!HDSI13.Value<=65),"yellow",iif(Fields!HDSI13.Value<=0,"Nocolor",""))))
    Thank You, Manasa.V

  • Dropdown editable in a table based on a condition

    Hi,
    I would like to know how to solve these problems.
    1. I have a cell (of the type dropdown by key) in a table, which is editable or not, depending on a condition ? Is this is possible? Please let me know if there is a sample code
    2. So basically I have a  table that has 2 entries in it, user details and one of the fields in FLAG showing the values Yand N for the user. I want the table in the webdynpro application to show the 2 user entries and then in the Flag column have a DROPDOWNBYKEY that DEFAULTS to showing what flag the user has, but also allows the user to CHANGE the entry.
    Thanks in advance
    I appreciate for the help.

    is possible
    In your Context node which is binded to the table as DataSource, add an attribute WDY_BOOLEAN type
    In layout bind the newly created attribute to the dropdown UI element Enable property
    while filling your context node, fill the attribute with abap_true and abap_false based on your condition
    Abhi

  • 1:N mapping without using BPM , based on segment conditions

    Hi All,
    I have to send 3 different files from source based on some conditions
    1) for the first file to be sent is okay
    2) But for second file and third file i need to check some conditions
    the conditions are
    If E1EDL44 case detail fields exists   i should generate second file and i should not create any third file  (it's one or the other, not both).
    If E1EDL44 case details doesnot exist i should generate third file and not second file...
    So My confusion is how to send either second or third file (any one only)
    If i do mapping  is it sufficient or also should i use condition editor in Receiver Determination...
    Please suggest u r valuable help..
    Thanks and Regards,
    sridhar

    Hi Sridhar,
    Make ur second interface Occurence as Optional 0:1 in ur Interfaec Mapping.
    In ur Multi-mapping (Message Mapping) also make ur  message type corresponding to ur second file as Optional.
    In ur mapping check the condition and if doesnot satisfy dont populate the second message type. Check this option.
    Regards,
    Sudharshan

  • How to activate or deactivate a user-exit based a specific condition

    hi all,
    i want to activate or deactivate(make it trigger) a particular user-exit based in a condition.
    can i do that. if yes please tell me how.
    can we use COMMIT in user-exits or BADI's.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Saroja.

    Hello Saroja
    The solution provided by Rich should be used for testing purposes only in the the reverted sense:
    IF ( syst-uname ne '<specific user>' ).
      RETURN.
    ENDIF.
    " Execute user-exit for specific user
    However, for serious programming you should use a a better strategy. In principle, user-exits are either ON or OFF and, if they are ON, they are ON for <b>all </b>user which is usually not intended.
    The following example shows a (possible) strategy how to execute user-exits based on specific conditions.
    The SAP extension CATS0001 contains the component EXIT_SAPLCATS_001 with the following interface:
    FUNCTION EXIT_SAPLCATS_001.
    *"*"Lokale Schnittstelle:
    *"  IMPORTING
    *"     VALUE(SAP_TCATS) LIKE  TCATS STRUCTURE  TCATS
    *"     VALUE(SAP_PERNR) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-PERNR
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATELEFT) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATELEFT
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATERIGHT) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATERIGHT
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATEFROM) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATEFROM OPTIONAL
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATETO) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATETO OPTIONAL
    *"  TABLES
    *"      SAP_ICATSW STRUCTURE  CATSW
    *"      SAP_ICATSW_FIX STRUCTURE  CATSW OPTIONAL
      INCLUDE ZXCATU01.
    ENDFUNCTION.
    The include ZXCATU01 contains only the following coding:
      CALL FUNCTION 'Z_EXIT_SAPLCATS_001'
        EXPORTING
          sap_tcats            = sap_tcats
          sap_pernr            = sap_pernr
          sap_dateleft         = sap_dateleft
          sap_dateright        = sap_dateright
          SAP_DATEFROM         = SAP_DATEFROM
          SAP_DATETO           = SAP_DATETO
        tables
          sap_icatsw           = sap_icatsw
          SAP_ICATSW_FIX       = SAP_ICATSW_FIX.
    This function module is just a copy of the exit function module in the customer namespace.
    Let us assume that your condition at which the user-exit should be executed is that the employee (SAP_PERNR) belongs to a specific controlling area. Thus, we make another copy of the original exit function module and call this fm within the "general" customer-specific exit function module:
    FUNCTION z_exit_saplcats_001.
    *"*"Local Interface:
    *"  IMPORTING
    *"     VALUE(SAP_TCATS) LIKE  TCATS STRUCTURE  TCATS
    *"     VALUE(SAP_PERNR) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-PERNR
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATELEFT) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATELEFT
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATERIGHT) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATERIGHT
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATEFROM) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATEFROM OPTIONAL
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATETO) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATETO OPTIONAL
    *"  TABLES
    *"      SAP_ICATSW STRUCTURE  CATSW
    *"      SAP_ICATSW_FIX STRUCTURE  CATSW OPTIONAL
    " User-Exit specific for employees (SAP_PERNR)
    " belonging to controlling area 1000
      CALL FUNCTION 'Z_EXIT_SAPLCATS_001_1000'
        EXPORTING
          sap_tcats      = sap_tcats
          sap_pernr      = sap_pernr
          sap_dateleft   = sap_dateleft
          sap_dateright  = sap_dateright
          sap_datefrom   = sap_datefrom
          sap_dateto     = sap_dateto
        TABLES
          sap_icatsw     = sap_icatsw
          sap_icatsw_fix = sap_icatsw_fix.
    " User-Exit specific for employees (SAP_PERNR)
    " belonging to controlling area 2000
      CALL FUNCTION 'Z_EXIT_SAPLCATS_001_2000'
        EXPORTING
          sap_tcats      = sap_tcats
          sap_pernr      = sap_pernr
          sap_dateleft   = sap_dateleft
          sap_dateright  = sap_dateright
          sap_datefrom   = sap_datefrom
          sap_dateto     = sap_dateto
        TABLES
          sap_icatsw     = sap_icatsw
          sap_icatsw_fix = sap_icatsw_fix.
    ENDFUNCTION.
    Finally, within the specific exit function module we define the condition when the exit should be executed:
    FUNCTION z_exit_saplcats_001_1000.
    *"*"Local Interface:
    *"  IMPORTING
    *"     VALUE(SAP_TCATS) LIKE  TCATS STRUCTURE  TCATS
    *"     VALUE(SAP_PERNR) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-PERNR
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATELEFT) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATELEFT
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATERIGHT) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATERIGHT
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATEFROM) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATEFROM OPTIONAL
    *"     VALUE(SAP_DATETO) LIKE  CATSFIELDS-DATETO OPTIONAL
    *"  TABLES
    *"      SAP_ICATSW STRUCTURE  CATSW
    *"      SAP_ICATSW_FIX STRUCTURE  CATSW OPTIONAL
      IF ( <user BELONGS to CONTROLLING area 1000> ).
        "   execute user-exit
      ELSE.
        RETURN.
      ENDIF.
    ENDFUNCTION.
    The alternative would be to place the entire coding including the conditions in the include ZXCATU01. However, in this case you can test the user exit <b>only in the context of the transaction</b> in which the user-exit is passed.
    Using the strategy I have devised you are able to test the user-exit in general and the specific user-exits <b>independent </b>of the transaction. For example, if you are already working on 6.40 or higher then you could use ABAP Unit Testing for this purpose.
    The same logic can be applied for BAdI where we can have only a single active implementation.
    Finally, I hope to convince that it makes sense to spend some time into a reasonable strategy for implementing user-exits.
    Regards
      Uwe

  • Displaying record based on the condition in Crystal report

    Hi All,
    I want to display certain records in crystal based on some condition.
    For example,
    If I am having 5 student records like,
    Name  Mark1 Mark2 Mark3 Total
    aaa      40       50       60      150
    abc      30       60       40       130
    tcr        25      25        25       75
    Now in table i have only 4 fields (STUNAME, MARK1, MARK2, MARK3).
    I have to calculate the total at runtime and if total is greater than 150, then actual record should display in report.
    For example, I can use formula to calculate total but I can calculate total only after each record prints. But i want to calculate total internally only it should display in report if condition satisfies. I dont want to keep one more field for total in crystal report.
    Please help me on this.

    If the filter is not "pushed" down to the database, then Crystal will pull all of the data into memory and then filter it there.  This is not a big deal if you only have a couple of records, but it can significantly slow down a report that is pulling in more than a few records.
    An alternative, if your report is just linking tables in the Database Expert, would be to create a SQL Expression that adds the three fields together.  Using this in the Select Expert WILL push the condition down to the database.
    If you're using a command instead of linking table, they you would add this to the Where clause of the comment.  If you're using a stored proc instead of tables or a command, you would want to do this filter in the code for the stored proc.
    -Dell
    Message was edited by: Dell Stinnett-Christy

  • How to dynamically add/remove a button from the ribbon based on some condition? (Ribbon XML)

    Hi,
    I have a ribbon (done using ribbon XML) with menu options. I need to remove few buttons from the menu dynamically based on some condition. Also, I want to change the label of another button. How to achieve this programmatically? (C#)
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks Prasad

    Hello Prasad,
    Use callbacks for populating Ribbon controls such as menu, dropDown, gallery and etc. Then you can use the
    Invalidate or
    InvalidateControl methods of the
    IRibbonUI interface to get your callbacks invoked when required. Thus, you will be able to delete the required item(s).
    You will find the following articles in MSDN helpful:
    Chapter 11: Creating Dynamic Ribbon Customizations (1 of 2)
    Chapter 11: Creating Dynamic Ribbon Customizations (2 of 2)
    To change the label of your controls at runtime you need to use the getLabel callback and call the Invalidate or InvalidateControl methods of the IRibbonUI interface. The following series of articles describe the Fluent UI in depth:
    Customizing the 2007 Office Fluent Ribbon for Developers (Part 1 of 3)
    Customizing the 2007 Office Fluent Ribbon for Developers (Part 2 of 3)
    Customizing the 2007 Office Fluent Ribbon for Developers (Part 3 of 3)

Maybe you are looking for

  • Roboto font not available in certain applications and Openbox menu

    I have downloaded Roboto TTF font from here and saved it in ~/.fonts. After downloading it, I ran: $ fc-cache -vf After that, I changed the font in lxappearance and obconf and every single application I have tried so far uses it by default now except

  • Why have iCal entries suddenly appeared in duplicate for every month?

    My iPhones and iPad are synced with my iMac via iCloud. All devices work perfectly except iCal on my iMac shows all entries in duplicate. Adding a new entry shows up as a duplicate in the iMac but as a single entry on all other devices (which is corr

  • [LR 4.1 - Library] Minor but annoying bug with mouse cursor

    Hi, There is a minor but irritating bug with the mouse cursor in the Library module. Steps to reproduce: 1. Activate the Library module. 2. Move the mouse cursor into the image area. The mouse cursor looks like a magnifying glass. 3. Move the mouse c

  • Lightroom not detecting Photoshop cs5

    Lightroom 4 only detects Photoshop cs2, not cs5, so I can't jump over to cs5 for further editting. Is there an easy way to correct this? I assume it is because cs2 was installed after cs5 (don't ask, it wasn't me!)

  • Default Index page using NetBeans

    Hi, Need to execute a index servlet when i enter this URL. http://localhost:8084/mywebapproot/admin as the IDE i am using NB5.5. I added a folder named admin by using this path. mywebapproot >> right click >>new Folder but it doesn't create a Folder